Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = acute levodopa challenge

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 3201 KB  
Article
Acute Levodopa Challenge in Atypical Parkinsonism: Comprehensive Analysis of Individual Motor Responses
by Lan Ye, Sam Sadeghi Sani, Linda Veith Sanches, Lea Farina Magdalena Krey, Florian Wegner, Matthias Höllerhage, Christoph Schrader, Günter Höglinger and Martin Klietz
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(10), 991; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14100991 - 29 Sep 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4168
Abstract
The acute levodopa challenge is widely used to distinguish Parkinson’s disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APSs) such as multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). In APSs, very few patients present a clinically relevant response to levodopa. The aim of [...] Read more.
The acute levodopa challenge is widely used to distinguish Parkinson’s disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APSs) such as multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). In APSs, very few patients present a clinically relevant response to levodopa. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with atypical parkinsonism benefit from levodopa in any aspect of their multiple motor deficits despite the generally poor response. This retrospective study analyzed individual motor responses to the acute levodopa challenge using the MDS-UPDRS III in 47 PSP, 26 MSA, and 71 PD patients at Hannover Medical School. Despite the generally poor levodopa response in both PSP and MSA patients, bradykinesia and rigidity were the symptoms most notably affected by levodopa in PSP patients, while MSA patients experienced significant improvements in bradykinesia and action tremor. These findings underscore the variability in levodopa response among PSP and MSA patients and highlight the need for personalized treatment approaches in atypical parkinsonism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Approaches in the Exploration of Parkinson’s Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

46 pages, 928 KB  
Systematic Review
Pharmacological Treatments for Cocaine Craving: What Is the Way Forward? A Systematic Review
by Dângela Layne Silva Lassi, André Malbergier, André Brooking Negrão, Lígia Florio, João P. De Aquino and João Maurício Castaldelli-Maia
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(11), 1546; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12111546 - 14 Nov 2022
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 18329
Abstract
Background: cocaine craving is a core feature of cocaine use disorder and remains a critical challenge for abstinence and relapse prevention. This review summarizes the anti-craving efficacy of pharmacotherapies tested for cocaine use disorder, in the context of randomized-controlled clinical trials. Objectives: we [...] Read more.
Background: cocaine craving is a core feature of cocaine use disorder and remains a critical challenge for abstinence and relapse prevention. This review summarizes the anti-craving efficacy of pharmacotherapies tested for cocaine use disorder, in the context of randomized-controlled clinical trials. Objectives: we assessed the databases of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO, without date restrictions up to August 2022, to identify relevant studies. Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: we included double-blinded randomized-controlled trials investigating pharmacotherapies for cocaine craving and/or cocaine use disorder whose outcomes included cocaine craving. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two authors screened studies’ titles and abstracts for inclusion, and both read all the included studies. We systematically gathered information on the following aspects of each study: title; author(s); year of publication; sample size; mean age; sample characteristics; study set-ting; whether participants were treatment-seeking; study design; craving measures; study interventions; drop-out rates; and other relevant outcomes. Results: Overall, we appraised 130 clinical trials, including 8137 participants. We further considered the drugs from the studies that scored equal to or greater than six points in the quality assessment. There was a correlation between craving and cocaine use outcomes (self-reports, timeline follow-back or urinary benzoylecgonine) in the vast majority of studies. In the short-term treatment, acute phenylalanine-tyrosine depletion, clonidine, fenfluramine, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) and mecamylamine presented promising effects. In the long term, amphetamine, biperiden, carbamazepine, lisdexamfetamine, lorcaserin, methamphetamine, mirtazapine, pioglitazone, progesterone, guanfacine, levodopa, nefazodone presented promising anti-craving effects. Unfortunately, the highly tested medications were not successful in most of the trials, as follows: propranolol in the short term; amantadine, aripiprazole, bromocriptine, citicoline, ketamine, modafinil, olanzapine, topiramate in the long term. The remaining 52 medications had no positive anti-craving outcomes. Limitations: Our review was limited by high heterogeneity of craving assessments across the studies and by a great range of pharmacotherapies. Further, the majority of the studies considered abstinence and retention in treatment as the main outcomes, whereas craving was a secondary outcome and some of the studies evaluated patients with cocaine use disorder with comorbidities such as opioid or alcohol use disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity. Lastly, most of the studies also included non-pharmacological treatments, such as counseling or psychotherapy. Conclusions: There is a direct association between craving and cocaine use, underscoring craving as an important treatment target for promoting abstinence among persons with cocaine use disorder. Clonidine, fenfluramine and m-CPP showed to be promising medications for cocaine craving in the short-term treatment, and amphetamine, biperiden, carbamazepine, lisdexamfetamine, lorcaserin, methamphetamine, mirtazapine, pioglitazone, progesterone, guanfacine, levodopa, nefazodone in the long-term treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropharmacology and Neuropathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

125 KB  
Article
Stimulation cérébrale profonde dans la maladie de Parkinson: effets moteurs et comportementaux
by A. Berney and François Vingerhoets
Swiss Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry Psychother. 2004, 155(8), 399-406; https://doi.org/10.4414/sanp.2004.01535 - 1 Jan 2004
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 68
Abstract
The last 15 years have seen the progressive introduction of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. This advance has been possible thanks to better understanding of the organisation of the basal ganglia with parallel segregated loops involved in the control [...] Read more.
The last 15 years have seen the progressive introduction of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. This advance has been possible thanks to better understanding of the organisation of the basal ganglia with parallel segregated loops involved in the control of movement, behaviour, mood and cognition that interact through interneurons or collateral projections. Deep-brain stimulation, which allows by stimulation adjustments to optimise the benefit/side effect ratio, has made possible bilateral treatments needed for treating Parkinson’s disease, while former available lesions were contraindicated because of the substantial side effects they produced. Thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus was the first target. It affects the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway and is mainly effective on tremor with little benefit on the other signs of Parkinson’s disease. For Parkinson’s disease it has progressively completely been replaced by the two other targets and is currently mainly used to treat medication-resistant essential tremor. Internal posterior part of globus pallidus acts on the common output nucleus of the basal ganglia loops. It has been proven very effective for treating motor fluctuations, mainly dyskinesia. Its effects on motor signs of Parkinson’s disease are moderate and variably observed probably secondary to the organization of this relatively large nucleus, with deep-brain stimulation effects depending upon precise localisation. Globus pallidus deep-brain stimulation does not allow antiparkinsonian medication reduction, in contrast to subthalamic deep-brain stimulation, but necessitates a progressive increase of drugs, with some decrease in efficacy with time. Globus pallidus being very effective on dyskinesia is currently rather used to treat other movement disorders, e.g. dystonia. Subthalamic deep-brain stimulation has become the main target for treating Parkinson’s disease. It is acting on the indirect pathway, correcting the subthalamic hyperactivity secondary to disinhibition following dopamine depletion in Parkinson’s disease. Subthalamic deep-brain stimulation improves the four major signs of Parkinson’s disease, with effects mimicking levodopa: response to levodopa challenge being one of the best predictive parameters of the response to subthalamic deep-brain stimulation. This treatment allows substantial antiparkinsonian drug reduction. The latter is the main responsible for dyskinesia reduction observed after subthalamic deep-brain stimulation. Subthalamic deepbrain stimulation effects are maintained for at least 5 years although increase in axial signs and dementia is observed with Parkinson’s disease progression. Beside the motor effects, deep-brain stimulation may induce acute or chronic neuro-behavioural changes. The former is probably secondary to direct effect on structures adjacent to the targeted nuclei or involvement of parallel basal ganglia circuitry. The latter, which develops over months or years, is possibly also related to medication changes, neuronal plasticity following deep-brain stimulation, adaptation difficulties and dramatic socio-familial modification induced by the motor effects of deep-brain stimulation. Depression, apathy, anxiety, mania, pathological gambling, sexual behaviours and hallucinations have all been described following deep-brain stimulation. These changes, which underline the importance of basal ganglia circuitry in mood and behaviour, may have severe consequences including suicides. If the acute effects can usually easily be corrected by deep-brain stimulation tuning, the chronic modifications need to be detected and often necessitate a multidisciplinary approach. This careful multidisciplinary (neurologist, neuropsy-chologist, neurosurgeon, psychiatrist) collaboration is important not only for the selection but also for the follow-up of Parkinson’s disease patients treated by deep-brain stimulation. Full article
Back to TopTop