Review of Blockchain Applications in Food Supply Chains
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Challenges of the Food System
- Identifying the participants in each transaction;
- Understanding the laws governing privacy and secrecy;
- How transactions are endorsed;
- How the network is regulated;
- The assets that are tracked may not always have monetary value.
1.2. Blockchain Technology
1.2.1. Features of Blockchain Technology
1.2.2. General Data Structure of BCT
- Header—The structure of the smallest unit that makes up a “chain” is known as the header. It includes fundamental details such as the timestamp and the previous block’s hash. The Merkle root of transactions and states is also included. This is so that all of the data in the Merkle tree can be verified simply by checking the headers.
- Header + Transaction—The combination of all the headers and all the transactions is what we refer to as the “blockchain” itself. The other nodes validate the “blocks” published by the nodes that mine or propose a block. It is the smallest piece of data that can represent the entire network since it is feasible to determine the status of the entire blockchain from just a chain of headers and transactions, which is the fundamental unit utilized in actual chains.
- Header + Transaction + State—The maximum range that the header can verify is when the state is added to the prior data set. It is also the biggest collection where the protocol expressly guarantees that every node has the exact same value. The complete node maintains this data collection. Additionally, it is the bare minimum of data required to validate an entire block. Therefore, in order to verify and vote on the newly proposed block, we require the data set that has been described thus far.
- …+ Cache—From this point on, each node is free to have any value, irrespective of protocol. There is no need for and cannot be a verification of these data because it depends on the implementation.
2. Materials and Methodology
3. Discussions
3.1. Evolution of Blockchain Application in Food Supply Chains
3.2. Blockchains and Food Security
“when all people at all times have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life ”.
3.3. Social, Cultural, and Economic Aspects of Blockchain Adoption in Food System
3.4. Legal and Regulatory Compliance
- Food Safety Regulations: The food industry is heavily regulated to ensure consumer safety. Implementing blockchain should align with existing regulations such as the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) in the United States or the General Food Law in the European Union. Blockchain can aid in meeting compliance by providing an immutable record of food provenance and quality.
- Data Privacy and Protection: Blockchain records are immutable, but they can still contain personal or sensitive data. Compliance with data protection regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires careful handling of personal information stored on the blockchain. Ensuring that only necessary and compliant data are stored is crucial.
- Product Labeling and Claims: Blockchain can help verify product claims such as organic, non-GMO, or fair trade. However, misrepresentation can still occur, and blockchain implementation should not violate labeling regulations or mislead consumers.
- Customs and Trade Regulations: For international food supply chains, blockchain can streamline customs and trade processes. However, adherence to import/export regulations and tariffs remains essential.
3.5. Data Ownership and Security Concerns
- Ownership of Data: Blockchain’s decentralized nature raises questions about who owns the data stored on the chain. Participants might share ownership, but determining access rights and responsibilities should be defined through smart contracts and legal agreements.
- Liability for Data Accuracy: Blockchain’s immutability can be a double-edged sword. While it prevents tampering, erroneous data entry can become a permanent record. Establishing protocols for data verification and correction mechanisms is crucial to preventing legal disputes.
- Smart Contract Ambiguity: Smart contracts on the blockchain automatically execute actions when predefined conditions are met. Ambiguities or unforeseen situations could lead to contract disputes. Legal experts should review and ensure smart contract language is precise and comprehensive.
- Cross-Jurisdictional Legal Challenges: The food supply chain often crosses international borders, introducing diverse legal frameworks. Blockchain implementation should consider how it complies with varying laws related to contracts, data protection, and more.
- Product Recalls and Liability: Blockchain’s traceability capabilities can expedite recalls, but they also raise questions about shared liability in case of a recall. Clear agreements regarding responsibility and processes are crucial to managing such scenarios.
- Smart Contract Failures: If a smart contract malfunctions, resulting in financial loss or other damages, liability becomes a concern. The legal status of smart contracts and their enforceability vary by jurisdiction and should be addressed in contracts.
4. Future Work
4.1. Supply Chain Identity Management
4.2. Utility Tokens
4.2.1. Ownership Tokens—Traceability without Compromising Security or Privacy
4.2.2. Asset Backed Tokens—Recognition and Royalties
4.2.3. Green Tokens—Carbon-Credit-Based Life Cycle Assessment
4.3. Payment Tokens
4.4. Automation
4.4.1. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO)
4.4.2. Integration with Digital Twin Technology
5. Conclusions
- Lack of standardization: There is a lack of standardization in the development of blockchain-based solutions for maritime trade document processing, which can lead to interoperability issues between different systems.
- Legal and regulatory issues: There is a need for a clear legal and regulatory framework for the use of blockchain technology in maritime trade document processing. This includes issues related to data privacy, liability, and dispute resolution.
- Scalability: Blockchain technology is still facing challenges with scalability, which is a critical issue for large-scale systems such as international maritime trade.
- Adoption and integration: The adoption and integration of blockchain technology in the maritime trade industry is still in its early stages, and there is a need for further research on the practical challenges of implementing blockchain-based solutions.
- Cost-effectiveness: There is a need for research on the cost-effectiveness of blockchain-based solutions for maritime trade document processing compared to traditional paper-based processes.
- Interoperability with existing systems: There is a need for further research on how blockchain-based solutions can be integrated with existing legacy systems in the maritime trade industry.
- User acceptance: There is a need for research on user acceptance of blockchain-based solutions for maritime trade document processing, as well as the training and education required for users to effectively use these systems.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AFN | Alternate Food Network |
AFSC | Agri-Food Supply Chain |
BCT | Blockchain Technology |
CPI | Consumer-Producer Interaction |
DAO | Decentralized Autonomous Organization |
DApps | Decentralized Application |
DLT | Distributed Ledger Technology |
FLW | Food Loss and Wastes |
FS | Food Security |
FSC | Food Supply Chain |
IAM | Identity and Access Management |
ICO | Initial Coin Offering |
IPFS | Interplanetary File System |
LAFS | Localized Agri-Food System |
LCA | Life Cycle Assessment |
MRL | Maximum Residue Level |
P2P | Peer to Peer |
UA | Urban Agriculture |
References
- World Trade Organization. World Trade Report 2021 Economic Resilience and Trade. 2021. Available online: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/sps10key2020_e.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2022).
- Göbel, C.; Langen, N.; Blumenthal, A.; Teitscheid, P.; Ritter, G. Cutting food waste through cooperation along the food supply chain. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1429–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hubeau, M.; Marchand, F.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. Sustainability experiments in the agri-food system: Uncovering the factors of new governance and collaboration success. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niebylski, M.L.; Lu, T.; Campbell, N.R.; Arcand, J.; Schermel, A.; Hua, D.; Yeates, K.E.; Tobe, S.W.; Twohig, P.A.; L’Abbé, M.R.; et al. Healthy food procurement policies and their impact. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 2608–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottani, E.; Ferretti, G.; Montanari, R.; Rinaldi, M. Analysis and optimisation of inventory management policies for perishable food products: A simulation study. Int. J. Simul. Process. Model. 2014, 9, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyd, S.L.; Hobbs, J.E.; Kerr, W.A. The impact of customs procedures on business to consumer e-commerce in food products. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2003, 8, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayett-Moreno, Y.; López Oglesby, J.M. Beyond food security: Challenges in food safety policies and governance along a heterogeneous agri-food chain and its effects on health measures and sustainable development in Mexico. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasaklis, T.K.; Casino, F.; Patsakis, C. Defining granularity levels for supply chain traceability based on IoT and blockchain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Omni-Layer Intelligent Systems, Crete, Greece, 5–7 May 2019; pp. 184–190. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Wen, J. The IoT electric business model: Using blockchain technology for the internet of things. Peer Peer Netw. Appl. 2017, 10, 983–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casino, F.; Kanakaris, V.; Dasaklis, T.K.; Moschuris, S.; Rachaniotis, N.P. Modeling food supply chain traceability based on blockchain technology. Ifac-Papersonline 2019, 52, 2728–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reiff, N. How Much of All Money Is in Bitcoin? 2021. Available online: https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-much-worlds-money-bitcoin/ (accessed on 5 July 2022).
- Kumar, K.D.; Kumar, M.; Anandh, R. Blockchain technology in food supply chain security. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9, 3446–3450. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, L.; Brewster, C.; Spek, J.; Smeenk, A.; Top, J.; Van Diepen, F.; Klaase, B.; Graumans, C.; de Wildt, M.d.R. Blockchain for Agriculture and Food: Findings from the Pilot Study; Number 2017-112; Wageningen Economic Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, B.; Zhan, P.; Lei, M.; Zhou, F.; Wang, P. Food quality monitoring system based on smart contracts and evaluation models. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 12479–12490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jauch, L.R.; Osborn, R.N.; Martin, T.N. Structured content analysis of cases: A complementary method for organizational research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1980, 5, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayring, P. Qualitative content analysis. Companion Qual. Res. 2004, 1, 159–176. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.N.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 2018, 14, 352–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Wang, K.; Cai, X.; Guo, S.; Guo, M.; Rong, C. A comprehensive survey of blockchain: From theory to IoT applications and beyond. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 8114–8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casino, F.; Dasaklis, T.K.; Patsakis, C. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 36, 55–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torky, M.; Hassanein, A.E. Integrating blockchain and the internet of things in precision agriculture: Analysis, opportunities, and challenges. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 178, 105476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbosa, M.W. Uncovering research streams on agri-food supply chain management: A bibliometric study. Glob. Food Secur. 2021, 28, 100517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, S. Livestock mobility through integrated beef production-scapes supports rangeland livestock production and conservation. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 4, 549359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.H.; Chung, L.; Kumar, A.; Zailani, S.; Tan, K.H. A sustainable Blockchain framework for the halal food supply chain: Lessons from Malaysia. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 170, 120870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, T.; Mondal, S.; Islam, N.; Rakshit, S. The impact of blockchain technology on the tea supply chain and its sustainable performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 173, 121163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Wang, W.; Chen, B.; Zhang, X. Evaluation on frozen shellfish quality by blockchain based multi-sensors monitoring and SVM algorithm during cold storage. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 54361–54370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti, M. EVO-NFC: Extra virgin olive oil traceability using NFC suitable for small-medium farms. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 20345–20356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Q.; Cui, X.; Zhao, S.; Yang, W.; Yu, R. The food quality safety management system based on block chain technology and application in rice traceability. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2018, 33, 102–110. [Google Scholar]
- Shahid, A.; Almogren, A.; Javaid, N.; Al-Zahrani, F.A.; Zuair, M.; Alam, M. Blockchain-based agri-food supply chain: A complete solution. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 69230–69243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, A.; Ngan, P.T. A proposed framework model for dairy supply chain traceability. Sustain. Futures 2020, 2, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salah, K.; Nizamuddin, N.; Jayaraman, R.; Omar, M. Blockchain-based soybean traceability in agricultural supply chain. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 73295–73305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekawati, R.; Arkeman, Y.; Suprihatin, S.; Sunarti, T.C. Similaritas Proposed Design of White Sugar Industrial Supply Chain System based on Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 459–465. [Google Scholar]
- Bumblauskas, D.; Mann, A.; Dugan, B.; Rittmer, J. A blockchain use case in food distribution: Do you know where your food has been? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 102008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, F.; Xiao, X.; Hecker, A.; Dustdar, S. A Theoretical Model Characterizing Tangle Evolution in IOTA Blockchain Network. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 10, 1259–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kshetri, N. Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 60, 102376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motta, G.A.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Athanasiadis, I.N. Blockchain applications in the agri-food domain: The first wave. Front. Blockchain 2020, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasaklis, T.K.; Malamas, V. A Review of the Lightning Network’s Evolution: Unraveling Its Present State and the Emergence of Disruptive Digital Business Models. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 1338–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food Summit, F. Declaration of the world summit on food security. In Proceedings of the World Food Summit, Rome, Italy, 16–18 November 2009; pp. 16–18. [Google Scholar]
- Galanakis, C.M. Food Security and Nutrition; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kannan, K.; Dev, S.M.; Sharma, A.N. Concerns on food security. Econ. Political Wkly. 2000, 3919–3922. [Google Scholar]
- Barrett, C.B. Measuring food insecurity. Science 2010, 327, 825–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coates, J. Build it back better: Deconstructing food security for improved measurement and action. Glob. Food Secur. 2013, 2, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutz, W.; Scherbov, S.; Prskawetz, A.; Dworak, M.; Feichtinger, G. Population, natural resources, and food security: Lessons from comparing full and reduced-form models. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2002, 28, 199–224. [Google Scholar]
- Kurtsal, Y.; Viaggi, D. Exploring Collaboration and Consumer Behavior in Food Community Networks and Constraints Preventing Active Participation: The Case of Turkey. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, B.; Foley, C.; Edwards, D.; Donaghy, G. Outcomes and challenges of an international convention centre’s local procurement strategy. Tour. Manag. 2019, 75, 328–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Accorsi, R.; Baruffaldi, G.; Manzini, R.; Tufano, A. On the design of cooperative vendors’ networks in retail food supply chains: A logistics-driven approach. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018, 21, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, R.S.; dos Santos Pinto, R.M.; Melo, F.F.S.; Campos, S.S.; Cordovil, C.M.d.S. A simple awareness campaign to promote food waste reduction in a University canteen. Waste Manag. 2018, 76, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iftekhar, A.; Cui, X.; Hassan, M.; Afzal, W. Application of blockchain and Internet of Things to ensure tamper-proof data availability for food safety. J. Food Qual. 2020, 2020, 5385207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khateeb, S.A.; Hussain, A.; Lange, S.; Almutari, M.M.; Schneider, F. Battling Food Losses and Waste in Saudi Arabia: Mobilizing Regional Efforts and Blending Indigenous Knowledge to Address Global Food Security Challenges. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stearns, S. Developing internal partnerships to enhance a local foods campaign. J. Ext. 2018, 56, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A.; Mhurchu, C.N.; Sacks, G.; Swinburn, B.; Snowdon, W.; Vandevijvere, S.; Hawkes, C.; L’Abbé, M.; Rayner, M.; Sanders, D.; et al. Monitoring the price and affordability of foods and diets globally. Obes. Rev. 2013, 14, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pinstrup-Andersen, P. Food security: Definition and measurement. Food Secur. 2009, 1, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureati, M.; Pagliarini, E.; Toschi, T.G.; Monteleone, E. Research challenges and methods to study food preferences in school-aged children: A review of the last 15 years. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 46, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, J.; Lang, T.; Vorley, B.; Barling, D. Addressing policy challenges for more sustainable local–global food chains: Policy frameworks and possible food “futures”. Sustainability 2016, 8, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moragues-Faus, A.; Sonnino, R.; Marsden, T. Exploring European food system vulnerabilities: Towards integrated food security governance. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 75, 184–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opitz, I.; Zoll, F.; Zasada, I.; Doernberg, A.; Siebert, R.; Piorr, A. Consumer-producer interactions in community-supported agriculture and their relevance for economic stability of the farm–An empirical study using an Analytic Hierarchy Process. J. Rural. Stud. 2019, 68, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, K.; Lawrence, G. From disaster management to adaptive governance? Governance challenges to achieving resilient food systems in Australia. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2018, 20, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maggio, A.; Van Criekinge, T.; Malingreau, J.P. Global food security: Assessing trends in view of guiding future EU policies. Foresight 2016, 18, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ocampo, L.A.; Villegas, Z.V.A.; Carvajal, J.a.T.; Apas, C.A.A. Identifying significant drivers for sustainable practices in achieving sustainable food supply chain using modified fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory approach. Int. J. Adv. Oper. Manag. 2018, 10, 51–89. [Google Scholar]
- Paloviita, A.; Kortetmäki, T.; Puupponen, A.; Silvasti, T. Vulnerability matrix of the food system: Operationalizing vulnerability and addressing food security. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 1242–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunting, S.W.; Little, D.C. Urban aquaculture for resilient food systems. In Cities and Agriculture Developing Resilient Urban Food Systems.Earthscan Food and Agriculture; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 312–335. [Google Scholar]
- Allan, T.; Keulertz, M.; Woertz, E. The water–food–energy nexus: An introduction to nexus concepts and some conceptual and operational problems. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2015, 31, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haysom, G.; Tawodzera, G. “Measurement drives diagnosis and response”: Gaps in transferring food security assessment to the urban scale. Food Policy 2018, 74, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozor, N.; Enete, A.; Amaechina, E. Drivers of rural–urban interdependence and their contributions to vulnerability in food systems in Nigeria—A framework. Clim. Dev. 2016, 8, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mantino, F.; Forcina, B. Market, policies and local governance as drivers of environmental public benefits: The case of the localised processed tomato in northern Italy. Agriculture 2018, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forssell, S.; Lankoski, L. Shaping norms. A convention theoretical examination of alternative food retailers as food sustainability transition actors. J. Rural. Stud. 2018, 63, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerrada-Serra, P.; Moragues-Faus, A.; Zwart, T.A.; Adlerova, B.; Ortiz-Miranda, D.; Avermaete, T. Exploring the contribution of alternative food networks to food security. A comparative analysis. Food Secur. 2018, 10, 1371–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Drescher, M. Urban crops and livestock: The experiences, challenges, and opportunities of planning for urban agriculture in two Canadian provinces. Land Use Policy 2015, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulyas, B.Z.; Edmondson, J.L. Increasing city resilience through urban agriculture: Challenges and solutions in the Global North. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Fiore, G.; Specht, K.; Zanasi, C. Assessing motivations and perceptions of stakeholders in urban agriculture: A review and analytical framework. Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev. 2021, 13, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Formentini, M.; Secondi, L.; Ruini, L.; Guidi, M.; Principato, L. Enablers and barriers to circular supply chain management: A decision-support tool in soft wheat bread production. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2022, 35, 796–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.; Daultani, Y.; Sahu, R. Investigating the barriers to growth in the Indian food processing sector. OPSEARCH 2022, 59, 441–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turan, C.; Ozturkoglu, Y. A conceptual framework model for an effective cold food chain management in sustainability environment. J. Model. Manag. 2022, 17, 1262–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gokarn, S.; Kuthambalayan, T.S. Analysis of challenges inhibiting the reduction of waste in food supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, K.Y.; Abdullah, J.; Khan, A.S. A framework for traceable and transparent supply chain management for agri-food sector in malaysia using blockchain technology. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Li, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J. Smart contract-based product traceability system in the supply chain scenario. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 115122–115133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, K.; Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Han, T. Design and implementation of food supply chain traceability system based on Hyperledger Fabric. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2020, 23, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Ma, D.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Z. Sales mode selection of fresh food supply chain based on blockchain technology under different channel competition. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 162, 107730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, H. A Conceptual Model of a B2B Food Distribution Platform Based on Blockchain Consensus Mechanism. Int. J. Contents 2021, 17. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, N.; Ormiston, J. Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 175, 121403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surasak, T.; Wattanavichean, N.; Preuksakarn, C.; Huang, S.C. Thai agriculture products traceability system using blockchain and internet of things. System 2019, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen Gupta, Y.; Mukherjee, S.; Dutta, R.; Bhattacharya, S. A blockchain-based approach using smart contracts to develop a smart waste management system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 19, 7833–7856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuit, A.; Brockington, D.; Corbera, E. Smart, commodified and encoded. Conserv. Soc. 2022, 20, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, P.; Steenmans, K.; Steenmans, I. Blockchain technology for sustainable waste management. Front. Political Sci. 2020, 2, 590923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juma, H.; Shaalan, K.; Kamel, I. A survey on using blockchain in trade supply chain solutions. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 184115–184132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.K.; Jenamani, M.; Dasgupta, D.; Das, S. A conceptual model for Indian public distribution system using consortium blockchain with on-chain and off-chain trusted data. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2021, 27, 499–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawar, R.S.; Sonje, S.A.; Shukla, S. Food subsidy distribution system through Blockchain technology: A value focused thinking approach for prototype development. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2021, 27, 470–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagtap, S.; Duong, L.; Trollman, H.; Bader, F.; Garcia-Garcia, G.; Skouteris, G.; Li, J.; Pathare, P.; Martindale, W.; Swainson, M.; et al. IoT technologies in the food supply chain. In Food Technology Disruptions; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 175–211. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Sun, P.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Dong, Y. Blockchain-based safety management system for the grain supply chain. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 36398–36410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, R.V.; Harsh, H.O.; Ray, P.; Babu, A.K. Food quality traceability prototype for restaurants using blockchain and food quality data index. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, W.; Im, J.; Choi, T.; Kim, D. Blockchain-based object name service with tokenized authority. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2019, 13, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, C. Electronic agriculture, blockchain and digital agricultural democratization: Origin, theory and application. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Long, Y.; Song, H.C.; He, Y.D. Investment decision and coordination of green agri-food supply chain considering information service based on blockchain and big data. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 277, 123646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balzarova, M.A. Blockchain technology—A new era of ecolabelling schemes? Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2021, 21, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, S.; Saha, S.; Singh, A.K.; McDonald-Maier, K. FoodSQRBlock: Digitizing food production and the supply chain with blockchain and QR code in the cloud. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Q.; Cui, X.; Huang, X.; Leigh, A.M.; Gu, H. Food safety supervision system based on hierarchical multi-domain blockchain network. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 51817–51826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Q.; Wang, H.; Pei, X.; Wang, J. Food safety traceability system based on blockchain and EPCIS. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 20698–20707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiscini, R.; Testarmata, S.; Ciaburri, M.; Ferrari, E. The blockchain as a sustainable business model innovation. Manag. Decis. 2020, 58, 1621–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, F.T.; Garrett, B. Technology for sustainable urban food ecosystems in the developing world: Strengthening the nexus of food–water–energy–nutrition. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saurabh, S.; Dey, K. Blockchain technology adoption, architecture, and sustainable agri-food supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouhizadeh, M.; Saberi, S.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 231, 107831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faisal, M.N.; Talib, F. Implementing traceability in Indian food-supply chains: An interpretive structural modeling approach. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2016, 19, 171–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, A.; Shrivastava, G.; Kumar, P. Architecting user-centric internet of things for smart agriculture. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2019, 23, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, H.; Maheshwari, P. Blockchain in Indian public distribution system: A conceptual framework to prevent leakage of the supplies and its enablers and disablers. J. Glob. Oper. Strateg. Sourc. 2021, 14, 312–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Liu, R.; Shan, Z. Is blockchain a silver bullet for supply chain management? Technical challenges and research opportunities. Decis. Sci. 2020, 51, 8–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakkhupan, W.; Arch-Int, S.; Li, Y. An RFID-based traceability system: A case study of rice supply chain. Telecommun. Syst. 2015, 58, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masudin, I.; Ramadhani, A.; Restuputri, D.P. Traceability system model of Indonesian food cold-chain industry: A Covid-19 pandemic perspective. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Shu, L.; Hancke, G.P.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. From Industry 4.0 to Agriculture 4.0: Current status, enabling technologies, and research challenges. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 4322–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, V.; Pant, M.; Snasel, V. Blockchain technology in food supply chains: Review and bibliometric analysis. Technol. Soc. 2022, 69, 101954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przytarski, D.; Stach, C.; Gritti, C.; Mitschang, B. Query processing in blockchain systems: Current state and future challenges. Future Internet 2021, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Powell, W.; Foth, M.; Natanelov, V.; Miller, T.; Dulleck, U. Strengthening consumer trust in beef supply chain traceability with a blockchain-based human-machine reconcile mechanism. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 180, 105886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oguntegbe, K.F.; Di Paola, N.; Vona, R. Behavioural antecedents to blockchain implementation in agrifood supply chain management: A thematic analysis. Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Wijewardena, K.P.; Karuppuswami, S.; Kriti, N.; Kumar, D.; Chahal, P. Blockchain inspired RFID-based information architecture for food supply chain. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 5803–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, J.; Wu, W.; Yu, Q.; Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Xiang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Shi, Y.; Duan, Y.; Yang, P. Filling the trust gap of food safety in food trade between the EU and China: An interconnected conceptual traceability framework based on blockchain. Food Energy Secur. 2020, 9, e249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A. Tracing the Story of Food Across Food Systems. Front. Commun. 2022, 7, 727647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, W.; Mao, J.; Wu, L.; Pu, X. Public cognition of the application of blockchain in food safety management—Data from China’s Zhihu platform. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 303, 127044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, Y.; Bremer, P.; Mather, D.; Mirosa, M. Factors affecting the diffusion of traceability practices in an imported fresh produce supply chain in China. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 1350–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hew, J.J.; Wong, L.W.; Tan, G.W.H.; Ooi, K.B.; Lin, B. The blockchain-based Halal traceability systems: A hype or reality? Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2020, 25, 863–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raskin, M. The law and legality of smart contracts. Geo. Law Technol. Rev. 2016, 1, 305. [Google Scholar]
- Mao, D.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Hao, Z. Visual and user-defined smart contract designing system based on automatic coding. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 73131–73143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razzaq, A.; Khan, M.M.; Talib, R.; Butt, A.D.; Hanif, N.; Afzal, S.; Raouf, M.R. Use of Blockchain in governance: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2019, 10, 111576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Yin-He, S.; Qian, Y.; Zhi-Yu, S.; Chun-Zi, W.; Zi-Yun, L. Method of reaching consensus on probability of food safety based on the integration of finite credible data on block chain. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 123764–123776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, D.; Xin, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, G. Optimized data storage method for sharding-based blockchain. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 67890–67900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erol, I.; Ar, I.; Ozdemir, A.; Peker, I.; Asgary, A.; Medeni, I.; Medeni, T. Assessing the feasibility of blockchain technology in industries: Evidence from Turkey. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2021, 34, 746–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Chen, Z.; Lin, F.; Zhuang, P. Effective management for blockchain-based agri-food supply chains using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 36008–36018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maity, M.; Tolooie, A.; Sinha, A.K.; Tiwari, M.K. Stochastic batch dispersion model to optimize traceability and enhance transparency using Blockchain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 154, 107134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiong, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Chen, E. Development and assessment of blockchain-IoT-based traceability system for frozen aquatic product. J. Food Process. Eng. 2021, 44, e13669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rainero, C.; Modarelli, G. Food tracking and blockchain-induced knowledge: A corporate social responsibility tool for sustainable decision-making. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 4284–4308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, F.; Nicoletti, L.; Padovano, A. Estimating the impact of blockchain adoption in the food processing industry and supply chain. Int. J. Food Eng. 2019, 16, 20190109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vangala, A.; Das, A.K.; Kumar, N.; Alazab, M. Smart secure sensing for IoT-based agriculture: Blockchain perspective. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 17591–17607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamil, F.; Ibrahim, M.; Ullah, I.; Kim, S.; Kahng, H.K.; Kim, D.H. Optimal smart contract for autonomous greenhouse environment based on IoT blockchain network in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 192, 106573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köhler, S.; Pizzol, M. Technology assessment of blockchain-based technologies in the food supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Ouyang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Ni, X.; Han, X.; Wang, F.Y. Blockchain-enabled smart contracts: Architecture, applications, and future trends. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2019, 49, 2266–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savelyev, A. Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law. Inf. Commun. Technol. Law 2017, 26, 116–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juels, A.; Kosba, A.; Shi, E. The ring of gyges: Investigating the future of criminal smart contracts. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 October 2016; pp. 283–295. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investor Bulletin: Initial Coin Offerings. July 2017; Volume 25. Available online: https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bulletins/ib_coinofferings (accessed on 5 July 2022).
- Caridi, M.; Moretto, A.; Perego, A.; Tumino, A. The benefits of supply chain visibility: A value assessment model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 151, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guinée, J.; Heijungs, R. Introduction to life cycle assessment. In Sustainable Supply Chains: A Research-Based Textbook on Operations and Strategy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 15–41. [Google Scholar]
- Rebitzer, G.; Ekvall, T.; Frischknecht, R.; Hunkeler, D.; Norris, G.; Rydberg, T.; Schmidt, W.P.; Suh, S.; Weidema, B.P.; Pennington, D.W. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 701–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eccles, R.G.; Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Manag. Sci. 2014, 60, 2835–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flammer, C. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Acad. Manag. J. 2013, 56, 758–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Paper | Scope | Methodology |
---|---|---|
[17] | Technical review of blockchains | Surveys and case studies |
[18] | Application-based review of blockchains in various spheres of activity | Comprehensive review |
[19] | Application-based review of blockchains in various spheres of activity | Systematic literature review |
[20] | Blockchain and IoT in precision agriculture | General review of scope and technicalities |
[21] | Trend analysis and future scope of blockchains. | Bibliometric study |
Our study | Pillars of food security and the effects of BCT adoption | Systematic literature review and content analysis |
Food Reference | Goal | Advantage | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Beef [22] | Quality assurance for consumer’s choice | Informed policy making | Traceability |
Halal Food [23] | Trusted information throughout the FSC | Guarantee of food safety and data protection | Reliability |
Tea [24] | Steer stakeholder attitudes to adopt sustainable production | Healthy competition | Transparency |
Fish [25] | Tracing Shellfish quality | Improve food safety management | Quality |
Olive Oil [26] | Tracing food prices while ensuring bi-direction communication between the company and the consumer | Easy integration with existing systems and technologies | Fraud prevention |
Rice [27] | Tracing source and giving credit to farmers | Greater sense of appreciation for farmers | Provenance |
Agri-food [28] | Allow quality to be certified | Retailers can justify the sale of “Premium Vegetables” | Better food pricing |
Dairy [29] | Create a supply chain void of data silos | Giving privacy to individual stakeholders while also ensuring disclosure of necessary data | Management |
Soybean [30] | Security through transparency and brand imaging | Consumer loyalty | Trust |
Sugar [31] | Increase competitiveness | SC resilience | Traceability |
Eggs [32] | Ensuring food safety | Improve food safety | Fraud prevention |
Aspect of Food Security | Problem | Solution | Result and Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Availability | |||
Social barrier | Ensuring there is no corruption | More reliable and secure transactions and ledger keeping | Healthy supply chain practices [74,75,76] |
Establishing direct B2B and B2C channels | Reduced transaction costs and increased transaction capacity | Establish various sales models [77,78] | |
Ensuring farmers are paid regardless of gender | Promote fair practices using blockchain | Farmer recognition and increased self-esteem [79] | |
Food loss | Encouraging stakeholders to reduce food loss/waiting in supply chain inefficiencies | Public, immutable, ordered ledger with appropriate information | Reduced food losses [75,80,81] |
Encouraging responsible consumption with a tokenized reward system | Blockchain-based token rewards for responsible buying | Increased public participation towards sustainable alternatives [82,83] | |
Accessibility | |||
Food infrastructure | Efficient food trading and distribution system | Decentralized food procurement and transaction system | Zero dependence on one body for procurement [84,85,86] |
Smoothing customs/air/rail/port/checking processes | Blockchain-based smart contracts for verifying documentation | Reduced waiting/inspection time [77,87] | |
Stability | |||
Food price | Bringing transparency: price that reflects the quality | Traceable supply chain | Consumer trust and reduced price volatility [29] |
Access to market data | Permissioned access to data without compromising security and privacy | Tokenized access based on KYC credentials issued in a blockchain system | Earn monetary benefits for sharing data [88,89,90] |
Funding for food safety net programs | Democratized platform for funding socio-economically viable, sustainable projects | Blockchain-based crowdfunding and ICO | Reduces financial burden on governmental institutions [91,92] |
Utilization | |||
Nutrition labeling | Consumers need more information (country of origin, date of manufacturing, method of cultivation, etc.) | Blockchain-based QR Code stickers on food products | Integration with existing technologies and increased loyalty [93,94] |
Nutrition monitoring | Both consumers and public institution need mechanisms to monitor freshness of food | Blockchain of things (IoT-based solution secured by blockchain) | Increased brand loyalty and public health [14,95,96] |
Natural resource | Land deforestation | Verifiable afforestation schemes and sustainable business models | Consumers can vote with their money [82,97] |
Ground water depletion | |||
Marine bio-diversity depletion | Strengthening the food–water–energy nexus. | Opportunities to monitor, track carbon emissions, energy consumption, transactions, etc. [98,99] | |
Energy depletion |
Theme | Disciplines Involved | Result | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Adoption of Digital Technologies in Food System | Technology adoption theory, adoption diffusion theory | Greater access to market forces and control | [106,107,108] |
Behavioral psychology, human–computer systems | Better production/consumption awareness | [109,110,111] | |
Effects of Digitization on Stakeholder Identity, Farmer Skills | Gender studies, farming studies, geo-political studies | Data-driven management may replace farming’s “hands-on” and experience-driven management style as a result of digitization | [112,113,114] |
Identity theory, assemblage theory, institution theory | Major cultural impact on stakeholder identity | [115,116,117] | |
Power, Ethics in Digitalizing Agricultural Production Systems and Ownership, Privacy | Legal Frameworks, technology ethics, governance | Computer codes that produce understandable smart contracts | [118,119,120,121] |
Cost benefit modelling, optimization | Smart contracts built-in with optimal level of accepted governance logic | [122,123,124,125] | |
Knowledge Management and Innovation in Agri-Food Industry | Economics, management theory, value chain theory | Value and impact of food is extracted in the value chain—both downstream and upstream | [126,127,128] |
Risk analysis, innovation systems | Evaluate, assess, and analyze wider acceptance of technology | [129,130,131] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
George, W.; Al-Ansari, T. Review of Blockchain Applications in Food Supply Chains. Blockchains 2023, 1, 34-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains1010004
George W, Al-Ansari T. Review of Blockchain Applications in Food Supply Chains. Blockchains. 2023; 1(1):34-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains1010004
Chicago/Turabian StyleGeorge, William, and Tareq Al-Ansari. 2023. "Review of Blockchain Applications in Food Supply Chains" Blockchains 1, no. 1: 34-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains1010004