Autopsy by Imaging: The Last 10 Years
Abstract
:1. Introduction
The Challenges of Traditional Autopsies
2. General Overview of Imaging in Autopsy
2.1. PMCT
2.2. PMMR
2.3. Overview of the VA Procedure
2.4. VA vs. TA
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. VA: The Strengths
4.2. VA: The Weaknesses
5. Discussion
5.1. Sensitivity vs. Specificity
5.2. The Current Potential Uses for VA
5.3. The Challenges of VA
5.4. Limitations of This Review
6. Emerging Techniques for VA
6.1. PM Angiography
6.2. Pulmonary Emboli—A Major Pitfall of VA
6.3. VA-Guided Biopsies
6.4. PM Micro-CT
6.5. PM Ultrasonography
6.6. Toxicological Deaths
7. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Burton, J.L.; Kitsanta, P. Daily application of post-mortem computed tomography digital autopsy in a public mortuary. Diagn. Histopathol. 2020, 26, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herath, J.C.; Herath, S.O. Is it time for targeted and minimally invasive post-mortem examination using total body computed tomography in a medicolegal autopsy? Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2021, 17, 175–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewis, C.; Latif, Z.; Hill, M.; Riddington, M.; Lakhanpaul, M.; Arthurs, O.J.; Hutchinson, J.C.; Chitty, L.S.; Sebire, N.J. “We might get a lot more families who will agree”: Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wagensveld, I.M.; Weustink, A.C.; Kors, J.A.; Blokker, B.M.; Hunink, M.G.M.; Oosterhuis, J.W. Effect of minimally invasive autopsy and ethnic background on acceptance of clinical postmortem investigation in adults. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutty, G.N.; Rutty, J.E. Perceptions of near virtual autopsies. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2011, 18, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patowary, A. The fourth incision: A cosmetic autopsy incision technique. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2010, 31, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norberti, N.; Tonelli, P.; Giaconi, C.; Nardi, C.; Focardi, M.; Nesi, G.; Miele, V.; Colagrande, S. State of the art in post-mortem computed tomography: A review of current literature. Virchows Arch. 2019, 475, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ukpo, O.; Boger, D. Chapter 4—The role of virtual autopsy and use of a CT scanner in medico-legal death investigations. In Multidisciplinary Medico-Legal Death Investigation: Role of Consultants; Sathyavagiswaran, L., Rogers, C.B., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2018; pp. 69–73. [Google Scholar]
- Moskała, A.; Woźniak, K.; Kluza, P.; Romaszko, K.; Lopatin, O. The importance of post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in confrontation with conventional forensic autopsy of victims of motorcycle accidents. Leg. Med. 2016, 18, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolliger, S.A.; Thali, M.J. Imaging and virtual autopsy: Looking back and forward. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvarna, S.K.; Kitsanta, P.; Burton, J.L. The effects of postmortem CT scanning all cases entering a UK public mortuary: A 3-month pilot. J. Clin. Pathol. 2017, 70, 903–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.P.T.; Traill, Z.C.; Roberts, I.S.D. Post-mortem imaging in adults. Diagn. Histopathol. 2018, 24, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendon Mosque & Islamic Centre. CT Scan. Available online: https://hendonmosque.co.uk/funeral-services/ct-scan/ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Haringey Council. Oxford Minimally Invasive Autopsy Service. Available online: https://www.haringey.gov.uk/sites/haringeygovuk/files/oxford_mia_service.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Watts, G. Imaging the dead. Br. Med. J. 2010, 341, 1130–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Femia, G.; Langlois, N.; Raleigh, J.; Gray, B.; Othman, F.; Perumal, S.R.; Semsarian, C.; Puranik, R. Comparison of conventional autopsy with post-mortem magnetic resonance, computed tomography in determining the cause of unexplained death. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2021, 17, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dedouit, F.; Campana, L.; Uldin, T.; Grabherr, S. Post-mortem forensic imaging. In P5 Medicine and Justice: Innovation, Unitariness and Evidence; Ferrara, S.D., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 544–559. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, S.; Ebner, L.; Flach, P.; Brodhage, R.; Bolliger, S.A.; Christe, A.; Thali, M.J. Postmortem whole-body MRI in traumatic causes of death. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012, 199, 1186–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michaud, K.; Genet, P.; Sabatasso, S.; Grabherr, S. Postmortem imaging as a complementary tool for the investigation of cardiac death. Forensic Sci. Res. 2019, 4, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- O’Donnell, C.; Woodford, N. Post-mortem radiology—A new sub-speciality? Clin. Radiol. 2008, 63, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvarna, S.K. Teaching and examining for post-mortem CT-scanned autopsies. Diagn. Histopathol. 2020, 26, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lancashire County Council. Non-Invasive Post-Mortem Examination. Available online: https://www.lancashire.gov.uk/births-marriages-and-deaths/deaths/coroners/non-invasive-post-mortem-examination/ (accessed on 12 September 2022).
- Graziani, G.; Tal, S.; Adelman, A.; Kugel, C.; Bdolah-Abram, T.; Krispin, A. Usefulness of unenhanced post mortem computed tomography—Findings in postmortem non-contrast computed tomography of the head, neck and spine compared to traditional medicolegal autopsy. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2018, 55, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, I.S.D.; Benamore, R.E.; Benbow, E.W.; Lee, S.H.; Harris, J.N.; Jackson, A.; Mallett, S.; Patankar, T.; Peebles, C.; Roobottom, C.; et al. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: A validation study. Lancet 2012, 379, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. The Coroner’s Autopsy: Do We Deserve Better? A Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. Available online: http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2006Report/Downloads/Coronial Autopsy Report 2006.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Gov.uk. National Statistics: Coroners Statistics 2020: England and Wales. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/coroners-statistics-2020/coroners-statistics-2020-england-andwales#:~:text=There%20were%2079%2C357%20post%2Dmortem,2%2C715%20(3%25)%20from%202019 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- The Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines for Post-Mortem Cross-Sectional Imaging in Adults for Non-Forensic Deaths July 2021. Available online: https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/666dbf95-de06-44ad-89c3b4e5f1ceab79/G182-Guidelines-for-post-mortem-cross-sectional-imagingFor-Publication.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Burton, J.L. Health and safety at necropsy. J. Clin. Pathol. 2003, 56, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutty, G.N.; Morgan, B.; Robinson, C.; Raj, V.; Pakkal, M.; Amoroso, J.; Visser, T.; Saunders, S.; Biggs, M.; Hollingbury, F.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem CT with targeted coronary angiography versus autopsy for coroner-requested post-mortem investigations: A prospective, masked, comparison study. Lancet 2017, 390, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mentink, M.G.; Latten, B.G.H.; Bakers, F.C.H.; Mihl, C.; Rennenberg, R.J.M.W.; Kubat, B.; Hofman, P.A.M. Clinical relevance of unexpected findings of post-mortem computed tomography in hospitalized patients: An observational study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kasahara, S.; Makino, Y.; Hayakawa, M.; Yajima, D.; Ito, H.; Iwase, H. Diagnosable and non-diagnosable causes of death by postmortem computed tomography: A review of 339 forensic cases. Leg. Med. 2012, 14, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Paolo, M.; Maiese, A.; dell’Aquila, M.; Filomena, C.; Turco, S.; Giaconi, C.; Turillazzi, E. Role of post mortem CT (PMCT) in high energy traumatic deaths. Clin. Ther. 2020, 171, 490–500. [Google Scholar]
- Legrand, L.; Delabarde, T.; Souillard-Scemama, R.; Sec, I.; Plu, I.; Laborie, J.-M.; Delannoy, Y.; Hamza, L.; Taccoen, M.; de Jong, L.; et al. Comparison between postmortem computed tomography and autopsy in the detection of traumatic head injuries. J. Neuroradiol. 2020, 47, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hueck, U.; Muggenthaler, H.; Hubig, M.; Heinrich, A.; Güttler, F.; Wagner, R.; Mall, G.; Teichgräber, U. Forensic postmortem computed tomography in suspected unnatural adult deaths. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020, 132, 109297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grabherr, S.; Heinemann, A.; Vogel, H.; Rutty, G.; Morgan, B.; Woźniak, K.; Dedouit, F.; Fischer, F.; Lochner, S.; Wittig, H.; et al. Postmortem CT angiography compared with autopsy: A forensic multicenter study. Radiology 2018, 288, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adelman, A.; Vasserman, M.; Graziani, G.; Kugel, C.; Meir, K.; Bdolah-Abram, T.; Krispin, A. Post-mortem computed tomography compared to medico-legal autopsy—Pathologies in the torso and limbs. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging 2018, 12, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makino, Y.; Yokota, H.; Nakatani, E.; Yajima, D.; Inokuchi, G.; Motomura, A.; Chiba, F.; Torimitsu, S.; Uno, T.; Iwase, H. Differences between postmortem CT and autopsy in death investigation of cervical spine injuries. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 281, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leth, P.M.; Struckmann, H.; Lauritsen, J. Interobserver agreement of the injury diagnoses obtained by postmortem computed tomography of traffic fatality victims and a comparison with autopsy results. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 225, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, I.S.D.; Traill, Z.C. Minimally invasive autopsy employing post-mortem CT and targeted coronary angiography: Evaluation of its application to a routine Coronial service. Histopathology 2014, 64, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Le Blanc-Louvry, I.; Thureau, S.; Duval, C.; Papin-Lefebvre, F.; Thiebot, J.; Dacher, J.N.; Gricourt, C.; Touré, E.; Proust, B. Post-mortem computed tomography compared to forensic autopsy findings: A French experience. Eur. Radiol. 2013, 23, 1829–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deininger-Czermak, E.; Heimer, J.; Tappero, C.; Thali, M.J.; Gascho, D. The added value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in cases of hanging compared to postmortem computed tomography and autopsy. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2020, 16, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daly, B.; Abboud, S.; Ali, Z.; Sliker, C.; Fowler, D. Comparison of whole-body post mortem 3D CT and autopsy evaluation in accidental blunt force traumatic death using the abbreviated injury scale classification. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 225, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schulze, C.; Hoppe, H.; Schweitzer, W.; Schwendener, N.; Grabherr, S.; Jackowski, C. Rib fractures at postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) validated against the autopsy. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 233, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagensveld, I.M.; Blokker, B.M.; Wielopolski, P.A.; Renken, N.S.; Krestin, G.P.; Hunink, M.G.; Oosterhuis, J.W.; Weustink, A.C. Total-body CT and MR features of postmortem change in in-hospital deaths. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Serinellii, S.; Richardson, T.E.; Destian, S.; Mirchia, K.; Williams, M.; Medina-Perez, M.; Gitto, L. Head and brain postmortem computed tomography—Autopsy correlation in hospital deaths. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2020, 41, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willaume, T.; Farrugia, A.; Keiffer, E.-M.; Charton, J.; Geraut, A.; Berthelon, L.; Bierry, G.; Raul, J.-S. The benefits and pitfalls of post-mortem computed tomography in forensic external examination: A retrospective study of 145 cases. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 286, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez, A.C.; Mancini, J.; Tuchtan-Torrents, L.; Gach, P.; Bartoli, C.; Desfeux, J.; Piercecchi, M.D.; Gorincour, G. Diagnostic value of unenhanced postmortem computed tomography in the detection of traumatic abdominal injuries. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2018, 99, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedford, P.J. Routine CT scan combined with preliminary examination as a new method in determining the need for autopsy. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2012, 8, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Femia, G.; Semsarian, C.; Langlois, N.; McGuire, M.; Raleigh, J.; Taylor, A.; Puranik, R. Post-mortem imaging adjudicated sudden death: Causes and controversies. Heart Lung Circ. 2019, 28, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Westphal, S.E.; Aptizsch, J.; Penzkofer, T.; Mahnken, A.H.; Knüche, R. Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: Feasibility in clinical autopsies. Virchows Arch. 2012, 461, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jakobsen, L.K.; Lundemose, S.; Banner, J.; Lynnerup, N.; Jacobsen, C. Forensic postmortem computed tomography: Volumetric measurement of the heart and liver. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2016, 12, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwendener, N.; Jackowski, C.; Persson, A.; Warntjes, M.J.; Schuster, F.; Riva, F.; Zech, W.-D. Detection and differentiation of early acute and following age stages of myocardial infarction with quantitative post-mortem cardiac 1.5 T MR. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 270, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sonnemans, L.J.; Kubat, B.; Prokop, M.; Klein, W.M. Can virtual autopsy with postmortem CT improve clinical diagnosis of cause of death? A retrospective observational cohort study in a Dutch tertiary referral centre. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e018834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inai, K.; Noriki, S.; Kinoshita, K.; Sakai, T.; Kimura, H.; Nishijima, A.; Iwasaki, H.; Naiki, H. Postmortem CT is more accurate than clinical diagnosis for identifying the immediate cause of death in hospitalized patients: A prospective autopsy-based study. Virchows Arch. 2016, 469, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lorenzen, J.; Schenzer-Hoffmann, E.; Braun, C.; Lorenzen, M.; Anders, S.; Adam, G.; Püschel, K. Determination of cause of death with blinded coronal whole-body MRI compared to forensic examination. Rechtsmedizin 2019, 29, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jalalzadeh, H.; Giannakopoulos, G.F.; Berger, F.H.; Fronczek, J.; van de Goot, F.R.W.; Reijnders, U.J.; Zuidema, W.P. Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims—A systematic review. Forensic Sci. Int. 2015, 257, 29–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondello, C.; Baldino, G.; Bottari, A.; Sapienza, D.; Perri, F.; Argo, A.; Asmundo, A.; Spagnolo, E.V. The role of PMCT for the assessment of the cause of death in natural disaster (landslide and flood): A Sicilian experience. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2022, 136, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.J.; Barry, N.; Akusoba, I.; Hon, H.H.; Cohen, M.S.; Shukla, P.; Cipolla, J.; Stawicki, S.P.; Hoey, B.A. Traditional autopsy versus computed tomography imaging autopsy in trauma: A case of “synergistic disagreement”. Surgery 2016, 160, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worasuwannarak, W.; Peonim, V.; Srisont, S.; Udnoon, J.; Chudoung, U.; Kaewlai, R. Comparison of postmortem CT and conventional autopsy in five trauma fatalities. Forensic Imaging 2020, 22, 200389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruder, T.D.; Thali, M.J.; Hatch, G.M. Essentials of forensic post-mortem MR imaging in adults. Br. J. Radiol. 2014, 87, 20130567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Deininger-Czermak, E.; Heimer, J.; Tappero, C.; Thali, M.J.; Gascho, D. Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Postmortem Computed Tomography in Ligature and Manual Strangulation. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2020, 41, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ampanozi, G.; Flach, P.M.; Ruder, T.D.; Filograna, L.; Schweitzer, W.; Thali, M.J.; Ebert, L.C. Differentiation of hemopericardium due to ruptured myocardial infarction or aortic dissection on unenhanced postmortem computed tomography. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2017, 13, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rutty, G.N.; Morgan, B.; Germerott, T.; Thali, M.; Athurs, O. Ventilated post-mortem computed tomography—A historical review. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging. 2016, 4, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morgan, B.; Rutty, G.N. How does post-mortem imaging compare to autopsy, is this a relevant question? J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging 2016, 4, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kniep, I.; Heinemann, A.; Edler, C.; Sperhake, J.P.; Püschel, K.; Ondruschka, B.; Schröder, A.S. COVID-19 lungs in post-mortem computed tomography. Rechtsmedizin 2021, 31, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ducloyer, M.; Gaborit, B.; Toquet, C.; Castain, L.; Bal, A.; Arrigoni, P.P.; Lecomte, R.; Clement, R.; Sagan, C. Complete post-mortem data in a fatal case of COVID-19: Clinical, radiological and pathological correlations. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 134, 2209–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helmrich, E.; Decker, L.; Adolphi, N.; Makino, Y. Postmortem CT lung findings in decedents with Covid-19: A review of 14 decedents and potential triage implications. Forensic Imaging 2020, 23, 200419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filograna, L.; Grassi, S.; Manenti, G.; Di Donna, C.; Tatulli, D.; Nardoni, F.; Masini, V.; Ausania, F.; Grassi, V.M.; Floris, R.; et al. Postmortem CT pulmonary findings in SARS-CoV-2-positive cases: Correlation with lung histopathological findings and autopsy results. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2022, 136, 1407–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okumura, M.; Usumoto, Y.; Tsuji, A.; Kudo, K.; Ikeda, N. Analysis of postmortem changes in internal organs and gases using computed tomography data. Leg. Med. 2017, 25, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takahashi, N.; Yajima, K.; Otaki, M.; Yoshikawa, Y.; Ishihara, A.; Sato, Y.; Higuchi, T.; Takatsuka, H. Postmortem volume change of the spleen and kidney on early postmortem computed tomography: Comparison with antemortem computed tomography. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2019, 37, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gonoi, W.; Watanabe, Y.; Shirota, G.; Abe, H.; Okuma, H.; Shintani-Domoto, Y.; Tajima, T.; Fukayama, M.; Abe, O.; Ishida, M. Pulmonary postmortem computed tomography of bacterial pneumonia and pulmonary edema in patients following non-traumatic in-hospital death. Leg. Med. 2020, 45, 101716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirota, G.; Gonoi, W.; Ikemura, M.; Ishida, M.; Shintani, Y.; Abe, H.; Fukayama, M.; Higashida, T.; Okuma, H.; Abe, O. The pseudo-SAH sign: An imaging pitfall in postmortem computed tomography. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2017, 131, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sapienza, D.; Cicero, G.; Asmundo, A.; Mondello, C.; Spagnolo, E.V.; Bottari, A.; Gaeta, M. Intraosseous gas distribution as a marker of postmortem interval. Forensic Imaging 2020, 23, 200414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, T.; O’Donnell, C. The artefacts of death: CT post-mortem findings. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2017, 62, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rutty, G.N.; Morgan, B. Future evidence in forensic imaging. In P5 Medicine and Justice: Innovation, Unitariness and Evidence; Ferrara, S.D., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 576–585. [Google Scholar]
- Flach, P.M.; Thali, M.J.; Germerott, T. Times have changed! forensic radiology-a new challenge for radiology and forensic pathology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014, 202, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henningsen, M.J.; Harving, M.L.; Jacobsen, C.; Villa, C. Fractures of the neuro-cranium: Sensitivity and specificity of post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2022, 136, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germerott, T.; Flach, P.M.; Preiss, U.S.; Ross, S.G.; Thali, M.J. Postmortem ventilation: A new method for improved detection of pulmonary pathologies in forensic imaging. Leg. Med. 2012, 14, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentink, M.G.; Bakers, F.C.H.; Mihl, C.; Lahaye, M.J.; Rennenberg, R.J.M.W.; Latten, B.G.H.; Kubat, B.; Hofman, P.A.M. Introduction of postmortem CT increases the postmortem examination rate without negatively impacting the rate of traditional autopsy in daily practice: An implementation study. J. Clin. Pathol. 2021, 74, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basso, C.; Aguilera, B.; Banner, J.; Cohle, S.; d’Amati, G.; Henriques de Gouveia, R.; di Gioia, C.; Fabre, A.; Gallagher, P.J.; Leone, O.; et al. Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Virchows Arch. 2017, 471, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Marco, E.; Vacchiano, G.; Frati, P.; la Russa, R.; Santurro, A.; Scopetti, M.; Guglielmi, G.; Fineschi, V. Evolution of post-mortem coronary imaging: From selective coronary arteriography to post-mortem CT-angiography and beyond. La Radiol. Med. 2018, 123, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michaud, K.; Grabherr, S.; Jackowski, C.; Bollmann, M.D.; Doenz, F.; Mangin, P. Postmortem imaging of sudden cardiac death. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2013, 128, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Franckenberg, S.; Flach, P.M.; Gascho, D.; Thali, M.J.; Ross, S.G. Postmortem computed tomography-angiography (PMCTA) in decomposed bodies—A feasibility study. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging 2015, 3, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grabherr, S.; Grimm, J.; Dominguez, A.; Vanhaebost, J.; Mangin, P. Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br. J. Radiol. 2014, 87, 20130488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Von Both, I.; Bruni, S.G.; Herath, J.C. Differentiation of antemortem pulmonary thromboembolism and postmortem clot with unenhanced MRI: A case report. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2018, 14, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, M.P.; Bedford, P.; Baber, Y. Can forensic pathologists diagnose pulmonary thromboembolism on postmortem computed tomography pulmonary angiography? Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2014, 35, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Z.L.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Liu, N.-G.; Wan, L.; Huang, P.; Li, Z.-D.; Zou, D.-H.; Dong, H.-W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.-H.; et al. Pulmonary PMCT angiography by right ventricle cardiac puncture: A novel, promising approach for investigating pulmonary thromboembolism. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2021, 135, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, M.; Bigé, N.; Maury, E.; Arrivé, L. Pulmonary embolism diagnosed by contrast-enhanced virtopsy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 189, 358–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackowski, C.; Grabherr, S.; Schwendener, N. Pulmonary thrombembolism as cause of death on unenhanced postmortem 3T MRI. Eur. Radiol. 2013, 23, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latten, B.G.H.; Bakers, F.C.H.; Hofman, P.A.M.; Hausen, A.Z.; Kubat, B. The needle in the haystack: Histology of post-mortem computed tomography guided biopsies versus autopsy derived tissue. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 302, 109882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blokker, B.M.; Weustink, A.C.; Wagensveld, I.M.; von der Thüsen, J.H.; Pezzato, A.; Dammers, R.; Bakker, J.; Renken, N.S.; den Bakker, M.A.; van Kemenade, F.J.; et al. Conventional autopsy versus minimally invasive autopsy with postmortem MRI, CT, and CT-guided biopsy: Comparison of diagnostic performance. Radiology 2018, 289, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Baier, W.; Mangham, C.; Warnett, J.M.; Payne, M.; Painter, M.; Williams, M.A. Using histology to evaluate micro-CT findings of trauma in three post-mortem samples—First steps towards method validation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 297, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hutchinson, J.C.; Shelmerdine, S.C.; Simcock, I.C.; Sebire, N.J.; Arthurs, O.J. Early clinical applications for imaging at microscopic detail: Microfocus computed tomography (micro-CT). Br. J. Radiol. 2017, 90, 20170113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orhan, K. Introduction to micro-CT imaging. In Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) in Medicine and Engineering; Orhan, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Kanchan, T.; Shrestha, R.; Krishan, K. Post-mortem ultrasonography: A safer alternative to autopsies in COVID-19 deaths. J. Ultrasound 2021, 24, 577–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchigasaki, S. Postmortem ultrasound imaging in forensic pathology. In Forensic Pathology Reviews Volume 4; Tsokos, K., Ed.; Humana: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 405–412. [Google Scholar]
- Usui, A.; Kawasumi, Y.; Usui, K.; Ishizuka, Y.; Takahashi, K.; Funayama, M.; Saito, H. Postmortem computed tomographic analysis of death caused by oral drug intoxication. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2017, 242, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chatzaraki, V.; Heimer, J.; Thali, M.; Dally, A.; Schweitzer, W. Role of PMCT as a triage tool between external inspection and full autopsy—Case series and review. J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging. 2018, 15, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Relatively Sensitive | Relatively Non-Sensitive | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesion | PMCT | PMMR | PMCT | PMMR |
Bony injuries | ||||
General fractures | [1,9,16,23,24,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42] | [41] | ||
Rib fractures | [36,40,42,43] | [18] | ||
Free gases and fluids | ||||
Gas accumulations e.g., pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum | [9,16,23,30,31,33,34,36,38,40,42,44] | [18] | ||
Large fluid collections e.g., haemothorax, haemopericardium, ascites | [1,16,23,24,30,31,33,34,42,45,46,47,48] | [16,18,24] | ||
Small blood collections | [9,23,33,45] | |||
Cardiac findings | ||||
Aortic ruptures | [38] | |||
Aortic dissection | [1] | [16] | [16] | |
Arterial and valvular calcifications | [1,16,24,34,45,46,49] | [24,49] | ||
Structural cardiac and coronary vascular information, e.g., structural abnormalities, arterial stenoses, atherosclerosis, coronary thromboses, cardiomyopathies | [1,24,29,31,34,35,36,50,51] | [24] | ||
Myocardial infarction | [16,24,52] | [1,16,24,31,46,49,50,53,54] | ||
Myocardial fibrosis | [36] | |||
Heart failure | [34] | |||
Infective endocarditis | [1] | |||
Cardiac cause of death (without specifying) * | [46] | [55] | ||
Pulmonary findings | ||||
Pulmonary embolism | [1,16,24,29,31,39,53,54] | [16,24] | ||
Pneumonia | [1,30,46,54] | [24,29,34,39] | [24] | |
Pulmonary oedema | [1,34] | |||
Pleural effusions | [30,31,34,36,40,46] | |||
Soft tissue injuries | ||||
Visceral/soft tissue lesions | [18,24,41,44] | [9,31,32,35,36,38,40] | ||
Intramuscular haemorrhage | [18,41] | [23,36] | ||
Gastrointestinal findings | ||||
Pancreatitis | [1] | |||
Gallstones | [1] | [24] | [24] | |
Cirrhosis/fatty liver | [1] | |||
GI ulcers | [1,24] | [24] | ||
GI ischaemia | [1] | [24] | [24] | |
GI haemorrhage | [30] | [29,34] | ||
Other findings | ||||
Intracranial findings, e.g., herniations and midline shifts, tumours, infarcts, abscesses, cerebral oedema | [1,23,31,45] | [16,49] | ||
Intervertebral/spinal findings | [23] | [37] | ||
Meningitis/encephalitis | [1] | |||
Neoplasms | [1,30,45] ** | |||
Abscesses | [1] | |||
Foreign bodies | [1,34,36] | |||
Sepsis | [24,29] | [24] | ||
Intoxication | [1,31,34,40,46] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mercala, E.; Benbow, E.W. Autopsy by Imaging: The Last 10 Years. Forensic Sci. 2022, 2, 696-714. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2040052
Mercala E, Benbow EW. Autopsy by Imaging: The Last 10 Years. Forensic Sciences. 2022; 2(4):696-714. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2040052
Chicago/Turabian StyleMercala, Ellie, and Emyr Wyn Benbow. 2022. "Autopsy by Imaging: The Last 10 Years" Forensic Sciences 2, no. 4: 696-714. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2040052
APA StyleMercala, E., & Benbow, E. W. (2022). Autopsy by Imaging: The Last 10 Years. Forensic Sciences, 2(4), 696-714. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2040052