Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (23)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = foraminotomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1877 KB  
Article
Clinical Efficacy of Extended Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy Compared with the Conventional Technique
by Yong Ahn, Han-Byeol Park, Seong Son and Byung-Rhae Yoo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(18), 6446; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186446 - 12 Sep 2025
Viewed by 333
Abstract
Objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique for lumbar foraminal stenosis. However, its effectiveness is debated because of concerns regarding adequate decompression and its long-term consistency. This study introduced the extended form of TELF, an advanced [...] Read more.
Objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique for lumbar foraminal stenosis. However, its effectiveness is debated because of concerns regarding adequate decompression and its long-term consistency. This study introduced the extended form of TELF, an advanced technique, to provide more extensive decompression using the same approach. Thus, this study aimed to describe the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of this technique. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent conventional (n = 67) or extended (n = 64) TELF. The surgical procedure involved a transforaminal approach with endoscopic decompression, including the removal of the tip of the superior articular process, foraminal ligament, and ligamentum flavum (conventional group), or additional decompression, involving the isthmus and portions of the superior and inferior pedicle walls (extended group). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog pain scale, Oswestry disability index, and modified Macnab criteria. Results: Despite the longer surgical duration, the extended TELF group tended to show better outcomes in terms of the VAS and ODI scores at the early and final 2-year follow-ups (p < 0.05). The overall success rates were 92.19% and 85.07% in the extended and conventional groups, respectively. No difference was observed in surgical complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Extended TELF, a refined endoscopic technique, achieves better effects than conventional TELF with a lower risk of nerve root irritation by creating a sufficiently safe resection margin. The results support the use of an extended TELF as an advanced form of endoscopic foraminal decompression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1036 KB  
Article
Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database
by Jaskeerat Gujral, Jonathan H. Sussman, Daniel Gao, Yohannes Ghenbot, John D. Arena, Susanna Howard, Hasan S. Ahmad, John Shin, Jang W. Yoon, Ali K. Ozturk, William C. Welch and Mert Marcel Dagli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(18), 6438; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186438 - 12 Sep 2025
Viewed by 385
Abstract
Background/Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Methods: An observational [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Methods: An observational study following STROBE and TRIPOD + AI guidelines compared hospital resource utilization and quality of care between single-level ACDF and PCF (2005–2022). Primary outcomes compared operative time, length of stay (LOS), and post-operative complications. Propensity-scored stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounders, specifically demographics, lifestyle-related factors, pre-operative labs, pre-existing comorbidities, and surgery-related factors. Subgroup analysis compared baseline characteristics and outcomes, stratified by 30-day re-admission and re-operation. Results: PCF group demonstrated shorter LOS (MD −0.7 days, 95% CI −0.9 to −0.5 days, p < 0.001), operative time (MD −32.9 min, 95% CI −35.7 to −30.1 min, p < 0.001), higher rate of re-admission associated with overall SSI (PD 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7–1.7%, p < 0.001), deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.2%, p < 0.001), and organ/space SSI (PD 0.3%, 95% CI 0.0–0.5%, p = 0.011). Furthermore, the PCF group had greater systemic sepsis (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.3%, p < 0.001), overall post-operative SSI (PD 2.8%, 95% CI 2.0–3.6%, p < 0.001), superficial SSI (PD 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2–2.5%, p < 0.001), and deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.2%, p < 0.001) rates. Subgroup analysis showed increased early post-operative re-operation rates in the PCF cohort (PD 23.4%, 95% CI 9.5–37.4%, p = 0.001) and increased early post-operative re-admission associated with post-operative overall SSI (PD 35.3%, 95% CI 22.7–48.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the PCF cohort demonstrated lower hospital utilization, it had reduced quality of care and increased post-operative complications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 712 KB  
Article
Postoperative Radiologic Changes in Early Recurrent Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Lower Lumbar Segments
by Chi-Ho Kim, Pius Kim, Chang-Il Ju and Jong-Hun Seo
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1299; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101299 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 678
Abstract
Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no research has investigated postoperative radiological changes. The aim of this study is to analyze the radiological changes occurring in cases of early recurrence within six months after endoscopic foraminal decompression. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with unilateral lumbar foraminal stenosis who underwent full endoscopic foraminotomy at a single institution. The study included 11 recurrent patients who initially experienced symptomatic improvement and sufficient neural decompression on radiological evaluation, but exhibited recurrent radicular pain and radiological restenosis within six months postoperatively. Additionally, 33 control patients with favourable clinical outcomes and no evidence of restenosis were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative plain X-ray imaging was used to evaluate sagittal and coronal parameters reflecting spinal anatomical characteristics, including disc height, foraminal height, disc wedging, coronal Cobb’s angle, total lumbar lordosis angle, segmental lumbar lordosis angle, and dynamic segmental lumbar lordosis angle. The study aimed to analyze postoperative changes in these parameters between the recurrent and control groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex distribution, presence of adjacent segment disease, or existence of Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Analysis of preoperative and postoperative radiological changes revealed that, in the recurrent group, disc height and foraminal height showed a significant decrease postoperatively, while disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle demonstrated a significant increase. In contrast, the control group exhibited a significant postoperative increase in the total lumbar lordosis angle and segmental lumbar lordosis angle. Conclusions: Progressive worsening of disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle, and reductions in disc and foraminal height, along with minimal improvement in lumbar lordosis following TELF, suggest the presence of irreversible preoperative degenerative changes. Careful radiologic assessment and close postoperative monitoring are essential to identify patients at risk of early recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1721 KB  
Article
Endoscopic Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Neuro-Foramen Stenosis: Role of CT in Treatment Planning and Post-Operative Assessment
by Giovanni Foti, Gianluca Tripodi, Giuseppe Ocello, Guglielmo Manenti, Giorgio Merci, Thomas Mignolli, Lorenza Sanfilippo, Massimo Guerriero and Gerardo Serra
Life 2025, 15(4), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040615 - 7 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 714
Abstract
Purpose: to outline the role of CT in pre- and post-treatment evaluation in the case of lumbar endoscopic foraminotomy. Methods: This prospective study, conducted between September 2020 and January 2024, included consecutive patients with clinical symptoms of lumbar sciatica/lumbalgia/lombo-cruralgia/lower limb peripheral neuropathy. Pre- [...] Read more.
Purpose: to outline the role of CT in pre- and post-treatment evaluation in the case of lumbar endoscopic foraminotomy. Methods: This prospective study, conducted between September 2020 and January 2024, included consecutive patients with clinical symptoms of lumbar sciatica/lumbalgia/lombo-cruralgia/lower limb peripheral neuropathy. Pre- and post-foraminotomy CT imaging was used to assess the foraminal diameters (cranio-caudal, transverse and free hand ROI area) before and after the treatment. Two independent blinded readers assessed the CT randomly. VAS pain scale and the measurements of each foramen were compared before and after treatment. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results: A total of 47 participants were enrolled, with 53 intervertebral levels analyzed. The mean VAS value decreased from 9.17 in the preoperative period to 0.66 at the one-month postoperative follow-up. The clinical response was associated with statistically significant changes in the cranio-caudal and transverse diameters, as well as the area of the treated neuroforamina (p-values < 0.05). Inter-rater reliability between the two operators ranged from 0.75 to 0.90. Conclusions: CT can demonstrate a significant enlargement of the neuroforaminal diameters after the endoscopic foraminotomy, with good correlation with clinical improvement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4894 KB  
Review
Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels
by Chae-Gwan Kong and Jong-Beom Park
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062038 - 17 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1667
Abstract
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or [...] Read more.
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or facet joint degeneration, necessitating revision surgery. Reoperation strategies depend on the failure mechanism, instability, sagittal malalignment, and neural compression. Anterior revision is suited for prosthesis failure, recurrent disc herniation, or ASD, enabling prosthesis removal, decompression, and fusion. In select cases, reimplantation may restore motion. Posterior approaches are preferred for facet degeneration, multilevel stenosis, or posterior hypertrophy, with options including foraminotomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy and fusion. Complex cases may require combined anterior and posterior surgery for optimal decompression and stability. This narrative review outlines revision strategies, emphasizing biomechanical assessment, radiographic evaluation, and patient-specific considerations. Despite surgical challenges, meticulous planning and execution can optimize outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3420 KB  
Article
Implementation and Feasibility of Mechanomyography in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
by Fabian Sommer, Ibrahim Hussain, Noah Willett, Mousa K. Hamad, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Sertac Kirnaz, Lynn McGrath, Jacob Goldberg, Amanda Ng, Catherine Mykolajtchuk, Sam Haber, Vincent Sullivan, Pravesh S. Gadjradj and Roger Härtl
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(2), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15020042 - 23 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1507
Abstract
Background: Mechanomyography (MMG) is a neurodiagnostic technique with a documented ability to evaluate the compression of nerve roots. Its utility in degenerative spine surgery is unknown. Objective: To assess the utility of intraoperative MMG during cervical posterior foraminotomy, minimally invasive transforaminal [...] Read more.
Background: Mechanomyography (MMG) is a neurodiagnostic technique with a documented ability to evaluate the compression of nerve roots. Its utility in degenerative spine surgery is unknown. Objective: To assess the utility of intraoperative MMG during cervical posterior foraminotomy, minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and tubular lumbar far lateral discectomy. Methods: A prospective feasibility study was conducted during which MMG was applied during three procedures. Adhesive accelerometers were placed on two muscle groups per procedure. Stimulus threshold in mA was recorded before and after the decompression of the nerve root. Differences in stimulation thresholds were correlated with operative findings. Results: In total, 22 patients were included in this study; 5 patients underwent cervical foraminotomies, 3 underwent MIS-TLIFs, and 14 underwent tubular far lateral discectomies. For the foraminotomies, all cases showed a reduction in stimulation threshold (mean of 3.4 mA) after decompression. For MIS-TLIF cases, there was a limited reduction in the stimulation threshold after decompression (mean 1.7 mA). For far lateral discectomy, there was a mean reduction of 4.3 mA in the stimulation threshold following decompression. Conclusions: MMG is a method that may provide intraoperative feedback on the decompression of nerve roots. In the context of MIS-TLIF, MMG showed a limited decrease in stimulus threshold. This may be due to the identification of the nerve occurring after decompression is already underway. For cervical foraminotomies and far lateral discectomies, MMG showed promising results in determining adequate decompression of the nerve root. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4606 KB  
Article
Comparison of Open Microscopic and Biportal Endoscopic Approaches in Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes
by Hyung Rae Lee, Jae Min Park, In-Hee Kim, Jun-Hyun Kim and Jae-Hyuk Yang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010164 - 30 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1238
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of open microscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) PCF in multi-level cases. While BESS PCF is effective in single-level surgeries, its role in multi-level procedures remains unclear. Methods: This [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of open microscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) PCF in multi-level cases. While BESS PCF is effective in single-level surgeries, its role in multi-level procedures remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients treated for cervical radiculopathy from 2016 to 2023, divided into two groups, open microscopic PCF (Group M, n = 30) and BESS PCF (Group B, n = 30). Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological parameters included cervical angle, segmental angle, range of motion (ROM), and the extent of facetectomy. Results: Both groups showed improvement in the arm pain VAS and the NDI. However, Group B exhibited significantly better neck pain on the VAS at the final follow-up (p = 0.03). Radiologically, Group B maintained lordotic cervical and segmental angles postoperatively, while Group M showed kyphotic changes (p < 0.01). Segmental ROM was larger in Group M, indicating greater instability (p < 0.01). Group B had less extensive facetectomy while achieving comparable foraminal enlargement. Operative time was longer for Group B (p < 0.001). Conclusions: BESS PCF preserves cervical stability and reduces postoperative neck pain compared to open microscopic PCF in multi-level procedures. Despite longer operative times, its benefits in minimizing instability make it a promising option for treating multi-level cervical radiculopathy. Further research with long-term follow-up is recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery: Clinical Advances and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1646 KB  
Article
Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
by Dong-Ho Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Ji Uk Choi, Jae Min Park and Jae-Hyuk Yang
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1496; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091496 - 13 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1352
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) aims to resolve cervical radiculopathy while preserving range of motion (ROM). However, its effectiveness in maintaining ROM is uncertain. This study investigates the changes in ROM after PCF and identifies preoperative factors that influence ROM reduction [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) aims to resolve cervical radiculopathy while preserving range of motion (ROM). However, its effectiveness in maintaining ROM is uncertain. This study investigates the changes in ROM after PCF and identifies preoperative factors that influence ROM reduction post surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated at our hospital from August 2016 to September 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological outcomes included the segmental angle (SA), cervical angle (CA), C2–C7 SVA, Pfirrmann grade, extent of facetectomy, foraminal stenosis, and ROM. Patients were categorized into two groups based on segmental ROM changes: decreased (Group D) and maintained (Group M). Radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for ROM loss after PCF. Results: 76 patients were included: 34 in Group D and 42 in Group M, with no demographic differences. Preoperatively, Group D had significantly larger flexion segmental and cervical angles than Group M (segmental, p < 0.001; cervical, p = 0.001). Group D also had a higher Pfirrmann grade (p = 0.014) and more bony bridge formations (p = 0.004). While no significant differences were observed in arm pain VAS and NDI scores, Group D exhibited worse neck pain VAS at the last follow-up (p = 0.03). Univariate linear regression indicated that preoperative segmental ROM (p < 0.001, B = 0.82) and bony bridge formation (p = 0.046, B = 5.33) were significant predictors of ROM loss post PCF. Conclusions: Patients with higher preoperative flexion angles and Pfirrmann grades at the operative level are at an increased risk for ROM loss and neck pain and often exhibit bony bridge formation. Accounting for these factors can improve surgical planning and patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3237 KB  
Systematic Review
Exploring Pathways for Pain Relief in Treatment and Management of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
by Renat Nurmukhametov, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion Ramirez, Medet Dosanov, Abakirov Medetbek, Stepan Kudryakov, Gervith Reyes Soto, Claudia B. Ponce Espinoza, Jeff Natalaja Mukengeshay, Tshiunza Mpoyi Cherubin, Vladimir Nikolenko, Artem Gushcha, Salman Sharif and Nicola Montemurro
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(8), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14080740 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4422
Abstract
Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) involves the narrowing of neural foramina, leading to nerve compression, significant lower back pain and radiculopathy, particularly in the aging population. Management includes physical therapy, medications and potentially invasive surgeries such as foraminotomy. Advances in diagnostic and treatment [...] Read more.
Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) involves the narrowing of neural foramina, leading to nerve compression, significant lower back pain and radiculopathy, particularly in the aging population. Management includes physical therapy, medications and potentially invasive surgeries such as foraminotomy. Advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies are essential due to LFS’s complexity and prevalence, which underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing patient outcomes. Method: This literature review on LFS employed a systematic methodology to gather and synthesize recent scientific data. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases using specific keywords related to LFS. The search, restricted to English language articles from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023, focused on peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials and reviews. Due to the heterogeneity among the studies, data were qualitatively synthesized into themes related to diagnosis, treatment and pathophysiology. Results: This literature review on LFS analyzed 972 articles initially identified, from which 540 remained after removing duplicates. Following a rigorous screening process, 20 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. These studies primarily focused on evaluating the diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficacy and pathophysiological insights into LFS. Conclusion: The comprehensive review underscores the necessity for precise diagnostic and management strategies for LFS, highlighting the role of a multidisciplinary approach and the utility of a unified classification system in enhancing patient outcomes in the face of this condition’s increasing prevalence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends and Technologies in Modern Neurosurgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 12375 KB  
Technical Note
Novel Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Cervical Spondylosis Myeloradiculopathy: A Technical Note and Clinical Results
by Kai-Ting Chien, Yu-Cheng Chen, Ting-Kuo Chang, Yueh-Ching Liu, Lei-Po Chen, Yu-Ching Huang, Yan-Shiang Lian and Jian-You Li
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1910; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071910 - 26 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2097
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the efficacy of the Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (CE-ULFBD) technique in treating cervical myeloradiculopathy, primarily caused by degenerative spondylosis. Traditionally managed through multisegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy, this [...] Read more.
Background: This study investigates the efficacy of the Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (CE-ULFBD) technique in treating cervical myeloradiculopathy, primarily caused by degenerative spondylosis. Traditionally managed through multisegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy, this condition has recently experienced a promising shift towards minimally invasive approaches, particularly endoscopic spinal decompression. While empirical evidence is still emerging, these techniques show potential for effective treatment. Method: The objective was to evaluate the outcomes of CE-ULFBD in achieving single or multilevel bilateral foraminal and central decompression, emphasizing the reduction of injury to posterior cervical muscles and the associated postoperative neck soreness common in conventional procedures. This paper delineates the surgical procedures involved in CE-ULFBD and presents the clinical outcomes of nine patients diagnosed with myeloradiculopathy due to severe cervical stenosis. Result: Assessments were conducted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) for the activity measurement of daily living. Results indicated a considerable decrease in pain levels according to the VAS, coupled with significant improvements in functional capacities as measured by the mJOA scale. Additionally, no major postoperative complications were noted during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The study concludes that CE-ULFBD is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy resulting from severe cervical stenosis, offering a viable and less invasive alternative to traditional decompressive surgeries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery – from Basics to Advances Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 569 KB  
Systematic Review
Limited Intervention in Adult Scoliosis—A Systematic Review
by Zuhair Jameel Mohammed, John Worley, Luke Hiatt, Sakthivel Rajan Rajaram Manoharan and Steven Theiss
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041030 - 11 Feb 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2781
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Adult scoliosis is traditionally treated with long-segment fusion, which provides strong radiographic correction and significant improvements in health-related quality of life but comes at a high morbidity cost. This systematic review seeks to examine the literature behind limited interventions in adult scoliosis [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Adult scoliosis is traditionally treated with long-segment fusion, which provides strong radiographic correction and significant improvements in health-related quality of life but comes at a high morbidity cost. This systematic review seeks to examine the literature behind limited interventions in adult scoliosis patients and examine the best approaches to treatment. Methods: This is a MEDLINE- and PubMed-based literature search that ultimately included 49 articles with a total of 21,836 subjects. Results: Our search found that long-segment interventions had strong radiographic corrections but also resulted in high perioperative morbidity. Limited interventions were best suited to patients with compensated deformity, with decompression best for neurologic symptoms and fusion needed to treat neurological symptoms secondary to up-down stenosis and to provide stability across unstable segments. Decompression can consist of discectomy, laminotomy, and/or foraminotomy, all of which are shown to provide symptomatic relief of neurologic pain. Short-segment fusion has been shown to provide improvements in patient outcomes, albeit with higher rates of adjacent segment disease and concerns for correctional loss. Interbody devices can provide decompression without posterior element manipulation. Future directions include short-segment fusion in uncompensated deformity and dynamic stabilization constructs. Conclusions: Limited interventions can provide symptomatic relief to adult spine deformity patients, with indications mostly in patients with balanced deformities and neurological pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Scoliosis, Spinal Deformity and Other Spinal Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2476 KB  
Article
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Juxta-Fusional Foraminal Stenosis
by Yong Ahn and Han-Byeol Park
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5745; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175745 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2251
Abstract
Adjacent segment foraminal stenosis is a significant adverse event of lumbar fusion. Conventional revision surgery with an extended fusion segment may result in considerable surgical morbidity owing to extensive tissue injury. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for [...] Read more.
Adjacent segment foraminal stenosis is a significant adverse event of lumbar fusion. Conventional revision surgery with an extended fusion segment may result in considerable surgical morbidity owing to extensive tissue injury. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for symptomatic foraminal stenosis. This study aimed to demonstrate the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of TELF for the treatment of juxta-fusional foraminal stenosis. Full-scale foraminal decompression was performed via a transforaminal endoscopic approach under local anesthesia. A total of 22 consecutive patients who had undergone TELF were evaluated. The included patients had unilateral foraminal stenosis at the juxta-fusional level of the previous fusion surgery, intractable lumbar radicular pain despite at least six months of non-operative treatment, and verified pain focus by imaging and selective nerve root block. The visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved after the two-year follow-up period. The modified MacNab criteria were excellent in six patients (27.27%), good in 12 (55.55%), fair in two (9.09%), and poor in two (9.09%), with a 90.91% symptomatic improvement rate. No significant surgical complications were observed. The minimally invasive TELF is effective for juxta-fusional foraminal stenosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 2170 KB  
Article
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Comparative Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) for Cervical Foraminal Pathology
by Hyeun Sung Kim, Pang Hung Wu, Brian Zhao Jie Chin and Il Tae Jang
Medicina 2023, 59(7), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071222 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2134
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The purpose was to compaSre medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Materials [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The purpose was to compaSre medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Materials and Methods: A prospective registry of patients who had undergone either PPPV PECD surgery or ACDF surgery for cervical disc herniation or foraminal pathologies under a single fellowship-trained spine surgeon was performed. The baseline characteristics and operative details including complications were recorded for all included patients. The clinical outcomes evaluated include VAS, MJOA, motor score, and NDI and MacNab’s score. The radiological parameters in neutral-measured facet length, facet area, disc height, C2–C7 angle, neck tilt angle, T1 slope and thoracic inlet angle were also evaluated. Results: A total of 55 patients (29 PPPV PECD, 26 ACDF) were included, with mean follow-up periods of 21.9 and 32.3 months, respectively. Each cohort was noted to have a single case of surgical complication. Statistically significant changes of facet area (49.05 ± 14.50%) and facet length (52.71 ± 15.11%) were noted in the PPPV PECD group. At neutral alignment of the neck on a lateral X-ray, compared to ACDF, PPPV PECD had a statistically significant change in neck tilt angle (−11.68 ± 17.35°) and T1 slope angle (−11.69 ± 19.58°). Whilst both PPPV PECD and ACDF had significant improvements in VAS, MJOA and NDI postoperatively, PPPV PECD was found to be superior across all above scores at various follow-up timepoints compared to its ACDF counterparts. Conclusions: PPPV PECD surgery achieved a satisfactory radiological correction of neck alignment and significantly improved clinical outcomes at medium-term follow-up for our cohort of patients, highlighting its feasibility in treating patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Endoscopic Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 919 KB  
Article
Microendoscopic Surgery for Degenerative Disorders of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: The Influence of the Tubular Workspace on Instrument Angulation, Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Reoperation Rates
by Joachim M. Oertel and Benedikt W. Burkhardt
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(6), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060912 - 30 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2037
Abstract
Background: Long-term clinical outcomes with microendoscopic spine surgery (MESS) are poorly investigated. The effect of instrument angulation on clinical outcomes has yet to be assessed. Methods: A total of 229 consecutive patients operated on via two MESS systems were analyzed. Instrument angulation for [...] Read more.
Background: Long-term clinical outcomes with microendoscopic spine surgery (MESS) are poorly investigated. The effect of instrument angulation on clinical outcomes has yet to be assessed. Methods: A total of 229 consecutive patients operated on via two MESS systems were analyzed. Instrument angulation for both MESS systems, which differ from each other regarding the working space for instruments, was assessed using a computer model. Patients’ charts and endoscopic video recordings were reviewed to determine clinical outcomes, complications, and revision surgery rates. At a minimum follow-up of two years, clinical outcomes were assessed employing the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: A total of 52 posterior cervical foraminotomies (PCF) and 177 lumbar decompression procedures were performed. The mean follow-up was six years (range 2–9 years). At the final follow-up, 69% of cervical and 76% of lumbar patients had no radicular pain. The mean NDI was 10%, and the mean ODI was 12%. PCF resulted in excellent clinical outcomes in 80% of cases and 87% of lumbar procedures. Recurrent disc herniations occurred in 7.7% of patients. The surgical time and repeated procedure rate were significantly lower for the MESS system with increased working space, whereas the clinical outcome and rate of complication were similar. Conclusions: MESS achieves high success rates for treating degenerative spinal disorders in the long term. Increased instrument angulation improves access to the compressive pathology and lowers the surgical time and repeated procedure rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Personalized Pain Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2904 KB  
Article
Posterior Preventive Foraminotomy before Laminectomy Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation May Decrease the Incidence of C5 Palsy in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery in Patients with Severe Myeloradiculopathy
by Yong-Ho Lee, Mahmoud Abdou, Ji-Won Kwon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, You-Gun Won, Tae-Jin Lee and Byung-Ho Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(6), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062227 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3869
Abstract
C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an [...] Read more.
C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an independent risk factor for C5 palsy. In this study, we tried to investigate different techniques for foramen decompression with posterior cervical fusion and assess the incidence of C5 palsy with each technique depending on the order of foraminal decompression. A combined 540° approach with LMS and uncovertebrectomy was used in group 1. Group 2 combined a 540° approach with pedicle screws and posterior foraminotomy, while posterior approach only with pedicle screws and foraminotomy was used in group 3. For groups 2 and 3, prophylactic posterior foraminotomy was performed before laminectomy. Motor manual testing to assess C5 palsy, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined before and after surgery. Simple radiographs, MRI and CT scans, were obtained to assess radiologic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 362 patients were enrolled in this study: 208 in group 1, 72 in group 2, and 82 in group 3. The mean age was 63.2, 65.5, and 66.6 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median for fused levels was 4 for the three groups. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of fused levels. Weight, height, comorbidities, and diagnosis were not significantly different between groups. Preoperative JOA scores were similar between groups (p = 0.256), whereas the preoperative NDI score was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 2 (p = 0.040). Mean JOA score at 12-month follow-up was 15.5 ± 1.89, 16.1 ± 1.48, and 16.1 ± 1.48 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was higher in group 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.008) and in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.024). NDI score at 12 months was 13, 12, and 13 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was significantly better in group 3 than in group 1 (p = 0.040), but there were no other significant differences between groups. The incidence of C5 palsy was significantly lower in posterior foraminotomy groups with pedicle screws (groups 2 and 3) than in LMS with uncovertebrectomy (group 1) (p < 0.001). Thus, preventive expansive foraminotomy before decompressive laminectomy is able to significantly decrease the root tethering by stenotic lesion, and subsequently, decrease the incidence of C5 palsy associated with posterior only or combined posterior and anterior cervical fusion surgeries. Additionally, such expansive foraminotomy might be appropriate with pedicle screw insertion based on biomechanical considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Challenges and Advances in Cervical Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop