Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Jobar

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
7 pages, 261 KB  
Brief Report
Additional Value of Mini-Cog© in Urogeriatric Patients Concurrently Screened by G8 Scores
by Jobar Bouzan, Peter Willschrei and Marcus Horstmann
Medicines 2023, 10(10), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines10100056 - 8 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1944
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment is poorly addressed in G8 screening. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the additional value of Mini-Cog© in urogeriatric patients concurrently screened by G8 scores. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive urogeriatric patients aged 75 and above were evaluated. All [...] Read more.
Background: Cognitive impairment is poorly addressed in G8 screening. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the additional value of Mini-Cog© in urogeriatric patients concurrently screened by G8 scores. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive urogeriatric patients aged 75 and above were evaluated. All patients underwent G8 and Mini-Cog© screening. Patients with a G8 score above 14 were considered geriatric “healthy or fit”. A Mini-Cog© from four to five points was considered inconspicuous in screening for cognitive impairment. The additional information of a Mini-Cog© screening during G8 screening was evaluated by looking at G8 “fit and healthy” patients who had conspicuous Mini-Cog© tests and vice versa. Additionally, the results of the neuropsychological subitem “E” of the G8 score were compared with the results of the Mini-Cog© screening. Results: The mean age of the patients was 83 y (min. 75–max. 102). Sixty-one of the patients were males, and 13 were females. Twenty-nine of the patients had a normal G8 score and were considered “healthy or fit”, and 45 were not. Forty-three of the patients had an inconspicuous Mini-Cog©, and 31 had a conspicuous Mini-Cog© of less than four points. The majority of G8 “healthy or fit” patients (n = 24/29) had an inconspicuous Mini-Cog© test. However, of them, five patients had a Mini-Cog© of less than four points, which is suspicious for cognitive disorders. Furthermore, of the 43 patients with a normal G8 subscore in item “E” of two points, 6 patients had a conspicuous Mini-Cog© of less than four points. Conclusions: As shown by the present study, the Mini-Cog© might extend the G8 screening with regard to the detection of cognitive functional impairments that are not detected by the G8 screening alone. It can be easily added to G8 screening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology and Urology)
8 pages, 489 KB  
Article
Comparison of G8 and ISAR Screening Results in Geriatric Urology
by Jobar Bouzan, Boris Stoilkov, Spyridon Nellas and Marcus Horstmann
Medicines 2021, 8(8), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines8080040 - 22 Jul 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5922
Abstract
Background: The G8 and ISAR scores are two different screening tools for geriatric risk factors and frailty. The aim of this study was to compare the G8 and ISAR screening results in a cohort of urogeriatric patients to help clinicians to better understand [...] Read more.
Background: The G8 and ISAR scores are two different screening tools for geriatric risk factors and frailty. The aim of this study was to compare the G8 and ISAR screening results in a cohort of urogeriatric patients to help clinicians to better understand and choose between the two tests. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 100 patients at the age of 75 and above who were treated for different urological conditions. All routinely and prospectively underwent G8 and ISAR screening tests. A G8 score ≤ 14 and an ISAR score > 2 were considered positive. The results for the two tests were compared and correlated to clinical data. Results: The mean age of the patients was 83 y (min. 75–max. 101); 78 of the patients were male, while 22 were female; 58 of the patients were G8-positive, while 42 were G8-negative; and 24 were ISAR-positive, while 76 ISAR were negative. All the ISAR-positive patients were also G8-positive. There was a significant negative correlation between the G8 and ISAR scores (r = −0.77, p < 0.001). Both tests correlated significantly with the Charlson comorbidity index, length of stay, number of coded diagnosis, and Braden score (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both tests are significantly correlated with each other and to clinical data related to geriatric frailty. However, the G8 score has a much higher rate of positive tests, which limits its use in daily routine, and the ISAR score is therefore preferable. For “fit” geriatric patients, however, a negative G8 score can be of great use as a confirmatory test for further decision making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue PROTAC—From Bench to Bed)
Show Figures

Figure A1

23 pages, 5895 KB  
Article
Between Heaven and Earth: Places of Worship in Egypt and Syria through the Mirror of Visual Evidence
by Rachel Sarfati
Arts 2020, 9(3), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts9030090 - 16 Aug 2020
Viewed by 4440
Abstract
In the villages Dammūh, near Fustֿׅatׅ, and Jobar, near Damascus, there were places of worship dedicated to Moses and Elijah which were part of central pilgrimage sites. This article will propose a depiction of the architecture and interiors of these places based on [...] Read more.
In the villages Dammūh, near Fustֿׅatׅ, and Jobar, near Damascus, there were places of worship dedicated to Moses and Elijah which were part of central pilgrimage sites. This article will propose a depiction of the architecture and interiors of these places based on visual and literary sources from the Middle Ages. In addition to the realistic aspect, this article will suggest that the unique design of the reviewed illustrations expressed the prevalent belief that when the Temple was destroyed, the Shekhinah was exiled to the holy sites in Dammūh and Jobar. According to a common tradition, these places are located between heaven and earth, and he who prays in them feels like he is in the Garden of Eden. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synagogue Art and Architecture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop