Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (283)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = aortic regurgitation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1273 KB  
Article
From Bailout to Benchmark? Rethinking the Alfieri Procedure for Mitral Regurgitation in Barlow’s Disease
by Karin Steiner, Bernhard Voss, Miriam Lang, Nikoleta Bozini, Spyridon Soulis, Martin Bichler, Maximilian-Niklas Bonk, Stephanie Voss, Keti Vitanova, Markus Krane and Konstantinos Sideris
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3818; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103818 - 15 May 2026
Viewed by 112
Abstract
Background: Mitral regurgitation due to Barlow’s disease remains surgically demanding. Despite widespread experience, consensus is lacking on whether the Alfieri repair can serve as a deliberate and durable rather than a rescue strategy in this complex pathology. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients [...] Read more.
Background: Mitral regurgitation due to Barlow’s disease remains surgically demanding. Despite widespread experience, consensus is lacking on whether the Alfieri repair can serve as a deliberate and durable rather than a rescue strategy in this complex pathology. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing mitral valve repair due to severe mitral regurgitation resulting from Barlow’s disease using either the Alfieri or Neochordae repair techniques. Patients received a uniform semi–rigid annuloplasty ring, while leaflet resection and concomitant coronary or aortic procedures were excluded. Results: Baseline demographics and echocardiography were broadly comparable. Perioperative mortality was 0% in both cohorts, with similarly low rates of major complications. Aortic cross–clamp time was significantly shorter with Alfieri repair (p < 0.001). No relevant postoperative transmitral gradient or systolic anterior motion occurred. At a mean follow–up of 4.2 years, more–than–moderate MR was observed in one patient per group (Alfieri 2.4% vs. Neochordae 1.2%). At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of more–than–moderate mitral regurgitation and redo mitral surgery was similarly low between techniques (p = 0.810 and p = 0.460). Most patients were NYHA class I–II at last follow–up, demonstrating improved functional status. Echocardiography showed left ventricular reverse remodeling without intergroup differences. Conclusions: These data indicate that the Alfieri approach provides durable competence and hemodynamic safety comparable to the Neochordae technique while reducing cross–clamp time, supporting its use as a deliberate strategy rather than a bailout in anatomically suitable valves. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Therapeutic Advances of Mitral Regurgitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1466 KB  
Proceeding Paper
Uniaxial Tensile Testing of the Native Porcine Pericardium
by Edward Matjeka, Alex G. Kuchumov, Harry M. Ngwangwa, Thanyani Pandelani and Fulufhelo Nemavhola
Mater. Proc. 2026, 31(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2026031023 (registering DOI) - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 99
Abstract
Death rates related to heart failure amount to approximately 50% of deaths globally, and one of the leading causes of heart failure is aortic valve failure, which is treated using prosthetic aortic valves. Porcine pericardium is amongst the materials used to develop a [...] Read more.
Death rates related to heart failure amount to approximately 50% of deaths globally, and one of the leading causes of heart failure is aortic valve failure, which is treated using prosthetic aortic valves. Porcine pericardium is amongst the materials used to develop a potentially ideal bioprosthetic aortic valve. The mechanical properties of native porcine pericardium are necessary for enhancing a prosthetic aortic valve. The aim of this study was to determine the mechanical properties of porcine pericardium and find optimized material parameters for finite element analysis using five isotropic models. Uniaxial rupture tests were performed using Cellscale biotester to measure the force at rupture, stiffness, and deformation at rupture. Tests were done in circumferential and radial directions, and one-way Anova was used to evaluate different behaviors in both directions. The average coefficient of determination was used to find the model that performed better. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Conference on Applied Research and Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1237 KB  
Systematic Review
Valve-in-Valve TAVR in Surgical Stentless Aortic Bioprostheses, a Challenging Scenario
by Sara Saltarocchi, Mizar D’Abramo, Emmanouela Chourda, Paolo De Orchi, Flaminia Spunticchia, Marco Totaro, Mattia Vinciguerra, Silvia Romiti, Gabriele Giunti, Ernesto Greco and Fabio Miraldi
Medicina 2026, 62(5), 844; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050844 - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 258
Abstract
Background and objectives: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has become an established treatment for failed surgical bioprostheses in patients at high surgical risk. However, procedures performed in degenerated stentless aortic valves remain particularly challenging because of the absence of a [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has become an established treatment for failed surgical bioprostheses in patients at high surgical risk. However, procedures performed in degenerated stentless aortic valves remain particularly challenging because of the absence of a radiopaque frame, variable surgical implantation techniques, and a potentially increased risk of coronary obstruction. Evidence in this specific setting is limited. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies reporting ViV TAVI in degenerated stentless surgical bioprostheses. Materials and methods: Case reports and case series were included when patient-level or clearly identifiable data were available. Baseline characteristics, anatomical features, procedural strategies, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed using a descriptive approach. A total of 54 studies were included, encompassing 294 ViV TAVI procedures performed in failed stentless aortic valves. Results: The mean patient age was 73.9 years, and the average STS-PROM score was 13.45%, reflecting a high-risk population. The most frequently treated prosthesis was the Medtronic Freestyle valve, and the predominant mechanism of failure was regurgitation. Transfemoral access represented the most common approach, while balloon-expandable and self-expanding transcatheter valves were used with similar frequency. Coronary protection strategies were adopted in a minority of procedures, whereas adjunctive procedural techniques such as pre- or post-dilation were relatively common. Device-related complications were mainly driven by coronary obstruction, while cardiac complications included myocardial infarction and unplanned coronary intervention. Overall, VARC-3 device success was achieved in the majority of procedures, with acceptable short-term mortality despite the complexity of the treated population. Conclusions: ViV TAVR in degenerated stentless bioprostheses appears feasible and generally effective but remains associated with specific procedural challenges, particularly related to coronary obstruction risk. Careful anatomical assessment and tailored procedural planning are essential, and larger contemporary studies are needed to better define optimal management strategies in this complex setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Cardiac Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3135 KB  
Review
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Pure Aortic Regurgitation
by Samuel Norman, Noman Ali and Daniel Blackman
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3206; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093206 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 321
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the management of severe aortic stenosis (AS), evolving from a therapy reserved for inoperable patients to a viable treatment across the spectrum of surgical risk. This success has stimulated innovation in transcatheter therapies for other valvular [...] Read more.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the management of severe aortic stenosis (AS), evolving from a therapy reserved for inoperable patients to a viable treatment across the spectrum of surgical risk. This success has stimulated innovation in transcatheter therapies for other valvular heart diseases, including aortic regurgitation (AR). In contrast to AS, AR is characterised by heterogeneous aetiologies, absence of annular calcification, larger and more elliptical annular dimensions, and concomitant aortopathy. These challenges have limited the efficacy and safety of conventional transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs), use of which in pure native AR is associated with high rates of valve embolisation, significant residual regurgitation, permanent pacemaker implantation, and mortality. The development of dedicated TAVs designed specifically for the treatment of AR has addressed many of these anatomical challenges. The JenaValve Trilogy and J-Valve systems incorporate leaflet-grasping mechanisms that enable secure anchoring independent of calcification, resulting in transformation of procedural and clinical outcomes. Recent prospective registry data, including the landmark ALIGN-AR trial, demonstrate high technical and procedural success rates, low residual regurgitation, acceptable safety profiles, and meaningful improvements in functional status and ventricular remodelling. These data have informed contemporary guideline updates, with the 2025 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery (EACTS) Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease issuing the first conditional recommendation for TAVI in selected patients with severe AR and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommending TAVI for native AR in patients for whom surgical AVR is not available or is high risk. This review summarises the clinical implications of AR, examines current guideline recommendations for management, and critically appraises the evidence supporting transcatheter treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Insights and Advances in Structural Heart Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2290 KB  
Article
Automated Annuloplasty with VirtuoSEW® in microInvasive Mitral Valve Repair (μMVr)
by Nermir Granov, Farhad Bakhtiary, Armin Šljivo and Jude S. Sauer
Med. Sci. 2026, 14(2), 187; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020187 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 489
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair reduces surgical trauma and accelerates recovery but can be technically challenging, particularly for precise annuloplasty suturing. The VirtuoSEW® (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY 14564m, USA) automated annular suturing system was developed to standardize and simplify suture [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair reduces surgical trauma and accelerates recovery but can be technically challenging, particularly for precise annuloplasty suturing. The VirtuoSEW® (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY 14564m, USA) automated annular suturing system was developed to standardize and simplify suture placement. This study was an early evaluation of this technology’s safety, efficacy, and feasibility in totally endoscopic microInvasive mitral valve repair (µMVr). Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of 20 patients with severe mitral valve disease of various etiologies. All patients underwent mitral valve repair using the VirtuoSEW® system for automated placement of annuloplasty sutures, combined with leaflet resection or chordal management as appropriate. Postoperative outcomes were assessed at one month using echocardiography and clinical evaluation. Perioperative and postoperative complications and early mortality were systematically recorded. Results: VirtuoSEW®-assisted mitral valve repair was safe and effective, achieving complete elimination of severe mitral regurgitation in all patients (N = 20, 100%). Annuloplasty rings included Physio-ring (N = 12, 60%), Memo 3D (N = 4, 20%), and Memo 4D (N = 4, 20%), combined with leaflet repair techniques: leaflet plication (N = 5, 25%), neochordae implantation (N = 7, 35%), sliding plasty (N = 2, 10%), commissural repair (N = 1, 5%), and hemibutterfly repair (N = 1, 5%). Concomitant procedures included: tricuspid valve repair (N = 1, 5%) and atrial septal defect closure (N = 1, 5%). Mitral annulus diameter decreased from 42.0 ± 5.3 mm to 34.2 ± 2.2 mm (p = 0.001). Mean total surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamp times were 170.3 ± 21.3, 143.4 ± 21.5, and 80.4 ± 7.9 min, respectively. ICU stay was 1.0 ± 0.2 days, with a hospital stay of 8.0 ± 1.9 days. No perioperative complications—including bleeding (N = 0, 0%), stroke (N = 0, 0%), infections (N = 0, 0%), or 30-day mortality (N = 0, 0%)—occurred. Conclusions: µMVR invasive mitral valve repair using the VirtuoSEW® system is safe, effective, and reproducible, as well as compatible with almost all repair techniques, providing complete restoration of valve competence with no early device-related complications. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study reporting outcomes with this device, supporting its potential to streamline mitral repair and improve procedural efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 731 KB  
Article
Unplanned Mechanical Circulatory Support as Hemodynamic Rescue Worsens Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
by Michael Keller, Ye In Christopher Kwon, Zachary Gertz, Barbara Lawson, Mohammed Quader and Zubair A. Hashmi
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(6), 2371; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062371 - 20 Mar 2026
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Acute hemodynamic collapse is a rare but deadly complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that can require temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). Using a statewide collaborative, we conducted a focused analysis on the incidence and outcomes associated with the use [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Acute hemodynamic collapse is a rare but deadly complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) that can require temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). Using a statewide collaborative, we conducted a focused analysis on the incidence and outcomes associated with the use of tMCS during TAVR as hemodynamic rescue. Methods: We identified adult patients who underwent TAVR between September 2012 and September 2024 within the statewide collaborative and stratified them based on if tMCS was needed. Baseline patient characteristics and risk factors associated with tMCS use were analyzed as well as the impact of tMCS on outcomes. Results: We identified 7735 patients who underwent TAVR. A total of 44 (0.57%) patients required tMCS. Patients requiring tMCS were more likely to have histories that included diabetes, concurrent mitral regurgitation, prior MI, or NYHA class III or IV. These patients also experienced more emergent procedures and were more likely to require inotropic support. Patients experienced significantly worse outcomes following tMCS rescue during TAVR, with 18% requiring conversion to surgical approach (vs. 1%, p < 0.001) and 37% of tMCS patients experiencing cardiac arrest, compared to 1% of those who did not need tMCS (p < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was worse for patients requiring tMCS (p < 0.001). MCS usage was independently associated with the need for further procedures. Conclusions: Unplanned, emergent tMCS during TAVR as hemodynamic rescue represents significant risk of complications and should be utilized judiciously in cases of acute hemodynamic collapse. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heart Valve Surgery: Recent Trends and Future Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 363 KB  
Article
Progressive Aortic Regurgitation After Impella Bridge-to-LVAD: A Two-Year Cohort Analysis
by Attila Nemeth, Aron Frederik Popov, Rodrigo Sandoval Boburg, Spiros Lukas Marinos, Helene Häberle, Christoph Salewski, Volker Steger, Christian Schlensak and Medhat Radwan
Biomedicines 2026, 14(3), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14030715 - 19 Mar 2026
Viewed by 604
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Impella support is increasingly utilized as a crucial bridge to durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, the transvalvular path of the Impella catheter raises concerns regarding mechanical trauma, potentially precipitating or accelerating aortic regurgitation [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Impella support is increasingly utilized as a crucial bridge to durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, the transvalvular path of the Impella catheter raises concerns regarding mechanical trauma, potentially precipitating or accelerating aortic regurgitation (AR). We aimed to characterize the complete longitudinal trajectory of AR following Impella bridge-to-LVAD and to determine its association with clinical and hemodynamic sequelae. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including all patients bridged from Impella to durable LVAD between 2013 and 2024 (n = 19). At Impella initiation, all patients met the retrospective SCAI shock stage D or worse criteria. At LVAD implantation, all patients were classified as INTERMACS 1–2 (INTERMACS 2, n = 13). The Impella models were 5.0 in 11 (axillary access), 2.5 in 5 (femoral access), and CP in 3 (femoral access); no periprocedural Impella complications were recorded. The implanted LVAD systems were HeartMate II (n = 7), HVAD (n = 3), and HeartMate III (n = 9). Patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve intervention were excluded. Transthoracic/TEE echocardiography was performed at prespecified time points (pre-Impella, pre-LVAD, post-LVAD discharge, 12 months, and 24 months) with standardized aortic regurgitation (AR) grading. Right ventricular (RV) function was assessed qualitatively when quantitative indices (TAPSE) were unavailable. Primary endpoints were new or progressive AR and AR severity at LVAD implantation. Secondary endpoints included survival, renal dysfunction, biomarkers, and rehospitalization. Univariate analyses were used to compare outcomes according to AR severity. Results: Nineteen patients (68% male, median age 57 years, IQR 47–60) underwent Impella support for 13.3 ± 9.9 days before HeartMate 3 (84%) or HVAD (16%) implantation. All patients had competent aortic valves (grade 0 AR) at the time of LVAD implantation. AR ≥ mild developed in 9/18 (50%) at discharge, 12/15 (80%) at 12 months, and 13/15 (87%) at 24 months, and 8/15 (53%) progressed to ≥ moderate AR by 24 months. Patients with moderate-to-severe AR had higher NT-proBNP levels at 12 months (median 6318 vs. 2336 pg/mL, p = 0.137). Thirty-day and 24-month survival rates were 95% and 79%, respectively. Conclusions: Aortic regurgitation frequently develops or progresses from the pre-LVAD period to follow-up in patients bridged from Impella to durable LVAD. Although limited by a small sample size and incomplete quantitative RV metrics, these observations support structured echocardiographic surveillance after Impella use and management strategies—routine valve inspection at LVAD implantation and post-LVAD speed/blood pressure targets that encourage aortic valve opening—to mitigate the risk and clinical impact of aortic regurgitation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 422 KB  
Case Report
Surgical Management of Subvalvular Aortic Stenosis in Adults: A Case Series of Two Patients
by Athanasios Papatriantafyllou, Vasileios Leivaditis, Antonella Koutela, Francesk Mulita, Spyros Papadoulas, Efstratios Koletsis and Nikolaos G. Baikoussis
Reports 2026, 9(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports9010088 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 402
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Subvalvular aortic stenosis (SAS) is the second most common form of aortic stenosis after valvular disease and predominantly affects male patients. It is frequently associated with other congenital cardiac anomalies, such as ventricular septal defect, and is rarely diagnosed [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Subvalvular aortic stenosis (SAS) is the second most common form of aortic stenosis after valvular disease and predominantly affects male patients. It is frequently associated with other congenital cardiac anomalies, such as ventricular septal defect, and is rarely diagnosed during infancy. Instead, SAS typically manifests during childhood or adulthood as a progressive left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, leading to left ventricular hypertrophy and, in many cases, aortic regurgitation. Case Presentation: The first patient was a 61-year-old man presenting with progressive dyspnea, in whom echocardiography revealed severe subaortic stenosis and computed tomography demonstrated aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta. Intraoperatively, the aortic valve was found to be dystrophic with mixed stenotic and regurgitant disease; therefore, subaortic membrane resection, mechanical aortic valve replacement, and ascending aortic replacement with a synthetic graft were performed. The second patient was a 31-year-old man with exertional dyspnea and a discrete subaortic membrane associated with mild ascending aortic dilatation. Surgical treatment consisted of complete membrane resection and aortic valve repair, while the ascending aorta was preserved. Both patients had an uneventful postoperative course and were discharged on the fourth postoperative day. At 3-month follow-up, both were asymptomatic, in normal sinus rhythm, and demonstrated satisfactory echocardiographic findings without residual left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Conclusions: Surgical intervention remains the definitive treatment for subvalvular aortic stenosis when clinically indicated. Concomitant cardiac or aortic pathology should be addressed during the same procedure to optimize outcomes. When performed with meticulous technique and appropriate patient selection, surgical correction is associated with excellent early recovery and favorable mid-term results, although long-term follow-up remains essential due to the risk of recurrence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 969 KB  
Article
Prognostic Impact of Untreated Chronic Coronary Artery Obstruction After Surgery for Aortic Regurgitation
by Xin Li, Vito Domenico Bruno, Yi Jiang, Yunxing Xue and Dongjin Wang
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2026, 13(3), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13030115 - 3 Mar 2026
Viewed by 441
Abstract
Background: The optimal management strategy for 50–70% chronic coronary artery stenosis in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery for aortic regurgitation (AR) remains controversial. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of chronic coronary obstruction severity on surgical outcomes and mid-term survival. Methods: This retrospective [...] Read more.
Background: The optimal management strategy for 50–70% chronic coronary artery stenosis in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery for aortic regurgitation (AR) remains controversial. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of chronic coronary obstruction severity on surgical outcomes and mid-term survival. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 717 patients undergoing aortic valve surgery for AR, grouped by coronary stenosis into <50% (n = 641) and 50–70% (n = 76). Following 1:1 propensity score matching (72 patients per group), the primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the secondary outcome of all-cause death were compared. Results: No intergroup differences emerged in perioperative mortality (1.32% vs. 1.56%, p = 1.000) or complication rate. With a median follow-up of 2.53 years, 50–70% coronary obstruction does not increase MACE (HR = 2.050; 95% CI 0.375–11.197; log-rank p = 0.397) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.710; 95% CI 0.200–2.522; log-rank p = 0.595). Similar results were obtained in the competing risk regression and multivariable analyses. Conclusions: In patients with AR, 50–70% chronic coronary obstruction does not increase perioperative complications, MACE, and all-cause mortality. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 1333 KB  
Review
Lifetime Management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Guide to Decision-Making and Future Reinterventions
by Malanka Lankaputhra, Dion Stub, Riley J. Batchelor, Vishal Goel and Nay Min Htun
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1917; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051917 - 3 Mar 2026
Viewed by 893
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, evolving from a therapy reserved for inoperable patients to a first-line option across all surgical risk categories. As TAVR expands to younger patients with longer life expectancies, lifetime management strategies [...] Read more.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, evolving from a therapy reserved for inoperable patients to a first-line option across all surgical risk categories. As TAVR expands to younger patients with longer life expectancies, lifetime management strategies become paramount. This comprehensive review examines the important role of computed tomography (CT) planning in optimizing initial valve selection and predicting future reintervention feasibility. We discuss the decision framework between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as initial therapy, strategies to optimize the index TAVR procedure, including minimizing patient-prosthesis mismatch, reducing paravalvular regurgitation, preventing conduction abnormalities and coronary obstruction, and facilitating future reinterventions. For patients requiring redo procedures, we analyse TAVR-in-TAVR considerations, including risk plane assessment, coronary access preservation, and leaflet modification techniques. Future directions include advances in valve design, artificial intelligence integration in procedural planning, and development of personalized risk assessment tools. Successful lifetime management requires multidisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to optimize outcomes throughout a patient’s lifetime journey with aortic valve disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Perspectives in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 5181 KB  
Article
Comparison of Hemodynamics After Fenestrated, Branched, and Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Employing Computational Fluid Dynamics
by Stavros Malatos, Spyridon Katsoudas, Anastasios Raptis, Laura Fazzini, Petroula Nana, George Kouvelos, Athanasios Giannoukas, Michalis Xenos and Miltiadis Matsagkas
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1914; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051914 - 3 Mar 2026
Viewed by 428
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study compared the hemodynamic performance of fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), and chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (chEVAR) in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. Methods: The pre- (native) and post-endovascular repair (endograft-defined) blood lumen was reconstructed from computed tomography angiographies of nine [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study compared the hemodynamic performance of fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), and chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (chEVAR) in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. Methods: The pre- (native) and post-endovascular repair (endograft-defined) blood lumen was reconstructed from computed tomography angiographies of nine (9) elective patients treated with FEVAR (n = 3), BEVAR (n = 3), and chEVAR (n = 3). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations obtained blood flow properties. Velocity magnitude, wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and local normalized helicity (LNH) were computed at peak systole and mid-diastole. The hemodynamic data were statistically analyzed to evaluate correlations between FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR, focusing on targeted visceral arteries. Results: Only slight differences were observed regarding RRT, OSI, and TAWSS between FEVAR and BEVAR, whereas the chEVAR group demonstrated a marked deviation from both. In FEVAR, the postoperative helical flow structures appeared more compact, while in BEVAR they were more developed and exhibited a more rotational configuration. The LNH of the visceral vessel patterns exhibited similar qualitative features across groups. Regarding TAWSS, higher values were found in BEVAR, whereas chEVAR showed the lowest. Conclusions: FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR improved postoperative blood flow characteristics toward near-physiological conditions, reducing undesired flow patterns and recirculation zones. FEVAR showed more stable visceral flow, and BEVAR demonstrated higher flow rates and fewer recirculation zones, while chEVAR exhibited more streamlined visceral artery flow with reduced regurgitation at bridging stent entries. Despite variations, all approaches effectively preserved visceral artery perfusion. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 505 KB  
Article
Transcatheter Versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Single-Center Cohort Study
by Nikoleta Stanitsa, Emmanouel Tempelis, Ilias Samiotis, Dimitris Oikonomou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, George Lazopoulos, Periklis Tomos and Panagiotis Dedeilias
Medicina 2026, 62(3), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030476 - 3 Mar 2026
Viewed by 583
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Over the past decade, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has evolved from a treatment for inoperable patients to an established option across all risk categories. In parallel, the Perceval sutureless valve has demonstrated safety and efficacy especially for minimally [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Over the past decade, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has evolved from a treatment for inoperable patients to an established option across all risk categories. In parallel, the Perceval sutureless valve has demonstrated safety and efficacy especially for minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Despite the advances of both TAVI and Perceval, robust long-term data and clear patient selection criteria are still lacking. This retrospective single-center study reports the outcomes of patients undergoing isolated AVR with the Perceval sutureless valve or with TAVI. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing isolated AVR at our institution between April 2013 and December 2024. Of 1006 eligible patients (424 TAVI; 582 Perceval), propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, EuroSCORE II, body surface area, and comorbidities, yielding 197 matched pairs. Primary endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary endpoints included acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, pericardial effusion, ICU stay, and overall hospital stay. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was obtained by medical-record review and routine echocardiography, with an additional prospective clinical and echocardiographic evaluation at 6–12 months. Results: Postprocedural paravalvular leak was significantly more frequent after TAVI than after Perceval AVR (23.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001). At 6–12 months, TAVI was associated with greater aortic regurgitation and higher rates of para- and intra-prosthetic leak (both p < 0.001) and higher mean transvalvular gradients, particularly in small and medium valve sizes. ICU and overall hospital stay were longer after Perceval implantation (both p < 0.001). New permanent pacemaker implantation was numerically higher after TAVI (11.2% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.063). Early mortality was similar; however, 1-year mortality was higher after TAVI (16.2% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.045), and Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated better overall survival with Perceval (p < 0.001), while cardiovascular survival did not differ significantly (p = 0.851). Conclusions: Our study underscores the importance of meticulous patient selection when choosing between TAVI and Perceval. Perceval implantation was associated with better long-term overall survival than TAVI in the propensity-matched cohort. Paravalvular leaks were more frequent after TAVI and associated with poorer survival. Both approaches achieve excellent outcomes; however, differences in long-term survival and valve performance highlight the need for a personalized treatment strategy guided by a multidisciplinary heart team. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 335 KB  
Article
Electronic Stethoscope Auscultation and Echocardiography in ARDS: Correlation and Prognostic Value for Mortality and ICU Length of Stay: A Prospective Observational Study
by Ioannis Alevroudis, Serafeim-Chrysovalantis Kotoulas, Christina Mouratidou, Aliki Karkala, Anastasia Michailidou, Myrto Tzimou, Spyridon Synodinos-Kamilos, Chrysavgi Giannaki, Christos Karachristos, Athina Lavrentieva, Nicos Maglaveras and Evangelos Kaimakamis
Medicina 2026, 62(3), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62030470 - 1 Mar 2026
Viewed by 559
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) carries high mortality, with cardiovascular complications frequently contributing to adverse outcomes. This study investigated the relationship between cardiac auscultation using electronic stethoscopy and echocardiographic findings and evaluated their prognostic significance in mechanically ventilated ARDS [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) carries high mortality, with cardiovascular complications frequently contributing to adverse outcomes. This study investigated the relationship between cardiac auscultation using electronic stethoscopy and echocardiographic findings and evaluated their prognostic significance in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 173 consecutive adults with ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation (June 2020–June 2021). Cardiac auscultation was performed using an electronic stethoscope at four standard valvular positions. Bedside echocardiography assessed ventricular function, valvular regurgitation, right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), and inferior vena cava dimensions. Primary outcomes were ICU and 90-day mortality; the secondary outcome was ICU length of stay. Results: ICU mortality was 42.2% and 90-day mortality 46.8%. Auscultation findings correlated significantly with echocardiographic parameters: aortic stenosis murmur with an elevated aortic valve velocity (p = 0.009), and mitral/tricuspid regurgitation murmurs with corresponding color Doppler findings (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the mean daily SOFA score (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.57–3.64, p < 0.001) and RVSP (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.11, p = 0.006) independently predicted ICU mortality. For 90-day mortality, the APACHE II score (OR 1.25, p = 0.006), mean daily SOFA score (OR 1.54, p = 0.039), RVSP (OR 1.07, p = 0.020), and mitral regurgitation severity (OR 2.98, p = 0.031) were independent predictors. ICU length of stay was predicted by the mean daily SOFA score (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and tricuspid regurgitation severity (r = 0.25, p = 0.012). Conclusions: Electronic stethoscope auscultation correlates with the echocardiographic findings in ARDS patients. The RVSP and SOFA scores independently predict mortality, while valvular regurgitation severity provides additional prognostic information for long-term survival and ICU resource utilization. Full article
11 pages, 610 KB  
Article
Outcomes of Heart Transplantation in Single-Ventricle Physiology: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience with Emphasis on Surgical Complexity
by Szymon Pawlak, Joanna Śliwka, Roman Przybylski, Agnieszka Kuczaj, Małgorzata Szkutnik, Piotr Przybyłowski and Tomasz Hrapkowicz
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1714; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051714 - 24 Feb 2026
Viewed by 653
Abstract
Background: Patients with single-ventricle physiology represent a high-risk group for heart transplantation. Due to complex anatomical and physiological challenges, including multiple prior sternotomies, pulmonary artery abnormalities, and systemic consequences of altered circulation, they represent both a surgical and a clinical challenge. We aimed [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with single-ventricle physiology represent a high-risk group for heart transplantation. Due to complex anatomical and physiological challenges, including multiple prior sternotomies, pulmonary artery abnormalities, and systemic consequences of altered circulation, they represent both a surgical and a clinical challenge. We aimed to analyze perioperative challenges, as well as early and long-term complications, in this specific group of patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective data analysis of a high-volume heart transplant center, focusing on patients with single-ventricle physiology who were scheduled for heart transplantation due to end-stage heart failure. We retrospectively analyzed the period from the beginning of the transplant program in November 1985 to the end of November 2024. Results: Among 1553 transplanted patients (adults and children), 29 were transplanted due to congenital heart disease (congenital valvular disease not included). In this group, nine patients were transplanted due to end-stage heart failure in the course of single-ventricle physiology. Age at transplantation ranged from 7 to 31 years (median, 17 years), and body weight ranged from 15 to 69 kg (median, 47.9 kg). All nine patients referred for heart transplantation presented with single-ventricle physiology. Their underlying congenital heart defects were heterogeneous and included hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), double-outlet left ventricle (DOLV), transposition of the great arteries (TGA) with associated ventricular septal defects (VSDs), atrial septal defects (ASDs), valvular abnormalities such as tricuspid and or pulmonary valve atresia or stenosis, systemic or atrioventricular valve regurgitation, and vascular abnormalities, including right-sided aortic arch, aortic coarctation, and pulmonary artery hypoplasia, stenosis, or occlusion, as well as associated pulmonary vascular abnormalities such as left pulmonary artery stenosis and MAPCAs. All patients had previously undergone staged palliative procedures, including Norwood, Hemi-Fontan, Fontan, bidirectional Glenn, modified Blalock–Taussig shunts, Bjork–Fontan, or pulmonary artery banding, often with repeated interventions such as balloon angioplasty, stent placement, or MAPCA closure. Extracardiac comorbidities were common and included coagulopathies, protein-losing enteropathy, hepatic dysfunction, and chronic venous insufficiency. Preoperative functional status was markedly impaired in all patients (NYHA III-IV, INTERMACS 3-4), with severely reduced exercise capacity and thrombotic events in several individuals. Perioperative transplant surgical strategies included femoral cannulation in four cases and standard aortic and caval cannulation in five cases. Pulmonary artery reconstruction was required in all patients. Extended donor pulmonary arteries were applied in eight cases, while a bifurcated Dacron prosthesis was utilized in one patient. Perioperative mortality was 33%, with three deaths attributed to bleeding and hemodynamic instability, while overall mortality was 44% including one late death unrelated to transplantation. Protein-losing enteropathy, although persistent in the immediate postoperative period, resolved in all surviving patients, underscoring the transformative impact of transplantation. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the importance of individualized surgical planning, extended donor pulmonary artery harvesting, and careful preoperative coordination. Heart transplantation remains a viable and life-extending option for selected single-ventricle patients, despite the significant technical and clinical challenges involved. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 955 KB  
Article
Structural and Non-Structural Deterioration After Biological Aortic Valve Replacement: Long-Term Outcomes of 918 High-Risk Patients
by Jan Hlavička, Julian Landgraf, Andreas Winter, Mascha von Zeppelin, Yasemin Ilgin, Razan Salem, Florian Hecker, Thomas Walther and Tomas Holubec
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2026, 13(2), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13020087 - 11 Feb 2026
Viewed by 871
Abstract
Introduction: The global disease burden of aortic valve disease is already substantial and is projected to rise significantly in the coming decades. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a biological prosthesis has become highly popular and commonly used. This study aims to assess long-term [...] Read more.
Introduction: The global disease burden of aortic valve disease is already substantial and is projected to rise significantly in the coming decades. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a biological prosthesis has become highly popular and commonly used. This study aims to assess long-term outcomes after biological AVR with regard to structural and non-structural deterioration. Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, 918 patients undergoing surgical AVR with a biological prosthesis at the University Hospital Frankfurt from January 2006 to July 2009 were included. The primary endpoints were freedom from reoperation and from structural and non-structural deterioration, and the secondary was long-term survival. Follow-up was completed in 95.6% with a median of 7.6 years, accounting 6610 patient-years. The mean age was 74.9 years and a median EuroSCORE II (range) was 3.34 (0.77–62.4). Twenty-two percent of surgeries were either emergent or urgent. Many patients had concomitant surgery, while coronary artery bypass grafting in 45.3% of patients was the most common. Three prosthetic valve models were used in our patient population: Carpentier Edwards Perimount (CEP) Model 2900, Model 3000 and Medtronic Mosaic (MM). Results: Reoperation occurred in 36 patients (3.9%) due to endocarditis (2.0%), aortic root aneurysm (0.1%), isolated or combined aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation (1.9%). Freedom from reoperation at 5, 10 and 15 years was 97 ± 0.6%, 95.6 ± 0.8% and 90.3 ± 2.3%, respectively. Freedom from major stroke at 5, 10 and 15 years was 97.9 ± 0.0%, 96.4 ± 0.8%, and 96.1 ± 0.08%, and freedom from major bleeding event at 5, 10 and 15 years was 98.5 ± 0.4%, 95.7 ± 0.9% and 92.7 ± 2.2%, respectively. A subgroup analysis of the Carpentier Edwards (CEP) valves and the Medtronic Mosaic (MM) valves showed no significant differences regarding the primary endpoints. The overall survival at 5, 10 and 15 years was 67 ± 1.7%, 39.8 ± 1.8%, and 15.1 ± 2.2% respectively. The Kaplan–Meier survival estimator was 96 ± 2.2 months. Conclusion: This study showed a good long-term survival of surgical AVR with biological prostheses in relatively high-risk and elderly patient population. All biological prosthetic valves showed good long-term durability with low levels of complications and reoperations. The different models did not show any significant differences. Surgical AVR remains a valuable therapeutic option even though transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been greatly expanded since its introduction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop