Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = SRUP

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
3 pages, 157 KB  
Correction
Correction: Peponi, A.; Morgado, P. Transition to Smart and Regenerative Urban Places (SRUP): Contributions to a New Conceptual Framework. Land 2021, 10, 2
by Angeliki Peponi and Paulo Morgado
Land 2022, 11(3), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030318 - 22 Feb 2022
Viewed by 1109
Abstract
Error in Figure/Table Caption [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Contexts and Urban-Rural Interactions)
15 pages, 3424 KB  
Article
An Assessment of the Performance of the Secure Remote Update Protocol in Simulated Real-World Conditions
by Andrew John Poulter and Simon J. Cox
IoT 2021, 2(4), 549-563; https://doi.org/10.3390/iot2040028 - 23 Sep 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3121
Abstract
This paper assesses the relative performance of the MQTT protocol in comparison to the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP) in a number of simulated real-world conditions, and describes an experiment that has been conducted to measure the processing delay associated with the use [...] Read more.
This paper assesses the relative performance of the MQTT protocol in comparison to the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP) in a number of simulated real-world conditions, and describes an experiment that has been conducted to measure the processing delay associated with the use of the more secure protocol. Experimental measurements for power consumption of the devices and the size of comparable TCP packets were also made. Analysis shows that the use of the SRUP protocol added an additional processing delay of between 42.92 ms and 51.60 ms—depending on the specific hardware in use. There was also shown to be a 55.47% increase in power consumption when running the secure SRUP protocol, compared with an MQTT implementation. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 1246 KB  
Article
Transition to Smart and Regenerative Urban Places (SRUP): Contributions to a New Conceptual Framework
by Angeliki Peponi and Paulo Morgado
Land 2021, 10(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/land10010002 - 22 Dec 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5604 | Correction
Abstract
Modern urbanism is called to face current challenges ranging from intensive demographic growth, economic and social stagnation to resources salvation and climate changes. Under the broader scope of sustainability, we argue that the transition to a holistic perspective of smart and regenerative planning [...] Read more.
Modern urbanism is called to face current challenges ranging from intensive demographic growth, economic and social stagnation to resources salvation and climate changes. Under the broader scope of sustainability, we argue that the transition to a holistic perspective of smart and regenerative planning and design is the way to face and yet to prevent these urban challenges. In doing so, we adopt systematic thinking to study the complexity of urban metabolisms at an urban place scale, emphasizing the ongoing coevolution of social-cultural-technological and ecological processes. Focusing on urban places, we give a city or region the sense of a place of stability, security, cultural and social interactions, and a sense of uniqueness. We plan and design innovative urban places that improve the environment and the quality of urban life, able to adapt and mitigate climate changes and natural hazards, leverage community spirit, and power a green-based economy. Designing the conceptual framework of smart and regenerative urban places we contribute to the field of modern urban studies helping practitioners, policymakers, and decision-makers to vision and adopt more environmental-friendly policies and actions using a user-centered approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urban Contexts and Urban-Rural Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 6047 KB  
Article
Enabling the Secure Use of Dynamic Identity for the Internet of Things—Using the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP)
by Andrew John Poulter, Steven J. Ossont and Simon J. Cox
Future Internet 2020, 12(8), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12080138 - 18 Aug 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3762
Abstract
This paper examines dynamic identity, as it pertains to the Internet of Things (IoT), and explores the practical implementation of a mitigation technique for some of the key weaknesses of a conventional dynamic identity model. This paper explores human-centric and machine-based observer approaches [...] Read more.
This paper examines dynamic identity, as it pertains to the Internet of Things (IoT), and explores the practical implementation of a mitigation technique for some of the key weaknesses of a conventional dynamic identity model. This paper explores human-centric and machine-based observer approaches for confirming device identity, permitting automated identity confirmation for deployed systems. It also assesses the advantages of dynamic identity in the context of identity revocation permitting secure change of ownership for IoT devices. The paper explores use-cases for human and machine-based observation for authentication of device identity when devices join a Command and Control(C2) network, and considers the relative merits for these two approaches for different types of system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers for Future Internet—Internet of Things Section)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 450 KB  
Article
Extensions and Enhancements to “the Secure Remote Update Protocol”
by Andrew John Poulter, Steven J. Johnson and Simon J. Cox
Future Internet 2017, 9(4), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9040059 - 30 Sep 2017
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6107
Abstract
This paper builds on previous work introducing the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP), a secure communications protocol for Command and Control applications in the Internet of Things, built on top of MQTT. This paper builds on the original protocol and introduces a number [...] Read more.
This paper builds on previous work introducing the Secure Remote Update Protocol (SRUP), a secure communications protocol for Command and Control applications in the Internet of Things, built on top of MQTT. This paper builds on the original protocol and introduces a number of additional message types: adding additional capabilities to the protocol. We also discuss the difficulty of proving that a physical device has an identity corresponding to a logical device on the network and propose a mechanism to overcome this within the protocol. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IoT Security and Privacy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop