Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Imhoff tanks

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1534 KB  
Article
Responses of Freshwater Invertebrates to Imhoff Tank Sewage Effluents: A Preliminary Study in Four Watercourses with Different Ecological Status (Abruzzo, Central Italy)
by Antonio Di Sabatino, Giovanni Damiani, Giada Ercolino, Floriana Rossi and Lino Ruggieri
Sustainability 2024, 16(6), 2452; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062452 - 15 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1413
Abstract
In many EU countries, a large proportion of domestic effluents is treated in small, decentralized wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) which often lack appropriate treatment technologies. The low efficiency of these systems and their incorrect maintenance often contribute to environmental deterioration, with a large [...] Read more.
In many EU countries, a large proportion of domestic effluents is treated in small, decentralized wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) which often lack appropriate treatment technologies. The low efficiency of these systems and their incorrect maintenance often contribute to environmental deterioration, with a large quantity of inadequately treated sewage dispersed in the soil or discharged into superficial watercourses. In the Abruzzo region (Central Italy), almost all rivers and streams receive wastewater from Imhoff tanks with only primary treatments. The ecological impacts of these effluents have rarely been investigated. This paper aimed to evaluate the response of freshwater invertebrates to Imhoff effluents in receiving watercourses with different ecological status. Our results showed that wastewater from Imhoff plants negatively affected the structure and composition of freshwater communities, with a reduction in the richness and abundance of more sensitive taxa and an increase in the most tolerant ones. These negative effects were more accentuated during low flow periods and in streams with moderate ecological status. To improve the ecological status of rivers and streams and to limit the diffusion of pathogens and micropollutants in freshwater, a more efficient (secondary treatments, possibly with nature-based solutions) and sustainable (water reuse or sewage sludge recycling) approach to wastewater treatment in decentralized WWTPs is urgently needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development of Hydrogeology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1070 KB  
Review
Carbon Footprint and Energy Recovery Potential of Primary Wastewater Treatment in Decentralized Areas: A Critical Review on Septic and Imhoff Tanks
by Riccardo Boiocchi, Matia Mainardis, Elena Cristina Rada, Marco Ragazzi and Silvana Carla Salvati
Energies 2023, 16(24), 7938; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16247938 - 6 Dec 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5003
Abstract
The present work is a critical review on the carbon footprint and energy recovery potential of septic and Imhoff tanks for primary wastewater treatment. From an online search of research papers, a lack of up-to-date research about gas emissions from Imhoff tanks emerged. [...] Read more.
The present work is a critical review on the carbon footprint and energy recovery potential of septic and Imhoff tanks for primary wastewater treatment. From an online search of research papers, a lack of up-to-date research about gas emissions from Imhoff tanks emerged. Additionally, available literature data should be extended to incorporate the effect of seasonal variations, which may be relevant due to the fact that both systems work under environmental conditions. The literature generally agrees on the positive effect of temperature increase on biogas and methane production from both septic and Imhoff tanks. Additionally, sludge withdrawal is an important operational feature for gas production in these reactors. More recently, the application of electrochemical technologies and the installation of photovoltaic modules have been studied to enhance the sustainability of these decentralized solutions; in addition, sludge pretreatment has been investigated to raise the obtainable methane yields due to limited sludge biodegradability. Further research is needed to assess the effective sustainability of biogas collection and valorization from existing septic and Imhoff tanks, considering the limited biogas generation and the implementation of these systems in decentralized wastewater treatment scenarios (rural or mountain areas). Contrary to the intensive research on greenhouse gas mitigation strategies applied to centralized systems, solutions specifically designed for gas emission mitigations from septic and Imhoff tanks have not attracted the same scientific interest up to now. More generally, given the widespread application of these two options and their potential significant contribution to the overall carbon footprint of wastewater treatment technologies, much more research must be performed in the future both on the quantification of gas production and on the applicable strategies to reduce their carbon footprint. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop