Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (159)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = intra-abdominal infection

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 3547 KB  
Systematic Review
Robotic Omental Flap Harvest for Complex Thoracic Defects: Case Series and Review of the Literature
by Susana Fortich, Camila Franco-Mesa, Jennifer Den, Gabriel De La Cruz Ku, Gal Levy and Roman Petrov
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(4), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13040264 - 12 Nov 2025
Abstract
Objective: The omentum is a highly vascularized and immunologically active tissue with significant regenerative potential. Despite its versatility, its use has traditionally been limited to intra-abdominal applications due to access challenges. Conventional open harvest requires laparotomy, and laparoscopic techniques are hindered by limited [...] Read more.
Objective: The omentum is a highly vascularized and immunologically active tissue with significant regenerative potential. Despite its versatility, its use has traditionally been limited to intra-abdominal applications due to access challenges. Conventional open harvest requires laparotomy, and laparoscopic techniques are hindered by limited visualization and poor ergonomics. We describe the use of robotic-assisted omental flap harvest for thoracic reconstruction, offering a minimally invasive alternative. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent robotic omental flap harvest for intrathoracic reconstruction at a single-center institution between January 2023 and January 2024. Data collected included demographics, indications, surgical technique, operative details, and postoperative outcomes, with a focus on flap viability and complications. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate current evidence and experiences with this type of technique. Results: Three patients underwent robotic omental flap harvest for indications including chest wall reconstruction and pleural space obliteration in infected thoracic cavities. The average robotic flap harvest time was 79 ± 13 min, with an estimated ± blood loss of 20 cc. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 10 days, influenced by the primary procedure and patient comorbidities. At an average follow-up of 8 months, all flaps remained viable, with no flap-related complications or losses. The systematic review demonstrated limited data in the current literature regarding this type of surgical approach. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted omental flap harvest is a safe, feasible, and effective technique for complex thoracic reconstructions. It provides a minimally invasive alternative to traditional harvest methods, with reduced morbidity and excellent clinical outcomes. This technique expands the reconstructive options for intrathoracic defects and infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pneumology and Respiratory Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 311 KB  
Review
Antibiotics for Intra-Abdominal Infections: When, Which, How and How Long?
by Massimo Sartelli, Miriam Palmieri and Francesco M. Labricciosa
Antibiotics 2025, 14(11), 1127; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14111127 - 7 Nov 2025
Viewed by 448
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remain among the most challenging problems in surgical clinical practice. They range from uncomplicated appendicitis to life-threatening peritonitis, demanding rapid diagnosis, timely source control, and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Antibiotics are crucial to manage patients with complicated IAIs. Antibiotics should always [...] Read more.
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remain among the most challenging problems in surgical clinical practice. They range from uncomplicated appendicitis to life-threatening peritonitis, demanding rapid diagnosis, timely source control, and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Antibiotics are crucial to manage patients with complicated IAIs. Antibiotics should always be prescribed appropriately, ensuring the correct spectrum, timing, duration, and dosage. Appropriate prescribing within hospitals enhances treatment success and patient safety, while also reducing the risk of opportunistic infections such as Clostridioides difficile and lowering the likelihood of selecting resistant pathogens. Over recent decades, antimicrobial resistance has escalated into a worldwide public health threat. The rapid rise in multidrug-resistant organisms, especially Gram-negative bacteria, has created a pressing global concern. The objective of this narrative review is to describe (a) when antibiotics should be used in patients with IAIs; (b) which antibiotics should be selected in patients with IAIs; (c) how they should be managed in patients with IAIs; and (d) how long they should be administered in patients with IAIs. Full article
17 pages, 275 KB  
Review
Ceftazidime/Avibactam Monotherapy Versus Other Antibiotics: Where Do We Stand?
by Georgios Vougiouklakis, Constantinos Tsioutis, Nayia Vasileiadi, Konstantinos Alexakis, Nikolaos Spernovasilis and Aris P. Agouridis
Pathogens 2025, 14(11), 1119; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14111119 - 3 Nov 2025
Viewed by 548
Abstract
The global rise of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens, including the widespread resistance to beta-lactams through the production of β-lactamases, like extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), has led to the increasing use of last-line antibiotics such as carbapenems. Subsequently, the worldwide emergence of carbapenemase-producing pathogens [...] Read more.
The global rise of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens, including the widespread resistance to beta-lactams through the production of β-lactamases, like extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), has led to the increasing use of last-line antibiotics such as carbapenems. Subsequently, the worldwide emergence of carbapenemase-producing pathogens poses a formidable challenge. The combination ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) has emerged as a pivotal agent in the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. Avibactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, demonstrates a wider spectrum of activity against Ambler Class A, C, and partially D β-lactamases in comparison to older inhibitors, thus enhancing the antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime against organisms producing ESBL and carbapenemases, such as oxacillinase (OXA)-type and Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC). This review synthesizes findings from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, evaluating the efficacy of CAZ/AVI across diverse clinical settings, including complicated intra-abdominal infections, urinary tract infections, nosocomial pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, and bloodstream infections. The non-inferiority of CAZ-AVI with respect to carbapenems and superiority over polymyxins in terms of both clinical outcomes and safety are outlined, along with evidence supporting the use of CAZ/AVI in high-risk populations such as immunocompromised and critically ill patients. Overall, CAZ/AVI represents a compelling therapeutic option with favorable efficacy and safety, thus appearing as a reasonable frontline treatment for resistant Gram-negative infections. Full article
12 pages, 219 KB  
Article
Fosfomycin in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in an Intensive Care Setting: Does It Improve the Outcome? A Retrospective Observational Study
by Giovanni Genga, Federico Ragni, Maria Carolina Benvenuto, Elisabetta Svizzeretto, Andrea Tommasi, Giuseppe Vittorio Luigi De Socio, Daniela Francisci and Carlo Pallotto
Antibiotics 2025, 14(11), 1104; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14111104 - 2 Nov 2025
Viewed by 261
Abstract
Background: Intra-abdominal infection (IAI) is a challenging condition that needs both medical and surgical treatment and it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Fosfomycin is approved for use in combination therapy for IAIs. The aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Background: Intra-abdominal infection (IAI) is a challenging condition that needs both medical and surgical treatment and it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Fosfomycin is approved for use in combination therapy for IAIs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous fosfomycin addition in a combination regimen for IAI treatment in an intensive care setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational, monocentric study. We enrolled patients admitted to the ICU with IAIs from April 2022 to June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A, standard treatment; and Group B, combination therapy including fosfomycin. Primary endpoints were clinical response at 7 days and in-hospital mortality; moreover, a risk factor analysis for mortality was also performed. Results: In total, 104 patients were enrolled, 85 in Group A, and 19 in Group B. Groups were homogenous in regard to demographics, but clinical condition was slightly worst in Group B. Source control < 24 h was performed in 69.6% and 33.3% cases in Group A and Group B, respectively (p = 0.017). Clinical response on day 7 (81.2% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.675) and in-hospital mortality (27.1% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.145) were comparable. Univariate and multivariate analysis highlighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (p = 0.04) and septic shock (p = 0.029) as risk factors, and effective empirical therapy (p = 0.04) as the protective factor; fosfomycin was not directly associated with outcome improvement. Conclusions: The outcome was comparable between groups; clinicians preferred to administer a combination regimen including fosfomycin in patients with statistically significant greater severity of illness and without early source control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Treatment on Surgical Infections)
21 pages, 680 KB  
Review
Personalized Approaches to Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infections
by Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Francesco M. Labricciosa, Walter Siquini, Giuseppe Pipitone, Miriam Palmieri, Valentina Sbacco, Carlo Vallicelli, Cristina Marmorale and Fausto Catena
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(21), 7774; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217774 - 1 Nov 2025
Viewed by 715
Abstract
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The optimal management of patients with IAIs relies on early and accurate diagnosis, prompt and adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on the PK/PD principles, as well as [...] Read more.
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The optimal management of patients with IAIs relies on early and accurate diagnosis, prompt and adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on the PK/PD principles, as well as hemodynamic support with intravenous fluids and vasopressors in critically ill patients. This narrative review aims to suggest five basic factors which should always be considered when assessing patients with IAIs to provide the most adequate treatment. These factors include the anatomical extent of the infection, the origin of the infection, the patient’s clinical status, the suspected pathogens and their resistance profiles, and immune competence. The continuous assessment of these elements is essential in managing complicated IAIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sepsis: New Insights into Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1560 KB  
Article
Ceftazidime–Avibactam Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes
by Ayten Yanık and Ömer Karaşahin
Antibiotics 2025, 14(11), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14111085 - 28 Oct 2025
Viewed by 569
Abstract
Background/Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteremia is a serious public health problem due to its high mortality rate and limited treatment options. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) resistance in CRKP bacteremia and to evaluate its impact on [...] Read more.
Background/Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteremia is a serious public health problem due to its high mortality rate and limited treatment options. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) resistance in CRKP bacteremia and to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included adult patients with CRKP bloodstream infections treated at a tertiary hospital in Türkiye between January 2021 and December 2024. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and risk factors for CAZ-AVI resistance and 30-day mortality were analyzed. Results: Among 154 patients, 42.8% had CAZ-AVI-resistant strains. Resistant infections were associated with longer hospital stays and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. The resistance rate was lower in patients with intra-abdominal infections, while fluoroquinolone and fosfomycin use was more common in the resistant group. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 57%. Pitt bacteremia score and creatinine levels were identified as independent predictors of mortality. Discussion: CAZ-AVI resistance in CRKP bacteremia appears to develop in patients with prolonged hospitalization and high comorbidity burden. These factors likely increase exposure to resistant microorganisms and antibiotic pressure, complicating treatment outcomes. Conclusions: CAZ-AVI resistance in CRKP bacteremia is associated with specific clinical risk profiles and contributes to high mortality. Identifying high-risk patients and optimizing antimicrobial stewardship are essential to improve prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 916 KB  
Review
A Focus on Inflammatory and Bacterial Biomarkers in Secondary Peritonitis
by Valentino Bezzerri, Lorenza Putignani, Elisabetta Mantuano, Alessandro Polini, Luca Navarini, Marta Vomero, Erika Corberi, Valentina Miacci, Paula Elena Papuc, Vincenzo Schiavone and Gianluca Costa
Cells 2025, 14(21), 1653; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14211653 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 491
Abstract
Secondary peritonitis is a life-threatening intra-abdominal condition arising from gastrointestinal perforation, chemical injury, or catheter-related infections, characterized by marked heterogeneity in presentation and progression. Major subtypes include stercoraceous peritonitis with fecal contamination, fibrinous peritonitis triggered by bile or gastric contents, peritoneal dialysis-associated infections, [...] Read more.
Secondary peritonitis is a life-threatening intra-abdominal condition arising from gastrointestinal perforation, chemical injury, or catheter-related infections, characterized by marked heterogeneity in presentation and progression. Major subtypes include stercoraceous peritonitis with fecal contamination, fibrinous peritonitis triggered by bile or gastric contents, peritoneal dialysis-associated infections, and pancreatitis-associated chemical peritonitis. Regardless of etiology, these conditions share profound local and systemic inflammatory responses, contributing to high morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), C-reactive protein (CRP), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) have emerged as tools for early diagnosis, subtype stratification, and monitoring of therapeutic response. Their prognostic value is particularly relevant in peritoneal dialysis and postoperative intensive care. Advances in multi-omics, patient-derived organoids, peritoneum-on-chip models, and microbiota profiling are reshaping understanding of peritoneal pathophysiology, revealing cellular heterogeneity, immune-microenvironment interactions, and mechanisms of fibrotic remodeling. Key translational challenges include assessing whether omics-derived signatures can predict the need for early re-laparotomy or the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome. Integration of high-dimensional biomarker profiling with mechanistic and functional studies promises a new era of precision medicine in secondary peritonitis, enabling risk-adapted interventions, complication prevention, and tailored strategies to improve outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 325 KB  
Review
Polymicrobial Infections: A Comprehensive Review on Current Context, Diagnostic Bottlenecks and Future Directions
by Amit Patnaik, Titirsha Kayal and Soumya Basu
Acta Microbiol. Hell. 2025, 70(4), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/amh70040039 - 14 Oct 2025
Viewed by 718
Abstract
Worldwide, polymicrobial infections (PMIs) account for an estimated 20–50% of severe clinical infection cases, with biofilm-associated and device-related infections reaching 60–80% in hospitalized patients. This review discusses the clinical burden of major infections in which PMIs are almost inevitable, such as diabetic foot [...] Read more.
Worldwide, polymicrobial infections (PMIs) account for an estimated 20–50% of severe clinical infection cases, with biofilm-associated and device-related infections reaching 60–80% in hospitalized patients. This review discusses the clinical burden of major infections in which PMIs are almost inevitable, such as diabetic foot infections, intra-abdominal infections, pneumonia, and biofilm-associated device infections. Globally, the PMI landscape is diverse; however, the Indian subcontinent is a PMI hotspot where high comorbidities, endemic antimicrobial resistance, and underdeveloped diagnostic capacity elevate the risks of poor outcomes. Existing diagnostic like culture-based methods, PCR panels, sequencing, and biomarker-based assays are constrained by sensitivity, turnaround times (TATs), and high costs. Vulnerable populations, particularly neonates, the elderly, immunocompromised patients, and socioeconomically marginalized groups, show case-fatality rates 2-fold higher than monomicrobial infections in similar settings. Emerging diagnostic solutions include CRISPR-based multiplex assays, artificial intelligence-based metagenomic platforms, and sensitive biosensors with point-of-care applicability. These technologies show potential in reducing the TAT (<2 h) with high accuracy (>95%). However, their translation to real-world settings depends critically on affordability, integration into healthcare pathways, and supportive policy. This will provide equitable diagnostic access, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Full article
30 pages, 3328 KB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preoperative Biliary Drainage Methods in Periampullary Tumors
by Septimiu Alex Moldovan, Emil Ioan Moiș, Florin Graur, Ion Cosmin Puia, Iulia Vlad, Vlad Ionuț Nechita, Luminiţa Furcea, Florin Zaharie, Călin Popa, Daniel Corneliu Leucuța, Simona Mirel, Mihaela Ştefana Moldovan, Tudor Mocan, Andrada Seicean, Andra Ciocan and Nadim Al Hajjar
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 7097; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197097 - 8 Oct 2025
Viewed by 961
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic and hepatobiliary tumors continue to rank among the deadliest cancers worldwide. Due to a low response rate to treatment, these tumors continue to have a high death rate, a poor prognosis and survival rate, and an overall poor patient outcome. [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic and hepatobiliary tumors continue to rank among the deadliest cancers worldwide. Due to a low response rate to treatment, these tumors continue to have a high death rate, a poor prognosis and survival rate, and an overall poor patient outcome. The multimodal strategy used in current treatment includes systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. However, surgery remains the only treatment with curative intent. Preoperative biliary drainage has a direct impact on the perioperative prognosis of patients with obstructive jaundice and significantly compromised liver function due to hepato-bilio-pancreatic malignancies. Our study’s goal was to determine the safest and most efficient preoperative biliary drainage technique by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of resectable periampullary cancers. Methods: Our approach consisted of searching PubMed, BMC Medicine, and Scopus databases using keywords with a result of 1104 articles from 2010 to 2023. The remaining 24 articles that met our inclusion criteria were subjected to meta-analysis using R Commander 4.3.2. Results: Endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) demonstrated a higher rate of postprocedural pancreatitis (RR = 2.22, p < 0.01), intra-abdominal abscess (RR = 1.64, p < 0.01), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (RR = 2.07, p < 0.01) than percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD). Plastic stent (PS) had higher rates of catheter occlusion (RR = 2.20, p < 0.01) and POPF (RR = 1.66, p < 0.01) compared to self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), which could explain a longer hospital stay (MD = 2.41 days, p < 0.01). However, PS had lower rates of grade 1–2 complications (RR = 0.79, p = 0.017) and wound infection rates (RR = 0.66, p = 0.017) than self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS). Conclusions: The choice of a preoperative drainage method can influence postprocedural and postoperative complications rates. ERBD appears to be associated with higher procedure-related and postoperative complication rates and may be linked to a prolonged hospital stay compared to ENBD or PTBD. Moreover, the type of stent placed through ERBD procedure had an important impact on prognosis, as PS had a higher rate of catheter occlusion and POPF, with a prolonged hospital stay compared to SEMS, while mild complications and wound infections were less common in PS group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1217 KB  
Article
Pylephlebitis: A Rare but Redoubtable Complication of Intra-Abdominal Infections—A Series of 15 Cases
by Serban Nicolae Benea, Teodora Deaconu, Dragos Florea, Ruxandra Moroti, Gabriela Oprica, Alina Nae, Raluca Elena Patrascu, Eliza Militaru, Habip Gedik and Ilinca Savulescu-Fiedler
Life 2025, 15(10), 1525; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15101525 - 26 Sep 2025
Viewed by 678
Abstract
Pylephlebitis is the suppurative thrombosis of the portal vein system. Mainly reported as a severe complication of diverticulitis or appendicitis, it is an uncommon intra-abdominal infection: approximately 200 cases have been reported in the English literature, mostly from surgical wards. Our study aims [...] Read more.
Pylephlebitis is the suppurative thrombosis of the portal vein system. Mainly reported as a severe complication of diverticulitis or appendicitis, it is an uncommon intra-abdominal infection: approximately 200 cases have been reported in the English literature, mostly from surgical wards. Our study aims to assess the role of an infectious disease setting in managing pylephlebitis. We reviewed medical records from 2001 to 2024 at a tertiary infectious diseases hospital and identified 15 cases. The median age was 58 years [IQR = 28], with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1. Along with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), liver abscess(es) was/were the main radiological finding (n = 12), representing 80% of cases. The liver abscesses appear as secondary events in the case of pylephlebitis. In seven of 15 cases, we found the primary event associated with pylephlebitis. Blood cultures were positive in eight cases, with Gram-negative aerobic bacteria being commonly isolated (n = 5), followed by anaerobes (n = 3); in half of the cases, more than one pathogen was involved. All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics containing beta-lactams, including eight who received carbapenems. Anticoagulation therapy was used in 14 cases. Two deaths were recorded, and four patients required surgical intervention, highlighting the importance of prompt diagnosis and swift antibiotic and anticoagulant treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Microbial Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1658 KB  
Article
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Colonisation in the Patients of a Regional Spinal Cord Injury Unit in Northwest England, United Kingdom: Our Experience with Non-Isolation of VRE Colonised Patients
by Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Bakulesh Madhusudan Soni, Gareth Derick Cummings, Sandra Croston, Kim Lucey, Ruth Hilton and Rachel Hincks
Microorganisms 2025, 13(10), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13102257 - 26 Sep 2025
Viewed by 420
Abstract
We reviewed vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonisation of inpatients of a spinal cord injury centre. The centre consists of one single occupancy en suite room and ten multi-occupancy rooms where two to six patients stay in a cubicle. These patients share bathroom and toilet [...] Read more.
We reviewed vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonisation of inpatients of a spinal cord injury centre. The centre consists of one single occupancy en suite room and ten multi-occupancy rooms where two to six patients stay in a cubicle. These patients share bathroom and toilet facilities. Active screening for VRE is performed by taking rectal swabs on admission of patients to the spinal unit. The patients, who are colonised with VRE, are not isolated due to constraints in resources. During a twelve-month period (April 2024 to April 2025), 33 patients tested positive for VRE. In April 2025, 17 of 40 in-patients tested positive for VRE. During the last six 12-month periods from 2019, the number of patients testing positive for VRE has shown an upward trend from 18 during 2019–2020 to 33 during 2024–2025. No patient developed systemic infection with VRE (blood stream infection, endocarditis, meningitis, intra-abdominal sepsis, infection of a spinal implant or baclofen pump) during the study period. Twelve patients underwent implantation of a baclofen pump during 2024–2025. No patient developed VRE infection from the implant. We believe that non-isolation of patients colonised with VRE may be a pragmatic approach in a resource-poor healthcare facility. It is possible that non-isolation could have contributed to an increase in the number of patients who became colonised with VRE. Attention should be paid to infection prevention measures including hand washing and environmental cleaning to prevent the spread of VRE colonisation of inpatients and VRE infection of at-risk patients, e.g., immune-compromised individuals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Relevant Clinical Infections: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 538 KB  
Review
Postoperative Infections After Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: The Surgeon’s Checklist
by Martina Leandri, Carlo Vallicelli, Giorgia Santandrea, Daniele Perrina, Francesca Bravi, Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Vanni Agnoletti and Fausto Catena
Antibiotics 2025, 14(9), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090954 - 20 Sep 2025
Viewed by 3268
Abstract
Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical emergencies, with a lifetime incidence of approximately 7–8% in the USA and Europe. Despite the widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach and advances made in perioperative care, post-operative infections—particularly intra-abdominal abscesses—continue to pose a [...] Read more.
Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical emergencies, with a lifetime incidence of approximately 7–8% in the USA and Europe. Despite the widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach and advances made in perioperative care, post-operative infections—particularly intra-abdominal abscesses—continue to pose a substantial clinical challenge, with an overall probability that ranges from 5 to 15%. Nowadays, it is essential not only to improve patient outcomes by reducing these complications but also to promote responsible antibiotic use. This review provides an in-depth examination of post-appendectomy infections in adults, synthesizing research from the past decade. It explores the various risks involved, including those related to the patient, the disease itself, and the surgical techniques employed. There is particular emphasis on the impact of surgical approach, closure methods, timing of surgery, and intraoperative decisions such as drain placement, peritoneal lavage, and routine bacterial cultures. Part of the discussion is about emerging data regarding the use of antiseptic solutions and specimen retrieval techniques. Additionally, the review examines current approaches to managing postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses. It assesses when antibiotics are necessary, evaluates image-guided percutaneous drainage, and considers laparoscopic re-intervention as a possible solution. While recent studies offer valuable insights, the heterogeneity of available evidence highlights the pressing need for high-quality, standardized research. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of infection pathways and preventative strategies is vital—not only for reducing morbidity and hospital readmissions, but also for safeguarding the long-term efficacy of antibiotics and delivering safer, more effective surgical care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 594 KB  
Article
Nanopore 16S-Full Length and ITS Sequencing for Microbiota Identification in Intra-Abdominal Infections
by Jian-Jhou Liao, Yong-Sian Chen, Hui-Chen Lin, Yi-Ju Chen, Kuo-Lung Lai, Yan-Chiao Mao, Po-Yu Liu and Han-Ni Chuang
Diagnostics 2025, 15(17), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172257 - 6 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 776
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) constitute significant clinical challenges that can rapidly progress to life-threatening conditions if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Traditional pathogen identification methodologies, predominantly culture-based, frequently necessitate extended turnaround times (TATs) and exhibit limitations in detecting polymicrobial or anaerobic infections. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) constitute significant clinical challenges that can rapidly progress to life-threatening conditions if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Traditional pathogen identification methodologies, predominantly culture-based, frequently necessitate extended turnaround times (TATs) and exhibit limitations in detecting polymicrobial or anaerobic infections. Methods: We implemented Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing to analyze the microbiota in patients with IAIs at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. The study cohort comprised sixteen patients with IAIs. Following specimen collection, DNA extraction was performed, and then full-length 16S rRNA and ITS region amplification and subsequent ONT sequencing were conducted. Results: Conventional clinical culture-based methodologies detected pathogens in 13 patients. Among the 14 successfully sequenced specimens, ONT sequencing elucidated a diverse spectrum of bacteria and fungi, with read counts ranging from 375 to 19,716. Polymicrobial and anaerobe-enriched communities were predominantly observed in lower gastrointestinal tract infections, specifically colonic or small bowel perforations, whereas upper gastrointestinal perforations, including those of the stomach or duodenum, were frequently dominated by Streptococcus, Granulicatella, or Candida species. The sequencing identified pathogens concordant with culture results, including Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Candida albicans. In addition, anaerobic or low-abundance taxa were exclusively identifiable through sequencing methodologies. Conclusions: ONT sequencing facilitated results within up to 24 h and successfully detected pathogens in culture-negative cases. These findings underscore the utility of ONT sequencing as an expeditious and comprehensive diagnostic modality for IAIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 744 KB  
Review
Temocillin: A Narrative Review of Its Clinical Reappraisal
by Lavinia Cosimi, Verena Zerbato, Nina Grasselli Kmet, Alessandra Oliva, Francesco Cogliati Dezza, Nicholas Geremia, Dario Cattaneo, Kristina Nadrah, Mateja Pirs, Rajko Saletinger, Alessio Nunnari, Filippo Mearelli, Filippo Giorgio Di Girolamo, Graziana Avena, Roberta Russo, Carolina Fabiani, Sergio Venturini, Luigi Principe, Giovanna Maria Nicolò and Stefano Di Bella
Antibiotics 2025, 14(9), 859; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090859 - 26 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2379
Abstract
Background: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, particularly extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, has brought renewed interest in temocillin, a narrow-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic first introduced in the 1980s. Objectives: We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiological, pharmacological, and [...] Read more.
Background: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, particularly extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, has brought renewed interest in temocillin, a narrow-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic first introduced in the 1980s. Objectives: We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the microbiological, pharmacological, and clinical profile of temocillin. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature using the PubMed database to identify relevant studies concerning the microbiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical applications, and safety of temocillin. Results: Temocillin shows strong in vitro activity against ESBL- and AmpC-producing organisms, and partial efficacy against certain Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing strains. Its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, including β-lactamase stability and low ecological impact, support its use in urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, intra-abdominal infections, pneumonia, and central nervous system infections. Additionally, evidence supports its utility in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), including subcutaneous administration, and in vulnerable populations such as pediatric, elderly, and immunocompromised patients. Temocillin demonstrates a favorable safety profile, minimal disruption of gut microbiota, and cost-effectiveness. It also exhibits synergistic activity with agents like fosfomycin, further enhancing its clinical value. Most of the current evidence is derived from retrospective and observational studies. Conclusions: Temocillin emerges as a promising carbapenem-sparing option for the treatment of challenging infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1446 KB  
Article
Real-World Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Seven-Year Single-Center Cohort Study from Taiwan
by Wei-Hung Chang, Ting-Yu Hu and Li-Kuo Kuo
Life 2025, 15(8), 1317; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15081317 - 20 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1374
Abstract
Background: Severe sepsis and septic shock remain major contributors to ICU mortality. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been widely adopted as adjunctive therapy in Asian ICUs for endotoxemia, but its real-world effectiveness and prognostic factors remain uncertain, especially in high Gram-negative settings. [...] Read more.
Background: Severe sepsis and septic shock remain major contributors to ICU mortality. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been widely adopted as adjunctive therapy in Asian ICUs for endotoxemia, but its real-world effectiveness and prognostic factors remain uncertain, especially in high Gram-negative settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 64 adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who received at least one session of PMX-HP in a 25-bed tertiary medical ICU in Taiwan between July 2013 and December 2019. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and treatment data were extracted. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Prognostic factors were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: The mean age was 66.1 ± 12.3 years; 67.2% were male. Pneumonia (29.7%) and intra-abdominal infection (18.8%) were the most common sources of sepsis, with E. coli and K. pneumoniae as leading pathogens. Median APACHE II score at ICU admission was 26 (IQR 21–32), and 79.7% received two PMX-HP sessions. The 28-day mortality rate was 46.9%, with ICU and hospital mortality both 53.1%. Non-survivors were older, had higher APACHE II scores, and more frequent use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Positive changes in vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) after PMX-HP were also more common among non-survivors. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age, higher APACHE II score, and CRRT requirement as independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: In this real-world Asian ICU cohort, PMX-HP was used mainly for severe cases with a high disease burden and Gram-negative predominance. Despite its frequent use, overall mortality remained high. Prognosis was primarily determined by underlying disease severity, organ dysfunction (especially renal failure), and persistent hemodynamic instability. In this high-severity cohort, mortality appeared to be primarily driven by baseline organ dysfunction and persistent hemodynamic instability; PMX-HP session number or sequencing showed no association with survival. Given the absence of a contemporaneous non-PMX-HP control group, mortality observations in this cohort cannot be causally attributed to PMX-HP and should be interpreted with caution as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive evidence of efficacy. Further multicenter studies are needed to clarify the optimal role of PMX-HP in modern sepsis management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop