Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (79)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = environmental product declaration (EPD)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 812 KB  
Article
Sensitivity of Product-Stage Global Warming Potential to Declared and Design Thermal Conductivity in Sustainable Retrofit Design
by Mateusz Smoczyk, Anna Szymczak-Graczyk and Barbara Ksit
Sustainability 2026, 18(10), 4875; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104875 (registering DOI) - 13 May 2026
Abstract
Thermal modernization of existing buildings is an important part of sustainability-oriented retrofit practice because it can reduce operational energy demand, but its environmental effect depends partly on the insulation material selected and on the thermal assumptions used in design. This study examines how [...] Read more.
Thermal modernization of existing buildings is an important part of sustainability-oriented retrofit practice because it can reduce operational energy demand, but its environmental effect depends partly on the insulation material selected and on the thermal assumptions used in design. This study examines how the use of declared thermal conductivity (λdecl) and design conductivity (λdesign) affects the required insulation thickness and the A1–A3 global warming potential (GWP) of alternative insulation materials for an attic ceiling separating heated space from an unheated ventilated attic in a multi-family building. This study supports product-stage sustainability assessment; it does not constitute a comparison of the full life cycle climate effect of the selected material groups. The thickness needed to achieve Utarget = 0.15 W/(m2·K) was determined for scenarios based on λdecl, temperature-corrected λdesign, and a moisture sensitivity analysis for cellulose. Environmental assessment was based on European EN 15804+A2-compliant EPDs, with separate reporting of GWPfossil and GWPbiogenic. In the analyzed case, differences between material groups were driven mainly by EPD data, whereas conversion from declared to design thermal properties had a smaller, but not negligible, effect. This effect became more important for moisture-sensitive materials. The results show that sustainability-oriented environmental comparisons based only on declared thermal conductivity may be misleading when functionally equivalent solutions are compared. In the analyzed case, the transition from λdecl to temperature-corrected λdesign resulted in only a small change in the required insulation thickness and the corresponding GWP result. At the same time, the scenario-based sensitivity analysis for cellulose insulation and the variability of data reported in the EPDs indicate that moisture-related assumptions and the selection of input data may be of greater importance. The results show that, when interpreting the environmental performance of insulation solutions in sustainable retrofit design, consistency should be maintained between the adopted functional unit and the method used to define the thermal properties of the material after installation in the building envelope. Full article
17 pages, 2812 KB  
Article
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) Profiles of Ceramic Tiles, Sanitary Ware, Clay Roofing Tiles and Clay Bricks: Insights from One Click LCA and the International EPD System
by Milica Vidak Vasić, Tea Spasojević-Šantić and Zagorka Radojević
Earth 2026, 7(2), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/earth7020055 - 24 Mar 2026
Viewed by 708
Abstract
This study presents a comparative evaluation of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) within the traditional ceramic industry, emphasizing how differences in data structures, reporting formats, and background databases influence the interpretation of environmental performance. Four product categories—ceramic tiles, sanitary ware, clay bricks, and clay [...] Read more.
This study presents a comparative evaluation of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) within the traditional ceramic industry, emphasizing how differences in data structures, reporting formats, and background databases influence the interpretation of environmental performance. Four product categories—ceramic tiles, sanitary ware, clay bricks, and clay roof tiles—were analyzed using datasets from One Click LCA and the International EPD System. Environmental indicators assessed include fossil-based and total Global Warming Potential (GWP), freshwater consumption, and energy demand, standardized per 1 kg of product. The analysis reveals that discrepancies between platforms arise primarily from the limited level of process-specific information required by current EPD formats, rather than from the platforms themselves. Missing details on raw material composition, firing conditions, and energy sources restrict comparability and hinder the development of robust benchmarks. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for harmonized databases, more transparent PCR requirements, and consistent reporting rules to support meaningful cross-platform comparisons. As the first study to examine EPD data structures for ceramic products across two major reporting systems, it highlights the need to expand product-specific benchmarks and enhance disclosure practices to strengthen the role of EPDs in sustainable market design and climate policy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 1768 KB  
Review
Beyond the Label: The Sufficiency Approach Transforms EPDs from an Impact Measurement Tool to Critical Decision-Making Tool for Sustainable Design
by Antonella Violano, Monica Cannaviello and Alessandra Battisti
Sustainability 2026, 18(6), 3088; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063088 - 21 Mar 2026
Viewed by 381
Abstract
This study situates Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) within the broader challenge of decarbonising the built environment, arguing that efficiency-oriented approaches remain insufficient unless complemented by a sufficiency paradigm that already questions “how much is necessary” in the meta-design phase. Building on an interdisciplinary [...] Read more.
