Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bycatch reduction device (BRD)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 2242 KB  
Article
Catch Losses and Reduction of Bycatch for Jellyfish Using Marine Mammal Bycatch Reduction Devices in Midwater Trawl Gear
by Jung-Mo Jung, Hyun-Young Kim, Bong-Jin Cha, Sung-Jae Kim, Tae-Suk Kim, Gyeong-Cheol Hyun and Kyu-Suk Choi
Fishes 2025, 10(6), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10060276 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1622
Abstract
The National Institute of Fisheries Science in Korea is developing marine mammal bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) for midwater trawl gear. In this study, we tested two BRD-type guide nets (inclined net panel) with 30° and 45° tilt angles to prevent marine mammals from [...] Read more.
The National Institute of Fisheries Science in Korea is developing marine mammal bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) for midwater trawl gear. In this study, we tested two BRD-type guide nets (inclined net panel) with 30° and 45° tilt angles to prevent marine mammals from reaching the codend and facilitating their escape from the net. Fishing operations were conducted along the east and south coasts of South Korea, and cameras were installed in front of the BRDs to monitor their performance. The catch loss of herring with the 30° guide net was 13% and 11% in number and weight. The catch loss of hairtail was 53% and 51% in number and weight with the 30° guide net. Mackerel showed a 97% catch loss in number and weight with the 45° guide net. The 30° guide net resulted in lower catch loss for rudderfish and jack mackerel compared to the 45° guide net. The jellyfish discard rate of the BRD was 5% and 7% in number and weight with the 30° guide net and 12% and 11% with the 45° guide net, indicating that the 30° guide net was more effective at discarding jellyfish. Mesh selectivity was not strongly related to target species body length. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Fisheries Dynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4314 KB  
Article
A Study on the Catch Losses and Mesh Selectivity Related to the Attachment of Marine Mammal Bycatch Reduction Devices on Midwater Trawl Gear
by Jung-Mo Jung, Min-Seuk Park and Kyu-Suk Choi
Fishes 2024, 9(10), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9100391 - 28 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3341
Abstract
The National Institute of Fisheries Science in Korea is developing marine mammal bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) for high-risk fishing gear, such as trawls. We experimented with two BRD types (guiding nets) attached in front of codend at 30° and 45° angles, and catch [...] Read more.
The National Institute of Fisheries Science in Korea is developing marine mammal bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) for high-risk fishing gear, such as trawls. We experimented with two BRD types (guiding nets) attached in front of codend at 30° and 45° angles, and catch losses and mesh size selectivity were investigated. Experimental fishing operations were conducted along the East Coast of South Korea where whales and dolphins are commonly sighted. The catch was classified according to fishing location, BRD type, codend, and covernet, with measurements recorded for body length, maximum girth, and weight. The average selectivity for each haul was analyzed using the ‘selfisher’ package. The catch loss rates with the BRD attached at tilt angles of 30° and 45° were 11% and 29% for common flying squid, 6% and 28% for sailfin sandfish, and 5% and 8% for pearlside. While the mesh selectivity rates for common flying squid and pearlside remained at 0.2–0.5 across all lengths and tilt angles, the mesh selectivity curve for sailfin sandfish was estimated. There were significant differences in catch loss between 30° and 45° angles, with the 30° angle being more effective in catch loss. We observed a masking effect in the codend. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 24955 KB  
Article
Juvenile and Trash Fish Excluder Device (JTED) for Taiwanese Bottom Trawl
by Chao-Ching Chen, Hsin-Zong Lin and Kuo-Wei Lan
Fishes 2023, 8(4), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8040189 - 30 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3901
Abstract
Juvenile and trash fish excluder devices (JTEDs) are used to mitigate the ecological impact of trawling. Trawling has a large ecological footprint in Taiwan. Thus, this study designed three JTEDs, which differed only in grid interval, for single boat bottom otter trawls that [...] Read more.
Juvenile and trash fish excluder devices (JTEDs) are used to mitigate the ecological impact of trawling. Trawling has a large ecological footprint in Taiwan. Thus, this study designed three JTEDs, which differed only in grid interval, for single boat bottom otter trawls that are commonly used in Taiwan. The designed JTEDs were tested in the waters off of Kaohsiung on a Kaohsiung-based bottom trawler, and the results were as follows. (1) At least 300 species were caught, and 189 of these species had little commercial value; their weight accounted for 52.5% of the total catch. (2) The three JTEDs had good exclusion performance. (3) The ratios of the weight of bycatch excluded to the weight of total catch were 7.9%, 29.1%, and 36.2%, for grid intervals of 10, 15, and 20 mm, respectively. (4) JTEDs with grid intervals of 10, 15, and 20 mm were associated with a 0.4%, 11.5%, and 19.0% loss in revenue, respectively. (5) Mature (and thus commercially valuable) Loliginidae tended to be excluded when the grid interval was 20 or (especially) 15 mm. In general, the designed JTEDs should be used at a grid size of 15 mm because this strikes the best balance between profitability and sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Fishery Facilities, Equipment, and Information Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop