Next Article in Journal
On the Modeling of Isolation and Vibration Control Using Laminated Composite Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Field Caprock Shale Exposure to CO2 on Its Mechanical Properties—A Comparison of Experimental Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Review of Recent Achievements in Stress State Evaluation in Technical Element with Barkhausen Effect †

by
Bolesław Augustyniak
1,*,
Marek Chmielewski
1,2 and
Leszek Piotrowski
2
1
NNT Ltd., 80-125 Gdansk, Poland
2
Department of Magnetic Properties of Materials, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 19th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Kraków, Poland, 17–21 July 2022.
Phys. Sci. Forum 2022, 4(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2022004032
Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 19th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics)

Abstract

:
Relevant examples of the application of innovative measuring devices of NNT Company in the area of non-destructive assessment of the stress state of steel components using the Barkhausen effect are presented here. We have developed two innovative devices in which the Barkhausen effect signal detected at a given point is converted into real-time information about the stress level at that point. The research was focused on the objects and technological processes where the high stress state causes specific problems both at the stage of construction and later exploitation. Such processes include steel section manufacturing process, welding, rolling or tensile loading.

1. Introduction

The non-destructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E) of the stress state in steel construction components exploited in industry is still a very important technical issue of great practical significance due to the obvious need to reduce the risk of failure of such elements. Our scientific experience with evaluation of magneto-mechanical properties, with the Barkhausen effect (BE), in various steels [1,2] allows us to state that this phenomenon enables quick and low cost detection of stress states in an industrial environment. We present here the relevant examples of the application of such a technique, where two innovative devices elaborated by our spin-off company NNT Ltd. are used. These devices analyze the BE voltage signal and provide within a few second’s time information about the stress level directly in absolute values (MPa units). This particular property seems to be very desirable and useful when it is necessary to perform a non-destructive and quick stress state testing in the industrial environment.

2. Stress Evaluation Methodology with Novel BE Meters

The first meter MagStress5C is shown in Figure 1a. It locally magnetizes the tested material with a standard unidirectional sensor and analyzes the electromagnetic signals of BE, which exist due to the dynamic magnetization of the material. The intensity of the BE voltage signal induced in the sensor is quantified by the Int parameter. The relationship between the Int value and the strain level is stored in the memory of the meter in the form of a calibration function. Calibration functions are determined experimentally for reference samples for elastic deformation range. The stress level sigma (displayed by this meter) is calculated directly from the strain value eps deduced from this calibration function. This methodology provides quick estimator of stress level in a given direction of magnetization for isotropic steels. When searching for the principal components, S1 and S2, of stress, the directions and extreme values of EB intensity are determined by rotating the sensor. The two principal components S1 and S2 of stress can also be determined with MagStress5C taking EB intensity measurements in three directions differing by 45 degrees and using the relationship known from theoretical mechanics between these three strains and those two components of stress.
The second meter MagStress5D (shown in Figure 1b) enables finding the principal components of stress S1 and S2 automatically within a few seconds. The BE sensor contains two crossed electromagnets and magnetizes the material in a stepwise fashion. In this way, the angular distribution of the BE intensity Int(alpha) is determined. This angular distribution of BE intensity is converted using a calibration function to the angular distribution of strain eps(alpha). The calibration function used in the MagStress5D meter is two-dimensional and describes the dependence of the EB intensity on the strains eps given in the orthogonal X and Y directions, respectively. From eps(alpha) distribution, the strain principal components eps1 and eps2 and the corresponding values of the stress principal components S1 and S2 are finally determined and displayed on the meter screen. Stress components in the X and Y directions as well as the angle fi between S1 and sensor axis X direction are also displayed.
The calibration functions are determined for a given steel grade.

3. Examples of Stress State Evaluation

The results of a stress state evaluation where the distribution of stress over the tested element is determined by performing a set of BE measurements on this element are presented. We propose to provide the 2D map of a given stress component distribution because this way of stress state presentation allows one to perform quick and deep quantitative analysis of the stress state. These examples deal with the typical technologies of component production.

