**Correction: Bartha et al. How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative Analysis.** *Nutrients* **2022,** *14***, 1300**

**Valentin Bartha 1,2,\*, Lea Exner <sup>2</sup> , Anna-Lisa Meyer <sup>3</sup> , Maryam Basrai <sup>3</sup> , Daniela Schweikert <sup>4</sup> , Michael Adolph <sup>4</sup> , Thomas Bruckner <sup>5</sup> , Christian Meller <sup>2</sup> , Johan Peter Woelber 6,† and Diana Wolff 1,†**


**Citation:** Bartha, V.; Exner, L.; Meyer, A.-L.; Basrai, M.; Schweikert, D.; Adolph, M.; Bruckner, T.; Meller, C.; Woelber, J.P.; Wolff, D. Correction: Bartha et al. How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative Analysis. *Nutrients* 2022, *14*, 1300. *Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, 1845. https:// doi.org/10.3390/nu14091845

Received: 30 March 2022 Accepted: 24 April 2022 Published: 28 April 2022

**Publisher's Note:** MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Copyright:** © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

## **Error in Figures**

The authors would like to make a correction in a recently published paper [1]. There were errors in Figures 1, 2 and 4. In the original Figures, there are missing lines, arrows, boxes, colours and confidence intervals due to the incompatibilities between different computer operating systems. *Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 4

Original Figure 1:


New Figure 1:

Equilibration phase (2 weeks)

Screening

*T*0 (Start of intervention)

Study phase 1 (2 weeks)

Study phase 2 (4 weeks)

*T*2

Original Figure 2:

We would like it to be corrected as shown below.

*T*1 Diet assessment: 24dr (four days)

MedD training 2x for 90 minutes before T0, 2x for 60 minutes after T0

Mediterranean Diet Usual diet

Clinical examination: BOP, GI, PI Diet assessment: 24dr (four days), DEGS-FFQ, MEDAS

Clinical examination: BOP, GI, PI Diet assessment: MEDAS, DEGS-FFQ

MedD Control (C)

We would like it to be corrected as shown below. New Figure 1: New Figure 1:

We would like it to be corrected as shown below.

*Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 4


#### Original Figure 2: Original Figure 2:

*Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 4

n=83 assessed for eligibility

n=42 allocated to MedD or C group

n=2 declined further participation

New Figure 2:

Original Figure 4:

*T*1: 24dr n=12

24dr n=12

n=18 analyzed: *T*0: clinical data n= 18; FFQ n=18; MEDAS n=18

n=23 allocated to MedD n=3 denied participation due to coronavirus pandemic

*T*2: clinical data n=18; FFQ n=18; MEDAS n=18;

n=28 did not meet the inclusion criteria

n=19 allocated to control

n=19 analyzed: *T*0: clinical data n=19; FFQ n=19; MEDAS n=19

*T*2: clinical data n=19; FFQ n=19; MEDAS n=18;

*T*1: 24dr n=12

24dr n=12

n=13 declined participation

**Reference**

Analysis. *Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, 1300.

#### New Figure 2: New Figure 2:

*Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 4

#### Original Figure 4: Original Figure 4:

New Figure 4:

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 m g/d

10 20 30 40 g/d

50 100 150 200 250 m g/d

0.387

These changes have no impact on the conclusions of the paper. The published version

will be updated on the article webpage, with a reference to this correction notice.

**Conflicts of Interest:** All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

1. Bartha, V.; Exner, L.; Meyer, A.‐L.; Basrai, M.; Schweikert, D.; Adolph, M.; Bruckner, T.; Meller, C.; Woelber, J.P.; Wolff, D. How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.

#### New Figure 4: New Figure 4:

M ED AS

0

M ED AS

5

10

15

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 rel.

0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 m g/d

5

10

15

*Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 4

M ED AS

M ED AS

5

10

15

rel. PUFA / total fat dietary fiber vitamin C

Spearman ρ 0.774\*

Spearman ρ 0.533\*

10

15

5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 g/d

> 10 20 30 40 g/d

M ED AS

M ED AS

10

15

5

Spearman ρ 0.441\*

Spearman ρ 0.478\*

10

15

5

0 100 200 300 400 500 m g/d

> 50 100 150 200 250 m g/d

Spearman ρ 0.387

Spearman ρ 0.453\*

These changes have no impact on the conclusions of the paper. The published version will be updated on the article webpage, with a reference to this correction notice. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

#### **Reference**

Analysis. *Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, 1300.

**Conflicts of Interest:** All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. **Reference** 1. Bartha, V.; Exner, L.; Meyer, A.-L.; Basrai, M.; Schweikert, D.; Adolph, M.; Bruckner, T.; Meller, C.; Woelber, J.P.; Wolff, D. How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative Analysis. *Nutrients* **2022**, *14*, 1300. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

1. Bartha, V.; Exner, L.; Meyer, A.‐L.; Basrai, M.; Schweikert, D.; Adolph, M.; Bruckner, T.; Meller, C.; Woelber, J.P.; Wolff, D. How to Measure Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in Dental Studies: Is a Short Adherence Screener Enough? A Comparative

**Funding:** This research received no external funding.
