Next Article in Journal
On the Alleged Locality in the Schrödinger Picture. Comment on Vedral, V. Locality in the Schrödinger Picture of Quantum Mechanics. Physics 2024, 6, 793–800
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Similar Bridge Between Regular and Critical Regions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Classicalization of Quantum Mechanics: Classical Radiation Damping Without the Runaway Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dynamical Casimir Effect: 55 Years Later

by
Viktor V. Dodonov
International Center for Physics, Institute of Physics, University of Brasilia, P.O. Box 04455, Brasília 70919-970, DF, Brazil
Physics 2025, 7(2), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/physics7020010
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 9 March 2025 / Accepted: 10 March 2025 / Published: 29 March 2025

Abstract

:
The paper represents a brief review of the publications in 2020 to 2024 related to the phenomena combined under the name of dynamical Casimir effect.

1. Introduction

In quite a broad field of matter–radiation interactions, the group of phenomena nowadays combined under the name of dynamical Casimir effect (DCE) occupies quite an important place. The history of these phenomena began fifty five years ago, when Gerald Moore published his paper [1], where he showed that motions of ideal boundaries of a one-dimensional cavity can result in the generation of quanta of the electromagnetic field from the initial vacuum quantum state. Since that time, these remarkable quantum phenomena (frequently referred to as the DCE afterwards [2,3]) have attracted high attention.
Nowadays, the term “dynamical Casimir effect” is applied to various phenomena, whose common is the amplification of vacuum quantum fluctuations of different fields (mainly electromagnetic) due to temporal variations in some parameters characterizing macroscopic systems. Professor Francesco Persico made significant contributions to these fields, especially such areas as atom–radiation interaction, quantum vacuum fluctuations, and Casimir and Casimir–Polder interactions; see refs. [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
References of several hundred publications related to the DCE in a broad sense can be found in the reviews [14,15,16,17,18]. One of the goals of the present paper is to provide an outline of the main results achieved in the five years after the most recent review [18]. Hence, this paper can be considered an extension of ref. [18].

2. Single-Mirror DCE

The DCE with single moving mirrors became an attractive topic after the pubications [19,20,21]. Fifty years later, this area continues to attract high attention.

2.1. One-Dimensional Models

The simplest models correspond to ( 1 + 1 )-dimensional space-time. The creation of a thermal radiation by a moving mirror has been considered in refs. [22,23,24,25]. The vacuum radiation of a massive scalar field in the case of a single flat mirror moving in ( 1 + 1 ) and ( 3 + 1 ) dimensions has been calculated in ref. [26].
Different models of partially reflecting moving mirrors [27] or static mirrors with time-dependent reflection coefficients [28,29,30,31,32] have been considered. Often, the influence of mirrors is described using Klein–Gordon equations of the form
t 2 x 2 + U ( x , t ) ϕ ( x , t ) = 0 ,
where a / a , and ϕ ( x , t ) represents the scalar field as a function of the space (x) and temporal (t) coordinates. In the case of thin mirrors, the effective potential U ( x , t ) is taken as a combination of the Dirac delta function and its space-derivative:
U ( x , t ) = λ 1 ( t ) δ [ x x 0 ( t ) ] + λ 2 ( t ) δ [ x x 0 ( t ) ] ,
where λ 1 ( t ) and λ 2 ( t ) can be arbitrary functions of time. Such models have been studied in refs. [28,29,30,31,32]. A microscopic model of a moving mirror in a single space dimension has been studied in ref. [33]. The mirror is modeled as a quantum oscillator with ponderomotive coupling to the field. Thus, the back-reaction from a quantum field to the dynamics of a moving mirror is taken into account. Another model taking into account the back-reaction has been considered in ref. [34].

2.2. Moving Mirrors in Several Dimensions

The DCE in the presence of a single thin and inhomogeneous flat mirror, modeled with a delta potential in four-dimensional (4D) space-time, has been studied in refs. [35,36]. Space-time quantum metasurfaces and microscopic models of moving dielectric mirrors as a collection of dipoles in which the center-of-mass coordinates are modulated in space and in time have been studied in refs. [37,38]. The sudden creation of a fast-moving mirror has been considered in ref. [39]. A detailed study of pair production by semitransparent moving mirrors with Neumann boundary conditions has been performed in ref. [40]. Time-dependent Dirichlet surfaces in ( d + 1 ) dimensions have been considered in ref. [41]. The DCE, due to the motion of a single mirror with a finite transverse size, has been studied in refs. [42,43]. It is shown that models using infinite metallic surfaces drastically overestimate DCE radiation.

3. Cavity DCE

The “most conventional ” directions of studies on the DCE are related to the evolution of the quantum electromagnetic field inside cavities with moving boundaries.

3.1. Single-Dimensional (1+1) Models

One-dimensional models of the DCE inside cavities have been extensively studied since Moore’s paper [1]. The following is a summary of the publications since 2020.
The discrete spectrum of photons created due to the DCE when one of two mirrors oscillates with relativistic maximal velocities has been calculated in ref. [44]. A case of two resonantly coupled modes has been considered in ref. [45]. Effective Hamiltonians have been used in refs. [46,47,48]. Time-dependent boundary conditions have been considered in ref. [49]. A massive scalar field inside a 1D cavity with ideal oscillating boundaries has been the subject of study [50]. The field amplification and generation of ultrashort narrow pulses between oscillating mirrors have been considered in refs. [51,52]. A case where the boundaries of a one-dimensional cavity move randomly has been studied in ref. [53]. The DCE for fermionic fields has been considered in refs. [54,55,56,57]. The possibility of converting vibrational excitations of the wall into fermion pairs has been investigated in ref. [58]. Numerical methods have been used in ref. [59]. A short review is given in ref. [60]. The behavior of a confined quantum field with moving boundaries in space-time with a screened scalar field has been studied in ref. [61], where the related Bogoliubov coefficients are calculated. The classical wave equation in a 1D cavity has been considered in ref. [62] in a case when a single wall moves under radiation pressure force (and apparently other external forces). Specifically, the phenomenology of this system is outlined when the moving boundary achieves large displacements and velocities (comparable with the wave velocity).

3.2. Hybrid Cavities

The term “hybrid” or “optomechanical” cavities is used for models taking into account the quantization of the cavity wall’s motion and/or the back-reaction of the electromagnetic field on the walls [63]. Such models have been considered, e.g., in refs. [64,65,66]. Typical single-mode hybrid Hamiltonians have the following structure:
H = ω c a a + ω b b b g a a b + b ( g / 2 ) a a + a a b + b ,
where the first term represents the free Hamiltonian of photons (cavity mode), the second term gives the free Hamiltonian of phonons (vibration of cavity wall), the third term represents the optomechanical interaction term, and the fourth term describes the DCE interaction; a ( a ) and b ( b ) represent the annihilation (creation) operators of photons and phonons, respectively; g is the coupling constant; ω c and ω b denote the frequencies of photons and phonons, respectively. More complete multi-mode Hamiltonians have been used in refs. [67,68]. The statistical properties of the electromagnetic field created in the cavity due to the DCE (such as squeezing effects) have been studied in ref. [69], where the models of the classical moving wall and its quantized counterpart are compared.
The models considered in refs. [70,71] include a two-level atom (with levels | g and | e ) inside the optomechanical cavity, adding the term
H at = ω e | e e | + λ a 2 | e g | + a 2 | g e |
to the Hamiltonian (3). Here, ω e denotes the transition frequency between the atomic states | g and | e , and λ represents the field-atom coupling constant.
Equation (4) means that the atomic transition | g | e couples the atom to the cavity mode through a two-photon process. The effect of two-photon hopping in the system of two cavities separated by a vibrating two-sided perfect mirror has been considered in ref. [72]. The correlations between the fields in two cavities separated by a moving mirror (whose motion is quantized) have been studied in refs. [73,74]. A one-dimensional “membrane-in-the-middle” optomechanical model has been considered in ref. [75]. The optical nonreciprocity phenomenon due to the DCE in a three-mode and two-port optomechanical cavity has been studied in ref. [76]. Ref. [77] has proposed a protocol for inducing and observing real mechanical excitations of a mirror enabled by the virtual photons in the ground state of a tripartite system, where a resonant optical cavity is ultrastrongly coupled to a two-level system (qubit) and, at the same time, optomechanically coupled to a mechanical resonator. The back-reaction problem in the cavity DCE has been considered in Ref [78]. Re. [79] has proposed a protocol to study the DCE in a cavity optomechanical system under the condition that the resonator frequency is much larger than the mechanical frequency. Another proposal in the same direction has been given in ref. [80], where it is claimed that “the mechanical frequency can be about two orders of magnitude smaller than the output photons”.

4. Circuit and Waveguide DCE

The DCE in quantum circuits has continuously attracted high attention. As a continuation of the breakthrough experiment [81], ref. [82] has investigated the entanglement of a stream of photon pairs, generated in a semi-infinite broadband transmission line, terminated by a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). Controllable multipartite Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering via the dynamical Casimir effect in the frame of superconducting quantum networks has been studied in refs. [83,84,85]. Bell’s inequality violation through dynamical Casimir radiation in a circuit quantum electrodynamical setup, where a relativistically moving mirror is simulated by variable external magnetic flux in a superconducting quantum interference device terminating a superconducting microwave waveguide, has been the subject of ref. [86]. A theory of parametric photon generation in the waveguides coupled to arrays of quantum emitters with temporally modulated resonance frequencies, interpreted as a dynamical Casimir effect, has been developed in ref. [87]. In ref. [88], it has been shown that a transmission line coupled to an externally driven superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), exhibiting the dynamical Casimir effect, can function as an autonomous cooler where the SQUID can be used as a work source to cool down the cavity modes. Strong amplification of particle creation in left-handed metamaterial transmission lines has been predicted in ref. [89]. Ref. [90] has proposed the use of a superconducting quantum circuit to study photon generation via the dynamical Casimir effect in an effective (simulated) one-dimensional double cavity divided by a dielectric membrane.

5. Interaction with Atoms and Detectors

When a two-level atom interacts resonantly with a coherent electromagnetic field, the polarizability of the atom can be modulated due to the Rabi oscillations between atomic levels. In the quantum vacuum, such time-dependent atomic polarizability can lead to the resonant generation of photon pairs, a phenomenon reminiscent of photon emission in the dynamical Casimir effect. This possibility has been discussed in Ref [91]. The average number of photons generated by the DCE in the dissipative cavity containing a two-level atom has been calculated in ref. [92].
A proposal to put a “cloud” of photodetectors (achieved using nitrogen vacancy color center defects) on a diamond membrane undergoing gigahertz flexural motion within a superconducting microwave cavity has been considered in ref. [93]. When the number of detectors exceeds some critical value, the system undergoes a transition to an inverted lasing phase, signaled by a “burst” peak in the average cavity photon number, yielding significantly enhanced, collective photon production from a vacuum.
A microscopic model of the single-mirror DCE, where a collection of atoms moving in phase mimics the oscillation of a material planar surface, has ben studied in ref. [94]. A similar model, where real boundaries (mirrors) are replaced with “metasurfaces” constructed from 2D atom arrays [95], has been developed in ref. [96]. Detailed reviews of recent advances in the amplification of quantum light–matter interaction and simulation of ultrastrong light–matter interaction, particularly in cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics and in cavity optomechanics, can be found in refs. [97,98].

5.1. Dynamical Casimir–Polder Effects

The emission of photons by moving atoms in the presence of mirrors has been studied in refs. [99,100,101,102]. The dynamical atom–wall Casimir–Polder effect after a sudden change in the atomic position has been considered in ref. [103]. The dynamical Casimir–Polder force between a two-level atom and the walls of different 1D cavities has been calculated in refs. [104,105]. The influence of the initial states of the atom on the force is analyzed. The case of a semi-infinite waveguide has been considered in ref. [106]. The friction force on an atom moving near a conducting plate has been calculated in ref. [107].
Effective Hamiltonians describing the interaction of the quantum electromagnetic field with atoms or molecules have been elaborated on in ref. [108]. These Hamiltonians (whose form depends on the field states considered) allow for considerable simplification of the calculation of the Casimir–Polder interactions, including in the presence of boundary conditions. Nonlocal dynamical vacuum field correlations in the Casimir–Polder interactions have been studied in ref. [109].
A promising platform to observe the dynamical Casimir effect using a graphene nanosheet has been suggested in ref. [110]. The Casimir friction force on an atom which moves close to a graphene plate has been calculated in ref. [111].

5.2. DCE and Qubits

A fast scheme for anti-DCE (a process in which photons or other system excitations are annihilated from the thermal state of the field due to variation in the system parameters), based on coupling a single-mode cavity to a qubit with time-dependent coupling strength, has been suggested in ref. [112]. The DCE in cavities with some modes resonantly coupled through a qubit (a two-level system) has been studied in ref. [113]. In this case, a limited number of photons can be created due to the modulation of the qubit’s transition frequency. This protocol admits several modulation frequencies. As a result, complex tripartite entangled states can be formed. A case where the modulation is applied to an artificial two-level atom that can be located even outside the cavity has been considered in ref. [114].
A general approach to the efficient description of resonant transitions in periodically modulated quantum systems has been developed in ref. [115]. A microscopic model for the dynamical Casimir effect without time-dependent boundary conditions has been considered in ref. [116]. The photons are produced due to the motion of a qubit inside a cavity. It is shown that under certain conditions regarding the qubit’s movement that do not depend on its physical properties, a large number of photons may be generated without changing the qubit’s state, as should be expected for a microscopic model of the mirror. The experimental requirements are discussed in detail.
The synchronization of qubits via the dynamical Casimir effect in a shared coplanar waveguide resonator terminated at one end by a superconducting quantum interference device has been considered in ref. [117]. A quantum Rabi model for a two-level system coupled to a quantized cavity mode under periodic modulation of the cavity–dipole coupling in an ultrastrong coupling regime has been considered in ref. [118]. It is shown how purely mechanical driving can produce real photons, depending on the strength and frequency of the periodic coupling rate.

6. DCE in Time-Dependent Media

The wave propagation and photonics in time-varying media has been the subject of a number studies considered in the reviews [119,120,121,122]. Here, I only address the recent publications somehow related to the DCE or similar effects. Luminal space-time crystals, where the structure moves at or close to the velocity of light, have been considered in ref. [123]. The emission of light from a radiation source placed inside a photonic time crystal has been studied in ref. [124]. It is found that radiation corresponding to the momentum bandgap is exponentially amplified, whether initiated by a macroscopic source, an atom, or vacuum fluctuations, drawing the amplification energy from the modulation.
A theory of weakly modulated “dynamical vacuum effects” in arbitrary nanostructured, dispersive, and dissipative systems has been presented in refs. [125,126]. Vacuum amplification effects at anisotropic temporal boundaries have been investigated in ref. [127]. Dynamical quantum vacuum amplification effects in temporal metamaterials have been considered in ref. [128]. Various aspects of the dynamical Casimir effect in moving media have been considered in ref. [129].
The possibility of ultra-strong light–matter coupling in the THz range has been demonstrated in ref. [130]. The results of ref. [130] may be of importance for studies of quantum vacuum radiation because such resonators can be optically modulated at ultrafast rates, apparently leading to the generation of non-classical light via the dynamic Casimir effect. The “photonic conductivity” effect and “photonic Hall effect” have been investigated in ref. [131]. Ref. [132] has used shortcuts to the adiabatic method and proposes implementing fast multi-photon down-conversion, which can rapidly create 2N photons from the quantum vacuum based on the counter-rotating effect of ultrastrong light–matter coupling. The energy for the produced photons is given by a high-frequency pump field. Such accelerated evolution can restrain the influence of decoherence during the evolution so as to generate Fock states from the vacuum with high fidelities.
Quantum vacuum amplification effects in time-varying media with an arbitrary time modulation profile have been considered in ref. [133]. It has been shown in ref. [134] that considering material nonlocality is necessary for obtaining an accurate, physically satisfactory, and self-consistent description of dynamical Casimir effects in time-varying dispersive systems. The relations between the DCE and “time refraction” effects have been discussed in ref. [135]. The “time reflection” phenomenon and its connection with the DCE and Cherenkov radiation have been considered in ref. [136]. The parametric amplification of the zero-point fluctuations in the spin modes of a two-component Bose–Einstein condensate, triggered by the dynamical evolution of the condensate density, has been investigated in ref. [137]. Analogs of the DCE in Bose–Einstein condensates has been considered in ref. [138].

7. Various Applications and Connections with the DCE

The main features of the DCE as a part of the wide area of “Casimir physics” have been briefly described in the recent reviews [139,140,141,142]. Some connections with the DCE (mainly in the context of cosmological/gravitational problems and their laboratory simulations) can be found in refs. [143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163]. For other remote connections, one is addressed to refs. [164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171]. A combination of two vibrating plates and a strong perpendicular electric field between them have been considered in ref. [172]. The authors predict a dramatic mutual enhancement of the DCE and the Schwinger effect (the creation of charged particles from a vacuum in strong electric fields [173]). Particle-pair creation by laser fields has been considered in ref. [174]. The quantum vacuum Sagnac effect has been the subject of ref. [175]. The ways to eliminate the negative influence of the DCE on the efficiency of quantum heat engines have been considered in ref. [176]. A quantum field heat engine powered by phonon–photon interactions has been considered in ref. [177].
Solutions to Moore equations [1] simulating adiabatically moving boundaries (when no DCE happens) have been found in refs. [178,179,180]. The relations between the DCE, shortcuts to adiabaticity, and quantum heat engines have been studied in ref. [181]. Some solutions to the Moore equation have been found in ref. [182]. Solutions to wave equations in domains with a moving boundary have been obtained in ref. [183]. The quantum dynamics of a Dirac particle in a 1D-box with a moving wall has been studied in ref. [184]. The dynamical confinement in a quantum box with a moving wall, described in terms of the Schrödinger equation with time-varying boundary conditions, has been considered in refs. [185,186].
Nonlinear effects in the DCE have been studied in refs. [187,188,189,190,191]. The normal (perpendicular to the planes) Casimir force between two conductive planes with isotropic conductivity that move laterally and with a constant relative velocity has been calculated in refs. [192,193]. The effects of quantum friction between moving bodies have been considered in refs. [194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203]. The relations between the quantum friction and geometric phase have been studied in ref. [204].
A graph model of the DCE has been considered in ref. [205]. In ref. [206], it is shown that the average number of created photons may be substantially increased if time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians could be engineered. Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians have been also used in ref. [207] to describe a quantum system of two super-conducting qubits that move at relativistic speeds and where each qubit is coupled to a resonator mode. In this model, the relativistic motion of the qubits resulted from the modulation of the time-varying coupling between the qubits and the resonator. Analogies with the DCE in connection with enhanced superconducting correlations after photoexcitation have been discussed in ref. [208]. Long-lived oscillations arise from the parametric generation of plasmon pairs due to pump-induced perturbation of the superconducting order parameter. A scheme of generating extremely weak squeezed light from the DCE process is proposed in ref. [209].

Entanglement and Decoherence

The decay and decoherence of the field after switching off the effective boundary modulation that generates the DCE is the subject of the study [210]. The enhancement of the decoherence of a two-level neutral particle sliding on a metallic surface in a vacuum has been discovered in ref. [211]. The dissipative evolution of quantum correlations due to the DCE in a superconducting waveguide has been considered in ref. [212]. The entanglement degradation between field modes in two cavities due to the dynamical Casimir effect, when one of the cavities is harmonically shaken, has been investigated in ref. [213]. It is shown that as the moving cavity is three dimensional, only two modes inside become coupled, and the entanglement either degrades asymptotically with time or oscillates, depending on the driving. On the other hand, as the cavity has an equidistant spectrum, the entanglement either vanishes asymptotically if it is driven with its fundamental frequency or gets a sudden death if it is driven with an uneven harmonic frequency. The dynamical Casimir effect in a double superconducting cavity in a circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture has been considered in ref. [214]. The parameters in the quantum circuit are chosen in such a way that the superconducting cavity mimics a double cavity, formed of two perfectly conducting outer walls and a dielectric wall, with arbitrary permittivity separating both halves.
Tripartite entanglement generated by the dynamical Casimir array composed of three superconducting waveguides has been considered in ref. [215]. The squeezing and entanglement due to the DCE in a cavity optomechanical system with optical bistability has been studied in ref. [216]. The entanglement dynamics in an optomechanical cavity has been studied in ref. [217]. Ref. [218] has considered a cavity resonator containing a two-sided perfect mirror. Although the mirror separates the cavity modes into two independent confined electromagnetic fields, the radiation pressure interaction gives rise to high-order effective interactions across all subsystems. Depending on the chosen resonant conditions, which are also related to the position of the mirror, 2 n -photon entanglement generation and bilateral photon pair emission have been studied.

8. Conclusions

This brief review gives the current panorama of studies related to the DCE. One can find that the interest in various manifestations of the DCE continues growing. Although the majority of publications discussed are purely theoretical, several suggestions on possible experiments have been put forward [77,79,80,93,96,110,116], though they have not yet been realized. A dynamic version of the magnonic Casimir effect [219] may also be apparently tested. One could also consider possible nonstationary versions of the “emergent experimental approaches” described in ref. [220] having in mind other areas of Casimir physics.
It might be appropriate to mention two possible ideas (although extremely speculative at first glance). One of the main difficulties in observing the DCE is the extremely small ratio v / c between the achievable velocity of the boundary v and the light propagation velocity c. The phase velocity can be diminished in quantum circuits and waveguides. This factor has already been used in experiments [81]. On the other hand, it is known that the group velocity can be nevertheless diminished almost to zero (down to a few m/s) in certain experiments [221]. It could be said that the group velocity has no relevance to the DCE, since it is related to the propagation of wave packets. However, it is known that the electromagnetic field arising inside the cavity due to the DCE, under certain conditions (at least in single-dimensional models), concentrates in narrow packets moving between the reflecting boundaries [51,52,222]. It is of interest considering such an implausible possibility in more detail. (For other proposals of using “slow light” to simulate relativistic effects, see, e.g., [223].)
Another possibility is to use thin slabs made of vanadium oxides and illuminate them periodically with powerful short laser pulses. Then, the initial dielectric slab becomes highly conducting, diminishing the effective optical length of the cavity periodically. Experimentally it was shown that this transition may be achieved in a sub-picosecond regime [224,225]. Hence, the idea deserves to be addressed in more detail. On the other hand, the possibility that just achieving high conductivity in thin layers will be not sufficient to transform the dream of the DCE in cavities into reality is not excluded [226].
An impressive number of more than 200 publications related to the DCE in the past five years shows that significant progress in this area may be expected in quite near future. Surely, experimental progress will be of the most importance. As it looks, certain breakthroughs to come from the area of hybrid cavities. From this perspective, the proposals of refs. [77,79,80,93,96,110,116] should be addressed in detail. Those proposals can presumably be implemented in laboratories. What concerns the theory, one of the challenging problems remains the completing the theory of field quantization in real dissipative cavities with time-dependent (e.g., moving) boundaries. A more moderate goal could be generalization of the effective approximate analytic solutions for a 1D ideal cavity with oscillating boundaries and Dirichlet boundary conditions [227,228] to a more realistic case, taking into account the effects of dissipation and more general (e.g., Robin) boundary conditions.

Funding

I acknowledge partial financial support from the Brazilian funding agencies the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF), grant number 00193-00001817/2023-43.

Acknowledgments

I thank the Guest Editors for the kind invitation to submit this paper as a contribution to the Special Issue Matter-Radiation Interactions–In Memory of Francesco Saverio Persico.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Moore, G.T. Quantum theory of the electromagnetic field in a variable-length one-dimensional cavity. J. Math. Phys. 1970, 11, 2679–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yablonovitch, E. Accelerating reference frame for electromagnetic waves in a rapidly growing plasma: Unruh–Davies–Fulling–DeWitt radiation and the nonadiabatic Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 1742–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schwinger, J. Casimir energy for dielectrics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 4091–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leonardi, C.; Persico, F.; Vetri, G. Dicke model and the theory of driven and spontaneous emission. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1986, 9, 1–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Compagno, G.; Passante, R.; Persico, F. Atom-Field Interactions and Dressed Atoms; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Passante, R.; Persico, F. Time-dependent Casimir–Polder forces and partially dressed states. Phys. Lett. A 2003, 312, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Passante, R.; Persico, F.; Rizzuto, L. Spatial correlations of vacuum fluctuations and the Casimir–Polder potential. Phys. Lett. A 2003, 316, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rizzuto, L.; Passante, R.; Persico, F. Dynamical Casimir–Polder energy between an excited- and a ground-state atom. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 70, 012107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Passante, R.; Persico, F.; Rizzuto, L. Vacuum field correlations and three-body Casimir–Polder potential with one excited atom. J. Mod. Opt. 2005, 52, 1957–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Passante, R.; Persico, F.; Rizzuto, L. Causality, non-locality and three-body Casimir–Polder energy between three ground-state atoms. J. Phys. B 2006, 39, S685–S694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cirone, M.A.; Compagno, G.; Palma, G.M.; Passante, R.; Persico, F. Casimir–Polder potentials as entanglement probe. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2007, 78, 30003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Passante, R.; Persico, F.; Rizzuto, L. Nonlocal field correlations and dynamical Casimir–Polder forces between one excited- and two ground-state atoms. J. Phys. B 2007, 40, 1863–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rizzuto, L.; Passante, R.; Persico, F. Nonlocal properties of dynamical three-body Casimir–Polder forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 240404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dodonov, V.V. Nonstationary Casimir effect and analytical solutions for quantum fields in cavities with moving boundaries. In Modern Nonlinear Optics; Evans, M.W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 309–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dodonov, V.V. Current status of the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Scr. 2010, 82, 038105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dalvit, D.A.R.; Maia Neto, P.A.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Fluctuations, dissipation and the dynamical Casimir effect. In Casimir Physics; Dalvit, D., Milonni, P., Roberts, D., da Rosa, F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 419–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nation, P.D.; Johansson, J.R.; Blencowe, M.P.; Nori, F. Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dodonov, V. Fifty years of the Dynamical Casimir Effect. Physics 2020, 2, 67–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. DeWitt, B.S. Quantum field theory in curved spacetime. Phys. Rep. 1975, 19, 295–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fulling, S.A.; Davies, P.C.W. Radiation from a moving mirror in two-dimensional space-time: Conformal anomaly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Engin. Sci. 1976, 348, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davies, P.C.W.; Fulling, S.A. Radiation from moving mirrors and from black holes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Engin. Sci. 1977, 356, 237–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Good, M.R.R.; Linder, E.V.; Wilczek, F. Finite thermal particle creation of Casimir light. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2020, 35, 2040006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Good, M.; Abdikamalov, E. Radiation from an inertial mirror horizon. Universe 2020, 6, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Good, M.R.R.; Linder, E.V. Light and Airy: A simple solution for relativistic quantum acceleration radiation. Universe 2021, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fernández-Silvestre, D.; Good, M.R.R.; Linder, E.V. Upon the horizon’s verge: Thermal particle creation between and approaching horizons. Class. Quant. Grav. 2022, 39, 235008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cao, Y.-S. Vacuum radiation from massive scalar field. Universe 2022, 8, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Good, M.R.R.; Lapponi, A.; Luongo, O.; Mancini, S. Quantum communication through a partially reflecting accelerating mirror. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 105020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Silva, J.D.L.; Braga, A.N.; Rego, A.L.C.; Alves, D.T. Motion induced by asymmetric excitation of the quantum vacuum. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 125019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rego, A.L.C.; Braga, A.N.; Silva, J.D.L.; Alves, D.T. Dynamical Casimir effect enhanced by decreasing the mirror reflectivity. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 025013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gorban, M.J.; Julius, W.D.; Cleaver, G.B. The asymmetric dynamical Casimir effect. Physics 2023, 5, 398–422, Erratum in Physics 2024, 6, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gorban, M.J.; Julius, W.D.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Cleaver, G.B. Interference phenomena in the asymmetric dynamical Casimir effect for a single δ-δ mirror. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 096037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gorban, M.J.; Julius, W.D.; Brown, P.M.; Matulevich, J.A.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Cleaver, G.B. First- and second-order forces in the asymmetric dynamical Casimir effect for a single δ-δ mirror. Physics 2024, 6, 760–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Butera, S. Noise and dissipation on a moving mirror induced by the dynamical Casimir emission. J. Phys. Photon. 2023, 5, 045003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, P.; Reyes, I.A.; Wintergerst, J. Relativistic dynamics of moving mirrors in CFT2: Quantum backreaction and black holes. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 065010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lin, K.-N.; Chou, C.-E.; Chen, P. Particle production by a relativistic semitransparent mirror in (1 + 3)D Minkowski spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 025014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Franchino-Viñas, S.A.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Effective action for delta potentials: Spacetime-dependent inhomogeneities and Casimir self-energy. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 065006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kort-Kamp, W.J.M.; Azad, A.K.; Dalvit, D.A.R. Space-time quantum metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 043603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dalvit, D.A.R.; Kort-Kamp, W.J.M. Shaping dynamical Casimir photons. Universe 2021, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhakenuly, A.; Temirkhan, M.; Good, M.R.R.; Chen, P. Quantum power distribution of relativistic acceleration radiation: Classical electrodynamic analogies with perfectly reflecting moving mirrors. Symmetry 2021, 13, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahmadiniaz, N.; Franchino-Viñas, S.A.; Manzo, L.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Local Neumann semitransparent layers: Resummation, pair production, and duality. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 105022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fosco, C.D.; Guntsche, B.C. Quantum dissipative effects for a real scalar field coupled to a time-dependent Dirichlet surface in d+1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 105021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lin, K.-N.; Chen, P. Particle production by a relativistic semitransparent mirror of finite size and thickness. Eur. Phys. J. C 2024, 84, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alonso, L.; Matos, G.C.; Impens, F.; Maia Neto, P.A.; de Melo e Souza, R. Multipole approach to the dynamical Casimir effect with finite-size scatterers. Entropy 2024, 26, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alves, D.T.; Granhen, E.R.; Alves, J.P.d.S.; Lima, W.A. Relativistic bands in the discrete spectrum of created particles in an oscillating cavity. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 125012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ramos-Prieto, I.; Román-Ancheyta, R.; Récamier, J.; Moya-Cessa, H.M. Exact solution of a non-stationary cavity with one intermode interaction. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2021, 38, 2873–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Trubilko, A.I.; Basharov, A.M. Effective quantum oscillator of a cavity with oscillating parameters. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2021, 132, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramos-Prieto, I.; Román-Ancheyta, R.; Soto-Eguibar, F.; Récamier, J.; Moya-Cessa, H.M. Temporal factorization of a nonstationary electromagnetic cavity field. Phys. Rev. A 2023, 108, 033720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. de Oliveira, G.; Céleri, L.C. Thermodynamic entropy production in the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 109, 012807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lobanov, I.S.; Trifanov, A.I.; Trifanova, E.S.; Popov, I.Y.; Fedorov, E.; Pravdin, K.V.; Moskalenko, M.A. Photon generation in resonator with time dependent boundary conditions. Nanosyst. Phys. Chem. Math. 2021, 12, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barbado, L.C.; Báez-Camargo, A.L.; Fuentes, I. Evolution of confined quantum scalar fields in curved spacetime. Part II Spacetimes with moving boundaries in any synchronous gauge. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rosanov, N.N. Amplification of the electric area of a pulse during reflections from a moving mirror. Opt. Spectrosc. 2022, 130, 1126–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koutserimpas, T.T.; Valagiannopoulos, C. Electromagnetic fields between moving mirrors: Singular waveforms inside Doppler cavities. Opt. Expr. 2023, 31, 5087–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mantiñan, M.; Mazzitelli, F.D.; Trombetta, L.G. Stochastic particle creation: From the dynamical Casimir effect to cosmology. Entropy 2023, 25, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Francica, G. Dynamical Casimir effect and work statistics in fermionic fields. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2022, 590, 126686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fosco, C.D.; Hansen, G. Dynamical Casimir effect from fermions in an oscillating bag in 1+1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 016004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fosco, C.D.; Hansen, G. Dynamical Casimir effect for fermions in 2+1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 056005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fosco, C.D.; Hansen, G. Fermionic dynamical Casimir effect: Magnus expansion. Ann. Phys. 2024, 471, 169841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ferreri, A. Quantum vibrational mode in a cavity confining a massless spinor field. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 052204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Martín-Caro, A.G.; García-Moreno, G.; Olmedo, J.; Sánchez Velázquez, J.M. Classical and quantum field theory in a box with moving boundaries: A numerical study of the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 025007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Juárez-Aubry, B.A.; Weder, R. A short review of the Casimir effect with emphasis on dynamical boundary conditions. Supl. Rev. Mex. Fís. 2022, 3, 020714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Báez-Camargo, A.L.; Hartley, D.; Käding, C.; Fuentes, I. Dynamical Casimir effect with screened scalar fields. AVS Quant. Sci. 2024, 6, 045001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Michel, G. Coupled dynamics of a wave and moving boundary. Compt. Rend. Phys. 2025, 26, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Barzanjeh, S.; Xuereb, A.; Gröblacher, S.; Paternostro, M.; Regal, C.A.; Weig, E.M. Optomechanics for quantum technologies. Nat. Phys. 2022, 18, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tanaka, S.; Kanki, K. The dynamical Casimir effect in a dissipative optomechanical cavity interacting with photonic crystal. Physics 2020, 2, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tanaka, S.; Kanki, K. Dissipative dynamical Casimir effect in terms of complex spectral analysis in the symplectic Floquet space. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 12A107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nian, L.-L.; Lü, J.-T. Heat transfer mediated by the dynamical Casimir effect in an optomechanical system. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 063510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ferreri, A.; Pfeifer, H.; Wilhelm, F.K.; Hofferberth, S.; Bruschi, D.E. Interplay between optomechanics and the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 033502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ferreri, A.; Bruschi, D.E.; Wilhelm, F.K.; Nori, F.; Macrì, V. Phonon-photon conversion as mechanism for cooling and coherence transfer. Phys. Rev. Res. 2024, 6, 023320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, Z.-J.; Li, N.; Wei, M.-S.; Liao, M.-J.; Liang, Y.-B.; Xu, J.; Yang, Y.-P. Squeezing characteristics of cavity field in dynamic Casimir effect. Phys. Lett. A 2024, 525, 129852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, B.; Hu, J.-M.; Macrì, V.; Xiang, Z.-L.; Nori, F. Coherent resonant coupling between atoms and a mechanical oscillator mediated by cavity-vacuum fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Res. 2023, 5, 013075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lan, Z.-L.; Chen, Y.-W.; Cheng, L.-Y.; Chen, L.; Ye, S.-Y.; Zhong, Z.R. Dynamical Casimir effect in a hybrid cavity optomechanical system. Quant. Inf. Proc. 2024, 23, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Russo, E.; Mercurio, A.; Mauceri, F.; Lo Franco, R.; Nori, F.; Savasta, S.; Macrì, V. Optomechanical two-photon hopping. Phys. Rev. Res. 2023, 5, 013221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Armata, F.; Butera, S.; Montalbano, F.; Passante, R.; Rizzuto, L. Field observables near a fluctuating boundary. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2533, 012042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Montalbano, F.; Armata, F.; Rizzuto, L.; Passante, R. Spatial correlations of field observables in two half-spaces separated by a movable perfect mirror. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 056007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lara, L.P.; Weder, R.; Castaños-Cervantes, L.O. Membrane-in-the-middle optomechanical system and structural frequencies. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2024, 57, 345301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ullah, M.; Mikki, S. Optical nonreciprocity in a multimode cavity optomechanical system controlled by dynamic Casimir force. Adv. Quant. Technol. 2024, 7, 2400007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Minganti, F.; Mercurio, A.; Mauceri, F.; Scigliuzzo, M.; Savasta, S.; Savona, V. Phonon pumping by modulating the ultrastrong vacuum. SciPost Phys. 2024, 17, 027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xie, Y.-C.; Butera, S.; Hu, B.-L. Optomechanical backreaction of quantum field processes in dynamical Casimir effect. Compt. Rend. Phys. 2024, 25. in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Qin, W.; Song, J.; Xia, Y. Exploring the dynamical Casimir effect via resonator frequency modulations. Opt. Expr. 2025, 33, 8095–8111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jiang, T.-H.; Jing, J. Realizing a mechanical dynamical Casimir effect with a low-frequency oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 2025, 111, 022811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wilson, C.M.; Johansson, G.; Pourkabirian, A.; Simoen, M.; Johansson, J.R.; Duty, T.; Nori, F.; Delsing, P. Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit. Nature 2011, 479, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Schneider, B.H.; Bengtsson, A.; Svensson, I.M.; Aref, T.; Johansson, G.; Bylander, J.; Delsing, P.P. Observation of broadband entanglement in microwave radiation from a single time-varying boundary condition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 140503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, M.; Long, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, X. Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering and monogamy relations in controllable dynamical Casimir arrays. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 042435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sun, B.; Long, Y.; Zheng, T.; Zhang, X. Quantum synchronization and controllable Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering of a dynamical Casimir waveguide system composed of giant atoms. Phys. Lett. A 2024, 511, 129561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, R.; Long, Y.; Zhang, X. Quantum manipulation of asymmetric Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering in controllable dynamical Casimir arrays. Chin. Phys. B 2025, 34, 020307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chatterjee, R.; Majumdar, A.S. Bell-inequality violation by dynamical Casimir photons in a superconducting microwave circuit. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 042224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vyatkin, E.S.; Poshakinskiy, A.V.; Poddubny, A.N. Resonant parametric photon generation in waveguide-coupled quantum emitter arrays. Phys. Rev. A 2023, 108, 023715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kadijani, S.S.; Del Grosso, N.; Schmidt, T.L.; Farias, M.B. Dynamical Casimir cooling in circuit QED systems. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 245417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ferreri, A.; Bruschi, D.E.; Wilhelm, F.K. Particle creation in left-handed metamaterial transmission lines. Phys. Rev. Res. 2024, 6, 033204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sansó, J.P. L; Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Villar, P.I. Superconducting quantum circuit to simulate the dynamical Casimir effect in a double cavity. Phys. Rev. A 2025, 111, 013714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lo, L.Z.; Fong, P.T.; Law, C.K. Dynamical Casimir effect in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 102, 033703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, J.; Long, Y.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, T. Dynamical Casimir effect in a dissipative system. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2021, 60, 2227–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, H.; Blencowe, M. Coherently amplifying photon production from vacuum with a dense cloud of accelerating photodetectors. Commun. Phys. 2021, 4, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Impens, F.; de Melo e Souza, R.; Matos, G.C.; Maia Neto, P.A. Dynamical Casimir effects with atoms: From the emission of photon pairs to geometric phases. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2022, 138, 30001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bekenstein, R.; Pikovski, I.; Pichler, H.; Shahmoon, E.; Yelin, S.F.; Lukin, M.D. Quantum metasurfaces with atom arrays. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tobar, G.; Foo, J.; Qvarfort, S.; Costa, F.; Bekenstein, R.; Zych, M. Quantum metasurfaces as probes of vacuum particle content. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.03838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Forn-Díaz, P.; Lamata, L.; Rico, E.; Kono, J.; Solano, E. Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019, 91, 025005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Qin, W.; Kockum, A.F.; Muñoz, C.S.; Miranowicz, A.; Nori, F. Quantum amplification and simulation of strong and ultrastrong coupling of light and matter. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1078, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dolan, B.P.; Hunter-McCabe, A.; Twamley, J. Shaking photons from the vacuum: Acceleration radiation from vibrating atoms. New J. Phys. 2020, 22, 033026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Reina, M.; Domina, M.; Ferreri, A.; Fiscelli, G.; Noto, A.; Passante, R.; Rizzuto, L. Collective spontaneous emission of two entangled atoms near an oscillating mirror. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 033710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fosco, C.D.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Motion-induced radiation due to an atom in the presence of a graphene plane. Universe 2021, 7, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fosco, C.D.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Motion induced excitation and electromagnetic radiation from an atom facing a thin mirror. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 065005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Noto, A.; Passante, R.; Rizzuto, L.; Spagnolo, S. Dynamical atom–wall Casimir–Polder effect after a sudden change of the atomic position. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2533, 012041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Long, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Yang, H.; Zheng, T. Dynamical Casimir-Polder force on a two-level atom with superposition state in a cavity comprising a dielectric. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jin, Z.; Wang, W.; Long, Y.; Tian, T.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, T. Dynamical Casimir–Polder force between a two-level atom with different initial states and a dissipative cavity. Laser Phys. 2021, 31, 115203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jin, Z.; Tian, T.; Wang, W.; Long, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, T. Dynamical Casimir–Polder force in a semi-infinite rectangle waveguide. Laser Phys. 2022, 32, 025203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Guo, X.; Milton, K.A.; Kennedy, G.; Pourtolami, N. Quantum friction in the presence of a perfectly conducting plate. Phys. Rev. A 2023, 107, 062812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Passante, R.; Rizzuto, L. Effective Hamiltonians in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Passante, R.; Rizzuto, L. Nonlocal static and dynamical vacuum field correlations and Casimir–Polder interactions. Entropy 2023, 25, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zeng, X.; Zubairy, M.S. Graphene plasmon excitation with ground-state two-level quantum emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 117401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fernández, A.; Fosco, C.D. Spatial dependence of Casimir friction in graphene. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 116010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dodonov, A.V. Novel scheme for anti-dynamical Casimir effect using nonperiodic ultrastrong modulation. Phys. Lett. A 2020, 384, 126685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dodonov, A.V. Dynamical Casimir effect in cavities with two modes resonantly coupled through a qubit. Phys. Lett. A 2020, 384, 126837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. de Paula, M.V.S.; Sinesio, W.W.T.; Dodonov, A.V. Ancilla-assisted generation of photons from vacuum via time-modulation of extracavity qubit. Entropy 2023, 25, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sainz, I.; García, A.; Klimov, A.B. Effective and efficient resonant transitions in periodically modulated quantum systems. Quantum Rep. 2021, 3, 173–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Agustí, A.; García-Alvarez, L.; Solano, E.; Sabín, C. Qubit motion as a microscopic model for the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 062201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mitarai, H.; Hasegawa, Y. Quantum synchronization of qubits via the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 110, 043719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Akbari, K.; Nori, F.; Hughes, S. Floquet engineering the quantum Rabi model in the ultrastrong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 063602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lang, S.C.; Schützhold, R.; Unruh, W.G. Quantum radiation in dielectric media with dispersion and dissipation. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 125020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Galiffi, E.; Tirole, R.; Yin, S.; Li, H.; Vezzoli, S.; Huidobro, P.A.; Silveirinha, M.G.; Sapienza, R.; Alù, A.; Pendry, J. Photonics of time-varying media. Adv. Photon. 2022, 4, 014002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Koutserimpas, T.T.; Monticone, F. Time-varying media, dispersion, and the principle of causality. Opt. Mater. Expr. 2024, 14, 1222–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Pendry, J.B.; Horsley, S.A.R. QED in space-time varying materials. APL Quantum 2024, 1, 020901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pendry, J.; Galiffi, E.; Huidobro, P. Gain in time-dependent media—A new mechanism. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2021, 38, 3360–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lyubarov, M.; Lumer, Y.; Dikopoltsev, A.; Lustig, E.; Sharabi, Y.; Segev, M. Amplified emission and lasing in photonic time crystals. Science 2022, 377, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Sloan, J.; Rivera, N.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Soljačić, M. Casimir light in dispersive nanophotonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 053603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sloan, J.; Rivera, N.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Soljačić, M. Controlling two-photon emission from superluminal and accelerating index perturbations. Nat. Phys. 2022, 18, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Vázquez-Lozano, J.E.; Liberal, I. Shaping the quantum vacuum with anisotropic temporal boundaries. Nanophotonics 2023, 12, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vázquez-Lozano, J.E.; Liberal, I. Incandescent temporal metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Linowski, T.; Rudnicki, L. Classicality of the Bogoliubov transformations and the dynamical Casimir effect through the reduced state of the field. Acta Phys. Polon. A 2023, 6, S95–S106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Goulain, P.; Deimert, C.; Jeannin, M.; Pirotta, S.; Pasek, W.J.; Wasilewski, Z.; Colombelli, R.; Manceau, J.-M. THz ultra-strong light-matter coupling up to 200 K with continuously-graded parabolic quantum wells. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2202724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Silveirinha, M.G. Shaking photons out of a topological material. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 205142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhou, X.-D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.-B.; Chen, Y.-H.; Qin, W.; Ning, Y.; Xia, Y. Fast generation of 2N-photon Fock states using shortcuts to adiabaticity and ultrastrong light-matter coupling. Ann. Phys. 2023, 535, 2200348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ganfornina-Andrades, A.; Vázquez-Lozano, J.E.; Liberal, I. Quantum vacuum amplification in time-varying media with arbitrary temporal profiles. Phys. Rev. Res. 2024, 6, 043320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gangaraj, S.A.H.; Hanson, G.W.; Monticone, F. Dynamical Casimir effects: The need for nonlocality in time-varying dispersive nanophotonics. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 110, L041502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Mendonça, J.T. Time refraction and spacetime optics. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Svidzinsky, A. Time reflection of light from a quantum perspective and vacuum entanglement. Opt. Expr. 2024, 32, 15623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Butera, S.; Carusotto, I. Particle creation in the spin modes of a dynamically oscillating two-component Bose–Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 083503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tettamanti, M.; Parola, A. The Dynamical Casimir Effect in quasi-one-dimensional Bose condensates: The breathing ring. Compt. Rend. Phys. 2024, 25. in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Gong, T.; Corrado, M.R.; Mahbub, A.R.; Shelden, C.; Munday, J.N. Recent progress in engineering the Casimir effect–Applications to nanophotonics, nanomechanics, and chemistry. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Woods, L.M.; Krüger, M.; Dodonov, V.V. Perspective on some recent and future developments in Casimir interactions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Elizalde, E. Zeta functions and the cosmos—A basic brief review. Universe 2021, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Schützhold, R. Ultra-cold atoms as quantum simulators for relativistic phenomena. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2501.03785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wilson, J.H.; Sorge, F.; Fulling, S.A. Tidal and nonequilibrium Casimir effects in free fall. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 065007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sorge, F. Falling from rest: Particle creation in a dropped cavity. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ford, L.H. Cosmological particle production: A review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 116901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Isoard, M.; Milazzo, N.; Pavloff, N.; Giraud, O. Bipartite and tripartite entanglement in a Bose–Einstein acoustic black hole. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 104, 063302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Steinhauer, J.; Abuzarli, M.; Aladjidi, T.; Bienaimé, T.; Piekarski, C.; Liu, W.; Giacobino, E.; Bramati, A.; Glorieux, Q. Analogue cosmological particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Good, M.R.R.; Linder, E.V. Modified Schwarzschild metric from a unitary accelerating mirror analog. New J. Phys. 2021, 23, 043007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Good, M.R.R.; Foo, J.; Linder, E.V. Accelerating boundary analog of a Kerr black hole. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 085011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fernández-Silvestre, D.; Foo, J.; Good, M.R.R. On the duality of Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime and moving mirror. Class. Quant. Grav. 2022, 39, 055006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Good, M.R.R.; Linder, E.V. Möbius mirrors. Class. Quant. Grav. 2022, 39, 105003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Good, M.R.R.; Linder, E.V. Stopping to reflect: Asymptotic static moving mirrors as quantum analogs of classical radiation. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 845, 138124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Good, M.R.R.; Davies, P.C.W. Infrared acceleration radiation. Found. Phys. 2023, 53, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ievlev, E.; Good, M.R.R. Larmor temperature, Casimir dynamics, and Planck’s law. Physics 2023, 5, 797–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lynch, M.H.; Ievlev, E.; Good, M.R.R. Accelerated electron thermometer: Observation of 1D Planck radiation. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2023, 023D01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sorge, F. Gravitational memory of Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 104003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Butera, S.; Carusotto, I. Numerical studies of back reaction effects in an analog model of cosmological preheating. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 241501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Leonhardt, U. Cosmological horizons radiate. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2021, 135, 10002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Leonhardt, U. Wave correlations and quantum noise in cosmology. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2023, 56, 024001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Landau, Z.; Leonhardt, U. Quantum noise in time-dependent media and cosmic expansion. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110, 224202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hsiang, J.-T.; Hu, B.-L. Fluctuation-dissipation relation for a quantum Brownian oscillator in a parametrically squeezed thermal field. Ann. Phys. 2021, 433, 168594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hsiang, J.-T.; Hu, B.-L. Foundational issues in dynamical Casimir effect and analogue features in cosmological particle creation. Universe 2024, 10, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Bukhari, S.M.A.S.; Wang, L.-G. Atom-field dynamics in curved spacetime. Front. Phys. 2024, 19, 54203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mandal, A.; Vega, S.M.; Huo, P. Polarized Fock states and the dynamical Casimir effect in molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 9215–9223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Moddel, G.; Weerakkody, A.; Doroski, D.; Bartusiak, D. Casimir-cavity-induced conductance changes. Phys. Rev. Res. 2021, 3, L022007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tian, Z.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L.; Jing, J.; Jiangfeng Du, J. Probing Lorentz-invariance-violation-induced nonthermal Unruh effect in quasi-two-dimensional dipolar condensates. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, L061701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Oelschläger, M.; Reiche, D.; Egerland, C.H.; Busch, K.; Intravaia, F. Electromagnetic viscosity in complex structured environments: From blackbody to quantum friction. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 052205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Triana, J.F.; Herrera, F. Ultrafast modulation of vibrational polaritons for controlling the quantum field statistics at mid-infrared frequencies. New J. Phys. 2022, 24, 023008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liberal, I.; Vázquez-Lozano, J.E.; Victor Pacheco-Peña, V. Quantum antireflection temporal coatings: Quantum state frequency shifting and inhibited thermal noise amplification. Laser Photon. Rev. 2023, 2200720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Brey, L.; Fertig, H.A. Quantum plasmons in double layer systems. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, 045303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Todorov, Y.; Dhillon, S.; Mangeney, J. THz quantum gap: Exploring potential approaches for generating and detecting non-classical states of THz light. Nanophotonics 2024, 13, 1681–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Taya, H. Mutual assistance between the Schwinger mechanism and the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 023346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Schwinger, J. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. 1951, 82, 664–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Mendonça, J.T. Particle-pair creation by high-harmonic laser fields. Phys. Scr. 2023, 98, 125606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Matos, G.C.; de Melo e Souza, R.; Maia Neto, P.A.; Impens, F. Quantum vacuum Sagnac effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 270401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D.; Villar, P.I. Quantum Otto cycle in a superconducting cavity in the nonadiabatic regime. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 022202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ferreri, A.; Macrì, V.; Wilhelm, F.K.; Nori, F.; Bruschi, D.E. Quantum field heat engine powered by phonon-photon interactions. Phys. Rev. Res. 2023, 5, 043274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D.; Villar, P.I. Shortcut to adiabaticity in a cavity with a moving mirror. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 052217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D.; Villar, P.I. Fast adiabatic control of an optomechanical cavity. Entropy 2023, 25, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D.; Villar, P.I. Adiabatic shortcuts completion in quantum field theory: Annihilation of created particles. Entropy 2023, 25, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ancheyta, R.R. Vacuum radiation versus shortcuts to adiabaticity. Phys. Rev. A 2023, 108, 022217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ghenimi, S.E.; Sengouga, A. Boundary stabilization of a vibrating string with variable length. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2024, 532, 127910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Bai, J.; Chai, S. Exact controllability for a one-dimensional degenerate wave equation in domains with moving boundary. Appl. Math. Lett. 2021, 119, 107235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Dittrich, J.; Rakhmanov, S.; Matrasulov, D. Dirac particle under dynamical confinement: Fermi acceleration, trembling motion and quantum force. Phys. Lett. A 2024, 503, 129408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Rakhmanov, S.; Trunk, C.; Znojil, M.; Matrasulov, D. PT-symmetric dynamical confinement: Fermi acceleration, quantum force and Berry phase. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 109, 053519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Rakhmanov, S.; Trunk, C.; Matrasulov, D. Quantum particle under dynamical confinement: From quantum fermi acceleration to high harmonic generation. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 075308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Akopyan, L.A.; Trunin, D.A. Dynamical Casimir effect in nonlinear vibrating cavities. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 065005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Trunin, D.A. Particle creation in nonstationary large N quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 045001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Trunin, D.A. Nonlinear dynamical Casimir effect at weak nonstationarity. Eur. Phys. J. C 2022, 82, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Dodonov, A.V.; Dodonov, V.V. Dynamical Casimir effect via modulated Kerr or higher-order nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 013709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Trunin, D.A. Enhancement of particle creation in nonlinear resonant cavities. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 065004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Khusnutdinov, N.; Emelianova, N. The normal Casimir force for lateral moving planes with isotropic conductivities. Physics 2024, 6, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Antezza, M.; Emelianova, N.; Khusnutdinov, N. The normal Casimir–Lifshitz force for laterally moving graphene. Nanotechnology 2024, 35, 235001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Farías, M.B.; Fosco, C.D.; Lombardo, F.C.; Mazzitelli, F.D. Motion induced radiation and quantum friction for a moving atom. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 036013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Dedkov, G.V.; Kyasov, A.A. Nonlocal friction forces in the particle-plate and plate-plate configurations: Nonretarded approximation. Surf. Sci. 2020, 700, 121681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Wang, Y.; Jia, Y. Quantum dissipation and friction attributed to plasmons. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 36, 2150589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Brevik, I.; Shapiro, B.; Silveirinha, M.G. Fluctuational electrodynamics in and out of equilibrium. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2022, 37, 22410123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Reiche, D.; Intravaia, F.; Busch, K. Wading through the void: Exploring quantum friction and nonequilibrium fluctuations. APL Photon. 2022, 7, 030902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Wu, K.; Schmidt, T.L.; Farias, M.B. Quantum friction between metals in the hydrodynamic regime. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 012811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Dedkov, G.V. Casimir–Lifshitz friction force and kinetics of radiative heat transfer between metal plates in relative motion. JETP Lett. 2023, 117, 952–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Dedkov, G.V. Casimir–Lifshitz frictional heating in a system of parallel metallic plates. Physics 2024, 6, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fernández, A.; Fosco, C.D. Quantum friction for a scalar model: Spatial dependence and higher orders. Ann. Phys. 2024, 463, 169635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Oue, D.; Pendry, J.B.; Silveirinha, M.G. Stable-to-unstable transition in quantum friction. Phys. Rev. Res. 2024, 6, 043074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Farías, M.B.; Lombardo, F.C.; Soba, A.; Villar, P.I.; Decca, R.S. Towards detecting traces of non-contact quantum friction in the corrections of the accumulated geometric phase. npj Quantum Inf. 2020, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Lobanov, I.S.; Nikiforov, D.S.; Popov, I.Y.; Trifanov, A.I.; Trifanova, E.S. Model of time-dependent geometric graph for dynamical Casimir effect. Ind. J. Phys. 2021, 95, 2115–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Cius, D.; Andrade, F.M.; de Castro, A.S.M.; Moussa, M.H.Y. Enhancement of photon creation through the pseudo-Hermitian dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2022, 593, 126945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Al-Ghamdi, M.S.; Berrada, K.; Abdel-Khalek, S.; Eleuch, H. Effect of relativistic motion on superconducting quantum bits under decoherence. Results Phys. 2022, 38, 105402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Dolgirev, P.E.; Zong, A.; Michael, M.H.; Curtis, J.B.; Podolsky, D.; Cavalleri, A.; Demler, E. Periodic dynamics in superconductors induced by an impulsive optical quench. Commun. Phys. 2022, 5, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Li, N.; Lin, Z.-J.; Wei, M.-S.; Liao, M.-J.; Xu, J.-P.; Ke, S.-H.; Ya-Ping Yang, Y.-P. Preparation of squeezed light with low average photon number based on dynamic Casimir effect. Chin. Phys. B 2023, 32, 120301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Long, Y.M.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, T.Y. Decoherence of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering and the teleportation fidelity in the dynamical Casimir effect. Quant. Inform. Proces. 2020, 19, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Viotti, L.; Lombardo, F.C.; Villar, P.I. Enhanced decoherence for a neutral particle sliding on a metallic surface in vacuum. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 032809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Long, Y.M.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, T.Y. Entanglement and Gaussian interference power in the dynamical Casimir effect. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2020, 59, 3574–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Villar, P.I. Entanglement degradation of cavity modes due to the dynamical Casimir effect. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 125008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Velasco, C.I.; Del Grosso, N.F.; Lombardo, F.C.; Soba, A.; Villar, P.I. Photon generation and entanglement in a double superconducting cavity. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 106, 043701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Zhao, S.; Long, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, T.; Zhang, X. Genuine tripartite entanglement in the dynamical Casimir coupled waveguides. Quant. Inform. Proces. 2021, 20, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Agasti, S.; Djorwé, P. Bistability-assisted mechanical squeezing and entanglement. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 095129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Medina-Armendariz, M.A.; Quezada, L.F.; Sun, G.-H.; Dong, S.-H. Exploring entanglement dynamics in an optomechanical cavity with a type-V qutrit and quantized two-mode field. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Apppl. 2024, 635, 129514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Mercurio, A.; Russo, E.; Mauceri, F.; Savasta, S.; Nori, F.; Macrì, V.; Lo Franco, R. Bilateral photon emission from a vibrating mirror and multiphoton entanglement generation. SciPost Phys. 2025, 18, 067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Nakata, K.; Suzuki, K. Magnonic Casimir effect in ferrimagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 096702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Esteso, V.; Frustaglia, D.; Carretero-Palacios, S.; Míguez, H. Casimir–Lifshitz optical resonators: A new platform for exploring physics at the nanoscale. Adv. Phys. Res. 2024, 3, 2300065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Hau, L.V.; Harris, S.E.; Dutton, Z.; Behroozi, C.H. Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas. Nature 1999, 397, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Andreata, M.A.; Dodonov, V.V. Energy density and packet formation in a vibrating cavity. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 2000, 33, 3209–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Leonhardt, U.; Piwnicki, P. Relativistic effects of light in moving media with extremely low group velocity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Wegkamp, D.; Stähler, J. Ultrafast dynamics during the photoinduced phase transition in VO2. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2015, 90, 464–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Mogunov, I.A.; Fernández, F.; Lysenko, S.; Kent, A.J.; Scherbakov, A.V.; Kalashnikova, A.M.; Akimov, A.V. Ultrafast insulator-metal transition in VO2 nanostructures assisted by picosecond strain pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 014054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Dodonov, V.V. Is it possible to simulate the Dynamical Casimir Effect in a cavity? A simplified classical model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2025, 40, 2543009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Dodonov, V.V.; Klimov, A.B. Generation and detection of photons in a cavity with a resonantly oscillating boundary. Phys. Rev. A 1996, 53, 2664–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Dodonov, V.V. Resonance photon generation in a vibrating cavity. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1998, 31, 9835–9854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dodonov, V.V. Dynamical Casimir Effect: 55 Years Later. Physics 2025, 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics7020010

AMA Style

Dodonov VV. Dynamical Casimir Effect: 55 Years Later. Physics. 2025; 7(2):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics7020010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dodonov, Viktor V. 2025. "Dynamical Casimir Effect: 55 Years Later" Physics 7, no. 2: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics7020010

APA Style

Dodonov, V. V. (2025). Dynamical Casimir Effect: 55 Years Later. Physics, 7(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/physics7020010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop