1. Introduction
Stem volume equations with high accuracy are essential for forest industry and management to ensure future supply for industrial purposes such as carbon sequestration [
1,
2]. Usually, volume equations are developed to estimate wood or biomass by considering the diameter of the tree and the total or commercial height [
3]. One of the key aspects that genetic improvement programs consider to be a valuable individual tree trait is a cylindrical shape for the robustness of volume estimates [
4].
In the case of Eucalyptus plantations, having low-bias equations is key for productive planning and for the development of management measures to optimize production [
5]; aspects such as water availability and/or genotype are key considerations of generalized or specific models. Research has generally focused on improving productivity in specific sites, and volume modeling is specified, which limits the development of models that consider environmental conditions that infer the volume of the stem over time. For example, Assis et al. [
6] generalized that volumetric models can be developed for clones or taxa, in which the effects of water availability to which individuals are exposed to is considered. Therefore, the objective of the present research was to evaluate the effects of water availability and genotype and the interaction with water irrigation x genotype in
Eucalyptus volume equations.
2. Materials and Methods
The plantation was located in Yumbel, Bio-Bio, Chile (37°8′0.01″ S, 72°27′34.70″ W); the weather presents an average temperature of 13.8 °C, and precipitation amounts to 1252 mm/yr; the soil was classified as dystric xeropsamments [
7]. The site was planted in 2013 with a 2 × 3 m spacing and a split-plot design with three replicates, as the major factor was water availability (high- and low-irrigation); the minor factor was genotype (
Eucalyptus globulus (high-yield, EgH; low-yield, EgL),
E. nitens x globulus (high-yield, EngH; low-yield, EngL),
E. camedulensis x globulus (Ecg),
E. badjensis (Eb),
E. nitens (En), and
E. smithii (Es)).
Per the genotype treatments of the water regime x, five individual trees were selected, and the DBH (diameter at 1.3 m above-ground) was measured before harvesting; then, the total height (H) was measured (diameter > 2 cm) and the entire stem was weighed, while three samples were taken to estimate the moisture content and to determine the dry biomass according to the methodology proposed by Valverde et al. [
8]. Subsequently, three volume equations were fitted: Schumacher and Hall [
9] (Equation (1)), Honer [
10] (Equation (2)), and Clutter et al. [
11] (Equation (3)). To evaluate the effects of the water regime and the genotype of the factor, dummy variables were used according to the method proposed by Quiorez-Barraza et al. [
12]. Finally, the best equations were selected based on the adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj-R
2), RMSE, AIC, and BIC. All analyses were performed in R with a significance level of 0.05.
3. Results and Discussion
The genotypes did not show significant differences between water availability conditions; therefore, two dasometric groups were obtained: (i) Es, Ecg, and Ecg were considered to be small in size, with a DBH < 14.8 cm, H < 14.2 m, and an average total volume of 0.187 m3 tree−1; (ii) Eb, En, EngH, EgH, and EngL were determined to be bigger in size, with DBH > 16.2 cm, H > 16.4 m, and average total volume of 0.113 m3 tree−1.
The analyses indicated that there is no significant effect of the genotype on the variables, irrigation regime, and interaction of the genotype × irrigation regime in the tree volume equations analyzed (
Table 1). When determining the equation of best fit (
Table 2), Schumacher and Hall showed the best statistical indicators (highest Adj-R
2 and lower RMSE, MAD, AIC, and BIC), followed by the Honer equation, which differed by showing higher statistical criteria, especially for RMSE. On the contrary, Clutter et al. presented the worst indicators and the worst volume estimation equation. Therefore, the best generalized volume equation (Equation (4)) can be used for any genotype × water regime in the study region; however, the equation tends to underestimate the volume between 3 and 8% in individuals with a DBH > 25 cm.
Scolforo et al. [
13] and Gomat et al. [
14] highlighted that the irrigation regimen can directly infer the growth of the tree, but they did not show evidence that it affects the shape of the stem. An aspect that Binkey et al. [
15] showed was that variations in temperature and rainfall directly affect water use and productivity but not the stem profile in Eucalyptus genotypes. In the case of genotype, when clonal material is selected according to the productivity and characteristics desired for the industry, the variability in the bole in the shape of the stem is reduced since it is desired to have the most homogeneous stems possible that have a tendency towards a cylindrical shape. This is due to the optimization of the use of bole [
16]. Therefore, the contribution of this variable is not significant in practice and can be omitted from the equations [
13].
4. Conclusions
The effects of the irrigation regimen, genotype, and their interaction were not found in any of the volume equations used. In this way, it is possible to use general equations that consider all of the conditions for the study. Therefore, this implies optimization in the management and modeling of Eucalyptus plantations.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.C.V., R.R., D.B., and Y.E.; methodology, J.C.V., Y.E., and D.B.; software, J.C.V. and R.R.; resources, R.R., A.M., O.M. and V.E.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.V. and R.R.; writing—review and editing, J.C.V., R.R., and O.C.C.; funding acquisition, R.R., A.M., and V.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the government of Chile via CONICYT Fondecyt Regular Project 1190835, CONICYT FONDEF Project IT16I10087, and ANID BASAL FB210015. Additional funding for the maintenance of these trials was provided by CMPC Forestal Mininco S.A. and the Forest Productivity Cooperative at Universidad de Concepción Chile as well as by support from the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) and the Scholarship Program, DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2020-21202023.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the many professionals from CMPC S.A. (Forestal Mininco) who provided invaluable support during the field installation, maintenance, and establishment of the irrigation system.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Souza, G.S.A.d.; Cosenza, D.N.; da Silva Cardoso Araújo, A.C.; Pimenta, L.U.A. Evaluation of non-linear taper equations for predicting the diameter of eucalyptus trees. Revista Árvore 2018, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cerqueira, C.L.; Môra, R.; Tonini, H.; Arce, J.E.; Carvalho, S.D.P.C.; Vendruscolo, D.G.S. Modeling of eucalyptus tree stem taper in mixed production systems. Sci. For. 2021, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nogueira, G.S.; Leite, H.G.; Reis, G.G.; Moreira, A.M. Influência do espaçamento inicial sobre a forma do fuste de árvores de Pinus taeda L. Revista Árvore 2008, 32, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, M.L.R.d.; Leite, H.G.; Garcia, S.L.R.; Campos, J.C.C.; Soares, C.P.B.; Santana, R.C. Estimação do volume de árvores de clones de eucalipto pelo método da similaridade de perfis. Revista Árvore 2009, 33, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osler, G.; West, P.; Downes, G. Effects of bending stress on taper and growth of stems of youngEucalyptus regnans trees. Trees 1996, 10, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assis, A.; Scolforo, J.R.; de Mello, J.M.; Júnior, F.W.A. Comparison between segmented and non-segmented polynomial models in the estimates of diameter and merchantable volume of Pinus taeda. Cerne 2001, 7, 20–40. [Google Scholar]
- CIREN. Estudio Agrológico VIII Región. Descripciones de Suelos, Materiales y Símbolos; Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales, Ed.; Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales: Santiago, Chile, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Valverde, J.C.; Rubilar, R.; Medina, A.; Mardones, O.; Emhart, V.; Bozo, D.; Espinoza, Y.; Campoe, O. Taper and individual tree volume equations of Eucalyptus varieties under contrasting irrigation regimes. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 2022, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schumacher, F.X. Logarithmic expression of timber-tree volume. J. Agric. Res. 1933, 47, 719–734. [Google Scholar]
- Honer, T. A new total cubic foot volume function. For. Chron. 1965, 41, 476–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clutter, J.L.; Fortson, J.C.; Pienaar, L.V.; Brister, G.H.; Bailey, R.L. Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Quiñonez-Barraza, G.; Dehai, Z.; De Los Santos-Posadas, H.M.; Santiago-García, W. Compatible taper, volume, green weight, biomass and carbon concentration system for Quercus sideroxyla Bonpl. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Cienc. For. Y Del Ambiente 2019, 25, 49–69. [Google Scholar]
- Scolforo, H.F.; McTague, J.P.; Burkhart, H.E.; Roise, J.; Carneiro, R.L.; Stape, J.L. Generalized stem taper and tree volume equations applied to eucalyptus of varying genetics in Brazil. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 49, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomat, H.Y.; Deleporte, P.; Moukini, R.; Mialounguila, G.; Ognouabi, N.; Saya, A.R.; Vigneron, P.; Saint-Andre, L. What factors influence the stem taper of Eucalyptus: Growth, environmental conditions, or genetics? Ann. For. Sci. 2011, 68, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Binkley, D.; Campoe, O.C.; Alvares, C.; Carneiro, R.L.; Cegatta, Í; Stape, J.L. The interactions of climate, spacing and genetics on clonal Eucalyptus plantations across Brazil and Uruguay. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 405, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laclau, J.-P.; Bouillet, J.-P.; Gonçalves, J.; Silva, E.; Jourdan, C.; Cunha, M.; Moreira, M.; Saint-André, L.; Maquère, V.; Nouvellon, Y.; et al. Mixed-species plantations of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis in Brazil: 1. Growth dynamics and aboveground net primary production. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255, 3905–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Statistical significance (p-value) of genotypes, irrigation, and their interaction on selected volume equations (ns, not significant).
Table 1.
Statistical significance (p-value) of genotypes, irrigation, and their interaction on selected volume equations (ns, not significant).
Equation | Variable Analyzed |
---|
Genotype | Irrigation | Genotype × Irrigation |
---|
Schumacher and Hall | 0.203 ns | 0.413 ns | 0.100 ns |
Honer | 0.382 ns | 0.402 ns | 0.334 ns |
Clutter et al. | 0.221 ns | 0.100 ns | 0.239 ns |
Table 2.
Statistical values for selecting generalized volume equations for Eucalyptus.
Table 2.
Statistical values for selecting generalized volume equations for Eucalyptus.
Equation | Adj-R2 | RMSE | AIC | BIC | Ranking |
---|
Schumacher and Hall | 0.98 | 0.02 | 132.78 | 138.90 | 1 |
Honer | 0.87 | 2.01 | 149.33 | 142.26 | 2 |
Clutter et al. | 0.73 | 3.11 | 150.47 | 168.17 | 3 |
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).