Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Fyn-SH3

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3604 KB  
Article
The Effects of Neuronal Fyn Knockdown in the Hippocampus in the Rat Kainate Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
by Nikhil S. Rao, Marson Putra, Christina Meyer, Sirisha Parameswaran and Thimmasettappa Thippeswamy
Cells 2025, 14(10), 743; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100743 - 19 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1550
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated neuronal and microglial Fyn, a Src family kinase (SFK), and how its interactions with tau contribute to epileptogenesis. Saracatinib, a Fyn/SFK inhibitor, modifies disease progression in rat kainate (KA) epilepsy models. In this study, we investigated neuronal-specific fyn knockdown [...] Read more.
Previous studies have demonstrated neuronal and microglial Fyn, a Src family kinase (SFK), and how its interactions with tau contribute to epileptogenesis. Saracatinib, a Fyn/SFK inhibitor, modifies disease progression in rat kainate (KA) epilepsy models. In this study, we investigated neuronal-specific fyn knockdown effects on Fyn–tau signaling, neurodegeneration, and gliosis using a calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)-promoter-driven adeno-associated viral vector (AAV9)-mediated fyn-shRNA injection in the rat hippocampus. Eight days following AAV administration, rats received repeated low-dose KA injections intraperitoneally to induce status epilepticus (SE). Both fyn-shRNA and control groups showed comparable SE severity, indicating inadequate neuronal fyn knockdown at this timepoint. Two weeks post fyn-shRNA injection, hippocampal Fyn significantly decreased, alongside reductions in NR2B, pNR2BY1472, PSD95, and total tau. There was also a compensatory activation of SFK (pSFKY416:Fyn) and tau hyperphosphorylation (AT8:total tau), negatively correlating with NeuN expression. Proximity ligation assay indicated unchanged Fyn–tau interactions, suggesting tau interactions with alternative SH3 domain proteins. Persistent neuronal loss, astrogliosis, and microgliosis suggested limited effectiveness of neuronal-specific fyn knockdown at this timepoint. An extended-duration fyn knockdown study, or using broad SFK inhibitors such as saracatinib or tau-SH3 blocking peptides, may effectively prevent SE-induced epileptogenesis. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 11049 KB  
Article
Development of FRET Biosensor to Characterize CSK Subcellular Regulation
by Mingxing Ouyang, Yujie Xing, Shumin Zhang, Liting Li, Yan Pan and Linhong Deng
Biosensors 2024, 14(4), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14040206 - 20 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2969
Abstract
C-terminal Src kinase (CSK) is the major inhibitory kinase for Src family kinases (SFKs) through the phosphorylation of their C-tail tyrosine sites, and it regulates various types of cellular activity in association with SFK function. As a cytoplasmic protein, CSK needs be recruited [...] Read more.
C-terminal Src kinase (CSK) is the major inhibitory kinase for Src family kinases (SFKs) through the phosphorylation of their C-tail tyrosine sites, and it regulates various types of cellular activity in association with SFK function. As a cytoplasmic protein, CSK needs be recruited to the plasma membrane to regulate SFKs’ activity. The regulatory mechanism behind CSK activity and its subcellular localization remains largely unclear. In this work, we developed a genetically encoded biosensor based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to visualize the CSK activity in live cells. The biosensor, with an optimized substrate peptide, confirmed the crucial Arg107 site in the CSK SH2 domain and displayed sensitivity and specificity to CSK activity, while showing minor responses to co-transfected Src and Fyn. FRET measurements showed that CSK had a relatively mild level of kinase activity in comparison to Src and Fyn in rat airway smooth muscle cells. The biosensor tagged with different submembrane-targeting signals detected CSK activity at both non-lipid raft and lipid raft microregions, while it showed a higher FRET level at non-lipid ones. Co-transfected receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha (PTPα) had an inhibitory effect on the CSK FRET response. The biosensor did not detect obvious changes in CSK activity between metastatic cancer cells and normal ones. In conclusion, a novel FRET biosensor was generated to monitor CSK activity and demonstrated CSK activity existing in both non-lipid and lipid raft membrane microregions, being more present at non-lipid ones. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nano- and Micro-Technologies in Biosensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3451 KB  
Article
Studying the Interactions of U24 from HHV-6 in Order to Further Elucidate Its Potential Role in MS
by Keng-Shuo Pi, Daria Bortolotti, Yurou Sang, Giovanna Schiuma, Silvia Beltrami, Sabrina Rizzo, Alessandra Bortoluzzi, Eleonora Baldi, A. Louise Creagh, Charles A. Haynes, Roberta Rizzo and Suzana K. Straus
Viruses 2022, 14(11), 2384; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14112384 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3243
Abstract
A number of studies have suggested that human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) may play a role in multiple sclerosis (MS). Three possible hypotheses have been investigated: (1) U24 from HHV-6A (U24-6A) mimics myelin basic protein (MBP) through analogous phosphorylation and interaction with Fyn-SH3; (2) [...] Read more.
A number of studies have suggested that human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) may play a role in multiple sclerosis (MS). Three possible hypotheses have been investigated: (1) U24 from HHV-6A (U24-6A) mimics myelin basic protein (MBP) through analogous phosphorylation and interaction with Fyn-SH3; (2) U24-6A affects endocytic recycling by binding human neural precursor cell (NPC) expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 4-like WW3* domain (hNedd4L-WW3*); and (3) MS patients who express Killer Cell Immunoglobulin Like Receptor 2DL2 (KIR2DL2) on natural killer (NK) cells are more susceptible to HHV-6 infection. In this contribution, we examined the validity of these propositions by investigating the interactions of U24 from HHV-6B (U24-6B), a variant less commonly linked to MS, with Fyn-SH3 and hNedd4L-WW3* using heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) titrations and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). In addition, the importance of phosphorylation and the specific role of U24 in NK cell activation in MS patients were examined. Overall, the findings allowed us to shed light into the models linking HHV-6 to MS and the involvement of U24. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Virology and Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3639 KB  
Article
GNAi2/gip2-Regulated Transcriptome and Its Therapeutic Significance in Ovarian Cancer
by Ji Hee Ha, Muralidharan Jayaraman, Mingda Yan, Padmaja Dhanasekaran, Ciro Isidoro, Yong Sang Song and Danny N. Dhanasekaran
Biomolecules 2021, 11(8), 1211; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081211 - 14 Aug 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5610
Abstract
Increased expression of GNAi2, which encodes the α-subunit of G-protein i2, has been correlated with the late-stage progression of ovarian cancer. GNAi2, also referred to as the proto-oncogene gip2, transduces signals from lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-activated LPA-receptors to oncogenic cellular responses [...] Read more.
Increased expression of GNAi2, which encodes the α-subunit of G-protein i2, has been correlated with the late-stage progression of ovarian cancer. GNAi2, also referred to as the proto-oncogene gip2, transduces signals from lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-activated LPA-receptors to oncogenic cellular responses in ovarian cancer cells. To identify the oncogenic program activated by gip2, we carried out micro-array-based transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses using the ovarian cancer cell-line SKOV3, in which the expression of GNAi2/gip2 was silenced by specific shRNA. A cut-off value of 5-fold change in gene expression (p < 0.05) indicated that a total of 264 genes were dependent upon gip2-expression with 136 genes coding for functional proteins. Functional annotation of the transcriptome indicated the hitherto unknown role of gip2 in stimulating the expression of oncogenic/growth-promoting genes such as KDR/VEGFR2, CCL20, and VIP. The array results were further validated in a panel of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma (HGSOC) cell lines that included Kuramochi, OVCAR3, and OVCAR8 cells. Gene set enrichment analyses using DAVID, STRING, and Cytoscape applications indicated the potential role of the gip2-stimulated transcriptomic network involved in the upregulation of cell proliferation, adhesion, migration, cellular metabolism, and therapy resistance. The results unravel a multi-modular network in which the hub and bottleneck nodes are defined by ACKR3/CXCR7, IL6, VEGFA, CYCS, COX5B, UQCRC1, UQCRFS1, and FYN. The identification of these genes as the critical nodes in GNAi2/gip2 orchestrated onco-transcriptome establishes their role in ovarian cancer pathophysiology. In addition, these results also point to these nodes as potential targets for novel therapeutic strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Section)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1920 KB  
Article
REDD1 Is Involved in Amyloid β-Induced Synaptic Dysfunction and Memory Impairment
by Jee Hyun Yi, Huiyoung Kwon, Eunbi Cho, Jieun Jeon, Jeongwon Lee, Young Choon Lee, Jong Hyun Cho, Mira Jun, Minho Moon, Jong Hoon Ryu, Ji-Su Kim, Ji Woong Choi, Se Jin Park, Seungheon Lee and Dong Hyun Kim
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(24), 9482; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249482 - 13 Dec 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3569
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by neurological dysfunction, including memory impairment, attributed to the accumulation of amyloid β (Aβ) in the brain. Although several studies reported possible mechanisms involved in Aβ pathology, much remains unknown. Previous findings suggested that a [...] Read more.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by neurological dysfunction, including memory impairment, attributed to the accumulation of amyloid β (Aβ) in the brain. Although several studies reported possible mechanisms involved in Aβ pathology, much remains unknown. Previous findings suggested that a protein regulated in development and DNA damage response 1 (REDD1), a stress-coping regulator, is an Aβ-responsive gene involved in Aβ cytotoxicity. However, we still do not know how Aβ increases the level of REDD1 and whether REDD1 mediates Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction. To elucidate this, we examined the effect of Aβ on REDD1-expression using acute hippocampal slices from mice, and the effect of REDD1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) on Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction. Lastly, we observed the effect of REDD1 shRNA on memory deficit in an AD-like mouse model. Through the experiments, we found that Aβ-incubated acute hippocampal slices showed increased REDD1 levels. Moreover, Aβ injection into the lateral ventricle increased REDD1 levels in the hippocampus. Anisomycin, but not actinomycin D, blocked Aβ-induced increase in REDD1 levels in the acute hippocampal slices, suggesting that Aβ may increase REDD1 translation rather than transcription. Aβ activated Fyn/ERK/S6 cascade, and inhibitors for Fyn/ERK/S6 or mGluR5 blocked Aβ-induced REDD1 upregulation. REDD1 inducer, a transcriptional activator, and Aβ blocked synaptic plasticity in the acute hippocampal slices. REDD1 inducer inhibited mTOR/Akt signaling. REDD1 shRNA blocked Aβ-induced synaptic deficits. REDD1 shRNA also blocked Aβ-induced memory deficits in passive-avoidance and object-recognition tests. Collectively, these results demonstrate that REDD1 participates in Aβ pathology and could be a target for AD therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop