Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Mediterranean peridotites

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
33 pages, 3852 KB  
Review
Chromite Composition and Platinum-Group Elements Distribution in Tethyan Chromitites of the Mediterranean Basin: An Overview
by Federica Zaccarini, Maria Economou-Eliopoulos, Basilios Tsikouras and Giorgio Garuti
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080744 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2403
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive literature review of the distribution, the platinum- group elements (PGE) composition, and mineral chemistry of chromitites associated with Mesozoic Tethyan ophiolites in the Mediterranean Basin. These suites outcrop in the northern Italian Apennines, the Balkans, Turkey, and Cyprus. [...] Read more.
This study provides a comprehensive literature review of the distribution, the platinum- group elements (PGE) composition, and mineral chemistry of chromitites associated with Mesozoic Tethyan ophiolites in the Mediterranean Basin. These suites outcrop in the northern Italian Apennines, the Balkans, Turkey, and Cyprus. Most chromitites occur in depleted mantle tectonites, with fewer found in the mantle-transition zone (MTZ) and supra-Moho cumulates. Based on their Cr# = (Cr/(Cr + Al)) values, chromitites are primarily classified as high-Cr, with a subordinate presence of high-Al chromitites. Occasionally, high-Al and high-Cr chromitites co-exist within the same ophiolite complex. High-Cr chromitites are formed in supra-subduction zone (SSZ) environments, where depleted mantle interacts with high-Mg boninitic melts. Conversely, high-Al chromitites are typically associated with extensional tectonic regimes and more fertile peridotites. The co-existence of high-Al and high-Cr chromitites within the same ophiolite is attributed to tectonic movements and separate magma intrusions from variably depleted mantle sources, such as mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) and back-arc basin basalts. These chromitites formed in different geodynamic settings during the transition of the oceanic lithosphere from a mid-ocean ridge (MOR) to a supra-subduction zone (SSZ) regime or, alternatively, within an SSZ during the differentiation of a single boninitic magma batch. Distinct bimodal distribution and vertical zoning were observed: high-Cr chromitites formed in the deep mantle, while Al-rich counterparts formed at shallower depths near the MTZ. Only a few of the aforementioned chromitites, particularly the high-Cr ones, are enriched in the refractory IPGE (iridium-group PGE: Os, Ir, Ru) relative to PPGE (palladium-group PGE: Rh, Pt, Pd), with an average PPGE/IPGE ratio of 0.66, resulting in well-defined negative slopes in PGE patterns. The IPGE enrichment is attributed to their compatible geochemical behavior during significant degrees of partial melting (up to 30%) of the host mantle. It is suggested that the boninitic melt, which crystallized the high-Cr chromitites, was enriched in IPGE during melt-rock reactions with the mantle source, thus enriching the chromitites in IPGE as well. High-Al chromitites generally exhibit high PPGE/IPGE ratios, up to 3.14, and strongly fractionated chondrite-normalized PGE patterns with positive slopes and significant enrichments in Pt and Pd. The PPGE enrichment in high-Al chromitites is attributed to the lower degree of partial melting of their mantle source and crystallization from a MOR-type melt, which contains fewer IPGE than the boninitic melt above. High-Al chromitites forming at higher stratigraphic levels in the host ophiolite likely derive from progressively evolving parental magma. Thus, the PPGE enrichment in high-Al chromitites is attributed to crystal fractionation processes that consumed part of the IPGE during the early precipitation of co-existing high-Cr chromitites in the deep mantle. Only a few high-Al chromitites show PPGE enrichment due to local sulfur saturation and the potential formation of an immiscible sulfide liquid, which could concentrate the remaining PPGE in the ore-forming system. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 22530 KB  
Article
Metal Mobility in Embryonic-to-Proto-Ni-Laterite Profiles from Non-Tropical Climates
by José María González-Jiménez, Cristina Villanova-de-Benavent, Lola Yesares, Claudio Marchesi, David Cartwright, Joaquín A. Proenza, Luis Monasterio-Guillot and Fernando Gervilla
Minerals 2023, 13(7), 844; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070844 - 22 Jun 2023
Viewed by 2564
Abstract
We evaluated the mobility of a wide suite of economic metals (Ni, Co, REE, Sc, PGE) in Ni-laterites with different maturities, developed in the unconventional humid/hyper-humid Mediterranean climate. An embryonic Ni-laterite was identified at Los Reales in southern Spain, where a saprolite profile [...] Read more.
We evaluated the mobility of a wide suite of economic metals (Ni, Co, REE, Sc, PGE) in Ni-laterites with different maturities, developed in the unconventional humid/hyper-humid Mediterranean climate. An embryonic Ni-laterite was identified at Los Reales in southern Spain, where a saprolite profile of ~1.5 m thick was formed at the expense of peridotites of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle. In contrast, a more mature laterite was reported from Camán in south-central Chile, where the thicker (~7 m) weathering profile contains well-developed lower and upper oxide horizons. This comparative study reveals that both embryonic and mature laterites can form outside the typical (sub)-tropical climate conditions expected for lateritic soils, while demonstrating a similar chemical evolution in terms of major (MgO, Fe2O3, and Al2O3), minor (Ni, Mn, Co, Ti, Cr), and trace (REE, Y, Sc, PGE, Au) element concentrations. We show that, even in the earliest stages of laterization, the metal remobilization from primary minerals can already result in uneconomic concentration values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Ni-Co Laterite Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6962 KB  
Article
Elemental Concentration in Serpentinitic Soils over Ultramafic Bedrock in Sierra Bermeja (Southern Spain)
by Ana Romero-Freire, José Antonio Olmedo-Cobo and José Gómez-Zotano
Minerals 2018, 8(10), 447; https://doi.org/10.3390/min8100447 - 12 Oct 2018
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4028
Abstract
Although the presence of potentially toxic metals in soils is normally associated with human soil pollution, these elements also appear naturally in environments in which the lithological base contains ultramafic rocks such as peridotites. Serpentinitic soils tend to develop on substrates of this [...] Read more.
Although the presence of potentially toxic metals in soils is normally associated with human soil pollution, these elements also appear naturally in environments in which the lithological base contains ultramafic rocks such as peridotites. Serpentinitic soils tend to develop on substrates of this kind, often containing metals with few or no known biological functions, which in some cases are toxic for most plants. This study assessed the level of potentially toxic metals and other elements in an endorheic basin discovered in Sierra Bermeja (Southern Spain), one of the largest peridotite outcrops on Earth. In this location—of particular interest given that basins of this kind are very rare on peridotites—six geomorphoedaphic sub-units on three different substrates were identified. The distribution of microelements in these sub-units was analyzed, and stratified random sampling was performed to identify the major ions with essential functions for living organisms and the potentially toxic metals. The lowest values for macronutrients appeared in the soils formed on ultramafic materials. When analyzing the load of potentially toxic metals, no significant differences were detected between the soils formed on serpentinite and peridotite substrates, although different values were obtained in the soils formed over acidic rocks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultramafic Complexes and Related Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop