1. Introduction
During the combustion of solid fuels, emissions of various pollutants in the form of greenhouse gases affecting climate change and gases that have a direct negative impact on human health are generated [
1]. One of the main products of the combustion of solid fuels, especially carbon, is sulfur dioxide (SO
2) [
2]. Sulfur dioxide is a highly toxic gas [
3] with a suffocating odor. Sulfur dioxide undergoes a series of chemical transformations in the atmosphere: it oxidizes to sulfur trioxide, which, through its reaction with the water present in the air, forms sulfuric acid. The resulting sulfuric acid undergoes electrolytic dissociation upon contact with water droplets and decomposes into SO
42- and H
+ ions. These compounds have strong acidifying effects and have harmful effects on the environment, most often in the form of acid rain [
4].
In an automated boiler equipped with a retort burner and a solid fuel container, it is possible to burn both conventional fuel, such as crushed coal, and fuels from renewable energy sources in the form of biomass. Crushed coal is referred to as eco-pea coal [
5] (
Figure 1a), while compressed biomass in the form of wood is called pellet [
6] (
Figure 1b).
Retort burners in Poland are often chosen for single-family houses due to their versatility. A boiler with such a furnace is adapted to burning virtually any type of fragmented fuel [
7].
An essential part of the retort burner is its integrated screw feeder that supplies the fuel. The rotating element of the feeder causes the individual lumps of solid fuel to fall, due to gravity, from the feeder placed above the furnace and to gradually move towards the furnace.
The shifted fuel travels to the combustion chamber, where it is burned at the correct temperature. The retort burner is usually round or rectangular in shape, and in its upper part, there are special air supply channels. By means of the working air supply supported by the operation of the supply fans, the air flows through the holes in the burner, moving directly between the lumps of eco-pea coal or pellets. Due to the appropriate efficiency of the blown air, the combustion process can take place at the correct temperature, ensuring the burning of the vast majority of chemical compounds that may otherwise penetrate the resulting exhaust gases.
The advantage of retort burners is that they combust eco-pea coal or pellets only in the upper layer, which is located in the upper part of the burner. In this way, it is possible to obtain the appropriate temperature and burn off all the volatile substances generated. Another advantage of using retort burners is the fact that such a solution facilitates the disposal of ash. The ash is pushed out by the eco-pea coal or pellets supplied by the bottom of the working part of the burner and falls outside its circumference, falling directly into the chamber used for its collection.
In Poland, in automatic boilers with retort feeders, comminuted coal is burnt most frequently, the combustion of which emits significant amounts of sulfur dioxide. As an alternative to coal, in automatic boilers equipped with retort burners, biomass can be burned in the form of pellets, which emits much lower amounts of carbon dioxide compared to coal. The aim of this study is to compare the sulfur dioxide emissions as a result of combustion of fragmented coal and pellets in an automatic boiler equipped with a retort burner in a typical single-family house in Poland.
2. Materials and Methods
The analyzed automatic boiler with a feeder is located in a boiler room in a single-family, two-story building. The central heating installation operates within the assumed parameters of the supply and return temperatures of the boiler, equal to 65 °C and 55 °C, respectively, and works in connection with the convection heaters and underfloor heating in the building. The boiler also heats domestic hot water. The building is inhabited by one family, consisting of two adults and two children. The average daily consumption of domestic hot water recorded with a water meter over the period of three years was 22.5 dm
3/person/day. The average annual heat consumption required for heating the building and domestic hot water, measured over the three-year period, was 61.24 GJ/year. The heating power in the heating season was determined on the basis of the PN-EN-12831:2006 [
8] standard and amounted to 8.9 kW. During the three-year period, the boiler operated in the power range from 4 to 12 kW.
Figure 2 shows a diagram of the heating measurements during the operation of the automatic boiler with a retort burner in the analyzed single-family house.
The average annual efficiency of the heat production and transport heating system was calculated using the following formula:
where
Q is the annual energy required for heating the building during the heating season and domestic hot water [GJ],
B is the fuel consumption expressed in megagrams [Mg], and
w is the calorific value expressed in kilojoules per kilogram of fuel [kJ/kg].
The average annual efficiency of the heat generating and transmitting system was 0.56.
3. Results and Discussion
The average annual sulfur dioxide emissions of the operating automatic boiler used for heating the building and producing domestic hot water was determined according to the following formula:
where
Q is the annual energy required for heating the building during the heating season and the domestic hot water,
B is the fuel consumption expressed in megagrams [Mg], and
w is the calorific value expressed in kilojoules per kilogram of fuel [kJ/kg], while
EfSO2 is the sulfur dioxide emission factor for automatic boilers in [g/GJ].
In the case of the eco-pea coal, the amount of fuel burned during the year was measured, while the mass of the pellets burned during the year was determined on the basis of the efficiency of the heat generation and heat transport
η, the calorific value of the pellets
w, and the measured annual average energy required for heating the building and heating the domestic hot water
Q:
In order to heat the building and domestic hot water, the forecast average annual weight of the pellets burned in the retort boiler was about 21% higher compared to that of eco-pea coal, which is due to the lower calorific value of the pellets in relation to the eco-pea coal (
Table 1). On average, the annual emissions of carbon dioxide during the combustion of pellets were about 27 times higher compared to the eco-cork, which was a result of the significant sulfur content in the coal.
In order to heat the building and domestic hot water, the forecast average annual weight of the pellets burned in the retort boiler was about 21% higher compared to that of the eco-pea coal, which is due to the lower calorific value of the pellets in relation to the eco-pea coal. On average, the annual emissions of carbon dioxide during the combustion of the pellets were about 27 times higher compared to the eco-coal, which was a result of the significant sulfur content in the coal.
4. Conclusions
When choosing the type of fuel to burn in automatic boilers with retort burners, it is worth paying attention to sulfur dioxide emissions that travel into the atmosphere. In Poland, fragmented coal and pellets are popular fuels in small households. In the case of the pellets used for the analyzed single-family house, the emissions of sulfur dioxide were 1.63 kg/year, while in the case of the eco-pea coal, the emissions of carbon dioxide were 44.61 kg/year. The emissions of sulfur dioxide were as much as 27 times lower in the case of the pellets compared to the eco-pea coal. It should be noted here that not only is the combustion of pellets more environmentally friendly, but pellets are also classified as renewable energy sources.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.J.T., A.A. and T.J.T. proposed the research methodology and aims and organized the draft of the manuscript; T.J.T. performed the experiments; and A.A. and T.J.T. analyzed the results, wrote the manuscript, and agreed to its submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by WZ/WB-IIS/7/2022, scientific research at the Bialystok University of Technology.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data available within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Smołka-Danielowska, D.; Jabłońska, M.; Godziek, S. The Influence of Hard Coal Combustion in Individual Household Furnaces on the Atmosphere Quality in Pszczyna (Poland). Minerals 2021, 11, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Available online: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/sulfur-dioxide-so2 (accessed on 30 March 2022).
- Orellano, P.; Reynoso, J.; Quaranta, N. Short-term exposure to sulphur dioxide (SO2) and all-cause and respiratory mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2021, 150, 106434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, H.T.T.; Nguyen, A.T.; Do, A.T.N.; Hens, L. Impacts of Simulated Acid Rain on the Growth and the Yield of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in the Mountains of Northern Vietnam. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciupek, B.; Judt, W.; Gołoś, K.; Urbaniak, R. Analysis of Low-Power Boilers Work on Real Heat Loads: A Case of Poland. Energies 2021, 14, 3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knutel, B.; Gaze, B.; Wojtko, P.; Dębowski, M.; Bukowski, P. Multifaceted Analysis of the Use of Catalytic Additives for Combustion with Hemp Pellets in a Low-Power Boiler. Energies 2022, 15, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holubčík, M.; Kantová, N.; Trnka, J.; Jandačka, J. Operation of the Automatic Heat Source of on Pellets with Various Burner Types. Acta Tecnología 2019, 5, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PN-EN 12831-1:2017-08 Standard; Charakterystyka Energetyczna Budynków—Metoda Obliczania Projektowego Obciążenia cieplnego—Część 3: Obciążenie Domowych Instalacji Ciepłej Wody Użytkowej i Charakterystyka Zapotrzebowania, Moduł M8-2, M8-3. European Standard: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).