4.1. Vessel Motions in Heavy Weather
In order to better understand the effect of heavy weather conditions on underway vessels at this point, it is worth briefly introducing some basic information on vessel stability characteristics and the most dangerous vessel motions that can lead to damages to the cargo, the vessel itself, or the crew onboard. When a vessel floats in the sea, it is under the action of two major forces, gravity (G), a downward force that is equivalent to the weight of the body, acting at the center of gravity, and an upward vertical buoyancy force (B) which is equal to the weight of the water displaced by the immersed body (water plane) which passes through the center of the displaced volume of water (center of buoyancy). G and B lie on the same vertical center line (
Figure 1, left). If the vessel heels to some angle because of an external force such as wind or waves, then the water volume displaced is larger to one side (
Figure 1, right); thus, the center of buoyancy shifts to the right from B to B
1, while at the same time, G remains in its original position. The point at which the vertical line from the new buoyancy center (B
1) intersects the center line is called the metacenter of the vessel (M). The distance between the G and M is the metacentric height (GM) and is a key factor in vessel stability. Depending on the relative locations of G and M, the GM can be large or small, leading to a vessel with high or low stability, respectively. The term stability refers to a vessel’s ability to return (roll) to the upright position when heeled. A vessel with high GM is called stiff, and it has a relatively small rolling period (rolls quickly) which could cause damage to cargo/vessel and discomfort to the crew onboard. The rolling period is the time taken by the ship to roll from one side to the other and back again to the initial position. Vessels with small GM are known as tender. Tender vessels have a much larger rolling period; however, the angle of the maximum heel from which the vessel can return to the upright position is smaller (risk of capsizing). When M is below G, GM becomes negative, and the vessel is unstable, with a high risk of capsizing.
It is a common phenomenon for vessels to roll, resulting in a gentle motion. However, in heavy seas and under certain conditions, it can become uncomfortable and even dangerous for the vessel. The ship’s movement, speed, and wind/wave direction are all factors that potentially reinforce rolling to life-threatening angles of 25 degrees or more.
Parametric rolling and synchronous rolling are two types of rolling that can occur when a vessel is traveling in rough seas. The latter can happen when the rolling period of the vessel becomes synchronous/resonant with the wave encounter period (time between two successive waves), then the wave increases the amplitude of the roll, and the vessel is not able to return to an upright position. In extreme cases, when the wave direction is perpendicular to the vessel, synchronous rolling can result in the capsizing of the vessel.
On the other hand, parametric rolling refers to the conditions under which the vessel’s stability alternates as it rolls. When a vessel and waves have the same or opposite direction, the wave length is approximately similar to the length of the vessel, and the wave encounter period is close to one or half of the vessel’s rolling period, then the available water plane fluctuates. Depending on the position of the wave crest and trough relative to the vessel body, the displaced water is not fixed, affecting the buoyancy center and GM. This leads to a not fixed rolling period (the vessel’s stability alternates as it rolls).
Another phenomenon that can affect a vessel and its cargo is when waves are big enough to flow masses of water over the ship’s deck (green water). Vessels whose vertical distance between the deck and waterline is relatively small or vessels that roll are more susceptible to green water. The violent force of the water on deck can lead to vessel damage, and in heavy seas, water can infiltrate cargo holds, damaging dry cargo.
Based on vessel reports for the last 4 years (2018–2022) regarding vessel damage cases due to the above ship motions, more than half (53%) of them were associated with low-pressure systems or fronts. Additionally, 12% of the damage cases were caused by tropical storms, 17% were due to seasonal monsoons, and 18% were due to mixed or other weather conditions.
4.2. Vessel Weather Routing—Heavy Weather Avoidance
Vessel weather routing is a service for marine customers to optimize ship navigation with the most efficient and safe voyage routes for a given voyage. This is achieved by analyzing weather/wave forecasts, patterns, and conditions considering vessel characteristics (stability, etc.) and cargo type. Optimum ship routing not only helps vessels avoid stormy weather but also helps vessels arrive on time at the destination as required by clients and promotes the optimum and least fuel consumption. In fact, this service contributed to the reduction of 2.8 million mt of CO2 in twelve months (between June 2018 and May 2019).
Before a vessel departs from the port, the initial voyage plan (IVP) procedure starts. The vessel receives the IVP instructions, including a list of the suggested waypoints for the vessel and a detailed description of the weather for the next several days. For relatively short voyages, the weather forecast is a key factor for any decision making; however, as the voyage becomes longer (e.g., transatlantic/transpacific), the seasonal climatological conditions of the area are seriously considered. The IVP is sent to the vessel sufficient time before the estimated time of departure. Once a vessel has departed, the monitoring and the underway service procedure begins. The vessels normally receive new, updated voyage instructions every three days unless the vessel is in heavy weather or there is a special request from the Master (Captain) or the vessel operator for closer monitoring and guidance.
4.2.1. Initial Voyage Planning
In
Figure 2a, there is an example of a westbound vessel sailing from New Orleans (USA) to Qinhuangdao (China) during the winter of 2022. In this case, the Master’s sailing intentions were to cross the Pacific Ocean in a great circle, which is the shortest possible route option from point A to point B on a sphere. Even though, in theory, that route seemed the shortest and the most economical, in practice, it would not be the case due to the seasonal weather conditions. The key feature of the wintertime weather pattern in the North Pacific is the Arctic high pressure which slowly builds over the Bering Strait and pushes the main low track southward into the mid-latitudes. Given the fact that the main cyclogenesis area in the Pacific is located east of Japan, the main low track has a northeast direction, with lows generally tracking into the Aleutians Islands or, most likely, to Alaska Bay, producing an extensive area of dangerous conditions north of 40° N. Because of all the above, a more conservative route along 31° N was suggested by WNI and accepted by the vessel’s Master. Based on post-processed model data verified against real observations, as was explained in the WNI Model section, the conditions the vessel encountered following the southern route against the conditions it would have encountered if the vessel followed the Master’s initial intentions (
Figure 2b) were compared. The WNI’s route aimed at positioning the vessel further south of the main low track, minimizing its exposure to successive low-pressure systems associated with strong gale force winds (BF 8–9) and up to dangerous 12 m seas/swells combined. On the contrary, the vessel actually sailed under moderate to strong breezes with 2–4 m seas/swells resulting in earlier arrival by 23 h and less fuel consumption by 49 mt compared to the Master’s initial intentions.
4.2.2. Underway Vessel Monitoring
In
Figure 3a, there is an example of a westbound vessel sailing from China to the Mediterranean Sea during the summer of 2022. Approaching Sri Lanka, the weather forecast indicated that the vessel would be significantly affected by the summer monsoon in the Arabian Sea. During the summer months in the Northern Hemisphere, there is an increase in the temperature differences over the landmass of the Indian Plateau against the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal due to the different heat capacities. Since surface interaction of the air mass over the land is prevented by the Himalayan mountain range, a temperature gradient forms across the region, and onshore southwesterly winds begin to blow across the North Indian Ocean. The roughest conditions, including near gale winds and 6m waves, are found north of 10° N, between 56° E and 63° E. As the waves propagate from the coast of Somalia to the coast of India and Pakistan, the waves transition from wind waves to swell around 60° E, causing the wave periods to increase as they travel northeastward. Because the vessel had sensitive cargo (heavy machinery on deck) and there was a high risk of rolling, a south diversion along 8° N was suggested to minimize exposure to heavier conditions. After close and constant communication with the Master, the vessel sailed further southwest of Socotra Island while avoiding prolonged periods of near gale to gale force winds (BF 7–8) and over 6m seas/swells for more than 72 consecutive hours (
Figure 3b). Even though the final route added 276 nm to the total sailing distance, only about 7 mts of fuel and 4.5 h of sailing distance were added as a cost to enable the vessel to safely sail through the Arabian Sea during heavy weather.