Next Article in Journal
Penile Fracture of the Crus Penis Following Taqaandan
Previous Article in Journal
Pelvic Floor Muscle Function and Its Relationship with Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence
 
 
Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal is published by MDPI from Volume 5 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Société Internationale d’Urologie.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Complete Response of Primary Penile Tumor With Induction Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin (TIP) Chemotherapy

by
Logan Zemp
1,*,
Jad Chahoud
1,
Peter A. Johnstone
2 and
Philipp E. Spiess
1
1
Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2023, 4(2), 150-152; https://doi.org/10.48083/GVTL9492
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 18 October 2022 / Accepted: 22 October 2022 / Published: 16 March 2023
The patient was a 53-year-old male who presented to Moffitt Cancer Center with a fungating lesion of the ventral penis and scrotum which was biopsy proven to be well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, invasive into at least the lamina propria, and unknown human papillomavirus (HPV) (Figure 1A). Presentation was delayed because of lack of health insurance. The penile lesion was mobile and inguinal lymph node (iLN) enlargement was not appreciated on physical examination. Staging CT and MRI imaging identified tumor effacement of the corpus spongiosum (Figure 1B), no evidence of iLN, pelvic, or distant metastases.
The patient was counselled on radical penectomy due to concern for ≥ cT2 disease, but he adamantly refused penectomy despite guideline directed counselling [1]. The case was presented at Multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) who favored penectomy, but patient preference was considered, and wide local excision with suprapubic catheter placement and staged penile urethroplasty after a period of observation to ensure adequate local control was discussed and presented to the patient. He refused.
Additional MDT discussions led to recommendation for induction paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) chemotherapy due to limited treatment options. The patient underwent 4 cycles of TIP chemotherapy without major adverse events resulting in a complete response (Figure 1C,D). The patient underwent 28 fractions of external beam radiation to the iLNs. At most recent follow-up he has no evidence of disease.
These clinical images document the complete response of a large primary penile tumor with TIP chemotherapy alone and importance of multidisciplinary care.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. Clark, P.E.; Spiess, P.E.; Agarwal, N.; Biagioli, M.C.; Eisenberger, M.A.; Greenberg, R.E.; Herr, H.W.; Inman, B.A.; Kuban, D.A.; Kuzel, T.M.; et al. Penile cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2013, 11, 594–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representative photo of the penile lesion (A) On initial presentation. (B) Pre-treatment sagittal and axial MRI demonstrating penile mass with effacement of the corpus spongiosum. (C) Penile lesion status post 3 cycles paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) Chemotherapy. (D) Post-treatment MRI images with resolution of primary penile tumor.
Figure 1. Representative photo of the penile lesion (A) On initial presentation. (B) Pre-treatment sagittal and axial MRI demonstrating penile mass with effacement of the corpus spongiosum. (C) Penile lesion status post 3 cycles paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) Chemotherapy. (D) Post-treatment MRI images with resolution of primary penile tumor.
Siuj 04 00150 g001aSiuj 04 00150 g001b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zemp, L.; Chahoud, J.; Johnstone, P.A.; Spiess, P.E. Complete Response of Primary Penile Tumor With Induction Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin (TIP) Chemotherapy. Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2023, 4, 150-152. https://doi.org/10.48083/GVTL9492

AMA Style

Zemp L, Chahoud J, Johnstone PA, Spiess PE. Complete Response of Primary Penile Tumor With Induction Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin (TIP) Chemotherapy. Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal. 2023; 4(2):150-152. https://doi.org/10.48083/GVTL9492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zemp, Logan, Jad Chahoud, Peter A. Johnstone, and Philipp E. Spiess. 2023. "Complete Response of Primary Penile Tumor With Induction Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin (TIP) Chemotherapy" Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal 4, no. 2: 150-152. https://doi.org/10.48083/GVTL9492

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop