Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = alternative defibrillation strategies

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 607 KB  
Systematic Review
Enhancing Patient Safety in Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Double Sequential and Vector Change Defibrillation Barriers
by Kyriakos Alexandrou, Elina Khattab and Evanthia Asimakopoulou
Healthcare 2025, 13(20), 2645; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202645 - 21 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1858
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the most common shockable rhythm in cardiac arrest, yet refractory VF (RVF), defined as persistent VF after ≥three failed defibrillation attempts, poses a significant challenge. Two alternative strategies, double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) and vector change (VC) defibrillation, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the most common shockable rhythm in cardiac arrest, yet refractory VF (RVF), defined as persistent VF after ≥three failed defibrillation attempts, poses a significant challenge. Two alternative strategies, double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) and vector change (VC) defibrillation, aim to enhance defibrillation success where conventional methods fail. This review evaluates the clinical feasibility, safety, and implementation barriers of DSED and VC in RVF cases. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published between January 2015 and August 2025. Eligible studies included adult RVF patients treated with DSED or VC. Outcomes assessed included implementation barriers, safety concerns, and methodological limitations. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Identified barriers were grouped into practical and methodological categories. Practical barriers included the need for dual defibrillators and pads, delays in shock coordination, inconsistent protocols, equipment compatibility issues, and dependence on trained personnel. Methodological barriers included small sample sizes, retrospective designs, inconsistent RVF definitions, and incomplete reporting of neurological outcomes. Conclusions: DSED and VC defibrillation may offer potential benefits in managing RVF, but their use is hindered by significant practical and methodological barriers. Due to the limited number of randomized trials, further high-quality studies with standardized definitions and safety endpoints are needed to clarify their clinical utility and inform implementation. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1197 KB  
Systematic Review
Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Symptomatic Brugada Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
by Paschalis Karakasis, Panagiotis Theofilis, Konstantinos Pamporis, Antonios P. Antoniadis and Nikolaos Fragakis
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030115 - 6 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2595
Abstract
Background: Catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for symptomatic Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, high-quality comparative evidence against conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-based management remains limited. Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of catheter [...] Read more.
Background: Catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for symptomatic Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, high-quality comparative evidence against conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-based management remains limited. Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of catheter ablation in reducing ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence in symptomatic BrS compared to standard therapy. Methods: Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched through 1 June 2025. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently conducted by three reviewers. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool risk estimates. Results: Three studies (two randomized controlled trials, one observational cohort; 130 symptomatic BrS patients) were included. Over a median follow-up of 3.9 years, catheter ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of VF recurrence compared to standard therapy [risk ratio (RR) = 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.06, 0.60); I2 = 36%, p for heterogeneity = 0.21], with no deaths reported in any group. A sensitivity analysis restricted to randomized trials confirmed similar findings in favor of ablation. Conclusions: Catheter ablation was associated with reduced VF recurrence compared to ICD therapy alone, supporting its potential role as first-line treatment in symptomatic BrS or as an alternative for patients who decline ICD implantation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 900 KB  
Review
Beyond Standard Shocks: A Critical Review of Alternative Defibrillation Strategies in Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation
by Benedetta Perna, Matteo Guarino, Roberto De Fazio, Ludovica Esposito, Andrea Portoraro, Federica Rossin, Michele Domenico Spampinato and Roberto De Giorgio
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5016; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145016 - 15 Jul 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 6606
Abstract
Background: Refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the persistence of ventricular fibrillation despite multiple defibrillation attempts. It represents a critical challenge in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management, with poor survival outcomes and limited guidance from current resuscitation guidelines. In [...] Read more.
Background: Refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the persistence of ventricular fibrillation despite multiple defibrillation attempts. It represents a critical challenge in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management, with poor survival outcomes and limited guidance from current resuscitation guidelines. In recent years, alternative defibrillation strategies (ADSs), including dual sequential external defibrillation (DSED) and vector change defibrillation (VCD), have emerged as potential interventions to improve defibrillation success and patient outcomes. However, their clinical utility remains debated due to heterogeneous evidence and limited high-quality data. Methods: This narrative review explores the current landscape of ADSs in patients with RVF. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, the World Health Organization, LitCovid NLM, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library were examined from their inception to April 2025. Results: The available literature is dominated by retrospective studies and case series, with only one randomized controlled trial (DOSE-VF). This trial demonstrated improved survival to hospital discharge with ADSs compared to standard defibrillation. DSED was associated with higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurological outcomes. However, subsequent meta-analyses have produced inconsistent results, largely due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. The absence of sex-, gender-, and ethnicity-specific analyses further limits the generalizability of the findings. In addition, practical barriers, such as equipment availability, pose significant challenges to implementation. Conclusions: ADSs represent a promising yet still-evolving approach to the management of RVF, with DSED showing the most consistent signal of benefit. Further high-quality research is required to enhance generalizability and generate more definitive, high-level evidence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Emergency Medicine)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1546 KB  
Article
Efficacy of Single-Dose Del Nido Cardioplegia Beyond 90 Minutes in Adult Cardiac Surgery
by Murat Yücel, Emrah Uğuz, Kemal Eşref Erdoğan and Erol Şener
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2248; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072248 - 26 Mar 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2784
Abstract
Background: Del Nido (DN) cardioplegia is widely used in cardiac surgery for its efficacy in providing myocardial protection for up to 90 min with a single dose. However, its safety and efficacy during prolonged ischemia remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 471 [...] Read more.
Background: Del Nido (DN) cardioplegia is widely used in cardiac surgery for its efficacy in providing myocardial protection for up to 90 min with a single dose. However, its safety and efficacy during prolonged ischemia remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 471 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB between January 2019 and September 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: ACC durations of 60–90 min (Group A, n = 240) and >90 min (Group B, n = 231). The perioperative characteristics, clinical outcomes, and biochemical markers were compared to evaluate the impact of prolonged ischemia. Results: Patients in Group B exhibited significantly higher postoperative troponin I and lactate levels at 4 h post-CPB, suggesting increased myocardial and metabolic stress. Lactate levels normalized within 24 h, indicating transient myocardial dysfunction. Defibrillation requirements and vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) were also significantly elevated in Group B, reflecting compromised myocardial electrical stability and hemodynamic challenges. However, the long-term outcomes such as mortality, LCOS, and MODS showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: While DN cardioplegia provides sufficient myocardial protection for ACC durations within 90 min, its efficacy diminishes during prolonged ischemia, as evidenced by increased myocardial injury and hemodynamic instability. Tailored strategies, including standardized redosing protocols and enhanced perioperative management, are essential for optimizing outcomes in complex surgeries with extended ischemia times. Further prospective studies are needed to refine these protocols and assess alternative solutions for myocardial protection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiac Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 625 KB  
Review
Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation: Retrospective Analysis and Prospective Outlooks—A Comprehensive Review
by Laura Adina Stanciulescu and Radu Vatasescu
Biomedicines 2024, 12(2), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12020266 - 24 Jan 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 6672
Abstract
Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia associated with an overall high morbi-mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Despite their pivotal role in preventing sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, although a guideline-based class I recommendation, are unable to prevent arrhythmic episodes [...] Read more.
Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia associated with an overall high morbi-mortality, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. Despite their pivotal role in preventing sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, although a guideline-based class I recommendation, are unable to prevent arrhythmic episodes and significantly alter the quality of life by delivering recurrent therapies. From open-heart surgical ablation to the currently widely used percutaneous approach, catheter ablation is a safe and effective procedure able to target the responsible re-entry myocardial circuit from both the endocardium and the epicardium. There are four main mapping strategies, activation, entrainment, pace, and substrate mapping, each of them with their own advantages and limitations. The contemporary guideline-based recommendations for VT ablation primarily apply to patients experiencing antiarrhythmic drug ineffectiveness or those intolerant to the pharmacological treatment. Although highly effective in most cases of scar-related VTs, the traditional approach may sometimes be insufficient, especially in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies, where circuits may be unmappable using the classic techniques. Alternative methods have been proposed, such as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation or radiotherapy ablation, surgical ablation, needle ablation, transarterial coronary ethanol ablation, and retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation, with promising results. Further studies are needed in order to prove the overall efficacy of these methods in comparison to standard radiofrequency delivery. Nevertheless, as the field of cardiac electrophysiology continues to evolve, it is important to acknowledge the role of artificial intelligence in both the pre-procedural planning and the intervention itself. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 664 KB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review on S-ICD Lead Extraction
by Riccardo Vio, Enrico Forlin, Viktor Čulić, Sakis Themistoclakis, Riccardo Proietti and Paolo China
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(11), 3710; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113710 - 27 May 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2872
Abstract
Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications sometimes requiring complete device removal. [...] Read more.
Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications sometimes requiring complete device removal. Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to gather all the available literature on S-ICD lead extraction (SLE), with particular reference to the type of indication, techniques, complications and success rate. Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to 21 November 2022. The search strategy adopted was developed using the following key words: subcutaneous, S-ICD, defibrillator, ICD, extraction, explantation. Studies were included if they met both of the following criteria: (1) inclusion of patients with S-ICD; (2) inclusion of patients who underwent SLE. Results: Our literature search identified 238 references. Based on the abstract evaluation, 38 of these citations were considered potentially eligible for inclusion, and their full texts were analyzed. We excluded 8 of these studies because no SLE was performed. Eventually, 30 studies were included, with 207 patients who underwent SLE. Overall, the majority of SLEs were performed for non-infective causes (59.90%). Infection of the device (affecting either the lead or the pocket) was the cause of SLE in 38.65% of cases. Indication data were not available in 3/207 cases. The mean dwelling time was 14 months. SLEs were performed using manual traction or with the aid of a tool designed for transvenous lead extraction (TLE), including either a rotational or non-powered mechanical dilator sheath. Conclusions: SLE is performed mainly for non-infective causes. Techniques vary greatly across different studies. Dedicated tools for SLE might be developed in the future and standard approaches should be defined. In the meantime, authors are encouraged to share their experience and data to further refine the existing variegated approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 841 KB  
Review
Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia: Current Technology and Evolving Indications
by Fabrizio Guarracini, Massimo Tritto, Antonio Di Monaco, Marco Valerio Mariani, Alessio Gasperetti, Paolo Compagnucci, Daniele Muser, Alberto Preda, Patrizio Mazzone, Sakis Themistoclakis and Corrado Carbucicchio
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(4), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10040172 - 17 Apr 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5496
Abstract
Ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. According to current guidelines, cardioverter defibrillator implantation, antiarrhythmic drugs, and catheter ablation are established therapies in the management of ventricular arrhythmias but their efficacy is limited in [...] Read more.
Ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. According to current guidelines, cardioverter defibrillator implantation, antiarrhythmic drugs, and catheter ablation are established therapies in the management of ventricular arrhythmias but their efficacy is limited in some cases. Sustained ventricular tachycardia can be terminated by cardioverter-defibrillator therapies although shocks in particular have been demonstrated to increase mortality and worsen patients’ quality of life. Antiarrhythmic drugs have important side effects and relatively low efficacy, while catheter ablation, even if it is actually an established treatment, is an invasive procedure with intrinsic procedural risks and is frequently affected by patients’ hemodynamic instability. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular arrhythmias was developed as bail-out therapy in patients unresponsive to traditional treatments. Radiotherapy has been mainly applied in the oncological field, but new current perspectives have developed in the field of ventricular arrhythmias. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation provides an alternative non-invasive and painless therapeutic strategy for the treatment of previously detected cardiac arrhythmic substrate by three-dimensional intracardiac mapping or different tools. Since preliminary experiences have been reported, several retrospective studies, registries, and case reports have been published in the literature. Although, for now, stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation is considered an alternative palliative treatment for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and no other therapeutic options, this research field is currently extremely promising. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ventricular Arrhythmias: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5520 KB  
Article
In Vitro Drug Screening Using iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes of a Long QT-Syndrome Patient Carrying KCNQ1 & TRPM4 Dual Mutation: An Experimental Personalized Treatment
by Feifei Wang, Yafan Han, Wanyue Sang, Lu Wang, Xiaoyan Liang, Liang Wang, Qiang Xing, Yankai Guo, Jianghua Zhang, Ling Zhang, Tuerhong Zukela, Jiasuoer Xiaokereti, Yanmei Lu, Xianhui Zhou, Baopeng Tang and Yaodong Li
Cells 2022, 11(16), 2495; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11162495 - 11 Aug 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4134
Abstract
Congenital long QT syndrome is a type of inherited cardiovascular disorder characterized by prolonged QT interval. Patient often suffer from syncopal episodes, electrocardiographic abnormalities and life-threatening arrhythmia. Given the complexity of the root cause of the disease, a combination of clinical diagnosis and [...] Read more.
Congenital long QT syndrome is a type of inherited cardiovascular disorder characterized by prolonged QT interval. Patient often suffer from syncopal episodes, electrocardiographic abnormalities and life-threatening arrhythmia. Given the complexity of the root cause of the disease, a combination of clinical diagnosis and drug screening using patient-derived cardiomyocytes represents a more effective way to identify potential cures. We identified a long QT syndrome patient carrying a heterozygous KCNQ1 c.656G>A mutation and a heterozygous TRPM4 c.479C>T mutation. Implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in combination with conventional medication demonstrated limited success in ameliorating long-QT-syndrome-related symptoms. Frequent defibrillator discharge also caused deterioration of patient quality of life. Aiming to identify better therapeutic agents and treatment strategy, we established a patient-specific iPSC line carrying the dual mutations and differentiated these patient-specific iPSCs into cardiomyocytes. We discovered that both verapamil and lidocaine substantially shortened the QT interval of the long QT syndrome patient-specific cardiomyocytes. Verapamil treatment was successful in reducing defibrillator discharge frequency of the KCNQ1/TRPM4 dual mutation patient. These results suggested that verapamil and lidocaine could be alternative therapeutic agents for long QT syndrome patients that do not respond well to conventional treatments. In conclusion, our approach indicated the usefulness of the in vitro disease model based on patient-specific iPSCs in identifying pharmacological mechanisms and drug screening. The long QT patient-specific iPSC line carrying KCNQ1/TRPM4 dual mutations also represents a tool for further understanding long QT syndrome pathogenesis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2959 KB  
Article
Vacuum-Implemented Removal of Lead Vegetations in Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis
by Vincenzo Tarzia, Matteo Ponzoni, Giuseppe Evangelista, Chiara Tessari, Emanuele Bertaglia, Manuel De Lazzari, Fabio Zanella, Demetrio Pittarello, Federico Migliore and Gino Gerosa
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4600; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154600 - 7 Aug 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3435
Abstract
When approaching infected lead removal in cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE), a surgical consideration for large (>20 mm) vegetations is recommended. We report our experience with the removal of large CDRIE vegetations using the AngioVac system, as an alternative to conventional surgery. We [...] Read more.
When approaching infected lead removal in cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE), a surgical consideration for large (>20 mm) vegetations is recommended. We report our experience with the removal of large CDRIE vegetations using the AngioVac system, as an alternative to conventional surgery. We retrospectively reviewed all infected lead extractions performed with a prior debulking using the AngioVac system, between October 2016 and April 2022 at our institution. A total of 13 patients presented a mean of 2(1) infected leads after a mean of 5.7(5.7) years from implantation (seven implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, four cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators, and two pacemakers). The AngioVac system was used as a venous–venous bypass in six cases (46.2%), venous–venous ECMO-like circuit (with an oxygenator) in five (38.5%), and venous–arterial ECMO-like circuit in two cases (15.4%). Successful (>70%) aspiration of the vegetations was achieved in 12 patients (92.3%) and an intraoperative complication (cardiac perforation) only occurred in 1 case (7.7%). Subsequent lead extraction was successful in all cases, either manually (38.5%) or using mechanical tools (61.5%). The AngioVac system is a promising effective and safe option for large vegetation debulking in CDRIE. Planning the extracorporeal circuit design may represent the optimal strategy to enhance the tolerability of the procedure and minimize adverse events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop