Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = JPEG XR

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3213 KB  
Article
An Autoencoder-Based Task-Oriented Semantic Communication System for M2M Communication
by Prabhath Samarathunga, Hossein Rezaei, Maheshi Lokumarambage, Thushan Sivalingam, Nandana Rajatheva and Anil Fernando
Algorithms 2024, 17(11), 492; https://doi.org/10.3390/a17110492 - 2 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1622
Abstract
Semantic communication (SC) is a communication paradigm that has gained significant attention, as it offers a potential solution to move beyond Shannon’s formulation in bandwidth-limited communication channels by delivering the semantic meaning of the message rather than its exact form. In this paper, [...] Read more.
Semantic communication (SC) is a communication paradigm that has gained significant attention, as it offers a potential solution to move beyond Shannon’s formulation in bandwidth-limited communication channels by delivering the semantic meaning of the message rather than its exact form. In this paper, we propose an autoencoder-based SC system for transmitting images between two machines over error-prone channels to support emerging applications such as VIoT, XR, M2M, and M2H communications. The proposed autoencoder architecture, with a semantically modeled encoder and decoder, transmits image data as a reduced-dimension vector (latent vector) through an error-prone channel. The decoder then reconstructs the image to determine its M2M implications. The autoencoder is trained for different noise levels under various channel conditions, and both image quality and classification accuracy are used to evaluate the system’s efficacy. A CNN image classifier measures accuracy, as no image quality metric is available for SC yet. The simulation results show that all proposed autoencoders maintain high image quality and classification accuracy at high SNRs, while the autoencoder trained with zero noise underperforms other trained autoencoders at moderate SNRs. The results further indicate that all other proposed autoencoders trained under different noise levels are highly robust against channel impairments. We compare the proposed system against a comparable JPEG transmission system, and results reveal that the proposed system outperforms the JPEG system in compression efficiency by up to 50% and in received image quality with an image coding gain of up to 17 dB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Algorithms for Image Understanding and Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 2683 KB  
Review
The Impact of State-of-the-Art Techniques for Lossless Still Image Compression
by Md. Atiqur Rahman, Mohamed Hamada and Jungpil Shin
Electronics 2021, 10(3), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030360 - 2 Feb 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 8459
Abstract
A great deal of information is produced daily, due to advances in telecommunication, and the issue of storing it on digital devices or transmitting it over the Internet is challenging. Data compression is essential in managing this information well. Therefore, research on data [...] Read more.
A great deal of information is produced daily, due to advances in telecommunication, and the issue of storing it on digital devices or transmitting it over the Internet is challenging. Data compression is essential in managing this information well. Therefore, research on data compression has become a topic of great interest to researchers, and the number of applications in this area is increasing. Over the last few decades, international organisations have developed many strategies for data compression, and there is no specific algorithm that works well on all types of data. The compression ratio, as well as encoding and decoding times, are mainly used to evaluate an algorithm for lossless image compression. However, although the compression ratio is more significant for some applications, others may require higher encoding or decoding speeds or both; alternatively, all three parameters may be equally important. The main aim of this article is to analyse the most advanced lossless image compression algorithms from each point of view, and evaluate the strength of each algorithm for each kind of image. We develop a technique regarding how to evaluate an image compression algorithm that is based on more than one parameter. The findings that are presented in this paper may be helpful to new researchers and to users in this area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Multimedia Signal Processing and Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 4507 KB  
Article
Reduction of Artefacts in JPEG-XR Compressed Images
by Kai-Lung Hua, Ho Thi Trang, Kathiravan Srinivasan, Yung-Yao Chen, Chun-Hao Chen, Vishal Sharma and Albert Y. Zomaya
Sensors 2019, 19(5), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051214 - 9 Mar 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4665
Abstract
The JPEG-XR encoding process utilizes two types of transform operations: Photo Overlap Transform (POT) and Photo Core Transform (PCT). Using the Device Porting Kit (DPK) provided by Microsoft, we performed encoding and decoding processes on JPEG XR images. It was discovered that when [...] Read more.
The JPEG-XR encoding process utilizes two types of transform operations: Photo Overlap Transform (POT) and Photo Core Transform (PCT). Using the Device Porting Kit (DPK) provided by Microsoft, we performed encoding and decoding processes on JPEG XR images. It was discovered that when the quantization parameter is >1-lossy compression conditions, the resulting image displays chequerboard block artefacts, border artefacts and corner artefacts. These artefacts are due to the nonlinearity of transforms used by JPEG-XR. Typically, it is not so visible; however, it can cause problems while copying and scanning applications, as it shows nonlinear transforms when the source and the target of the image have different configurations. Hence, it is important for document image processing pipelines to take such artefacts into account. Additionally, these artefacts are most problematic for high-quality settings and appear more visible at high compression ratios. In this paper, we analyse the cause of the above artefacts. It was found that the main problem lies in the step of POT and quantization. To solve this problem, the use of a “uniform matrix” is proposed. After POT (encoding) and before inverse POT (decoding), an extra step is added to multiply this uniform matrix. Results suggest that it is an easy and effective way to decrease chequerboard, border and corner artefacts, thereby improving the image quality of lossy encoding JPEG XR than the original DPK program with no increased calculation complexity or file size. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from INNOV 2018)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 4339 KB  
Review
The Current Role of Image Compression Standards in Medical Imaging
by Feng Liu, Miguel Hernandez-Cabronero, Victor Sanchez, Michael W. Marcellin and Ali Bilgin
Information 2017, 8(4), 131; https://doi.org/10.3390/info8040131 - 19 Oct 2017
Cited by 100 | Viewed by 14465
Abstract
With the increasing utilization of medical imaging in clinical practice and the growing dimensions of data volumes generated by various medical imaging modalities, the distribution, storage, and management of digital medical image data sets requires data compression. Over the past few decades, several [...] Read more.
With the increasing utilization of medical imaging in clinical practice and the growing dimensions of data volumes generated by various medical imaging modalities, the distribution, storage, and management of digital medical image data sets requires data compression. Over the past few decades, several image compression standards have been proposed by international standardization organizations. This paper discusses the current status of these image compression standards in medical imaging applications together with some of the legal and regulatory issues surrounding the use of compression in medical settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Review)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop