Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = generalized bicycle codes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 634 KB  
Article
Distance Bounds for Generalized Bicycle Codes
by Renyu Wang and Leonid P. Pryadko
Symmetry 2022, 14(7), 1348; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071348 - 30 Jun 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2793
Abstract
Generalized bicycle (GB) codes is a class of quantum error-correcting codes constructed from a pair of binary circulant matrices. Unlike for other simple quantum code ansätze, unrestricted GB codes may have linear distance scaling. In addition, low-density parity-check GB codes have a naturally [...] Read more.
Generalized bicycle (GB) codes is a class of quantum error-correcting codes constructed from a pair of binary circulant matrices. Unlike for other simple quantum code ansätze, unrestricted GB codes may have linear distance scaling. In addition, low-density parity-check GB codes have a naturally overcomplete set of low-weight stabilizer generators, which is expected to improve their performance in the presence of syndrome measurement errors. For such GB codes with a given maximum generator weight w, we constructed upper distance bounds by mapping them to codes local in Dw1 dimensions, and lower existence bounds which give dO(n1/2). We have also conducted an exhaustive enumeration of GB codes for certain prime circulant sizes in a family of two-qubit encoding codes with row weights 4, 6, and 8; the observed distance scaling is consistent with A(w)n1/2+B(w), where n is the code length and A(w) is increasing with w. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2076 KB  
Article
Influence Factor Analysis of Bicycle Free-Flow Speed for Determining the Design Speeds of Separated Bicycle Lanes
by Xingchen Yan, Jun Chen, Hua Bai, Tao Wang and Zhen Yang
Information 2020, 11(10), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100459 - 25 Sep 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3049
Abstract
To provide a knowledge basis for updating the design speed in bicycle facility codes, this paper examines factors that influence bicycle free-flow speed. We investigated six segments of Nanjing’s separated bicycle lane and established a generalized linear model of the relationship between bicycle [...] Read more.
To provide a knowledge basis for updating the design speed in bicycle facility codes, this paper examines factors that influence bicycle free-flow speed. We investigated six segments of Nanjing’s separated bicycle lane and established a generalized linear model of the relationship between bicycle free-flow speed and bicyclists’ gender, age, bicycle type, lane width, bicycle lateral position, and travel period. With the model, we determined the statistical significance of each factor and assessed each factor’s impact extent. Through comparing the 85th percentile speeds of different groups, we proposed the recommended values and a method for calculating the design speed of separate bicycle lanes. The following results and conclusions were obtained: (1) The significant influential factors of bicycle free-flow speed were bicyclists’ gender and age, bicycle type, lane width, and bicycles’ lateral position. (2) Bicycle type had the greatest impact on bicycle free-flow speed, following by bicycle lateral position, gender, age, and lane width in sequence. (3) The recommended design speeds for separate lanes of less than 3.5 m and the wider lanes were 25 km/h and 30 km/h, respectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 3678 KB  
Review
Characterised Flavin-Dependent Two-Component Monooxygenases from the CAM Plasmid of Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17453 (NCIMB 10007): ketolactonases by Another Name
by Andrew Willetts
Microorganisms 2019, 7(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7010001 - 20 Dec 2018
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4872
Abstract
The CAM plasmid-coded isoenzymic diketocamphane monooxygenases induced in Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17453 (NCIMB 10007) by growth of the bacterium on the bicyclic monoterpene (rac)-camphor are notable both for their interesting history, and their strategic importance in chemoenzymatic syntheses. Originally named ‘ketolactonase—an [...] Read more.
The CAM plasmid-coded isoenzymic diketocamphane monooxygenases induced in Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17453 (NCIMB 10007) by growth of the bacterium on the bicyclic monoterpene (rac)-camphor are notable both for their interesting history, and their strategic importance in chemoenzymatic syntheses. Originally named ‘ketolactonase—an enzyme system for cyclic lactonization’ because of its characterised mode of action, (+)-camphor-induced 2,5-diketocamphane 1,2-monooxygenase was the first example of a Baeyer-Villiger monooxygenase activity to be confirmed in vitro. Both this enzyme and the enantiocomplementary (−)-camphor-induced 3,6-diketocamphane 1,6-monooxygenase were mistakenly classified and studied as coenzyme-containing flavoproteins for nearly 40 years before being correctly recognised and reinvestigated as FMN-dependent two-component monooxygenases. As has subsequently become evident, both the nature and number of flavin reductases able to supply the requisite reduced flavin co-substrate for the monooxygenases changes progressively throughout the different phases of camphor-dependent growth. Highly purified preparations of the enantiocomplementary monooxygenases have been exploited successfully for undertaking both nucleophilic and electrophilic biooxidations generating various enantiopure lactones and sulfoxides of value as chiral synthons and auxiliaries, respectively. In this review the chequered history, current functional understanding, and scope and value as biocatalysts of the diketocamphane monooxygenases are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop