Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Skyscraper Wind around High-Rise Buildings in Coastal Region, South Korea, during Typhoon ‘Hinnamnor’
Next Article in Special Issue
Aerodynamic Characterization of the 516 Arouca Pedestrian Suspension Bridge over the Paiva River
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Ice Formation on Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Performance and Aerodynamics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wind Loading of Photovoltaic Panels Installed on Hip Roofs of Rectangular and L-Shaped Low-Rise Buildings
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study on Phase Characteristics of Wind Pressure Fields around a Prism Using Complex Proper Orthogonal Decomposition

Wind 2023, 3(1), 35-63; https://doi.org/10.3390/wind3010004
by Tomoyuki Murakami 1,2,*, Yuichiro Nishida 2 and Tetsuro Taniguchi 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Wind 2023, 3(1), 35-63; https://doi.org/10.3390/wind3010004
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wind Loads on Buildings and Structures)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very good paper. It discussed the phase characteristics of the surface pressure of rigid/elastic prism models in uniform and boundary layer flows. The results are very important for wind-resistant design of high-rise buildings.

A small question: in section 2.2 for rigid model, the reduced velocity is defined as Vr=UH/f0B and f0 is the natural frequency f0=8.34Hz. What is the natural frequency of a rigid model? the natural frequency of the elastic model?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper is believed to provide valuable knowledge for the wind-resistant design of tall buildings.

But the authors are advised to add more information on the evaluation of damping ratio. Based on the previous study, the damping ratios become very large and show clear amplitude dependency when there are pressure tubes on vibrating model. The authors need to show more clearly 1) how to evaluate damping ratios, 2) characteristics of amplitude dependency of damping ratios, 3) effect of damping ratios on the CPOD results, and 4) compare the current results with the ones in the previous study, i.e. Kim et al., 2018, JWEIA.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attachment. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript was revised and improved properly.

Back to TopTop