3.1. Residual Stress Due to Welding

Figure 2a depicts a section of the power plant boiler curtain wall with two tubes welded in parallel and with a third tube welded in perpendicular direction to this section (seen as a black hole). The intensity of the BE (Int) and corresponding strain eps was recorded with a MagStress5c meter at selected points on the pipe surface in three main directions (circumferential direction (H), axial direction (A) and intermediate (T)). Those Int values were transformed into three corresponding strain levels using the appropriate calibration function, and from them the stress components in any direction can be calculated. The 2D map of stress in the axial direction shown in Figure 2b reveals the complex nature of stress distribution of such a section—mainly compressive stress at the central part and tensile near the weld seam of the L1 tube.
An exemplary result of bi-axial stress state determination in a welded ship section (shown in Figure 3a) performed with the Magstress5D device is presented in Figure 3b. Angular distributions of BE intensity recorded at the points M7, M8, M4 and M6 with resulting values in MPa of components S1 and S2 and angle fi between S1 and the axis of the sensor are shown. Axis X is chosen as parallel to the horizontal axis of the section. One can find very complex states of residual stress distribution mainly close to the additionally welded plate (labeled with O) in the central part of this section.

3.2. Residual Stress Due to Mechanical Manufacturing Procedures

First, some relevant results of residual stress state investigation performed on the surface of the series of constructional components, which had undergone various manufacturing procedures in the foundry, are presented. The BE intensity was measured with a MagStress5C meter on the surface in three directions, and stress component sigma along axis X of the component is shown. Two samples that are here reported (labelled as St1 and St2) had undergone the following foundry procedures—St1: hot rolling, cooling, bending, straightening and sand blasting; and St2: St1 + cold drawing and straightening. The straightening is performed by means of a rolling leveling procedure, while cold drawing was made by tensile leveling. The 2D map of residual stress state distributions for state St1 shown in Figure 4a reveals a highly compressive stress state of the order of −120 MPa with local extrema and with an amplitude of about 40 MPa. Figure 4b presents the 2D map of residual stress for state St2. One can see that the compressive state is now changed to nearly zero stress state (mean value of sigma 5 ± 10 MPa) when final cold drawing and straightening are applied.
The next example deals with rolling leveling procedure of steel sheets applied commonly in various industry sectors in order to prevent bending of the parts which are cut out from the initial sheet. We report here some results of stress state evaluation performed on steel sheets used in a shipyard to make ship hulls. The tested sheet had dimensions L = 12 m in length (X direction) and W = 2.5 m in width (Y direction). The BE measurements were performed with the multi-directional sensor, and 2D maps of stress component in X direction are here presented. Figure 5a reveals the stress distribution on the upper side of the sheet in an as delivered state. One can find, that the stress component in X direction is not uniform with the length and is mostly tensile (from 20 MPa up to 60 MPa). The result of multi-pass rolling straightening of this sheet is shown in Figure 5b. Modification of stress state is evident, but not as good as could be expected. The main part of the sheet reveals nearly zero state, while at the border area of the sheet, “new” tensile stress appears. This non-uniform stress distribution results from the poor mechanical condition of the rolling machine. The machine was later repaired, and its further operation was correct.
The last example of stress state evaluation deals with non-typical mechanical treatment of a metal component. This is a saw blade used for woodcutting. Part of this saw S2 is shown in Figure 6a. Numerous circular indentations are visible in this photo. These have been introduced to improve the performance of the disc by reducing the risk of cracking. The BE measurements were performed with MagStress5c meter along line L1 in hoop (1) and radial (2) directions, respectively. The resulting distributions along line L1 of both components of stress in those directions are shown in Figure 6b.
The stress component in the hoop direction varies in a specific way: it is mostly tensile and increases (up to 80 MPa) along the disk radius and drops down at indentation areas to a compressive state of the order of −20 MPa. The stress component in a radial direction is nearly constant and close to zero level along the disk radius.

4. Conclusions

Our research on stress state determination included ferromagnetic steel components from the various industry sectors. The research was focused on the objects and technological processes where the high stress levels cause problems both at the construction and exploitation stages.
The reported results prove that the demonstrated innovative concept of BE device application for stress state evaluation enables an effective and fast control of the many technological processes (e.g., welding, shot peening, as well as rolling or tensile leveling) as well as monitoring of safe operation of industrial components.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.A. and M.C.; methodology, B.A., M.C. and L.P.; formal analysis, B.A.; investigation, B.A., M.C. and L.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A.; writing—review and editing, B.A., M.C. and L.P.; supervision, B.A., M.C. and L.P.; funding acquisition, B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Centre for Research and Development grant number POIR.01.01-00-1094/18-00 and the APC was funded by B.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Augustyniak, B. Magnetomechanical Phenomena and Its Application in Nondestructive Testing of Materials; Monography no 38; Gdansk University of Technology: Gdansk, Poland, 2003. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  2. Augustyniak, B.; Piotrowski, L.; Chmielewski, M.; Kielczynski, W.; Prokop, K. Progress in the Post Weld Residual Stress Evaluation Using Barkhausen Effect Meter with a Novel Rotating Magnetic Field Sensor. Available online: http://www.ndt.net/search/link.php?id=16857&file=events/ECNDT2014/app/content/Paper/647_Augustyniak.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
Figure 1. (a) MagStress5C with standard sensor; and (b)MagStress5D with multi-directional sensor.
Figure 1. (a) MagStress5C with standard sensor; and (b)MagStress5D with multi-directional sensor.
Psf 04 00032 g001
Figure 2. The power plant boiler screen section with welded tubes L1 and L2 (a); and distribution of residual stress over the L1 tube (axial direction) (b).
Figure 2. The power plant boiler screen section with welded tubes L1 and L2 (a); and distribution of residual stress over the L1 tube (axial direction) (b).
Psf 04 00032 g002
Figure 3. (a) Ship section with welded components; and (b) MagStress5D readings for given points in Figure 3 (a).
Figure 3. (a) Ship section with welded components; and (b) MagStress5D readings for given points in Figure 3 (a).
Psf 04 00032 g003
Figure 4. (a) Stress distribution for the St1 sample. (b) Stress distribution for the St2 sample.
Figure 4. (a) Stress distribution for the St1 sample. (b) Stress distribution for the St2 sample.
Psf 04 00032 g004
Figure 5. (a) Stress distribution for as delivered state. (b) Stress distribution after straightening.
Figure 5. (a) Stress distribution for as delivered state. (b) Stress distribution after straightening.
Psf 04 00032 g005
Figure 6. (a) Tested saw blade and line L1. (b) Stress distribution: 1—hoop direction, 2—radial direction along line L1.
Figure 6. (a) Tested saw blade and line L1. (b) Stress distribution: 1—hoop direction, 2—radial direction along line L1.
Psf 04 00032 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Augustyniak, B.; Chmielewski, M.; Piotrowski, L. Review of Recent Achievements in Stress State Evaluation in Technical Element with Barkhausen Effect. Phys. Sci. Forum 2022, 4, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2022004032

AMA Style

Augustyniak B, Chmielewski M, Piotrowski L. Review of Recent Achievements in Stress State Evaluation in Technical Element with Barkhausen Effect. Physical Sciences Forum. 2022; 4(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2022004032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Augustyniak, Bolesław, Marek Chmielewski, and Leszek Piotrowski. 2022. "Review of Recent Achievements in Stress State Evaluation in Technical Element with Barkhausen Effect" Physical Sciences Forum 4, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/psf2022004032

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop