Next Article in Journal
Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of Limited Information Estimation Methods for the Two-Parameter Normal-Ogive Model with Locally Dependent Items
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparing the Robustness of the Structural after Measurement (SAM) Approach to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) against Local Model Misspecifications with Alternative Estimation Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Estimation of Standard Error, Linking Error, and Total Error for Robust and Nonrobust Linking Methods in the Two-Parameter Logistic Model

by
Alexander Robitzsch
1,2
1
IPN—Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Germany
2
Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB), Olshausenstraße 62, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Stats 2024, 7(3), 592-612; https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030036
Submission received: 29 April 2024 / Revised: 17 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robust Statistics in Action II)

Abstract

The two-parameter logistic (2PL) item response theory model is a statistical model for analyzing multivariate binary data. In this article, two groups are brought onto a common metric using the 2PL model using linking methods. The linking methods of mean–mean linking, mean–geometric–mean linking, and Haebara linking are investigated in nonrobust and robust specifications in the presence of differential item functioning (DIF). M-estimation theory is applied to derive linking errors for the studied linking methods. However, estimated linking errors are prone to sampling error in estimated item parameters, thus resulting in artificially increased the linking error estimates in finite samples. For this reason, a bias-corrected linking error estimate is proposed. The usefulness of the modified linking error estimate is demonstrated in a simulation study. It is shown that a simultaneous assessment of the standard error and linking error in a total error must be conducted to obtain valid statistical inference. In the computation of the total error, using the bias-corrected linking error estimate instead of the usually employed linking error provides more accurate coverage rates.
Keywords: item response model; linking; 2PL model; M-estimation; linking error; standard error; total error; robust linking; nonrobust linking item response model; linking; 2PL model; M-estimation; linking error; standard error; total error; robust linking; nonrobust linking

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Robitzsch, A. Estimation of Standard Error, Linking Error, and Total Error for Robust and Nonrobust Linking Methods in the Two-Parameter Logistic Model. Stats 2024, 7, 592-612. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030036

AMA Style

Robitzsch A. Estimation of Standard Error, Linking Error, and Total Error for Robust and Nonrobust Linking Methods in the Two-Parameter Logistic Model. Stats. 2024; 7(3):592-612. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Robitzsch, Alexander. 2024. "Estimation of Standard Error, Linking Error, and Total Error for Robust and Nonrobust Linking Methods in the Two-Parameter Logistic Model" Stats 7, no. 3: 592-612. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7030036

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop