Search Results (995)

Risk assessment of safety-critical software relies heavily on expert reviews prone to high epistemic uncertainty and conflicting judgments. While evidence theory is widely used for information fusion, classical rules often yield counter-intuitive results in high-conflict scenarios. To address this, we propose an uncertainty-driven risk evaluation model based on a dual-dimensional evidence fusion approach. The framework integrates an improved Belief Entropy (BE) and an Evidence Conflict Coefficient (ECC) to quantify reliability from two perspectives: (1) Internal Dimension, using BE to measure inherent uncertainty within individual judgments; and (2) External Dimension, using ECC to measure divergence among multiple sources. By adaptively modifying Basic Probability Assignments (BPAs) with these dual-dimensional weights, the model effectively harmonizes data prior to fusion. Validated through an avionics software airworthiness case study, the methodology significantly enhances fusion stability and accuracy. Results confirm it effectively suppresses extreme deviations and raises the performance floor, providing a robust decision-support tool for safety-critical engineering. Full article

Epistemology remains tacitly anthropocentric: it treats knowledge as something produced and validated through human cognitive capacities such as understanding, intuition, and transparent justification. Yet contemporary science and artificial intelligence increasingly depend on non-human systems that generate mathematically valid results, empirically successful models, and operationally reliable inferences that no human can fully survey or interpret. This article develops xenoepistemics, a structural theory of non-anthropocentric knowledge. The central claim is that epistemic evaluation must be reformulated in terms of system-level properties—reliability, robustness, counterfactual sensitivity, and domain transfer—rather than mentalistic notions such as belief or understanding. I offer (i) a definition of xenoepistemic systems as systems that track structure in a target domain without requiring human-style semantic access; (ii) a minimal account of epistemic agency without minds that avoids trivialization; and (iii) a non-circular trust framework that distinguishes empirical success from epistemic legitimacy using independent validation regimes. This paper addresses a reflexive worry—that a human-authored theory cannot dethrone human epistemology—by separating standpoint from object: xenoepistemics is articulated by humans but is not about human cognition. I discuss the pragmatic value of xenoepistemic knowledge production, the limits of independent verification for opaque systems, domain-relative thresholds for xenoepistemic authority, and the problem of constitutionally human-inaccessible knowledge. Finally, I diagnose and formalize the Marcusian regress paradox: recurrent goalpost-shifting, whereby every machine competence is reclassified as irrelevant once achieved. Xenoepistemics reframes this debate by treating non-human knowledge as a present reality requiring new norms, not as a future curiosity. Full article

Prosignification is defined as the process through which the subject generates new meanings by engaging in aesthetic experience, critical reflection, and creative action. Unlike general theories of meaning-making, which primarily describe the cognitive organization of experience, prosignification foregrounds the symbolic–expressive dimension as the central site of meaning production. It refers to the individual and collective capacity to construct meaning from expressive and symbolic experiences, integrating cognitive, emotional, social, and cultural dimensions of learning through intentional creative mediation. Prosignification operates between knowledge construction and subjective experience, enabling learners to connect conceptual understanding with personal interpretation and emotional involvement. Whereas knowledge construction emphasizes epistemic development and transformative learning focuses on perspective transformation through critical reflection, prosignification centers on the aesthetic reconfiguration of experience through symbolic creation and interpretation. Rooted in constructivist and experiential approaches, it unfolds through active, student-centred methodologies, particularly in Project-Based Learning contexts. However, its distinctive contribution may lie in integrating reflection, expression, and creation as interdependent mechanisms of meaning generation. Art education constitutes a particularly relevant context for this process, as its symbolic nature fosters the embodied and shared construction of meaning. Thus, prosignification cannot be reduced to cognitive restructuring or attitudinal change but involves the expressive re-symbolization of lived experience. Full article

Urban transformations outpace established urban design paradigm shifts. This acceleration widens the gap between inherited theory and contemporary urban realities This article addresses this condition by introducing epistemic urban design as a conceptual orientation and generative inheritance as its procedural extension within urban conditions described as unprecedented urbanism. Drawing on a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature spanning historical, theoretical, and technological developments, the study examines how urban design knowledge is produced, stabilized, and reinterpreted as urban complexity intensifies. The analysis unfolds in three phases. First, it traces how established paradigms historically structured design practices and how current conditions expose their operational limits. Second, it articulates how epistemic urban design treats design knowledge as an evolving resource, specifying analytical dimensions for interpreting diverse urban conditions. Third, it proposes how generative inheritance operationalizes epistemic urban design by linking inherited design knowledge to context-specific empirical situations. The article contributes to urban design research by supporting epistemic urban design with the procedural logic of generative inheritance. This shift enables theoretical insights to systematically inform design operations under conditions of unprecedented urbanism. Full article

Mental health inequities affecting migrant populations stem from structural determinants that hierarchize access to resources, recognition, and social protection. Among these determinants, structural racism plays a central role in the experiences of racialised Brazilian immigrant women in Portugal, producing vulnerabilities at the intersection of race, gender, nationality, and migration status. Grounded in intersectional feminist and decolonial epistemology, this study analyses how structural racism operates as a health determinant through specific mechanisms traversing material conditions of life, distress trajectories, and experiences of psychological care, and it examines how these women navigate the limitations of mental health services, identifying conditions for a practice committed to racial equity. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with racialised Brazilian immigrant women and analyzed through Reflexive Thematic Analysis. The findings indicate that racism is manifested through professional devaluation, labour precarity, documentation instability, and linguistic racialisation, impacting access to rights and the production of psychological distress. Mental health inequities are not limited to barriers to access, as institutional and clinical dynamics tend to individualize distress and disregard its historical and social bases, operating as epistemic violence. The community-based strategies mobilized by participants challenge models centred on individual intervention. This study underscores the need for structurally competent approaches and for institutional reforms oriented toward equity and racial justice within mental health systems. Full article

This article explores the Qurʾānic transformation of poetic travel, situating it within the broader cultural and religious context of Late Antiquity. By examining the Qurʾān’s repeated injunctions to travel and observe the landscape, the study reveals how travel is reconfigured from a poetic act of nostalgic vision into a religious epistemic practice of witnessing divine truth. It compares pre-Islamic Arabic poetic traditions, particularly the qasīda, with Late Antique Christian pilgrimage practices to demonstrate how the Qurʾān synthesizes and reshapes these modes of journeying into a vision-centered theology of travel. Full article

This article examines Max Nordau’s Entartung (Degeneration) (1892/93) at the intersection of fin-de-siècle cultural critique and contemporary psychopathology. It argues that Nordau did not simply denounce modern art, but transferred an established psychiatric vocabulary—centred on degeneration, hysteria, and neurasthenia—into the sphere of aesthetic judgement. Interpreting a range of literary and cultural phenomena as symptoms of pathological degeneration, Nordau sought to diagnose the psychological condition of modern culture through the works of contemporary writers and intellectuals. Situating Entartung within the broader nineteenth-century degeneration paradigm and within contemporary evolutionary debates, the article analyses how scientific discourse was mobilised to authorise cultural evaluation. Rather than assessing the validity of Nordau’s diagnoses, it reconstructs the epistemic logic through which psychiatric categories were transformed into instruments of cultural criticism. In doing so, it repositions Nordau within the history of the human sciences, highlighting his role in the consolidation of expert authority in late nineteenth-century cultural debates. By foregrounding the structural migration of psychiatric categories into cultural criticism, the article contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the alliance between scientific knowledge and normativity at the fin de siècle. Full article

Scientific publishing is currently constrained by an unstructured narrative bottleneck paradigm, which increasingly diverges from the scale, complexity, and computational nature of modern research. Despite rapid advancements in data generation and analysis, scientific knowledge is predominantly disseminated as static narrative artifacts, thereby limiting reproducibility, machine accessibility, and cumulative integration. This study explores how scientific communication can be restructured to facilitate scalable validation and reliable knowledge accumulation. We propose the Object-Oriented Scientific Information paradigm, wherein scientific contributions are represented as executable, machine-interpretable objects that integrate structured data, reproducible methodologies, and formally encoded semantic claims. To operationalize this paradigm, we delineate the architecture of an Autonomous Knowledge Engine, a modular neuro-symbolic system that combines domain-specialized Mixture-of-Experts routing, formal verification of claims, and an information-theoretic filter based on marginal information gain. This architecture enables continuous validation, redundancy control, and the integration of scientific contributions within an active knowledge graph. The analysis demonstrates that Object-Oriented Scientific Information (OOSI) and Autonomous Knowledge Engine (AKE) fundamentally differ from existing document-based, executable, and semantic publishing models by shifting epistemic control from narrative evaluation to computational verification. We conclude that transitioning toward a computable scientific record is essential for sustaining reliable and self-correcting science in the context of accelerating knowledge production. Full article

The study reconsiders the architectural production associated with Russian Suprematism (which was speaking of “the supremacy of pure artistic sensation” rather than the veritable figurative depiction of real-life subjects) in the early Soviet period as a coherent and conceptually rigorous mode of speculative world-making rather than as a marginal or unrealized appendix to avant-garde art history and theory. By examining the architectural propositions articulated by Kazimir Malevich and then elaborated by his younger colleagues Lazar Khidekel, Ilya Chashnik, and Nikolai Suetin, the study advances the claim that Russian Suprematist architecture constituted an epistemic experiment aimed at redefining the very ontological premises of architecture. Far from functioning as a mere transposition of abstract pictorial language into three-dimensional form, Suprematist planits, architectons, and aerocentric projects operated as instruments for thinking spatiality beyond terrestrial gravity, anthropocentric utility, and historical typology. Situating these projects within the intellectual horizon of Russian cosmism and early aerospace thought, the article demonstrates how Suprematist architecture intersected with contemporary philosophical, scientific, and technological discourses that envisioned humanity’s active participation in the reorganization of cosmic space. The architectural imagination of Suprematism emerges here as inseparable from broader debates on excitation, non-objectivity, transformation of matter, and the reconfiguration of human corporeality. Through close analysis of formal strategies, pedagogical frameworks, and theoretical writings, the paper reveals the internal plurality of avant-garde Suprematist architectural inquiry, ranging from ecological proto-urbanism and hovering settlements to magnetic and cruciform spatial systems. Ultimately, the paper argues that the historical non-realization of these projects should not be interpreted as a failure but as an intrinsic feature of their speculative methodology. Suprematist architecture is thus redefined as an anticipatory practice whose unresolved propositions continue to resonate with contemporary discussions on space habitation, planetary design, ecological responsibility, and post-human architectural thought, challenging inherited assumptions about the scope and function of architecture as such. Full article

This article argues that Angela of Foligno’s Memoriale constructs seeing and hearing as epistemic operations through which theological knowledge becomes possible. Rather than treating vision and audition as devotional motifs, the study reads them as structured modes of knowing that transform affect into cognition. Using selective close readings of key passages in the Latin tradition of the Memoriale alongside modern translations, the article shows how sensory language mediates authority, discernment, and transformation. The analysis proceeds in four steps: a methodological clarification concerning textual mediation; an examination of seeing as theological cognition; an analysis of hearing as interior authorization; and a discussion of affective pedagogy in which suffering and compassion become forms of knowledge. The article further argues that Angela’s itinerary moves from Christological imitation toward Trinitarian participation, reframing the culmination of the journey as participation in medio Trinitatis. The Memoriale thus emerges as a theology of perception in which embodiment, affect, and cognition are inseparable. Full article

Deepfakes have emerged as one of the most significant developments in contemporary computational media, representing a sophisticated convergence of machine learning, computer vision, and audiovisual synthesis. Enabled primarily by deep neural networks such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) and transformer-based architectures, Deepfakes are realistic video fabrications through sound and image alteration and substitution that synthesises human likeness, speech, and behaviours. Deepfakes function simultaneously as creative tools, political instruments, security risks, and epistemic disruptors. They have generated widespread scholarly, regulatory, and public concern by contributing to the reshaping of visual communication and posing significant challenges to established norms of authenticity. This entry defines Deepfakes, outlines their technological foundations, synthesises insights from current research and assesses implications for media industries, journalism, documentary, disinformation, governance, and digital culture. Full article

This critical review interrogates how contemporary diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) reforms in STEM education engage the deeper project of epistemic decolonisation. Framed by critical race theory, feminist science studies, and decolonial scholarship, it asks whether inclusion agendas move beyond representational expansion to disrupt Eurocentric hierarchies of legitimacy; which pedagogical and curricular innovations enact pluriversal STEM; and what institutional conditions constrain transformation. A multi-stage search of Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Google Scholar, and grey literature (2010–2025) yielded 152 records; PRISMA-informed screening produced 80 sources for interpretive thematic synthesis. Findings show that DEI initiatives have increased access and participation, yet typically preserve assumptions of scientific neutrality and universalism, leaving epistemic injustice largely intact. In contrast, decolonial innovations, such as two-eyed seeing, culturally sustaining and place-based pedagogies, history, philosophy, and sociology of science integration, and project-based learning grounded in indigenous knowledge systems, reposition learners and communities as co-producers of knowledge and reframe science as situated and relational. However, these practices remain peripheral due to assessment regimes, accreditation pressures, funding and tenure incentives, disciplinary gatekeeping, and limited educator preparation. The review argues that meaningful reform requires structural reconfiguration of curricula, evaluation, and institutional reward systems to recognise multiple epistemologies, cultivate ethical relationality, and enable sustained community partnership. Full article

Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) has gained immense importance due to the global political call for sustainable development. At the same time, the devastating effects of anthropogenic climate change are increasing every year. Humanity is confronted with a situation of sustainable unsustainability. This contribution argues that current competence-oriented approaches to ESD maintain and reinforce unsustainability. Methodological individualism is identified as a main problem in ESD. Furthermore, the human-nature dualism and the idea of an undifferentiated humanity are discussed as problematic epistemic preconditions in the modern Western mindset. Another problem of ESD approaches is the denial and perpetuation of colonial and imperial orders. With regard to these findings, we discuss ways to overcome epistemic preconditions of ESD. We point to collective consciousness and global solidarity as different modes of living and being that offer decolonial alternatives to a good life. Such a reconceptualization implies a repoliticization of education in times of anthropogenic climate change that focuses on the entanglements in epistemic assumptions and conditions of unsustainability as central reference points. Full article

Transdisciplinary Research (TDR) leverages shared concepts to foster mutual learning among diverse stakeholders, relying on “boundary objects” to shape collective identities and visions. However, the existing literature often overlooks the critical roles of subjectivity and conflict in this process. This paper introduces an analytical framework to examine the construction of these objects, using the “Oasis Project” in the Ecuadorian Andes as a central case study. A research-action project on pesticide-free territories in Ecuador unearthed a question during its implementation on how to achieve collective action when key actors are in conflict with each other. Using TDR to find boundary objects where different viewpoints can find shared meaning, it was determined that there is not enough conceptual clarity in the literature around how conflict can actually help achieve coordination. Using a variety of qualitative methods, such as interviews, participatory observation, and analysis of WhatsApp group message texts, this study shows how the novel concepts of boundary entanglements and conflicts can help other researchers and practitioners facilitate impactful TDR. This study emphasizes three transformative lessons for sustainability science: first, boundary objects are inherently dynamic, evolving through continuous social negotiation rather than static definition; second, their successful consolidation requires deep integration into local knowledge systems, cultural norms, and governance structures; and third, and perhaps most critically, conflict and operational breakdowns are not indicators of failure; rather, they serve as vital diagnostic tools that unveil hidden power relations and epistemic boundaries, providing essential moments for critical reflection and the recalibration of collaborative sustainability strategies. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic represented a critical stress test for institutional trust and legitimacy, particularly in societies characterized by pre-existing deficits of confidence in public authorities. In Romania, the health crisis unfolded against a background of low institutional credibility and widespread skepticism toward political and administrative actors. This study examines how institutional authority was discursively evaluated, contested, and delegitimized through public online comments during the most severe phase of the pandemic. The analysis is based on a corpus of 457 comments collected from major Romanian news websites and YouTube channels between 20 and 26 October 2021, corresponding to the peak week in terms of infections and mortality. Drawing on Discourse Analysis and Discursive Psychology, the study combines quantitative coding with qualitative analysis to identify recurrent forms of moral and epistemic criticism, inflammatory discourse, and sarcasm, organized into interpretative repertoires. The findings show that online criticism is structured primarily around accusations of hypocrisy, incompetence, corruption, insensitivity, and authoritarianism. These discourses function not merely as expressions of dissatisfaction but as practices through which commenters articulate moral order, contest institutional legitimacy, and position themselves as morally vigilant and epistemically competent actors entitled to judge public decision-making. Online comment spaces thus emerge as arenas of discursive delegitimation in times of crisis, with important implications for democratic resilience and crisis governance. Full article