This study situates Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) within the broader challenge of decarbonising the built environment, arguing that efficiency-oriented approaches remain insufficient unless complemented by a sufficiency paradigm that already questions “how much is necessary” in the meta-design phase. Building on an interdisciplinary reading of standards and the scientific literature, the paper analyses the regulatory architecture of Type III environmental declarations and discusses the operational implications of the two main reference frameworks for construction EPDs—ISO 21930 (global) and EN 15804 (European)—with attention paid to methodological rigidity, system boundaries, and the granularity of climate-related indicators. The paper highlights that the declared aim of comparability is frequently undermined in practice by heterogeneous Product Category Rules, background databases, modelling assumptions, and verification practices, producing an “illusion of comparability” and limiting the reliability of product-to-product comparisons. Emphasis is placed on the epistemic role of the functional unit and reference service life, showing how narrowly product-based units can conceal system-level effects and bias decision-making. The paper concludes that EPDs are most effective when interpreted as boundary objects linking policy, industry, and design, and when embedded in a sufficiency-oriented “critical ecology of materials” that integrates embodied and operational carbon within contextualised project decisions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1129 KB  
Article
Sensitivity Analysis of CO2 Emitted in Clinker and Cement Production
by Dimitris Tsamatsoulis
Computation 2026, 14(3), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/computation14030071 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 454
Abstract
This study performs a sensitivity analysis of CO2 emissions from clinker and cement production using life cycle assessment (LCA). Both local and global sensitivity analyses (LSA and GSA) are conducted. LSA uses outputs from the GCCA EPD tool—developed by the Global Cement [...] Read more.
This study performs a sensitivity analysis of CO2 emissions from clinker and cement production using life cycle assessment (LCA). Both local and global sensitivity analyses (LSA and GSA) are conducted. LSA uses outputs from the GCCA EPD tool—developed by the Global Cement and Concrete Association to facilitate Environmental Product Declarations—and examines correlations between perturbed input variables and the resulting output changes. For GSA, we present an analytical derivation of Sobol’ indices. We derive quantitative relationships between alternative materials and fuels and key technical indices, while preserving clinker and cement quality throughout the sensitivity analysis. Increasing the share of the alternative fuels (AFs) categories and of recycled concrete produces a negative percentage change in CO2 emitted from the clinker (CO2/CL). The largest CO2/CL reductions arise from high-biomass fuels, followed by alternative solid fuels and refuse-derived fuels, shredded tires, and, lastly, recycled concrete. The clinker-to-cement ratio (CL/CEM) dominates the CO2 emitted in cement production (1% change → 0.926–0.956% change), while clinker-level CO2 reductions transmit to cement with only minor variation, confirmed by Sobol’ indices. Aside from reducing CO2/CL by increasing alternative materials and fuels, the two principal approaches to lowering CO2/CEM are: (i) minimizing clinker content in cement where permitted by applicable standards while maintaining the same performance, and (ii) designing new cement types that deliver equivalent performance with lower clinker content. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Computational Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2602 KB  
Article
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Elastomeric Bitumen and Polymer Modified Bitumen Emulsion for Waterproofing Systems Based on Primary Data
by Jhony Raniery, Fábio de Oliveira Braga, Daiane Cecchin and Lucas Rosse Caldas
Sustainability 2026, 18(6), 2936; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062936 - 17 Mar 2026
Viewed by 397
Abstract
Increasing attention to environmental performance in construction materials has intensified the need for robust Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on bituminous waterproofing systems. This study addresses the lack of comparative LCAs based on primary data for hot-applied Elastomeric Modified Bitumen (EMB) and cold-applied [...] Read more.
Increasing attention to environmental performance in construction materials has intensified the need for robust Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on bituminous waterproofing systems. This study addresses the lack of comparative LCAs based on primary data for hot-applied Elastomeric Modified Bitumen (EMB) and cold-applied Bitumen Emulsion (EMBE), two widely used materials with contrasting application methods and environmental profiles. While EMB has been moderately covered in the literature, this study contributes uniquely by providing one of the first LCAs based on primary data for EMBE, a formulation that is increasingly adopted in the construction sector but still underexplored in environmental assessments. The primary industrial data were combined with international LCI datasets (Ecoinvent) to model environmental impacts using SimaPro 9.4.0.3. Results show that EMBE demonstrates better climate performance (611 kg CO2 eq/t) but is more sensitive to specific additives, especially resins and plasticizers, which significantly increase Ozone Depletion Potential and photochemical ozone formation. The Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) survey analysis further highlights the influence of recycled content, cold mix technologies, and production energy sources on environmental performance. The findings indicate that the selection of waterproofing materials should consider not only technical performance but also the distribution of environmental impacts across the life cycle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) of Sustainable Building Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 1697 KB  
Article
A BIM–LCA Framework for Whole-Life Carbon Assessment Under EPBD: Scope Alignment, Functional Unit Robustness, and Cross-Tool Validation
by Andrés Jonathan Guízar Dena, Mayka García Hípola and Carlos Fernández Bandera
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 2637; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16062637 - 10 Mar 2026
Viewed by 537
Abstract
The recent revision of the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) introduces mandatory whole-life global warming potential (GWP) reporting, creating practical challenges for building life-cycle assessment due to incomplete life-cycle phase coverage in conventional Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). This study develops and [...] Read more.
The recent revision of the European Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) introduces mandatory whole-life global warming potential (GWP) reporting, creating practical challenges for building life-cycle assessment due to incomplete life-cycle phase coverage in conventional Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs). This study develops and validates an integrated BIM–LCA framework for structured whole-building GWP evaluation through harmonized life-cycle module alignment and cross-tool comparison, with emphasis on the early design stages. The workflow combines rapid BIM-based screening with detailed external LCA validation, establishing a tiered assessment strategy that enables iterative material optimization within the BIM environment prior to expert review. The methodology is applied to two residential construction systems (masonry and timber), and three functional units are evaluated: total whole-building GWP, area-normalized GWP, and material-level contributions. Five comparative scenarios are analyzed, including reference, nationally representative, optimized low-carbon, and European benchmark configurations. The results show progressive GWP reductions ranging from 5% to 30% across scenarios. Although substantial absolute deviations are observed between BIM-integrated and professional LCA tools, scenario-level rankings remain fully consistent across all functional units, confirming the robustness of the screening approach for comparative decision-making. Cross-tool validation focuses on an aligned embodied-carbon scope (A1–A3 plus selected end-of-life modules) to ensure screening robustness, while full whole-life LC-GWP (including B-modules and services) is positioned as the regulatory context for subsequent expert-stage assessment. The framework provides an efficient and transferable decision-support methodology that supports early-stage carbon optimization while preserving methodological transparency for regulatory reporting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue BIM in Building and Infrastructure Construction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3240 KB  
Data Descriptor
Service Life Dataset Development for Non-Structural Building Envelope Materials—Current State, Knowledge Gaps and Inconsistencies
by Sara Sadeghi, Marzieh Riahinezhad, Elnaz Esmizadeh and Michael A. Lacasse
Data 2026, 11(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/data11030047 - 28 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 541
Abstract
This study compiles and harmonizes a dataset on the reference service life (RSL) of non-structural building envelope materials in North America. Data was collected from survey-based published reports and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) sourced from either manufacturers’ websites or recognized EPD databases. Relevant [...] Read more.
This study compiles and harmonizes a dataset on the reference service life (RSL) of non-structural building envelope materials in North America. Data was collected from survey-based published reports and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) sourced from either manufacturers’ websites or recognized EPD databases. Relevant North American EPDs were reviewed for RSL or equivalent terms, and the extracted RSL values were recorded and classified by material type. The resulting dataset consolidates survey-based service life values, EPD-derived RSLs, together with their reported frequencies, and the extent of missing data. Analysis of the dataset revealed significant data gaps and strong inconsistencies in currently available RSLs. Many published values are based on client surveys or fixed categorical assumptions, overlooking product-specific durability and often relying on data more than 20 years old. These values do not reflect current manufacturing technologies or construction practices. Furthermore, over half of the reviewed EPDs do not report any RSL, while most of the remaining EPDs simply use default values of 60 or 75 years without clear justification. Although the dataset supports sensitivity and uncertainty analyses in building environmental assessments, the findings underscore the lack of reliability and transparency in existing RSL data and highlight the necessity for a consistent and transparent RSL dataset. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

29 pages, 3719 KB  
Systematic Review
Optimizing Building Sustainability: A Systematic Review of BIM-Based Decision Support Systems
by Shervin Rahnama, Eva Heinlein, Sven Mackenbach and Katharina Klemt-Albert
Sustainability 2026, 18(5), 2341; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052341 - 28 Feb 2026
Viewed by 601
Abstract
In light of the climate protection goals of the Paris Agreement, optimizing the sustainability of planning processes is becoming increasingly important. Building Information Modeling (BIM) centralizes planning information for interdisciplinary evaluation, enabling sustainable decision-making. This paper presents a systematic review of BIM-based decision [...] Read more.
In light of the climate protection goals of the Paris Agreement, optimizing the sustainability of planning processes is becoming increasingly important. Building Information Modeling (BIM) centralizes planning information for interdisciplinary evaluation, enabling sustainable decision-making. This paper presents a systematic review of BIM-based decision support approaches for building sustainability. Following vom Brocke’s five-phase model and the PRISMA 2020 standard, 70 studies were analyzed to identify current methods, their respective strengths and limitations, and future research needs. The findings reveal a highly dynamic but fragmented field of research. Assessment-Based Optimization and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods dominate. However, the holistic integration of ecological, economic and social indicators remains rare, with social sustainability receiving the least attention. Most approaches rely on proprietary BIM environments, while open BIM applications and interoperable data standards remain underdeveloped. Standardized data sources, such as Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), are well established for ecological assessments, but are largely lacking for the economic and social dimensions. The review highlights the urgent need for interoperable data formats, standardized evaluation methods, and accessible databases to enable scalable and comparable BIM-based sustainability optimizations. Advancing these foundations will be essential for achieving consistent, holistic sustainability optimization in the construction industry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

43 pages, 3048 KB  
Systematic Review
Life Cycle Assessment of Power Plants: A Systematic Review of Environmental Impacts Across Electricity Generation Technologies
by Beatrice Marchi, Enrico Bertagna and Lucio E. Zavanella
Sustainability 2026, 18(4), 1994; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041994 - 14 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1021
Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is widely used to evaluate the environmental impact of power generation systems and inform energy and climate policy decisions. In recent years, numerous LCA studies have examined the life-cycle implications of power plants utilizing renewable, nuclear, and fossil fuel [...] Read more.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is widely used to evaluate the environmental impact of power generation systems and inform energy and climate policy decisions. In recent years, numerous LCA studies have examined the life-cycle implications of power plants utilizing renewable, nuclear, and fossil fuel technologies. Nevertheless, the resultant data is fragmented, exhibiting significant diversity among investigations attributable to disparities in system boundaries, technical assumptions, and methodological selections. This document offers a systematic overview of peer-reviewed LCA studies and Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) evaluating the environmental implications of predominant power production technologies, such as solar photovoltaic, wind, hydropower, nuclear, and natural gas power plants. Various environmental effect categories are evaluated, with a specific focus on Global Warming Potential as the most frequently reported and policy-relevant metric. The review consolidates documented impact ranges, assesses the effects of plant size and technological design, and evaluates the contribution of several life cycle stages to overall environmental performance. The findings emphasize prevalent tendencies and significant variability among technologies and studies, illustrating the susceptibility of LCA results to modeling assumptions and data sources. Although current LCAs offer relevant insights into the environmental impact of electricity generation, the review highlights enduring methodological deficiencies, particularly the inadequate handling of uncertainty, the static portrayal of long-lasting infrastructures, and the lack of explicit attention to technological risk. This study consolidates and critically evaluates existing literature, providing a thorough reference on the life-cycle environmental consequences of power plants and facilitating a more educated interpretation of LCA results within energy system planning and policy analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 3165 KB  
Systematic Review
No One-Size-Fits-All: A Systematic Review of LCA Software and a Selection Framework
by Veridiana Souza da Silva Alves, Vivian Karina Bianchini, Barbara Stolte Bezerra, Carlos do Amaral Razzino, Fernanda Neves da Silva Andrade and Sofia Seniciato Neme
Sustainability 2026, 18(1), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010197 - 24 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1989
Abstract
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a fundamental methodology for evaluating environmental impacts across the life cycle of products, processes, and services. However, selecting appropriate LCA software is a complex task due to the wide variety of tools, each with different functionalities, sectoral focuses, [...] Read more.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a fundamental methodology for evaluating environmental impacts across the life cycle of products, processes, and services. However, selecting appropriate LCA software is a complex task due to the wide variety of tools, each with different functionalities, sectoral focuses, and technical requirements. This study conducts a systematic literature review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to map the main characteristics, strengths, and limitations of LCA tools. The review includes 41 studies published between 2017 and 2025, identifying and categorizing 24 different tools. Technical and operational features were analyzed, such as modelling capacity, database compatibility, usability, integration capabilities, costs, and user requirements. Among the tools, five stood out for their frequent application: SimaPro, GaBi, OpenLCA, Umberto, and Athena. SimaPro is recognized for flexibility and robustness; GaBi for its industrial applications and Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) support; OpenLCA for being open-source and accessible; Umberto for energy and process modelling; and Athena for integration with Building Information Modelling (BIM) in construction. Despite their advantages, all tools presented specific limitations, including learning curve challenges and limited scope. The results show that no single tool fits all scenarios. In addition to the synthesis of these characteristics, this study also emphasizes the general features of the identified software, the challenges in making a well-supported selection decision, and proposes a decision flowchart designed to guide users through key selection criteria. This visual tool aims to support a more transparent, systematic, and context-oriented choice of LCA software, aligning capabilities with project-specific needs. Tool selection should align with research objectives, available expertise, and context. This review offers practical guidance for enhancing LCA applications in sustainability science. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 8556 KB  
Review
A Review of Recent Advances in the Application of Cereal Straw for Decarbonization of Construction Materials and Applications
by Nathalie Santamaría-Herrera, Jorge Otaegi and Iñigo Rodríguez-Vidal
Sustainability 2026, 18(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010065 - 20 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1124
Abstract
The construction sector accounts for 39% of GHG emissions, being the main contributor to embodied carbon emissions of building materials, and operational energy consumption for indoor thermal comfort. Cereal straw, an agricultural by-product, is emerging as a low-carbon alternative due to its thermal [...] Read more.
The construction sector accounts for 39% of GHG emissions, being the main contributor to embodied carbon emissions of building materials, and operational energy consumption for indoor thermal comfort. Cereal straw, an agricultural by-product, is emerging as a low-carbon alternative due to its thermal performance and negative embodied carbon. This paper aims to review recent advances of cereal straw as a building material for decarbonization of construction, analyzing its thermal properties, embodied carbon, and large-scale applications. A literature review focused on European-certified straw-based materials, grouped into four categories: straw bales, blown-in insulation, modular systems, and bio-composites. Twelve Product Environmental Declarations (EPDs) and technical specifications were examined to evaluate manufacturing processes, material properties, and Global Warming Potential (GWP) for cradle-to-gate stages (A1–A3), as well as their use in large-scale projects over the past five years. Thermal conductivity ranged from 0.043 to 0.068 W/m·K, while embodied carbon varied between –101.2 and –146.5 kg CO2 eq/m3. Straw bales remain prevalent in small-scale housing, blown-in insulation supports retrofitting, and modular systems offer the most balanced performance, enabling high-rise or extensive built surfaces. The study concludes that straw products have the potential to decarbonize opaque elements of the envelope, reducing operational and embodied energy of buildings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Green and Sustainable Construction Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 704 KB  
Article
Is It Worth It? Potential for Reducing the Environmental Impact of Bitumen Roofing Membrane Production
by Michael T. Schmid and Charlotte Thiel
Recycling 2025, 10(6), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10060208 - 13 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1121
Abstract
Between 51% and 72% of a bituminous roofing membrane used for structural waterproofing consists of organic material, predominantly bitumen—a derivative of crude oil refining—highlighting the strong dependence of this product on fossil resources. Considering that several tonnes of these membranes must be replaced [...] Read more.
Between 51% and 72% of a bituminous roofing membrane used for structural waterproofing consists of organic material, predominantly bitumen—a derivative of crude oil refining—highlighting the strong dependence of this product on fossil resources. Considering that several tonnes of these membranes must be replaced every 30 to 50 years, substantial potential exists for emission reduction through the establishment of circular material systems. This study investigates this potential by analysing 26 Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and life cycle datasets from across Europe covering the period from 2007 to 2023. To ensure comparability, all data were normalised to a declared unit of 1 kg of roofing membrane. The reinforcement layers were categorised into glass and polyester & glass composites, and their differences were examined using Welch’s t-tests. Correlative analyses and linear as well as multiple regression models were then applied to explore relationships between environmental indicators and the shares of organic and mineral mass fractions. The findings reveal that renewable energy sources, although currently representing only a small share of total production energy, provide a major lever for reducing nearly all environmental impact categories. The type of reinforcement layer was also found to influence the demand for fossil resources, both materially and energetically. For most environmental indicators, only multiple regression models can explain at least 30% of the variance based on the proportions of organic and mineral inputs. Overall, the study underscores the crucial importance of high-quality, transparently documented product data for accurately assessing the sustainability of building products. It further demonstrates that substituting fossil energy carriers with renewable sources and optimising material efficiency can substantially reduce environmental burdens, provided that methodological consistency and clarity of indicator definitions are maintained. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 1019 KB  
Article
Linking the LCA of Forest Bio-Based Products for Construction, Ecosystem Services, and Sustainable Forest Management
by Teresa Garnica, Soledad Montilla, José Antonio Tenorio Ríos, Ángel Lora, Antonio J. Molina Herrera and Marta Conde
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 10134; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210134 - 13 Nov 2025
Viewed by 793
Abstract
The multifunctional role of forests in supplying renewable biomaterials and delivering ecosystem services (ESs) is often overlooked in standard life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies, despite its relevance for sustainable construction. This study developed the BioCons Impact Compensation Model (ICM), which integrates ES into [...] Read more.
The multifunctional role of forests in supplying renewable biomaterials and delivering ecosystem services (ESs) is often overlooked in standard life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies, despite its relevance for sustainable construction. This study developed the BioCons Impact Compensation Model (ICM), which integrates ES into life cycle inventory (LCI) databases and quantifies proprietary BioCons Mitigation Indicators, capturing additional environmental information, ensuring transparency, and preventing greenwashing. Using structural Scots pine in Spain as a case study, the GWP-luluc-roots indicator was found to be 226.84 kg CO2-eq/FU, representing 36% of the biogenic carbon (616.45 kg CO2-eq/FU), highlighting the contribution of root-derived carbon to long-term soil carbon storage. The BioCons Mitigation Indicators demonstrate that mitigation generally exceeds environmental impacts, except for HTP-nc-inorganics, with surplus ES available as biocredits to offset emissions in other life cycle stages. Integrating these indicators into environmental product declarations (EPDs) provides a transparent and accurate view of environmental performance. The results validate the hypothesis that forest bio-based construction products (FBCPs) act as carriers of ESs embedded in derived products, supporting more comprehensive and robust sustainability assessments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4406 KB  
Article
Advancing Sustainable Pavements: Life Cycle Assessment and Global Warming Potential Benchmarking for Asphalt Mixtures in Louisiana
by Ibrahim Elnaml, Mohamed Shehata, Louay N. Mohammad, Heather Dylla and Samuel Cooper
Sustainability 2025, 17(22), 9966; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17229966 - 7 Nov 2025
Viewed by 976
Abstract
Transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Louisiana have risen significantly, yet the environmental impacts of asphalt mixture production remain underexplored. This study conducted a cradle-to-gate environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify global warming potential (GWP) for asphalt mixtures produced in Louisiana and [...] Read more.
Transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Louisiana have risen significantly, yet the environmental impacts of asphalt mixture production remain underexplored. This study conducted a cradle-to-gate environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify global warming potential (GWP) for asphalt mixtures produced in Louisiana and establish GWP benchmarks tailored to mixture types. The LCA encompassed material extraction and production, transport to plants, and asphalt mixing, using two datasets: Environmental Product Declarations from the NAPA Eco-label program (21 mixtures) and Job Mix Formulas from the LaPave database at the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) (207 mixtures). GWP was evaluated using the FHWA LCA Pave tool with TRACI 2.1 factors, and benchmarks were set at the 20th, 40th, 50th percentiles, and the average. Statistical analyses assessed differences across nominal maximum aggregate sizes and traffic levels. Results showed GWP benchmarks from both datasets exceeded U.S. General Services Administration thresholds by an average of 6.5%, with significant variation among mixture types. These findings highlight the need for targeted emission reduction strategies and accurate environmental performance evaluation to promote more sustainable pavement practices and greener infrastructure in Louisiana. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2436 KB  
Article
Enhancing the Sustainability of Asphalt Mixtures: A Focus on Operational Factors and Dataset for Environmental Product Declarations
by Rita Kleizienė, Gabriella Buttitta, Nicolás Carreño and Davide Lo Presti
Sustainability 2025, 17(20), 9349; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209349 - 21 Oct 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1127
Abstract
The demand for reliable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) of asphalt mixtures is growing, particularly as they are increasingly used in public road construction tenders across Europe. However, the reliability and comparability of EPDs remain limited due to two main challenges: (i) significant variability [...] Read more.
The demand for reliable Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) of asphalt mixtures is growing, particularly as they are increasingly used in public road construction tenders across Europe. However, the reliability and comparability of EPDs remain limited due to two main challenges: (i) significant variability in dataset selection for key materials such as bitumen and aggregates, and (ii) uncertainty regarding the influence of operational factors, including aggregate moisture, mixing temperature, and transportation. The objective of this research is to assess the influence of dataset selection and operational parameters on the environmental performance of an asphalt mixture, focusing on improving the reliability of EPDs. Within this research, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted using a cradle-to-gate approach (A1–A3), including modules C1–C4 and D, in compliance with EN 15804:2019+A2:2020. Primary data were collected from an asphalt plant in Lithuania, while secondary data were obtained from the Ecoinvent database. The sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the variation of data set choices and key operational factors that influence the environmental impact. The assessment was carried out using the Simapro 9.6 software and the EF 3.1 impact assessment method. The results indicate significant sensitivity to dataset selection, particularly for bitumen and dolomite production, leading to environmental impact variations of up to 41.8% and 35.3%, respectively. Among operational factors, reducing aggregate moisture from 5% to 3% by sheltering stockpiles helps achieve the highest environmental impact reduction (3.2% under the Aggregate Single Score), while lowering mixing temperatures to 130 °C resulted in a 1.6% decrease. Transportation mode selection contributed to emission variations between 1.8% and 6.7%, with long-distance aggregate transport increasing emissions by up to 14.6%. The research findings underscore the critical need for harmonizing dataset selection and optimizing operational processes to improve asphalt sustainability. Standardizing datasets is essential for ensuring fair and transparent EPD generation for asphalt mixtures, particularly when used in road construction tenders, as seen in several European countries. Future research should explore the integration of reclaimed asphalt (RA) and assess its potential environmental benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop