Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgment to Reviewers of Ruminants in 2021
Next Article in Special Issue
Healthy Cattle Microbiome and Dysbiosis in Diseased Phenotypes
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Effect of Artificial Rearing on Live Weight Gain and Bone Morphology of the Tibia in Lambs Prior to Weaning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bovine Rumen Microbiome: Impact of DNA Extraction Methods and Comparison of Non-Invasive Sampling Sites

1
Department of Animal Science, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37077 Goettingen, Germany
2
Department of Genomic and Applied Microbiology, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37077 Goettingen, Germany
3
Center for Integrated Breeding Research, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ruminants 2022, 2(1), 112-132; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants2010007
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 20 December 2021 / Accepted: 28 December 2021 / Published: 30 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers of Ruminants 2021-2022)

Abstract

With increasing global demand for animal protein, it is very important to investigate the impact of the bovine rumen microbiome on its functional traits. In order to acquire accurate and reproducible data for this type of study, it is important to understand what factors can affect the results of microbial community analysis, and where biases can occur. This study shows the impact of different DNA extraction methods on microbial community composition. Five DNA extraction methods were used on a ruminal sample. These experiments expose a high level of variability between extraction methods in relation to the microbial communities observed. As direct access to the rumen is required, we also investigated possible alternative sampling sites that could be utilised as non-invasive indicators of the bovine rumen microbiome. Therefore, oral swabs and faecal samples were taken in addition to ruminal samples, and DNA was extracted using a single method, reducing bias, and analysed. This is a small pilot study intending to reinforce the need for a universally used methodology for rumen microbiome analysis. Although alternative sampling points can indicate some of the communities present in the rumen, this must be approached cautiously, as there are limits to the depth of community analysis possible without direct rumen sampling.
Keywords: 16S rRNA; 18S rRNA; DNA extraction; microbiome; rumen 16S rRNA; 18S rRNA; DNA extraction; microbiome; rumen

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mott, A.C.; Schneider, D.; Hünerberg, M.; Hummel, J.; Tetens, J. Bovine Rumen Microbiome: Impact of DNA Extraction Methods and Comparison of Non-Invasive Sampling Sites. Ruminants 2022, 2, 112-132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants2010007

AMA Style

Mott AC, Schneider D, Hünerberg M, Hummel J, Tetens J. Bovine Rumen Microbiome: Impact of DNA Extraction Methods and Comparison of Non-Invasive Sampling Sites. Ruminants. 2022; 2(1):112-132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants2010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mott, Alexander C., Dominik Schneider, Martin Hünerberg, Jürgen Hummel, and Jens Tetens. 2022. "Bovine Rumen Microbiome: Impact of DNA Extraction Methods and Comparison of Non-Invasive Sampling Sites" Ruminants 2, no. 1: 112-132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants2010007

APA Style

Mott, A. C., Schneider, D., Hünerberg, M., Hummel, J., & Tetens, J. (2022). Bovine Rumen Microbiome: Impact of DNA Extraction Methods and Comparison of Non-Invasive Sampling Sites. Ruminants, 2(1), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants2010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop