Background: Breast cancer (BC) survivors frequently experience depression, which is associated with poorer quality of life (QoL), increased healthcare utilization, and worse prognosis. Although traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is commonly used as an adjunctive therapy among Chinese populations for cancer-related symptom relief
[...] Read more.
Background: Breast cancer (BC) survivors frequently experience depression, which is associated with poorer quality of life (QoL), increased healthcare utilization, and worse prognosis. Although traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is commonly used as an adjunctive therapy among Chinese populations for cancer-related symptom relief and supportive care, population-based evidence remains limited regarding whether integrated Chinese and Western medicine (ICWM) confers measurable benefits over Western medicine (WM) alone in terms of healthcare utilization and survival. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) system offers a unique nationwide setting to address this gap because it reimburses patients for both WM and TCM services and captures care from a large number of TCM clinics across Taiwan, allowing evaluation of adjunctive TCM use in routine clinical practice at a scale rarely possible in prior studies. We used emergency department visits, hospitalization, and length of stay as pragmatic proxy indicators of patients’ daily functioning and disease burden. Leveraging a 10-year enrollment window (2004–2013) and up to 17 years of follow-up, we hypothesized that ICWM would be associated with a reduced risk of acute care events and lower healthcare expenditures compared with WM alone. This hypothesis was examined in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated across nearly 4000 medical facilities nationwide, encompassing the entire Taiwanese population.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to analyze Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database and Cancer Registry. Women newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 2004 and 2013 who subsequently developed depression (≥3 outpatient diagnoses or 1 hospitalization) were followed until death or 31 December 2021. Patients receiving ≥30 cumulative days of TCM after diagnosis were classified as the ICWM group, whereas those receiving <30 days were classified as the WM group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for all-cause mortality. Healthcare utilization, including emergency department visits, hospitalization, and medical expenditures, was analyzed on a per-person-year basis.
Results: A total of 1193 patients were included, with 488 in the WM group and 705 in the ICWM group. Compared with WM users, ICWM users were younger, had lower body mass index, and were more likely to have stage 0–II disease. ICWM was associated with lower total, inpatient, and emergency healthcare expenditures per person-year, as well as fewer emergency visits per person-year, although outpatient and overall visits were higher. In stage-stratified multivariable analyses, ICWM was associated with lower all-cause mortality in both stage 0–II disease (aHR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39–0.94) and stage III–IV disease (aHR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21–0.67). Kaplan–Meier analyses likewise showed significantly better overall survival in the ICWM group in both early-stage and advanced-stage disease.
Conclusions: In this nationwide retrospective cohort of breast cancer patients with depression, adjunctive ICWM was associated with better survival, lower acute care utilization, and lower healthcare expenditures compared with WM alone. However, because quality of life was not directly measured and the study was based on observational data, QoL-related interpretations should be made cautiously, with healthcare utilization outcomes viewed as indirect proxy indicators rather than direct evidence of improved daily QoL.
Full article