Next Article in Journal
Digital Denture Cast-Free Workflow Merging Concepts and Advantages of Mucostatics and Mucocompressive Philosophies
Previous Article in Journal
A Technique to Integrate a Simultaneous Tooth- and Bone-Supported Surgical Guide for Lateral Sinus Lift and Precision Corticotomy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Tissue Engineering in Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment: A Narrative Review

by
Rosana Farjaminejad
1,
Samira Farjaminejad
1,
Melika Hasani
2,
Franklin Garcia-Godoy
3,
Babak Sayahpour
4,
Anand Marya
5,6 and
Abdolreza Jamilian
6,7,*
1
Department of Health Services Research and Management, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 7519619555, Iran
3
Department of Bioscience Research, Bioscience Research Center, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
4
Department of Orthodontics, Johann-Wolfgang Goethe University, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
5
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh 12211, Cambodia
6
The City of London Dental School, University of Greater Manchester, Bolton BL3 5AB, UK
7
Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 7519619555, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 22 January 2025 / Revised: 17 February 2025 / Accepted: 3 March 2025 / Published: 20 March 2025

Abstract

:
Background: Orthodontics and orthognathic surgery present challenges such as extended treatment durations, patient discomfort, and complications like root resorption. Recent advancements in tissue engineering and nanotechnology offer promising solutions by improving bone regeneration, periodontal repair, and biomaterial integration. Objectives: This review explores the integration of scaffold-based tissue engineering and nanotechnology in orthodontics, focusing on their roles in accelerating bone regeneration, reducing treatment times, and minimizing adverse effects to enhance the predictability and success of orthodontic interventions. Methods: Relevant literature was selected from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on studies related to scaffold technology, biomaterials, and nanotechnology in orthodontics. Keywords included “tissue engineering”, “orthodontics”, “biomaterials”, “scaffolds”, “nanotechnology”, and “bone regeneration”. Priority was given to peer-reviewed original studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses addressing innovative treatment approaches and clinical outcomes. Results: Findings indicate that scaffolds enhance bone regeneration and periodontal repair, while nanoparticles improve biomaterial integration and drug delivery efficiency. These advancements contribute to faster, more predictable orthodontic treatments with reduced complications. However, challenges such as high costs, regulatory hurdles, and the need for long-term clinical validation remain barriers to widespread adoption. Conclusions: Tissue engineering and nanotechnology offer minimally invasive, biologically driven solutions for orthodontic treatment. While significant progress has been made, further clinical studies, cost-effective strategies, and regulatory approvals are needed to integrate these innovations into routine practice.

1. Introduction

Orthodontics plays a crucial role in addressing dental malocclusions and skeletal deformities, but traditional methods face significant limitations [1]. Conventional treatments typically require lengthy durations, frequent clinical visits, and pose risks such as root resorption, relapse, and considerable patient discomfort. Moreover, these treatments may not fully account for the intricate biological processes of bone and tissue remodeling, which are essential during orthodontic tooth movement [2,3]. As patient demands shift toward faster, more efficient, and less invasive treatments, the field of orthodontics faces a pressing need for innovation.
Recent years have witnessed transformative advancements in tissue engineering, scaffold technology, and nanotechnology, reshaping the landscape of orthodontic solutions [4]. Tissue engineering, for instance, focuses on the regeneration of oral tissues, such as bone and periodontal ligaments, through biomimetic processes, which are essential for treatments that require rapid healing and lasting results [5]. A scaffold in tissue engineering is a three-dimensional structure that provides a temporary framework for supporting cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation, ultimately facilitating new tissue formation. These scaffolds, made from natural or synthetic biomaterials, are designed to mimic the extracellular matrix and promote bone regeneration in orthodontic and orthognathic applications.
Orthodontic treatments exert mechanical forces on teeth and surrounding tissues, which can lead to various biological and clinical complications. Studies have shown that orthodontic tooth movement induces an increase in interleukin-1β (IL-1β), a pro-inflammatory cytokine in gingival crevicular fluid, contributing to periodontal tissue inflammation and destruction [6]. Furthermore, prolonged orthodontic treatments may cause white spot lesions—areas of demineralization on enamel surfaces—leading to esthetic and structural concerns [7]. Another well-documented risk is root resorption, where excessive force results in the loss of root structure, potentially compromising tooth stability [8]. Additionally, orthodontic treatments can alter soft tissue appearance in the lower third of the face, impacting facial aesthetics and patient satisfaction [9].
Tissue engineering presents a promising solution to mitigate these challenges by facilitating accelerated tissue repair, controlled inflammatory responses, and improved bone remodeling. By integrating bioactive scaffolds, nanotechnology, and biomimetic strategies, researchers are developing biologically adaptive materials that enhance healing, reduce unwanted side effects, and improve overall treatment outcomes.
Scaffold technology further enhances tissue engineering by incorporating biocompatible and bioresorbable materials that support tissue regeneration while maintaining structural integrity during the bone remodeling process under orthodontic forces [10]. These scaffolds, whether synthesized from natural or synthetic materials, are meticulously designed to stimulate tissue growth and serve as matrices for cell migration and differentiation, significantly reducing tissue stress and minimizing risks such as root resorption [11].
Additionally, nanotechnology introduces a remarkable level of precision in orthodontic care. By manipulating materials at the molecular scale, nanomaterials, such as nano-enhanced polymers and coatings, enhance the mechanical properties, durability, and biocompatibility of orthodontic appliances [10,11]. In contrast, nanoparticles—discrete nanoscale particles such as silver, zinc oxide, or hydroxyapatite—serve functional roles, including antimicrobial protection, osteogenic stimulation, and targeted drug delivery [12,13,14].
This distinction is crucial: nanomaterials contribute to the structural integrity of orthodontic devices, while nanoparticles interact with biological tissues at the cellular level, enhancing bone regeneration and minimizing complications [15].
Given these advancements, this review aims to explore the integration of scaffold-based tissue engineering and nanotechnology in orthodontic and orthognathic treatments. Specifically, we will examine recent developments in scaffold design, the role of bioactive molecules, and the impact of nanomaterials on tissue regeneration. Furthermore, we will highlight current challenges, clinical applications, and future directions to optimize patient outcomes through innovative biomaterials and personalized treatment approaches.

2. Methodology

This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in tissue engineering applications in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Relevant literature was selected from peer-reviewed journals, focusing on studies related to scaffold technologies, biomaterials, nanotechnology, and their clinical applications. Sources were identified through databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, prioritizing recent research published in the last decade. Emphasis was placed on original studies, review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses that provide insights into innovative treatment approaches, challenges, and future perspectives.

3. Tissue Engineering in Orthodontics

Recent advancements in tissue engineering are set to revolutionize the field of orthodontics through the innovative applications of stem cell technology and bioprinting [16] Figure 1 and Figure 2. These technologies utilize undifferentiated stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), along with precision bioprinting techniques to create scaffolds that closely mimic the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) of dental tissues. These scaffolds facilitate not only the structural and functional repair of craniofacial tissues but also enable customized treatments for dental malocclusions and other dentofacial anomalies [17,18]. For example, scaffolds seeded with ASCs demonstrated accelerated orthodontic tooth movement by stimulating PDL reorganization and enhancing bone remodeling in animal models [17,18].
Figure 3 illustrates the complex interaction between dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), fibroblasts, and endothelial cells in promoting tissue regeneration and angiogenesis during orthodontic treatments. The integration of DPSCs into the bone remodeling process leads to the differentiation of osteoblast progenitors and osteocytes. Fibroblasts, under the influence of extracellular matrix components (e.g., CG1, CG3), proliferate and differentiate to repair tissues. Angiogenesis is facilitated by the activation and budding of endothelial cells, forming microvascular networks that enhance the healing process. The figure also emphasizes the role of microRNAs and signaling pathways, such as Akt and STAT3, in regulating cellular proliferation and differentiation, critical for tissue regeneration under orthodontic forces [19].
The strategic application of these advanced techniques promises to enhance regenerative capabilities within orthodontics, leading to more effective management of complex dental cases [5]. Additionally, bioprinted scaffolds integrated with extracellular vesicles from MSCs have shown improved bone density and healing in craniofacial defect models [17]. These findings underscore the potential of integrating stem cell therapies with advanced biomaterials to achieve predictable and efficient therapeutic outcomes.
In addition, the integration of smart biomaterials is reshaping treatment modalities in orthodontics. Engineered to respond adaptively to changes within the oral environment, such as pH and temperature fluctuations, these materials dynamically interact with biological tissues [22]. This interaction promotes faster and more predictable tooth movement while also reducing common orthodontic complications like root resorption and inadequate bone healing, thereby improving the overall treatment process [23]. Shape-memory alloys used in orthodontic wires adjust pressure based on intraoral conditions to optimize tooth movement without manual adjustments, and pH-responsive polymers release antimicrobial agents in response to bacterial activity, protecting against decay and infection near orthodontic fixtures [24,25]. For example, hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds loaded with VEGF have been shown to enhance angiogenesis and bone regeneration in craniofacial models, overcoming limitations like poor vascularization [18].
However, many challenges remain for the tissue engineering of dental, oral, and craniofacial structures. Considerations such as the high demand for aesthetics, appropriate vascularization, the complex environment, the need to accommodate multiple tissue phenotypes, and the overall integration into functional systems are major determinants [26,27]. For instance, scaffolds derived from natural extracellular matrices (ECMs), such as those produced by MSCs, have shown superior proliferation and osteogenic differentiation compared to synthetic scaffolds [17,18]. These approaches emphasize the need to incorporate signaling molecules like VEGF and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) to promote angiogenesis and cellular integration in engineered tissues [28,29].
To address these challenges, recent studies have explored combining biomimetic scaffolds with advanced manufacturing techniques, such as 3D and 4D printing, to create personalized devices tailored to individual patient needs. For example, magnesium-doped bioceramic scaffolds were used to regenerate mandibular defects, demonstrating exceptional mechanical properties and osteogenic potential in preclinical trials [30]. Additionally, customized titanium implants fabricated using CBCT data reduced surgical time and improved osseointegration in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures [17].
These technological integrations into clinical orthodontics suggest a future where treatments are not only more efficient but also less invasive. This enhances patient comfort and satisfaction by minimizing treatment duration and improving aesthetic outcomes [31]. For example, bioengineered scaffolds seeded with MSCs demonstrated significant enhancements in bone density and accelerated orthodontic tooth movement in vivo, reducing relapse rates and treatment times [32]. Such findings highlight the potential of these approaches to revolutionize traditional orthodontic practices [18].
As these technologies continue to evolve, they hold the promise of transforming orthodontic practices into more adaptive, efficient, and patient-centered healthcare services. The ongoing development and clinical integration of bioprinted tissues, stem cell applications, and smart biomaterials are pushing the boundaries of what is possible in orthodontic care, marking a significant leap forward in the management and treatment of dental and facial irregularities [33].

4. Scaffold Systems in Orthodontics

4.1. Transforming Orthodontic Treatment Through Adaptive Technologies

Smart scaffolds signify a revolutionary step in orthodontic treatments, engineered to dynamically interact with the biological environment of the oral cavity [34]. These systems are not passive structures; they actively respond to changes in mechanical stresses and biochemical signals. This adaptability is critical in promoting effective tissue regeneration and mitigating complications such as inflammation or unwanted tissue growth [35]. For instance, smart scaffolds can detect increased pH levels indicative of inflammation and respond by releasing anti-inflammatory agents directly at the site, thereby improving the healing process and patient comfort [36]. Advanced materials such as hydrogels that exhibit stimuli-responsive properties are frequently used in these scaffolds. These materials can alter their behavior in response to temperature, pH, or mechanical forces, making them ideal for the fluctuating conditions within the oral cavity [16]. For example, a rise in local pH due to bacterial activity can trigger the scaffold to release encapsulated antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory agents directly at the site of infection or inflammation. This localized drug delivery system not only targets therapeutic actions more precisely but also reduces systemic side effects [37,38].
Moreover, the integration of nanotechnology plays a crucial role in enhancing the functional properties of these scaffolds. Nanoparticles can be engineered to provide improved scaffold strength, controlled degradation rates, and enhanced biocompatibility. They can also be used to create a more conducive microenvironment for osteointegration, crucial for the stability of orthodontic implants and appliances. For example, nanoparticles of bioactive glass or calcium phosphate can be incorporated into the scaffold matrix to enhance mineral deposition and bone growth. Figure 4 illustrates the integration of these technologies, emphasizing how scaffolds incorporating nanoparticles can accelerate orthodontic bone remodeling and reduce treatment duration [20]. By harnessing the potential of these adaptive technologies, orthodontic treatment is significantly advancing toward more personalized, effective, and less invasive therapies. This tailored approach not only ensures better alignment of the teeth and jaw but also supports the overall health of the oral tissues, promoting faster recovery times and improved long-term outcomes for patients [39,40,41,42].

4.2. Advanced Fabrication Techniques

4.2.1. Revolutionizing Scaffold Design with 3D Printing

Leveraging 3D printing technologies, modern orthodontics has seen a significant shift toward customized scaffold designs that enhance both treatment efficacy and patient comfort [43]. These advanced fabrication techniques employ a diverse array of biocompatible materials, such as polylactic acid (PLA), composite materials blending polymers with ceramic particles, and pure ceramic options such as hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate. Each material is selected for its unique properties: polymers for their flexibility and ease of manipulation, composites for their enhanced mechanical strength and osteoconductivity, and ceramics for their biocompatibility and bone-bonding capabilities [44,45,46].
In orthodontics, 3D printing has enabled precise, patient-specific scaffold designs that are customized to the topographical and morphological features of the patient’s dental anatomy. This process begins with a detailed digital scan of the patient’s oral structures, which is converted into a sophisticated 3D model. The ability of 3D printers to layer materials with precision down to micrometers ensures that each scaffold fits perfectly, optimizing contact with existing bone and soft tissues to encourage better integration and reduce the risk of implant failure [47,48]. Recent innovations in additive manufacturing (3D printing) include the development of thermal stimulus-based hydroxyapatite-reinforced PLA scaffolds, which not only provide structural support but also exhibit shape-memory properties that adapt to environmental stimuli like temperature changes. This technology, known as bioprinting, constructs vital tissues that mimic the natural bone structure, allowing scaffolds to be bioactive, fostering more natural bone integration. Additionally, bioprinting with materials like collagen and bio-inks enables the development of more complex scaffolds that can support soft tissue regeneration alongside bone repair [49,50,51].
Stereolithography (SLA), fused deposition modeling (FDM), and digital light processing (DLP) are three primary 3D printing techniques used in orthodontics [52]. These methods differ in their precision and application. SLA produces highly accurate models with smooth surfaces, making it ideal for aligner molds and occlusal splints, though it requires post-processing. FDM, a more cost-effective method, extrudes thermoplastic layers but has lower precision and surface quality, making it suitable for study models rather than clinical use. DLP, like SLA, cures entire layers at once, offering high accuracy with faster printing times but still requiring post-processing. While SLA and DLP are preferred for precision appliances, FDM remains useful for educational models. As technology advances, improved materials and processes will further enhance 3D printing applications in orthodontics [53,54].

4.2.2. Functionally Enhanced Scaffold Design

The scaffolds produced through 3D printing are not only designed to fit the patient’s unique anatomy but can also be customized to include functional features such as micro-pores or channels to facilitate vascularization and nerve growth, which are critical for the long-term success of implants and bone regeneration. These structures may be impregnated with growth factors or anti-inflammatory agents that are gradually released to promote healing, prevent infection, and support rapid bone integration [55,56].
Moreover, the addition of nanoparticles into the scaffold matrix significantly enhances its functional properties. For instance, bioactive nanoparticles like calcium phosphate and bioactive glass improve mineral deposition and bone growth, while metal nanoparticles such as silver enhance the antimicrobial properties of orthodontic appliances. These nanoparticles can be embedded into the scaffold to promote osseointegration while minimizing the risk of bacterial infections during orthodontic treatment [57].

4.2.3. Precision and Customization in Clinical Practice

3D printing allows orthodontists to plan and simulate treatment with a high degree of precision. Software tools such as CAD (computer-aided design) and CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) facilitate the virtual planning of orthodontic treatments, allowing for the customization of appliances like clear aligners and retainers. This level of customization improves patient outcomes by reducing the treatment duration and enhancing overall comfort [58]. Orthodontic appliances like retainers, aligners, and even complex mini-implant-supported devices can be fabricated with greater accuracy and durability using 3D printing technologies. Appliances such as palatal expanders and customized mini-implants are created with biocompatible materials, ensuring that they offer mechanical strength and patient-specific functionality [59,60]. By leveraging these advanced fabrication techniques, orthodontic treatments are becoming more personalized, efficient, and less invasive. The ability to design and manufacture precise, patient-specific scaffolds and appliances reduces the duration of orthodontic therapy, minimizes complications, and improves prognostic outcomes, making the treatment journey more comfortable and efficient for patients.

4.2.4. Integration into Clinical Practice

The integration of smart scaffolds into everyday clinical practice requires a comprehensive approach involving multiple disciplines. Collaboration between orthodontists, material scientists, and bioengineers is essential to tailor scaffold designs that are both effective and safe for patient use [61]. This multidisciplinary effort ensures that each scaffold is not only functionally optimal but also customized to the individual’s specific clinical needs. Moreover, the introduction of these innovative materials into the market must navigate complex regulatory pathways to verify their safety and efficacy. Orthodontic professionals must also consider ethical aspects, including patient consent and the long-term implications of implanting new biotechnologies, ensuring that these advanced treatments align with the highest standards of patient care and regulatory compliance. Building on the comprehensive role of nanoparticles in orthodontics, it is crucial to delve deeper into how these tiny yet powerful agents are revolutionizing the field. Nanoparticles, due to their ultra-small size, interact at a cellular level, offering unprecedented opportunities to enhance the material properties of orthodontic appliances and contribute to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine within the oral cavity [62,63,64].

5. Role of Nanoparticles in Orthodontic Regeneration

The synthesis of new nanoparticle formulations involves manipulating materials at the molecular scale to improve their compatibility and functionality within biological systems. For orthodontic applications, this often means enhancing the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of appliances [65]. Techniques such as sol-gel processing, chemical vapor deposition, and controlled precipitation are employed to create nanoparticles that are consistently uniform in size and shape [66,67]. These nanoparticles can be metals, ceramics, or composites, depending on the desired properties. For instance, nanoparticles like silica or polymeric nanoparticles are synthesized to fill microvoids in orthodontic composites, enhancing their mechanical strength and durability under the constant stress of orthodontic adjustments [68].
Multifunctional nanoparticles are tailored to address multiple challenges in orthodontics simultaneously. These include improving the antimicrobial properties of orthodontic appliances to reduce the risk of plaque buildup and infection, and enhancing the mechanical properties to withstand the biomechanical forces exerted during dental correction procedures [69]. Silver nanoparticles, for example, are incorporated into the surfaces of brackets and wires, offering sustained antimicrobial activity due to their ability to release silver ions, which are lethal to bacteria [70]. On the mechanical front, nanoparticles like titanium dioxide can be added to ceramic brackets to improve their fracture toughness and wear resistance [69].

5.1. Specific Areas of Application

5.1.1. Brackets and Wires

Nanoparticles such as tungsten disulfide (WS2), titanium nitride (TiN), and zinc oxide (ZnO) are incorporated into the manufacturing of orthodontic brackets and wires to significantly improve surface smoothness. By filling surface irregularities and forming lubricating layers, these nanoparticles reduce frictional resistance and wear between brackets and arch wires, which is critical for enhancing the efficiency of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. For instance, WS2 and ZnO coatings have demonstrated up to 50–64% friction reduction, facilitating smoother sliding mechanics. Additionally, coatings like silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and TiN offer antimicrobial properties, reducing bacterial adhesion and inhibiting biofilm formation around orthodontic appliances. This dual benefit—friction reduction and antimicrobial action—not only improves patient oral hygiene but also minimizes complications like plaque-induced gingivitis and white spot lesions, ensuring safer and more effective orthodontic outcome [67,71].

5.1.2. Adhesives and Cements

Nanoparticles such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), zinc oxide (ZnO), and bioactive glass nanoparticles (BGNs) are incorporated into dental adhesives and cements to enhance bonding strength and introduce antibacterial properties. These nanoparticles interact at the adhesive-tooth interface to form stronger mechanical bonds, reducing the likelihood of bracket detachment during orthodontic treatment. For example, ZnO nanoparticles improve the microshear bond strength while simultaneously inhibiting the growth of cariogenic bacteria like Streptococcus mutans. AgNPs, due to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, significantly reduce biofilm formation at the adhesive interface, minimizing the risk of white spot lesions and enamel demineralization. Additionally, the incorporation of nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) promotes remineralization of surrounding enamel, providing added protection against acidic environments. This combined enhancement in adhesion performance and antibacterial efficacy ensures more durable orthodontic outcomes and improved patient oral health throughout treatment [67,72].

5.1.3. Coatings on Appliances

Special nanoparticle-based coatings are applied to orthodontic appliances to enable the continuous release of therapeutic agents such as ions [e.g., silver (Ag+), fluoride (F), and calcium (Ca2+)] or drugs. These coatings provide dual action; they help control demineralization and promoting remineralization of tooth enamel surrounding orthodontic brackets. For instance, coatings infused with fluoride-releasing nanoparticles create a sustained release mechanism that reinforces enamel integrity and inhibits acid-induced demineralization. Similarly, calcium phosphate nanoparticles or bioactive glass nanoparticles (BGNs) release essential ions to support enamel remineralization, restoring lost mineral content. In addition, silver nanoparticle (AgNP) coatings contribute antimicrobial properties, reducing bacterial biofilm formation and preventing conditions like white spot lesions and enamel decay. This continuous therapeutic delivery ensures long-term protection of the tooth surface, improving patient outcomes during orthodontic treatment [67,73].
The table below categorizes various scaffold materials used in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery, detailing their material type, roles in treatment, and significance (Table 1). It highlights both traditional and nanoparticle-enhanced materials, showcasing their applications and importance in improving treatment outcomes.

6. Growth Factors in Orthodontic Tissue Engineering: Enhancing Treatment and Recovery

Recent advancements in the field of orthodontics have highlighted the transformative role of growth factors in tissue engineering, which are essential for promoting the regenerative processes necessary for successful orthodontic treatments [112]. Growth factors such as Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs), Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), and Insulin-like Growth Factors (IGF) play pivotal roles in stimulating migration, proliferation, and differentiation of cells involved in bone and periodontal tissue regeneration [113,114] (Figure 4, Table 2).
The study by Radermacher et al. illustrates the sophisticated interplay between mechanical stimuli and biological agents. This research reveals that when mesenchymal stem cells are subjected to controlled compressive forces in the presence of specific growth factors, there is a marked enhancement in osteogenic differentiation and alignment. These insights are crucial for clinical orthodontics, where manipulating cellular behavior through mechanical and biochemical cues can optimize tissue remodeling and accelerate treatment processes [115].
Furthermore, the integration of growth factors into various delivery systems such as biocompatible scaffolds and slow-releasing matrices is critically discussed in the review presented by Montemurro et al. These systems are designed to address traditional challenges in orthodontic treatment by providing a localized, sustained release of growth factors, thus maintaining their stability and bioactivity over extended periods. Such innovative delivery mechanisms ensure that the therapeutic potential of growth factors is fully realized, promoting efficient and effective healing and regeneration [62].
Figure 4. A schematic representing the biological events of the Tooth biology of movement. Growth factors, when correctly applied, can significantly enhance the outcomes of orthodontic treatments by improving the regeneration capabilities of bone and periodontal tissues. This integration of growth factors into orthodontic practice not only promises more predictable clinical outcomes but also opens the door to novel therapeutic strategies that could redefine traditional treatment methodologies. As research continues to evolve, the potential for these biomolecules in clinical applications continues to expand, marking a new era in orthodontic tissue engineering that leverages the power of biological and mechanical sciences to treat complex dental and skeletal irregularities. Adopted from [114].
Figure 4. A schematic representing the biological events of the Tooth biology of movement. Growth factors, when correctly applied, can significantly enhance the outcomes of orthodontic treatments by improving the regeneration capabilities of bone and periodontal tissues. This integration of growth factors into orthodontic practice not only promises more predictable clinical outcomes but also opens the door to novel therapeutic strategies that could redefine traditional treatment methodologies. As research continues to evolve, the potential for these biomolecules in clinical applications continues to expand, marking a new era in orthodontic tissue engineering that leverages the power of biological and mechanical sciences to treat complex dental and skeletal irregularities. Adopted from [114].
Oral 05 00021 g004
Table 2. Growth factors and cytokines involved in orthodontic bone remodeling, detailing their roles, mechanisms, and significance in orthodontic treatments. References provide further context and evidence for their applications.
Table 2. Growth factors and cytokines involved in orthodontic bone remodeling, detailing their roles, mechanisms, and significance in orthodontic treatments. References provide further context and evidence for their applications.
Growth Factor/CytokineRole in Orthodontic Bone RemodelingMechanism of ActionSignificance in OrthodonticsRefs.
Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)Influences cell differentiation and proliferation. Modulates bone remodeling.Stimulates the production of matrix proteins and downregulates matrix degradation, affecting tissue structure.Essential for the regulation of cellular activities during tooth movement and stabilization of the newly formed bone.[116,117,118]
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (VEGFs)Promotes angiogenesis and tissue regeneration.Induces endothelial cell proliferation, promotes vessel permeability, and enhances the migration and formation of blood vessels.Critical for ensuring adequate blood supply for bone healing and regeneration during mechanical stress in orthodontics.[22,119,120]
Platelet-Derived Growth Factors (PDGFs)Crucial for cell recruitment and proliferation necessary for bone regeneration and repair.Attracts cells such as fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and monocytes to the site of injury, promoting remodeling of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone.Supports the movement of teeth and the repair of periodontal tissues, enhancing the response to orthodontic forces.[118,119,120,121]
Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 (FGF2)Supports proliferation and differentiation of various cells, aiding in angiogenesis and wound healing.Stimulates endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and other cells, enhancing their proliferation and activities necessary for tissue repair and vascular growth.Important for rapid tissue repair and regeneration, particularly in the dental pulp during and after orthodontic appliance activation.[120,121,122]
Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)Supports wound healing and tissue regeneration, responsive to mechanical forces.Acts on various cell types to promote cellular proliferation, movement, and survival; has anti-fibrotic effects.Enhance tissue repair and regeneration around moving teeth, minimizing treatment time and improving outcomes.[115,123,124]
Osteoprotegerin (OPG)Inhibits osteoclast activation, preventing excessive bone resorption.Functions as a decoy receptor for RANKL, inhibiting its ability to bind RANK on osteoclasts and thus preventing osteoclastogenesis.Plays a crucial role in maintaining alveolar bone density and preventing unwanted bone loss during tooth movement.[125,126]
Soluble Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-Β Ligand (sRANKL)Promotes osteoclast differentiation and activity, influencing bone resorption.Binds to RANK on osteoclast precursors, promoting their maturation and activity, essential for bone remodeling.Vital for the controlled resorption of bone necessary to accommodate tooth realignment.[127,128]
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs)Stimulates osteoblast differentiation, crucial for bone formation and healing.Induces the transformation of stem cells into bone-forming osteoblast cells, also induces the production of other growth factors in the osteoblasts.Plays a pivotal role in the regeneration of bone defects and enhances the stability of teeth post-orthodontic treatment.[129,130,131]
Insulin-like Growth Factors (IGFs)Enhances osteoblast proliferation, contributing to bone density and growth.Mediates growth hormone effects, leading to cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis in osteoblastic cells.Supports rapid remodeling required during tooth movement, ensuring timely adjustment to the desired positions.[132,133,134]
Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF)Involved in connective tissue development and repair, significant for periodontal ligament adjustments.Promotes extracellular matrix production in connective tissues, influencing fibroblast proliferation and angiogenesis.Essential for the repair and regeneration of periodontal ligament and surrounding soft tissue during orthodontic treatment.[135,136]
Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α)Regulate inflammation and bone resorption processes; influence osteoclastic activity.Pro-inflammatory cytokines that stimulate osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption while modulating immune response in periodontal tissues.Their regulation is crucial for balancing bone formation and resorption, affecting the stability and duration of treatment.[21,137,138]

7. Future Directions of Role of Artificial Inelligence (AI) and Machine Learning in Personalizing Orthodontic Treatment

7.1. AI in the Design of Tissue-Engineered Products and Nanoparticle-Enhanced Materials

AI and machine learning (ML) have the potential to transform the design and customization of tissue-engineered products and nanoparticles by making the process more data-driven and predictive [139]. In orthodontic tissue engineering, AI can analyze vast amounts of biological, mechanical, and chemical data to identify optimal designs for scaffolds used in tissue regeneration [140]. For example, AI models can simulate the behavior of various biocompatible materials, such as polycarbonates, and predict their success in promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation under different clinical conditions [141].
AI can also enhance the customization of nanoparticle-based therapies by predicting how these particles interact with tissues at the molecular level. For example, nanoparticles used for delivering osteogenic agents (like calcium or growth factors) can be optimized using AI algorithms that consider the particle size, shape, surface chemistry, and targeted release mechanisms. These predictions help in refining nanoparticle formulations that work best for individual patients’ specific tissue environments [142,143].
In practice, AI systems will learn from previous patient outcomes and continuously refine the design and effectiveness of tissue-engineered scaffolds and nanoparticles by using feedback loops. They could analyze patient data such as healing rates, bone density, and immune response, and then suggest adjustments to the scaffold design or nanoparticle delivery strategy to optimize recovery. This iterative improvement is a key advantage of AI over traditional trial-and-error approaches in material design [139,144].

7.2. AI-Driven Personalization: Genetic Profiles and Predictive Modeling

AI can truly personalize orthodontic treatments by incorporating genetic profiles and using predictive modeling to forecast how a specific patient will respond to treatment [145]. AI systems can process genetic data, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and other genomic variations, to determine how likely a patient is to benefit from a specific orthodontic device or treatment protocol [146]. For example, patients with specific genetic markers may have different tissue regeneration capacities, which can be considered when designing tissue scaffolds or selecting nanoparticle-based interventions. In addition, AI-powered feedback loops play a crucial role in the continuous personalization of treatments. One of AI’s most powerful capabilities is its ability to learn from data and refine predictions over time [146,147]. In orthodontic treatment, AI can operate within feedback loops that continuously gather data from patients throughout the process. A patient’s healing progress can be monitored using wearable sensors or regular imaging, allowing AI systems to adjust the treatment plan in real time. This dynamic approach ensures that treatments are tailored to the patient’s evolving biological responses [144]. For instance, in tissue engineering, AI might monitor how quickly a scaffold integrates with surrounding tissue and suggest modifications to scaffold design or nanoparticle release profiles if healing is slower than expected [139]. In orthodontics, AI systems might adjust the forces applied by braces or aligners based on real-time data about tooth movement, thereby minimizing discomfort and improving outcomes [148]. Moreover, AI can analyze patient imaging, 3D scans, and treatment outcomes using machine learning algorithms to identify patterns that correlate with better treatment results for certain subpopulations [149]. This allows for the creation of highly customized treatment plans based not only on a patient’s biological characteristics but also on predictive outcomes derived from similar cases. As more data are collected, AI systems can continuously refine predictions, improving the personalization of treatments over time [150].

7.3. Multi-Modal Data Integration

AI’s ability to integrate multiple types of data (genetic, imaging, clinical history, and patient feedback) allows it to make comprehensive decisions. A personalized orthodontic treatment would not only consider the physical characteristics of a patient’s teeth and jaw structure (obtained from 3D imaging and CT scans) but also integrate genetic information to predict how fast the bone will regenerate and how tissues will respond to mechanical forces. Additionally, AI can assess lifestyle data, such as a patient’s diet, oral hygiene habits, and stress levels, which might influence the effectiveness of orthodontic interventions [151,152,153].

7.4. AI-Driven Predictive Models

Predictive models built using machine learning can anticipate treatment outcomes even before the intervention starts. For instance, in orthodontics, AI can predict the speed of tooth movement, and the response of bone and tissue based on a combination of factors, including genetic predispositions, the patient’s age, bone density, and treatment history [154]. These predictive models allow orthodontists to create more accurate treatment timelines and minimize the likelihood of adverse outcomes. By using advanced modeling techniques such as neural networks, AI can predict multiple complex interactions simultaneously, giving orthodontists tools to provide better-tailored treatments for each patient [155].
In orthodontics, AI is already being used in technologies such as customized 3D-printed aligners (e.g., Invisalign) [156]. AI algorithms analyze patient scans to create personalized aligners that are precisely shaped to guide teeth into their ideal positions [156]. This process ensures that each aligner is unique to the patient’s dental structure, and ML algorithms continuously adjust the aligners’ design as treatment progresses based on the rate of tooth movement. AI’s ability to predict how the teeth will shift over time ensures that the treatment is as efficient and comfortable as possible [157].

8. Discussion

Tissue engineering is shaping the future of orthodontic and orthognathic treatment, bringing solutions to challenges that have long frustrated both patients and clinicians—prolonged treatment times, root resorption, and unpredictable bone remodeling [2,16]. The use of biocompatible scaffolds, nanotechnology, and bioactive molecules is paving the way for treatments that work with the body rather than against it [158].
One of the biggest game changers in this field is scaffold technology. These structures do not just fill spaces; they guide tissue regeneration, helping bone and soft tissues grow where they are needed most. Thanks to 3D and 4D printing, these scaffolds can now be customized for each patient, offering a level of precision that was once impossible. But even with these advancements, we are still figuring out how to optimize their degradation rates and long-term stability to ensure they integrate seamlessly into the body [159].
Nanotechnology is another exciting area. Nanoparticles like hydroxyapatite, silver, and bioactive glass have been integrated into adhesives, cements, and brackets, helping to improve bone regeneration, antimicrobial properties, and material strength. However, while lab studies show promising results, we need more clinical trials to fully understand how these materials behave over time in the human body [65,160].
We are also seeing a growing role for growth factors, such as BMPs and VEGFs, which can accelerate bone remodeling and healing. While these biological molecules have the potential to shorten treatment time and reduce complications, delivering them in a controlled and sustained manner remains a challenge. They are too little, and they do not work. Too much, and they might trigger unwanted effects [113,114].
And then there’s AI—a tool that could personalize orthodontic treatments by predicting how different biomaterials interact with each patient’s bone structure. AI could optimize scaffold designs, adjust treatment plans in real time, and even suggest the best nanomaterial combinations. But we are still in the early stages, and before AI-driven orthodontics becomes the norm, we need more real-world data and regulatory approvals [141].

8.1. Limitations

Limited clinical evidence remains a major concern, as most studies are still in the preclinical stage, requiring long-term human trials to confirm safety and efficacy [161]. Variability in study methodologies makes it difficult to compare results, as different research groups use diverse biomaterials and testing approaches [162]. High costs and accessibility issues also limit widespread clinical adoption, with advanced technologies like bioprinting and AI-driven treatments requiring specialized expertise and equipment. Additionally, regulatory and ethical barriers pose challenges, particularly for stem cell-based therapies and gene-enhanced biomaterials [163,164]. Lastly, while this review focuses on emerging technologies, more comparative studies are needed to determine whether they truly outperform conventional orthodontic treatments.

8.2. Future Directions

Future research should prioritize large-scale clinical trials to validate biomaterials and scaffold-based therapies in real-world orthodontic applications. Standardizing biomaterial formulations will improve consistency and facilitate clinical translation. Advancements in 4D printing and smart biomaterials could lead to adaptive scaffolds that respond dynamically to oral conditions [165,166]. AI integration could enhance personalized treatment planning and material selection. Finally, efforts should focus on reducing costs and improving scalability to make these technologies more accessible for broader clinical use [167].
As we stand on the cusp of a new era in medical science, it is crucial for the orthodontic field to not only embrace these technological innovations but also ensure they are accessible and beneficial to all. The democratization of these advanced technologies is essential; they must not be available only to a select few but should reshape orthodontic care across diverse populations. Embracing this challenge is not just an opportunity but a responsibility, ensuring that the future of orthodontics remains as dynamic and effective as the technologies are driving its transformation.

9. Conclusions

The integration of nanotechnology, 3D printing, and bioengineered scaffolds is advancing orthodontic and orthognathic treatment by addressing key challenges such as prolonged treatment duration, inadequate bone regeneration, and biofilm-related complications [168,169]. Nanoparticles like silver, zinc oxide, and hydroxyapatite improve material strength, antimicrobial properties, and osteointegration, enhancing device longevity and treatment efficiency [103]. Meanwhile, 3D-printed scaffolds composed of hydroxyapatite, polylactic acid, and bioactive glass enable patient-specific bone regeneration, which is crucial for correcting severe malocclusions and supporting periodontal healing [170,171].
Beyond these material innovations, AI is transforming treatment by optimizing scaffold design, predicting tissue responses, and refining orthodontic force application [148]. The combination of nanotechnology, AI-driven simulations, and regenerative scaffolds ensures that emerging biomaterials meet clinical needs, improve patient outcomes, and gain regulatory approval [172].
However, long-term clinical validation remains a challenge. The biocompatibility, degradation kinetics, and mechanical stability of nano-enhanced materials and 3D-printed scaffolds require extensive vivo studies before widespread adoption. Additionally, regulatory hurdles and cost barriers limit accessibility [172,173]. Future research should focus on enhancing scaffold bioactivity with VEGF and BMPs, integrating AI-driven real-time treatment monitoring, and developing 4D-printed biomaterials that dynamically adapt to mechanical forces, improving tissue remodeling and reducing relapse risks [171].
By overcoming these challenges, nanotechnology, AI, and advanced biomaterials will enable more efficient, personalized, and accessible orthodontic treatments, marking a new era in orthodontic care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.F. and S.F.; methodology, R.F. and S.F.; software, M.H.; validation, A.M.; formal analysis, B.S.; investigation: S.F. resources, A.M.; data curation, A.J.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F. and S.F.; writing—review and editing, F.G.-G.; visualization, M.H.; supervision, R.F. and S.F.; project administration, R.F.; funding acquisition, A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farhadi, M.; Tashakor, A.; Farjaminejad, R.; Jamilian, A. Treatment of Maxillary Deficiency with Reverse Chin Cup: A Case Report. Eur. J. Dent. Oral Health 2023, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Meeran, N.A. Iatrogenic possibilities of orthodontic treatment and modalities of prevention. J. Orthod. Sci. 2013, 2, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, Y.; Zhan, Q.; Bao, M.; Yi, J.; Li, Y. Biomechanical and biological responses of periodontium in orthodontic tooth movement: Up-date in a new decade. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2021, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ganji, N.R.; Hassanvand, A.; Zandi, A.; Rabbanidoost, A.; Safdari, S.; Jouzdani, K.M.; Naseri, M.; Amiri, M. Emerging Innovations: Cutting-Edge Medical and Dental Advances Transforming Healthcare; Nobel Sciences: Pune, India; Available online: https://books.google.com/books/about/Emerging_Innovations_Cutting_Edge_Medica.html?id=icj0EAAAQBAJ (accessed on 17 February 2025).
  5. Abid, M.; Jamal, H.; Alsahafi, E.; Dziedzic, A.; Kubina, R. Tissue Engineering Supporting Regenerative Strategies to Enhance Clinical Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics: A Scoping, Perspective Review. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Motyl, S.; Manfredini, D.; Oruba, Z.; Bugajska, J.; Sztefko, K.; Stós, W.; Osiewicz, M.; Loster, B.W.; Lobbezoo, F. Evaluation of interleukin-1 beta and the ratio of interleukin-1 beta to interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic canine retraction. Dent. Med. Probl. 2021, 58, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yazarloo, S.; Arab, S.; Mirhashemi, A.H.; Gholamrezayi, E. Systematic review of preventive and treatment measures regarding orthodontically induced white spot lesions. Dent. Med. Probl. 2023, 60, 527–535. [Google Scholar]
  8. Villaman-Santacruz, H.; Torres-Rosas, R.; Acevedo-Mascarúa, A.E.; Argueta-Figueroa, L. Root resorption factors associated with orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent. Med. Probl. 2022, 59, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Soheilifar, S.; Ataei, H.; Mollabashi, V.; Amini, P.; Bakhshaei, A.; Naghdi, N. Extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment: Soft tissue profile changes in borderline class I patients. Dent. Med. Probl. 2020, 57, 275–283. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tahmasebi, E.; Alam, M.; Yazdanian, M.; Tebyanian, H.; Yazdanian, A.; Seifalian, A.; Mosaddad, S.A. Current biocompatible materials in oral regeneration: A comprehensive overview of composite materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 11731–11755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaukua, N.; Fried, K.; Mao, J.J. Regenerative Medicine in Orthodontic Therapy. Integr. Clin. Orthod. 2023, 30, 541–564. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomas, S.; Grohens, Y.; Ninan, N. (Eds.) Nanotechnology Applications for Tissue Engineering; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rossi, N.J.; Rossi, R.C.; Rossi, N.J.C. Procedures to accelerate orthodontic treatment: Review of techniques and biological bases. Int. J. Dent. Res. 2019, 4, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farjaminejad, S.; Hasani, M.; Farjaminejad, R.; Foroozandeh, A.; Abdouss, M.; Hasanzadeh, M. The critical role of nano-hydroxyapatites as an advanced scaffold in drug delivery towards efficient bone regeneration: Recent progress and challenges. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2025, 9, 100692. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yu, Y.; Li, X. Current Application of Magnetic Materials in the Dental Field. Magnetochemistry 2024, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matichescu, A.; Ardelean, L.C.; Rusu, L.C.; Craciun, D.; Bratu, E.A.; Babucea, M.; Leretter, M. Advanced biomaterials and techniques for oral tissue engineering and regeneration—A review. Materials 2020, 13, 5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kouhi, M.; de Souza Araújo, I.J.; Asa’ad, F.; Zeenat, L.; Bojedla, S.S.R.; Pati, F.; Zolfagharian, A.; Watts, D.C.; Bottino, M.C.; Bodaghi, M. Recent advances in additive manufacturing of patient-specific devices for dental and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Dent. Mater. 2024, 40, 700–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, C.; Sharpe, P.; Volponi, A.A. Applications of regenerative techniques in adult orthodontics. Front. Dent. Med. 2023, 3, 1100548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palanisamy, S. Exploring the Horizons of Four-Dimensional Printing Technology in Dentistry. Cureus 2024, 16, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaukua, N.; Fried, K.; Mao, J.J. Tissue engineering in orthodontic therapy. In Integrated Cclinical Orthodontics, 1st ed.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 380–391. [Google Scholar]
  21. Safari, S.; Mahdian, A.; Motamedian, S.R. Applications of stem cells in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: Current trends and future perspectives. World J. Stem Cells 2018, 10, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guarino, V.; Pérez, M.A.Á. (Eds.) Current Advances in Oral and Craniofacial Tissue Engineering; CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  23. Roberts, W.E.; Huja, S.S. Bone physiology, metabolism, and biomechanics in orthodontic practice. In Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques, 6th ed.; Mosby: St Louis, LA, USA, 2016; pp. 99–153. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hassan, R.; Aslam Khan, M.U.; Abdullah, A.M.; Abd Razak, S.I. A review on current trends of polymers in orthodontics: BPA-free and smart materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maroof, M.; Sujithra, R.; Tewari, R. Superelastic and shape memory equi-atomic nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) alloy in dentistry: A systematic review. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gupta, I.; Mangat, P. Bio Smart Dentistry; Dent Publications: Bijnor, India, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kretlow, J.D.; Young, S.; Klouda, L.; Wong, M.; Mikos, A.G. Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3368–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chung, S.; King, M.W. Design concepts and strategies for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2011, 58, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, W.; Yelick, C. Craniofacial tissue engineering. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018, 8, a025775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Papi, P.; Daniele, R.; Giardino, R.; di Carlo, S.; Piccoli, L.; Cascone, P.; Pompa, G. Prosthetic rehabilitation with partial removable and aesthetic dentures (Valplast) in a patient with recurrent right TMJ ankylosis: A case report. Minerva Stomatol. 2016, 65 (Suppl. S1), 245–246. [Google Scholar]
  31. Poulton, D.R. Preliminary program of the ninety-ninth annual session, May 14-18, 1999. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1999, 115, 186–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pathak, K.; Saikia, R.; Das, A.; Das, D.; Islam, M.A.; Pramanik, P.; Parasar, A.; Borthakur, P.P.; Sarmah, P.; Saikia, M.; et al. 3D printing in biomedicine: Advancing personalized care through additive manufacturing. Explor. Med. 2023, 4, 1135–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Murphy, N.C. In vivo tissue engineering for orthodontists: A modest first step Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Eruption, Resorption and Movement. In Biological Mechanisms of Tooth Eruption, Resorption and Movement; Harvard Society for the Advancement of Orthodontics: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 385–410. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gašparovič, M.; Jungová, P.; Tomášik, J.; Mriňáková, B.; Hirjak, D.; Timková, S.; Danišovič, Ľ.; Janek, M.; Bača, Ľ.; Peciar, P.; et al. Evolving Strategies and Materials for Scaffold Development in Regenerative Dentistry. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, Z.; Han, L.; Guo, Y.; Jia, L.; Yin, C.; Xia, Y. Nanotechnology in Dental Therapy and Oral Tissue Regeneration. In Nanotechnology in Regenerative Medicine and Drug Delivery Therapy; Xu, H., Gu, N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cui, H.; You, Y.; Cheng, G.W.; Lan, Z.; Zou, K.L.; Mai, Q.Y.; Han, Y.H.; Chen, H.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Yu, G.T. Advanced materials and technologies for oral diseases. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2023, 24, 2156257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kida, D.; Zakrzewska, A.; Zborowski, J.; Szulc, M.; Karolewicz, B. Polymer-based carriers in dental local healing—Review and future challenges. Materials 2021, 14, 3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tyrovola, J.B.; Spyropoulos, M.N. Effects of drugs and systemic factors on orthodontic treatment. Quintessence Int. 2001, 32, 5. [Google Scholar]
  39. Farjaminejad, S.; Farjaminejad, R.; Garcia-Godoy, F. Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Walmsley, G.G.; McArdle, A.; Tevlin, R.; Momeni, A.; Atashroo, D.; Hu, M.S.; Feroze, A.H.; Wong, V.W.; Lorenz, H.; Longaker, M.T.; et al. Nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015, 11, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Percival, K.M.; Paul, V.; Husseini, G.A. Recent Advancements in Bone Tissue Engineering: Integrating Smart Scaffold Technologies and Bio-Responsive Systems for Enhanced Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sehrawat, S.; Sidhu, M.S.; Grover, S.; Prabhakar, M. “A Century of Orthodontic Progress”–Innovations in Orthodontics. Orthod. J. Nepal 2021, 11, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Konda, P.; Rafiq, A.M. 3D printing: Changing the landscape of orthodontics. Technology 2024, 7, 9. [Google Scholar]
  44. Farjaminejad, S.; Farjaminejad, R.; Hasani, M.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Abdouss, M.; Marya, A.; Harsoputranto, A.; Jamilian, A. Advances and Challenges in Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Path Towards Personalized Regenerative Medicine. Polymers 2024, 16, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Farjaminejad, R.; Farjaminejad, S.; Nucci, L.; d’Apuzzo, F.; Grassia, V.; Majidi, K.; Jamilian, A. 3D Printing Approach in Maxillofacial Surgery in Iran: An Evaluation Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Omigbodun, F.T.; Oladapo, B.I.; Osa-uwagboe, N. Exploring the frontier of Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite composites in bone regeneration and their revolutionary biomedical applications–A review. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2024, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nesic, D.; Schaefer, B.M.; Sun, Y.; Saulacic, N.; Sailer, I. 3D printing approach in dentistry: The future for personalized oral soft tissue regeneration. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taneva, E.; Kusnoto, B.; Evans, C.A. 3D scanning, imaging, and printing in orthodontics. Issues Contemp. Orthod. 2015, 148, 862–867. [Google Scholar]
  49. Abueed, O.; Gharaibeh, B.; Alalawin, A.; Mahfouf, M.; Alsoussi, A.; Albashabsheh, N. The development of a radial based integrated network for the modelling of 3D fused deposition. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2022, 29, 408–421. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ryan, K.R.; Down, M.; Banks, C.E. Future of additive manufacturing: Overview of 4D and 3D printed smart and advanced materials and their applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Genova, T.; Roato, I.; Carossa, M.; Motta, C.; Cavagnetto, D.; Mussano, F. Advances on bone substitutes through 3D bioprinting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Atwal, N.; Bhatnagar, D. Evaluating and Comparing Flexure Strength of Dental Models Printed Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Digital Light Processing, and Stereolithography Apparatus Printers. Cureus 2024, 16, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pillai, S.; Upadhyay, A.; Khayambashi, P.; Farooq, I.; Sabri, H.; Tarar, M.; Lee, K.T.; Harb, I.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. Dental 3D-printing: Transferring art from the laboratories to the clinics. Polymers 2021, 13, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Scribante, A.; Gallo, S.; Pascadopoli, M.; Canzi, P.; Marconi, S.; Montasser, M.A.; Bressani, D.; Gandini, P.; Sfondrini, M.F. Properties of CAD/CAM 3D printing dental materials and their clinical applications in orthodontics: Where are we now? Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vyas, C. Development of a Multi-Material and Multi-Scale 3d Bioprinted Scaffold for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering; The University of Manchester: Manchester, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cui, Y.; Liu, H.; Tian, Y.; Fan, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Peng, C.; Wu, D. Dual-functional composite scaffolds for inhibiting infection and promoting bone regeneration. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 16, 100409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Balhaddad, A.A.; Kansara, A.A.; Hidan, D.; Weir, M.D.; Xu, H.H.; Melo, M.A.S. Toward dental caries: Exploring nanoparticle-based platforms and calcium phosphate compounds for dental restorative materials. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pouliezou, I.; Gravia, A.P.; Vasoglou, M. Digital Model in Orthodontics: Is It Really Necessary for Every Treatment Procedure? A Scoping Review. Oral 2024, 4, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tsoukala, E.; Lyros, I.; Tsolakis, A.I.; Maroulakos, M.; Tsolakis, I.A. Direct 3d-printed orthodontic retainers. a systematic review. Children 2023, 10, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sehrawat, S.; Kumar, A.; Prabhakar, M.; Nindra, J. The expanding domains of 3D printing pertaining to the speciality of orthodontics. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 50, 1611–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, L.; Morsi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ramakrishna, S. Review scaffold design and stem cells for tooth regeneration. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2013, 49, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Montemurro, N.; Pierozzi, E.; Inchingolo, A.M.; Pahwa, B.; De Carlo, A.; Palermo, A.; Scarola, R.; Dipalma, G.; Corsalini, M.; Inchingolo, A.D.; et al. New biograft solution, growth factors and bone regenerative approaches in neurosurgery, dentistry, and orthopedics: A review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 27, 16. [Google Scholar]
  63. Soraya, L.; Najoua, L.; Houda, L.; Malika, S.I. Latest Intelligent and Sustainable Materials for Dental Application. In Handbook of Intelligent and Sustainable Smart Dentistry; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2024; pp. 87–129. [Google Scholar]
  64. Batra, P. Applications of nanoparticles in orthodontics. Dent. Appl. Nanotechnol. 2018, 81–105. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-97634-1_5 (accessed on 17 February 2025).
  65. Farjaminejad, S.; Shojaei, S.; Goodarzi, V.; Khonakdar, H.A.; Abdouss, M. Tuning properties of bio-rubbers and its nanocomposites with addition of succinic acid and ɛ-caprolactone monomers to poly (glycerol sebacic acid) as main platform for application in tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 159, 110711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Al Othman, Z.A.; Alam, M.M.; Naushad, M.; Inamuddin, I.; Khan, M.F. Inorganic nanoparticles and nanomaterials based on titanium (Ti): Applications in medicine. In Materials Science Forum; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Bach, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 754, pp. 21–87. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, R.; Han, B.; Liu, X. Functional surface coatings on orthodontic appliances: Reviews of friction reduction, antibacterial properties, and corrosion resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shahabi, M.; Movahedi Fazel, S.; Rangrazi, A. Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles into a cold-cure orthodontic acrylic resin: Effects on mechanical properties. Biomimetics 2021, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zakrzewski, W.; Dobrzynski, M.; Dobrzynski, W.; Zawadzka-Knefel, A.; Janecki, M.; Kurek, K.; Lubojanski, A.; Szymonowicz, M.; Rybak, Z.; Wiglusz, R.J. Nanomaterials application in orthodontics. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gil, F.J.; Espinar-Escalona, E.; Clusellas, N.; Fernandez-Bozal, J.; Artes-Ribas, M.; Puigdollers, A. New bactericide orthodonthic archwire: NiTi with silver nanoparticles. Metals 2020, 10, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Indumathi, P.; Singh, D.; Sharma, V.K.; Shukla, N.K.; Chaturvedi, T. The effect of various nanoparticle coating on the frictional resistance at orthodontic wire and bracket interface: A systematic review. J. Orthod. Sci. 2022, 11, 7. [Google Scholar]
  72. Ferrando-Magraner, E.; Bellot-Arcís, C.; Paredes-Gallardo, V.; Almerich-Silla, J.M.; García-Sanz, V.; Fernández-Alonso, M.; Montiel-Company, J.M. Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles in dental restorative materials. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina 2020, 56, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yun, Z.; Qin, D.; Wei, F.; Xiaobing, L. Application of antibacterial nanoparticles in orthodontic materials. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11, 2433–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Brézulier, D.; Chaigneau, L.; Jeanne, S.; Lebullenger, R. The challenge of 3D bioprinting of composite natural polymers PLA/bioglass: Trends and benefits in cleft palate surgery. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pina, S.; Ferreira, J.M. 5—Bioresorbable composites for bone repair. In Biomedical Composites: Materials, Manufacturing and Engineering; De Gruyter: Boston, MA, USA; Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 69–88. [Google Scholar]
  76. Shah, R.; Sinanan, A.C.M.; Knowles, J.C.; Hunt, N.; Lewis, M. Craniofacial muscle engineering using a 3-dimensional phosphate glass fibre construct. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Takahashi, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Tanimoto, Y.; Yao-Umezawa, E.; Kasai, K. Biological evaluation of a prototype material made of polyglycolic acid and hydroxyapatite. J. Hard Tissue Biol. 2015, 24, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xu, X.; Yuan, Q.; Xu, L.; Hu, M.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, Y. Preparation and performance evaluation of a novel orthodontic adhesive incorporating composite dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate—Polycaprolactone fibers. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0304143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yuan, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, X.; Du, Y.; Xu, J.; Song, Y.; Wang, Y. Development and Characterization of Novel Orthodontic Adhesive Containing PCL–Gelatin–AgNPs Fibers. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kamran, M.A.; Alnazeh, A.A.; Hameed, M.S.; Yassin, S.M.; Mannakandath, M.L.; Alshahrani, I. Formulation and clinical performance of nanosilver loaded poly-l-glycolic acid modified orthodontic adhesive for orthodontic bonding. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1249, 131490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ahmadi, H.; Haddadi-Asl, V.; Ghafari, H.A.; Ghorbanzadeh, R.; Mazlum, Y.; Bahador, A. Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and anti-biofilm effects of a photoexcited modified orthodontic adhesive containing curcumin doped poly lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles: An ex-vivo biofilm model of S. mutans on the enamel slab bonded brackets. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 30, 101674. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sodagar, A.; Akhavan, A.; Hashemi, E.; Arab, S.; Pourhajibagher, M.; Sodagar, K.; Kharrazifard, M.J.; Bahador, A. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of a conventional orthodontic composite containing silver/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Prog. Orthod. 2016, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mohammed-Salih, H.S.; Ghazi, A.; Mahmood, R.I.; Al-Qazzaz, H.H.; Supian, F.L.; Al-Obaidi, J.R.; Jabir, M. Enhancing orthodontic treatment control with fish scale-derived hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: Insights from an animal model study. Saudi Dent. J. 2024, 36, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nishioka-Sakamoto, K.; Hotokezaka, H.; Hotokezaka, Y.; Nashiro, Y.; Funaki, M.; Ohba, S.; Yoshida, N. Fixation of an orthodontic anchor screw using beta-tricalcium phosphate in a screw-loosening model in rats. Angle Orthod. 2023, 93, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Niwa, K.; Ogawa, K.; Miyazawa, K.; Aoki, T.; Kawai, T.; Goto, S. Application of α-tricalcium phosphate coatings on titanium subperiosteal orthodontic implants reduces the time for absolute anchorage: A study using rabbit femora. Dent. Mater. J. 2009, 28, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Weijs, W.L.J.; Siebers, T.J.H.; Kuijpers-Jagtman, A.M.; Bergé, S.J.; Meijer, G.J.; Borstlap, W.A. Early secondary closure of alveolar clefts with mandibular symphyseal bone grafts and β-tri calcium phosphate (β-TCP). Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010, 39, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. El Shazley, N.; Hamdy, A.; El-Eneen, H.A.; El Backly, R.M.; Saad, M.M.; Essam, W.; Moussa, H.; El Tantawi, M.; Jain, H.; Marei, M.K. Bioglass in alveolar bone regeneration in orthodontic patients: Randomized controlled clinical trial. JDR Clin. Transl. Res. 2016, 1, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jafari, N.; Habashi, M.S.; Hashemi, A.; Shirazi, R.; Tanideh, N.; Tamadon, A. Application of bioactive glasses in various dental fields. Biomater. Res. 2022, 26, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Domagała, I.; Przystupa, K.; Firlej, M.; Pieniak, D.; Niewczas, A.; Biedziak, B. Bending behaviour of polymeric materials used on biomechanics orthodontic appliances. Materials 2020, 13, 5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Schickert, S.D.L. Polymer-Ceramic Nancomposites for Bone Regeneration. PhD Thesis, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Lisboa, Portugal, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  91. Cacciafesta, V.; Sfondrini, M.F.; Norcini, A.; Macchi, A. Fiber-reinforced composites in lingual orthodontics. J. Clin. Orthod. 2005, 39, 710. [Google Scholar]
  92. Khan, A.A.; Zafar, M.S.; Fareed, M.A.; AlMufareh, N.A.; Alshehri, F.; AlSunbul, H.; Lassila, L.; Garoushi, S.; Vallittu, K. Fiber-reinforced composites in dentistry–An insight into adhesion aspects of the material and the restored tooth construct. Dent. Mater. 2023, 39, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Milivojevic, M.; Pajic-Lijakovic, I.; Bugarski, B. Recent advances in alginates as material for biomedical applications. Alginates 2019, 25–88. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9780429023439-2/recent-advances-alginates-material-biomedical-applications-milan-milivojevic-ivana-pajic-lijakovic-branko-bugarski (accessed on 17 February 2025).
  94. Atia, G.A.; Shalaby, H.K.; Roomi, A.B.; Ghobashy, M.M.; Attia, H.A.; Mohamed, S.Z.; Abdeen, A.; Abdo, M.; Fericean, L.; Bănățean Dunea, I.; et al. Macro, micro, and nano-inspired bioactive polymeric biomaterials in therapeutic, and regenerative orofacial applications. Drug Design Dev. Ther. 2023, 17, 2985–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Uysal, T.; Akkurt, M.D.; Amasyali, M.; Ozcan, S.; Yagci, A.; Basak, F.; Sagdic, D. Does a chitosan-containing dentifrice prevent demineralization around orthodontic brackets? Angle Orthod. 2011, 81, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ly, N.T.K.; Shin, H.; Gupta, K.C.; Kang, I.K.; Yu, W. Bioactive antibacterial modification of orthodontic microimplants using chitosan biopolymer. Macromol. Res. 2019, 27, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Juárez, E.N. Biological effects of chitosan in Dentistry. Mex. J. Med. Res. ICSA 2023, 11, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tallarico, M.; Park, C.J.; Lumbau, A.I.; Annucci, M.; Baldoni, E.; Koshovari, A.; Meloni, S.M. Customized 3D-printed titanium mesh developed to regenerate a complex bone defect in the aesthetic zone: A case report approached with a fully digital workflow. Materials 2020, 13, 3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Alaneme, K.K.; Kareem, S.A.; Ozah, B.N.; Alshahrani, H.A.; Ajibuwa, O.A. Application of finite element analysis for optimizing selection and design of Ti-based biometallic alloys for fractures and tissues rehabilitation: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 19, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lee, S.J.; Heo, M.; Lee, D.; Han, S.; Moon, J.H.; Lim, H.N.; Kwon, I.K. Preparation and characterization of antibacterial orthodontic resin containing silver nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 432, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, L.; Liu, H.; Ding, M.; Dong, H.; Mou, Y. Therapeutic applications of antimicrobial silver-based biomaterials in dentistry. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 17, 443–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jasso-Ruiz, I.; Velazquez-Enriquez, U.; Scougall-Vilchis, R.J.; Morales-Luckie, R.A.; Sawada, T.; Yamaguchi, R. Silver nanoparticles in orthodontics, a new alternative in bacterial inhibition: In vitro study. Prog. Orthod. 2020, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. He, L.; Zhang, W.; Liu, J.; Pan, Y.; Li, S.; Xie, Y. Applications of nanotechnology in orthodontics: A comprehensive review of tooth movement, antibacterial properties, friction reduction, and corrosion resistance. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 2024, 23, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shoorgashti, R.; Shahrzad, H.; Nowroozi, S.; Ghadamgahi, B.; Mehrara, R.; Oroojalian, F. Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of Ag/ZnO nanoparticles loaded polycaprolactone/chitosan composites for dental applications. Nanomed. J. 2023, 10, 68. [Google Scholar]
  105. Sreenivasalu, K.; Dora, C.; Swami, R.; Jasthi, V.C.; Shiroorkar, N.; Nagaraja, S.; Asdaq, S.M.B.; Anwer, M.K. Nanomaterials in dentistry: Current applications and future scope. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Damiri, F.; Fatimi, A.; Musuc, A.M.; Santos, A.C.; Paszkiewicz, S.; Idumah, C.I.; Singh, S.; Varma, R.S.; Berrada, M. Nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAp) scaffolds for bone regeneration: Preparation, characterization and biological applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2024, 18, 105601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chatzipetros, E.; Yfanti, Z.; Christopoulos, P.; Donta, C.; Damaskos, S.; Tsiambas, E.; Tsiourvas, D.; Kalogirou, E.M.; Tosios, K.I.; Tsiklakis, K. Imaging of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds using a cone beam computed tomography device on rat calvarial defects with histological verification. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Aguiar, R.C.D.O.; Nunes, L.; Batista, E.S.; Viana, M.M.; Rodrigues, M.C.; Bueno-Silva, B.; Roscoe, M.G. Experimental composite containing silicon dioxide-coated silver nanoparticles for orthodontic bonding: Antimicrobial activity and shear bond strength. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 2022, 27, e222116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Shadlou, S.; Ahmadi-Moghadam, B.; Taheri, F. Nano-Enhanced Adhesives. Prog. Adhes. Adhes. 2015, 31, 357–396. [Google Scholar]
  110. Wang, Y.L.; Liu, Z.J. Unique Features of Nanomaterials and their Combination Support Applications in Orthodontics. Chin. J. Dent. Res. 2023, 26, 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  111. Gracco, A.; Siviero, L.; Dandrea, M.; Crivellin, G. Use of nanotechnology for the superlubrication of orthodontic wires. In Nanobiomaterials in Dentistry; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 241–267. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ravi, J.; Eshwar, A. Tissue Engineering in Orthodontics—A Review. J. Adv. Med. Dent. Sci. Res. 2020, 8, 92–97. [Google Scholar]
  113. Mundy, G.R. Regulation of bone formation by bone morphogenetic proteins and other growth factors. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1996, 324, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Komath, M.; Varma, H.K.; John, A.; Krishnan, V.; Simon, D.; Ramanathan, M.; Bhuvaneshwar, G.S. Designing Bioactive Scaffolds for Dental Tissue Engineering. In Regenerative Medicine: Laboratory to Clinic; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 423–447. [Google Scholar]
  115. Radermacher, C.; Craveiro, R.B.; Jahnen-Dechent, W.; Beier, J.; Bülow, A.; Wolf, M.; Neuss, S. Impact of compression forces on different mesenchymal stem cell types regarding orthodontic indication. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2024, 13, szae057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Derringer, K.A.; Linden, R.W.A. Vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor 2, platelet derived growth factor and transforming growth factor beta released in human dental pulp following orthodontic force. Arch. Oral Biol. 2004, 49, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Jin, H.; Jianguo, L.; Qi, S.; Mu, S.; Jiangtao, Z.; Xiaoyan, G.; Juxiang, P. Synergistic effect of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and transforming growth factor-β 1 on expression of integrin β 3 in periodontal membrane of rat orthodontic tooth. West China J. Stomatol. 2014, 32, 4. [Google Scholar]
  118. Pawinru, A.S.; Achmad, H.; Wahyuni, S.; Erwansyah, E.; Narmada, I.B.; Samad, R.; Bukhari, A.; Habar, E.H. Effect of ethanol intake on bone remodeling process during orthodontic treatment in male wistar rats. J. Dentomaxillofacial Sci. 2024, 9, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  119. Wei, F.; Yang, S.; Xu, H.; Guo, Q.; Li, Q.; Hu, L.; Liu, D.; Wang, C. Expression and function of hypoxia inducible factor-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in pulp tissue of teeth under orthodontic movement. Mediat. Inflamm. 2015, 2015, 215761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jiao, D.; Wang, J.; Yu, W.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, N.; Cao, L.; Jiang, X.; Bai, Y. Biocompatible reduced graphene oxide stimulated BMSCs induce acceleration of bone remodeling and orthodontic tooth movement through promotion on osteoclastogenesis and angiogenesis. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 15, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Krishnan, V.; Davidovitch, Z.E. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2006, 129, 469–e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Sonmez, A.B.; Castelnuovo, J. Applications of basic fibroblastic growth factor (FGF-2, bFGF) in dentistry. Dent. Traumatol. 2014, 30, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Barton, E.R.; Crowder, C. Growth factor targets for orthodontic treatments. Semin. Orthod. 2010, 16, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Altun, S. Characterization of microRNA-101,-124,-143,-145,-223 in GCF During Orthodontic Treatment. Master’s Thesis, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  125. Hamman, N.R. Modulation of RANKL and Osteoprotegerin in Adolescents Using Orthodontic Forces; The University of Tennessee Health Science Center: Memphis, TN, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  126. Dunn, M.D.; Park, C.H.; Kostenuik, J.; Kapila, S.; Giannobile, W.V. Local delivery of osteoprotegerin inhibits mechanically mediated bone modeling in orthodontic tooth movement. Bone 2007, 41, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pandey, T. The RANK/RANKL/OPG System: A Genetic Jigsaw in Bone Remodelling. J. Orofac. Health Sci. 2016, 7, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Elango, J.; Bao, B.; Wu, W. The hidden secrets of soluble RANKL in bone biology. Cytokine 2021, 144, 155559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Branch, V. Levels of Rankl and Opg in Gingival Crevicular Fluid During Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Master’s Thesis, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, India, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  130. Chandra, R.V.; Rachala, M.R.; Madhavi, K.; Kambalyal, P.; Reddy, A.A.; Ali, M.H. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: An outcome assessment. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2019, 23, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Peng, B.; Wang, L.; Han, G.; Cheng, Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: A potential cell-free therapy for orthodontic tooth stability management. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2024, 15, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Carreira, A.C.; Lojudice, F.H.; Halcsik, E.; Navarro, R.D.; Sogayar, M.C.; Granjeiro, J.M. Bone morphogenetic proteins: Facts, challenges, and future perspectives. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, T.; Yan, Z.; He, S.; Zhou, C.; Wang, H.; Yin, X.; Zou, S.; Duan, P. Intermittent parathyroid hormone improves orthodontic retention via insulin-like growth factor-1. Oral Dis. 2021, 27, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zeichner-David, M. Genetic influences on orthodontic tooth movement. Biol. Mech. Tooth Mov. 2021, 169–188. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119608912.ch12 (accessed on 17 February 2025).
  135. Yan, L.; Sun, S.; Qu, L. Insulin-like growth factor-1 promotes the proliferation and odontoblastic differentiation of human dental pulp cells under high glucose conditions. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 40, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Uzel, M.I.; Kantarci, A.; Hong, H.H.; Uygur, C.; Sheff, M.C.; Firatli, E.; Trackman, C. Connective tissue growth factor in drug-induced gingival overgrowth. J. Periodontol. 2001, 72, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kaya, F.A.; Hamamci, N.; Basaran, G.; Dogru, M.; Yildirim, T.T. TNF-α, IL-1β AND IL-8 levels in tooth early levelling movement orthodontic treatment. J. Int. Dent. Med. Res. 2010, 3, 3. [Google Scholar]
  138. Aristizábal, J.F.; Ríos, H.; Rey, D.; Álvarez, M.A.; Parra Patiño, B.; Ortiz, M. Interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β) polymorphism and orthodontics: A systematic review. Rev. Fac. Odontol. Univ. Antioq. 2019, 31, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yoshino, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Shimizu, M.; Yamada, K.; Kasai, K. TNF-α aggravates the progression of orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption in the presence of RANKL. J. Hard Tissue Biol. 2014, 23, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Suwardi, A.; Wang, F.; Xue, K.; Han, M.Y.; Teo, P.; Wang, P.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ye, E.; Li, Z.; et al. Machine learning-driven biomaterials evolution. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2102703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Shirbhate, N.R.; Bokade, S. Aids of Machine Learning for Additively Manufactured Bone Scaffold. Emerg. Technol. Healthc. Internet Things Deep Learn. Models 2021, 359–380. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119792345.ch15 (accessed on 17 February 2025).
  142. MacKay, B.S. Labelling, Modelling, and Predicting Cell Biocompatibility Using Deep Neural Networks. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  143. Khong, J.; Wang, P.; Gan, T.R.; Ng, J.; Anh, T.T.L.; Blasiak, A.; Kee, T.; Ho, D. The role of artificial intelligence in scaling nanomedicine toward broad clinical impact. In Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 385–407. [Google Scholar]
  144. Mech, D.J.; Murugappan, S.; Buddhiraju, H.S.; Eranki, A.; Rengan, A.K.; Rizvi, M.S. AI on DDS for regenerative medicine. In Artificial Intelligence in Tissue and Organ Regeneration; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 133–153. [Google Scholar]
  145. Chen, Y.W.; Stanley, K.; Att, W. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Current applications and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2020, 51, 248–257. [Google Scholar]
  146. Asiri, S.N. Can Artificial Intelligence Predict Growth and Treatment Outcomes Among Orthodontic Patients. Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  147. Elnagar, M.H.; Venugopalan, S.R.; Allareddy, V. Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics in Orthodontics. In Orthodontics-E-Book; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 176. [Google Scholar]
  148. Sharma, M.S.; Jadhav, V.; Bhuskute, K.; Reche, A. Artificial Intelligence: An Innovative Approach in Orthodontics: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2023, 17, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Gargouri, M. Artificial Intelligence and Orthodontic: Achievements, Expectations and Challenges. PhD Thesis, Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz (IUEM), Almeida, Portugal, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  150. Sun, M.L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, G.; Cui, D.; Heidari, A.A.; Jia, W.Y.; Ji, X.; Chen, H.; Luo, Y. Application of machine learning to stomatology: A comprehensive review. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 184360–184374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Khanagar, S.B.; Al-Ehaideb, A.; Vishwanathaiah, S.; Maganur, C.; Patil, S.; Naik, S.; Baeshen, H.A.; Sarode, S.S. Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making-a systematic review. J. Dent. Sci. 2021, 16, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Surendran, A.; Daigavane, P.; Shrivastav, S.; Kamble, R.; Sanchla, A.D.; Bharti, L.; Shinde, M. The Future of Orthodontics: Deep Learning Technologies. Cureus 2024, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Francisco, I.; Ribeiro, M.; Marques, F.; Travassos, R.; Nunes, C.; Pereira, F.; Caramelo, F.; Paula, A.B.; Vale, F. Application of three-dimensional digital technology in orthodontics: The state of the art. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Aljabaa, A.; McDonald, F.; Newton, J.T. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence among orthodontic patients aged 12 to 18. Angle Orthod. 2015, 85, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Z. Machine learning in orthodontics: Challenges and perspectives. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2021, 30, 1065–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wolf, D.; Farrag, G.; Flügge, T.; Timm, L.H. Predicting Outcome in Clear Aligner Treatment: A Machine Learning Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Panayi, N.C.; Efstathiou, S.; Christopoulou, I.; Kotantoula, G.; Tsolakis, I.A. Digital orthodontics: Present and future. AJO-DO Clin. Companion 2024, 4, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Caruso, S.; Caruso, S.; Pellegrino, M.; Skafi, R.; Nota, A.; Tecco, S. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic monitoring of orthodontic treatment: The dental monitoring system. Two cases. Sensors 2021, 21, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Majumdar, M.; Shivalkar, S.; Pal, A.; Verma, M.L.; Sahoo, A.K.; Roy, D.N. Nanotechnology for enhanced bioactivity of bioactive compounds. In Biotechnological Production of Bioactive Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 433–466. [Google Scholar]
  160. Soleymani, S.; Naghib, S.M. 3D and 4D printing hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regeneration. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Seifi, M.; Eskandarloo, F.; Amdjadi, P.; Farmany, A. Investigation of mechanical properties, remineralization, antibacterial effect, and cellular toxicity of composite orthodontic adhesive combined with silver-containing nanostructured bioactive glass. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gandedkar, N.H.; Dalci, O.; Darendeliler, M.A. February. Accelerated orthodontics (AO): The past, present and the future. In Seminars in Orthodontics; WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  163. Eliades, T.; Brantley, W.A. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur. J. Orthod. 2000, 22, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Squires, T.; Michelogiannakis, D.; Rossouw, E.; Javed, F. An evidence-based review of the scope and potential ethical concerns of teleorthodontics. J. Dent. Educ. 2021, 85, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. He, H.; Cao, J.; Wang, D.; Gu, B.; Guo, H.; Liu, H. Gene-modified stem cells combined with rapid prototyping techniques: A novel strategy for periodontal regeneration. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2010, 6, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Chen, F.M.; Sun, H.H.; Lu, H.; Yu, Q. Stem cell-delivery therapeutics for periodontal tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 6320–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ramezani, M.; Mohd Ripin, Z. 4D printing in biomedical engineering: Advancements, challenges, and future directions. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Xu, J.; Yang, P.; Xue, S.; Sharma, B.; Sanchez-Martin, M.; Wang, F.; Beaty, K.A.; Dehan, E.; Parikh, B. Translating cancer genomics into precision medicine with artificial intelligence: Applications, challenges and future perspectives. Hum. Genet. 2019, 138, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Jheon, A.H.; Oberoi, S.; Solem, R.C.; Kapila, S. Moving towards precision orthodontics: An evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy. Orthod. Craniofacial Res. 2017, 20, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Kazimierczak, N.; Kazimierczak, W.; Serafin, Z.; Nowicki, P.; Nożewski, J.; Janiszewska-Olszowska, J. AI in orthodontics: Revolutionizing diagnostics and treatment planning—A comprehensive review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, X.; Mu, M.; Yan, J.; Han, B.; Ye, R.; Guo, G. 3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Design, workflow and effectiveness. Regen. Biomater. 2024, 11, rbae066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ariano, A.; Posa, F.; Storlino, G.; Mori, G. Molecules inducing dental stem cells differentiation and bone regeneration: State of the art. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Shaikh, K.; Bekal, S.V.; Marei, H.F.A.; Elsayed, W.S.M.; Surdilovic, D.; Jawad, L.A. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry; Springer Nature: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. This diagram presents the intricate biological and physiological interactions and molecular pathways that facilitate the use of stem cells in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. It includes various cell types like white blood cells, red blood cells, lymphocytes, and specific markers like mesenchymal stem cells and dental pulp stem cells. Additionally, it shows how elements such as hyaluronic acid, collagen types, and various proteins and factors. Adopted from [19].
Figure 1. This diagram presents the intricate biological and physiological interactions and molecular pathways that facilitate the use of stem cells in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. It includes various cell types like white blood cells, red blood cells, lymphocytes, and specific markers like mesenchymal stem cells and dental pulp stem cells. Additionally, it shows how elements such as hyaluronic acid, collagen types, and various proteins and factors. Adopted from [19].
Oral 05 00021 g001
Figure 2. This illustration showcases the potential applications of stem cells in regenerative therapies tailored for orthognathic surgery, including treatments for cleft palate. It highlights the roles of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and includes key identifiers such as CD markers (cluster of differentiation), HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR), STRO-1 (mesenchymal precursor cell marker antibody), and hPDLSCS (human periodontal ligament stem cells). These elements are crucial in the characterization and functionality of stem cells in surgical repair and regeneration processes. Adopted from [19].
Figure 2. This illustration showcases the potential applications of stem cells in regenerative therapies tailored for orthognathic surgery, including treatments for cleft palate. It highlights the roles of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and includes key identifiers such as CD markers (cluster of differentiation), HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR), STRO-1 (mesenchymal precursor cell marker antibody), and hPDLSCS (human periodontal ligament stem cells). These elements are crucial in the characterization and functionality of stem cells in surgical repair and regeneration processes. Adopted from [19].
Oral 05 00021 g002
Figure 3. The principle of tissue engineering is built around three fundamental components: cells, signaling molecules, and biomaterials and possible applications of stem cells (alone or in conjugation with bone scaffolds) in orthodontics. Adapted from [20,21].
Figure 3. The principle of tissue engineering is built around three fundamental components: cells, signaling molecules, and biomaterials and possible applications of stem cells (alone or in conjugation with bone scaffolds) in orthodontics. Adapted from [20,21].
Oral 05 00021 g003
Table 1. Scaffold materials in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery with roles, importance, and references.
Table 1. Scaffold materials in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery with roles, importance, and references.
No.Scaffold TypeMaterial TypeRole in Orthodontics and Orthognathic SurgeryImportance in Orthodontic and Orthognathic TreatmentReferences
1Polylactic Acid (PLA)PolymerUsed for gradual tissue integration and scaffold stability in bone regeneration.Ideal for controlled resorption in guided bone regeneration in orthognathic surgery[11,74,75]
2Polyglycolic Acid (PGA)PolymerFacilitates rapid cell integration and healing in post-surgical applications.Beneficial for quick scaffold degradation in orthognathic surgery[76,77]
3Polycaprolactone (PCL)PolymerServes as a framework for long-term tissue engineering in orthognathic surgeries.Provides extended support for complex craniofacial reconstructions.[78,79]
4Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)PolymerOffers tailored degradation for scaffolds in alignment and bone defect corrections.Customizable for patient-specific needs in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.[80,81]
5Hydroxyapatite (HA)CeramicSupports bone osseointegration and density improvement in surgical areas.Essential for bone grafting and enhancing osteoconductivity in surgical repairs.[82,83]
6Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP)CeramicUsed in alveolar ridge augmentation and cleft palate repairs.Promotes bone regeneration critical for orthodontic anchor points and device stability.[84,85,86]
7Bioactive GlassCeramicEnhances bone bonding and supports soft tissue healing around implants.Useful in complex craniofacial reconstructions and as a filler in bone defects.[87,88]
8Polymer–Ceramic CompositesCompositeCombines strength and bioactivity for load-bearing applications in orthodontics.Provides durable and biocompatible options for long-term craniofacial scaffolding.[89,90]
9Fiber-Reinforced CompositesCompositeUtilized for reinforcing bone grafts and orthodontic appliances needing high strength.Offers robust mechanical support where significant bite forces are involved.[91,92]
10AlginateNaturalUsed for impression making and as a carrier for bioactive molecules.Important for creating precise dental molds and delivering therapeutic agents.[93,94]
11ChitosanNaturalFacilitates hemostasis and has antimicrobial properties for wound healing.Supports post-surgical recovery and is used in drug delivery systems in orthodontics.[95,96,97]
12Titanium MeshMetalProvides rigid support for bone grafts in extensive reconstructive surgery.Used for structural support in segmental osteotomies and large defect bridging.[98,99]
13Silver Nanoparticles (Ag NPs)Metal NanoparticleUsed in coatings on brackets and archwires to prevent microbial colonization and reduce dental plaque.Provides broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties essential for reducing the risk of infection and improving oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment.[100,101,102]
14Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO NPs)Metal Oxide NanoparticleIncorporated into dental cements and adhesives to enhance antimicrobial properties against oral pathogens.Helps in preventing decay and infection at critical application sites, improving the longevity and success of orthodontic treatments.[103,104]
15Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs)Metal Oxide NanoparticleUtilized in composite materials for fixed appliances to improve antimicrobial activity and mechanical properties.Enhances the durability and infection resistance of orthodontic appliances under varied oral conditions, beneficial for long-term treatment stability.[64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]
16Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (nHAP)Ceramic NanoparticleApplied in surface treatments of implants to enhance bone integration and regeneration.Supports rapid osseointegration due to its similarity to natural bone mineral components, crucial for the stability of orthodontic implants.[106,107]
17Silica Nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs)Ceramic NanoparticleUsed to improve the physical properties of orthodontic acrylics and composites, making devices more durable and effective.Enhances the mechanical strength and clarity of orthodontic appliances, important for maintaining appliance integrity and aesthetics during treatment.[108,109]
18Carbon NanotubesCarbon-based NanoparticleReinforces orthodontic polymers to increase durability and reduce the risk of fractures in orthodontic appliances.Provides structural integrity to polymers, significantly enhancing their mechanical properties and resistance to the mechanical forces during orthodontic treatment.[110,111]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farjaminejad, R.; Farjaminejad, S.; Hasani, M.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Sayahpour, B.; Marya, A.; Jamilian, A. The Role of Tissue Engineering in Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment: A Narrative Review. Oral 2025, 5, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5010021

AMA Style

Farjaminejad R, Farjaminejad S, Hasani M, Garcia-Godoy F, Sayahpour B, Marya A, Jamilian A. The Role of Tissue Engineering in Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment: A Narrative Review. Oral. 2025; 5(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farjaminejad, Rosana, Samira Farjaminejad, Melika Hasani, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Babak Sayahpour, Anand Marya, and Abdolreza Jamilian. 2025. "The Role of Tissue Engineering in Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment: A Narrative Review" Oral 5, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5010021

APA Style

Farjaminejad, R., Farjaminejad, S., Hasani, M., Garcia-Godoy, F., Sayahpour, B., Marya, A., & Jamilian, A. (2025). The Role of Tissue Engineering in Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment: A Narrative Review. Oral, 5(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5010021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop