Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = TransPRK

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 2747 KB  
Article
The Impact of Preoperative Corneal Epithelial Refraction Toricity on Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy for the Treatment of Hyperopia or Mixed Astigmatism
by Diego de Ortueta and Samuel Arba-Mosquera
Vision 2025, 9(3), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030057 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1022
Abstract
This study analyzed the impact of corneal epithelial refraction on the correction of hyperopic and mixed astigmatism eyes treated with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. From the epithelial refraction provided by the diagnostic device, OCT correlations were evaluated with respect to manifest refraction. The postoperative [...] Read more.
This study analyzed the impact of corneal epithelial refraction on the correction of hyperopic and mixed astigmatism eyes treated with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. From the epithelial refraction provided by the diagnostic device, OCT correlations were evaluated with respect to manifest refraction. The postoperative outcomes showed a mean sphere of −0.03 D and a mean cylinder of −0.33 D, with 93% and 98% having 0.5 D, 1 D, or less spherical equivalent refractive error. The epithelium showed preoperative toricity: at 6 mm, the epithelium showed a compensational effect of ~15% for the refractive astigmatism, whereas at 3 mm, the compensation accounted for ~25% of the refractive astigmatism. No correlation was found between preoperative epithelial refraction and refractive deviation after hyperopic or mixed astigmatic transepithelial photorefractive treatment. This work provides insight into the refractive compensatory impact of the epithelium, suggests how one can benefit from that in transepithelial corrections, and sets a framework for the potential induction of errors in non-transepithelial corrections. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1385 KB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Performed with Smart Pulse Technology for the Correction of Moderate to High Myopia
by Tony Ho
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3058; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113058 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3826
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) performed using smart pulse technology (SPT) in myopic eyes with refractive error ranging from −5.25 D to −9.75 D. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of SPT-assisted [...] Read more.
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) performed using smart pulse technology (SPT) in myopic eyes with refractive error ranging from −5.25 D to −9.75 D. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of SPT-assisted TransPRK in 150 eyes performed using a 1050 Hz AMARIS excimer laser. Results: At 6 months postoperative, 98% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/25 or better, and postoperative UDVA within one line of preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). No eyes lost any line of CDVA. Residual spherical equivalent refraction and cylinder within ±0.50 D of intended correction were achieved in 72% and 67% of eyes, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of eyes reported no halos and glare. Conclusions: TransPRK using a 1050 Hz excimer laser with SPT showed excellent predictability, safety, and efficacy for moderate to high myopia correction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 309 KB  
Review
Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy—Review
by Christopher Way, Mohamed Gamal Elghobaier and Mayank A. Nanavaty
Vision 2024, 8(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8010016 - 21 Mar 2024
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 8025
Abstract
The type and nature of refractive surgery procedures has greatly increased over the past few decades, allowing for almost all patient populations to be treated to extremely high satisfaction. Conventional photorefractive keratectomy involves the removal of the corneal epithelium through mechanical debridement or [...] Read more.
The type and nature of refractive surgery procedures has greatly increased over the past few decades, allowing for almost all patient populations to be treated to extremely high satisfaction. Conventional photorefractive keratectomy involves the removal of the corneal epithelium through mechanical debridement or dilute alcohol instillation. An improvement to this method utilises laser epithelial removal in a single-step process termed transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK). We explore the history of transPRK from its early adoption as a two-step process, identify different transPRK platforms from major manufacturers, and describe the role of transPRK in the refractive surgery armamentarium. This is a narrative review of the literature. This review finds that TransPRK is a safe and effective procedure that works across a variety of patient populations. Though often not seen as a primary treatment option when compared to other corneal-based procedures that offer a faster and more comfortable recovery, there are many scenarios in which these procedures are not possible. These include, but are not limited to, cases of corneal instability, previous refractive surgery, or transplant where higher-order aberrations can impair vision in a manner not amenable to spectacle or contact lens correction. We discuss refinements to the procedure that would help improve outcomes, including optimising patient discomfort after surgery as well as reducing corneal haze and refractive regression. Full article
19 pages, 21565 KB  
Article
Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
by Paul Filip Curcă, Cătălina Ioana Tătaru, George Sima, Marian Burcea and Călin Petru Tătaru
Diagnostics 2024, 14(5), 481; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14050481 - 23 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4913
Abstract
(1) Background: Laser-assisted refractive surgery is a safe and effective surgical correction of refractive error. For most patients, both the newer Trans-PRK and the established LASIK technique can produce the required surgical correction, sparking the question of which technique should be opted for. [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Laser-assisted refractive surgery is a safe and effective surgical correction of refractive error. For most patients, both the newer Trans-PRK and the established LASIK technique can produce the required surgical correction, sparking the question of which technique should be opted for. (2) Methods: The study prospectively evaluated 121 patients (230 eyes) for at least one month postoperatively; 66 patients (126 eyes) and 45 patients (85 eyes) returned for 6 months and 1 year follow-up. (3) Results: No statistical difference was recorded at 1 week or 1 month post-operation. At 6 months, a difference was found for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK −0.0476 ± 0.7012 versus FS-LASIK +0.425 ± 0.874, p = 0.004) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK −0.1994 ± 0.0294 versus FS-LASIK +0.225 ± 0.646, p = 0.025) but not for CYL D (Trans-PRK −0.3036 ± 0.5251 versus FS-LASIK −0.4 ± 0.820, p = 0.499). Uncorrected visual acuity was better for Trans-PRK 6 months post-operation (UCVA logMAR 0.02523 versus 0.0768 logMAR; p = 0.015 logMAR). At 1-year, Trans-PRK was favored for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK −0.0294 ± 0.6493 versus FS-LASIK +0.646 ± 0.909, p < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK −0.218 ± 0.784 versus FS-LASIK 0.372 ± 1.08, p = 0.007). Overall speed in visual recovery, variance of results and surgically induced astigmatism were in favor of Trans-PRK. (4) Conclusions: The study reported improvements for Trans-PRK patients, with both techniques found to be safe and effective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Eye Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3065 KB  
Article
Refractive Effect of Epithelial Remodelling in Myopia after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy
by Diego de Ortueta, Dennis von Rüden and Samuel Arba-Mosquera
Vision 2022, 6(4), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6040074 - 13 Dec 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3988
Abstract
(1) Introduction: We analysed epithelial changes after the treatment of moderate myopia with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. (2) Materials and Methods: We used optical coherence tomography data and analysed changes in the stroma and epithelium after ablation. We aimed to ascertain how much epithelium [...] Read more.
(1) Introduction: We analysed epithelial changes after the treatment of moderate myopia with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. (2) Materials and Methods: We used optical coherence tomography data and analysed changes in the stroma and epithelium after ablation. We aimed to ascertain how much epithelium hyperplasia occurred after TransPRK; for this, we used data from 50 eyes treated with TransPRK with the AMARIS 1050 Hz, with a minimum follow-up of 4 months. (3) Results: The measured epithelial changes corresponded to a less than 0.1 ± 0.2D of spherical effect, less than 0.2 ± 0.2D of astigmatic effect, and less than 0.5 ± 0.2D of comatic effect. (4) Conclusions: The changes in epithelial thickness after aberration-neutral transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for moderate myopia were very small, indicating a low level of epithelial hyperplasia without resembling a regression-inducing lentoid. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 561 KB  
Article
A New Postoperative Regimen after CXL and PRK Using Topical NSAID and Steroids on the Open Ocular Surface
by Farhad Hafezi, Mark Hillen, Leonard Kollros, Jerry Tan and Shady T. Awwad
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(14), 4109; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144109 - 15 Jul 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5685
Abstract
Corneal epithelium removal during photorefractive keratotomy (PRK), TransPRK, or corneal cross-linking (CXL) means that patients experience pain and inflammation after the procedure, which need to be carefully managed with topical drug regimens. One highly effective class of topical analgesics is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [...] Read more.
Corneal epithelium removal during photorefractive keratotomy (PRK), TransPRK, or corneal cross-linking (CXL) means that patients experience pain and inflammation after the procedure, which need to be carefully managed with topical drug regimens. One highly effective class of topical analgesics is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but these must be used carefully, as their use has been associated with delayed re-epithelialization and, in rare cases, corneal melting. However, our clinical experience has been that the concomitant use of topical corticosteroids obviates this risk. Here, we present a mechanistic explanation for our observations, our TransPRK and epithelium-off CXL protocols, and the postoperative medication regimens where topical NSAIDs are used in combination with topical steroid therapy during the first two postoperative days (where pain and inflammation levels are the highest). We detail the results of a single-center retrospective case analysis that examined eyes that underwent TransPRK (n = 301) or epithelium-off CXL (n = 576). Topical NSAID use in the first two postoperative days to control pain and inflammation after PRK/TransPRK or epithelium-off CXL, when used in combination with topical steroid therapy, does not appear to be associated with corneal melting or delayed epithelial healing. This approach may represent an improvement over current methods of handling post-surgical pain in procedures that require corneal epithelial debridement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corneal Surgery: From Innovation to Clinical Praxis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2816 KB  
Article
Customized versus Standard Epithelium Profiles in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy
by Diego de Ortueta, Dennis von Rüden and Samuel Arba-Mosquera
Optics 2021, 2(4), 266-275; https://doi.org/10.3390/opt2040025 - 1 Dec 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4599
Abstract
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is an established surface ablation technique used to correct refractive errors. Using anterior segment optical coherence (AS-OCT), it is now possible to measure the epithelium thickness and input these data into the laser platform. In this study, we explore [...] Read more.
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) is an established surface ablation technique used to correct refractive errors. Using anterior segment optical coherence (AS-OCT), it is now possible to measure the epithelium thickness and input these data into the laser platform. In this study, we explore whether better results were obtained in this way. To this end, we retrospectively analyze the results from a low-myopia group treated with a customized epithelium thickness, as measured using AS-OCT, and compare them with the results from a group treated with an optimized standard epithelium thickness. The customized epithelium profile group contains more eyes with vision better than 20/20, and more eyes in this group gain one line of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). In conclusion, with the customized epithelium thickness, we obtain superior results using TransPRK in low-myopia corrections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Research on Optometry and Vision Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4306 KB  
Article
Comparison of Refractive and Visual Outcomes after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) in Low versus Moderate Myopia
by Diego de Ortueta, Dennis von Rüden and Samuel Arba-Mosquera
Photonics 2021, 8(7), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070262 - 6 Jul 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 6060
Abstract
Is it possible to obtain good results in myopia of 2 or fewer diopters (D) with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness? We retrospectively analyzed two groups of 296 eyes with a minimum follow-up of 4 months. Group [...] Read more.
Is it possible to obtain good results in myopia of 2 or fewer diopters (D) with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness? We retrospectively analyzed two groups of 296 eyes with a minimum follow-up of 4 months. Group A had 2 or less D, treated with an optical zone (OZ) 0.2 mm bigger than recommended, and a central epithelium thickness of 60 microns, and group B had 2 D to 5 D, with the recommended optical zone, and a 55-micron epithelium ablation at the center. The outcomes were not different between the two myopic ranges; the postop uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 ± 4 in both groups (p = 0.2), which was −0.3 ± 0.8 lines worse than the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity in both groups (p = 0.5). The safety of the treatments resulted in a change of 0.0 ± 0.7 lines in the low myopia group, versus a gain of +0.1 ± 0.8 lines in the moderate myopia group (p = 0.1). The deviation from the intended target was −0.04 ± 0.33 D in the low myopia group and +0.07 ± 0.32 D in the moderate myopia group (p < 0.0001); the postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.00 ± 0.33 D in the low myopia group and +0.10 ± 0.31 D in the moderate myopia group (p < 0.0001). The postop refractive astigmatism was 0.32 ± 0.16 D in both groups (p = 0.5). In conclusion, the refractive and visual outcomes after TransPRK are comparable in low myopia changing the optical zone and epithelium thickness versus moderate myopia with standard optical zone and epithelium thickness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Visual Optics and Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 805 KB  
Article
Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratektomy after a Clear Lens Exchange
by Diego de Ortueta
Vision 2021, 5(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5010008 - 3 Feb 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3706
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the refractive visual outcomes and efficacy of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) using Smart Pulse Technology with static and dynamic cyclotorsion and the AMARIS 1050 Hz RS laser platform from Schwind in the eyes after a refractive lens exchange. Setting/Venue: Aurelios [...] Read more.
Purpose: We evaluated the refractive visual outcomes and efficacy of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) using Smart Pulse Technology with static and dynamic cyclotorsion and the AMARIS 1050 Hz RS laser platform from Schwind in the eyes after a refractive lens exchange. Setting/Venue: Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum, Recklinghausen. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 552 consecutive eyes treated with refractive lens exchange between 2016 and 2019. A total of 47 eyes (8.5%) required a touch up after the clear lens exchange. From 43 eyes of 43 patients, we obtained a minimum follow up of 3 months. In all cases, we performed a TransPRK with a minimum optical zone of 7.2 mm, centering the ablation on the vertex of the cornea. Results: The average age of the treated eyes was 57 years old, with a range between 48 and 68 years. The mean treated sphere was 0.42 diopters (D), with a range between −1.0 and +1.75 D. The mean astigmatism was 1.06 D. Postoperatively, after laser vision correction, we reduced the sphere to a mean of 0.11 D (range −0.5 to +0.75 D), and, postoperatively, the mean astigmatism was 0.25 D (range −0.75 to 0 D). The predictability for a spheric equivalent (SEQ) of 0.5 D was 91%, and for 1 D it was 100% of the cases. No eye lost more than one Snellen line. Conclusions: TransPRK with smart pulse was predictable for correcting ametropia after Clear Lens Surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop