Search Results (1,005)

Objectives: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remain at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) integrates circulating neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, and lymphocytes but does not capture albumin-related nutritional and inflammatory reserve. We investigated associations between the PIV-to-albumin ratio (PIVA) and incident CVD, cardiovascular mortality, and disease progression in individuals with T2D. Methods: This prospective study included 15,355 UK Biobank participants with T2D and no baseline CVD. PIVA was calculated from peripheral blood cell counts and serum albumin and was natural log-transformed. Fine–Gray competing-risk and cause-specific Cox models were used to evaluate incident CVD and cardiovascular mortality. Multi-state models characterized transitions from T2D to CVD and death. We also examined nonlinear associations, renal biomarker mediation, joint associations with the CVD polygenic risk score and triglyceride–glucose index, sensitivity analyses, and external validation of cardiovascular mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Results: During median follow-ups of 12.94 years for incident CVD and 14.49 years for cardiovascular mortality, 4829 incident CVD events and 514 cardiovascular deaths occurred. Each 1-unit increase in lnPIVA was associated with higher risks of incident CVD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.140; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.088–1.194) and cardiovascular mortality (sHR, 1.449; 95% CI, 1.247–1.684). Associations were nonlinear. Higher lnPIVA was also associated with transitions from T2D to CVD, from T2D directly to cardiovascular death, and from incident CVD to cardiovascular death. Cystatin C explained a larger proportion of these associations than creatinine. Elevated lnPIVA identified excess cardiovascular risk across strata of genetic susceptibility and insulin resistance, and the findings were generally supported by sensitivity and external validation analyses. Conclusions: lnPIVA was associated with incident CVD, cardiovascular mortality, and adverse cardiovascular transitions in individuals with T2D. As an immune-inflammatory and albumin-based index, PIVA may help identify high-risk individuals beyond conventional cardiometabolic and genetic risk profiles. Full article

Background/Objectives: To investigate early treatment outcomes, including tumor response, predictors of response, and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in a multicenter setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 64 Japanese patients with uHCC who received Nivo/Ipi therapy at participating centers between July 2025 and April 2026. Treatment efficacy was assessed according to RECIST version 1.1, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using CTCAE version 5.0. Results: Among the 64 patients, 28 received first-line therapy, and 36 received later-line therapy. The median observation period was 5.4 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the first-line group (60.7%) than in the later-line group (30.6%) (p = 0.016). ORRs according to CRAFITY score were 25.0% for score 0, 55.6% for score 1, and 53.8% for score 2. The ORR in patients with CRAFITY scores ≥ 1 was significantly higher than in patients with a CRAFITY score of 0 (55.0% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.022). Multivariable analysis of pretreatment variables predicting response revealed first-line treatment (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.270–11.558; p = 0.017) and a CRAFITY score ≥ 1 (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.232–13.106; p = 0.021) as significant independent factors. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 70.3% of patients overall and were grade ≥ 3 in 35.9%. Conclusions: Nivo/Ipi yielded a favorable response when used as first-line therapy. The baseline CRAFITY score may be a useful predictor of response to Nivo/Ipi therapy. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: This paper presents a case of Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH)-like disease following nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, complicated by transient type 1 macular neovascularisation (MNV). Case Presentation: A 67-year-old man presented with reduced visual acuity, more pronounced in the left eye, accompanied by headache and neurosensory hearing loss for 10 days. He had been receiving combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab for approximately nine weeks. Slit-lamp examination and multimodal imaging revealed multiple serous retinal detachments, choroidal folds, and bacillary layer detachment. A bilateral VKH-like syndrome was considered the most likely diagnosis, consistent with an immune-related adverse event (irAE). High-dose systemic corticosteroids were initiated, resulting in marked anatomical improvement and recovery of visual acuity. Following multidisciplinary discussion with the patient’s oncologist, ipilimumab was permanently discontinued and nivolumab was rechallenged in combination with chemotherapy after resolution of the ocular adverse events, given the progression of the underlying malignancy. Notably, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) additionally demonstrated a type 1 non-exudative MNV, which resolved spontaneously during follow-up. Conclusions: Nivolumab and ipilimumab, targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, respectively, are effective anticancer therapies but may induce immune-related adverse events involving the eye. VKH-like disease is a rare but potentially vision-threatening complication. Early recognition and prompt treatment are essential for favourable visual outcomes. In summary, this is a rare case of VKH-like disease associated with nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy, complicated by transient inflammatory type 1 MNV. Clear guidelines are needed regarding management of ocular immune-related adverse events and decisions on continuation or discontinuation of life-prolonging immunotherapy. Full article

Background: The interaction between COVID-19 vaccination and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains incompletely characterized. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 139 patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with first-line ICI-based therapy, stratified by vaccination status and total doses received (0–1 vs. ≥2). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression; logistic regression explored factors associated with treatment-related toxicity. Results: Vaccinated patients had longer median PFS (13.0 vs. 11.0 months) and OS (29.0 vs. 24.0 months; both p < 0.001). In multivariable models these associations were attenuated and of borderline significance (OS HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99; PFS HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.62–0.99). Outcomes were also more favorable with ≥2 doses (median PFS 14.0 vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.001; median OS 30.0 vs. 24.0 months, p < 0.001), and tumor mutational status was the strongest independent predictor of survival. In an exploratory model, ≥2 doses were associated with higher odds of any-grade toxicity (OR = 2.47, p = 0.037); events were predominantly low grade, with no Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with improved PFS and OS in stage IV NSCLC receiving first-line ICI therapy, with a dose-related pattern. The association was attenuated after adjustment for tumor biology and is hypothesis-generating. These findings support the safety and potential clinical relevance of vaccination in this population and underline the need for structured monitoring during immunotherapy. Prospective validation is required. Full article

Vaccination ranks among the most consequential interventions in medicine, yet cold-chain dependence, sharps hazards, needle phobia, and reliance on trained vaccinators limit coverage where vaccine-preventable mortality is highest. Microneedle patches deposit antigen into the antigen-presenting-cell-rich epidermis and upper dermis through projections that penetrate the stratum corneum without reaching dermal nociceptors. Such targeting yields immunogenicity matching or exceeding intramuscular injection at a fraction of the antigen mass, with dose-sparing up to six-fold recorded for influenza, polio, and SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Solid-state formulation converts that immunological advantage into a logistical one, since polymeric matrices preserve potency for as long as two years at ambient temperature, removing the refrigeration infrastructure that consumes significant delivery cost. Six microneedle types have reached preclinical or clinical maturity, with dissolving microneedle patches the most advanced. Two trials provide the clinical evidence: a Phase I influenza study showing non-inferior antibody responses and successful self-application, and a Phase I/II measles–rubella trial in The Gambia reaching 93% measles and 100% rubella seroconversion in infants without related serious adverse events. Engineering advances currently include an automated printer producing thermostable mRNA–lipid nanoparticle patches that retain bioactivity for six months at ambient temperature, the first intradermal self-amplifying RNA patch, and quantum-dot on-body immunization records. Sterility assurance, dose uniformity, nucleic acid integrity within solid matrices, and fragmented regulatory guidance remain the challenging obstacles, alongside a clinical pipeline concentrated on few antigens. This review integrates the mechanistic, materials, manufacturing, clinical, regulatory, and global health dimensions of the field to guide translation and equitable deployment. Full article

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved from the metastatic setting into neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and fully perioperative strategies across several solid tumors. This shift has created a new clinical interface between medical oncology, surgery, anesthesia, pathology and postoperative care because immune activation may improve pathological response and survival while also generating immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that mimic or aggravate perioperative complications. Methods: We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for studies published between 2016 and 2026 that evaluated adult patients with solid tumors receiving ICIs in relation to surgery. Thirty-three studies were included and synthesized descriptively across surgical feasibility, perioperative safety, irAEs, anesthetic considerations, and oncological outcomes. Results: The strongest evidence was found in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer, where neoadjuvant or perioperative ICI-based regimens improved pathological response and, in several trials, event-free or overall survival. Evidence in triple-negative breast, bladder, gastric/gastroesophageal junction, and ovarian cancers supported broader applicability but remained heterogeneous, with variable efficacy across tumor types and treatment regimens. Surgery following ICI exposure was generally feasible, without a consistent increase in postoperative mortality. However, pneumonitis, myocarditis, endocrinopathies, hepatitis, colitis, and cytokine release syndrome may mimic conventional postoperative complications. Direct evidence comparing anesthetic or perioperative management strategies was scarce. Conclusions: Perioperative ICI-based therapy is no longer an experimental concept, but its safe implementation requires structured preoperative screening, individualized surgical timing, organ-specific toxicity surveillance, careful corticosteroid decision-making, and close multidisciplinary communication. Future prospective studies should integrate standardized perioperative endpoints, anesthesia-related variables, biomarker-driven risk stratification, and long-term oncological outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies has revolutionized advanced melanoma treatment but introduced unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Hematological irAEs (Hem-irAEs) are rare but carry disproportionately high morbidity and mortality. This review systematically synthesizes current literature to comprehensively understand the incidence, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of Hem-irAEs in modern melanoma therapy. Methods: A comprehensive Web of Science literature search (January 2015 to January 2026) identified studies reporting hematological adverse events associated with melanoma immunotherapy and targeted therapies. After screening 2274 records, 130 relevant studies were included for quantitative data extraction, focusing on incidence rates and toxicity grading. Results: Hem-irAEs occur infrequently (under 4% overall incidence for ICIs) but possess staggering mortality rates between 12% and 15.5%. The most common manifestations are immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and neutropenia. Combination regimens significantly amplify toxicity frequency and severity. Diagnosis requires meticulous baseline monitoring and bone marrow biopsies to differentiate peripheral destruction from central marrow failure. First-line management mandates ICI discontinuation and high-dose corticosteroids, utilizing targeted second-line immunosuppressants for refractory syndromes. Conclusions: Hem-irAEs embody a profound clinical paradox: while mild toxicities often herald a robust anti-tumor response, severe hematological events drastically increase non-cancer mortality, negating these oncological benefits. Navigating this “double-edged sword” demands a paradigm shift toward proactive risk stratification. Integrating predictive biomarkers including baseline autoantibodies, Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) profiling, and systemic inflammatory indices is crucial to identify vulnerable populations before treatment. Optimizing outcomes requires highly personalized vigilance to balance the life-saving efficacy of immunotherapy against the catastrophic threat of hematopoietic failure. Full article

Background: Identifying biomarkers for biological vulnerability in older patients with cancer remains challenging. We evaluated psoas muscle index (PMI) and immunonutritional indices’ association with toxicity and overall survival (OS) in patients ≥ 65 years receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: This retrospective study included 104 patients. Baseline sarcopenia was assessed via CT-derived PMI at the L3 level. Immunonutritional status was evaluated using the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). Primary endpoint was immune-related adverse event (irAE) development; secondary endpoint was OS. Results: Median age was 71 years. Patients developing irAEs had significantly higher baseline PNI than those without (49.0 vs. 46.0, p = 0.042). OS did not differ significantly by irAE status (p = 0.859) or PMI group (p = 0.664). However, low PNI was strongly associated with poorer OS (17.0 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox model stratified by ICI treatment type, higher PNI remained independently associated with better OS (adjusted HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81–0.93, p < 0.001). PNI correlated negatively with inflammatory markers NLR and SII. Conclusions: Baseline PNI was independently associated with OS, whereas PMI was not significantly associated with survival in this cohort. These findings support the potential prognostic utility of PNI in older patients receiving immunotherapy but should not be interpreted as demonstrating superiority over comprehensive sarcopenia assessment. Full article

Background/Objectives: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies has revolutionized advanced cutaneous melanoma care, shifting it from an acutely fatal illness to a chronic, manageable condition. While extending survival, these modern therapies introduce a new spectrum of persistent immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and long-term toxicities. This study aims to explore the “Toxicity-HRQoL Paradox” to comprehensively evaluate the true price of survival across the melanoma treatment continuum. Methods: This narrative review, based on a systematic database search, synthesizes quantitative patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) trajectories, and health-economic data. It evaluates the impact of surgical, regional, and modern systemic therapies utilizing data derived from validated instruments, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M), and comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST). Results: Historically, extensive locoregional surgeries and high-dose interferons caused profound, debilitating drops in physical and overall QoL. Today, modern systemic therapies are associated with high rates of severe (Grade ≥ 3) acute toxicities and irreversible chronic conditions, such as permanent endocrinopathies. Despite this, global HRQoL frequently remains stable or even improves. This “toxicity-HRQoL paradox” occurs because the profound psychological relief of durable disease control effectively offsets the physical symptom burden. Furthermore, neoadjuvant ICI approaches demonstrate superior long-term HRQoL by enabling tailored surgical de-escalation. Ultimately, extended survivorship unmasks hidden burdens, revealing high prevalences of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) (81–86%) and substantial financial toxicity. Conclusions: Despite the severe physical toxicities of modern melanoma treatments, the psychological benefit of survival largely preserves overall HRQoL. However, optimizing the modern survivorship experience requires the widespread adoption of melanoma-specific HRQoL tools and proactive, multidisciplinary care models to manage chronic toxicities, psychosocial distress, and financial burdens. Full article

Over the last decade, immunotherapy has transformed oncology, with an ever-expanding list of indications. As with any therapeutic class, these agents are accompanied by adverse events that are increasingly recognized and pose new challenges for patient care expanding the scope of cardio-oncology. Using the PubMed database, this narrative review summarizes the cardiovascular adverse events associated with the most commonly used immunotherapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with a focus on the mechanisms, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of ICI-associated myocarditis. We also review accelerated atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathy (including stress-induced cardiomyopathy), arrhythmias, and pericardial disease related to ICI therapy. Finally, we outline CAR T-cell therapy associated cardiotoxicity, including cytokine release syndrome. Full article

Background: Based on the demonstrated survival benefits of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) therapy in the TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials, GemCis plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has become a standard first-line treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer. However, its safety and efficacy in elderly patients and those requiring biliary drainage remain insufficiently evaluated in real-world practice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GemCis plus ICI therapy, with a focus on elderly patients and those requiring biliary drainage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer treated with GemCis plus ICI at our institution between April 2022 and September 2025. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. PFS and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between durvalumab and pembrolizumab. Results: Of the 51 patients diagnosed with unresectable biliary tract cancer during the observation period, 26 (51.0%) received GemCis plus ICI therapy. The median age was 73 years (range, 46–83 years), and 15 (57.7%) patients were male. Distant metastases were present in 22 patients (84.6%), and biliary drainage was performed in 15 (57.7%). The primary tumor sites were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 8), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), gallbladder cancer (n = 11), and cancer of unknown primary origin (n = 1). The ICIs used were durvalumab in 18 patients and pembrolizumab in eight patients. The median follow-up period was 214 days (range, 30–1114). The response rate was 28.6%, the disease control rate was 90.5%, and the transition rate to ICI maintenance therapy was 29.2%. IrAEs occurred in six patients (23.1%), with a significantly higher frequency in the pembrolizumab group than in the durvalumab group (50.0% vs. 11.1%). The median PFS was 8.2 months in the durvalumab group and 8.9 months in the pembrolizumab group, with no significant difference (p = 0.88). Multivariate analysis incorporating age, performance status, metastatic burden, and liver function confirmed that age ≥ 75 years remained the only independent predictor of shorter PFS (HR 5.62; 95% CI, 1.35–23.4; p = 0.02), whereas ICI regimen and biliary drainage were not significant prognostic factors. Conclusions: In clinical practice, GemCis plus ICI therapy showed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between ICI regimens in this small cohort, although this comparison was not statistically powered. Given the exploratory nature of these findings, the lower incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) observed in the durvalumab group should be interpreted with caution. Age ≥ 75 years was associated with shorter PFS. Careful patient selection is warranted when considering GemCis plus ICI therapy in elderly patients with biliary tract cancer. Full article

Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a complex autoimmune disease demonstrating substantial heterogeneity in age of onset, residual C-peptide levels, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic response. Although the autoimmune classification of T1D has traditionally relied on detection of autoantibodies indicating B-cell involvement, studies targeting total CD3⁺ T cells have underscored the importance of T-cell regulation. Th40 cells, a pathogenic subset of CD3⁺ T cells, first identified in NOD mice, become significantly increased during diabetogenesis. Human subjects with T1D exhibit variable but significantly elevated Th40 levels in peripheral blood. Methods: To target pathogenic effector Th40 cells, we developed OPT101, a 15-mer peptide, and found that it interacts with CD40 in association with an activated integrin, identifying a novel inflammatory receptor complex. We conducted a phase 1b, double-blind, first-in-human clinical trial to evaluate OPT101 and met the primary objectives of safety and tolerability. Results: OPT101 generated only Grade 1 and 2 adverse events. Across eight doses, administered over six weeks, no product-related immune suppression was observed. Secondary objectives included immunologic outcomes and potential efficacy. Subjects with higher Th40 levels had low or undetectable C-peptide, higher (>7.0%) HbA1c, and elevated inflammatory cytokines. Th40 levels were significantly higher in subjects diagnosed before age eighteen. OPT101 treatment significantly reduced Th40 percentages without cell ablation, increased Treg levels, and decreased inflammatory cytokines. Serum blood glucose levels and HbA1c were significantly reduced by visit 8 in treated subjects. In two subjects, 11 and 13 years post-diagnosis, with undetectable C-peptide at screening, C-peptide became detectable post-treatment. Conclusions: OPT101 proved safe and effective in human T1D subjects with only mild and a few moderate adverse events. In this short-term study, OPT101 improved beta cell functions thus warranting further exploration. Full article

Background/Objectives: Teclistamab is a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed bispecific antibody approved for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Although prior analyses have summarized teclistamab outcomes, some have included combination regimens or broader comparative studies. Given the expanding real-world experience with teclistamab, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis focused on teclistamab monotherapy in RRMM. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and retrospective real-world studies evaluating teclistamab monotherapy in RRMM. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR), overall mortality rate (OMR), mortality due to multiple myeloma progression, teclistamab-attributed mortality, adverse event-related mortality, grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and other grade ≥3 adverse events. Pooled proportions were estimated using random-effects models. Results: Twelve studies including 761 patients were analyzed, comprising two clinical trials and ten real-world retrospective cohorts. The pooled ORR was 60.9%, and the pooled CR rate was 25.2%. The pooled OMR was 26.9%, with mortality due to myeloma progression of 23.9%, adverse event-related mortality of 8.1%, and teclistamab-attributed mortality of 3.3%. Severe (grade ≥3) CRS and ICANS were uncommon, with grade ≥3 events occurring in 1.7% and 3.1%, respectively. Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 28.3%. Common grade ≥3 hematologic adverse events included lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Teclistamab monotherapy demonstrates meaningful clinical activity and a manageable immune toxicity profile in heavily pretreated RRMM. However, severe infections and hematologic toxicities remain important clinical considerations, supporting the need for close monitoring, infection prevention, and supportive care during therapy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) are among the most common toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies and can significantly affect quality of life, treatment adherence, and therapeutic outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an updated overview of the mechanisms, clinical manifestations, prognostic implications, and management strategies of cancer therapy-related cutaneous toxicities, with a particular focus on precision oncodermatology. Methods: A narrative review of the recent literature was performed, integrating evidence from clinical studies, meta-analyses, pharmacovigilance investigations, consensus guidelines, and translational research. The review examines cutaneous toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, antibody–drug conjugates, and other emerging anticancer treatments. Results: Four major axes were identified: immune disinhibition, epithelial signaling inhibition, cytotoxic epithelial injury, and cytokine-driven immune activation. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) emerged as potential biomarkers of treatment efficacy, particularly vitiligo, lichenoid, and psoriasiform eruptions. Increasing evidence supports the use of steroid-sparing biologic therapies, including dupilumab, omalizumab, anti-IL-17 agents, and Janus kinase inhibitors, although prospective validation remains limited. Recent advances in immunologic endotyping have identified distinct inflammatory pathways that may enable personalized therapeutic approaches. Antibody–drug conjugates represent an expanding source of unique dermatologic toxicities requiring dedicated management strategies. Emerging biomarkers, including cytokine signatures and microRNAs, may further refine risk stratification and treatment selection. Conclusions: The management of cancer therapy-related cutaneous toxicities is evolving toward a precision medicine model integrating clinical phenotype, immunologic endotype, and biomarker profiling. Early multidisciplinary intervention and mechanism-based therapeutic strategies may improve patient outcomes while preserving anticancer efficacy. Prospective studies are needed to validate biomarker-guided and steroid-sparing approaches in oncodermatology. Full article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment of multiple malignancies by restoring antitumor T-cell activity. Their clinical identity is therefore that of immune-enhancing therapies. However, the biology of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is more complex than simple immune inhibition. Human inborn errors of PD-1 or PD-L1 signaling indicate that this pathway contributes to immune homeostasis, tolerance, protection against selected infections, and the development of memory B cells and antibody responses. These observations raise an important translational question: Can prolonged pharmacologic blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 can, in selected clinical contexts, induce or reveal acquired humoral immune dysfunction? This review synthesizes evidence linking PD-1/PD-L1 disruption to altered class-switched memory B-cell biology, antibody responses, vaccine immunogenicity, infection susceptibility, and secondary antibody deficiency. It also incorporates emerging evidence that checkpoint blockade may expand age-associated B cells, a population associated with impaired neutralizing antibody responses after vaccination, and counterbalances evidence that vaccination during ICI therapy may enhance antitumor immunity and survival. Current clinical evidence does not establish the incidence, prevalence, reversibility, dose dependence, or causality of an ICI-induced antibody-deficiency syndrome. Instead, the available data support a hypothesis-generating model of heterogeneous humoral remodeling, ranging from preserved or enhanced vaccine-associated immune activation to qualitative antibody failure and secondary antibody deficiency in susceptible patients. Future studies should incorporate baseline and longitudinal measurements of immunoglobulins, vaccine-specific and neutralizing antibodies, class-switched memory B cells, age-associated B cells, plasmablasts, infection burden, and exposure to immunosuppressive treatment. Full article