Search Results (65)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has long constituted a cornerstone of post-remission consolidation therapy for adults with high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), offering potent graft-versus-leukemia activity at the expense of significant treatment-related toxicity (TRT) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Over the past two decades, however, outcomes following allo-HSCT have improved substantially. This progress has been driven primarily by a marked reduction in NRM, translating into improved overall survival (OS), as consistently documented by large cooperative group analyses and single-center series. Advances in supportive care, infectious prophylaxis, donor selection, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prevention have contributed substantially to this improvement. In parallel, transplant decision-making has been profoundly reshaped by refined disease biology-based risk stratification and the systematic evaluation of measurable residual disease (MRD). Moreover, the advent of highly effective immunotherapeutic approaches—including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies—has enabled the achievement of deeper molecular remissions prior to transplantation, both in first and subsequent complete remissions. Taken together, these developments have shifted allo-HSCT from a widely applied strategy to a more individualized, risk-adapted therapeutic approach. This review examines how the indications, timing, and objectives of allo-HSCT are evolving in the contemporary treatment landscape of adult B-ALL, with particular emphasis on Philadelphia chromosome–negative, Philadelphia-like, and Philadelphia chromosome–positive disease subsets. Full article

Background: T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (TCEs) have transformed haematological malignancy treatment (blinatumomab > 40% complete remission), yet solid tumour efficacy remains limited (<15% response rates) due to antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive microenvironments, and T-cell dysfunction. Systematic molecular engineering, biomarker-driven patient selection, and rational tumour microenvironment modulation are now collectively transforming TCEs from experimental agents into an adaptable platform therapy for solid tumours. Methods: Review of 55 phase I–III trials of CD3-based TCEs in solid tumours, including tarlatamab (DLL3-targeted, small-cell lung cancer) and xaluritamig (STEAP1-targeted, prostate cancer). Analysis of next-generation engineering strategies and resistance mechanisms via genomic and immunohistochemical data. Result: Response rates now approach ~40% in selected settings, marking an inflection point. In extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, tarlatamab achieved ~40% responses with definitive survival benefit (phase III HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47–0.77; p < 0.001; median OS 13.6 months). In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, xaluritamig produced ~41% responses in heavily pretreated patients. Step-up dosing reduced severe cytokine release syndrome to <1% (as low as 0.6% with teclistamab), enabling outpatient administration. Neurological adverse events require monitoring but are less frequent than with cellular therapies. Together these results mark a decisive transition from proof-of-concept to clinically validated platform therapy. Discussion: Three resistance mechanisms limit durability: (i) antigen heterogeneity (28–60% of progressors develop antigen-negative subclones); (ii) immunosuppressive microenvironments (stromal barriers, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, hypoxia); (iii) T-cell exhaustion (PD-1/TIM-3/LAG-3 co-expression). Conclusions: Next-generation TCE platforms integrating conditional activation, cytokine payloads, and checkpoint modulation—deployed with biomarker-guided selection and TME-modulating combinations—represent a transformative therapeutic strategy. With tarlatamab’s phase III survival benefit establishing clinical proof-of-concept, and pivotal trials underway for xaluritamig and next-generation agents, TCEs are positioned to become standard-of-care platform therapies in biomarker-defined solid tumours by 2028–2030. Full article

KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), particularly in infants, represents one of the most aggressive pediatric hematological malignancies with a historically dismal prognosis. While KMT2A-AFF1 (t(4;11)) is the most prevalent fusion, a diverse array of partner genes exists, each conferring distinct biological and clinical features. This review focuses on the rare but clinically significant KMT2A-AFF3 subtype, which arises from the t(2;11)(q11.2;q23) chromosomal translocation. This review summarizes the molecular pathogenesis driven by the KMT2A-AFF3 fusion oncoprotein, which functions as an aberrant transcriptional complex. This complex hijacks essential epigenetic machinery, including the recruitment of DOT1L and interaction with Menin, leading to pathogenic histone modifications (e.g., H3K79 hypermethylation) and the subsequent upregulation of critical target genes, notably the HOXA cluster and MEIS1, thereby enforcing a B-lymphoid differentiation arrest at the pro-B/pre-B stage. Clinically, KMT2A-AFF3 ALL is characterized by high-risk features, including infant onset, hyperleukocytosis, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, and a distinct CD10-negative immunophenotype. This review highlights the evidence defining its poor prognosis, which is primarily driven by profound chemoresistance to conventional therapies, including glucocorticoids. Finally, we discuss the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, detailing the limitations of standard intensive chemotherapy and the immense promise of novel targeted strategies, such as Menin inhibitors (e.g., Revumenib), DOT1L inhibitors, and immunotherapies (e.g., CAR-T cells, Blinatumomab), which hold the potential to revolutionize outcomes for this high-risk leukemia subtype. Full article

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric malignancy, characterized by the clonal proliferation of immature lymphoid precursors. The distinction between B-cell ALL (B-ALL) and T-cell ALL (T-ALL) is fundamental, as each subtype exhibits distinct cytomorphological, genetic, and clinical features influencing prognosis and therapeutic strategies. Conventional multi-phase chemotherapy has significantly improved survival rates, yet its efficacy is limited by severe short- and long-term toxicities, highlighting the need for more selective therapeutic approaches. Advances in molecular profiling have enabled the identification of key oncogenic pathways, paving the way for targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors, BCL-2 antagonists, and agents modulating epigenetic and cell cycle regulators. Concurrently, immunotherapeutic strategies have transformed the therapeutic landscape of pediatric ALL. Bispecific antibodies such as blinatumomab (anti-CD19), antibody–drug conjugates like inotuzumab ozogamicin (anti-CD22), and monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab (anti-CD38) have demonstrated efficacy in relapsed or refractory disease with improved safety profiles. Moreover, CAR-T-cell therapy, particularly CD19-directed products, has shown unprecedented remission rates in refractory B-ALL. The integration of targeted and immune-based therapies into conventional regimens represents a decisive step toward precision medicine, aiming to enhance survival outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity and improving quality of life in ALL children. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of ALL pathobiology and therapeutic approaches, with particular emphasis on the expanding role of immunotherapeutic strategies in pediatric disease. Full article

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are an important medical innovation in modern medicine. They are an effective therapy for several subtypes of leukaemia but may have undesirable effects, which may be minimised through the provision of interdisciplinary care including a pharmacist. The goals of this narrative review were twofold: first, to summarise the literature on the side effects of mAbs and the challenges of their preparation, and to provide recommendations for the safe preparation of mAb drug formulations for clinicians. Second, to suggest clinical roles for pharmacists to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes for leukaemia patients receiving mAb therapy. The review covers data from 178 scientific and official sources of information on the types of targeted immunobiological drugs for the treatment of various types of leukaemia. The results are a detailed description of the possible side effects from mAb therapy and a list of suggested actions that can be taken to prevent them. Pharmaceutical aspects of the use of mAbs, such as pharmacoeconomics, compounding and stability, are also discussed. The discussion is organised according to the current classification of leukaemia. The drugs considered include blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, rituximab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, and alemtuzumab. The review offers a comprehensive resource to equip pharmacists and other clinicians to optimise mAb therapy and promote the safe use of these novel therapies. Full article

The therapeutic landscape of adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is undergoing a paradigm shift, driven by the development of immunotherapy-based “chemo-free” and “chemo-light’ regimens. These strategies aim to achieve high efficacy with reduced toxicity, particularly in older adults who may not tolerate intensive chemotherapy. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) BCP-ALL, the incorporation of ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with blinatumomab (CD3/CD19 bispecific T-cell engager) has shown remarkable efficacy, with some studies reporting molecular response rates in the range of 90–100% and long-term survival exceeding 80% without the need for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In Philadelphia-negative (Ph−) BCP- ALL, an immunotherapy-based combination of blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate) has demonstrated high rates of complete remission and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity, with manageable toxicity. While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy remains a transformative option for relapsed/refractory B-ALL, its integration into frontline treatment is still under investigation. Ongoing trials are evaluating the optimal sequencing and combinations of these agents and their potential to obviate the need for chemotherapy and/or allo-HCT in selected patients. As evidence continues to accumulate, chemo-free and chemo-light regimens, incorporating minimal chemotherapy with targeted agents to balance efficacy and reduced toxicity, are poised to redefine the standard of care for adults BCP-ALL, offering the possibility of durable remissions with reduced treatment-related morbidity. Full article

T-cell-engaging antibodies are a promising new type of treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, which has changed the prognosis and evolution of these patients in clinical trials. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) bind to two different targets (B and T lymphocytes) at the same time and in this way mimic the action of CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T-cells. They are the T-cell-engaging antibodies most used in practice and are a solution for patients who do not respond to second- or later-line therapies, including chemoimmunotherapy, followed by salvage chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. They are a therapeutic option for patients who are ineligible for CAR T-cell therapy and are also active in those with prior exposure to CAR T-cell treatment. A remarkable advantage of BsAbs is their rapid availability, even if the disease progresses rapidly, unlike CAR T-cell treatment, and they avoid the practical and financial challenges raised by autologous CAR T-cell therapies. CAR-T has been proven to have better efficacy compared to BsAbs, but cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have appeared significantly more frequently in patients treated with CAR T-cells. The possibility of combining BsAbs with chemotherapy and their administration for relapses or as a frontline therapy is being studied to increase their efficacy. BsAbs are a life-saving therapy for many patients with diffuse large B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who have a poor prognosis with classical therapies, but are not without adverse effects and require careful monitoring. Full article

Over the past two decades, the treatment landscape of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) has undergone a profound transformation. Once considered the subtype with the worst prognosis, Ph+ ALL is now associated with the possibility of long-term survival in a significant proportion of patients. This dramatic improvement has been driven by the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and, more recently, by the incorporation of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager antibody, into frontline therapeutic strategies. In this evolving context, two major areas have become the focus of clinical investigation: on the one hand, the identification of high-risk patients who truly benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT); on the other, the characterization of patients who can achieve durable responses without transplantation and who may be candidates for treatment discontinuation of TKIs. This review aims to summarize the current evidence supporting the concept of treatment-free remission (TFR) in Ph+ ALL. Full article

Background/Objectives: The physiological activation of cytotoxic CD8^pos T cells (CTLs) relies on the engagement of the TCR/CD3 complex with cognate peptide-HLA class I (pHLA-I) on target cells, triggering cell lysis with appropriate cytokine release and minimized off-target toxicity. In contrast, current immunotherapies for CD19-expressing hematological malignancies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs), bypass TCR/pHLA interactions, resulting in CTL hyperactivation and excessive cytokine release, which frequently cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, there is a pressing need for T cell-based therapies that preserve physiological activation while maintaining antitumor efficacy. Methods: To address this, we developed CD19-ReTARG^TPR, a novel fusion protein consisting of the immunodominant cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65-derived peptide TPRVTGGAM (TPR) covalently presented by a soluble HLA-B*07:02/β2-microglobulin complex fused to a high-affinity CD19-targeting Fab antibody fragment. The treatment of CD19-expressing cancer cells with CD19-ReTARG^TPR makes them recognizable for pre-existing anti-CMV_pp65 CTLs via physiological TCR-pHLA engagement. Results: Our preclinical data demonstrate that CD19-ReTARG^TPR efficiently redirects anti-CMV CTLs to eliminate CD19-expressing cancer cells, including both established cell lines and primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. Unlike CD19-directed CAR T cells or the CD19/CD3 BiTE blinatumomab, CD19-ReTARG^TPR mediated robust cytotoxic activity without triggering supraphysiological cytokine release. Importantly, this approach retained efficacy even against cancer cells with low CD19 expression. Conclusions: In summary, we provide a robust proof-of-concept study and show that CD19-ReTARG^TPR offers a promising alternative strategy for T cell redirection, enabling the selective and effective killing of CD19-expressing malignancies while minimizing cytokine-driven toxicities through physiological CTL activation pathways. Full article

Cancer continues to be a leading cause of global mortality, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies to address its complexity and heterogeneity. Protein engineering has emerged as a transformative approach in developing cancer biotherapeutics, enabling the creation of highly specific, potent, and adaptable treatments. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in protein engineering, highlighting key techniques such as directed evolution, rational design, and hybrid approaches that underpin the development of monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and novel fusion proteins. Case studies of FDA-approved therapies, including engineered monoclonal antibodies like trastuzumab and bispecific T-cell engagers such as blinatumomab, are discussed to illustrate the impact of these advancements. Furthermore, emerging trends, including AI-driven protein design and synthetic biology applications, are explored alongside their potential to revolutionize future cancer treatments. Challenges such as immunogenicity, stability, and scalability are critically evaluated, offering insights into potential solutions and future research directions. By synthesizing advancements in protein science and oncology, this paper aims to guide researchers and clinicians in harnessing the full potential of engineered proteins for cancer therapy. Full article

Since the advent of recombinant DNA technologies and leading up to the clinical approval of T cell engager blinatumomab, the modular design of therapeutic antibodies has enabled the fusion of antibody fragments with proteins of various functionalities. This has resulted in an expansive array of possible mechanisms of action and has given birth to fragment-based antibodies (fbAbs) with immune cell engager modalities. In searchable databases, the preclinical development of these antibodies has shown promise; however, clinical outcomes and restructuring efforts involving these agents have produced mixed results and uncertainties. Amid budgetary cuts in both academia and industry, critical planning and evaluation of drug R&D would be more essential than ever before. While many reviews have provided outstanding summaries of preclinical phase fbAbs and cataloged relevant clinical trials, to date, very few of the articles in searchable databases have comprehensively reviewed the details of clinical outcomes along with the underlying reasons or potential explanations for the success and failures of these fbAb drug products. To fill the gap, in this review, we seek to provide the readers with clinically driven insights, accompanied by translational and mechanistic studies, on the current landscape of fragment-based immune cell engager antibodies in treating cancer, infectious, and autoimmune diseases. Full article

Multispecific antibodies have redefined the immunotherapeutic landscape in hematologic malignancies. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), which redirect cytotoxic T cells toward malignant targets via dual antigen engagement, are now established components of treatment for diseases such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical trials of agents like blinatumomab, glofitamab, mosunetuzumab, and teclistamab have demonstrated deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated populations. Trispecific antibodies (TsAbs), although still investigational, represent the next generation of immune redirection therapies, incorporating additional tumor antigens or co-stimulatory domains (e.g., CD28, 4-1BB) to mitigate antigen escape and enhance T-cell persistence. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of BsAbs and TsAbs across hematologic malignancies, detailing molecular designs, mechanisms of action, therapeutic indications, resistance pathways, and toxicity profiles including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, and infections. We further discuss strategies to mitigate adverse effects and resistance, such as antigen switching, checkpoint blockade combinations, CELMoDs, and construct optimization. Notably, emerging platforms such as tetrafunctional constructs, checkpoint-integrated multispecifics, and protease-cleavable masking designs are expanding the therapeutic index of these agents. Early clinical evidence also supports the feasibility of applying multispecific antibodies to solid tumors. Finally, we highlight the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in multispecific antibody development, including antigen discovery, biomarker-driven treatment selection, toxicity prediction, and therapeutic optimization. Together, BsAbs and TsAbs illustrate the convergence of molecular precision, clinical innovation, and AI-driven personalization, establishing a new paradigm for immune-based therapy across hematologic and potentially solid tumor malignancies. Full article

Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), has shown substantial efficacy in treating both relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). With its targeted mechanism of action, favorable safety profile, and ability to induce deep molecular remissions, blinatumomab is increasingly incorporated into frontline treatment regimens for B-ALL. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved its use in the frontline setting for Ph-negative ALL. In Ph-negative ALL, combining blinatumomab with intensive chemotherapy has resulted in superior measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance and improved long-term outcomes. In Ph-positive ALL, combination therapies involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), particularly ponatinib and blinatumomab, are challenging the traditional approach of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). This review explores the current evidence supporting the frontline use of blinatumomab in newly diagnosed adults with B-ALL, its impact on treatment paradigms, and potential future directions, including novel combination therapies and the role of emerging immunotherapeutic approaches. Full article

Despite notable progress in managing B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) over recent decades, particularly in pediatric cohorts where the 5-year overall survival (OS) reaches 90%, outcomes for the 10–15% with relapsed and refractory disease remain unfavorable. This disparity is further accentuated in adults, where individuals over the age of 40 years undergoing aggressive multiagent chemotherapy continue to have lower survival rates. While the adoption of pediatric-inspired treatment protocols has enhanced complete remission (CR) rates among younger adults, 20–30% of these patients experience relapse, resulting in a subsequent 5-year OS rate of 40–50%. For relapsed B-ALL in adults, there is no universally accepted standard salvage therapy, and the median OS is short. The cornerstone of B-ALL treatment continues to be the utilization of combined cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens to maximize early and durable disease control. In this manuscript, we go beyond the multiagent chemotherapy medications developed prior to the 1980s and focus on the incorporation of antibody-based therapy for B-ALL with an eye on existing and upcoming approved indications for blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, other monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products in frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. In addition, we discuss emerging investigational therapies that harness the therapeutic vulnerabilities of the disease through targeting apoptosis, modifying epigenetics, and inhibiting the mTOR pathway. Full article

In a scenario characterized by continuous improvement in outcomes, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL, once considered a biologically defined subtype with one of the poorest prognoses, now includes patients achieving long-term survival even without allogeneic stem cell transplantation. First-line therapy is increasingly adopting a chemo-free approach, combining tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with immunotherapy—specifically blinatumomab—which has resulted in high rates of complete molecular responses and improved survival outcomes. Within this paradigm shift, the allocation to transplantation is becoming increasingly selective and genomically oriented, focusing on patients with particularly unfavorable prognostic and predictive factors. For patients undergoing transplantation, maintenance therapy with TKIs has emerged as one of the most important strategies to reduce the risk of relapse. However, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding which patients benefit most from this approach, the optimal TKI agents, dosing strategies, and the duration of maintenance therapy. In this review, we aim to consolidate the available evidence on this topic, analyzing it in the context of the most recent clinical experiences. Full article