Next Article in Journal
Morphological and Molecular Analysis Describing Two New Species of Myxobolus (Cnidaria, Myxosporea) in Mugil curema (Mugilidae) from Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Curvature Analysis in Seed Surface of SEM Images of Silene Species from Türkiye
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diatom Flora from Time-Series Sediment Trap in the Kuroshio Extension Region of the Northwestern Pacific

1
Library of Marine Samples, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Geoje 53201, Republic of Korea
2
Tropical & Subtropical Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Jeju 63349, Republic of Korea
3
Marine Biotechnology & Bioresource Research Department, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Taxonomy 2024, 4(3), 507-547; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4030025
Submission received: 3 June 2024 / Revised: 27 June 2024 / Accepted: 2 July 2024 / Published: 29 July 2024

Abstract

:
Precise identification of diatom species is fundamental to correctly interpreting their roles in the marine ecosystems; the documentation of species records with illustrations is therefore essential to guarantee ecological works and the continuous use of compositional data in future works. We document the diatom flora in the Kuroshio Extension (KE) area of the northwestern Pacific. Samples were collected by sediment trap deployment from November 2017 to August 2018 and identified using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Eighty-two taxa belonging to 17 families and 38 genera were documented with representative references, morphological dimensions, brief diagnosis, distribution, and short taxonomic comments. All of the taxa were divided into three distribution patterns (cold, warm, and eurythermal taxa) based on the previous distribution records; each group may be transported by the Oyashio and Kuroshio Currents, respectively. The mixed occurrence of cold- and warm-water species indicates that the KE area is a crossroads for them. A preliminary checklist was compiled from previous studies, incorporating our records, and 206 diatom taxa occurred in the northeastern path of the Kuroshio Current. The diatom flora in the KE area will be used to understand the hydrology of the Kuroshio Current in future work.

1. Introduction

Diatoms play a crucial role in the ocean as the main primary producers and transporters of particulate organic matter into the ocean’s interior. Although diatoms are not abundant in the oligotrophic oceans of the subtropical gyre [1,2,3], they might be more important for new production and the export of particulate carbon than previously thought in oligotrophic oceans [4,5]. In particular, episodic nutrient input into oligotrophic regions leads to rapid diatom growth and a coupled export flux [4,6]. There are many time-series sediment trap studies, most of which have focused on geochemical and gross uptake and export studies for carbon or silica cycles (e.g., [7]). Before understanding the dynamics of phytoplankton communities under environmental stress, documentation of the flora is essential for properly understanding changes in a dynamic marine environment. Morphological works should steadily provide information despite being time-consuming and requiring effort. Despite the large number of sediment trap studies associated with phytoplankton ecology, the use of data derived from sediment traps needs more support (e.g., [8]). In addition, studies on the flora of diatoms from sediment traps have received little attention, despite their importance for the insurance of species identification and evaluation of diatom assemblage structures between regions [9].
The Kuroshio Extension (KE) is a boundary area between the northward warm Kuroshio Current and the southward cold Oyashio Current, and the marine environment is relatively unstable due to complex hydrodynamic processes such as large-scale recirculation and mesoscale eddies (e.g., [10]). The phytoplankton composition in this area reflected its instability, showing changes in community composition in space and time (e.g., [11]). Several studies regard KE-adjacent regions as a “hotspot” of primary production with significant carbon sinks [12,13]. A time-series sediment trap was deployed in the KE region between November 2017 and August 2018 to understand the flux and sinking particles from the KE region [14], and the components (in particular, the diatoms) of the sinking flux were analyzed. In order to guarantee the diatom flux data quality, we provide the diatom flora that comprise the trap samples with illustrations and a brief description of the species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Processing of the Sediment Trap

A time-series sediment trap (PARFLUX Mark 78H-21, McLane, Falmouth, MA, USA) was deployed at station KE08 (Figure 1, 33°41.8′ N, 156°39.7′ E) at a depth of 800 m from November 2017 to August 2018. A recording current meter (SeaGuard RCM DW, Aanderaa, Bergen, Norway) for the measurement of current speed and direction was deployed at an 835 m water depth (35 m below the sediment trap). A total of 20 bottles were collected over 10 months, but the 16th bottle was lost. Sinking particles were collected at 10-day intervals from February to June 2018 and monthly during the remaining time. Detailed sample intervals and information were presented by Kim et al. [14]. Sample bottles were filled with filtered seawater collected from the trap deployment depth at the same site. Sodium-borate-buffered, 5% formalin solution was added as a preservative. Upon recovery, samples were stored in a refrigerator at 2–4 °C.

2.2. Diatom Analysis

The original samples were rinsed with preservatives and seawater, and the organic materials in the sample pellets were removed following Hasle and Fryxell [15]. In brief, equal amounts of saturated potassium permanganate and 33% hydrochloric acid were added and boiled at 80 °C until the color was cleared. The cleaned samples were rinsed until free of acid. Preparation of slides for qualitative and quantitative analyses involved the settling of the acid-cleaned material onto cover slips by a random settling method [16]. The cover slips were affixed with a Pleurax (Mountmedia, Wako, Japan). The permanent slides were used for qualitative analysis of diatom under a ×1000 objective using a light microscope (BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a digital camera (EOS 50D; Cannon, Seoul, Korea). For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examinations, some cleaned materials were filtered through a 0.2 polycarbonate membrane and dried in the air. The filtrates were attached to aluminum stubs and coated by 10 nm gold–palladium. The prepared stubs were observed in FE-SEM (JSM7600F, Jeol, Japan). For the identification of the species, we referred to various studies, including ones on the quantitative and qualitative morphological characteristics and distributions of the species. The references are provided in each species section with description pages and figure numbers.

3. Results

A total of 82 diatom taxa were observed in trap samples (Table 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12). The references for species identification, brief diagnostics, micrographs, and dimensions for all diatoms are presented. Higher classification ranking into subclasses follows Mann in Adl et al. [17], and the order levels followed Algaebase [18].
  • Subphylum Coscinodiscophytina Medlin & Kaczmarska, 2004
  • Class Coscinodiscophyceae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Subclass Coscinodiscophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Asterolamprales Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Family Asterolampraceae H.L. Smith, 1872
  • Genus Asteromphalus Ehrenberg, 1844
  • Asteromphalus flabellatus (Brébisson) Greville, 1859 [Figure 2a (LM)]
Basionym: Spatangidium flabellatum Brébisson, 1857.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 135, pl. 24.
Sample: 2017-KE-02.
Dimensions: Valves 35.7 μm in diameter; twelve areolae in 10 μm, seven hyaline rays.
Diagnostic: Valve pear-shaped; central area slightly eccentric; separating lines straight; hyaline ray slightly tapered toward the valve margin.
Distribution: Asteromphalus flabellatus is distributed in a warm-water region [19,20]. In the Pacific Ocean, this species was reported from the central Indo-Pacific to the temperate northern Pacific along the Kuroshio Current: Thailand [21], Indonesia [22], the Philippines, and Yokohama [23]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Asteromphalus heptactis (Brébisson) Ralfs in Pritchard, 1861 [Figure 11a (SEM)]
Basionym: Spatangidium heptactis Brébisson, 1857.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 137, pl. 24; Tiffany and Hernández-Becerril [24], p. 254, pl. 2, Fig 2; pl. 15, Figs 1–4; pl. 16, Figs 1–4; pl. 17, Figs 1–6; pl. 18, Figs 1–6; pl. 19, Figs 1–6.
Sample: 2017-KE-18.
Dimensions: Valves 30.8–44.0 μm in diameter; seven areolae in 10 μm, seven hyaline rays.
Diagnostic: Valve circular; central area slightly eccentric; number of areolae between two rays is two to three, except for short rays.
Distribution: Asteromphalus heptactis is distributed in a temperate region [19]; this species was also reported from cold-water regions such as the Southern Ocean [25] and Scotch Cap, Alaska [26]. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Genus Spatangidium Brébisson, 1857
  • Spatangidium arachne Brébisson, 1857 [Figure 2b (LM)]
Synonym: Asteromphalus arachne (Brébisson) Ralfs in Pritchard, 1861.
References: Hernández-Becerril [27], p. 279, Figs 1–14; Tiffany and Hernández-Becerril [24], p. 256, pl. 26, Figs 1–7, pl. 27, Figs 1–6.
Dimensions: Valves 45 μm in diameter; seven to eight areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Valves oval; central area eccentric and very small; five hyaline rays are narrow, almost straight, except for two short rays that are slightly curved; separating lines are straight; number of areolae between two rays is two to three, except for short rays; three rimoportulae are present near the distal ends of the aborted ray in the central area.
Distribution: Spatangidium arachne has been widely reported from tropical to subtropical regions [24]: off the coasts of Baja California; the Gulf of California; the Indian Ocean; Australian waters [27]; and San Diego Bay [24]. Based on the tropical distribution, this species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
Remarks: Spatangidium arachne was transferred to the genus Asteromphalus by Ralfs [28]. However, Hernández-Becerril [27] reinstated it to Spatangidium by the presence of one to three rimoportulae near the central area, and the cribra structure that was distinct to Asteromphalus.
  • Order Coscinodiscales Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Family Coscinodiscaceae Kützing, 1844
  • Genus Coscinodiscopsis E.A. Sar & I. Sunesen, 2008
  • Coscinodiscopsis jonesiana (Greville) E.A. Sar & I. Sunesen, 2008 [Figure 2c,d (LM)]
Basionym: Eupodiscus jonesianus Greville, 1862.
Synonyms: Coscinodiscus jonesianus (Greville) Ostenfeld, 1915.
References: Sar et al. [29], p. 419, Figs 1–12.
Dimensions: Valves 55.3–100.4 μm in diameter; areolae in 10 μm, five to seven in center and nine to eleven in margin.
Diagnostic: Valves convex, flat in the center with gently curved margins; areolae fasciculate and form spiral decussate arcs.
Distribution: Coscinodiscopsis jonesiana is distributed in warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Coscinodiscus Ehrenberg, 1839
  • Coscinodiscus argus Ehrenberg, 1839 [Figure 2e (LM)]
References: Hasle and Sims [30], p. 308, Figs 1–7, 33, 34; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 103, pl. 15.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valve 58 μm in diameter; areolae in 10 μm, four in center and five in margin.
Diagnostic: Valves flat with rounded margin and steep, high valve mantle; areolae increase from the valve center to the middle of the radius, and then decrease in the margin.
Distribution: Coscinodiscus argus was first reported as a fossil from Caltanisetta, Sicily, and Oran, Algeria, and as a living organism from Cuxhaven, North Sea (Ehrenberg [31]). This species has mainly been reported in fossilized materials (e.g., [31,32]). Hasle and Syvertsen [19] mentioned that this species is widely distributed. Therefore, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of C. argus in the KE region.
  • Coscinodiscus centralis Ehrenberg, 1839 [Figure 2f (LM)]
References: Hasle and Lange [33], p. 45, Figs 15–30; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 102.
Dimensions: Valves 180.1 μm in diameter; six areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Valves convex, flat in the center; central rosette distinct and consists of larger-sized central areolae that have visible cribra in LM; areolae decrease in size outward.
Distribution: Although C. centralis is widely distributed in the world [19], this species has been reported in warm-water regions: the Philippines [34] and Tanzania [35]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Coscinodiscus gigas Ehrenberg, 1841 [Figure 2j (LM)]
References: Schmidt [36], pl. 64, Fig 1; Takano [37], p. 134, pl. 1, Figs 1–8, pl. 2, Figs 9–16.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valve 191.6 μm in diameter; two areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Valves flat; central rosette absent; areolae adjacent to center, elongated in radial direction and increasing in size outward.
Distribution: Coscinodiscus gigas has been reported from warm water regions in the Pacific Ocean: Malaysia [38], Thailand [21], Nicobar Islands of India [36], and Tokyo Bay of Japan [37]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Coscinodiscus cf. marginatus Ehrenberg, 1843 [Figure 2g,h (LM)]
References: Sancetta [39], p. 240, pl. 1, Figs 1–13; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 107, pl. 18; Nikolaev et al. [40] p. 17, pl. 16, Figs 1–6.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valves 21.5–21.7 μm in diameter; areolae in 10 μm, four to five in center and six in margin.
Diagnostic: Valves heavily silicified; areolae coarse.
Distribution: Coscinodiscus marginatus is widely distributed in the world [19]. Due to its wide occurrence along the boundary of the northwestern Pacific Ocean, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of C. cf. marginatus in the KE region.
Comments: The valve size of C. marginatus has a range of 30 to 200 μm [19], but the materials from the KE were smaller than those in other reports.
  • Coscinodiscus radiatus Ehrenberg, 1840 [Figure 2i (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 107, Figs 6d,e, pl. 18; Sar et al. [41], p. 517, Figs 33–50.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-09; 2017_KE-8-18.
Dimensions: Valves 38.8–53.3 μm in diameter; areolae in 10 μm, four to five in center and five to six in margin.
Diagnostic: Valves flat; areolae coarse.
Distribution: Coscinodiscus radiatus is widely distributed in the world [19], from tropical waters such as Thailand [21,42] and the Philippines [34] to cold waters [43]. Due to its wide occurrence along the boundary of the northwestern Pacific Ocean, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of C. radiatus in the KE region.
  • Family Heliopeltaceae H.L. Smith, 1872
  • Genus Actinoptychus Ehrenberg, 1843
  • Actinoptychus senarius (Ehrenberg) Ehrenberg, 1843 [Figure 2l,m (LM)]
References: Lee and Chang [44], p. 367, Figs 7–9, 12; Siqueiros-Beltrones and Argumedo-Hernández [45], Fig 19; Siqueiros-Beltrones et al. [46], Fig. 24; Uematsu et al. [47], Fig 3; López-Fuerte et al. [48], p. 7, Figs 4a–j.
Dimensions: Valves 39.8 μm in diameter.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Distribution: In the North Pacific Ocean, A. senarius was reported from warm temperate regions: Jinhae Bay of South Korea [44], Tokyo Bay of Japan [47], and the west coast of Mexico [45,46,48]. The occurrence of A. senarius was found in the KE region, and it was transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Family Hemidiscaceae Hendey ex Hasle, 1996
  • Genus Actinocyclus Ehrenberg, 1837
  • Actinocyclus curvatulus Janisch, 1878 [Figure 3c (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 121, pl. 19.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valves 22.8 μm in diameter; nine areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolae row curved.
Distribution: Actinocyclus curvatulus is a cosmopolitan species, but is common to the Arctic Ocean [19]. The occurrence of A. curvatulus has been found in the KE region; it was transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Actinocyclus octonarius Ehrenberg, 1837 [Figure 3a (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 120.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valves 52.9 μm in diameter; ten areolae in 10 μm.
Distribution: Actinocyclus octonarius is a cosmopolitan species [19]. Due to its wide occurrence along the boundary of the northwestern Pacific Ocean, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of A. octonarius in the KE region.
  • Actinocyclus ochotensis Jousé, 1968 [Figure 3b (LM)]
References: Koizumi [49], p. 831, pl. 2, Figs 3–7.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valves 37.9 μm in diameter; eight areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Valve center with a hyaline area without areolae; areolae sparse in the valve center and packed toward the margin; areolation fasciculate; pseudonodule distinct in the valve mantle.
Distribution: Actinocyclus ochotensis was first described in sediment from the Okhotsk Sea [50]; since then, there have been additional records from sediments around this Sea [49,51]. The occurrence of A. ochotensis has been found in the KE region; it was transported along the Oyashio Current.
Synonyms: Thalassiosira variabilis Makarova, 1959; Actinocyclus variabilis (Makarova) Makarova, 1985.
References: Makarova [52], p. 85, Figs 7–11; Gogorev and Pushina [53].
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-09; 2017_KE-8-18.
Dimensions: Valves 12.3–24.5 μm in diameter; eight to twelve areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areola row eccentric; a single isolated areola in the center; pseudonodule uncertain in LM.
Distribution: Actinocyclus iraidae was regarded as a brackish to euryhaline and eurythermal neritic [54]. Since the original description, there have been no additional records from other regions. Due to the lack of additional records along the boundary of the northwestern Pacific Ocean, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of A. iraidae in the KE region.
Comments: Makarova [52] first described this species in the Caspian Sea as Thalassiosira variablis, and she changed it to Actinocycylus by means of SEM examination of the same material [54]. Subsequently, Gogorev and Pushina [53] recognized that A variabilis (Makarova) Makarova is a homonym of A. variabilis Corda, so they renamed it A. iraidae.
  • Genus Azpeitia M. Peragallo, 1912
  • Azpeitia neocrenulata (VanLandingham) Fryxell & Watkins, 1986 [Figure 3f,g (LM)]
References: Fryxell et al. [55], p. 18, Figs 16.1–16.3D, Fig 30.2; Garcia and Odebrecht [56], p. 422, Figs 24–26.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valves 19–44.7 μm in diameter; six to ten areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolae rows fasciculate with marginal rimoportula and a depression at the end of each fascicle.
Distribution: Fryxell et al., [55] mentioned that A. neocrenulata has been found in the Gulf of Mexico, the central Pacific, and the Indian Ocean as well as in the Gulf Stream Warm Core Ring of the North Atlantic as a warm-water species; Garcia and Odebrecht [56] observed it in Brazilian water. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Azpeitia nodulifera (Schmidt) Fryxell & P.A. Sims [Figure 3h,i (LM)]
References: Fryxell, Sims and Watkins [55], p. 19, Figs 17, 18.1–18.5, 30.3, 30.4; Garcia and Odebrecht [56], p. 422, Figs 22, 23, 31–33.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: Valve 27 μm in diameter; seven areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Large rimoportula close to valve center.
Distribution: Fryxell, Sims and Watkins [55] mentioned that A. nodulifera has been found in the central Pacific, Gulf of Mexico, and the northwest Atlantic Ocean in Gulf Stream warm core rings; Garcia and Odebrecht [56] observed it in Brazilian water. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Roperia Grunow ex Pelletan, 1889
  • Roperia tesselata (Roper) Grunow ex Pelletan, 1889 [Figure 3j,k (LM)]
Basionym: Eupodiscus tesselatus Roper, 1858.
References: Lee and Lee [57], p. 327, Figs 1–19.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valve 23–63.9 µm in diameter; four to eight areolae in 10 µm.
Distribution: Hasle [58] regarded Roperia tesselata as a warm-water species. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
Comments: Valves variable from circular to tear-drop form [57].
  • Order Stellarimales Nikolaev & Harwood in Witkowski & Siemińska, 2000
  • Family Stellarimaceae Nikolaev ex P.A. Sims & Hasle, 1990
  • Genus Stellarima Hasle & P.A. Sims, 1986
  • Stellarima stellaris (Roper) Hasle & P.A. Sims, 1986 [Figure 2k (LM)]
Basionym: Coscinodiscus stellaris Roper, 1858.
Synonym: Symbolophora stellaris (Roper) Nikolaev, 1983.
References: Hasle et al. [59], p. 198, Figs 26–28.
Dimensions: Valves 73.3 μm in diameter; eleven areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Valves extremely convex; areolation arranged in wide sectors; central area is filled with areolae; number of rimoportula is three to four.
Distribution: Hasle and Syvertsen [19] regarded this species as a warm-water to temperate planktonic species. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
Comments: Stellarima stellaris is distinguished from S. microtrias by the smaller areolae, wider sectors, a narrow hyaline margin, and a valve center almost filled by areolae [59].
  • Subphylum Probosciophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al., 2019
  • Order Probosciales Medlin, 2021
  • Family Probosciaceae R.W. Jordan & Ligowski, 2004
  • Genus Proboscia B.G. Sundström, 1986
  • Proboscia indica (H. Peragallo) Hernández-Becerril, 1995 [Figure 4a (LM)]
References: Hernández-Becerril [60], p. 254, Figs 5, 6; Yun and Lee [61], p. 304, Figs 2A–F; Boonprakob et al. [62], p. 170, Figs 189–198.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Distribution: Proboscia indica is distributed in temperate to tropical waters [60]. In the North Pacific Ocean, this species was reported in Thailand [62] and South Korea [61]. Based on the warm-water occurrence of this species, it may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Subphylum Rhizosoleniophytina D.G. Mann in Adl et al., 2019
  • Subclass Rhizosoleniophycidae Round & Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Rhizosoleniales P.C. Silva, 1962
  • Family Rhizosoleniaceae De Toni, 1890
  • Genus Pseudosolenia B.G, Sundström, 1986
  • Pseudosolenia calcar-avis (Schultze) B.G. Sundström, 1986 [Figure 4b (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 160, pl. 30; Yun and Lee [61], p. 307, Figs 4A–H.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-04.
Distribution: Pseudosolenia calcar-avis is a warm-water species [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Rhizosolenia Brightwell, 1858
  • Rhizosolenia bergonii H. Peragallo, 1892 [Figure 4c–e (LM)]
References: Teanpisut and Patarajinda [21], Figs 2–17; Yun and Lee [63], p. 176, Figure 2A–G; Boonprakob et al. [62], p. 153, Figs 18–34.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-09.
Distribution: Rhizosolenia bergonii is distributed in warm-water regions [19]: Thailand [21,62], Japan [64], and South Korea [63]. Based on the warm water of occurrence of this species, it may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Rhizosolenia hebetata f. semispina (Hensen) Gran, 1908 [Figure 4f,g (LM)]
References: Sundström [65], p. 48, Figs 19, 117; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 149.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01, 2017_KE-8-05.
Distribution: Rhizosolenia hebetata f. semispina is distributed in northern cold-water regions [19,65]. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Rhizosolenia imbricata Brightwell 1858 [Figure 4h (LM)]
References: Sundström [65], p. 80, Figs 200–208, Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 155.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-04.
Distribution: Rhizosolenia imbricata is distributed worldwide, except in polar regions [19,65]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Rhizosolenia styliformis Brightwell, 1858 [Figure 4i (LM)]
References: Cleve [22], p. 11, Ostenfeld [42], p. 13; Sundström [65], p. 15, Figs 5, 47–56; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 146; Boonprakob et al. [62], p. 151, Figs 3–8.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: 14 µm in diameter.
Distribution: Rhizosolenia styliformis is distributed in the northern part of the Atlantic [19,65], but has also been found in tropical waters such as the Gulf of Siam in Thailand [42,62] and the Java Sea [22]. Due to its occurrence in a wide range of temperatures, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of C. radiatus in the KE region.
  • Genus Sundstroemia Medlin, Boonprakob, Lundholm & Moestrup, 2021
  • Sundstroemia pungens (Cleve-Euler) Medlin, Lundholm, Boonprakob & Moestrup, [Figure 4j (LM)]
References: Yun et al. [66], p. 142, Figs 1A–F; Boonprakob, Lundholm, Medlin and Moestrup [62], p. 162, Figs 106–118 (as Rhizosolenia aff. pungens).
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Distribution: Sundstroemia pungens has been found in warm to temperate regions: Thailand [62] and the East China Sea of South Korea [66]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Subphylum Bacillariophytina Medlin & Kaczmarska, 2004
  • Class Mediophyceae Medlin & Kaczmarska, 2004
  • Subclass Thalassiosirophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Thalassiosirales Glezer & Makarova, 1986
  • Family Lauderiaceae (Schütt) Lemmermann, 1899
  • Genus Lauderia Cleve, 1873
  • Lauderia annulata Cleve, 1873 [Figure 5a (LM)]
References: Hasle [67], p. 3, Figs 1–3; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 36.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-09.
Dimensions: Valves 58.6 μm in diameter.
Diagnostic: Valve face with faint radial ribs; central annulus distinct; numerous fultoportulae scattered on valve face and margin.
Distribution: Lauderia annulata is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Family Thalassiosiraceae Lebour, 1930
  • Genus Detonula F.Schütt ex De Toni, 1894
  • Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran, 1900 [Figure 5b,c (LM)]
Basionym: Lauderia confervacea Cleve, 1896.
Synonym: Detonula cystifera Gran, 1900.
References: Hasle [67], p. 15, Figs 44–68; Syvertsen [68], p. 55, Figs 63–69; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 36.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-05.
Dimensions: Valves 18.5–21.1 μm in diameter.
Diagnostic: Valve face with faint radial ribs; single central fultoportula; one ring of marginal fultoportulae with distinct external tube.
Distribution: Detonula confervacea is distributed in northern cold to northern temperate regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Genus Minidiscus Hasle 1973
  • Minidiscus trioculatus (F.J.R. Taylor) Hasle 1973 [Figure 11c (SEM)]
Basionym: Coscinodiscus trioculatus F.J.R. Taylor 1966.
References: Hasle [67], p. 29, Figs 101–108; Kaczmarska et al. [69], p. 464, Figs 7–10.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-06.
Dimensions: Valves 4.1–5.4 μm in diameter; 37–45 areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Prominent hyaline in valve margin; hexagonal areolae; three to four valve face fultoportulae; rimoportulae on valve face.
Distribution: Minidiscus trioculatus is a cosmopolitan species [67,69]. Due to its occurrence in a wide range of temperatures, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of M. troiculatus in the KE region.
  • Genus Planktoniella F.Schütt, 1892
  • Planktoniella blanda (A. Schmidt) Syvertsen & Hasle, 1993 [Figure 5d (LM)]
Basionym: Coscinodiscus blandus A. Schmidt, 1878.
Synonyms: Coscinodiscus bipartitus Rattray, 1890; Coscinodiscus latimarginatus Guo, 1981; Thalassiosira blandus (A. Schmidt) Desikachary & Gowthaman in Desikachary, 1989; Thalassiosira bipartita (Rattray) Hallegraeff, 1992.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [70], p. 304, Figs 19–31; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 40.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: Valves 34 μm in diameter; five to seven areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Prominent hexagonal areolae arranged in linear formation. Marginal ribs distinct. Single central fultoportulae close to central areola.
Distribution: Planktoniella blanda is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Planktoniella sol (G.C.Wallich) Schütt, 1892 [Figure 5e (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [70], p. 303, Figs 17–31; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 39.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valves 33.5 μm in diameter; six to eight areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolae arranged in eccentric pattern. Marginal ribs distinct. Single central fultoportula close to central areola. Two rimoportulae in the valve margin.
Distribution: Planktoniella sol is distributed in warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Shionodiscus A.J. Alverson, S.H. Kang & E.C. Theriot, 2006
  • Shionodiscus oestrupii var. oestrupii (Ostenfeld) A.J. Alverson, S.H. Kang & E.C. Theriot, 2006 [Figure 5f–j (LM)]
Basionym: Cosinosira oestrupii Ostenfeld, 1900.
Synonym: Thalassiosira oestrupii (Ostenfeld) Proshkina-Lavrenko ex Hasle, 1960.
References: Fryxell and Hasle [71], p. 805, Figs 1–10; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 83 (as Thalassiosira oestrupii).
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-05; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valves 14.1–20.5 μm in diameter; five to seven areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolae larger in valve center than marginal one. Marginal fultoportula dense.
Distribution: Shionodiscus oestrupii is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Shionodiscus cf. oestrupii var. venrickae (Fryxell & Hasle) A.J. Alverson, S.H. Kang & E.C. Theriot, 2006 [Figure 5k (LM)]
References: Lee and Yoo [72], p. 190, pl. 4, Figs 1–5; Hernández-Becerril and Peña [73], p. 550, Figs 42, 43; Aké-Castillo et al. [74], p. 495, Fig 21; Naya [75], p. 157, Figs 25–26, 65–68.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-05; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valves 15.7–54.3 μm in diameter; six to ten areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation distinct and eccentric.
Distribution: Shionodiscus oestrupii var. venrickae is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions of the Pacific Ocean: Gulf of California [73]; Gulf of Tehuantepec of Mexico [74]; Yellow Sea of South Korea [72]; and central Kanto Plain of Japan [75]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
Comments: The Shionodiscus ostrupii complex is characterized by the single central fultoportula and valve face rimoportula away from the central fultoportula by two to three areolae. The KE specimen differs in valve size from S. oestrupii var. venrickae, which has 5.5–39 μm valves [71].
  • Shionodiscus trifultus (Fryxell) A.J. Alverson, S.H. Kang & E.C. Theriot, 2006 [Figure 11d (SEM)]
Basionym: Thalassiosira trifulata Fryxell, 1979.
References: Fryxell and Hasle [76], p. 16, Figs 1–24; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 87, pl. 12 (as Thalassiosira trifulta).
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-05; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valves 19.9 μm in diameter; five to seven areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation eccentric; rimoportula close to valve margin; fultoportula with internally trifultate structure; one to three fultoportulae in valve center.
Distribution: Shionodiscus trifultus is distributed in temperate to cold-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Shionodiscus variantus (Shiono) A.J. Alverson, S.H. Kang & E.C. Theriot, 2006 [Figure 11e,f (SEM)]
Basioinym: Thalassiosira variantia Shiono, 2001.
References: Shiono [77], p. 86, Figs 13–24.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-09; 2017_KE-8-18; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valves 25.1–30.0 μm in diameter; seven to eight areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation eccentric; rimoportula close to central fultoportula; fultoportula with internally operculate structure, larger in valve center than marginal one; marginal fultoportula dense.
Distribution: Shionodiscus variantus was originally described in the late Pliocene sediments of the Northwest Pacific Ocean [77]. Although there are no reports on S. variantus from other regions since this species was originally found in a fossil deposit, it seems to be overlooked. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Shionodiscus aff. poroirregulatus (Hasle & Heimdal) A.J. Alverson, S.H. Kang & E.C. Theriot, 2006 [Figure 5l (LM)]
Basionym: Thalassiosira poroirregulata Hasle & Heimdal, 1970.
References: Rivera [78], p. 113, pl. 51, Figs 317–322, pl. 52, Figs 323–328, pl. 53, Figs 329–334, pl. 54, Figs 335–339; Lee and Park [79], p. 554, Figs 28–29.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-09; 2017_KE-8-20.
Dimensions: Valves 18.3–41.3 μm in diameter; five to eight areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areola arranged eccentrically; central and subcentral fultoportulae variable.
Comments: The distinguishing characteristics of Shionodiscus poroirregulatus are irregular subcentral fultoportulae and fasciculate areolation [19]. The KE specimens also have an irregular number of subcentral fultoportulae, but they differ in eccentric areolation and coarse areolae. Since S. poroirregulatus was originally described in Chilean waters, this species has mainly been reported from the southern hemisphere, including the Antarctic to the Subantarctic Ocean [80]. Although Lee and Park [79] reported S. poroirregulatus in South Korean waters, it also has coarser areolae than the Chilean S. poroirregulatus. The taxonomic status of Shionodiscus aff. proroirregulatus in the northern hemisphere needs additional research.
  • Genus Takanoa I.V. Makarova, 1994
  • Takanoa bingensis (Takano) I.V. Makarova, 1994 [Figure 5m (LM)]
Basionym: Thalassiosira bingensis Takano, 1980.
References: Takano [81], p. 42, Figs 1–34; Makarova [82], p. 105.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valves 56.2 μm in diameter; areolae invisible in LM.
Diagnostic: Valves weak; areolae invisible in LM; marginal fultoportulae dense.
Distribution: Takanoa bingensis was first observed in the coastal waters of Japan (Takano 1980). Since then, there has been no record of it in other regions. Due to the lack of additional occurrence of this species, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of T. bingensis in the KE.
Comments: Makarova [82] separated this species from the genus Thalassiosira by consideration of its characteristics such as the two rings of the marginal and mantle fultoportulae, two rimoportulae surrounded by small arcs formed by fultoportulae, and an unusual cingulum.
  • Genus Thalassiosira Cleve, 1873
  • Thalassiosira anguste-lineata (A. Schmidt) Fryxell & Hasle, 1977 [Figure 11g,h (SEM)]
Basionym: Coscinodiscus anguste-lineata A. Schmidt, 1878.
Synyonms: Coscinodiscus polychordus Gran 1897; Coscinodiscus lineata f. polychordus (Gran) H. Peragallo & M. Peragallo, 1908; Coscinodiscus lineatus var. polychorda (Gran) F.W. Mills, 1933; Coscinosira polychorda (Gran), 1900; Thalassiosira polychorda (Gran) E. Jørgensen, 1899.
References: Fryxell and Hasle [83], p. 73, pl. 4, 5, Figs 22–26, 27–34; Hasle and Syvertsen 1996, p. 71, pl. 9; Park et al. [84], p. 49, Fig 6.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-18.
Dimensions: Valves 40.4 μm in diameter; areolae invisible in LM.
Diagnostic: Central fultoportula absent; modified ring of five to seven fultoportulae equidistant from the valve center.
Distribution: Thalassiosira anguste-lineata is a cosmopolitan species [19]. Park et al. [84] mentioned that this species is distributed in cold to tropical waters. Due to its occurrence in a wide range of temperatures, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of T. anguste-lineata in the KE region.
References: Hasle [85], p. 113, Figs 25–45; Miyahara et al. [86], Figs 2A–D; Li et al. [87], p. 91, Figs 36–42; Park et al. [84], p. 408, Fig 12.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-09.
Dimensions: Valve 13.4–14.8 μm in diameter.
Diagnostic: Valves flat to convex with curved mantle; areolae invisible in LM; two rings of marginal fultoportulae; a single rimoportula located between two marginal fultoportulae.
Distribution: Thalassiosira diporocyclus is distributed in temperate to tropical regions [19]. In the Pacific Ocean, T. diporocyclus was found in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean waters [84,86,87]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassiosira ferelineata Hasle & Fryxell, 1977 [Figure 5p,q (LM)]
References: Hasle and Fryxell [88], p. 26, Figs 46–53; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p 59.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-05.
Dimensions: Valve 26.8 μm in diameter; seven areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation linear; a single central fultoportula close to the central areola.
Distribution: Thalassiosira ferelineata is distributed in warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
