Next Article in Journal
Factors Affecting Water Deprivation Resistance in Bactrocera oleae (Olive Fruit Fly)
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems on Soil Properties and Microbial Diversity in Soybean Production
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering the Role of the Nucleus Accumbens Shell Area on Spatial Memory Deficits Induced by Neuropathic Pain in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Pulse Proteins: Physical, Chemical and Fermentative Modifications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Short Review of Second-Generation Isobutanol Production by SHF and SSF

by
Hironaga Akita
1,* and
Akinori Matsushika
2
1
Department of Liberal Arts and Basic Science, College of Industrial Technology, Nihon University, 1-2-1 Izumi-cho, Narashino 275-8575, Japan
2
Department of Biotechnology and Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-2116, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Biosci. 2024, 3(3), 296-309; https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3030020
Submission received: 14 May 2024 / Revised: 30 June 2024 / Accepted: 2 July 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Applied Biosciences 2024)

Abstract

As isobutanol exhibits higher energy density and lower hygroscopicity than ethanol, it is considered a better candidate biofuel. The sustainable supply of inedible biomass and lack of competition with the food supply have stimulated significant worldwide interest in the production of isobutanol from this resource. Both separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) have been applied to isobutanol production to effectively utilize inedible biomass as a feedstock. However, both processes have various challenges, including low isobutanol yield and high production costs. This review summarizes the potential of isobutanol as a biofuel, methods for conferring isobutanol productivity, recent experimental studies, and developments in both SHF and SSF with the isobutanol-producing strains. Challenges to increasing the isobutanol yield and various suggestions for improvements to enable commercial production are also discussed.
Keywords: isobutanol; biomass utilization; separate hydrolysis and fermentation; simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; metabolic engineering isobutanol; biomass utilization; separate hydrolysis and fermentation; simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; metabolic engineering

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akita, H.; Matsushika, A. A Short Review of Second-Generation Isobutanol Production by SHF and SSF. Appl. Biosci. 2024, 3, 296-309. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3030020

AMA Style

Akita H, Matsushika A. A Short Review of Second-Generation Isobutanol Production by SHF and SSF. Applied Biosciences. 2024; 3(3):296-309. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3030020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akita, Hironaga, and Akinori Matsushika. 2024. "A Short Review of Second-Generation Isobutanol Production by SHF and SSF" Applied Biosciences 3, no. 3: 296-309. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3030020

APA Style

Akita, H., & Matsushika, A. (2024). A Short Review of Second-Generation Isobutanol Production by SHF and SSF. Applied Biosciences, 3(3), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci3030020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop