Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Global Sensitivity of RUSLE Factors: A Case Study of Southern Bahia, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Distribution and In Vitro Bioaccessibility of Potentially Toxic Metals in Soils at Select Urban Parks at Eastern Canadian Cities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Viewpoint

The Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Shifted Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Rice Paddies

1
Department of Resources and Environmental Science, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
2
Key Laboratory of Arable Land Quality Monitoring and Evaluation (Yangzhou University), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou 225127, China
3
Jiangsu Wolvbao Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suqian 223814, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soil Syst. 2024, 8(4), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040124
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 18 October 2024 / Accepted: 14 November 2024 / Published: 2 December 2024

Abstract

:
In order to achieve reasonable yield while keeping environmental risks low, nitrogen fertilizer reduction has been adopted for in rice cultivation. The response of the soil microbial community structure to this management is not fully understood. In this study, the treatments comprising conventional farming practices (330 kg ha−1), reduced N application (270 kg ha−1 and 300 kg ha−1, respectively), and a control without N application were set up in order to reveal the effects of N application rate on the soil microbial community composition in rice paddies. It was discovered that Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi represented the most abundant bacterial phyla in all samples. The assembly of the soil bacterial community differed among the treatments, with NH4+-N, available phosphorus (AP), and organic matter (OM) as key drivers. The reduction of N application by 20% decreased soil NO3 up to 32% and increased the abundance of the total functional pathways, especially those associated with carbon fixation, N, S, and CH4 metabolism, whereas N reduction by 10% increase soil N accumulation and soil bacterial richness. In summary, a reduction of N fertilizer by up to 20% compared to the amount used in traditional practices could most effectively regulate the soil bacterial community composition and increase the predicted functional groups associated with N transformation, while maintaining lower soil nitrogen contents.

1. Introduction

Rice is a staple food for half of world’s population, and it plays a crucial role in Chinese agriculture, with its rice yield accounting for almost half of the world’s total production. Remarkable progress has been made in research regarding the productivity of the rice field ecosystem, and super high yields have been achieved using different agricultural management techniques [1]. One of these strategies is to increase N input, which is known to be critical for the increased yield of cereal crops [2]. However, the utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer in Chinese rice production is only 30%~35%, which is lower than the world average of 46%. The average amount of nitrogen applied in rice field production in the Yangtze Delta in China reached 250 kg hm−2, far exceeding the world average, at more than 1.2–1.6 times the recommended rate [3]. It is even recommended to use even less N for the aim of profit and ecosystem sustainability [2].
Nitrogen application holds significant ecological importance, and there is increasing attention paid to its impact on the global nitrogen cycle. The inefficiency of nitrogen fertilizer use, along with issues such as the deterioration of soils, nitrogen loss through leaching, N2O emissions, and the imbalance of soil microbial communities, have become focal points [1,4,5,6,7]. Additionally, the fluctuating dry–wet cycles affect the redox potential of paddy soil, leading to violent fluctuations in elements that impact microbial-driven bio-transforming processes [8,9,10].
The soil bacterial community is an important part of the soil ecosystem, which can decompose and transform soil organic matter, regulate the soil carbon and nitrogen cycles, and promote the soil biogeochemical process [11]. Nitrogen is the basic element regulating the composition and function of the soil bacterial community [12]. The reasonable application of nitrogen fertilizer can increase the nutrient availability of soil and change the physical and chemical properties of the soil, as well as the structure and function of the soil microbial community [13]. These changes, in turn, can promote plant growth and ensure plant health by accelerating soil nutrient circulation, inhibiting soil pathogens, and reducing disease incidence [11,12,13]. The diversity and richness of the soil microbial community structure is the basis of the soil nutrient cycle [14].
Soil microorganisms regulate N transformation in many ways, and the key microbial groups and essential functional genes involved in N cycling have been studied extensively [6,15]. A diversity of soil microorganisms, with the function of N-fixation, nitrification, denitrification, and ammonia oxidation, among others, and their succession may have a significant impact on the transformation of soil nitrogen and eventually, on the nitrogen use efficiency in regards to rice growth [16,17]. Studies have shown that soil microbes may be impacted by fertilization and other farming techniques [18], with contradictory results [19,20]. It is also suggested that biological attributes are more representative of agricultural land conditions than are physicochemical variables [21,22]. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding how fertilizer management affects the responses of the soil microbial community and functional groups involved in N activities.
Previous studies have demonstrated that in a reasonable range of N application, an increase in grain yield can be achieved, accompanied by an acceptable nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) [23]. This needs to be further elucidated in regards to the effects of N application on soil bacterial community composition and soil properties in rice cultivation This paper aims to reveal the following: (1) the effects of N fertilizer reduction on the major soil properties in a super rice production system; (2) the shift in soil bacterial community structure and the functional groups as a result of N reduction, along with the direct influencing factors. The results are expected to provide a scientific reference for N use regulation in sustainable agriculture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rice Plot Experimental Design

A field experiment was carried out at an experimental site in Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. This site belongs to the warm temperate monsoon climate zone, with an average annual temperature of 14.1 °C. The average annual precipitation is 892.3 mm. Wheat–rice rotation is the typical agricultural mode in this region. Wheat was the pre-crop, and the soil type was sandy loam. Organic matter (OM) (28.7 g kg−1), alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (108 mg kg−1), available phosphorus (A–P) (34.5 mg kg−1), and available potassium (126 mg kg−1) were all present in the soil.
The experiment was carried out using the completely randomized block arrangement (Figure S1), with the plot size of 5 × 8 m. The following treatments were adopted in the experiment: a blank control with no N fertilizer application (CK), a traditional farming management (TN) system, with a N application rate of 330 kg ha−1 (in the form of urea), two treatments with reduced nitrogen application, i.e., low nitrogen (LN), with a N dosage of 270 kg ha−1, and high nitrogen (HN), with a N dosage of 300 kg ha−1. For the treatments with N fertilizers, 60% of the N was applied as basal fertilizer, and 40% was used for topdressing. For all treatments, CaP2H4O8 and KCl were applied as basal fertilizers at the rates of 745 kg ha−1 and 240 kg ha−1, respectively.
The rice cultivar super rice (Oryza sativa L.) Ningjing 4 was used. The rice seedlings were transplanted on 20 June 2023. Three rice seedlings were planted per hill, at a density of 10 cm in width and 25 cm in length. Three replicate plots were set up for each treatment. The other agricultural managements were performed following traditional farming practices.

2.2. Soil Sampling

Soil samples were taken for analysis at the harvest stages of rice (10 November 2023). A total of 15 soil cores (diameter of 3 cm) were randomly taken from each plot, following a “S” route method. The surface soil from 0 and 20 cm in depth was collected with a auger, cleaned with ethanol, thoroughly mixed in a sterile zippered bag, and divided into two portions. One was transferred to a sterile falcon tube, pre-frozen at −80 °C, then freeze-dried, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (FD-1A-50, Jiangsu Tianling Instrument Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China), for molecular analysis, while the other part was air dried for the examination of the physiochemical properties of the soil.

2.3. Determination of Soil Physiochemical Parameters

To determine the physiochemical properties of the soil, the air-dried soils were thoroughly ground and sieved using a 0.15 mm mesh sieve. To determine the pH and electric conductivity (EC), a soil sample was diluted in DI water (1:2.5, m:v) using Leici pH and EC meters (Shanghai INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), respectively. The basic parameters, including soil organic matter, soil nitrate (NO3-N), ammonium (NH4+-N), alkali-hydrolyzable N, available phosphorus, and potassium were also determined following the protocol described by Bao et al. [24]. In short, the K2Cr2O7 external heating method was used to quantify soil organic matter; spectrophotometry was used to measure soil nitrate-N and ammonium-N. The alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method was used to quantify alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen. Soil available potassium was measured using flame photometry, and soil available phosphorus was measured using the Mo-Sb colorimetric method.
ANOVA was employed, using the statistical program SPSS (26.0), to determine whether there were differences in the soil physiochemical parameters among the treatments.

2.4. Soil Microbial Community Analyses

Using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), the complete soil bacterial DNA was recovered. By using bacterial primer sets 338F and 806R [25], the hypervariable V3–V4 regions of 16S rDNA were then amplified following the amplification conditions, as previously described [26]. The qualified PCR products were used for Illumina sequencing at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Miseq PE300, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
The sequence information on the bacterial community was analyzed using the Majorbio I-Sanger Cloud Platform (http://www.i-sanger.com, accessed on 27 May 2024). The qualified sequences after filtration were aligned against the SILVA132 database (https://www.arb-silva.de/, accessed on 30 May 2024), and the taxonomy details of the sequences were obtained. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were assigned based on 97% similarity [27]. Bacterial diversity estimator indices, including the ACE, Shannon, and Sobs indices, were calculated based on the OTU distribution after the number of reads in each sample was normalized.
The alpha diversity indices of the bacterial taxa were compared between treatments using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and ANOSIM analyses were performed to estimate the beta diversity [28]. Following that, the study employed redundancy analysis (RDA) to investigate the impact of soil properties on the composition variation among bacterial communities. Based on the Spearman correlation, the relationship between the dominating bacterial taxa and soil properties was computed and displayed as a heatmap.
The FAPROTAX [29] analysis method was utilized to predict the potential functions of the bacterial communities present in the soil samples, based on which, the sequences were classified into different functional groups, including C, N, S, P transformations, and other metabolic mechanisms. The quantity and proportion of various functional groups were obtained, especially those engaged in various N transformation. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the variations in the proportion of functional groups among the treatments.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of N Application on Soil Physiochemical Parameters

The major soil properties from different treatments are listed in Table 1. Not surprisingly, the lowest content of all forms of nitrogen (including ammonium, nitrate, and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen) was detected in the treatment without N application (CK), followed by that with low nitrogen input (LN), with the highest observed in the treatment employing a high nitrogen rate (HN) (p < 0.05). In comparison to traditional farming N applications, the practice of nitrogen fertilizer reduction decreased the amount of different forms of nitrogen in the soil. Soil NH4+-N, NO3-N, and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen decreased by 10.7%, 31.9%, and 5%, respectively. The N fertilizer reduction practice increased soil EC significantly when compared with that of other treatments. The soil in the control treatment displayed significantly higher concentrations of AP, AK, and OM (p < 0.05).

3.2. Effects of N Application on Bacterial Community Structure

Using Illumina sequencing, a total of 1,372,015 qualified sequences, with an average length of 428 base pairs, were retrieved from 24 soil samples. The diversity indices, including the Chao, ACE, Shannon, and coverage, represent the richness and evenness of the soil bacterial community. Table 2 lists the alpha diversity indices of the soil bacterial community calculated from the treatments. Overall, the treatment with the 300 kg ha−1 N application (HN) exhibited the highest Chao, ACE, and Shannon indices, indicating a high level of soil bacterial diversity and abundance in this treatment. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant variation between the treatments.
The study employed non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS) to create a figure that illustrates the differences in microbial communities across the various treatments. Nitrogen fertilizer management shifted the composition of the soil bacterial population (Figure 1), and the control sample without N application was clearly distinguished from the others. There was a significant variation among replicates of the traditional agricultural management system (TN), which was still different from the treatments with lower (LN) or higher N (HN) use. This indicates that the N application rate had a great impact on the soil bacterial community composition. The results of the ANOSIM test additionally indicated that there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the compositions of the soil bacterial communities among the treatments.

3.3. Soil Bacterial Community Composition

In total, 48 phyla and 1132 genera were obtained by the taxonomic analysis of the high-quality data from Illumina sequencing across all treatments. Figure 2 displays the taxonomic composition of the bacterial sequences at the phylum and genus levels. Proteobacteria was the most common phylum in all treatments, making up an average of 27.8% of all reads (Figure 2A). Chloroflexi (20.8%), Acidobacteria (16.4%), Actinobacteria (16.1%), Firmucates (5.01%), and Gemmatimonadetes (3.29%) were the next most abundant phyla. These first six phyla comprised 89.38% of the total bacterial abundance. With a proportion of 31.74% of all sequences, the largest percentage of Proteobacteria was found in treatment TN, or the traditional farming treatment, whereas the lowest ratio, 24.48%, was found in treatment HN, which used more nitrogen fertilizer. The proportions of each bacterial phylum in the samples were not statistically significantly different.
In Figure 2B, the sequences percentage > 1% of the bacterial taxa that were relatively numerous were listed. g__norank_f__norank_o__norank_c__Subgroup_6, g__norank_f__Anaerolineaceae, and Arthrobacter, which are members of the phylum Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Actinobacteria, respectively, were the most common bacterial genera. With ratios of 6.52%, 4.56%, and 4.5%, respectively, these three genera displayed the highest relative abundance under the LN (reduced nitrogen application) treatment. The relative abundance of the dominating taxa (>1%) varies little between treatments. However, a significant difference was observed only in the bacterial phyla with relative abundance less than 1%, which are often classified as rare taxa.
To identify the bacterial biomarker taxa in the paddy soils of different treatments, a linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) assessment was performed. The results demonstrated that significant bacterial taxa changed at the class level (Figure 3A) in the treatments. There were considerably higher bacterial biomarkers in CK than in other treatments (Figure 3B), with 12 and 14 taxa with LDA scores of 2~3 and 3~4, respectively. The treatment with the second most abundant biomarkers was the traditional agriculture (TN) treatment, followed by the increase N treatment. Reduced nitrogen treatment displayed the lowest number of biomarkers.

3.4. The Effects of Soil Properties on Bacterial Communities

Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to examine the relationship between the chemical characteristics of the soils and the distribution of the soil bacterial community structure (at the phylum level) in samples from different treatments (Figure 4). The first and second axes explained 48.05% of the total variance (RDA1 = 35.61% and RDA2 = 12.44%). The results demonstrated that the bacterial community structure in the traditional N application treatment was more affected by EC and soil ammonium-N content, whereas the increased nitrogen treatment was more influenced by soil pH and nitrate-N. The results are more complicated for the CK and LN treatments, as there was a significant variation among the replicates. Generally, soil organic matter concentration (r2 = 0.61, p = 0.01), available phosphorus (r2 = 0.51, p = 0.04), and NH4+-N content (r2 = 0.48, p = 0.04) were shown to be the main environmental factors influencing changes in the structure of the soil bacterial population.
To further study the effects of the soil physiochemical parameters on the relative abundance of prominent bacterial taxa (the top 10 phyla), the Spearman rank correlation approach was adopted, with the results listed in Table 3. There was a significant positive correlation between the relative abundance of Acidobacteria and Rokubacteria and the soil ammonium nitrogen content (AN), while there was a negative correlation between the relative abundances of Gemmatimonadetes and Latescibacteria and the soil’s available phosphorus (AP) and potasium (AK) contents. The phylum Rokubacteria was adversely affected by the organic matter content (OM) of the soil.

3.5. Functional Prediction of Microbial Groups

PICRUSt analysis was performed to predict the potential functions of the soil bacterial communities in the different treatments (Figure 5). The dominant functional pathway abundance varied among the treatments. Interestingly, the pathways involved in cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, and metabolism were the most enriched in the LN treatment. As compared to the control, the reduced nitrogen treatment increased the soil functional groups by 6.22%, on average. Also, the HN treatment showed higher abundances for all functional pathways, except for cell motility and signaling molecules and interaction, than did TN (Figure 5A). Further analyses on the energy metabolism pathways revealed that the predicted pathways associated with C fixation, methane production, and oxidative phosphorylation were relatively more abundant (Figure 5B). Similarly, the two treatments with reduced nitrogen application exhibited abundances of associated pathways for C fixation, CH4 metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation. LN also showed a higher abundance of N and S metabolism pathways. Overall, N fertilizer reduction was beneficial for cell growth and metabolism, with the best results observed when ~20% N was reduced.

4. Discussions

4.1. Soil Physicochemical Parameters as Influenced by N Fertilizer Reduction

The two main inorganic nitrogen sources in the soil, ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3), are essential for plant uptake. The efficiency of using nitrogen is significantly impacted by the conversion of nitrogen [30]. Previous results have shown that the reduction of N input increased N recovery efficiency and greatly reduced environmental risks [31]. This is in accordance with our result when 20% N fertilizer reduction was applied. Nevertheless, this experiment showed that when the N use rate was reduced by approximately 10%, rice soil nitrate, ammonium, and alkali-hydrolyzable N all increased. In this study, too much nitrogen input (TN) might have caused vigorous growth of the rice plants, accompanied by rapid nutrient uptake [32], leaving lower N accumulation in soils. Furthermore, using excess N may extend the nutritional growth and postpone rice maturity, which is detrimental to grain development [33]. Indeed, the rice yield analysis showed that, with a N fertilizer reduction, LN achieved a comparable yield to that of TN (Table S1), suggesting a high nitrogen use efficiency of the N fertilizer reduction treatments. Other soil nutrients, including soil available P and K, also declined in the traditional farming treatment, most likely as a result of the rapid growth of the rice plants [34].

4.2. Shifts in Bacterial Diversity and Community Composition

Fertilization techniques change the community makeup of the soil microorganisms by providing them with nutrients and energy for growth, which in turn mediates the soil biogeochemical cycles [35,36,37]. Similarly, this study demonstrated that while reducing 20% nitrogen decreased soil bacterial richness, reducing 10%r N improved both soil bacterial richness and evenness. The stimulation of copiotrophic bacteria, which use the K strategy for growth [38], was the reason for the enhanced bacterial richness that we also noticed in the previous study [26].
The NMDS study showed that the composition of the soil bacterial population varied significantly between the treatments. It is not surprising that samples without N treatment (CK) were distinct from the others, as N input may promote the proliferation of soil microorganisms [15]. Previous research showed a strong correlation between the N fertilizer application and the composition of the microbial population [39].
Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria were found to be the most common bacterial taxa in all treatments. Proteobacteria and Chloroflexi are known to be highly prevalent in rice fields [40] and to be largely linked to nitrogen turnover [15]. According to Bose et al. [41], Acidobacteria may also play a significant role in the conversion of NO3 to NH4 + in rice paddies. This is supported by the positive association found in Table 3 between bacterial relative abundance and NH4+ content. These were consistent with the results of the earlier study, which found that N fertilization and the proportions of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria—also referred to as copitrophic bacteria—increased [42].
The bacterial community structure of the soil was significantly impacted by the NH4+-N, A-P, and OM contents of the soil. The prospective nitrate-reducing microorganisms Acidobacteria and Rokubacteria showed a positive correlation with soil NH4+-N [41], but Gemmatimonadetes and Latescibacteria showed a positive correlation (p < 0.05) with AP, indicating that these microbes may be engaged in P cycling.
Microorganisms participating in many processes, including N fixation, ammonium and nitrite oxidation, denitrification, etc., were responsible for driving N transformation in soils [15]. Considering the bacterial functions, the LN treatment had the highest abundances of pathways detected, specifically those associated with carbon fixation, N, S, and CH4 metabolism. Thus, in order to improve our understanding of the function of soil ecosystems after the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer, future research should concentrate on both the impacts of a reduction of N fertilizer application on the phylogenetic diversity of bacteria, as well as the functional diversity of bacteria. Further, FAPROTAX analysis [43] was used to forecast the functional groups. It was shown that, except for the nitrification process, which was noticeably elevated in soil samples of the traditional farming N treatment, there was very little variation in the bacterial groups involved in N transformation, suggesting that the treatment was undergoing vigorous nitrification.

5. Conclusions

This study examined the soil characteristics and the dynamics in the soil bacterial population at rice harvest under reduced nitrogen treatment. It was discovered that when compared to the farmers’ traditional nitrogen application rate, a 10% N fertilizer reduction improved the contents of various forms of N, as well as the bacterial richness of the soil. Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi were the most common bacterial phyla observed throughout the treatments; only the phylum Acidobacteria showed a positive connection with soil NH4+ content. Soil NH4+-N, available P, and OM were the key soil parameters that influenced the assembly of the bacterial community composition. LN treatment had the highest pathway abundance, along with significantly higher ratios of the N transformation groups than noted for the control. In summary, reducing the application of N fertilizer up to 20% in comparison to amounts used in traditional practices could most effectively regulate the soil bacterial community composition and increase the predicted functional groups associated with N transformation, while maintaining lower soil nitrogen contents.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/soilsystems8040124/s1, Figure S1: A illustration of the plot distribution; Table S1: Rice yield components in different treatments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Q. and J.G.; methodology, S.X., X.Q., and J.G.; software, X.Q.; validation, X.Q., W.H. and J.G.; formal analysis, X.Q.; investigation, S.X., R.H. and W.Z.; resources, X.Q.; data curation, W.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Q.; writing—review and editing, S.X.; visualization, J.G., F.X. and W.H.; supervision, X.Q.; project administration, X.Q.; funding acquisition, X.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0200107) and the Suqian Science and Technology Program (L202209).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are availability upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Wujian Huang and Fulei Xu were employed by the company Jiangsu Wo Lvbao Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhang, F.; Cui, Z.; Chen, X.; Ju, X.; Shen, J.; Chen, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W.; Mi, G.; Fan, M.; et al. Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Adv. Agron. 2012, 116, 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, S.; Tian, Y.; Wu, K.; Ye, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Hu, M.; Li, H.; Tong, Y.; et al. Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture. Nature 2018, 560, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ju, X.T.; Xing, G.X.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, S.L.; Zhang, L.J.; Liu, X.J.; Cui, Z.L.; Yin, B.; Christie, P.; Zhu, Z.L.; et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3041–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, X.; Zheng, Y.; Lei, Y.; Xue, W.; Yan, G.; Liu, X.; Cai, B.; Tong, D.; Wang, J. Air quality benefits of achieving carbon neutrality in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 14878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Y.; Wu, W.; Yang, J.; Cheng, K.; Smith, P.; Sun, J.; Xu, X.; Yue, Q.; Pan, G. Exploring the environmental impact of crop production in China using a comprehensive footprint approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 824, 153898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choudhury, A.T.M.A.; Kennedy, I.R. Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2005, 36, 1625–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, P.; Jiang, M.; Jiang, Y.; Khan, I.; Zhou, W.; Wu, H.; Wu, X.; Shaaban, M.; Lu, J.; Hu, R. Prior nitrogen fertilization stimulated N2O emission from rice cultivation season under a rapeseed-rice production system. Plant Soil 2022, 471, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Tang, Y. Quantifying economically and ecologically optimum nitrogen rates for rice production in south-eastern China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 142, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Huang, D. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses by surface runoff and soil microbial communities in a paddy field with different irrigation and fertilization managements. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hua, W.; Luo, P.; An, N.; Cai, F.; Zhang, S.; Chen, K.; Yang, J.; Han, X. Manure application increased crop yields by promoting nitrogen use efficiency in the soils of 40-year soybean-maize rotation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Philippot, L.; Chenu, C.; Kappler, A.; Rillig, M.C.; Fierer, N. The interplay between microbial communities and soil properties. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 22, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gorfer, M.; Borruso, L.; Deltedesco, E.; Gichuhi, E.W.; Menge, D.M.; Makihara, D.; Praeg, N.; Cesco, S.; Mimmo, T.; Merbold, L.; et al. The effect of environmental parameters and fertilization practices on yield and soil microbial diversity in a Kenyan paddy rice field. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 176, 104495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.; Rhodes, G.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Plant growth stages and fertilization regimes drive soil fungal community compositions in a wheat-rice rotation system. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2018, 54, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cardenas-Alegria, O.V.; Dantas, C.W.D.; Lobato, E.M.S.G.; Da Silva, S.P.; Moraes, C.D.S.; Cruz, A.C.R.; Ramos, R.T.J.; Carneiro, A.R. Influence of soil management for soybean production under microbial diversity in amazon soils. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1024610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kuypers, M.M.M.; Marchant, H.K.; Kartal, B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cao, X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Kong, Y.; Pan, W.; Wu, L.; Jin, Q. Alternate wetting-drying enhances soil nitrogen availability by altering organic nitrogen partitioning in rice-microbe system. Geoderma 2022, 424, 115993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, Q.; Qian, Y.; Yu, Q.; Cao, Y.; Tao, R.; Zhu, M.; Ding, J.; Li, C.; Guo, W.; Zhu, X. Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application mitigated N losses and modified microbial community while improving wheat yield and N use efficiency. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 349, 108445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xie, Y.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, X.; Qiu, R.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Hong, C.; Zong, X.; Wang, Y.; Agathokleous, E.; Guo, X. Dissecting the combined effects of cultivar, fertilization, and irrigation on rhizosphere bacterial communities and nitrogen productivity in rice. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fan, F.; Yang, Q.; Li, Z.; Wei, D.; Cui, X.A.; Liang, Y. Impacts of organic and inorganic fertilizers on nitrification in a cold climate soil are linked to the bacterial ammonia oxidizer community. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 62, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Z.; Hou, H.; Zheng, Y.; Qin, H.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, J.; Wei, W. Influence of fertilisation regimes on a nosZ-containing denitrifying community in a rice paddy soil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, J.; Peng, H.; Ji, X.; Li, C.; Li, S. Effects of reduced inorganic fertilization and rice straw recovery on soil enzyme activities and bacterial community in double-rice paddy soils. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2019, 94, 103116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, P.; Jiang, M.; Khan, I.; Zhao, J.; Yang, T.; Tu, J.; Hu, R. Available nitrogen and ammonia-oxidizing archaea in soil regulated N2O emissions regardless of rice planting under a double rice crop**-fallow system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 340, 108166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Che, S.; Zhao, B.; Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Wei, L.; Lin, Z.; Hu, S.; Bing, S. Review grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice production regions in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 2456–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bao, S. Soil Agro-Chemistrical Analysis, 3rd ed.; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2007; pp. 268–270, 389–391. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dennis, K.L.; Wang, Y.; Blatner, N.R.; Wang, S.; Abdulrahman, S.; Trudeau, E.; Roers, A.; Weaver, C.T.; Lee, J.J.; Gilbert, J.A.; et al. Adenomatous polyps are driven by microbe-instigated focal inflammation and are controlled by IL-10-producing T cells. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 5905–5913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Ma, Y.; Di, L.; Qian, X.; Wang, G. Straw incorporation with nitrogen amendment shapes bacterial community structure in an iron-rich paddy soil by altering nitrogen reserves. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stackebrandt, E.; Goebel, B. Taxonomic note: A place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1994, 44, 846–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Faith, D.P.; Minchin, P.R.; Belbin, L. Compsitional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecogical distance. Vegetatio 1987, 69, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Louca, S.; Parfrey, L.W.; Doebeli, M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science 2016, 353, 1272–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anas, M.; Liao, F.; Verma, K.K.; Sarwar, M.A.; Mahmood, A.; Chen, Z.; Li, Q.; Zeng, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment: Agronomic, eco-physiological and molecular approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Biol. Res. 2020, 53, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, L.; Xie, H.; Wang, G.; Yuan, L.; Qian, X.; Wang, W.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.; et al. Reducing environmental risk by improving crop management practices at high crop yield levels. Field Crops Res. 2021, 265, 108123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mohana, K.M.; Pooja, S.; Govindhasamy, G.; Arasu, A.; Rajagopalan, B. Precision nitrogen management in aerobic system for maximising paddy (Oryza sativa L.) yields: A review. Crop Res. 2023, 58, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bai, Z.; Huang, J.; Zhu, L.; Cao, X.; Zhu, C.; Zhong, C.; Jin, Q.; Zhang, J. Effects of N application strategies on N leaching loss in paddy soil and N use characteristics in different super hybrid rice cultivars. Paddy Water Environ. 2020, 18, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, W.; Bao, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Geng, Y.; Shao, X.; Guo, L. Effects of dense planting with less nitrogen fertilization on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency in northeast china. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2021, 15, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oldroyd, G.E.D.; Leyser, O. A plant’s diet, surviving in a variable nutrient environment. Science 2020, 368, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, B.B.; Roley, S.S.; Duncan, D.S.; Guo, J.R.; Quensen, J.F.; Yu, H.Q.; Tiedje, J.M. Long-term excess nitrogen fertilizer increases sensitivity of soil microbial community to seasonal change revealed by ecological network and metagenome analyses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 160, 108349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Ao, G.K.L.; Qin, W.K.; Han, M.G.; Shen, Y.W.; Liu, M.L.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, B. Globally nitrogen addition alters soil microbial community structure, but has minor effects on soil microbial diversity and richness. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2023, 179, 108980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marshall, D.J.; Cameron, H.J.; Loreau, H. Relationships between intrinsic population growth rate, carrying capacity and metabolism in microbial populations. ISME J. 2023, 17, 2140–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ouyang, Y.; Norton, J.M. Short-Term nitrogen fertilization affects microbial community composition and nitrogen mineralization functions in an agricultural soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e02278-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, J.; Ni, T.; Li, J.; Lu, Q.; Fang, Z.Y.; Huang, Q.W.; Zhang, R.F.; Li, R.; Shen, B.; Shen, Q.R. Effects of organic–inorganic compound fertilizer with reduced chemical fertilizer application on crop yields, soil biological activity and bacterial community structure in a rice–wheat cropping system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 99, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bose, H.; Sahu, R.P.; Sar, P. Impact of arsenic on microbial community structure and their metabolic potential from rice soils of West Bengal, India. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 841, 156486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dai, Z.M.; Su, W.Q.; Chen, H.H.; Barberán, A.; Zhao, H.C.; Yu, M.; Yu, L.; Brookes, P.C.; Schadt, C.W.; Chang, S.X.; et al. Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreases bacterial diversity and favors the growth of Actinobacteria and Proteobactria in agro-ecosystems across the globe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 3452–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sansupa, C.; Wahdan, S.F.M.; Hossen, S.; Disayathanoowat, T.; Wubet, T.; Purahong, W. Can We Use Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa (FAPROTAX) to Assign the Ecological Functions of Soil Bacteria? Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. NMDS plots showing the variation in bacterial community composition in paddy soils as affected by N fertilizer use.
Figure 1. NMDS plots showing the variation in bacterial community composition in paddy soils as affected by N fertilizer use.
Soilsystems 08 00124 g001
Figure 2. The relative abundance of the predominant bacterial taxa at the (A) phylum (≥1%) and (B) genus (≥1%) levels in paddy soils from different nitrogen treatments.
Figure 2. The relative abundance of the predominant bacterial taxa at the (A) phylum (≥1%) and (B) genus (≥1%) levels in paddy soils from different nitrogen treatments.
Soilsystems 08 00124 g002
Figure 3. (A) LEfSe analysis of the significant biomarkers of the treatments at various taxonomic levels and (B) the calculation result of LDA scores. The taxa that were considerably enriched in treatments CK, TN, LN, and HN were indicated by red, blue, green, and pink dots, respectively. The bacterial taxa represented by yellow dots are those that do not vary between treatments.
Figure 3. (A) LEfSe analysis of the significant biomarkers of the treatments at various taxonomic levels and (B) the calculation result of LDA scores. The taxa that were considerably enriched in treatments CK, TN, LN, and HN were indicated by red, blue, green, and pink dots, respectively. The bacterial taxa represented by yellow dots are those that do not vary between treatments.
Soilsystems 08 00124 g003
Figure 4. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed the bacterial community structure in relation to major soil properties. NN: NO3-N; AN: NH4+-N; KN: alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen; AP: available p; AK: available K; EC: electrical conductivity; OM: soil organic matter.
Figure 4. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed the bacterial community structure in relation to major soil properties. NN: NO3-N; AN: NH4+-N; KN: alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen; AP: available p; AK: available K; EC: electrical conductivity; OM: soil organic matter.
Soilsystems 08 00124 g004
Figure 5. The predictions of functional pathway abundances (A) and energy metabolism pathways (B) of soil bacterial communities in different treatments. (a) cellular processes; (b) environmental information processing; (c) genetic information processing; (d) metabolism.
Figure 5. The predictions of functional pathway abundances (A) and energy metabolism pathways (B) of soil bacterial communities in different treatments. (a) cellular processes; (b) environmental information processing; (c) genetic information processing; (d) metabolism.
Soilsystems 08 00124 g005aSoilsystems 08 00124 g005b
Table 1. Major soil chemical properties in treatments with different nitrogen fertilizer rates.
Table 1. Major soil chemical properties in treatments with different nitrogen fertilizer rates.
TreatmentspHEC
μS cm−1
AN
mg kg−1
NN
mg kg−1
KN
mg kg−1
AP
mg kg−1
AK
mg kg−1
OM
g kg−1
CK6.67 ± 0.0792.8 ± 4.9 b5.02 ± 0.41 c3.46 ± 0.15 c115 ± 3.9 c88.8 ± 7.0 a149 ± 4.0 a21.3 ± 1.9 a
TN6.73 ± 0.13104.5 ± 7.1 ab6.55 ± 0.41 ab5.54 ± 0.12 b140.7 ± 2.2 b78.3 ± 5.6 b126.7 ± 7.3 b18.1 ± 1.6 b
LN6.65 ± 0.07112.9 ± 8.8 a5.85 ± 0.62 bc3.77 ± 0.63 c133.7 ± 2.9 b77.3 ± 1.1 b137.1 ± 11.7 ab20.2 ± 1.5 ab
HN6.783 ± 0.0688 ± 8.7 b7.44 ± 0.55 a8.19 ± 0.18 a160 ± 12 a77.9 ± 3.1 b133.6 ± 9.6 ab18.5 ± 0.9 b
Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the treatment within one column (LSD, p < 0.05). EC: electrical conductivity; AN: NH4+-N; NN: NO3-N; KN: alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen; AP: available p; AK: available K; OM: soil organic matter.
Table 2. The soil bacterial alpha indices for different treatments.
Table 2. The soil bacterial alpha indices for different treatments.
TreatmentsChaoACEShannonCoverage
CK5256.5 ±754.495516.6 ± 1328.46.71 ± 0.190.963
TN5131 ± 519.95123.3 ± 530.356.83 ± 0.160.965
LN5214.8 ± 371.765130.5 ± 349.36.82 ± 0.050.965
HN5560.9 ± 233.725574.3 ± 250.76.99 ± 0.10.961
Table 3. The correlation between the relative abundance of the major bacterial phyla and soil physiochemical parameters, as calculated by Spearman correlation analysis.
Table 3. The correlation between the relative abundance of the major bacterial phyla and soil physiochemical parameters, as calculated by Spearman correlation analysis.
PhylumNNANKNAPAKECpHOM
Proteobacteria0.090.39−0.060.01−0.020.52−0.01−0.37
Chloroflexi0.08−0.050.24−0.170.20−0.320.06−0.46
Acidobacteria0.240.58 *0.50−0.52−0.410.060.29−0.51
Actinobacteria−0.45−0.08−0.430.190.230.24−0.370.22
Firmicutes−0.36−0.13−0.330.250.330.12−0.400.33
Gemmatimonadetes0.190.550.44−0.80 **−0.69 *0.460.03−0.33
Bacteroidetes−0.10−0.56−0.170.230.33−0.530.070.17
Rokubacteria0.520.81 **0.59 *−0.48−0.390.220.42−0.58 *
Nitrospirae0.430.010.300.000.13−0.060.09−0.43
Latescibacteria0.570.500.83 ***−0.76 **−0.65 *−0.150.50−0.57
NN: nitrate-N; AN: ammonium-N; KN: alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen; AP: available p; AK: available K; EC: electrical conductivity; OM: soil organic matter. * represent a significant difference between the treatments (* 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qian, X.; Xie, S.; Hu, R.; Zhao, W.; Gu, J.; Huang, W.; Xu, F. The Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Shifted Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Rice Paddies. Soil Syst. 2024, 8, 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040124

AMA Style

Qian X, Xie S, Hu R, Zhao W, Gu J, Huang W, Xu F. The Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Shifted Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Rice Paddies. Soil Systems. 2024; 8(4):124. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qian, Xiaoqing, Shifan Xie, Rui Hu, Wenhui Zhao, Junfei Gu, Wujian Huang, and Fulei Xu. 2024. "The Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Shifted Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Rice Paddies" Soil Systems 8, no. 4: 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040124

APA Style

Qian, X., Xie, S., Hu, R., Zhao, W., Gu, J., Huang, W., & Xu, F. (2024). The Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Shifted Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Rice Paddies. Soil Systems, 8(4), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8040124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop