Digitalization of Public Services—An Input Output Logit Analysis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. The Research Questions
- How have various ICT measures deployed across the 20 departments and ministries (DMs) of the government of Sri Lanka improved the delivery of PSD represented by customer satisfaction?
- To what extent has satisfaction translated into agreement or disagreement regarding the appropriateness of the measures?
- How are these measures and post-implementation perception thereof connected?
3.2. Data and Materials
3.3. Methodology
4. Results
4.1. Summary Statistics
4.2. Data Consistency Test
4.3. Correlations
4.4. Ologit Regression
4.5. Sensitivity and Specificity Test
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arunatilake, N.; Jayasuriya, S.; Kelegama, S. The Economic Cost of the War in Sri Lanka. World Dev. 2001, 29, 1483–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shyamika, J.S. Lost in transition: Linking war, war economy and post-war crime in Sri Lanka. Third World Themat. A TWQ J. 2018, 3, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanna, N.K. From Envisioning to Designing e-Development: The Experience of Sri Lanka. Directions in Development; Information and Communication Technologies; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6628 (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Biller, D.; Nabi, I. Investing in Infrastructure: Harnessing Its Potential for Growth in Sri Lanka. Directions in Development--Infrastructure; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15810 (accessed on 20 October 2020).
- Dissanayake, S.; Lakshman, D. Development of E-Governance in Sri Lanka. In Digital Public Administration and E-Government in Developing Nations: Policy and Practice; Edward Francis, H., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geels, F.W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 2002, 31, 1257–7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rotmans, J.; Kemp, R.; Asselt, M. More evolution than revolution. Transition management in public policy. Foresight 2001, 3, 15–31. [Google Scholar]
- Geels, F.W. Technological Transitions and System Innovations; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Dawley, S. Creating New Paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Econ. Geogr. 2014, 90, 91–112. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzucato, M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths; Anthem Press: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Tanner, A.N. Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Econ. Geogr. 2014, 90, 403–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pardhasaradhi, Y.; Bagga, R.K.; Vijaya, K.S.; Sekhar, Y. “Role of ICT Infrastructure in Public Service Delivery.” A Report on ICT and Infrastructure, Report No: IIIT/TR/2013/-1. 2013, pp. 47–52. Available online: http://web2py.iiit.ac.in/research_centres/publications/download/inproceedings.pdf.9c97e6849a0acbf9.435349323031332d526f6c654f66494354496e6672617374727563747572652d436f6e76656e74696f6e50726f2d34372d35322e706466.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
- Korneta, P. Critical success factors for Polish agricultural distributors. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 1565–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y. Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Usage: Functionality of E-Participation Applications. Adm. Soc. 2017, 49, 423–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alahakoon, M.U.I.; Jehan, S.N. Efficiency of Public Service Delivery—A Post-ICT Deployment Analysis. Economies 2020, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del, S.; Carlotta, R.L.O.; Emanuele, P. Governing the public sector e-performance: The accounting practices in the digital age. In Decision Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- ICTA. Government Organizations Visitors’ Survey, Information Communication Technology Agency of Sri Lanka, 2008, Colombo. Available online: www.icta.lk/ (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Moore, M. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- John, A.; Janine, O. Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings. Int. J. Public Adm. 2009, 32, 171–191. [Google Scholar]
- Tavakol, M.; Reg, D. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med Educ. 2011, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Long, J.S.; Freese, J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd ed.; Stata Press: Station, TX, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Agresti, A. A model for repeated measurements of a multivariate binary response. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1997, 92, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Koirala, H. Ordinal Regression Analysis: Using Generalized Ordinal Logistic Regression Models to Estimate Educational Data. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods 2012, 11, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fullerton, A.S. A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models. Sociol. Methods Res. 2009, 38, 306–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, F.; Ivy, L.; Roy, C. A method for ordinal outcomes: The ordered stereotype model. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2019, 28, e1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ananth, C.V.; Kleinbaum, D.G. Regression models for ordinal responses: A review of methods and applications. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 26, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shapiro, D.E. The interpretation of diagnostic tests. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1999, 8, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaya, S.M.; Margaret, S.P. Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomes. Biostatistics 2004, 5, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hand, D.J. Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress. Stat. Sci. 2006, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, V.; Tan, P.; Steinbach, M. Data mining. In Handbook of Data Structures and Applications; Mehta, D.P., Sahni, S., Eds.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Jehan, S.N.; Nishantha, G.G.D.; Jehan, S.Q. E-governance initiative in Sri Lankan public service delivery. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Gangwon-Do, Korea, 7–10 February 2010; pp. 1625–1629. [Google Scholar]
- Jehan, S.N.; Nishantha, G.G.D.; Uchida, Y. BPR in large public organizations: A case of managing change in a developing country. J. Jpn. Assoc. Manag. Syst. 2010, 27, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
- Elapatha, V.W.; Jehan, S.N. An Analysis of the Implementation of Business Process Re-engineering in Public Services. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. of Questions | Response | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree | |
Input questions (1, 2, 3….20) IT (from implementers) | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Outcome questions (1, 2, 3….20) Satisfaction (from the public) | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Total questions, 20 each side | Total responses, 400 (200 each from both sides) |
Department/Ministry | No. of Questionnaires Collected from Employees (n1 = 200) | No. of Questionnaires Collected from Clients (n2 = 200) | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Department of Immigration & Emigration | 10 | 10 |
2. | Department of Register of Persons | 10 | 10 |
3. | Department of Import and Export | 10 | 10 |
4. | Department of Examination | 10 | 10 |
5. | Department of Customs | 10 | 10 |
6. | Department of Motor Traffic | 10 | 10 |
7. | Department of Registrar General | 10 | 10 |
8. | Department of Pension | 10 | 10 |
9. | Department of Fisheries | 10 | 10 |
10. | Department of Railway | 10 | 10 |
11. | Department of Labor | 10 | 10 |
12. | Ministry of Education | 10 | 10 |
13. | Ministry of Healthcare | 10 | 10 |
14. | Election Commission | 10 | 10 |
15. | Police Commission | 10 | 10 |
16. | Foreign Bureau | 10 | 10 |
17. | Electricity Board | 10 | 10 |
18. | Central Bank | 10 | 10 |
19. | National Transport Commission | 10 | 10 |
20. | Ministry of Foreign Affairs | 10 | 10 |
Total responses (n = 400) |
Stats | IT | Satisfaction | AD |
---|---|---|---|
N | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Mean | 3.651 | 3.364 | 0.15 |
Max | 4.950 | 4.800 | 1.00 |
Min | 1.900 | 1.8500 | 0.00 |
SD | 0.486526 | 0.570879 | 0.357968 |
Variance | 0.236708 | 0.325903 | 0.128141 |
Skewness | −0.24047 | −0.02558 | 1.960392 |
Kurtosis | 3.565879 | 2.770013 | 4.843137 |
Item | Obs. | Item-Test Corr. | Item-Rest Corr. | Inter Item Cov. | Alpha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IT | 200 | +0.5565 | 0.0939 | 0.1336055 | 0.7410 |
Satisfaction | 200 | +0.8394 | 0.4560 | 0.0106533 | 0.1104 |
AD | 200 | +0.7478 | 0.5123 | 0.0281520 | 0.1819 |
Test scale | - | - | 0.0574703 | 0.4995 | - |
IT | Satisfaction | AD | |
---|---|---|---|
IT | 1.0000 | - | - |
Satisfaction | 0.1014 | 1.0000 | - |
AD | 0.6612 | 0.6538 | 1.0000 |
Item | IT | Satisfaction | AD |
---|---|---|---|
IT | 1.0000 | - | - |
Satisfaction | 0.0888 | 1.0000 | - |
AD | 0.0740 | 0.6188 | 1.0000 |
- | n = 200 LR chi2(1) = 1.82 Prob > chi2 = 0.1771 | |||||
Log likelihood = −738.58902 | Pseudo R2 = 0.0012 | |||||
Satisfaction | Coef. | Std. Err. | z | P > |z| | 95% Conf. Interval | |
IT | 1.432329 | 0.5958207 | 0.860 | 0.0388 | 0.6338111 | 3.236875 |
_Cons | 1.432329 | 0.0731656 | −1.970 | 0.0490 | 0.0022293 | 0.992195 |
Classified | ---------------------- True ------------------ | ||
---|---|---|---|
D | ~D | Total | |
+ | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- | 30 | 170 | 200 |
Total | 30 | 170 | 200 |
Classified + if predicted Pr (D) > 0.5, True D defined as AD! = 0 | |||
Sensitivity | Pr (+|D) | 0.00% | |
Specificity | Pr (-|~D) | 100.00% | |
Positive predictive value | Pr (D|+) | 0.00% | |
Negative predictive value | Pr (~D|−) | 85.00% | |
False + rate for true ~D | Pr (+|~D) | 0.00% | |
False - rate for true D | Pr (−|D) | 100.00% | |
False + rate for classified + | Pr (~D|+) | 0.00% | |
False - rate for classified - | Pr (D|−) | 15.00% | |
Correctly classified | - | 85.00% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jehan, S.N.; Alahakoon, M.U.I. Digitalization of Public Services—An Input Output Logit Analysis. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2020, 3, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3040056
Jehan SN, Alahakoon MUI. Digitalization of Public Services—An Input Output Logit Analysis. Applied System Innovation. 2020; 3(4):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3040056
Chicago/Turabian StyleJehan, Shahzadah Nayyar, and Mudalige Uthpala Indeelinie Alahakoon. 2020. "Digitalization of Public Services—An Input Output Logit Analysis" Applied System Innovation 3, no. 4: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3040056
APA StyleJehan, S. N., & Alahakoon, M. U. I. (2020). Digitalization of Public Services—An Input Output Logit Analysis. Applied System Innovation, 3(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi3040056