Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Strix uralensis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 961 KB  
Review
The Ural Owl as a Keystone Species in Interspecific Interactions Among Avian Predators—A Review
by Łukasz Kajtoch
Diversity 2025, 17(2), 109; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17020109 - 1 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1725
Abstract
Ural owls are one of the largest owls in Europe, exhibiting known aggressive behaviour toward other raptors. They are known to interact with nearly all sympatric owls and many diurnal raptors. To summarise these interactions, a literature search was undertaken in the Web [...] Read more.
Ural owls are one of the largest owls in Europe, exhibiting known aggressive behaviour toward other raptors. They are known to interact with nearly all sympatric owls and many diurnal raptors. To summarise these interactions, a literature search was undertaken in the Web of Sciences and Scopus databases using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology as well principal books on owl biology. The search revealed 22 relevant publications that (along with the book data) described the Ural owl’s relations with seven owls and six diurnal raptor species. The Ural owl is subordinate only to the largest predators like golden eagles and eagles, although only its chicks are known to be killed. Contrary to that, the Ural owls shape the distribution of numerous other species, mostly by strong competition (e.g., forcing tawny owls to breed in suboptimal habitats) or by predation (killing smaller owls and diurnal raptors). Their occurrence could be also protective for some species like boreal owls thanks to the removal of intermediate predators. The relations of Ural owls with goshawks are interesting, which seem to live in some balance—temporal avoidance of activity with frequent co-occurrence. Thanks to their association with old-growth forests and their impact on other predators in their territories, Ural owls act as keystone species in mountainous and boreal forests in Europe. Considering this ecosystem service, Ural owls should be effectively protected e.g., by designing forest-management-free zones around their nesting sites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Birds in Temperate and Tropical Forests—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2996 KB  
Article
Habitat Impacts on the Golden Eagle’s Foraging Ecology and Nest Site Selection in Poland
by Marian Stój, Robert Kruszyk, Dorota Zawadzka and Grzegorz Zawadzki
Diversity 2024, 16(2), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020123 - 14 Feb 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4027
Abstract
The Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos (hereafter GE) is one of Europe’s largest avian top predators. The present study recognizes the habitat characteristics and food composition of the GE in Poland. The research was carried out in the Polish part of the Carpathian Mountains. [...] Read more.
The Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos (hereafter GE) is one of Europe’s largest avian top predators. The present study recognizes the habitat characteristics and food composition of the GE in Poland. The research was carried out in the Polish part of the Carpathian Mountains. The GEs built nests mainly on old coniferous trees and strongly preferred the Silver Fir Abies alba. On average, within a 5 km buffer around the nest, forests covered about 2/3 of the area, while open land with villages was at 31% and water was about 1%. Birds preferred areas with less forest cover than in the random points, but the nests were significantly further from the countryside than the distance measured for the drawn points distributed in the GEs’ range in Poland. Their diet during the breeding season was assessed by analyzing pellets and food remains. The proportion of birds was 55.7%, mammals was 43.4%, and reptiles was 0.9%. The ten most common prey species included the Domestic Pigeon Columba livia, the Ural Owl Strix uralensis, the Tawny Owl Strix aluco, the Buzzard Buteo buteo, the Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus, the Martens Martes sp., and the Red Fox Vulpes vulpes, which composed 70% of food items. Our results showed that the GE is a top predator, as evidenced by the high share of other predators—both mammal and bird species—in its diet, which constituted about 34% of identified preys. The diet of the studied GE population showed geographical variation, suggesting local adaptations to available prey species. The share of Roe Deer increased from west to east, indicating a higher availability in the less urbanized eastern part of the country. An analysis of general food categories showed that, as latitude increased, the share of captured birds among prey of the GEs declined, while the percentage of forest prey increased. Pigeons were prey of the GEs mainly in the western part of their range. The GEs often captured species with nocturnal activity—owls and martens, which were identified in most of the GEs’ territories. The proportion of mammals in the diet of the GE increased with an increase in the proportion of open areas, while the abundance of birds of prey and owls in the diet correlated with a higher proportion of forests. The greatest threat to Poland’s GE population is the reduction in semi-open areas with low human activity and low human population densities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Diversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 4462 KB  
Article
Numerical Response of Owls to the Dampening of Small Mammal Population Cycles in Latvia
by Andris Avotins, Andris Avotins, Viesturs Ķerus and Ainars Aunins
Life 2023, 13(2), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020572 - 17 Feb 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2819
Abstract
Strong numerical and functional responses of owls to voles in cyclic environments are well known. However, there is insufficient knowledge from the boreonemoral region in particular, with depleted populations of small mammals. In this study, we describe the dynamics of the small mammal [...] Read more.
Strong numerical and functional responses of owls to voles in cyclic environments are well known. However, there is insufficient knowledge from the boreonemoral region in particular, with depleted populations of small mammals. In this study, we describe the dynamics of the small mammal population in Latvia from 1991 to 2016 and link them to owl population characteristics. We used food niche breadth, number of fledglings, and population trends to lay out the numerical response of six owl species to dampened small mammal population cycles. We found temporarily increasing food niche breadth in tawny and Ural owls. There were no other responses in the tawny owl, whereas the breeding performance of three forest specialist species—pygmy, Tengmalm’s, and Ural owls—corresponded to the vole crash years in Fennoscandia. Moreover, the populations of forest specialist owls decreased, and the change in the Ural owl population can be attributed to the depletion of small mammal populations. We found evidence of a carry-over effect in the eagle owl arising from a strong correlation of declining breeding performance with the small mammal abundance indices in the previous autumn. We conclude that dampening of the small mammal population cycles is an important covariate of the likely effects of habitat destruction that needs to be investigated further, with stronger responses in more specialized (to prey or habitat) species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abundance and Dynamics of Small Mammals and Their Predators)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2739 KB  
Article
The Long-Lasting Territories of Forest Apex Predators Sustain Diverse Bird Communities throughout the Year
by Łukasz Kajtoch and Bartłomiej Kusal
Forests 2022, 13(12), 2128; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122128 - 12 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2071
Abstract
Apex predators, such as raptors, are used as surrogates to attain conservation objectives; however, their presence in a particular area does not necessarily mean long-term occurrence. Here we used data on long-lasting (20–40 years) territories of two generalist raptors: the diurnal Northern goshawk [...] Read more.
Apex predators, such as raptors, are used as surrogates to attain conservation objectives; however, their presence in a particular area does not necessarily mean long-term occurrence. Here we used data on long-lasting (20–40 years) territories of two generalist raptors: the diurnal Northern goshawk and the nocturnal Ural owl in deciduous and coniferous forests of southern Poland to assess their role as hotspots of bird diversity. Species richness and abundance of birds were much higher in the long-lasting territories of both apex predators than in random never-occupied sites and this pattern was common for breeding and wintering periods. These differences were more pronounced in deciduous than coniferous stands. Rare bird species (e.g., annexed in the Bird Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation of wild birds such as some woodpeckers and flycatchers) were found to be particularly associated with long-lasting territories of raptors. Long-lasting territories were also characterized by greater forest habitat quality (e.g., higher number of old trees and deadwood) with lower management intensity. These results strongly point to the role of long-lasting territories of raptors as surrogates of biodiversity. Such territories, if known in forests, could be excellent for the designation of protected areas or logging there should at least be reduced to allow for the continuous breeding of apex predators and associated bird assemblages. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Biodiversity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2512 KB  
Article
The Application of Quantitative Metabolomics for the Taxonomic Differentiation of Birds
by Ekaterina A. Zelentsova, Lyudmila V. Yanshole, Yuri P. Tsentalovich, Kirill A. Sharshov and Vadim V. Yanshole
Biology 2022, 11(7), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071089 - 21 Jul 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3330
Abstract
In the current pilot study, we propose the use of quantitative metabolomics to reconstruct the phylogeny of vertebrates, namely birds. We determined the concentrations of the 67 most abundant metabolites in the eye lenses of the following 14 species from 6 orders of [...] Read more.
In the current pilot study, we propose the use of quantitative metabolomics to reconstruct the phylogeny of vertebrates, namely birds. We determined the concentrations of the 67 most abundant metabolites in the eye lenses of the following 14 species from 6 orders of the class Aves (Birds): the Black kite (Milvus migrans), Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), Northern raven (Corvus corax), Eurasian coot (Fulica atra), Godlewski’s bunting (Emberiza godlewskii), Great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus), Great tit (Parus major), Hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes), Hooded crow (Corvus cornix), House sparrow (Passer domesticus), Rock dove (Columba livia), Rook (Corvus frugilegus), Short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) and Ural owl (Strix uralensis). Further analysis shows that the statistical approaches generally used in metabolomics can be applied for differentiation between species, and the most fruitful results were obtained with hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA). We observed the grouping of conspecific samples independently of the sampling place and date. The HCA tree structure supports the key role of genomics in the formation of the lens metabolome, but it also indicates the influence of the species lifestyle. A combination of genomics-based and metabolomics-based phylogeny could potentially resolve arising issues and yield a more reliable tree of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution and Ecology of Phenotypes in Nature)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1195 KB  
Article
Herpesvirus Infection in a Breeding Population of Two Coexisting Strix Owls
by Zoran Žlabravec, Al Vrezec, Brigita Slavec, Urška Kuhar, Olga Zorman Rojs and Joško Račnik
Animals 2021, 11(9), 2519; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092519 - 27 Aug 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3066
Abstract
Birds are a frequent host of a large variety of herpesviruses, and infections in them may go unnoticed or may result in fatal disease. In wild breeding populations of owls, there is very limited information about the presence, impact, and potential transmission of [...] Read more.
Birds are a frequent host of a large variety of herpesviruses, and infections in them may go unnoticed or may result in fatal disease. In wild breeding populations of owls, there is very limited information about the presence, impact, and potential transmission of herpesvirus. The herpesvirus partial DNA polymerase gene was detected using polymerase chain reaction in oropharyngeal swabs of 16 out of 170 owls examined that were captured in or near nest boxes. Herpesvirus was detected in Ural owls (Strix uralensis), in both adults and young, but not in tawny owls (Strix aluco). In yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis), as the main prey of tawny owls and Ural owls in the area, herpesvirus was detected in the organs of 2 out of 40 mice captured at the same locations as the owls. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the herpesvirus sequences detected in the Ural owls differed from the herpesvirus sequences detected in the yellow-necked mice. The results indicate that herpesvirus infection exists in the breeding wild Ural owl population. However, herpesvirus-infected owls did not show any clinical or productivity deviances and, based on a phylogenetic comparison of detected herpesvirus sequences and sequences obtained from Genbank database, it seems that mice and other rodents are not the source of owl infections. The most probable transmission pathway is intraspecific, especially from adults to their chicks, but the origin of herpesvirus in owls remains to be investigated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wildlife)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop