Search Results (56)

Patient-matched implants (PMIs) enable precise anatomical reconstruction but often introduce unforeseen intraoperative challenges that can provoke stress, reduce frustration tolerance, and influence surgical decision-making. Despite the growing clinical use of PMIs, the behavioural and psychological dimensions underpinning these challenging surgeries remain underexplored. This study examined the relationship between surgeon temperament, specifically frustration tolerance threshold, patience, and adherence to planned surgical workflows during PMI procedures. A qualitative thematic study was conducted over 22 months across two academic centres and 86 private surgical practices in South Africa. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with consultant surgeons, assistant surgeons, surgical technologists, and biomedical engineers, supplemented by direct observation and detailed field notes. Inductive content analysis, thematic coding, and descriptive quantitative trends derived from Likert-style questionnaires were used to identify behavioural patterns associated with intraoperative stress and workflow deviation. Participant reports indicated that low frustration tolerance, often expressed as impatience, was perceived to be linked to increased deviations from surgical plans, including implant modification (reported in 4.6% of the 86 practices), even when design and fit were optimal. In 2.3% of the 86 practices surveyed, surgical team members reported incidents where impatience was perceived to have compromised patient safety. Stress inoculation theory and emotional intelligence frameworks offered explanatory models for the observed behaviours. Within the limits of this exploratory qualitative study, surgeon temperament—particularly mental preparedness and frustration tolerance—emerged as a recurring theme associated with intraoperative PMI workflow adherence. Whether these factors are determinants of workflow adherence whilst using high-fidelity PMIs, or merely correlated with other unmeasured variables, remains to be tested in future quantitative research. Full article

Rural hospitals are essential access points for healthcare delivery in the United States, yet they continue to experience disproportionate rates of closure and service disruption that threaten community health, economic stability, and equity. This rapid systematic review synthesizes recent peer-reviewed evidence examining rural hospital closures and service disruptions, with emphasis on financial, policy, workforce, and performance-related factors and their downstream impacts. Guided by PRISMA methodology, four databases were searched for U.S.-based studies published between January 2024 and June 2025. Following screening and consensus-based review, 59 articles met inclusion criteria. Across studies, financial vulnerability, characterized by revenue instability, low patient volumes, unfavorable payer mix, and reliance on non-operating revenue, emerged as a dominant precursor to closure and service reductions. Policy context, particularly Medicaid expansion status, telehealth and broadband infrastructure, and reimbursement adequacy, strongly shaped hospital sustainability. Closures and service disruptions were consistently associated with increased travel distances, reduced access to maternal, surgical, mental health, and chronic care services, higher prices at surviving hospitals, and increased strain on remaining providers. Workforce shortages further compounded these challenges. Collectively, findings demonstrate that rural hospital closures reflect interconnected structural weaknesses rather than isolated organizational failure. Coordinated policy action, targeted financial stabilization, workforce development, and technology-enabled care models are necessary to mitigate continued erosion of rural healthcare access. Full article

Environmental disturbances from hospital demolition and construction can aerosolise pathogenic fungal spores, particularly those of Aspergillus species, posing a serious threat to immunocompromised patients. This paper presents a structured narrative review of representative case studies to evaluate the relationship between demolition activities and airborne Aspergillus exposure, with a focus on clinical risk and environmental monitoring. Three exemplar studies were selected to illustrate high-intensity short-duration demolition, prolonged mechanical demolition, and meteorologically integrated risk assessment. By examining these cases, this review identifies gaps in current knowledge, methodological limitations, and challenges in causal attribution. The analysis supports the development of a novel conceptual framework for assessing and managing Aspergillus-related risks during hospital redevelopment, offering a structured approach to future infection prevention and control strategies. This framework is intended as a conceptual tool to support evidence-informed decision-making while acknowledging the limitations inherent in a targeted narrative review rather than a systematic synthesis. Full article

Cancer center infusion departments are often challenged with scheduling a large number of patients while having a limited number of nurses available to administer the infusions. Cancer patients have different acuity levels depending on many factors, such as treatment plans, drug side effects, and health status. Thus, several factors need to be considered when assigning patients to nurses, as unbalanced nurse-to-patient assignments affect patient flow and nurse workload. This study introduces a mixed-integer programming model for nurse–patient assignments that minimizes patient wait times while ensuring workload balance among oncology nurses, while addressing the limited attention in existing studies to jointly modeling patient acuity and nurse continuity. The model also explores the effects of maintaining nurse continuity for patients desiring the same nurse throughout their treatments. Because the mixed-integer programming model can become difficult to solve when there are many cancer patients, an alternative nurse–patient assignment heuristic is proposed and evaluated. Numerical examples based on data from a regional cancer center compare the effectiveness and performance of the exact and heuristic methods. The results show that patient wait time and workload variation among nurses increase when there is a stronger requirement to maintain nurse continuity, which could negatively affect both patient and nurse satisfaction. This study provides valuable insights into the nurse–patient assignment problem and helps cancer infusion centers determine the impacts of maintaining different levels of nurse continuity in their settings. Full article

Background: Medication nonadherence among patients with chronic diseases represents a major challenge in healthcare systems worldwide and is associated with poor clinical outcomes, increased hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs. Patient-drug related factors such as knowledge of treatment, beliefs about medication, and the experience of side effects may significantly influence adherence behaviour. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted among 80 patients receiving treatment for chronic conditions at a primary healthcare facility in South Africa. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a standardized questionnaire that assessed demographic characteristics and patient-drug-related factors potentially associated with medication adherence. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Version 30.0.0.0 (172). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics, while inferential analyses, including chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests, were applied to determine associations between demographic variables, patient-drug related factors, and medication nonadherence. Results: The majority of participants were female, aged between 41 and 50 years, single, unemployed, and had completed secondary education. Most participants lived in rural areas, and HIV/AIDS was the most commonly reported chronic condition. Significant associations with medication nonadherence were identified for the experience of medication side effects and inadequate knowledge about treatment. These factors demonstrated moderate effect sizes and suggest that both clinical and educational aspects of treatment may influence adherence behaviour. Conclusions: Patient-drug related factors, particularly medication side effects and insufficient knowledge regarding treatment, play a significant role in medication nonadherence among patients with chronic conditions in primary care settings. Interventions aimed at improving patient education, counselling regarding medication side effects, and strengthening patient-provider communication may help improve adherence and treatment outcomes. Full article

Background: Patient safety is evaluated using both internal assessments of safety culture and external hospital rating systems; however, the extent to which these measures capture related dimensions of patient safety remains uncertain. Methods: This study examined the association between hospital patient safety culture ratings and hospital safety grades. Using 2024 hospital-level data, patient safety culture was measured using the overall safety rating from the AHRQ Hospital Survey on patient safety culture and hospital safety grades derived from Leapfrog Safety Grades. Results: No significant association was observed between patient safety culture ratings and the likelihood of receiving higher Leapfrog Grades. Hospital bed size, however, was significantly associated with Leapfrog Grades, with larger hospitals demonstrating lower odds of receiving higher grades. Conclusions: These findings indicate that further research is needed to assess congruence between internal perceptions of patient safety culture and external hospital safety ratings. The results underscore potential measurement differences between federal survey-based assessments and private nonprofit grading methodologies and suggest caution in assuming equivalence across patient safety metrics. Further research is warranted to clarify how these tools align and to determine their respective roles in evaluating hospital patient safety. Full article

Preventing inpatient falls remains challenging for healthcare institutions globally, including in Singapore. Integrating technological innovations into fall prevention measures may optimize inpatient care and improve health outcomes. A multiphase study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, employing a human-centred design (HCD) approach to develop a technology-based inpatient fall prevention system (IFPS). The four phases include (1) pre-design observations and focus groups, (2) feature prioritization and wireframe development, (3) prototype testing and safety assessments, and (4) post-design staff training and feedback collection. The developed IFPS integrated artificial intelligence (AI) video analytics for bed-exit prediction with communication devices and autonomous commode delivery to facilitate ward communication and reduce staff workload. This paper describes the development process and user evaluation of the IFPS to assess its operational usability and safety. Potential users of the IFPS, such as ward nurses and patients, suggested features for the IFPS during the pre-design phase and thereafter evaluated the system through focus group discussions and/or feedback surveys. Pre-design focus group participants (n = 24) emphasized durability and user-friendliness requirements, informing system design. When evaluating the system, nurse users (n = 39) perceived the IFPS as effective in reducing falls (65%), enabling them to perform other duties (85%), and allowing them to remain with patients without searching for a commode (64%). Patient users (n = 21) found pre-recorded messages effective (91%), though communication clarity varied. Engaging healthcare workers in IFPS development offered valuable context-based insights, highlighting the importance of addressing technology acceptance factors early to promote adoption of fall prevention technologies in acute care settings. Full article

This study analyzed environmental noise levels in neonatal hospital units, including both low- and high-risk nurseries, as well as neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Continuous 24 h measurements over ten days revealed that average sound levels significantly exceeded international recommendations. Hourly $L_{Aeq}$ values frequently reached or surpassed 65 dB, with over 20% of daily recordings exceeding this limit, and in some instances, more than 50%. Heatmaps indicated consistent noise patterns: high-risk nurseries experienced peaks during late morning and afternoon, low-risk nurseries at night, while NICU maintained elevated levels throughout the day. The main sources of noise included alarms, medical equipment, and activity from staff or visitors. This highlights the need for hospital policies aimed at protecting the neurosensory health of neonates. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for creating quieter environments in neonatal care. Full article

This study explores how hospital location (rural/non-rural) may moderate the nurse staffing ratio’s impact on three hospital-acquired infections. This study used data from 2022 to 2024 on nurse staffing and hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and data on hospital-acquired infection rates from the Medicare Care Compare dataset provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. After removing missing values, the final dataset included 7997 hospital-year observations across the US. Independent variables include rural hospital designation, nursing hours per patient day, and RN FTE per adjusted day. The dependent variables included infection rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection, Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple regression was performed in Stata 18. Our research found that across all three infection types, an increase in nursing hours per patient day is significantly associated with a decrease in the infection rate, and that impact was not moderated by hospital rurality. Extra time spent with patients in either a rural or non-rural hospital decreased hospital-acquired infection rates. While RN FTEs were included in the model, total nursing hours per patient day emerged as the more consistent predictor of lower hospital-acquired infection rates. Full article

Healthcare systems operate in safety-critical environments where rapid adaptation and sustained functioning must occur simultaneously, yet existing safety frameworks tend to conceptualise agility and resilience as separate, sequential, or retrospective capabilities. This conceptual separation limits understanding of how safety is enacted during disruption, when healthcare workers and organisations must respond in real time without temporal or structural buffers. This paper introduces agilience as an emerging conceptual construct that captures the concurrent enactment of agility (rapid adaptation) and resilience (sustained functioning, recovery, and learning) under conditions of uncertainty. Drawing on safety science, resilience engineering, organisational theory, and comparative industry literature, this conceptual commentary clarifies how agilience extends existing Safety-I and Safety-II paradigms by addressing the temporal gap between prevention-focused and learning-focused approaches. Agilience is positioned as both an explanatory lens and an aspirational organisational state, highlighting the alignment required between individual adaptive capability and organisational structures to support safe, sustainable care delivery. The paper outlines the defining features, boundaries, and system conditions under which agilience becomes visible, and illustrates its relevance through healthcare examples. By articulating agilience as a distinct conceptual contribution, this work provides a foundation for future empirical investigation, measurement development, and application in healthcare safety management. Full article

Health systems face pressure to strengthen resilience against supply chain disruptions while maintaining cost-effective service delivery. This mixed-methods study describes a pilot project that integrated 3D printing services into a Canadian provincial health authority. Quantitative data were derived from internal clinical engineering work orders, where a scenario-based economic analysis compared original equipment manufacturer (OEM) procurement with modelled 3D-printed parts. Using conservative assumptions, selected non-electronic structural parts were assigned a fixed unit cost. Qualitative data were collected from two focus groups with clinical engineers and other end-users. Results from an exploratory scenario-based economic analysis suggest that substituting selected structurally simple clinical engineering parts with 3D-printed alternatives would be associated with modelled cost impacts ranging from a 67.4% net increase (OEM prices halved and 3D-printing costs doubled) to a 69.6% cost reduction (OEM prices increased by 10% and 3D-printing costs decreased by 20%). Demand changes affected absolute savings but not the percent difference (58.1% under ±50% quantity changes), and a pessimistic procurement scenario (OEM prices decreased by 30% and 3D-printing costs increased by 50%) reduced savings to 10.3%. Focus groups highlighted perceived benefits and implementation challenges associated with integrating additive manufacturing. Implementation was facilitated through an outsourcing model, which was perceived to shift certain responsibilities and risk-management functions to the vendor. Long-term adoption will require clearer communication and targeted education. This pilot study suggests that, under constrained regulatory scope and scenario-based assumptions, additive manufacturing may contribute to supply chain resilience and may be associated with modelled cost advantages for selected low-risk components. Full article

Effective communication in critical care units, such as the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU), is vital for patient safety; however, clinical notes from multiple professionals are often lengthy and complex. This study evaluated the Mistral large language model for summarizing Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit progress notes using the Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, and Synthesis by receiver (I-PASS) framework, a standardized mnemonic for patient handoffs in healthcare. A total of 385 patients were included in the cohort, and all the progress notes associated with each patient were combined into a single document and summarized by the model. The readability was assessed using multiple metrics, including Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning-Fog Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG), Automated Readability Index, and Dale-Chall Score. The readability metrics showed that the summaries generated with the Mistral Large Language Model (LLM) were much more difficult to read than the original notes, requiring a higher reading level. In a small clinician review, junior residents rated the summaries overall more favorably than senior residents, who often identified missing clinical details. Although Mistral condensed the documentation, this reduced readability and some loss of context may limit its usefulness for clinical handoffs. As a preliminary study with a small clinician-reviewed sample, these findings are descriptive and will require validation in larger clinical settings. Full article

The increasing availability of free-text components in electronic medical records (EMRs) offers unprecedented opportunities for machine learning research, enabling improved disease phenotyping, risk prediction, and patient stratification. However, the use of narrative clinical data raises distinct ethical challenges that are not fully addressed by conventional frameworks for structured data. We conducted a narrative review synthesizing conceptual and empirical literature on ethical issues in free-text EMR research, focusing on privacy, fairness, autonomy, interpretability, and governance. We examined technical methods, including de-identification, differential privacy, bias mitigation, and explainable AI, alongside normative approaches, such as participatory design, dynamic consent models, and multi-stakeholder governance. Our analysis highlights persistent risks, including re-identification, algorithmic bias, and inequitable access, as well as limitations in current regulatory guidance across jurisdictions. We propose ethics-by-design principles that integrate ethical reflection into all stages of machine learning research, emphasize relational accountability to patients and stakeholders, and support global harmonization in governance and stewardship. Implementing these principles can enhance transparency, trust, and social value while maintaining scientific rigor. Ethical integration is therefore not optional but essential to ensure that machine learning research using free-text EMRs aligns with both clinical relevance and societal expectations. Full article

This Perspective presents a framework for US hospitals treating foreign patients to reconceptualize international healthcare trade by leveraging all four modes of trade in health services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), which include information exchange (Mode 1), patient travel/medical tourism (Mode 2), commercial presence (Mode 3), and temporary movement of healthcare personnel (Mode 4). This framework illustrates how hospitals could adopt multi-modal approaches and describes the strategic implications for hospitals and their international patient programs. Historically, US hospitals have focused primarily on international patient travel (Mode 2), but this narrow approach creates vulnerability to disruption. Mode 2 exports by US hospitals have not recovered to pre-pandemic levels, making expansion into other modes essential for maintaining competitive advantages while mitigating systemic risks. Diversification into other modes, such as digital health and telemedicine (Mode 1), co-branding and managing facilities (Mode 3) and visiting professorships (Mode 4) are single-mode approaches for diversification. Multi-country clinical trials are an example of cross-border trade that addresses all four modes of GATS. Overall, this perspective provides a new framework for US providers engaged in or considering entry into international markets that does not solely rely on Mode 2 medical tourism but instead adopts a multi-modal, cross-border health service paradigm. Full article

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant potential to enhance operational efficiency and quality in healthcare. However, despite substantial investment, its widespread, sustained implementation is limited, necessitating a thorough risk assessment to overcome current adoption barriers. Methods: This scoping review, guided by the Arksey and Malley framework, systematically mapped 13 articles published between 2019 and 2024, sourced from five major databases (including CINAHL, Medline, and PubMed). A rigorous, systematic process involving independent data charting and critical appraisal, using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool, was implemented, followed by thematic synthesis to address the research questions. Results: AI demonstrates a significant positive impact on both operational efficiency (e.g., optimised resource allocation, reduced waiting times) and patient outcomes (e.g., improved patient-centred, proactive care, and identification of readmission risks). Major implementation hurdles identified include high costs, critical data security and privacy concerns, the risk of algorithmic bias, and significant staff resistance stemming from limited understanding. Conclusions: Healthcare managers must address key challenges related to cost, bias, and staff acceptance to leverage the potential of AI fully. Strategic investments, the implementation of robust data governance frameworks, and comprehensive staff training are crucial steps for mitigating risks and creating a more efficient, patient-centred, and effective healthcare system. Full article