Comments: Thalassiosira ferelineata can be confused with T. tenera due to the linear areolation, but they are different regarding the position of the central fultoportula. The former has a central fultoportula close to the central areolae between areolae, but in the latter, the central fultoportula replaces the central areola.
  • Thalassiosira lineata Jousé, 1968 [Figure 5r–t (LM)]
References: Hasle and Fryxell [88], p. 22, Figs. 15–25; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p 80; Park et al. [84], p. 411, Fig 19.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-05; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-09.
Dimensions: Valves 17.4–43.9 in diameter, nine to fifteen areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation linear; valve face has scattered fultoportulae prominent in LM.
Distribution: Thalassiosira lineata is distributed in warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassiosira mendiolana Hasle & Heimdal, 1970 [Figure 11j (SEM)]
References: Hasle and Heimdal [89], p. 570, Figs 44–53, 73 and 74; Fryxell and Hasle [90], Figs 22–32; Park et al. [84], p. 413, Fig 24.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-05
Dimensions: Valves 16.6 in diameter; 17 areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolae fasciculate; numerous fultoportulae on valve face; marginal spine.
Distribution: Thalassiosira mendiolana has been mainly reported in the southern Pacific Ocean [19]. Park, Jung, Lee, Yun and Lee [84] first reported it in the Heuksando Island of the Yellow Sea of South Korea in the northwest Pacific. However, there are few records on this species, which mainly occurs in warm-water regions: Peru and Chilean waters ([78,89]; Gulf of California [73]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassiosira punctifera (Grunow) Fryxell, Simonsen & Hasle, 1974 [Figure 11k,l (SEM)]
Basionym: Coscinodiscus excentricus var. punctifera Grunow, 1884.
References: Simonsen [20], p. 10, pl. 2, Fig 4, pl. 3; Park, Jung, Lee, Yun and Lee [84], p. 417, Fig 36.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-05; 2017_KE-8-06.
Dimensions: Valves 30.3–59.7 in diameter; six to eight areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation fasciculate; two rimoportulae, one close to the central occluded areola and the other between the marginal fultoportulae.
Distribution: Thalassiosira punctifera is distributed in tropical to subtropical regions [84]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassiosira sacketii Fryxell, 1977 [Figure 6a–d (LM)]
References: Fryxell and Hasle [83], p. 76, pl. 6, Figs 35–39; Herzig and Fryxell [91], p. 19; Licea [92], p. 321, pl. 4, Figs 41, 42.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-05.
Dimensions: Valves 32.4–39.7 in diameter; nine to thirteen areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation radial, fasciculate; small spinules scattered on valve face.
Distribution: Thalassiosira sacketii has been observed in the Gulf of Mexico [83], Gulf Stream Warm Core Ring [91] in the Atlantic Ocean, and also the Pacific Ocean [92]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassisoira subtilis (Ostenfeld) Gran, 1900 [Figure 6g (LM)]
References: Hasle [85], p. 112, Figs 1–20, 66 and 67; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 58.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valve 47.3 µm in diameter; 16 areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Fultoportulae scattered on valve face; rimoportula somewhat far from valve margin.
Distribution: Thalassiosira subtilis is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassiosira symmetrica Fryxell & Hasle, 1973 [Figure 6e,f (LM)]
References: Fryxell and Hasle [90], p. 312, Figs 37-46; Simonsen [20], p. 11, pl. 6, Figs 1, 2; Rivera [78], p. 144; pl. 68, Figs 425–427, pl. 69, Figs 428–431; Herzig and Fryxell [91], p. 22; Hernández-Becerril and Peña [73], p. 552, Figs 59–61, 65; Aké-Castillo et al. [74], p. 497, Figs 33–36.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-04.
Dimensions: Valves 40.8–61.8 in diameter; five to six areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Absence of central fultoportula; single central areola surrounded by seven areolae in a symmetrical rosette; central ring of seven fultoportulae separated by two (ranging from one to three) areolae from central areola.
Distribution: Thalassisoira symmetrica is distributed from temperate to warm water in oceanic regions [84]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassiosira tenera Proschkina-Lavrenko, 1961 [Figure 6h (LM)]
References: Hasle and Fryxell [88], p. 28, Figs 54–65; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 59.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-04; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-18.
Dimensions: Valves 8.5–23.2 in diameter; 10–15 areolae in 10 μm.
Diagnostic: Areolation linear; a single central fultoportula replaces central areola; wedge-shaped external tube of marginal fultoportulae.
Distribution: Thalassiosira tenera usually occurs in the coastal area in temperate to warm-water regions [84,88]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Subclass Lithodesmiophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Lithodesmiales Round & R.M. Crawford, 1990
  • Family Lithodesmiaceae Round in Round et al., 1990
  • Genus Lithodesmium Ehrenberg, 1839
  • Lithodesmium variabile Takano, 1979 [Figure 6i (LM)]
References: Takano [93], p. 36, Figs 1A–M, 2–21.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-06.
Dimensions: 19.3 µm in diameter.
Diagnostic: Valves irregularly triangular; marginal ridge sparse.
Distribution: Lithodesmium variabile was first recorded in the Japanese coastal waters [93], and Hasle personally observed it in the Gulf of Naples [19]. Due to the lack of additional occurrence of this species, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of L. variabile in the KE region.
  • Subclass Chaetocerotophycidae Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Hemiaulales Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Family Hemiaulaceae Heiberg 1863
  • Genus Cerataulina H. Peragallo ex F. Schütt, 1896
  • Cerataulina pelagica (Cleve) Hendey, 1937 [Figure 6j (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 171.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: 24 µm in diameter.
Diagnostic: Wing-like elevation less conspicuous, rimoportula central or subcentral.
Distribution: Cerataulina pelagica is distributed worldwide [19] but is common to warm-water regions: Indian Ocean [20] and Thailand [21]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Hemiaulus Heiberg, 1863
  • Hemiaulus sinensis Greville, 1865 [Figure 6k,l (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 177.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: Valve 25.8–41.3 µm in apical axis; seven areolae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve face slightly concave; areolae coarse; elevation long; rimoportula submarginal.
Distribution: Hemiaulus sinensis is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Eucampia Ehrenberg, 1839
  • Eucampia cornuta (Cleve) Grunow, 1883 [Figure 6m (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 175.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: Valve 45.3 µm in apical axis.
Diagnostic: Valve face concave; elevation long, narrow; rimoportula in a depressed valve center.
Distribution: Eucampia cornuta is a warm-water species [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Order Chaetocerotales Round & R.M. Crawford in Round et al., 1990
  • Family Chaetocerotaceae Ralfs in Prichard, 1861
  • Genus Bacteriastrum Shabdolt, 1853
  • Bacteriastrum elongatum Cleve, 1897 [Figure 7a,b (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 189, pl. 37.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02.
Distribution: Bacteriastrum elongatum is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]; this species may therefore be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Bacteriastrum furcatum Shabdolt, 1853 [Figure 7c–e (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 189, pl. 37; Piredda et al. [94], Fig 2; Park et al. [95], p. 9, Fig 81.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-09.
Distribution: Bacteriastrum furcatum is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [94]; this species may therefore be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg, 1844
  • Chaetoceros affinis Lauder, 1864 [Figure 8a (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 217, pl. 46; Lee et al. [96], p. 615, Figs 1, 45–48.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Diagnostic: Terminal setae large, strongly divergent.
Distribution: Chaetoceros affinis is a cosmopolitan species [19], but is frequently found in the tropical regions of the west Pacific: the Philippines [34]; Thailand [21]; Hong Kong [97]; South Korea [96]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Chaetoceros atlanticus Cleve, 1873 [Figure 8b (LM)]
References: Cupp [98], p. 103, Fig 59A; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 196; Lee et al. [99], p. 175, Figs 1–2, 29–32.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-04.
Diagnostic: Apertures hexagonal; setae arising slightly within valve margin, base narrow, then usually widened and later tapered.
Comments: Chaetoceros atlanticus is an oceanic species [98]. Hasle and Syvertsen [19] regarded it as a cosmopolitan species; it has mainly been recorded in northern and southern cold-water regions (e.g., [98,100]. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Chaetoceros didymus Ehrenberg, 1845 [Figure 8c (LM)]
References: Ishii et al. [101], Figs 22, 23; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 207, pl. 43; Lee et al. [96], p. 621, Figs 22–23, 85–88.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-04.
Distribution: Chaetoceros didymus is distributed in warm to temperate regions (Hasle and Syvertsen [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
Comments: Although we only present the morphology of resting spores of C. didymus, Ishii, Iwataki, Matsuoka and Imai [101] proposed identification criteria for the resting spores of Chaetoceros species: The combination of morphological characteristics such as the single ring of puncta, the primary and secondary valve face, and mantle structure can help to identify the Chaetoceros species. Based on the resting spore morphology, the primary valve face is vaulted and smooth; the secondary valve face is inflated in the center, with paired setae emerging from the valve apex.
  • Chaetoceros eibenii Grunow, 1882 [Figure 8d (LM)]
References: Koch and Rivera [102], p. 65, Figs 13–22; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 201, pl. 41; Lee et al. 2014a, p. 181, Figs 19-20, 57-60.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Diagnostic: Large robust setae; sibling setae diverged at 90° angle.
Distribution: Chaetoceros eibenii is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Chaetoceros messanensis Castracane, 1875 [Figure 8e (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 216, pl. 45; Lee et al. [96], p. 623, Figs 29–30, 101–104.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Diagnostic: Special intercalary setae thicker than the others, first fused, then forked.
Distribution Chaetoceros messanensis is an oceanic warm-water species that mainly occurs in tropical and subtropical regions (e.g., [19,98]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Chaetoceros peruvianus Brightwell, 1856 [Figure 8f (LM)]
References: Cupp [98], p. 113, Fig 68a–c; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 195, pl. 38; Lee et al. [99], p. 184, Figs 21–22, 61–64.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Diagnostic: Heterovalvate; setae of upper valve arise in pervalvar direction from near valve center, abut with groove between them, turn sharply, and run backward in more or less outwardly convex curves.
Distribution: Chaetoceros peruvinavus is distributed in warm to temperate regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Chaetoceros radicans F. Schütt, 1895 [Figure 8g (LM)]
References: Cupp [98], p. 141, Fig 97; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 213, pl. 45; Lee et al. [96], p. 625, Figs 36–38, 113–116.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: Valve 14 µm in apical axis.
Diagnostic: Intercalary setae have hair-like siliceous spines.
Distribution: Chaetoceros radicans is a cosmopolitan species [19]. Due to its occurrence in a wide range of temperatures, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of C. radicans from the KE region.
  • Class Bacillariophyceae Haeckel, 1878
  • Subclass Fragilariophycidae Round in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Thalassionematales Round in Round et al., 1990
  • Family Thalassionemataceae Round in Round et al., 1990
  • Genus Lioloma Hasle, 1996
  • Lioloma pacificum (Cupp) Hasle, 1996 [Figure 9a–c (LM)]
Basionym: Thalassiothrix mediterranea var. pacifica Cupp 1943.
References: Cupp [98] p. 185, Fig 136; Simonsen [20], p. 38, pl. 24, Fig 5; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 254.
Sample: 2017-KE-01.
Dimensions: 667.9 µm long, 6 µm wide; 13 areolae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve slightly expanded in the middle and almost the same size as the head pole until it becomes somewhat enlarged for a short distance about one-third from wedge-shaped, blunt-ended foot pole.
Distribution: Lioloma pacificum is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Thalassionema Grunow ex Mereschkowsky, 1902
  • Thalassionema bacillare (Heiden) Kolbe, 1955 [Figure 9d,e (LM)]
Basionym: Spinigera bacillaris Heiden, 1928.
Synonym: Thalassionema elegans Hustedt, 1958.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 262.
Sample: 2017-KE-01.
Dimensions: 89.6–194.6 µm long, 2.9 µm wide.
Diagnostic: Valves more or less inflated in the middle and slightly expanded apices. Areolae visible with LM as circular or subcircular holes, a structure sometimes visible within the holes.
Distribution: Thalassionema bacillare is distributed in warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassionema frauenfeldii (Grunow) Tempère & Peragallo, 1910 [Figure 9f–j (LM)]
Basionym: Asterionella frauenfeldii Grunow, 1863.
Synonym: Thalassiothrix frauenfeldii (Grunow) Grunow, 1880.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 262.
Sample: 2017-KE-01, 2017-KE-02.
Dimensions: 111.7–350.2 µm long, 2.5–4.9 µm wide; six to ten areolae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves more or less expanded in the middle part, and slightly expanded apices. Areolae crossed by a simple strongly silicified bar, discernible with LM.
Distribution: Thalassionema frauenfeldii is distributed in temperate to warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassionema kuroshioensis Sugie & K.Suzuki, 2015 [Figure 9o,p (LM)]
References: Sugie and Suzuki [103], p. 240, Figs 2–21.
Sample: 2017-KE-02.
Dimensions: 487.3 µm long, 4.4 µm wide; four areolae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves linear with isopolar rounded apices.
Distribution: Sugie and Suzuki [103] found T. kuroshioensis from 28° to 33° N, 138° E in the north Pacific. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassionema nitzschioides var. nitzschoides (Grunow) Grunow, 1902 [Figure 9k–m (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 262.
Sample: 2017-KE-02.
Dimensions: 41.1–59.7 µm long, 4.0–5.1 µm wide; eight to eleven areolae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves linear to narrowly lanceolate, with rounded to capitate apices; marginal structure visible with LM as ribs.
Distribution: Thalassionema nitzschioides is a cosmopolitan species but is not abundant in the polar regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Thalassionema nitzschioides var. parva Heiden & Kolbe, 1928 [Figure 9n (LM)]
References: Lange-Bertalot [104], pl. 137, Fig 5; Siqueiros-Beltrones et al. [105], Fig 8f.
Sample: 2017-KE-01.
Dimensions: 14.5 µm long, 4.1 µm wide.
Diagnostic: Valves short, linear with rounded isopolar apices.
Distribution: Thalassionema nitzscioides var. parva has been reported in tropical regions: Revillagigedo Archipelago, Mexico [105]; near the shore of North America [104]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Subclass Urneidophycidae Medlin, 2016
  • Order Rhaphoneidales Round in Round et al., 1990
  • Family Rhaphoneidaceae Forti, 1912
  • Genus Neodelphineis H. Takano, 1983
  • Neodelphineis indica (F.J.R. Taylor) Tanimura, 1992 [Figure 12a,b (SEM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [70], p. 309, Figs 35–41; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 249.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-04.
Dimensions: 37.4–48.2 µm long, 7.0–9.3 µm wide; 15–17 striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves linear, inflated at the center, and rounded apices.
Distribution: Neodelphineis indica is distributed in warm to temperate regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Subclass Bacillariophycidae D.G.Mann in Round et al., 1990
  • Order Naviculales Bessey, 1907
  • Family Naviculaceae Kützing, 1844
  • Genus Navicula Bory, 1822
  • Navicula cf. transitantoides Foged, 1975 [Figure 10a–d (LM)]
References: Foged [35], p. 44, pl. 19, Figs 10, 11; Witkowski et al. [106], p. 310, pl. 135, Figs 2–6, pl. 146, Fig 13; Al-Handal et al. [107], p. 128, Fig 53.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-04.
Dimensions: 37.4–48.2 µm long, 7.0–9.3 µm wide; 15–17 striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves lanceolate with acute apices. Transapical striae parallel throughout the valve.
Distribution: Navicula transitantoides was first described from the east coast of Africa, Tanzania, in the Indian Ocean [35]. Subsequently, Witkowski, Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin [106] observed it in European waters, and Al-Handal, Thomas and Pennesi [107] reported it in the Gulf, but the specimen from the Gulf had coarser striae than that from the original publication (11–12 vs. 14–15). Due to the lack of additional records along the boundary of the northwestern Pacific Ocean, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of N. cf. transitantoides in the KE region.
Comments: The specimen from the northwestern Pacific Ocean is similar to N. transitantoides in the valve outline and striae arrangement, but the striae density is finer than in previous reports.
  • Family Pleurosigmataceae Mereschowsky, 1903
  • Genus Pleurosigma W. Smith, 1852
  • Pleurosigma directum Grunow, 1880 [Figure 10e,f (LM)]
References: Simonsen [20], p. 45, pl. 29, Figs 2a,b; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 282.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-09.
Dimensions: 100.3–104.1 µm long, 16.8–18.0 µm wide; 18–19 transapical striae 10 µm in size; 20–23 longitudinal striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves rhomboic–lanceolate; raphe almost straight.
Distribution: Hasle and Syvertsen [19] regarded P. directum as a probably cosmopolitan species. Due to the lack of additional records along the boundary of the northwestern Pacific Ocean, it is difficult to determine which current is related to the occurrence of P. directum in the KE region.
  • Pleurosigma diversestriatum F. Meister, 1934 [Figure 10g (LM)]
References: Foged [35], p. 50, pl. 17, Fig 3; Foged [108], p. 119, pl. 22, Fig 6; Navarro 1982, p. 325, Figs 93–94; Cardinal et al. 1989, Fig 50; Sterrenburg 2001a, p. 124, Figs 6, 15–18.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 87.7 µm long, 17.6 µm wide; 17 transapical striae in 10 µm; 12 longitudinal striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve sigmoid with acutely rounded apices; striae throughout in transverse and two oblique systems, the latter strongly curved in the central portion of the valve so that they are markedly stronger centrally.
Distribution: Pleurosigma diversestriatum was originally described in Nagasaki, Japan, in the northwestern Pacific Ocean (Meister 1934). This species was also reported in Tanzania, the Indian Ocean (Foged 1975), Australia (Foged 1978), and the Indonesian Archipelago (Sterrenburg 2001). This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Order Bacillariales Hendey, 1937
  • Family Bacillariaceae Ehrenberg, 1831
  • Genus Alveus Kaczmarska & Fryxell, 1996
  • Alveus marinus (Grunow) Kaczmarska & Fryxell, 1996 [Figure 10h,i (LM)]
Basionym: Nitzschia angustata var. marina Grunow, 1878.
Synonyms: Nitzschia marina (Grunow) Grunow in Cleve & Grunow, 1880; Synedra gausii Heiden in Heiden & Kolbe, 1928.
References: Kaczmarska and Fryxell [109], p. 3, Figs 1–35.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 225.7 µm long, 12.6 µm wide; 10 transapical striae in 10 µm; 15 areolae in 10 µm; nine fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve robust and linear with rounded apices; striae biseriate, parallel throughout.
Distribution: Alveus marinus is distributed in warm-water regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Fragilariopsis Hustedt, 1913
  • Fragilariopsis doliolus (Wallich) Medlin & P.A. Sims, 1993 [Figure 10j,k (LM)]
Basionym: Synedra doliolus Wallich 1860, p. 48, pl. 2, Fig 19.
Synonyms: Pseudo-eunotia doliolus (Wallich) Grunow in Van Heurck 1880, pl. 35, Fig 22.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 303, pl. 69.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-09; 2017_KE-8-18.
Dimensions: 47.5–80.3 µm long, 7.4–10.3 µm wide; 10–13 transapical striae in 10 µm; 16–22 areolae in 10 µm; 10–11 fibulae in 10 µm.
Distribution: Fragilariopsis doliolus is a warm-water species [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Fragilariopsis aff. oceanica (Cleve) Hasle, 1965 [Figure 10l (LM)]
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 299, pl. 67; Lundholm and Hasle [110], p. 442, Figs 1–23.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 39.6 µm long, 7.6 µm wide; 13 transapical striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve narrowly elliptic and isopolar with lanceolate apices; striae parallel to middle and radiate slightly at the ends.
Comments: Fragilariopsis oceanica has mainly been reported in northern cold-water regions [19]. In their study on the diatom fluxes in the subarctic Pacific, Onodera et al. [111] did not find F. oceanica below 40N. Although the valve outline and dimensions of the KE specimens match F. oceanica, their limited occurrence in the Arctic region casts doubt on its certain identification as F. oceanica. We temporarily identified the species as Fragilariopsis aff. oceanica.
  • Genus Neodenticula Akiba & Yanagisawa, 1986
  • Neodenticula seminae (Simonsen & T. Kanaya) Akiba & Yanagisawa, 1986 [Figure 10m,n (LM)]
Basionym: Denticula seminae Simonsen & T. Kanaya 1961, p. 503, pl. 1, Figs 26–30.
Synonyms: Denticulopsis seminae (Simonsen & T. Kanaya) Simonsen 1979, p. 65; Denticula maina Semina 1956, p. 82, Figs 1, 2.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 306, pl. 69; Poulin et al. [112], p. 129, 1–54.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 20.3–33.2 µm long, 5.9–7.8 µm wide; seven to eight transapical striae in 10 µm; seven to eight fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves linear to elliptical with broadly rounded ends; striae straight; pseudosepta formed distinct lines; both ends of a crossbar connected to the thick valve wall by a suture.
Distribution: Neodenticula seminae is common in the North Pacific Ocean (Hasle & Syvertsen 1996) and has also been observed in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, in the North Atlantic [112]. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Genus Nitzschia Hassall, 1845
  • Nitzschia bicapitata Cleve, 1901 [Figure 10o–s (LM), Figure 12c,d (SEM)]
References: Fryxell [113], p. 46, Figs 1–11; Kaczmarska and Fryxell [114], p. 238, Figs 4–7, 9 and 10; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 330, pl. 74.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02; 2017_KE-8-06; 2017_KE-8-09; 2017_KE-8-18.
Dimensions: 4.4–50.6 µm long, 2.5–6.84 µm wide; 24–40 transapical striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves highly variable such as elliptical–lanceolate, linear–lanceolate, linear–elliptical with capitate apices. Striae arched; uniseriate throughout.
Distribution: Nitzschia bicapiatata is known as a warm to temperate water species [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Nitzschia bifurcata Kaczmarska & Licea, 1986 [Figure 12e (SEM)]
References: Kaczmarska and Fryxell [114], p. 241, Figs 1–3, 8 A–E; Tanimura 1992, p. 138, Figs 9.8–9.10, 12.5–12.6.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: 10.9 µm long, 4.5 µm wide; 36 transapical striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves rhomboid with rostrate apices. Striae arched; uniseriate changes to biseriate near the margin opposite the raphe.
Distribution: Nitzschia bifurcata was first described in Gulf Stream materials (Kaczmarska and Fryxell 1986). Tanimura (1992) observed this species in sediment samples in the northwest Pacific, in the path of the Kuroshio Current.
  • Nitzschia interruptestriata Simonsen, 1974 [Figure 10t,u (LM)]
References: Simonsen [20], p. 52, pl. 36, Figs 9–11, pl. 37, Figs 1–7, pl. 38, Figs 1–12; Barron [115], pl. 6, Figs 13, 19.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-04; 2017_KE-8-06.
Dimensions: 74.0–89.6 µm long, 4.7–6.6 µm wide; 16–27 transapical striae in 10 µm; 7–12 fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valves lanceolate with rostrate apices; striae parallel throughout, interrupted by the apical hyaline line near the middle part of the valve.
Distribution: Simonsen [20] found N. interruptestirata in the Indian Ocean, and Barron [115] reported this species from sediment samples in the tropical eastern Pacific. Tanimura [116] found this species in a sediment trap deployed in the path of the Kuroshio Current of the northwest Pacific. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Nitzschia kolaczeckii Grunow, 1867 [Figure 10v,w (LM)]
References: Schmidt [117], pl. 349, Figs 38, 39; Foged [35], p. 46, pl. 28, Figs 7, 8; Koizumi [118], Fig 25; Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 328.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 87.6–96.9 µm long, 8.1–8.2 µm wide; 14–16 transapical striae in 10 µm; 10–12 areolae in 10 µm; seven to eight fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve lanceolate with slightly stretched apices; areolae distinct with diagonal grid pattern.
Distribution: Nitzschia kolaczeckii is distributed in warm-water regions [19]: the Philippines [117]; East Sea (Sea of Japan) [118]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Nitzschia sicula var. sicula (Castracane) Hustedt, 1958 [Figure 10x (LM)]
Basionym: Synedra sicula Castracane, 1875.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 327; Tanimura [116], Fig 10.1.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01.
Dimensions: 33.2 µm long, 7.7 µm wide; seven transapical striae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve lanceolate with obtusely rounded apices. Transapical striae parallel throughout.
Distribution: Nitzschia sicula var. sicula is distributed in warm-water to temperate regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Nitzschia sicula var. bicuneata (Grunow) Hasle, 1960 [Figure 10y–aa (LM)]
Basionym: Rhaphoneis bicuneata Grunow in Cleve and Möller, 1879.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 327, pl. 75.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-05; 2017_KE-8-09.
Dimensions: 23.8–44.0 µm long, 6.1–9.8 µm wide; 7–10 transapical striae in 10 µm; 7–10 fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve lanceolate with slightly rounded apices; transapical striae in the central area are rather short due to the presence of a central depression.
Distribution: Nitzschia sicula var. bicuneata is distributed in warm-water to temperate regions [19]. This species may be transported along the Kuroshio Current.
  • Genus Psammodictyon D.G.Mann in Round et al., 1990
  • Psammodictyon sp. [Figure 10ab,ac (LM), 140 (SEM)]
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 14.9–16.5 µm long, 6.7–6.9 µm wide; transapical striae invisible in LM; 13–16 fibulae in 10 µm.
  • Genus Pseudo-nitzschia H. Peragallo, 1900
  • Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides (Hustedt) Hasle, 1993 [Figure 10ad (LM)]
Basionym: Nitzschia turgiduloides Hasle, 1996.
Synoynm: Pseudo-nitzschia barkleyi var. obtusa Manguin, 1960.
References: Hasle and Syvertsen [19], p. 319; Almandoz et al. [119], p. 440, Figs 7a–d.
Sample: 2017_KE-8-01; 2017_KE-8-02.
Dimensions: 129.9 µm long, 2.9 µm wide; 20 transapical striae in 10 µm; 11 fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve linear, expanded in the middle with rounded apices; interstriae visible in LM; central space distinct.
Distribution: Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides is a commonly known southern cold-water species [19,119]. The occurrence of this species was first identified in the northwest Pacific Ocean. This species may be transported along the Oyashio Current.
  • Genus Tryblionella W. Smith, 1853
  • Tryblionella coarctata (Grunow) D.G. Mann, 1990 [Figure 10ae,af (LM)]
Basionym: Nitzschia coarctata Grunow, 1880.
References: Cleve and Grunow [120], p. 68; Witkowski, Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin [106], p. 374, pl. 183, Fig 13, pl. 186, Figs 4–13; Al-Handal et al. [121], p. 36, pl. 10, Fig 13; López-Fuerte, Siqueiros Beltrones and Altamirano-Cerecedo [48], p. 20, Figs 43a–d,g,h.
Sample: 2017-KE-02.
Dimensions: 26.2–34.0 µm long, 10.2–12.5 µm wide; 15–16 transapical striae in 10 µm; 12 fibulae in 10 µm.
Diagnostic: Valve panduriform with broadly cuneate, short rostrate apices; transapical striae distinct, interrupted by longitudinal fold.
Distribution: Tryblionella coarctata is a neritic species, known as a marine to brackish-water species [106], and it has mainly been reported in temperate to tropical regions: off Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico [48]. This species may have been transported from the coastal areas to the KE region via the Kuroshio Current.
Comments: The KE specimen exhibits denser striae (15–16 in 10 µm) compared to the original and subsequent works: Cleve and Grunow [120] originally described a striae density of 11–12 in 10 µm; Witkowski, Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin [106] noted a sparser arrangement than the original material (8–10 in 10 µm); López-Fuerte, Siqueiros Beltrones and Altamirano-Cerecedo [48] described a striae density similar to the original material (12 in 10 µm). The KE specimen shows similarity to the specimen from Reunion and Rodrigues Islands as described by Al-Handal, Compere and Riaux-Gobin [121], who also reported a striae density of 12–16 in 10 µm.

4. Discussion

The development of taxonomic reference flora of diatoms from specific regions is crucial for bolstering long-term records [122], facilitating the accurate identification of species [123], and evaluating diatom assemblage structure efficiently [124,125]. This is the first study that evaluates the flora of diatoms in the KE region; we identified and described 82 diatom species. The most diverse genera were Thalassiosira (10 spp.) and Chaetoceros (7 spp.), which were commonly reported in pelagic systems, but also found in coastal regions (e.g., [84,96,99]. The occurrences of these genera in both neritic and pelagic systems indicate that they can be distributed worldwide via the current, but the species in the KE are mainly composed of taxa that prefer pelagic habitats. Based on the previous species records provided in the taxa list in the Results section, we can divide the diatoms into cold, warm, and eurythermal species. Fifty-five species were warm-water taxa that were transported via the Kuroshio Current, while twelve cold-water species were transported via the Oyashio Current (Table 1). The transfer of the remaining 14 species was uncertain in terms of which current influenced them, because they were widely distributed from cold- to warm-water regions. In the KE region, warm-water species predominated along the path of the Kuroshio Current, but the occurrence of species migrating southward along the Oyashio Current indicates that this region can be the crossroad between warm- and cold-water species. Along the Kuroshio Current, several studies on diatoms were performed near the east of Japan (e.g., [116,126,127]). Tanimura [116] reported 124 species except for the unidentified taxa from the time-series sediment trap in the Japanese Trench, and he illustrated results for only 37 taxa. Koizumi, Irino and Oba [126] and Koizumi and Yamamoto [127] used the diatoms as a proxy of a paleography of the Kuroshio Current, and they listed 145 diatom species, except for unidentified ones, and did not provide any flora. From these three studies, 209 diatom species were listed from the northern part of the Kuroshio Current (NKC) (Table S1). These works showed a higher number of species than our work, due to their study areas being close to Japanese coasts and including a greater number of neritic species than the KE regions. Of 81 taxa, excluding Psammodictyon sp., which occurred in the present study, 51 are also reported in the compiled checklist of the NKC, but 30 species, namely Coscinodiscopsis jonesaina, Coscinodiscus argus, C. gigas, Actinocyclus iraidae, Azpeitia neocrenulata, Proboscia indica, Sundstroemia pungens, Detonula confervacea, Minidiscus trioculatus, Planktoniella blanda, Shionodiscus cf. oestrupii var. venrickae, S. aff. poro-irregulatus, S. variantus, Takanoa bingesis, Thalassiosira mendiolana, T. punctifera, T. sacketii, Lithodesmium variabile, Cerataulina pelagica, Bacterastrum furcatum, Chaetoceros atlanticus, C. eibenii, Lioloma pacificum, Thalassionema kuroshioensis, Navicula cf. transistantoides, Pleurosigma directum, P. diverse-striatum, Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides, Fragilaria aff. oceanica, and Tryblionella coarctata, were not listed. With the addition of our flora, a preliminary checklist reports 239 diatom taxa occurring in the northeastern path of the Kuroshio Current. The diatom flora and future continued research in the KE area will help us understand the hydrographical dynamics of the Kuroshio Current through the emergence of additional coastal species that can migrate along the current.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/taxonomy4030025/s1, Table S1: The preliminary checklist of the diatoms in the pathway of Kuroshio Current. The species in bold indicate newly reported in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S.P.; methodology, J.S.P. and H.J.H.; validation, J.S.P. and H.J.K.; formal analysis, J.S.P.; investigation, J.S.P., H.J.K., K.-W.L. and Y.J.K.; resources, H.J.K.; data curation, J.S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.P.; writing—review and editing, J.S.P., H.J.K., K.-W.L. and Y.J.K.; visualization, J.S.P. and H.J.H.; supervision, J.S.P.; funding acquisition, Y.J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the High Seas bioresources program of the Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (KIMST-20210646).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olson, R.J.; Chisholm, S.W.; Zettler, E.R.; Altabet, M.A.; Dusenberry, J.A. Spatial and temporal distributions of prochlorophyte picoplankton in the North Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1990, 37, 1033–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Malone, T.C.; Pike, S.E.; Conley, D.J. Transient variations in phytoplankton productivity at the JGOFS Bermuda time series station. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1993, 40, 903–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Campbell, L.; Liu, H.; Nolla, H.A.; Vaulot, D. Annual variability of phytoplankton and bacteria in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean at Station ALOHA during the 1991–1994 ENSO event. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1997, 44, 167–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goldman, J.C. Potential role of large oceanic diatoms in new primary production. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1993, 40, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Malviya, S.; Scalco, E.; Audic, S.; Vincent, F.; Veluchamy, A.; Poulain, J.; Wincker, P.; Iudicone, D.; de Vargas, C.; Bittner, L.; et al. Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Goldman, J.C. Spatial and temporal discontinuities of biological processes in pelagic surface waters. In Toward a Theory on Biological-Physical Interactions in the World Ocean; Rothschild, B.J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 273–296. [Google Scholar]
  7. Romero, O.E.; Armand, L.K. Marine diatoms as indicators of modern changes in oceanographic conditions. In The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2nd ed.; Stoermer, E.F., Smol, J.P., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 373–400. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rochín Bañaga, H.; Siqueiros Beltrones, D.A.; Bollmann, J. Benthic diatoms from shallow environments deposited at a 300 m depth in a southern Gulf of California basin. CICIMAR Oceánides 2015, 30, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Spaulding, S.A.; Potapova, M.G.; Bishop, I.W.; Lee, S.S.; Gasperak, T.S.; Jovanoska, E.; Furey, P.C.; Edlund, M.B. Diatoms.org: Supporting taxonomists, connecting communities. Diatom Res. 2021, 36, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jayne, S.R.; Hogg, N.G.; Waterman, S.N.; Rainville, L.; Donohue, K.A.; Randolph Watts, D.; Tracey, K.L.; McClean, J.L.; Maltrud, M.E.; Qiu, B.; et al. The Kuroshio Extension and its recirculation gyres. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2009, 56, 2088–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Kang, J.; Sun, X.; Huang, J.; Lin, Y.; Xiang, P. Spatial patterns of phytoplankton community and biomass along the Kuroshio Extension and adjacent waters in late spring. Mar. Biol. 2021, 168, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Takahashi, K.; Onodera, J.; Katsurada, Y. Relationship between time-series diatom fluxes in the central and western equatorial Pacific and ENSO-associated migrations of the Western Pacific Warm Pool. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2009, 56, 1298–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fassbender, A.J.; Sabine, C.L.; Palevsky, H.I. Nonuniform ocean acidification and attenuation of the ocean carbon sink. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 8404–8413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.J.; Kim, D.; Park, Y.-G.; Park, J.-Y.; Choi, K.-Y.; Park, J.S.; An, S.M.; Kwon, K.; Noh, J.H.; Hwang, J. Influence of atmospheric dust deposition on sinking particle flux in the northwest Pacific. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1180480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hasle, G.R.; Fryxell, G.A. Cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 1970, 89, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moore, T.C. Method of randomly distributing grains for microscopic examination. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1973, 43, 904–906. [Google Scholar]
  17. Adl, S.M.; Bass, D.; Lane, C.E.; Lukeš, J.; Schoch, C.L.; Smirnov, A.; Agatha, S.; Berney, C.; Brown, M.W.; Burki, F.; et al. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2019, 66, 4–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  19. Hasle, G.R.; Syvertsen, E.E. Marine diatoms. In Identifying Marine Diatoms and Dinoflagellates; Tomas, C.R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996; pp. 5–385. [Google Scholar]
  20. Simonsen, R. The diatom plankton of the Indian Ocean Expedition of R/V Meteor 1964–1965. “Meteor” Forschungsergebnisse Reihe D 1974, 19, 1–107. [Google Scholar]
  21. Teanpisut, K.; Patarajinda, S. Species diversity of marine planktonic diatoms around Chang Islands, Trat Province. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 2007, 41, 114–124. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cleve, P.T. Examination of diatoms fround on the surface of the Sea of Java. In Bihang till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar; Norstedt: Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 1873; Volume 1, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schmidt, A. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. In Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1974–1976; Series I; pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tiffany, M.; Hernández-Becerril, D.U. Valve development in the diatom family Asterolampraceae H. L. Smith 1872. Micropaleontology 2005, 51, 217–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Scott, F.J.; Thomas, D.P. Diatoms. In Antarctic Marine Protists; Scott, F.J., Marchan, H.J., Eds.; Australian Biological Resources Study: Canberra, Australian, 2005; pp. 13–201. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cupp, E.E. Seasonal distribution and occurrence of marine diatoms and dinoflagellates at Scotch Cap, Alaska. In Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography of the University of California; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA; Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1937; Volume 4, pp. 71–100. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hernández-Becerril, D.U. Reinstatement of the diatom genus Spatangidium (Bacillariophyta): The type species S. arachne. Phycologia 1992, 31, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pritchard, A. A History of Infusoria, Living and Fossil: Arranged According to Die Infusionsthierchen of C.G. Ehrenberg; Containing Colored Engravings, Illustrative of All the Genera, and Descriptions of All the Species in that Work, with Several New Ones; to Which Is Appended An Account of Those Recently Discovered in the Chalk Formations. xii; Whittaker: London, UK, 1861; p. 968. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sar, E.A.; Sunesen, I.; Hinz, F. Fine morphology of Coscinodiscus jonesianus and Coscinodiscus commutatus and their transfer to Coscinodiscopsis gen. nov. Diatom Res. 2008, 23, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hasle, G.R.; Sims, P.A. The diatom genus Coscinodiscus Ehrenb.: C. argus Ehrenb. and C. radiatus Ehrenb. Bot. Mar. 1986, 29, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ehrenberg, C.G. Über die Bildung der Kreidefelsen und des Kreidemergels durch unsichtbare Organismen. Abh. Der Königlichen Akad. Der Wiss. Zu Berl. Phys. Kl. 1839, 1838, 59–147. [Google Scholar]
  32. Abbott, W.H.; Andrews, G.W. Middle Miocene marine diatoms from the Hawthorn Formation within the Ridgeland Trough, South Carolina and Georgia. Micropaleontology 1979, 25, 225–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hasle, G.R.; Lange, C.B. Morphology and distribution of Coscinodiscus species from the Oslofjord, Norway, and the Skagerrak, North Atlantic. Diatom Res. 1992, 7, 37–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mann, A. Marine diatoms of the Philippine Islands. In United States National Museum: Bulletin 100; GPO: Washington, DC, USA, 1925; Volume 6, p. 182. [Google Scholar]
  35. Foged, N. Some Littoral Diatoms from the Coast of Tanzania. Biblioth. Phycol. 1975, 16, 1–127. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmidt, A. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. In Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1877–1886; Series II; pp. 49–96. [Google Scholar]
  37. Takano, H. Scanning electron microscopy of diatoms—III. Coscinodiscus gigas Ehrenberg. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 1976, 88, 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cleve, P.T. Plankton from the Indian Ocean and the Malay Archipelago; Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar; PA Norstedt: Stockholm, Sweden, 1901; Volume 35, pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sancetta, C. Three species of Coscinodiscus Ehrenberg from North Pacific sediments examined in the light and scanning electron microscopes. Micropaleontology 1987, 33, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nikolaev, V.A.; Kociolek, J.P.; Fourtanier, E.; Barron, J.A.; Harwood, D.M. Late Cretaceous diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from the Marca Shale Member of the Moreno Formation, California; Califronia Academy of Science: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001; Volume 152, p. 119. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sar, E.A.; Sunesen, I.; Jahn, R. Coscinodiscus perforatus revisited and compared with Coscinodiscus radiatus (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia 2010, 49, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ostenfeld, C.H. Marine Plankton Diatoms. In Flora of Koh Chang. Contributions to the Knowledge of the Vegetation in the Gulf of Siam; Schmidt, J., Ed.; Botanisk Tidsskrift: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1902; Volume 25, pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee, J.H.; Kang, S.-H.; Joo, H.M.; Park, J.S. Illustrations of Phytoplankton Diatoms in the Arctic and Antarctic Oceans; Korea Polar Research Institute: Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2016; p. 248. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, J.H.; Chang, M. Morphological variations of the marine diatom genus Actinoptychus in the coastal waters of Korea. Algae 1996, 11, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
  45. Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A.; Argumedo-Hernández, U. Particular structure of an epiphytic diatom assembalge living on Ploclamium cartilagineum (Lamoroux) Dixon (Rhodophyceae: Gigartinales). CICIMAR Oceánides 2014, 29, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A.; Hernández, U.A.; Cansigno, C.L. Uncommon species diversity values in epiphytic diatom assemblages of the kelp Eisenia arborea. Hidrobiológica 2016, 26, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Uematsu, Y.; Aoki, S.; Okamoto, K.; Hino, A. Benthic diatom flora of intertidal sediment in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Diatom 2019, 35, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. López-Fuerte, F.O.; Siqueiros Beltrones, D.A.; Altamirano-Cerecedo, M.D. Species composition and new records of diatom taxa on Phyllodictyon pulcherrimum (Chlorophyceae) from the Gulf of California. Diversity 2020, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koizumi, I. The Late Cenozoic Diatoms of Sites 183–193, Leg 19 Deep Sea Drilling Project; 0080-8334; Texas A & M University, Ocean Drilling Program: College Station, TX, USA, 1973; pp. 805–855. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jousé, A.P. Species novae Bacillariophytorum in sedimentis fundi Oceani Pacifici et Maris Ochotensis Inventae. Novit. Syst. Plant. Non Vasc. 1968, 1968, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  51. Koizumi, I. Diatom-derived SSTs (Td’ ratio) indicate warm seas off Japan during the middle Holocene (8.2–3.3 kyr BP). Mar. Micropaleontol. 2008, 69, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Makarova, I.V. Species Nova Generis Actinocyclus e Mari Caspico. Not. Syst. Sect. Cryptogam. Instituti Bot. Nomine V.L. Komar. Acad. Sci. URSS 1959, 12, 83–84. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gogorev, R.M.; Pushina, Z.V. The genus Actinocyclus (Bacillariophyta) in the Antarctic Ocean. Issues Mod. Algol. Bull. 2015, 35–37. Available online: http://algology.ru/806 (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  54. Makarova, I.V. Combinationes taxorum generis Actinocyclus Ehr. novae. Novit. Syst. Plant. Non Vasc. 1985, 22, 96–99. [Google Scholar]
  55. Fryxell, G.A.; Sims, P.A.; Watkins, T.P. Azpeitia (Bacillariophyceae): Related genera and promorphology. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 1986, 13, 1–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Garcia, M.; Odebrecht, C. Remarks on the morphology and distribution of some rare centric diatoms in southern Brazilian continental shelf and slope waters. Braz. J. Ocean. 2012, 60, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.Y. A light and electron microscope study on the marine diatom Roperia tesselata (Roper) Grunow. Diatom Res. 1990, 5, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hasle, G.R. The biogeography of some marine planktonic diatoms. Deep Sea Res. 1976, 23, 319–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hasle, G.R.; Sims, P.A.; Syvertsen, E.E. Two recent Stellarima species: S. microtrias and S. stellaris (Bacillariophyceae). Bot. Mar. 1988, 31, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hernández-Becerril, D.U. Planktonic diatoms from the Gulf of California and coasts off Baja California: The genera Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, and former Rhizosolenia species. Diatom Res. 1995, 10, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yun, S.M.; Lee, J.H. Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae, genus Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen in Korean coastal waters. Algae 2011, 26, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Boonprakob, A.; Lundholm, N.; Medlin, L.K.; Moestrup, Ø. The morphology and phylogeny of the diatom genera Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia and Neocalyptrella from Gulf of Thailand and the Andaman Sea, with description of Rhizosolenia loanicola sp. nov., Proboscia siamensis sp. nov. and Probosciales ord. nov. Diatom Res. 2021, 36, 143–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yun, S.-M.; Lee, J.-H. Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, Family Rhizosoleniaceae, in Korean coastal waters: A genus Rhizosolenia 1. Algae 2010, 25, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Schmidt, A. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. In Aschersleben, Commissions-Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1913–1921; Series VII; pp. 289–336. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sundström, B.G. The marine diatom genus Rhizosolenia. In A New Approach to the Taxonomy; Lund University, Faculty of Science: Lund, Sweden, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yun, S.-M.; Lee, S.-D.; Lee, J.-H. Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae, genus Rhizosolenia, in Korean coastal waters. Algae 2011, 26, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hasle, G.R. Some marine plankton genera of the diatom family Thalassiosiraceae. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Recent and Fossil Marine Diatoms, London, UK, 4–9 September 1972; pp. 1–68. [Google Scholar]
  68. Syvertsen, E.E. Resting spore formation in clonal cultures of Thalassiosira antarctica Comber, T. nordenskioeldii Cleve and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. In Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms, Antwerp, Belgium, 3–8 September 1978; pp. 41–63. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kaczmarska, I.; Lovejoy, C.; Potvin, M.; Macgillivary, M. Morphological and molecular characteristics of selected species of Minidiscus (Bacillariophyta, Thalassiosiraceae). Eur. J. Phycol. 2009, 44, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hasle, G.R.; Syvertsen, E.E. New nomenclatural combinations of marine planktonic diatoms. The families Thalassiosiraceae and Rhaphoneidaceae. Beih. Zur Nova Hedwig. 1993, 106, 297–314. [Google Scholar]
  71. Fryxell, G.A.; Hasle, G.R. The marine diatom Thalassiosira oestrupii: Structure, taxonomy and distribution. Am. J. Bot. 1980, 67, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lee, J.H.; Yoo, K.-I. A study on the fine structure of the marine diatoms of Korean coastal waters—genus Thalassiosira 1. J. Oceanol. Soc. Korea 1986, 21, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hernández-Becerril, D.U.; Peña, M.I.T. Planktonic diatoms from the Gulf of California and coasts off Baja California: Species of the genus Thalassiosira. Bot. Mar. 1995, 38, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Aké-Castillo, J.A.; Hernández-Becerril, D.U.; Meave del Castillo, M.E. Species of the Genus Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyceae) from the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Bot. Mar. 1999, 42, 487–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Naya, T. Marine Thalassiosira species from coastal Pleistocene sediments in central Kanto Plain, Japan. Diatom Res. 2012, 27, 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fryxell, G.A.; Hasle, G.R. The genus Thalassiosira: T. trifulta sp. nova and other species with tricolumnar supports on strutted processes. In Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms, Antwerp, Belgium, 3–8 September 1978; pp. 13–40. [Google Scholar]
  77. Shiono, M. Two new species of the Thalassiosira trifulta group in late Pliocene sediments of the northwest Pacific Ocean. Diatom Res. 2001, 16, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rivera, P. Beiträge zur taxonomie und verbreitung der gattung Thalassiosira Cleve (Bacillariophyceae) in den Küstengewässern Chiles. Bibl. Phycol. 1981, 56, 1–225. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lee, J.H.; Park, J.S. Newly recorded diatom species in marine and fresh water of Korea. J. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 38, 545–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fryxell, G.A.; Johansen, J.R. Family Thalassiosiraceae Section 2. In Polar Marine Diatoms; Medlin, L.K., Priddle, J., Eds.; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council: Cambridge, UK, 1990; pp. 98–104. [Google Scholar]
  81. Takano, H. New and rare diatoms from Japanese marine waters—IV. Thalassiosira bingensis sp. nov. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 1980, 103, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  82. Makarova, I.V. The morphology of marine genera of the family Thalassiosiraceae Lebour emend Hasle. In Proceedings of the 11th International Diatom Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–17 August 1990; Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences. pp. 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  83. Fryxell, G.A.; Hasle, G.R. The genus Thalassiosira: Some species with a modified ring of central strutted processes. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Recent and Fossil Marine Diatoms, Oslo, Norway, 30 August–3 September 1976; pp. 67–98. [Google Scholar]
  84. Park, J.S.; Jung, S.W.; Lee, S.D.; Yun, S.M.; Lee, J.H. Species diversity of the genus Thalassiosira (Thalassiosirales, Bacillariophyta) in South Korea and its biogeographical distribution in the world. Phycologia 2016, 55, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hasle, G.R. Thalassiosira subtilis (Bacillariophyceae) and two allied species. Nor. J. Bot. 1972, 19, 111–137. [Google Scholar]
  86. Miyahara, K.; Nagai, S.; Itakura, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Fujisawa, K.; Iwamoto, T.; Yoshimatsu, S.; Matsuoka, S.; Yuasa, A.; Makino, K.; et al. First record of a bloom of Thalassiosira diporocyclus in the Eastern Seto Inland Sea. Fish. Sci. 1996, 62, 878–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Lü, S. The genus Thalassiosira off the Guangdong coast, South China Sea. Bot. Mar. 2013, 56, 83–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hasle, G.R.; Fryxell, G.A. The genus Thalassiosira: Some species with a linear areola array. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Recent and Fossil Marine Diatoms, Oslo, Norway, 30 August–3 September 1976; pp. 15–66. [Google Scholar]
  89. Hasle, G.R.; Heimdal, B.R. Some species of the centric diatom genus Thalassiosira studied in the light and electron microscope. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 1970, 31, 559–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fryxell, G.A.; Hasle, G.R. Thalassiosira eccentrica (Ehrenb.) Cleve, T. Symmetrica sp. nov., and some related centric diatoms. J. Phycol. 1972, 8, 297–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Herzig, W.N.; Fryxell, G.A. The diatoms genus Thalassiosira Cleve in Gulf Stream warm core rings: Taxonomy with T. intrannula and T. lineoides, spp. nov. Bot. Mar. 1986, 29, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Licea, S. Thalassiosira species from the southern Gulf of Mexico. In Proceedings of the 11th International Diatom Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12–17 August 1990; pp. 311–335. [Google Scholar]
  93. Takano, H. New and rare diatoms from Japanese marine waters—III. Lithodesmium variabile sp. nov. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 1979, 100, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  94. Piredda, R.; Sarno, D.; De Luca, D.; Kooistra, W.H.C.F. Biogeography of six species in the planktonic diatom genus Bacteriastrum (Bacillariophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 2022, 57, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Park, J.S.; Lobban, C.S.; Lee, K.-W.; Jung, S.W. Additional floristic study of planktonic and seaweed-associated diatoms in Chuuk, Micronesia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2022, 102, 27–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lee, S.D.; Joo, H.M.; Lee, J.H. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. II. Subgenus Hyalochaete. Phycologia 2014, 53, 614–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lauder, H.S. Remarks on the marine Diatomaceae found at Hong Kong with descriptions of new species. Trans. Microsc. Soc. J. 1864, 12, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cupp, E.E. Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of North America. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. Univ. Calif. 1943, 5, 1–238. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lee, S.D.; Park, J.S.; Yun, S.M.; Lee, J.H. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. I. Subgenus Chaetoceros. Phycologia 2014, 53, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Priddle, J.; Fryxell, G. Handbook of the Common Plankton Diatoms of the Southern Ocean: Centrales Except the Genus Thalassiosira; British Antarctic Survey: Cambridge, UK, 1985; Volume 159.
  101. Ishii, K.I.; Iwataki, M.; Matsuoka, K.; Imai, I. Proposal of identification criteria for resting spores of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyceae) from a temperate coastal sea. Phycologia 2011, 50, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Koch, P.; Rivera, P. Contribution to the diatom flora of Chile III. The genus Chaetoceros Ehr. (subgenus Phaeoceros Gran.). Gayana Bot. 1984, 41, 61–84. [Google Scholar]
  103. Sugie, K.; Suzuki, K. A new marine araphid diatom, Thalassionema kuroshioensis sp. nov., from temperate Japanese coastal waters. Diatom Res. 2015, 30, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lange-Bertalot, H. SEM-Studied Diatoms of Different Regions of the World Ocean. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2003, 10, 363. [Google Scholar]
  105. Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A.; López-Fuerte, F.O.; Martínez, Y.J.; Altamirano-Cerecedo, M.D. A first estimate of species diversity for benthic diatom assemblages from the Revillagigedo Archipelago, Mexico. Diversity 2021, 13, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Witkowski, A.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Metzeltin, D. Diatom flora of marine coasts I. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2000, 7, 1–925. [Google Scholar]
  107. Al-Handal, A.Y.; Thomas, E.W.; Pennesi, C. Marine benthic diatoms in the newly discovered coral reefs, off Basra coast, Southern Iraq. Phytotaxa 2018, 372, 111–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Foged, N. Diatoms in Eastern Australia. Bibl. Phycol. 1978, 41, 1–148. [Google Scholar]
  109. Kaczmarska, I.; Fryxell, G.A. Alveus, gen. nov. (Bacillariaceae, Bacillariophyta), a heavily silicified diatom found in warm water oceans. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1996, 33, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lundholm, N.; Hasle, G.R. Fragilariopsis (Bacillariophyceae) of the Northern Hemisphere—Morphology, taxonomy, phylogeny and distribution, with a description of F. pacifica sp. nov. Phycologia 2010, 49, 438–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Onodera, J.; Takahashi, K.; Honda, M.C. Pelagic and coastal diatom fluxes and the environmental changes in the northwestern North Pacific during December 1997–May 2000. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2005, 52, 2218–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Poulin, M.; Lundholm, N.; Berard-Therriault, L.; Starr, M.; Gagnon, R. Morphological and phylogenetic comparisons of Neodenticula seminae (Bacillariophyta) populations between the subarctic Pacific and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Eur. J. Phycol. 2010, 45, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fryxell, G.A. Nitzschia bicapitata (Bacillariophyceae) and related taxa from oceanic aggregations. Diatom Res. 2000, 15, 43–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kaczmarska, I.; Fryxell, G.A. The diatom genus Nitzschia: Morphologic variation of some small bicapitate species in two Gulf Stream warm core rings. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Diatom Symposium, Paris, France, 27 August–1 September 1984; pp. 237–252. [Google Scholar]
  115. Barron, J.A. Upper Pliocene and Quaternary Diatom Biostratigraphy of Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 54, Tropical Eastern Pacific; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1980; pp. 455–485. [Google Scholar]
  116. Tanimura, Y. Seasonal changes in flux and species composition of diatoms: Sediment trap results from the Northwest Pacific, August 1986–November 1988. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus. Ser. C 1992, 18, 121–154. [Google Scholar]
  117. Schmidt, A. Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. In Aschersleben Commissions Verlag Von Ludwig Siever’s Buchandlung; Koeltz Scientific Books: Koenigstein, Germany, 1921–1930; Series VIII; pp. 337–372. [Google Scholar]
  118. Koizumi, I. Holocene pulses of diatom growths in the warm Tsushima current in the Japan Sea. Diatom Res. 1989, 4, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Almandoz, G.O.; Ferreyra, G.A.; Schloss, I.R.; Dogliotti, A.I.; Rupolo, V.; Paparazzo, F.E.; Esteves, J.L.; Ferrario, M.E. Distribution and ecology of Pseudo-nitzschia species (Bacillariophyceae) in surface waters of the Weddell Sea (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 2008, 31, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cleve, P.T.; Grunow, A. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Arctischen Diatomeen. Kongliga Sven.-Vetensk. Akad. Handl. 1880, 17, 1–121. [Google Scholar]
  121. Al-Handal, A.Y.; Compere, P.; Riaux-Gobin, C. Marine benthic diatoms in the coral reefs of Reunion and Rodrigues Islands, West Indian Ocean. Micronesica 2016, 3, 1–78. [Google Scholar]
  122. Alers-García, J.; Lee, S.S.; Spaulding, S.A. Resources and practices to improve diatom data quality. Limnol. Oceanogr. Bull. 2021, 30, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lee, S.S.; Bishop, I.W.; Spaulding, S.A.; Mitchell, R.M.; Yuan, L.L. Taxonomic harmonization may reveal a stronger association between diatom assemblages and total phosphorus in large datasets. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 102, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Bishop, I.W.; Esposito, R.M.; Tyree, M.; Spaulding, S.A. A diatom voucher flora from selected southeast rivers (USA). Phytotaxa 2017, 332, 101–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hamilton, V.A.; Lee, S.S.; Rober, A.R.; Furey, P.C.; Manoylov, K.M.; Wyatt, K.H. A voucher flora of diatoms from fens in the Tanana River Floodplain, Alaska. Water 2023, 15, 2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Koizumi, I.; Irino, T.; Oba, T. Paleoceanography during the last 150 kyr off central Japan based on diatom floras. Mar. Micropaleontol. 2004, 53, 293–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Koizumi, I.; Yamamoto, H. Paleohydrography of the Kuroshio-Kuroshio Extension based on fossil diatoms. JAMSTEC Rep. Res. Dev. 2005, 1, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sediment trap deployment site in the Kuroshio Extension area (yellow circle).
Figure 1. Sediment trap deployment site in the Kuroshio Extension area (yellow circle).
Taxonomy 04 00025 g001
Figure 2. (a) Asteromphalus heptactis; (b) Spatangidium arachne; (c,d) Coscinodiscopsis jonesiana; (e) Coscinodiscus argus; (f) Coscinodiscus centralis; (g,h) Coscinodiscus cf. marginatus; (i) Coscinodiscus radiatus; (j) Coscinodiscus gigas; (k) Stellarima stellaris; (l,m) Actinoptychus senarius. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 2. (a) Asteromphalus heptactis; (b) Spatangidium arachne; (c,d) Coscinodiscopsis jonesiana; (e) Coscinodiscus argus; (f) Coscinodiscus centralis; (g,h) Coscinodiscus cf. marginatus; (i) Coscinodiscus radiatus; (j) Coscinodiscus gigas; (k) Stellarima stellaris; (l,m) Actinoptychus senarius. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g002
Figure 3. (a) Actinocyclus octonarius; (b) Actinocyclus ochotensis; (c) Actinocyclus curvatulus; (d,e) Actinocyclus iraidae; (f,g) Azpeitia neocrenulata; (h,i) Azpeitia nodulifera; (j,k) Roperia tesselata. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 3. (a) Actinocyclus octonarius; (b) Actinocyclus ochotensis; (c) Actinocyclus curvatulus; (d,e) Actinocyclus iraidae; (f,g) Azpeitia neocrenulata; (h,i) Azpeitia nodulifera; (j,k) Roperia tesselata. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g003
Figure 4. (a) Proboscia indica; (b) Pseudosolenia calcar-avis; (ce) Rhizosolenia bergonii; (f,g) Rhizosolenia hebetata f. semispina; (h) Rhizosolenia imbricata; (i) Rhizosolenia styliformis; (j) Sundstroemia pungens. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 4. (a) Proboscia indica; (b) Pseudosolenia calcar-avis; (ce) Rhizosolenia bergonii; (f,g) Rhizosolenia hebetata f. semispina; (h) Rhizosolenia imbricata; (i) Rhizosolenia styliformis; (j) Sundstroemia pungens. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g004
Figure 5. (a) Lauderia annulata; (b,c) Detonula confervacea; (d) Planktoniella blanda; (e) Planktoniella sol; (fj) Shionodiscus oestrupii var. oestrupii; (k) Shionodiscus cf. oestrupii var. venrickae; (l) Shionodiscus aff. poroirregulatus; (m) Takanoa bingensis; (n,o) Thalassiosira dioporocyclus; (p,q) Thalassiosira ferelineata; (rt) Thalassiosira lineata. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 5. (a) Lauderia annulata; (b,c) Detonula confervacea; (d) Planktoniella blanda; (e) Planktoniella sol; (fj) Shionodiscus oestrupii var. oestrupii; (k) Shionodiscus cf. oestrupii var. venrickae; (l) Shionodiscus aff. poroirregulatus; (m) Takanoa bingensis; (n,o) Thalassiosira dioporocyclus; (p,q) Thalassiosira ferelineata; (rt) Thalassiosira lineata. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g005
Figure 6. (ad) Thalassiosira sacketii; (e,f) Thalassiosira symmetrica; (g) Thalassiosira subtilis; (h) Thalassiosira tenera; (i) Lithodesmium variabile; (j) Cerataulina pelagica; (k,l) Hemiaulus sinensis; (m) Eucampia ornuta. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 6. (ad) Thalassiosira sacketii; (e,f) Thalassiosira symmetrica; (g) Thalassiosira subtilis; (h) Thalassiosira tenera; (i) Lithodesmium variabile; (j) Cerataulina pelagica; (k,l) Hemiaulus sinensis; (m) Eucampia ornuta. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g006
Figure 7. (a,b) Bacteriastrum elongatum; (ce) Bacteriastrum furcatum. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 7. (a,b) Bacteriastrum elongatum; (ce) Bacteriastrum furcatum. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g007
Figure 8. (a) Chaetoceros affinis; (b) Chaetoceros atlanticus; (c) Chaetoceros didymus; (d) Chaetoceros eibenii; (e) Chaetoceros messanensis; (f) Chaetoceros peruvianus; (g) Chaetoceros radicans. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 8. (a) Chaetoceros affinis; (b) Chaetoceros atlanticus; (c) Chaetoceros didymus; (d) Chaetoceros eibenii; (e) Chaetoceros messanensis; (f) Chaetoceros peruvianus; (g) Chaetoceros radicans. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g008
Figure 9. (ac) Lioloma pacificum; (d,e) Thalassionema bacillare; (fj) Thalassionema frauenfeldii; (km) Thalassionema nitzschioides var. nitzschoides; (n) Thalassionema nitzschioides var. parva; (o,p) Thalassionema kuroshioensis. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 9. (ac) Lioloma pacificum; (d,e) Thalassionema bacillare; (fj) Thalassionema frauenfeldii; (km) Thalassionema nitzschioides var. nitzschoides; (n) Thalassionema nitzschioides var. parva; (o,p) Thalassionema kuroshioensis. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g009
Figure 10. (ad) Navicula cf. transitantoides; (e,f) Pleurosigma directum; (g) Pleurosigma diversestriatum; (h,i) Alveus marinus; (j,k) Fragilariopsis doliolus; (l) Fragilariopsis aff. oceanica; (m,n) Neodenticula seminae; (os) Nitzschia bicapitata; (t,u) Nitzschia interrruptestriata; (v,w) Nitzschia kolaczeckii; (x) Nitzschia sicula var. sicula; (yaa) Nitzschia sicula var. bicuneata; (ab,ac) Psammodictyon sp.; (ad) Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides; (ae,af) Tryblionella coarctata. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 10. (ad) Navicula cf. transitantoides; (e,f) Pleurosigma directum; (g) Pleurosigma diversestriatum; (h,i) Alveus marinus; (j,k) Fragilariopsis doliolus; (l) Fragilariopsis aff. oceanica; (m,n) Neodenticula seminae; (os) Nitzschia bicapitata; (t,u) Nitzschia interrruptestriata; (v,w) Nitzschia kolaczeckii; (x) Nitzschia sicula var. sicula; (yaa) Nitzschia sicula var. bicuneata; (ab,ac) Psammodictyon sp.; (ad) Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides; (ae,af) Tryblionella coarctata. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Taxonomy 04 00025 g010
Figure 11. (a) Asteromphalus heptactis; (b) Actinocyclus iraidae; (c) Minidiscus trioculatus; (d) Shionodiscus trifultus; (e,f) Shionodiscus variantus; (g,h) Thalassiosira anguste-lineata; (i) Thalassiosira diporocyclus; (j) Thalassiosira mendiolana; (k,l) Thalassiosira punctifera. Scale bars = 10 µm ((a,e,g,k,l)), 5 µm ((b,d,hj)), 1 µm ((c,f)).
Figure 11. (a) Asteromphalus heptactis; (b) Actinocyclus iraidae; (c) Minidiscus trioculatus; (d) Shionodiscus trifultus; (e,f) Shionodiscus variantus; (g,h) Thalassiosira anguste-lineata; (i) Thalassiosira diporocyclus; (j) Thalassiosira mendiolana; (k,l) Thalassiosira punctifera. Scale bars = 10 µm ((a,e,g,k,l)), 5 µm ((b,d,hj)), 1 µm ((c,f)).
Taxonomy 04 00025 g011
Figure 12. (a,b) Neodelphineis indica; (c,d) Nitzschi bicapitata; (e) Nitzschia bifurcata. (f) Psaamodictyon sp. Scale bars = 10 µm ((b)), 5 µm ((a)), 1 µm ((cf)).
Figure 12. (a,b) Neodelphineis indica; (c,d) Nitzschi bicapitata; (e) Nitzschia bifurcata. (f) Psaamodictyon sp. Scale bars = 10 µm ((b)), 5 µm ((a)), 1 µm ((cf)).
Taxonomy 04 00025 g012
Table 1. List of diatoms and the currents associated with their occurrences.
Table 1. List of diatoms and the currents associated with their occurrences.
TaxaKuroshioOyashioUncertain
Subphylum Coscinodiscophytina
 Class Coscinodiscaceae
  Subclass Coscinodiscophycidae
   Order Asterolamprales
    Family Asterolampraceae
     Genus Asteromphalus
       Asteromphalus flabellatus+
       Asteromphalus heptactis +
     Genus Spatangidium
       Spatangidium arachne+
   Order Coscinodiscales
    Family Coscinodiscaceae
     Genus Coscinodiscopsis
       Coscinodiscopsis jonesiana+
     Genus Coscinodiscus
       Coscinodiscus argus +
       Coscinodiscus centralis+
       Coscinodiscus gigas+
       Coscinodiscus cf. marginatus +
       Coscinodiscus radiatus +
    Family Heliopeltaceae
     Genus Actinoptychus
       Actinoptychus senarius+
    Family Hemidiscaceae
     Genus Actinocyclus
       Actinocyclus curvatulus +
       Actinocyclus iraidae +
       Actinocyclus ochotensis +
       Actinocyclus octonarius +
     Genus Azpeitia
       Azpeitia neocrenulata+
       Azpeitia nodulifera+
     Genus Roperia
       Roperia tesselata+
   Order Stellarimales
    Family Stellarimaceae
     Genus Stellarima
       Stellarima stellaris+
Subphylum Rhizosoleniophytina
 Class Rhizosoleniophyceae
   Order Rhizosoleniales
    Family Rhizosoleniaceae
     Genus Pseudosolenia
       Pseudosolenia calcar-avis+
     Genus Rhizosolenia
       Rhizosolenia bergonii+
       Rhizosolenia hebetata f. semispina +
       Rhizosolenia imbricata+
       Rhizosolenia styliformis +
     Genus Sundstroemia
       Sundstroemia pungens+
Subphylum Probosciophytina
 Class Probosciophyceae
   Order Probosciales
    Family Probosciaceae
     Genus Proboscia
       Proboscia indica+
Subphylum Bacillariophytina
 Class Mediophyceae
  Subclass Thalassiosirophycidae
   Order Thalassiosirales
    Family Lauderiaceae
     Genus Lauderia
       Lauderia annulata+
    Family Thalassiosiraceae
     Genus Detonula
       Detonula confervacea +
     Genus Minidiscus
       Minidiscus trioculatus +
     Genus Planktoniella
       Planktoniella blanda+
       Planktoniella sol+
     Genus Shionodiscus
       Shionodiscus oestrupii var. oestrupii+
       Shionodiscus oestrupii var. venrickae+
       Shionodiscus poro-irregulatus +
       Shionodiscus trifultus +
       Shionodiscus variantus +
     Genus Takanoa
       Takanoa bingensis +
     Genus Thalassiosira
       Thalassiosira anguste-lineata +
       Thalassiosira diporocyclus+
       Thalassiosira ferelineata+
       Thalassiosira lineata+
       Thalassiosira mendiolana+
       Thalassiosira punctifera+
       Thalassiosira sacketii+
       Thalassiosira subtilis+
       Thalassiosira symmetrica+
       Thalassiosira tenera+
  Subclass Lithodesmiophycidae
   Order Lithodesmiales
    Family Lithodesmiaceae
     Genus Lithodesmium
       Lithodesmium variabile +
  Subclass Chaetocerotophycidae
   Order Chaetocerotales
    Family Chaetocerotaceae
     Genus Bacteriastrum
       Bacteriastrum elongatum+
       Bacteriastrum furcatum+
     Genus Chaetoceros
       Chaetoceros affinis+
       Chaetoceros atlanticus +
       Chaetoceros didymus+
       Chaetoceros eibenii+
       Chaetoceros messanensis+
       Chaetoceros peruvianus+
       Chaetoceros radicans +
   Order Hemiaulales
    Family Hemiaulaceae
     Genus Cerataulina
       Cerataulina pelagica+
     Genus Eucampia
       Eucampia cornuta+
     Genus Hemiaulus
       Hemiaulus sinensis+
 Class Bacillariophyceae
  Subclass Fragilariophycidae
   Order Thalassionematales
    Family Thalassionemataceae
     Genus Lioloma
       Lioloma pacificum+
     Genus Thalassionema
       Thalassionema bacillare+
       Thalassionema frauenfeldi+
       Thalassionema kuroshioensis+
       Thalassionema nitzschioides var. nitzschioides+
       Thalassionema nitzschioides var. parva+
  Subclass Urneidophycidae
   Order Rhaphoneidales
    Family Rhaphoneidaceae
     Genus Neodelphineis
       Neodelphineis indica+
  Subclass Bacillariophycidae
   Order Naviculales
    Family Naviculaceae
     Genus Navicula
       Navicula cf. transistantioides +
    Family Pleurosigmataceae
     Genus Pleurosigma
       Pleurosigma directum +
       Pleurosigma diversestriatum+
   Order Bacillariales
    Family Bacillariaceae
     Genus Alveus
       Alveus marinus+
     Genus Fragilariopsis
       Fragilariopsis aff. oceanica +
       Fragilariopsis doliolus+
     Genus Neodenticula
       Neodenticula seminae +
     Genus Nitzschia
       Nitzschia bicapitata+
       Nitzschia bifurcata+
       Nitzschia interruptestriata+
       Nitzschia kolaczeckii+
       Nitzschia sicula var. sicula+
       Nitzschia sicula var. bicuneata+
     Genus Psammodictyon
       Psammodictyon sp. +
     Genus Pseudo-nitzschia
       Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides +
     Genus Tryblionella
       Tryblionella coarctata+
561214
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, J.S.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, K.-W.; Ha, H.J.; Kim, Y.J. Diatom Flora from Time-Series Sediment Trap in the Kuroshio Extension Region of the Northwestern Pacific. Taxonomy 2024, 4, 507-547. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4030025

AMA Style

Park JS, Kim HJ, Lee K-W, Ha HJ, Kim YJ. Diatom Flora from Time-Series Sediment Trap in the Kuroshio Extension Region of the Northwestern Pacific. Taxonomy. 2024; 4(3):507-547. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4030025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Joon Sang, Hyung Jeek Kim, Kyun-Woo Lee, Hyun Ju Ha, and Yun Jae Kim. 2024. "Diatom Flora from Time-Series Sediment Trap in the Kuroshio Extension Region of the Northwestern Pacific" Taxonomy 4, no. 3: 507-547. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4030025

APA Style

Park, J. S., Kim, H. J., Lee, K. -W., Ha, H. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2024). Diatom Flora from Time-Series Sediment Trap in the Kuroshio Extension Region of the Northwestern Pacific. Taxonomy, 4(3), 507-547. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4030025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop