Search Results (240)

This study critically engages the ongoing national conversation and policy discourse on land expropriation without compensation in South Africa, offering both analytical insight and a principled position. It presents a qualitative, normative-analytical inquiry grounded primarily in critical documentary analysis of legislation, jurisprudence, and land reform scholarship. The study situates the contemporary debate within South Africa’s broader historical and structural context, where patterns of land dispossession continue to shape persistent spatial inequality and exclusion. The analysis proceeds from the premise that meaningful urban spatial transformation cannot be realised without addressing the structural constraints embedded within existing land governance and spatial planning systems. In this regard, debates around land expropriation are not simply questions of property law or economic policy but are fundamentally connected to broader concerns of spatial justice, economic inclusion, and social equity. These concerns are particularly salient when considering emerging imaginaries of African urban futures, including the notion of the Pan-African City—an urban formation envisioned as spatially integrated, socially inclusive, and reflective of shared continental aspirations for equitable development. The central argument advanced in this study is that unless South Africa gives serious and programmatic attention to land expropriation—moving beyond token or partial policy measures—the structural conditions necessary for such inclusive urban futures will remain unattainable. In this sense, any vision of a Pan-African City within South Africa’s borders risks remaining short-lived, if not altogether specious. To fully engage this debate, the paper unpacks and interrelates the concepts of land expropriation, compensation, expropriation without compensation, economic inclusivity, social equity, spatial justice, and the Pan-African City. These concepts cannot be adequately understood independent of the distinctly South African context—a context shaped by a history of racialised dispossession, deeply entrenched spatial inequalities, and the limitations of both first-generation (restitution, redistribution, tenure reform) and second-generation (e.g., the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act) land reform initiatives. The point advanced is unequivocal: without resolving the land question, sustainable housing and human settlement solutions in South Africa will not materialise. Anything less risks entrenching a democratic façade atop an unresolved colonial, segregationist, and apartheid foundation. Full article

Conservation easements (CEs) represent a complex policy instrument designed to mediate the feedback loops within coupled human and natural systems in protected areas. However, their efficacy is often constrained by a lack of systemic understanding of the localized drivers of community support. Building upon the successful implementation of Forest Land Easements (FLEs) within China’s Qianjiangyuan National Park Pilot, this study investigates the potential to expand this policy model to other land types. This study investigates the multilevel factors influencing residents’ willingness to adopt three types of CEs, including forest land (FLE), agricultural land (ALE) and homestead land (HLE) easements in China’s Qianjiangyuan National Park Pilot, the country’s primary CE reform site. We conceptualize a hierarchical support model wherein community participation (CP) and human well-being (HW) interact with support for park management (SM), forming a subsystem that drives decisions within the broader land-use. Utilizing structural equation modelling (SEM) and stepwise regression analysis on survey data from 336 households, we tested this model. The results reveal that SM acts as a critical direct mediator and positive driver of CE acceptance, while CP and HW exert significant indirect effects through SM, demonstrating a key feedback pathway. Regression analyses further elucidate that support for different CE types is driven by distinct configurations of factors, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of subsystems. Notably, livelihood benefits and prior participation experiences emerged as consistent, cross-cutting systemic leverages. It demonstrates that leveraging the implementation experience and community support gained from existing forest land easements is crucial. This study concludes that effective CE design must move beyond one-size-fits-all approaches. It necessitates differentiated, adaptive policies that are coherently aligned with local livelihood subsystems and strategically strengthen participatory feedback mechanisms initiated by successful FLEs. Our findings provide an evidence-based framework for designing resilient, socially sustainable conservation policies in complex protected area systems, grounded in proven practice. Full article

Against the macro-background of balancing development and food security strategies, China has implemented a land-use regulation system centered on farmland protection. However, the economic impacts of such regulation lack sufficient quantitative evaluation. Using farmland retention targets at the county-level in the administrative region and combining them with relevant data, this study employs an Intensity Difference-in-Differences (Intensity DID) approach to examine how land-use regulation affects county-level economic growth and convergence. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship between land-use regulation and county-level economic growth, suggesting that, at the current stage, the intensity of land-use regulation generally promotes economic growth. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that county economies in major grain production areas (MGPAs) and main grain-producing counties (MGPCs) experience stronger negative constraints related to the policy, while MGPCs in non-major grain production areas (non-MGPAs) are most sensitive to land-use regulation. China’s county economies exhibit convergence; however, land-use regulation may reduce the growth rate of counties that were underdeveloped in the base period, thereby widening inter-county development disparities. This divergence is manifested in the lack of convergence between the clubs of MGPCs and non-MGPCs. Mechanism analysis suggests that differences in industrial structure, capital investment, and fiscal expenditure constitute the key focal points for addressing the issue. Policy implications indicate that China should strengthen land-use regulation on the premise of rationally determining the functions and scale of various land types, continue to advance market-oriented reforms of land factors, improve the vertical and horizontal interest compensation mechanism for MGPAs, and stimulate the endogenous development momentum of these regions. Full article

China’s agricultural modernization hinges on integrating smallholder farmers into modern production systems, yet incomplete rural factor markets and endowment constraints hinder this transition. This study examines how capital, labor, and land constraints limit smallholders’ adoption of modern agricultural production (MAP) and whether technological progress biases exacerbate these barriers. Using panel data from Shandong and Henan (2012–2022), we find that endowment constraints reduce MAP adoption by 0.028% per 1% increase in constraints, with capital constraints being the most binding. These findings remain robust after endogeneity concerns and robustness checks. Regarding the mechanism, capital-based technological progress bias mitigates the negative impact, whereas labor-based technological progress bias exacerbates it. Smallholder farmers are generally biased towards increased use of labor-based technologies and reduced use of capital-based technologies, but the trend is gradually reversing. Policy priorities include targeted subsidies to alleviate capital constraints, land tenure reforms to facilitate scale operations, and technology extension programs tailored to smallholders’ resource endowments. These findings offer a roadmap for China’s rural revitalization strategy and broader agricultural modernization efforts in developing economies. Full article

This study aims to evaluate the impact of agricultural land property rights system reform on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity (AGTFP) and to uncover its underlying mechanisms. Treating the nationwide rollout of the Three Rights Separation Reform (TRSR) as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ provincial panel data from 2011 to 2023. The Super-SBM model is applied to measure AGTFP, followed by a multi-period Difference-in-Differences framework to identify the causal effects. The results indicate that the TRSR significantly enhances AGTFP, yielding an average improvement of 0.112 units. Mechanism analyses reveal that this gain is achieved through three distinct channels: promoting labor-saving technological progress, optimizing factor allocation efficiency, and facilitating agricultural green transformation. Heterogeneity analyses further demonstrate that the positive effects are more pronounced in plains regions, areas with lower rural per capita income, and jurisdictions with higher agricultural fiscal expenditure. These findings remain robust after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. This study provides novel institutional evidence on the drivers of AGTFP and offers policy-relevant insights for advancing sustainable agricultural transformation in developing economies. Full article

The Jordanian portion of the Jordan Valley serves as a critical geostrategic and agricultural corridor, yet it faces an existential threat from absolute water scarcity, climate change, and regional demographic pressures. This study provides an exhaustive qualitative analysis of water governance in the valley, drawing on national strategies, institutional archives, and longitudinal data from 2000 to 2025. The research evaluates the transition of the Jordan Valley Authority (JVA) from a centralized development agency toward a mature, tri-tier decentralization framework involving Water User Associations (WUAs). Despite these reforms, systemic challenges such as elite capture, non-revenue water (NRW) losses in the King Abdullah Canal (KAC), and the subsidies continue to hinder efficiency. The study applies the Water–Energy–Food–Ecosystem (WEFE) nexus framework to examine the interdependencies between energy-intensive pumping, the reuse of Treated Wastewater (TWW) for 98% in certain sectors, and the preservation of the Dead Sea ecosystem. Findings indicate that while land-use policies have preserved 371,000 dunums of agricultural land, approximately 71,000 dunums remain uncultivated due to water shortages. The manuscript identifies the Amman-Aqaba Water Conveyance Project (AAWA) and the 2030 Digital IT Roadmap as essential catalysts for long-term resilience. The paper concludes with adaptive governance recommendations aimed at reconciling national strategic priorities with localized operational efficiency. Full article

For a long time, low efficiency in the transfer of rural collective land use rights and the ambiguous attribution of collective land property rights have not only restricted the mobility of rural labor factors but have also hindered the release of vitality in the rural collective economy. This has resulted in lagging growth in the income that rural residents obtain from collective economic factors, contributing to the persistent widening of the urban/rural income gap. As an important institutional innovation to address these issues, the effects of the reform of the rural collective property rights system urgently need to be clarified. The reform of the rural collective property rights system constitutes a major initiative in the transformation of the rural land system. Centered on asset verification and valuation, as well as the demarcation of membership rights and the restructuring towards a shareholding cooperative system, it aims to establish a collective property rights regime characterized by clearly defined ownership and fully functional entitlements. This study takes the national pilot reform of rural collective property rights launched in 2016 as a quasi-natural policy experiment, systematically examining the impact of this pilot policy on the internal income gap within households and its spillover effects on the urban–rural income gap. Based on microdata from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) and the China Longitudinal Night Light Data Set (PANDA-China), this study constructs a five-period balanced panel dataset covering 2304 rural households across 25 provinces. A relative exploitation index based on the Kawani index is constructed, and empirical analysis is conducted using a combination of multi-period difference-in-differences (Multi-period DID), discrete binary models, and propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) models. The results show that: First, the pilot reform significantly reduced the level of income inequality within rural areas in the pilot regions, and its policy benefits further generated positive spillovers via market-driven factor allocation mechanisms, effectively bridging the urban–rural income gap. Second, institutional reforms activated the potential of rural non-agricultural economic factors, establishing new channels for a two-way flow of urban and rural factors, becoming an important path to achieve the goal of common prosperity. Third, the policy effects exhibited significant heterogeneity, specifically manifested in the attributes of major grain-producing regions, initial household income levels, and the human capital characteristics of household heads having significant moderating effects on reform outcomes. This study not only provides theoretical support and empirical evidence for deepening rural property rights reforms under the new rural revitalization strategy, but it also reveals the driving role of institutional innovation in factor mobility, thereby influencing the transmission mechanism of income distribution patterns. This finding offers a China-based solution for developing countries to address the imbalance in urban–rural development and the widening income gap. Full article

District heating systems are central to Europe’s decarbonisation strategy and its 2050 climate-neutrality objective. However, district heating is deeply embedded in the socio-economic system and the built environment. This makes compliance with policy targets at the local level particularly challenging. The issues are attributable to two factors. Firstly, the process is characterised by a high degree of complexity and multidimensionality. Secondly, there is a scarcity of local resources (e.g., land, surface waters, waste heat, etc.). In Bucharest, Romania, the largest district heating system in the European Union, the process of decarbonisation represents a particularly complex challenge. The system is characterised by large physical dimensions, high technical wear, heavy dependence on natural gas, significant heat losses and complex governance structures. This paper presents a strategic planning exercise for aligning the Bucharest system with the Energy Efficiency Directive 2023/1791. Drawing on system data, investment modelling, and local resource mapping from the LIFE22-CET-SET_HEAT project, the study evaluates scenarios for 2028 and 2035 that shift heat generation from natural gas to renewable, waste heat, and high-efficiency sources. The central objective is the identification of opportunities and issues. Options include large-scale heat pumps, waste-to-energy, geothermal and solar heat. Heat demand profiles and electricity price dynamics are used to evaluate economic feasibility and operational flexibility. The findings show that the decarbonisation heat supply in Bucharest is technically possible, but financial viability hinges on phased investments, interinstitutional coordination, regulatory reforms and access to EU funding. The study concludes with recommendations for staged implementation, coordinated governance and socio-economic measures to safeguard heat affordability and system reliability. Full article

Drawing on evidence from China’s land market, this study systematically investigates the impact of land misallocation on economic resilience and reveals the underlying mechanism that operates by suppressing technological advancement. A theoretical model of economic resilience is developed, incorporating technology and factor allocation. Empirical analysis is conducted using a panel dataset of 95 Chinese cities (2012–2024) through spatial econometric and mediation models. The findings indicate that land misallocation significantly reduces local economic resilience and exhibits negative spatial spillover effects. The core mechanism is identified as follows: subsidies via low-priced industrial land delay the market exit of low-efficiency firms, hindering the reallocation of production factors to more productive sectors. This suppression of technological progress ultimately weakens a region’s capacity to withstand external shocks. Based on the findings, policy implications include optimizing land supply structure, accelerating fiscal system reform, and strengthening policy coordination. Full article

This study analyzes the establishment of Local Agri-Food Systems (LAFSs) in the triple-border region between the states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo, by identifying and mapping potential areas of primary peasant agri-food production. An integrated analysis of data sources was treated, processed, and integrated into a common spatial support. Land use and land cover data were used from demographic and agricultural censuses, from the Rural Environmental Registry, agrarian reform settlement projects and conservation units. Our study revealed that 23.73% of the regional area has potential for peasant production, identifying four regions that stand out in terms of this potential. The area presented livestock and animal husbandry as the main agri-food chain, with potential for processing within the territory itself, in addition to extractive activities in the Atlantic Forest biome. The results indicate that there are possibilities for the establishment of LAFSs as a local development strategy associated with social inclusion and environmental responsibility, although there is a need to expand and strengthen the transportation and marketing channels for products from these short chains. The cartographies produced aim to contribute as auxiliary instruments to land use planning and management, seeking to strengthen LAFSs at different scales of governance. Full article

The transfer price of land management rights, as a key component of deepening rural reform at the 20th National Congress, profoundly influences the direction of agricultural production. Analyzing the land transfer management rights price differences can provide a deep understanding of regional transfer patterns and promote efficient land transfer. This study employs the SES framework to investigate factors of land transfer price differences by integrating correlation regression with the Boosted Regression Tree model. The results showed that (1) resource units determine land transfer management rights prices, with agricultural output value and net arable land income serving as core determinants. (2) City W is in the nascent land market, where the resource systems (RS) exert stronger influence. Key drivers include the transportation accessibility index and the proportion of flexible land. Compared to County K, where the land market exhibits full competition, the primary drivers of price shift from the resource systems to the governance systems and actors. Land transfer participants and the number of rural economic organizations become the main factors. Within the same Eastern black soil region, the transfer price differed by several thousand yuan per hectare. This disparity stems from differences in the two driving structures, necessitating the precise implementation of land transfer policies. Full article

To contribute to the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this study focuses on improving two specific goals—SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production)—by examining how off-farm employment affects agricultural green total factor productivity (GTFP) in China, a key link between rural socio-economic transformation and agricultural sustainability. The results show that: First, the part-time operation of farmers significantly reduces the green total factor productivity, and the negative impact is more pronounced for off-farm employment households with higher non-agricultural income shares. It mainly stems from the redundant input of land and machinery elements. Second, the effect showed obvious heterogeneous effects at different stages of family development and land management scale. In addition, the scale effect of continuous agricultural production services and the technological synergy effect driven by the deepening of agricultural division of labor are the key to improving green total factor productivity and alleviating the negative effects of part-time operations. In summary, promoting sustainable agricultural practices requires the government to further deepen the reform of the land property rights system and optimize the agricultural socialization service system to ensure both food security and environmental sustainability. Full article

The dual Hukou system, originating in China’s planned economy period, structured Chinese society into separate urban and rural segments, thereby generating distinct sets of rights and benefits for agricultural and non-agricultural residents regarding land, social security, education, and healthcare. Urban home purchase is a pivotal indicator of social integration for rural–urban migrants in destination cities. While the literature has extensively examined migrants’ residential conditions in China, the institutional impact of the agricultural hukou system—a core constraint—on their urban homeownership, along with its underlying mechanisms and heterogeneity, remains underexplored. To address this gap, this study adopts a twofold approach: theoretically, it employs the separating equilibrium model in housing markets with incomplete information to verify that agricultural hukou acts as an institutional barrier to migrants’ local home purchases; empirically, it uses data from the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) and applies the Fairlie decomposition method to quantify the constraint effect. The empirical results suggest that agricultural hukou exerts a 29.72% suppressive effect on migrants’ urban home purchase behavior. This effect operates indirectly by weakening migrants’ long-term settlement intention, which serves as a mediating variable. Moreover, the hindrance of agricultural hukou varies heterogeneously across groups, differing in education level, generational cohort, and regional distribution. To advance the fair and sustainable development of the real estate market, we advocate accelerating hukou reform by decoupling public services from residence status, fostering inclusive urbanization, and ensuring equitable development of housing markets. Full article

Agroecology offers a transformative pathway toward sustainable food systems by integrating ecological, economic, and social dimensions of farming. While its conceptual and policy foundations are increasingly recognized in European Union (EU) strategies, the practical adoption of agroecological principles at the farm level remains uneven, particularly in socio-economically peripheral Member States. This article investigates the enabling and constraining factors of agroecological uptake in three EU countries—Czech Republic, Hungary, and Portugal, using a mixed qualitative approach that combined literature review, policy mapping, and 42 in-depth farmer interviews conducted in 2020–2021. Data were analyzed through a shared coding framework, iterative team discussions, and a standardized comparative matrix to ensure cross-country validity. The results reveal shared barriers, including limited institutional coordination, subsidy dependency, and structural land inequalities, alongside country-specific dynamics such as farmer-to-farmer learning in Portugal, family-farm identity in Czechia, and trust-based advisory relations in Hungary. The findings underscore that systemic constraints, rather than conceptual gaps, impede agroecological transitions, and highlight the need for context-sensitive policy instruments, advisory reforms, and training programs aligned with agroecological principles. The paper contributes to the literature by providing empirical insight into farmer attitudes and practices in Central and Southern Europe and by offering actionable recommendations for designing policies and training. Full article

At the European level, potato cultivation is highly polarized. In Western Europe (Germany, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark), yields are high, agricultural technology is advanced, and production systems ensure stability and competitiveness. In contrast, in Eastern and Southern Europe (including Romania, Poland, Italy, and Spain), yields are considerably lower due to the use of outdated agricultural practices, a low degree of mechanization, and increased exposure to adverse climatic factors. In Romania, potato cultivation is marked by significant territorial disparities and structural imbalances, influenced by land fragmentation, agro-pedoclimatic variability, and the lack of capital necessary for investments in modern technologies and irrigation systems. This study analyzes these regional disparities in relation to the country’s real agricultural potential and quantifies the economic impact of its failure to realize it. The methodology applied is based on descriptive statistical analysis of data at the county and regional level for the period 2003–2024, including minimum, maximum, average, and standard deviations of yields. These were integrated into a production function that correlates cultivated areas with average prices, highlighting major intra-regional differences and significant economic consequences at the national level. The results indicate a double crisis: a drastic reduction in the areas cultivated with potatoes (from 196,000 ha in 2017 to 76,000 ha in 2024) and consistently low yields (12,000–18,000 kg/ha), which led to the collapse of total production (from 3.1 million tons in 2017 to under 1 million tons in 2024). As a result, Romania registers a productivity three to four times lower than the reference Western European countries. Moreover, Romania has moved from being a net exporter to a net importer of potatoes, with the food self-sufficiency indicator decreasing from 100.3% in 2017 to 48.1% in 2023. Although domestic production could theoretically cover consumption needs, structural problems regarding yields, the sharp reduction in cultivated areas, and distribution deficiencies have seriously affected the balance of the domestic market. While per capita consumption has remained relatively constant, the decline in production has led, after 2021, to an increasing dependence on imports. These trends highlight the need for urgent structural reforms, technological modernization, and targeted agricultural policies to increase productivity and restore food security in the Romanian potato crop system. Full article