Search Results (3)

Agrotechnological procedures related to forest management, including planting, are burdensome and the energy expenditure of the people working is very high. Nowadays, planting is usually carried out manually, and sometimes with the use of planters coupled to universal tractors. Occasionally, planters mounted on high-power carriers are used, and usually the seedlings are removed from their cassettes and placed manually into the planter’s storage unit. In connection with the above, the prototype of a mobile automatic device for performing forest regeneration tasks and afforestation of post-agricultural and reclaimed areas (RoboFoR) was designed. The main task of this vehicle is planting forest tree seedlings with a covered root system, which are collected directly from their nursery cassettes. This study presents the structure, principle of operation and results of operational tests of the seedling storage and feeding unit. It was found that the unit achieved the expected work efficiency. However, imperfections in the system related to the non-centralized distribution of seedlings in containers and the high variability of biometric characteristics of the seedlings were also identified. A new solution for this unit was proposed, which will increase the reliability of collecting the seedlings. A new solution requires greater computational power of the control unit as well as equipping the sensor system with a technologically advanced root neck detection system. The new concept also assumes the possibility of independent movement of each gripper. Full article

Community forestry is a strategy in which communities are, to some degree, responsible for managing the forests, using a more participatory approach to replace the traditional top-down model. Various forms of policies and governance have been developed to balance goals to ensure the community’s socioeconomic resilience and the landscape’s biological sustainability. The reinvestment of community forest (CF) income back into forest regeneration is not well documented, and there is a lack of research comparing forest income to the costs associated with forest regeneration. This research examines how changes in timber income and forest-regeneration costs affected CF social and ecological viability. We conducted expert elicitation interviews for CFs (n = 33) under three zones of management in Chitwan, Nepal (Zone 1: buffer zone, Zone 2: forest corridor, and Zone 3: community forest). To examine how CFs differ financially, we asked questions regarding timber income and forest-regeneration expenditures and then posed 22 questions regarding socioeconomic and biological aspects of the CF. Finally, a Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test was performed to determine whether there were statistically significant differences in perceptions between groups, including zone, timber income (high, medium, low), and forest-regeneration expenditures (high, medium, low). The amount of income from timber had a substantial impact on the communities’ biological benefits and financial stability. Lower timber-income areas were thought to be less economically stable, lack the resources to enforce rules and regulations necessary to meet the CF’s socioeconomic or biological goals, and place more significant restrictions on the amount of wood members can harvest from the forest. Communities that spent less money on forest regeneration reported poorer levels of forest regeneration, economic sustainability, and community rights. Our research shows that community-forest user groups in the Chitwan district have a significant income and expenditure gap between their forests’ biological and socioeconomic advantages and resilience. Full article

Frugivorous primates have developed several strategies to deal with wild fruit scarcity, such as modifying their activity budget or enlarging their diet. Agricultural expansion threatens primate habitats and populations (e.g., disease transmission, agrochemical exposure), but it also increases crop feeding opportunities. We aimed at understanding whether maize presence close to the natural habitat of chimpanzees, a threatened species, would lead to significant behavioral modifications. We monitored 20 chimpanzees over 37 months in Kibale National Park, Uganda, with maize gardens at the forest edge. Based on focal nest-to-nest data, we analyzed their diet, activity budget, and energy balance depending on wild fruit and maize availability. We found that the Sebitoli area is a highly nutritive habitat for chimpanzees, with large and caloric wild fruits available all year long. The chimpanzees opportunistically consume maize and exploit it by resting less during maize season. However, no significant variation was found in daily paths and energy expenditures according to maize availability. No behavioral or energy modification was observed regarding wild resources either. Despite the availability of nutritious domestic resources, chimpanzees still exploit wild fruits and do not limit their movements. Thus, their contribution to seed dispersal and forest regeneration in this area is not affected. Full article