5.1. Comparative Studies on Crack Detection in Concrete
Based on the results of the preliminary experiments, the potential of the present imaging system for NDT inspection was investigated. First, a comparison study with system- B was conducted to detect the cracks between concrete blocks under glass fiber-reinforced (GFR) tape and a coat of black acrylic paint. The results of this experiment are shown in
Figure 6a through
Figure 6d. As shown in
Figure 6a, two concrete blocks were firmly bonded together, and GFR tape and a coat of black acrylic paint were applied over a portion of the cracks to hide the crack areas.
Figure 6b is a magnified photograph taken to show the width of the cracks. As can be seen from this photograph, the width of the crack is approximately 0.1 mm.
Figure 6c shows the MM-wave image observed with system-A. It can be seen that the cracks are visible in the image below the GFR-taped areas. On the other hand,
Figure 6d shows the result with system-B. In this case, the coating paint itself is transparent, but the GFR tape is not sufficiently transparent and the cracks in the underlying concrete are not visible.
The detection of cracks caused on the surface of concrete infrastructure facilities is one of the most important issues in NDT, and as shown in
Figure 6c,d, we can observe the cracks on the exposed surface areas of concrete blocks. On the surface of the concrete blocks, which does not have a smooth surface like a copper plate, the incident MM waves are scattered uniformly in all directions and reflected with some intensity (backscattering) in the direction of incidence. As a result, unlike objects with smooth surfaces, an overall dark image is observed. However, in the areas with cracks, since the incident MM waves are scattered more strongly and irregularly, the intensity of refracted MM waves returning in the directions of the receive antennas would be much smaller, which would be reflected as darker lines in the MM-wave image.
On the other hand, in the area with GFR tape and black acrylic paint on the surface, we could see cracks hidden under these coverings only with the present system-A with high sensitivity. Incidentally, the contrast in the raw photographic data was adjusted so that the viewer could see where the GFR tape was applied in
Figure 6a. From these two MM-wave images, there is almost no change in the received signal intensity for the black acrylic paint, but the signal intensities are weaker in the areas of the GFR tape, confirming that absorption by the GFR tape has occurred. To be sure, contrast-adjusted photographs are shown in the upper left corner of
Figure 6c,d. Here, the contrast has been adjusted to show the crack structure most clearly. As can be seen from this photograph in
Figure 6c, the MM wave image observed using system-B did not show the crack structure hidden under the GFR tape, no matter what adjustments were made.
We also tried to make measurements under more severe conditions that would reduce the spatial resolution and signal intensity. In this experiment, measurements were made with a fairly thick top coat of acrylic paint and at a distance of
LA = 3038 mm from the radar to the concrete blocks. For comparison, a crack-free concrete block with GFR tape attached to the bottom half of the block and a thick layer of acrylic paint applied over it was also prepared for simultaneous measurement.
Figure 6e shows a photograph of these two targets placed at
LA = 3038 mm.
Figure 6f shows the MM-wave reflection images observed at these target surface locations. In the MM-wave image observed on the cracked concrete blocks, the spatial resolution appears to be slightly lower, but the cracks and chips in the block are more clearly visible than in the case of
LA = 780 mm. Furthermore, it can be seen that no such traces were observed in the concrete blocks without cracks. Although the concrete surfaces of infrastructure facilities are generally protected by reinforcing sheets and paint in many cases, the highly sensitive MM-wave imaging system developed in this study proved to be sufficiently useful for detecting cracks that are not visible on such objects.
Let us now consider why 0.1 mm wide cracks can be detected using MM waves with a wavelength of about 4 mm. According to Ref. [
27], the horizontal and vertical cross-range resolutions
and
in SAR imaging are given as follows:
where
= 3.80 mm is the wavelength at the center frequency of 78.8 GHz in the chirp signal. Therefore, considering the case of
LA = 780 mm, the following values can be obtained as the cross-range resolution:
= 1.19 mm and
= 1.41 mm. As for
, it cannot be less than 0.5∆ (=1.4 mm), which is the minimum vertical motion interval of the receive antenna Rx. Similarly, for
LA = 3038 mm,
is 4.62 mm. Looking at the
values, both are very large compared to the actual crack width of 0.1 mm, which would make it difficult to detect such narrow cracks, but they are observed. In general, if there are cracks or defects on the surface of an object, the surface irregularities will interfere with the reflection of the MM waves, changing the scattering pattern and reducing the radar cross-section. This causes the received signal strength to decrease in the range of
around the crack or defect, and if this change can be detected with high sensitivity, the presence or absence and location of the defect can be confirmed. Therefore, although a spatial resolution of about one wavelength is necessary for non-destructive and non-contact inspection using MM waves, SNR is considered more important. One of the advantages of MM-wave imaging is that microdefects and cracks as small as 0.1 mm can be observed as an image spread over a few millimeters of the wavelength of the MM wave. This is because non-destructive inspections of infrastructure facilities are generally performed over a relatively large area of several meters, and if, for example, point or line defects with a spread of several millimeters (>1/1000) appear in an inspection image of an area of several meters squared, the possibility of the presence of a defect can be immediately suspected. On the other hand, in inspections using visible light, which has a short wavelength and allows for high-resolution observation, defects that are larger than the wavelength of the light (<1 µm) will appear in the observed image as their actual size. In other words, defects as small as about 0.1 mm (<1/10,000) will appear as dots or lines on an inspection image of an area of several square meters. It is considered extremely difficult to detect the presence or absence of minute defects in such an observed image.
The validity of such an idea is evident from the crack images in the MM-wave images in
Figure 6c,f. Comparing the crack images in
Figure 6c,f, it is obvious that the image in
Figure 6c shows a finer crack structure. However, in terms of signal intensity and contrast of these images, the signal intensity is higher, and the presence of cracks can be observed more clearly in
Figure 6f, even though the measurement distance is about four times longer. At a distance of
L = 3038 mm, the elevation angle from the transmit antenna Tx7 to the point in front of the receive antenna Rx8 on the concrete surface is only 0.6 degrees. Thus, it can be seen that both transmission and reception are carried out using a signal of almost maximum gain. This indicates that the newly developed radar module with high directivity and high gain is very useful for non-destructive, non-contact, and safer remote inspection of concrete structures at risk of collapse due to aging or natural disasters. Furthermore, it can be seen that in this type of non-destructive testing using MM waves, it is necessary to develop a compact system with signal strength rather than resolution, i.e., high SNR.
Another interesting result is that although the observation with system-A was made by placing the concrete blocks at a very close distance of
LA = 780 mm from the radar module, no significant difference in signal intensities appeared, as shown in the MM-wave images of a copper plate. Although a periodic dark and light wide stripe structure is observed approximately equal to the total length of the array of eight receiving antennas (8∆ = 26 mm), the signal is not extremely weak, as shown in
Figure 3b,c. This is because the surface of the concrete blocks is not perfectly smooth, and the incident waves scattered by the surface are reflected to some extent in the direction of the receive antenna and detected. This indicates that the MM-wave radar inspection method is fully applicable to the non-destructive inspection of structures with such surfaces.
In this section, we investigated the detection of surface cracks that may occur in common concrete structures such as tunnels and buildings. The next section reports the results of experiments conducted on a concrete slab and a thin concrete slab to evaluate the transmission performance of MM waves against concrete.
5.2. Evaluation of Transmission Performance Using a Concrete Slab
To evaluate the performance of MM-wave transmission to concrete, a reinforced concrete (RC) slab with a steel frame of D13 (ϕ12.7 mm) was prepared, as shown in
Figure 7. It is difficult to see here, but steel frames #1 and #5~#8 are straight, and the other steel frames #2~#4 are bent near the center. The amount of bending increases from #2 to #4. The assembled steel frames were placed in wooden frames and poured with concrete, and this RC slab was removed and measured after the concrete had sufficiently dried and hardened.
Figure 8 shows the photograph of the RC slab and its MM-wave images.
Figure 8a shows the surface of the measured RC slab. The measurements were made on the surface corresponding to the bottom of the RC slab in
Figure 7. It can be seen that the entire steel frame of #1 is visible, while the central regions of steel frames #2~#4 are partially buried under the concrete.
Figure 8b–d shows the MM-wave images observed at a distance of
L = 1000 mm,
L = 2000 mm, and
L = 3050 mm, respectively. The horizontal stripe structure of light and dark observed at
L = 1000 mm disappears as the distance
L increases from
L = 1000 mm to
L = 3050 mm. In addition, the steel frame of #3, which is moderately bent among the steel frames of #2~#4, becomes more visible in the MM-wave images with increasing distance. However, only the two ends are weakly imaged for the steel frame of #4, which has the largest bending even at the distance of
L = 3050 mm. This is because the incident waves are attenuated inside the concrete, and the reflected wave from the inclined targets hardly returns to the receive antenna. In addition, we could not observe anything at all about steel frames #5~#8, which are mounted under steel frames #1~#4 and buried at least 13 mm under the concrete surface. This is discussed in the next section by estimating the attenuation distance
of MM waves in concrete.
On the other hand, we can see more detailed structures of the steel frame of #1 in the MM-wave image, as shown in the inset photo of
Figure 8d. The MM-wave image in
Figure 8d shows the most sensitive and clear image, reflecting the steel frames inside the concrete. Calculating the elevation angle
[
L3050,
d32] from Tx7 to the target in front of Rx8, it is about 0.6 degrees. This result indicates that the measurement was made using the central regions with the highest beam power. In general, non-destructive and non-contact inspection is highly desirable in any kind of inspection of infrastructure facilities and residential buildings, because such inspection can ensure the life safety of measurement technicians, especially when inspecting buildings after a major earthquake.
5.3. Estimation of Attenuation Distance of MM Waves to Concrete26
To discuss the observed results on the RC slab, let us estimate the attenuation distance
of MM waves to concrete materials by using basic electromagnetic formulas [
28]. The real part of the complex permittivity
in the MM-wave frequency range is reported to be
= 5~10 and
= 0.2~1 [
29,
30,
31,
32]. Therefore, if we calculate the complex refractive index
using the intermediate values
and
, we can estimate
and
. Using these values of
and
, we can estimate the reflectance
R of MM waves under the condition of the air–concrete interface in the normal incidence of MM waves. First, the reflectance
R is estimated to be about 22%. In addition, the absorption coefficient
(and attenuation distance
) in concrete is estimated to be
mm
−1 (and
mm) at 80 GHz. Here, the attenuation distance
mm explains well why the steel frames #5~#8 could not appear in the MM-wave images at all.
Based on the estimated value of 5.4 mm, we prepared a concrete slab of about 3.7 mm thickness and attempted transmission measurements to demonstrate the actual transmission performance of MM waves to a concrete slab.
5.4. Evaluation of Transmission Performance Using a Thin Concrete Slab
While all MM-wave images presented so far have been single reflection images of the target, the SAR imaging technique using FMCW radar converts the obtained IF signal into a range FFT signal, so that a 2D cross-sectional image (2D slice image) can be obtained at any distance in front of the MM-wave radar module [
13]. Therefore, if there is some target of interest behind an object through which MM waves can penetrate, the reflection image of the target can also be observed. Therefore, as shown in
Figure 9a, a thin concrete slab with a thickness of 3.7 mm was prepared and placed at
L = 3100 mm in front of the radar module, and a copper plate was placed at
L = 3185 mm behind it, and the transmission performance of MM waves through concrete was investigated by observing the reflection image of the copper plate.
Figure 9b shows the MM-wave image of the concrete surface at
L = 3100 mm, and
Figure 9c shows the MM-wave image at
L = 3185 mm corresponding to the surface of the copper plate behind the concrete slab. As can be seen from
Figure 9a, the uppermost part of the copper plate protrudes from the concrete slab and is exposed, so
Figure 9c shows that the signal intensity in this exposed area is considerably higher than in other areas. Therefore, the attenuation distance of the concrete was calculated by comparing the received signal intensity from the uppermost part of the copper plate and the hidden part behind the concrete in this experiment.
To compare the signal intensities from both parts, the averaged signal intensities along the
X-axis direction in area-1 and area-2 in
Figure 10a were used. The distribution of the averaged intensity
in area-1 and area-2 are shown in
Figure 10b. The maximum averaged signal intensity in the area-1 (
) was about 1670. On the other hand, that in-area-2 (
) is about 300. We will use these values to determine the experimental attenuation distance
in the prepared concrete slab. In determining the attenuation distance
, let the reflectance
R of MM waves on the concrete surface be 0.22 and the reflectance of MM waves on the copper plate surface be
RCu. When the signal intensity transmitted from the Tx7 is
I0, the received signal intensity
reflected directly from the copper plate can be expressed as follows:
It is assumed here that all returned signals are received. Using (11), the intensity
, which is the signal received after passing through the thin concrete slab twice, can be expressed as follows:
Using (11) and (12),
can be obtained as follows:
The result obtained by this experiment is almost the same as the estimated value of mm, which indicates the difficulty in investigating deeper internal structures from the concrete surface.
However, the distance L of the target was limited to a maximum of about 3200 mm due to space limitations in the laboratory. In addition, only eight receive antennas were used to obtain better MM-wave images in the present study. Therefore, if we have a large laboratory space where we can observe at a distance of L = 10 m, and if we use all antenna elements of the array for measurements, we can expect a significant improvement in SNR. This would also make it possible to obtain transmission images of thicker concrete.
5.5. Evaluation of Transmission Performance Using Residential Wall Materials
As an important NDT technology in Japan, which is an earthquake-prone country, several observations have been made on the transmission performance of MM waves through composite plywood, refractory board, and ceramic tiles used for walls and other surfaces in residential houses.
Figure 11a shows the arrangement of the composite plywood and the copper plate placed at
L = 3110 mm and
L = 3225 mm, respectively.
Figure 11b,c show the MM-wave images of the inside of the composite plywood at
L = 3120 mm and the surface of the copper plate at
L = 3225 mm, respectively. As can be seen from the MM-wave images, the composite plywood can transmit MM waves with almost no power loss when the thickness is about 12 mm. On the other hand, the faint streaks along the inserted arrows in
Figure 11b become thicker and more distinct streaks in
Figure 11c. Since there are no such streaks on both surfaces of the composite plywood, an inner sheet of the composite plywood may have some cracks or scratches. It is assumed that the scattering of MM waves caused by these cracks or scratches inside the composite plywood dramatically reduces the amount of MM-wave radiation to the copper plate directly behind the cracks or scratches.
Next, to confirm that MM waves are indeed effective in detecting damage as small as a few tens of µm, the detection performance was first evaluated using cracks that, unlike the concrete cracks in
Figure 6, cannot be visually confirmed by humans at a distance.
Figure 12a shows a refractory board of 5 mm width, which was completely cracked for use in this measurement. After splitting, the board was mounted so that the cracks were not visible, so it is difficult to see in this picture, but it can be seen that the crack runs down the left side. The width of the crack is only tens of µm in width, as shown in the inset.
Figure 11b shows the MM-wave image observed on the surface of this refractory board. The ratio to the 300 mm wide board size shows that a crack structure of tens of µm width is observed as a crack image of about 8 mm width, which corresponds well to the actual crack position.
Now consider what happens when two boards are completely pasted together, since the range resolution
of the FMCW radar is given by using the frequency bandwidth
B = 4.5 GHz and the speed of light
c as follows:
This result means that even if a 2D slice image corresponding to a distance of L = 3080 mm is cut out from the range FFT analysis results, it will also be affected by objects in the range of 16.5 mm in front and behind it. Therefore, if this refractory board were transparent to MM waves, it would be affected not only by MM-wave scattering due to surface cracks but also by scattering due to internal cracks. This could therefore be observed as a larger signal change. Considering this, the penetration length of the concrete slab obtained this time was only about 6 mm, but it would be possible to detect cracks with higher sensitivity if even such a small penetration could be achieved.
Finally, the MM-wave transmission properties of ceramic materials such as ceramic tiles and a refractory board were investigated.
Figure 13a,b show the photographs of 5 mm thick ceramic tiles bonded to the surface of a 5 mm thick refractory board with ceramic adhesives. The surface of the refractory board was engraved with various patterns for the transmission imaging.
Figure 13c shows the MM-wave image at the interface between the ceramic tiles and the refractory board. It can be seen that the patterns on the refractory board are observed by transmission MM-imaging through the ceramic tiles. In addition,
Figure 13d shows the MM-wave image of the copper plate placed at
L = 3220 mm behind the ceramic tiles and refractory board. It can be seen that although the combined thickness of the ceramic tiles and refractory board is 10 mm, the reflective image of the copper plate is well observed, which also reflects the boundary lines between the tile boards and the pattern engraved on the refractory board.
Through these experiments, we were able to demonstrate that the high-sensitivity MM-wave imaging system we developed this time is very effective for NDT inspection of building materials such as residential houses.