Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = QuantiFERON Monitor Test

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1418 KB  
Article
QuantiFERON® Monitor Test as a Potential Tool for Stratifying Patients by Infection Risk and Tailoring Follow-Up Care in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
by Paolo Solidoro, Antonio Curtoni, Filippo Patrucco, Eleonora Russo, Francesca Sidoti, Giorgia Piccinini, Alessandro Bondi, Paolo Valesella, Mattia Genco, Massimo Boffini, Rocco Francesco Rinaldo and Cristina Costa
Microorganisms 2025, 13(2), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13020316 - 1 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1016
Abstract
Background: Lung transplantation is a life-saving option for patients with end-stage respiratory diseases, but risk of infections remains critical for ensuring long-term organ function. This study aimed to assess immune recovery in lung transplant recipients by measuring IFN-γ levels using the QuantiFERON Monitor [...] Read more.
Background: Lung transplantation is a life-saving option for patients with end-stage respiratory diseases, but risk of infections remains critical for ensuring long-term organ function. This study aimed to assess immune recovery in lung transplant recipients by measuring IFN-γ levels using the QuantiFERON Monitor Test (QFM). Results were correlated with episodes of infection and organ rejection to explore the assay’s predictive potential. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 15 lung transplant recipients at the Lung Transplant Centre of Turin (Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Italy) between December 2019 and January 2023. Patients were divided into a High Infection (HI) group (with >3 infections) and Low Infection (LI) group (with ≤3 infections). QFM assays were performed after 18 months post-transplant. Results: HI patients had lower QFM levels compared to LI (68.84 ± 21.98 vs. 380.54 ± 104.64 UI/mL, p = 0.033). A QFM value <89.5 UI/mL was associated with increased infection risk (p < 0.05). Patients with lower QFM levels also exhibited higher rates of MRSA bacteremia during hospitalization (50% HI vs. 0% LI, p = 0.04). No differences were observed in acute or chronic rejection rates, but LI patients showed more frequent alveolar neutrophilia at the fourth month post-transplant (0% HI vs. 55.5% LI, p = 0.04). Conclusion: lower QFM values were associated with higher infection risk, highlighting the assay’s potential for immune monitoring. In this study, a QFM value of 89.5 UI/mL showed good predictive accuracy for infections beyond 18 months. Further studies are needed to refine QFM’s role in post-transplant care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pneumonia: New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3160 KB  
Case Report
A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Eales Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
by Maria Filoftea Mercuț, Oana Maria Ică, Cornelia Andreea Tănasie, Răzvan Mercuț, Carmen Luminița Mocanu, Andreea Mihaela Nicolcescu and Ciprian Danielescu
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(3), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030235 - 22 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2747
Abstract
Eales disease manifests as an obliterative periphlebitis affecting the retina; it originates from the periphery and progresses posteriorly. It is characterized by retinal vessel wall inflammation, ischemia, and retinal neovascularization. In this report, we present the case of a 34-year-old male who attended [...] Read more.
Eales disease manifests as an obliterative periphlebitis affecting the retina; it originates from the periphery and progresses posteriorly. It is characterized by retinal vessel wall inflammation, ischemia, and retinal neovascularization. In this report, we present the case of a 34-year-old male who attended our clinic with a sudden blurring of vision in his right eye. A diagnosis of bilateral retinal vasculitis with vitreal hemorrhage was ascertained in his RE. A dilated ocular fundus examination revealed perivenous sheathing of the peripheral vessels in both eyes. Fluorescein angiography indicated dye staining, vessel obliteration, capillary drop-out, areas of non-perfusion and the formation of new vessels. Laboratory tests revealed positive results for Borrelia; a PPD skin test and QuantiFERON TB assay were also positive. The patient underwent bilateral retinal laser pan-photocoagulation, followed by systemic treatment with oral steroids, cephazoline, isoniazid, azathioprine, and entecavir. The steroid dose was progressively reduced over 10 months; the treatment with azathioprine continues, as we are monitoring the patient over the long term. After 3 months, the vasculitis had regressed without any vitreal hemorrhage recurrence. Vision acuity improved from 0.4 to 1 in the patient’s right eye. A multidisciplinary approach, which included collaborative management with gastroenterology, infectious disease, pulmonology, and rheumatology specialists, was essential for the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term follow up of the patient. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Medicine, Cell, and Organism Physiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2033 KB  
Article
Quantiferon Monitor Testing Sheds Light on Immune System Disparities between Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Healthy Individuals
by Ilona Součková, Ondřej Souček, Jan Krejsek, Oldřich Vyšata, David Matyáš, Marek Peterka, Michal Novotný, Pavel Kunc and Zbyšek Pavelek
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2179; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042179 - 11 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2183
Abstract
The aim of this study was to conduct QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) testing in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), which is used to monitor the state of the immune system through the non-specific stimulation of leukocytes followed by determining the level of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to conduct QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) testing in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), which is used to monitor the state of the immune system through the non-specific stimulation of leukocytes followed by determining the level of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) released from activated cells. Additionally, we tested the level of selected cytokines (IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-15, IL-33, VEGF) from stimulated blood samples to further understand the immune response. This study builds upon a previously published study, utilizing activated serum samples that were initially used for IFN-γ determination. However, our current focus shifts from IFN-γ to exploring other cytokines that could provide further insights into the immune response. A screening was conducted using Luminex technology, which yielded promising results. These results were then further elaborated upon using ELISA to provide a more detailed understanding of the cytokine profiles involved. This study, conducted from August 2019 to June 2023, included 280 participants: 98 RRMS patients treated with fingolimod (fMS), 96 untreated patients with progressive MS (pMS), and 86 healthy controls (HC). Our results include Violin plots showing elevated IL-1α in pMS and fMS. Statistical analysis indicated significant differences in the interleukin levels between groups, with IL-1ra and age as key predictors in differentiating HC from pMS and IL-1ra, IL-1α, age, and EDSS in distinguishing pMS from fMS. These findings suggest cytokines’ potential as biomarkers in MS progression and treatment response. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanism in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1450 KB  
Article
Humoral and Cellular Immunogenicity of Six Different Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in Adults: A Comparative Study in Tunisia (North Africa)
by Melika Ben Ahmed, Hedia Bellali, Mariem Gdoura, Imen Zamali, Ouafa Kallala, Ahlem Ben Hmid, Walid Hamdi, Hela Ayari, Hajer Fares, Karim Mechri, Soumaya Marzouki, Henda Triki, Nissaf Ben Alaya, Mohamed Kouni Chahed, Anis Klouz, Sonia Sebai Ben Amor, Chiheb Ben Rayana, Myriam Razgallah Khrouf, Chokri Hamouda, Noomene Elkadri, Riadh Daghfous and Abdelhalim Trabelsiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2022, 10(8), 1189; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081189 - 27 Jul 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3426
Abstract
Background: The mass vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2 was started in Tunisia on 13 March 2021 by using progressively seven different vaccines approved for emergency use. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the humoral and cellular immunity in subjects aged 40 years and over who [...] Read more.
Background: The mass vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2 was started in Tunisia on 13 March 2021 by using progressively seven different vaccines approved for emergency use. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the humoral and cellular immunity in subjects aged 40 years and over who received one of the following two-dose regimen vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, namely mRNA-1273 or Spikevax (Moderna), BNT162B2 or Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech), Gam-COVID-Vac or Sputnik V (Gamaleya Research Institute), ChAdOx1-S or Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), BIBP (Sinopharm), and Coronavac (Sinovac). Material and methods: For each type of vaccine, a sample of subjects aged 40 and over was randomly selected from the national platform for monitoring COVID-19 vaccination and contacted to participate to this study. All consenting participants were sampled for peripheral blood at 3–7 weeks after the second vaccine dose to perform anti-S and anti-N serology by the Elecsys® (Lenexa, KS, USA) anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays (Roche® Basel, Switzerland). The CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were evaluated by the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 (Qiagen® Basel, Switzerland) for a randomly selected sub-group. Results: A total of 501 people consented to the study and, of them, 133 were included for the cellular response investigations. Both humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens differed significantly between all tested groups. RNA vaccines induced the highest levels of humoral and cellular anti-S responses followed by adenovirus vaccines and then by inactivated vaccines. Vaccines from the same platform induced similar levels of specific anti-S immune responses except in the case of the Sputnik V and the AstraZeneca vaccine, which exhibited contrasting effects on humoral and cellular responses. When analyses were performed in subjects with negative anti-N antibodies, results were similar to those obtained within the total cohort, except for the Moderna vaccine, which gave a better cellular immune response than the Pfizer vaccine and RNA vaccines, which induced similar cellular immune responses to those of adenovirus vaccines. Conclusion: Collectively, our data confirmed the superiority of the RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, in particular that of Moderna, for both humoral and cellular immunogenicity. Our results comparing between different vaccine platforms in a similar population are of great importance since they may help decision makers to adopt the best strategy for further national vaccination programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 867 KB  
Case Report
Spondylodiscitis in Paediatric Patients: The Importance of Early Diagnosis and Prolonged Therapy
by Sonia Bianchini, Andrea Esposito, Nicola Principi and Susanna Esposito
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(6), 1195; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061195 - 7 Jun 2018
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5709
Abstract
Background: Spondylodiscitis (SD), the concurrent infection of a vertebral disc and the adjacent vertebral bodies, is a very severe disease that can lead to death or cause spinal deformities, segmental instabilities, and chronic pain, which significantly reduces the quality of life for affected [...] Read more.
Background: Spondylodiscitis (SD), the concurrent infection of a vertebral disc and the adjacent vertebral bodies, is a very severe disease that can lead to death or cause spinal deformities, segmental instabilities, and chronic pain, which significantly reduces the quality of life for affected patients. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential in order to reduce the risk of negative outcomes. The two cases of SD that are described in this paper might be useful for informing paediatric approaches to children with SD. Case presentation: The cases that are reported here are about two children of approximately 2 and 3 years of age, in whom SD involving the L4–L5 and L3–L4 interspaces, had a subacute or chronic course. The clinical manifestations were mild, fever was absent, and the lumbar pain lasted for a long time and was the predominant symptom. Moreover, laboratory tests were in the normal range or only slightly abnormal, as were the standard radiographs of the lumbar spine. In both of the cases, SD confirmation was obtained through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI was also used to evaluate the response to therapy. In both of our patients, tuberculosis was excluded based on tuberculin skin testing and the Quantiferon TBgold tests being negative. This finding led to the prescription of a broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, including a drug that was potentially effective against Staphylococcus aureus (Sa). The strict monitoring of the spinal damage with MRI avoided the need for aspirations or biopsies; invasive procedures that are ethically acceptable in pediatric age only in a few selected cases, when the empirical antibiotic is associated with a worsening of spinal damage; or the vertebral osteomyelitis lesion mimics a tumoral lesion. Conclusions: Although rare, SD represents an important disease in children. In toddlers and preschool children, it can have a subacute or chronic course, in which only back pain, irritability, and walking difficulties are the signs and symptoms of the disease. MRI remains the best method for confirming the diagnosis and for evaluating therapy efficacy. Antibiotics are the drugs of choice. Although the duration has not been established, antibiotics should be administered for several weeks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 961 KB  
Article
Use of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Test in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Treatment Efficacy in Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis
by Ping-Chin Chang, Pin-Hui Wang and Kow-Tong Chen
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(3), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030236 - 27 Feb 2017
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 6099
Abstract
The value of QuantiFERON in the diagnosis of tuberculosis disease and in the monitoring of the response to anti-tuberculosis treatment is unclear. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test in the diagnosis of [...] Read more.
The value of QuantiFERON in the diagnosis of tuberculosis disease and in the monitoring of the response to anti-tuberculosis treatment is unclear. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis and in the monitoring of the response to anti-tuberculosis treatment in patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Between January 2013 and December 2015, 133 cases with active PTB and 133 controls with no mycobacterial infection, matched by age (within 3 years) and by the week that they visited Tainan Chest Hospital, were enrolled in the study. Serial testing by QFT-GIT at baseline and after 2 and 6 months of treatment was performed. At these time points, a comparison of the performance of QFT-GIT with that of sputum culture status among study subjects was conducted. Compared to baseline, 116 (87.2%) cases showed a decreased response, whereas 17 (12.8%) showed persistent or stronger interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) responses at 2 months. PTB patients IFN-γ responses declined significantly from baseline to 2 months (median, 6.32 vs. 4.12; p < 0.005). The sensitivity values of the QFT-GIT test for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis at cut-off points of 0.35 IU/mL, 0.20 IU/mL, and 0.10 IU/mL were 74.4%, 78.2%, and 80.5%, respectively. The specificity values at cut-off points of 0.35 IU/mL, 0.20 IU/mL, and 0.10 IU/mL were 66.2%, 63.9%, and 57.1%, respectively. Our results support the QFT-GIT assay as a potential tool for diagnosing tuberculosis and for monitoring the efficacy of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Global Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop