Recovery of Stainless Steel from End-of-Use Dishwashers †
by
Eirini Evangelou
1,*, 
Georgios N. Anastassakis
1,
Spyridon-Dionysios Karamoutsos
2 and
Athanasios Stergiou
2 1
School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou Str., 15780 Athens, Greece
2
Ecoreset S.A., Thesi Prari Moustaki, 19300 Aspropyrgos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Raw Materials and Circular Economy “RawMat2023”, Athens, Greece, 28 August–2 September 2023.
Mater. Proc. 2023, 15(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015057
Published: 14 December 2023
Abstract
:Wastes of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) include a variety of products, from house appliances to spacecraft equipment, turning them into a significant source of secondary raw materials. Stainless steel is one of the most useful and valuable products of WEEE. Large quantities of stainless steel can be recovered from dishwashers. In this research project, the preparation of the samples includes the separation of their components, according to the following successive procedure: the dishwashers are processed through a magnetic separator to hold the magnetic ferrous pieces, an eddy current separator to separate the non-ferrous metals and an induction sorting sensor to detect and separate the remaining metallic fractions. From this procedure, two outgoing streams are produced: the stainless steel stream with some impurities and the impurity stream. Thereinafter, the stainless steel stream passes through a high intensity magnetic separator in order to eliminate the contained impurities. The result of this high-intensity magnetic separation is a magnetic stream containing the stainless steel pieces and a non-magnetic stream which contains the impurities. The final step of this procedure is hand sorting, so that any remaining impurities in the magnetic stream are removed.
1. Introduction
Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) is generally classified under hazardous waste [1]. The determination of process methods and the quantities of WEEE to be processed are of significant importance since this enables the efficient operation and management of recycling systems. Recycling is the process of retrieving the material content of used and nonfunctioning products through a series of operations, including sorting, disassembly and bulk recycling [1].
The recycling of WEE is important not only to reduce the amount of waste requiring treatment, but also to promote the recovery of valuable materials as well as the elimination of its intrinsic hazardous and deleterious components and compounds [2].
WEEE may consist of more than 1000 different substances of various shapes and sizes [3]. Due to hazardous materials contained in WEEE, such as lead, mercury and cadmium, it is absolutely necessary to recover WEEE in order to avoid environmental contamination [4]. Moreover, since WEEE contains considerable amounts of valuable materials, such as gold, palladium and copper, the recovery of WEEE offers a potential economic gain [5]. Today, there are various recovery options for WEEE, including reuse, repair, recycling, remanufacturing and disposal.
WEEE contains recyclable materials with high added value [6], such as ferrous and non-ferrous metals, plastics, electronic components and others (Table 1). Efforts are made in order to increase the recovery rate and the purity of the recoverable stainless stream. Consequently, the recycling and reuse of stainless steel play an important role in primary raw materials saving, environmental protection and in decreasing the production cost.
This research project targets a specific WEEE product—the dishwasher—because, regardless of the brand, they have largely the same types and number of parts. The difference lies in how these parts are assembled. The main material fractions of dishwashers are stainless steel, steel, copper and other materials. It is really important to recover stainless steel concentrates of high purity, as copper contamination is accepted only at a low percentage (less than 0.25%) [7].
2. Experimental Procedure
The separation of dishwasher components consists of definite steps [8]. Size reduction, the manual removal of large components, such as external cables, magnetic separation, eddy current separation and induction-sensor sorting compose the flowsheet of the procedure. Two outcome streams are created: the stainless steel stream with some impurities and the impurity stream. Impurities that are present in the stainless steel stream contain plastics, copper cables, paper, printed circuit boards (PCBs) and other materials. Despite their low conductivity, all these materials are detected by the sensor and sorted along with stainless steel pieces (Chart 1).
In a second stage, the modification of the parameters of the induction sorter result in the separation of copper cables, which exhibit lower conductivity due to their size and morphology, from the stainless steel pieces. This procedure takes place in Ecoreset S.A. plant, at Aspropyrgos, Greece.
When the previous procedure had been completed, the final step occurred at Mineral Processing Laboratory, NTUA. The stainless steel stream goes through a high-intensity magnetic separator (Photo 1), resulting in two products: the magnetic product, consisting of stainless steel pieces and any impurities, and the non-magnetic stream consisting of any other materials. It is pointed out that, as the tilt of the blade increases, the opening of the magnetic receptor decreases. As a result, the larger stainless steel pieces are concentrated in the non-magnetic receptor as the tilt of the blade increases.
Five different samples (models/producers) were used for this study. Details concerning the manufacturing company and the specific model of each dishwasher are provided in Table 2. The efficient results obtained in all cases, and the variety of the models used in the experimental procedure, confirm the universality of the separation method, independent of the manufacturer and/or the dishwasher model.
The results concerning the percent weight of stainless steel in the magnetic stream and the recovery of stainless steel are presented in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7. Moreover, the tables provide information concerning the characterization of the non-magnetic product of each sample.
The stainless steel recovery, depicted in Table 7, is calculated as follows:
A: stainless steel in magnetic stream (%)
B: weight of magnetic stream (%)
C: stainless steel in non-magnetic stream (%)
D: weight of non-magnetic stream (%)
R: recovery (%)
From Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7, it is obvious that, as the tilt of the blade increases, the percent weight of stainless steel stream decreases. Furthermore, the magnetic stream is of high purity, independent of the tilt of the blade.
Image 1, Image 2 and Image 3 depict the dishwasher materials after their treatment in the Minera Processing Laboratory, NTUA.
- Industrial−Scale Experiments
A similar procedure to that previously described takes place in the plant of Ecoreset S.A (Chart 2). A pilot separation unit was established by Ecoreset S.A., including a neodymium magnet and an induction sorting sensor (Image 4 and Image 5). The high-intensity neodymium magnet holds the stainless steel pieces; subsequently, an induction sorting sensor is used to separate all cables from plastic, including copper cables. Materials such as plastics or paper are rejected and concentrated in a different stream. The results are described in Table 8 and Table 9. The recovery of stainless steel (Table 9) is calculated according to the methodology previously described.
Chart 2.
Flowchart of the components’ separation line on an industrial scale.
Image 3.
The non-magnetic product of Sample 3, with the blade tilt set at 50°—the left basket contains the stainless steel pieces that could not be held and were rejected as the non-magnetic product, while the right basket contains the non-magnetic product.
Image 3.
The non-magnetic product of Sample 3, with the blade tilt set at 50°—the left basket contains the stainless steel pieces that could not be held and were rejected as the non-magnetic product, while the right basket contains the non-magnetic product.
Image 4.
The back view of the neodymium magnet.
Image 5.
The right view of the neodymium magnet.
Table 8.
Weight of magnetic and non-magnetic products on industrial scale.
| Samples | % Weight of Magnetic Product | % Weight of Non-Magnetic Product |
|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 54.4 | 45.6 |
| Sample 2 | 76.6 | 23.4 |
| Sample 3 | 57.6 | 42.4 |
| Sample 4 | 64.2 | 35.8 |
| Sample 5 | 63.5 | 36.5 |
Table 9.
Grade and stainless steel recovery of magnetic separation products on industrial scale.
| Samples | Magnetic Stream | Non-Magnetic Stream | % Recovery of Stainless Steel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Stainless Steel | % Others | % Stainless Steel | % Others | ||
| Sample 1 | 98.4 | 1.6 | 10.8 | 89.2 | 91.6 |
| Sample 2 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 12.6 | 87.4 | 96.3 |
| Sample 3 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 15.5 | 84.5 | 89.8 |
| Sample 4 | 99.1 | 0.9 | 20.2 | 79.8 | 89.8 |
| Sample 5 | 98.6 | 1.4 | 27.1 | 72.9 | 86.4 |
The results of Table 9 clearly show that the magnetic product is pure or almost pure stainless steel as its grade ranges between 98.4 and 100% in all cases; correspondingly, the stainless steel recovery in the magnetic product is very high, exceeding 90% in all cases except that of Sample 5, which is slightly lower.
- SEM analysis
After the completion of the separation and the characterization of the dishwashers’ components, efforts were made to specify the composing elements of each sample (Table 10). Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used for element identification.
According to Table 10, the main components of the stainless steel of the dishwashers examined are as follows. The major component is Fe (as γ-Fe),with a content between 70 and 72% in all cases; the second most abundant element is Chromium (Cr), with content ranging between 17.7 and 20%; third in abundance is nickel (Ni) whose content varies between approximately 7 and 8.5%, followed by Manganese (Mn) with a much lower content (0.3 to 2.1% approx.). Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 provide more detailed information about the samples’ composition.
3. Results
Based on the results of lab-scale tests (Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7), the separation of stainless steel from dish washers is considered successful and very promising for application on an industrial scale. More specifically, the results of lab-scale tests (Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6) indicate that stainless steel pieces can be efficiently separated from other components by magnetic separation, as the grade of the magnetic product in stainless steel ranges, in all cases, from 85.1% to 98.7%; although there is not a clear dependence of the stainless steel content on the tilt, it seems that the magnetic products are purer for blade-tilts up to 50°. Therefore, the tilt plays a critical role in stainless steel recovery (Table 7), as it appears extremely low, while the tilt of the blade is increased. An increase in the tilt denotes that the opening of the magnetic products bin decreases, leading to a significantly lower recovery of stainless steel. On the other hand, the reduced bin-opening results in a higher purity product, as plastic pieces or any other contaminants cannot pass through it and, eventually, they are rejected. Concluding with lab-scale tests, optimum results seem to be obtained for a blade-tilt set at 30ο, as, under this condition, a higher recovery is achieved, combined with minimum impurities in the magnetic product.
The results of the experiments conducted on an industrial scale (Table 8 and Table 9) confirmed those in the lab. From Table 8, it can be derived that the percent weight of the magnetic products ranges between approximately 54% and 77% for the five samples. Comparing the corresponding weight of each sample for lab- and industrial-scale tests, we can derive that they are close for a lab-scale tilt of a 30° blade-tilt. Regarding the purity of the magnetic products in stainless steel and the recovery, they both appear to be better on an industrial scale than that in a lab (Table 9).
The results arising from the SEM analysis of each sample demonstrate that all five samples are γ-Fe stainless steel, as Nickel (Ni) is detected in all samples (Table 10) with its content ranging between approximately 7 and 8.5%.
4. Discussion
The constantly growing use of electrical and electronic equipment results in huge amounts of WEEE. To properly treat these amounts, it is absolutely necessary for the producers and designers to choose the proper components for their products, which are reusable and recyclable. The direction of “it has been produced, so it can be recycled” should dominate in every production sector, from smartphones to household appliances and heavy industrial machines.
Moreover, the environmental impact should not be ignored. The production of stainless steel from primary raw materials is a highly energy-consuming process and, consequently, of a high cost, as is true for all pyro-metallurgical processes. CO2 emissions and high energy consumption for raw material treatment impose major difficulties on the metallurgical industry, as environmental legislations become more and more strict.
Laboratory experiments proved the successful magnetic separation of stainless steel pieces from dishwasher components; the magnetic products were characterized as high-purity stainless steel, with corresponding minimum contamination from other components. The results were highly dependent on the blade-tilt, as an increase in the tilt (smaller cross-section of magnetic-product bin) leads to diminished separation and stainless steel recovery. The results can be further improved by reducing the size of stainless steel pieces for magnetic separation. Size reduction is crucial, as it provides the opportunity for the more efficient separation and characterization of dishwashers components. The promising lab-scale results were absolutely confirmed by industrial-scale magnetic separation tests.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.E., G.N.A., S.-D.K. and A.S.; Writing—original draft preparation, E.E.; Writing—Review and editing, G.N.A., S.-D.K. and A.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by from the General Secretariat for Research and Innovation (GSRI) of Greece, under the bilateral research project Greece-China No. Τ7ΔΚΙ-00364.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data are presented in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The contribution of P. Tsakiridis from the Laboratory of Physical Metallurgy in the School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering—NTUA, is also acknowledged.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Polat, O.; Capraz, O.; Gungor, A. Modelling of WEEE recycling operation planning under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buekens, A.; Yang, J. Recycling of WEEE plastics: A review. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2014, 16, 415–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EU. Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Off. J. Eur. Union 2003, 37, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- EU. Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union 2003, 37, 24–38. [Google Scholar]
- Cesaro, A.; Marra, A.; Belgiorno, V.; Guida, M. Effectiveness of WEEE mechanical treatment: Separation yields and recovered material toxicity. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2656–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beddoes, J.; Parr, J.G. Introduction to Stainless Steels, 3rd ed.; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Johansson, J.G.; Bjorklund, A.E. Reducing Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Recycling: Case Study on Dishwashers. J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 14, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evangelou, E.; Anastassakis, G.N.; Karamoutsos, S.-D.; Stergiou, A. Components’ Characterization of End-of-Life Dishwashers. Mater. Proc. 2021, 5, 84. [Google Scholar]
Chart 1.
Flowchart of the dishwasher component separation of Ecoreset S.A.
Figure 1.
SEM analysis of Sample 1.
Figure 2.
SEM analysis of Sample 2.
Figure 3.
SEM analysis of Sample 3.
Figure 4.
SEM analysis of Sample 4.
Figure 5.
SEM analysis of Sample 5.
Image 1.
Production line of Ecoreset S.A.
Image 2.
Magnetic product from Sample 2 with the blade tilt set at 30°—the left basket contains the contamination of magnetic product and the right one contains the stainless steel pieces.
Image 2.
Magnetic product from Sample 2 with the blade tilt set at 30°—the left basket contains the contamination of magnetic product and the right one contains the stainless steel pieces.
Table 1.
Components’ concentration in WEEE [2].
Table 1.
Components’ concentration in WEEE [2].
| Equipment Category | Ferrous Metals (%) | Non-Ferrous Metals (%) | Glass (%) | Plastics (%) | Other (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large household appliances | 61 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 21 |
| Small household appliances | 19 | 1 | 0 | 48 | 32 |
| IT equipment | 43 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 20 |
| Telecom | 13 | 7 | 0 | 74 | 6 |
| TV, radio, etc. | 11 | 2 | 35 | 31 | 22 |
Table 2.
List of dishwasher models.
| Dishwasher | Manufacturing Company | Specific Model |
|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Neff | 5786T6002E |
| Sample 2 | TEKA LP | Unrecognizable |
| Sample 3 | Whirlpool | ADG301 |
| Sample 4 | Pitsos Powerjet | 5 |
| Sample 5 | Siemens | SE5P1P |
Table 3.
Weight of magnetic product of dishwasher samples according to the blade tilt.
| Tilt of Blade | 30° | 50° | 70° |
|---|---|---|---|
| % Weight of Magnetic Stream | |||
| Sample 1 | 59.7 | 34.3 | 19.0 |
| Sample 2 | 74.9 | 48.4 | 17.9 |
| Sample 3 | 66.8 | 50.3 | 27.8 |
| Sample 4 | 66.3 | 45.0 | 25.3 |
| Sample 5 | 55.7 | 62.6 | 12.2 |
Table 4.
Composition of magnetic and non-magnetic products of dishwasher samples with the blade-tilt set at 30°.
Table 4.
Composition of magnetic and non-magnetic products of dishwasher samples with the blade-tilt set at 30°.
| Magnetic | Non-Magnetic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless Steel (%) | Other (%) | Stainless Steel (%) | Other (%) | |
| Sample 1 | 96.4 | 3.6 | 41.3 | 58.7 |
| Sample 2 | 98.7 | 1.3 | 46.3 | 43.7 |
| Sample 3 | 98.4 | 1.6 | 27.5 | 72.5 |
| Sample 4 | 93.6 | 6.4 | 50.6 | 49.4 |
| Sample 5 | 91.9 | 8.1 | 77.5 | 22.5 |
Table 5.
Composition of magnetic and non-magnetic products of dishwasher samples with the blade-tilt set at 50°.
Table 5.
Composition of magnetic and non-magnetic products of dishwasher samples with the blade-tilt set at 50°.
| Magnetic | Non-Magnetic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless Steel (%) | Other (%) | Stainless Steel (%) | Other (%) | |
| Sample 1 | 96.6 | 3.4 | 56.8 | 41.2 |
| Sample 2 | 98.2 | 1.8 | 72.4 | 27.6 |
| Sample 3 | 97.3 | 2.7 | 51.2 | 48.8 |
| Sample 4 | 95.3 | 4.7 | 61.0 | 39.0 |
| Sample 5 | 97.0 | 3.0 | 66.4 | 33.6 |
Table 6.
Composition of magnetic and non-magnetic products of dishwasher samples with the blade-tilt set at 70°.
Table 6.
Composition of magnetic and non-magnetic products of dishwasher samples with the blade-tilt set at 70°.
| Magnetic | Non-Magnetic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless Steel (%) | Other (%) | Stainless Steel (%) | Other (%) | |
| Sample 1 | 88.3 | 11.7 | 75.3 | 24.7 |
| Sample 2 | 85.1 | 14.9 | 92.9 | 7.1 |
| Sample 3 | 98.3 | 1.7 | 69.2 | 30.8 |
| Sample 4 | 94.1 | 5.9 | 74.3 | 25.7 |
| Sample 5 | 95.3 | 4.7 | 86.2 | 13.8 |
Table 7.
Recovery of stainless steel of dishwasher samples as a function of the blade tilt.
| Samples | % Recovery | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 30° | 50° | 70° | |
| Sample 1 | 77.6 | 47.3 | 21.6 |
| Sample 2 | 86.5 | 56.4 | 16.7 |
| Sample 3 | 87.9 | 65.8 | 36.3 |
| Sample 4 | 78.8 | 56.3 | 30.1 |
| Sample 5 | 60.1 | 71.0 | 14.3 |
Table 10.
Chemical analysis of dishwashers.
| Element | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Weight | |||||
| Si | 0.61 | 0.45 | 1.13 | 0.68 | 1.30 |
| Cr | 17.72 | 19.98 | 19.07 | 18.53 | 19.28 |
| Mn | 2.07 | 1.05 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 1.44 |
| Fe | 71.68 | 70.55 | 71.72 | 72.02 | 69.74 |
| Ni | 7.75 | 7.64 | 7.28 | 8.23 | 8.52 |
| Mo | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Al | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Evangelou, E.; Anastassakis, G.N.; Karamoutsos, S.-D.; Stergiou, A. Recovery of Stainless Steel from End-of-Use Dishwashers. Mater. Proc. 2023, 15, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015057
AMA Style
Evangelou E, Anastassakis GN, Karamoutsos S-D, Stergiou A. Recovery of Stainless Steel from End-of-Use Dishwashers. Materials Proceedings. 2023; 15(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015057
Chicago/Turabian StyleEvangelou, Eirini, Georgios N. Anastassakis, Spyridon-Dionysios Karamoutsos, and Athanasios Stergiou. 2023. "Recovery of Stainless Steel from End-of-Use Dishwashers" Materials Proceedings 15, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2023015057
