Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming in Arid Regions of Jordan
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Location and Data
2.2. Statistical Analyses
2.3. Herd Vitality
2.4. Sustainability Evaluation
3. Results
3.1. Breeder Indicators
3.2. Economic Metrics
3.3. Herd Management
3.4. Sustainability Assessment
4. Discussion
4.1. Breeder Indicators
4.2. Economic Metrics
4.3. Herd Management
4.4. Sustainability Assessment
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Molotsi, A.H.; Dube, B.; Cloete, S.W. The Current Status of Indigenous Ovine Genetic Resources in Southern Africa and Future Sustainable Utilisation to Improve Livelihoods. Diversity 2019, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaitoun, I.S.; Tabbaa, M.J.; Bdour, S. Differentiation of native goat breeds of Jordan on the basis of morphostructural characteristics. Small Rumin. Res. 2005, 56, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iñiguez, L. Goats in resource-poor systems in the dry environments of West Asia, Central Asia and the Inter-Andean valleys. Small Rumin. Res. 2004, 51, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürsoy, O. Economics and profitability of sheep and goat production in Turkey under new support regimes and market conditions. Small Rumin. Res. 2006, 62, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abo-Shehada, M.N.; Abu-Halaweh, M.M. Flock-level seroprevalence of, and risk factors for, Neospora caninum among sheep and goats in northern Jordan. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009, 93, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaralis, K.; Smith, L.; Belanche, A.; Morin, E.; Mullender, S.; Martín-García, I.; Yañez-Ruiz, D. Developing an assessment tool to evaluate the sustainability of sheep and goat farming systems in Europe. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Informatics and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment, Chania, Greece, 21–24 September 2017; Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2030/HAICTA_2017_paper76.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2022).
- Di Trana, A.; Sepe, L.; Di Gregorio, P.; Di Napoli, M.A.; Giorgio, D.; Caputo, A.R.; Claps, S. The Role of Local Sheep and Goat Breeds and Their Products as a Tool for Sustainability and Safeguard of the Mediterranean Environment. In The Sustainability of Agro-Food and Natural Resource Systems in the Mediterranean Basin; Vastola, A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simões, J.; Abecia, J.; Cannas, A.; Delgadillo, J.; Lacasta, D.; Voigt, K.; Chemineau, P. Review: Managing sheep and goats for sustainable high yield production. Animal 2021, 15, 100293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Khaza’leh, J.M.K. Goat Farming and Breeding in Jordan; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Tabini, R.; Al-Khalidi, K.; Al-Shudiefat, M. Livestock, medicinal plants and rangeland viability in Jordan’s Badia: Through the lens of traditional and local knowledge. Pastoralism 2012, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christopher, J. An Assessment of Subsidy Removal Effects on and Future Sustainability for Livestock Sector of in the Northern Jordanian Badia. Indep. Study Proj. (ISP) Collect. 2008. Available online: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/7 (accessed on 20 October 2022).
- Haile, A.; Gizaw, S.; Getachew, T.; Mueller, J.P.; Amer, P.; Rekik, M.; Rischkowsky, B. Community-based breeding programmes are a viable solution for Ethiopian small ruminant genetic improvement but require public and private investments. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2019, 136, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kremsa, V.Š. Sustainable Management of Agricultural Resources (Agricultural Crops and Animals); Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 99–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sejian, V.; Silpa, M.V.; Lees, A.M.; Krishnan, G.; Devaraj, C.; Bagath, M.; Anisha, J.P.; Reshma Nair, M.R.; Manimaran, A.; Bhatta, R.; et al. Opportunities, Challenges, and Ecological Footprint of Sustaining Small Ruminant Production in the Changing Climate Scenario. In Agroecological Footprints Management for Sustainable Food System; Banerjee, A., Meena, R.S., Jhariya, M.K., Yadav, D.K., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariom, T.O.; Dimon, E.; Nambeye, E.; Diouf, N.S.; Adelusi, O.O.; Boudalia, S. Climate-Smart Agriculture in African Countries: A Review of Strategies and Impacts on Smallholder Farmers. Sustainability 2021, 14, 11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paraskevopoulou, C.; Theodoridis, A.; Johnson, M.; Ragkos, A.; Arguile, L.; Smith, L.; Vlachos, D.; Arsenos, G. Sustainability Assessment of Goat and Sheep Farms: A Comparison between European countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pardo, G.; Del Prado, A.; Fernández-Álvarez, J.; Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R.; Belanche, A. Influence of precision livestock farming on the environmental performance of intensive dairy goat farms. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 351, 131518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koluman, N.; Durmuş, M.; Güngör, İ. Improving reproduction and growth characteristics of indigenous goats in smallholding farming system. Ciência Rural. 2023, 54, e20230028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosgey, I.; Baker, R.; Udo, H.; Van Arendonk, J. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: A review. Small Rumin. Res. 2005, 61, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Massender, E.; Brito, L.F.; Schenkel, F.S. Sustainable Genetic Improvement in Dairy Goats. In Animal Breeding and Genetics; Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology Series; Spangler, M.L., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sejian, V.; Silpa, M.V.; Reshma Nair, M.R.; Devaraj, C.; Krishnan, G.; Bagath, M.; Chauhan, S.S.; Suganthi, R.U.; Fonseca, V.F.; König, S.; et al. Heat Stress and Goat Welfare: Adaptation and Production Considerations. Animals 2021, 11, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hunaiti Dokhi Abdel-Rahim. The Main Structure of Livestock Holdings, Characteristics and Distribution, Analysis of the Results of the Agricultural Census. College of Agriculture, Mutah University. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. 2007. Available online: http://www.dos.gov.jo/dos_home_a/main/agriculture/census/papers/paper_3.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2022).
- Al-Qinna, M.I.; Hammouri, N.A.; Obeidat, M.M.; Ahmad, F.Y. Drought analysis in Jordan under current and future climates. Clim. Change 2011, 106, 421–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awad, R.; Mohamed-Brahmi, A.; Titi, M.; Jaouad, M.; Gasmi-Boubaker, A. Assessing the small ruminant value chain in arid regions: A case study of the NorthEastern Badia Basalt Plateau in Jordan. J. Glob. Innov. Agric. Sci. 2023, 11, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide; Version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2012; Available online: https://Support.Sas.Com/En/Books.Html (accessed on 15 August 2022).
- Wade, M.J. Sexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive Success. Am. Nat. 1979, 114, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payne, R.B. Sexual Selection and Intersexual Differences in Variance of Breeding Success. Am. Nat. 1979, 114, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, L.; Tomasik, B.; Rueda, O.; Pfister, S. Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 1476–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Olde, E.M.; Bokkers, E.A.; De Boer, I.J. The Choice of the Sustainability Assessment Tool Matters: Differences in Thematic Scope and Assessment Results. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 136, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyam, Y.; Bahta, Y.; Oduniyi, O.; Matthews, N. Smallholder sheep farmers’ perception of pro-duction constraints and competitiveness strategies in South Africa. Sci. Afr. 2022, 16, e01192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koopman, J. Land grabs, government, peasant and civil society activism in the Senegal River Valley. Rev. Afr. Political Econ. 2012, 39, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Aich, A.; Waterhouse, A. Small ruminants in environmental conservation. Small Rumin. Res. 1999, 34, 271–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lianou, D.T.; Fthenakis, G.C. Dairy Sheep and Goat Farmers: Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Their Associations with Health Management and Performance on Farms. Land 2021, 10, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, D.I.; Mbap, S.T.; Naibi, S.A. Socio-Economic Characteristics of Yankasa Sheep and West African Dwarf Goat’s Farmers and Their Production Constraints in Lafia, Nigeria. Int. J. Food Agric. Vet. Sci. 2015, 5, 82–93. [Google Scholar]
- Shivakumara, C.; Reddy, B.S.; Patil, S.S. Socio-Economic Characteristics and Composition of Sheep and Goat Farming under Extensive System of Rearing. Agric. Sci. Dig. 2020, 40, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagarnaga Villegas, L.M.; Salas González, J.M.; Aguilar Ávila, J. Production Costs, Equilibrium, and Target Prices of a Goat Farm in Hidalgo, Mexico. In Proceedings of the XIV International Business and Economy Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 5–8 January 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsiouni, M.; Mamalis, S.; Aggelopoulos, S. The Effect of Financial and Non-financial Factors on the Productivity and Profitability of the Goat Industry: A Modelling Approach to Structural Equations. In Food Policy Modelling. Cooperative Management; Mattas, K., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis, C., Staboulis, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, E.; Green, M.; Lovatt, F.; Davies, P.; King, L.; Kaler, J. Use of bootstrapped, regularised regression to identify factors associated with lamb-derived revenue on commercial sheep farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 174, 104851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, M.K.; Dixit, A.K.; Roy, A.K.; Singh, S.K. Goat Rearing: A Pathway for Sustainable Livelihood Security in Bundelkhand Region. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 2013, 26. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, V.K.; Suresh, A.; Gupta, D.C.; Jakhmola, R.C. Common property resources rural livelihood and small ruminants in India: A review. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 75. Available online: https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/9466 (accessed on 2 November 2022).
- Byaruhanga, C.; Oluka, J.; Olinga, S. Socio-economic Aspects of Goat Production in a Rural Agro-pastoral System of Uganda. Univers. J. Agric. Res. 2015, 3, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, S. Economics of sheep production. Small Rumin. Res. 2009, 86, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sharafat, M.M. Government Policies Affecting the Sheep Industry in the Northern Jordanian Badia and Bedouin Responses. Ph.D. Thesis, Durham University, Durham, UK, 2001. Available online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4319/ (accessed on 13 December 2022).
- Bdour, M.A.; Zyadeen, A.F.; Alkawalit, N.T. Estimating Economic Returns of Sheep and Goat Rearing in Karak Governorate. Jordan J. Agric. Sci. 2023, 19, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dossa, L.H.; Sangaré, M.; Buerkert, A.; Schlecht, E. Production objectives and breeding practices of urban goat and sheep keepers in West Africa: Regional analysis and implications for the development of supportive breeding programs. SpringerPlus 2015, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Delgadillo, J.A.; Gelez, H.; Ungerfeld, R.; Hawken, P.A.; Martin, G.B. The ‘male effect’ in sheep and goats—Revisiting the dogs. Behav. Brain Res. 2009, 200, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifian, A.; Gantuya, B.; Wario, H.T.; Kotowski, M.A.; Barani, H.; Manzano, P.; Krätli, S.; Babai, D.; Biró, M.; Sáfián, L.; et al. Global principles in local traditional knowledge: A review of forage plant-livestock-herder interactions. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 328, 116966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farrell, L.; Creighton, P.; Bohan, A.; McGovern, F.; McHugh, N. Bio-economic modeling of sheep meat production systems with varying flock litter size using field data. Animal 2022, 16, 100640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharif, L.; Obeidat, J.M.; Al-Ani, F.K.; Vet, J. Risk Factors for Lamb and Kid Mortality in Sheep and Goat Farms in Jordan. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. 2005, 8, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
- Thiruvenkadani, A.K.; Karunanithi, K. Mortality and replacement rate of Tellicherry and its crossbred goats in Tamil Nadu. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 77, 590–594. Available online: https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/5504 (accessed on 25 December 2022).
- Dwyer, C.M. Maternal behavior and lamb survival: From neuroendocrinology to practical application. Animal 2014, 8, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Najjar, K.; Kasem, R.; Omed, H.; Salhab, S.; Al-Merestani, R.; Al-Azzawi, W.; Dawa, M.; Omed, H.; Saatcı, M. Environmental factors affecting kid mortality in Shami goats. Kafkas Univ. Vet Fak Derg. 2010, 16, 431–435. [Google Scholar]
- Roukbi, M.; Al-Omar, A.N.; Al-Najjar, K.; Salam, Z.; Al-Suleiman, H.; Mourii, M.; Jourié, S. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Chlamydophila abortus in small ruminants in some provinces in Syria. Net J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 4, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
- Snowder, G.; Stellflug, J.; Van Vleck, L. Genetic correlation of ram sexual performance with ewe reproductive traits of four sheep breeds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 88, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matika, O.; Van Wyk, J.B.; Erasmus, G.J.; Baker, R.L. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between lamb and ewe traits for the Sabi sheep of Zimbabwe. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 31, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Näsholm, A.; Danell, Ö. Genetic relationships of lamb weight, maternal ability, and mature ewe weight in Swedish fine wool sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madibela, O.R.; Mosimanyana, B.M.; Boitumelo, W.S.; Pelaelo, T.D. Effect of supplementation on reproduction of wet season kidding Tswana goats. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 32, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Josiane, M.; Gilbert, H.; Johann, D. Genetic Parameters for Growth and Kid Survival of Indigenous Goat under Smallholding System of Burundi. Animals 2019, 10, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montaldo, H.; Valencia-Posadas, M.; Wiggans, G.; Shepard, L.; Torres-Vázquez, J. Short communication: Genetic and environmental relationships between milk yield and kidding interval in dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 93, 370–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, B.U.; Herms, T.L.; Runge, M.; Ganter, M. Fever outbreak on a dairy goat farm did not result in Coxiella burnetii shedding on neighboring sheep farms—An observational study. Small Rumin. Res. 2022, 215, 106778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manyeki, J.; Kidake, B.; Mulei, B.; Kuria, S. Mortality in Galla Goat Production System in Southern Rangelands of Kenya: Levels and Predictors. J. Agric. Prod. 2022, 3, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koluman, N.; Paksoy, Y. Sustainability of Sheep Farming in Eastern Mediterranean Region; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyazoglu, J. Livestock farming as a factor of environmental, social and economic stability with special reference to research. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1998, 57, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, S.R.; Almeida, M.; Ribeiro, D.M.; Guedes, C.; González Montaña, J.R.; Pereira, A.F.; Zaralis, K.; Geraldo, A.; Tzamaloukas, O.; Cabrera, M.G.; et al. Extensive Sheep and Goat Production: The Role of Novel Technologies towards Sustainability and Animal Welfare. Animals 2021, 12, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caroprese, M.; Albenzio, M.; Sevi, A. Sustainability of Sheep and Goat Production Systems. In The Sustainability of Agro-Food and Natural Resource Systems in the Mediterranean Basin; Vastola, A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Abubakar, A.A.; Verma, A.K.; Umaraw, P.; Adewale Ahmed, M.; Mehta, N.; Hayat, M.N.; Kaka, U.; Sazili, A.Q. New insights in improving sustainability in meat production: Opportunities and challenges. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 11830–11858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, L.C.; Austrheim, G.; Asheim, L.J.; Bjarnason, G.; Feilberg, J.; Fosaa, A.M.; Hester, A.J.; Holand, Ø.; Jónsdóttir, I.S.; Mortensen, L.E.; et al. Sheep grazing in the North Atlantic region: A long-term perspective on environmental sustainability. Ambio 2016, 45, 551–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Díez-Unquera, B.; Ruiz, R.; Villalba, D.; Molina, E.; Joy, M.; Olaizola, A.; Bernués, A. An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agric. Syst. 2011, 105, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molotsi, A.; Dube, B.; Oosting, S.; Marandure, T.; Mapiye, C.; Cloete, S.; Dzama, K. Genetic Traits of Relevance to Sustainability of Smallholder Sheep Farming Systems in South Africa. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awad, R.; Titi, H.; Mohamed-Brahmi, A.; Jaouad, M.; Gasmi-Boubaker, A. Small ruminant value chain in Al-Ruwaished District, Jordan. Reg. Sustain. 2023, 4, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peacock, C.; Sherman, D. Sustainable goat production—Some global perspectives. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 89, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assan, N. Goat—A Sustainable and Holistic Approach in Addressing Triple Challenges of Gender Inequality, Climate Change Effects, Food and Nutrition Insecurity in Rural Communities of Sub-Saharan Africa; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koşum, N.; Taşkin, T.; Engindeniz, S.; Kandemir, Ç. Goat Meat Production and Evaluation of Its Sustainability in Turkey. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 2019, 56, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
The Indicators | Level of Education | Land Ownership | Land Cultivation | Fodder Cultivation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Experience of breeder/years | 0.89 ** | 0.80 ** | 0.82 ** | 0.86 ** |
Level of education | 0.79 ** | 0.83 ** | 0.84 ** | |
Land ownership | 0.96 ** | 0.73 ** | ||
Land cultivation | 0.76 ** |
Sheep | Rams % | NLE % | EL % | AL % | YLS % | LM % |
Awassi sheep % | −0.08 | −0.18 | 0.21 | −0.06 | 0.42 ** | −0.50 ** |
Rams % | −0.06 | −0.42 ** | −0.44 ** | 0.18 | 0.26 | |
NLE % | −0.88 ** | −0.15 | −0.01 | −0.03 | ||
EL % | 0.33 * | −0.06 | −0.11 | |||
AL % | −0.75 ** | −0.21 | ||||
YLS % | −0.47 ** | |||||
Goats | Bucks % | NKD % | KD % | AK % | YKS % | KM % |
Baladi goats % | −0.38 ** | −0.03 | 0.17 | −0.33 * | 0.35 ** | 0.07 |
Bucks % | 0.15 | −0.56 ** | 0.035 | −0.29 * | 0.043 | |
NKD % | −0.90 ** | 0.10 | −0.13 | −0.19 | ||
KD % | −0.07 | 0.24 | 0.12 | |||
AK % | −0.06 | −0.77 ** | ||||
YKS % | −0.55 ** |
Agricultural Indicators | Frequency | Percent (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Land ownership | Land owner | 36 | 67.92 |
Land tenant | 17 | 32.08 | |
Land cultivation | Farmer | 35 | 66.04 |
Non-farmer | 18 | 33.96 | |
Fodder cultivation | grow fodder | 28 | 52.83 |
Non-grow fodder | 25 | 47.17 | |
Metrics and Livestock Indicators | Averages | Std Error | |
Fixed costs/USD | 9372.83 | 268.31 | |
Variable costs/USD | 791.10 | 52.16 | |
Activity assets/USD | 9108.35 | 282.41 | |
year Activity debts/last year/USD | 265.36 | 56.03 | |
(Activity assets/year Activity debts) × 100 | 3.33 | 0.78 | |
Annual return/USD | 2284.37 | 93.99 | |
Revenue/animal/USD | 60.91 | 1.51 | |
Awassi sheep% | 56.48 | 1.17 | |
Male sheep% | 2.53 | 0.05 | |
Non-lambing% | 4.59 | 0.10 | |
Ewe birth% | 95.41 | 0.10 | |
Sheep female% | 46.44 | 0.06 | |
Lambs% | 25.34 | 0.29 | |
Lamb sales% | 18.01 | 0.31 | |
Lamb mortality% | 3.08 | 0.20 | |
Lamb survival% | 96.92 | 0.20 | |
Baladi goats% | 43.52 | 1.17 | |
Male goats% | 2.76 | 0.06 | |
Non-kidding% | 4.58 | 0.12 | |
Doe birth% | 95.42 | 0.12 | |
Goats female% | 46.33 | 0.07 | |
Kids% | 23.35 | 0.25 | |
Kids sales% | 17.91 | 0.21 | |
Kids mortality% | 5.08 | 0.32 | |
Kids survival% | 94.93 | 0.32 | |
Weaning age/day | 70.32 | 1.42 | |
Mortality age/month | 8.92 | 0.61 |
Indicators | Averages | Above Average | Below Average | Sustainability Assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Awassi sheep% | 56.5 | 47.2 | 52.8 | − |
Ewes birth% | 95.4 | 60.4 | 39.6 | + |
Lambs% | 25.3 | 37.7 | 62.3 | − |
Lamb survival% | 96.9 | 75.5 | 24.5 | + |
Yearling lamb sales% | 18 | 56.6 | 43.4 | + |
Indicators | Averages | Above Average | Below Average | Sustainability Assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Baladi goats% | 43.5 | 45.3 | 54.7 | − |
Doe birth% | 95.4 | 54.7 | 45.3 | + |
Kids% | 23.4 | 52.8 | 47.2 | + |
Kid survival% | 94.9 | 47.2 | 52.8 | − |
Yearling kid sales% | 17.9 | 69.8 | 30.2 | + |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al-Barakeh, F.; Khashroum, A.O.; Tarawneh, R.A.; Al-Lataifeh, F.A.; Al-Yacoub, A.N.; Dayoub, M.; Al-Najjar, K. Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming in Arid Regions of Jordan. Ruminants 2024, 4, 241-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4020017
Al-Barakeh F, Khashroum AO, Tarawneh RA, Al-Lataifeh FA, Al-Yacoub AN, Dayoub M, Al-Najjar K. Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming in Arid Regions of Jordan. Ruminants. 2024; 4(2):241-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4020017
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl-Barakeh, Faisal, Ashraf Omar Khashroum, Radi A. Tarawneh, Fatima A. Al-Lataifeh, Azzam N. Al-Yacoub, Moammar Dayoub, and Khaled Al-Najjar. 2024. "Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming in Arid Regions of Jordan" Ruminants 4, no. 2: 241-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4020017
APA StyleAl-Barakeh, F., Khashroum, A. O., Tarawneh, R. A., Al-Lataifeh, F. A., Al-Yacoub, A. N., Dayoub, M., & Al-Najjar, K. (2024). Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming in Arid Regions of Jordan. Ruminants, 4(2), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4020017