Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = latest fault displacement

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 19607 KB  
Article
Identifying the Latest Displacement and Long-Term Strong Earthquake Activity of the Haiyuan Fault Using High-Precision UAV Data, NE Tibetan Plateau
by Xin Sun, Wenjun Zheng, Dongli Zhang, Haoyu Zhou, Haiyun Bi, Zijian Feng and Bingxu Liu
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(11), 1895; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17111895 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 702
Abstract
Strong earthquake activity along fault zones can lead to the displacement of geomorphic units such as gullies and terraces while preserving earthquake event data through changes in sedimentary records near faults. The quantitative analysis of these characteristics facilitates the reconstruction of significant earthquake [...] Read more.
Strong earthquake activity along fault zones can lead to the displacement of geomorphic units such as gullies and terraces while preserving earthquake event data through changes in sedimentary records near faults. The quantitative analysis of these characteristics facilitates the reconstruction of significant earthquake activity history along the fault zone. Recent advancements in acquisition technology for high-precision and high-resolution topographic data have enabled more precise identification of displacements caused by fault activity, allowing for a quantitative assessment of the characteristics of strong earthquakes on faults. The 1920 Haiyuan earthquake, which occurred on the Haiyuan fault in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, resulted in a surface rupture zone extending nearly 240 km. Although clear traces of surface rupture have been well preserved along the fault, debate regarding the maximum displacement is ongoing. In this study, we focused on two typical offset geomorphic sites along the middle segment of the Haiyuan fault that were previously identified as having experienced the maximum displacement during the Haiyuan earthquake. High-precision geomorphologic images of the two sites were obtained through unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys, which were combined with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data along the fault zone. Our findings revealed that the maximum horizontal displacement of the Haiyuan earthquake at the Shikaguan site was approximately 5 m, whereas, at the Tangjiapo site, it was approximately 6 m. A cumulative offset probability distribution (COPD) analysis of high-density fault displacement measurements along the ruptures indicated that the smallest offset clusters on either side of the Ganyanchi Basin were 4.5 and 5.1 m long. This analysis further indicated that the average horizontal displacements of the Haiyuan earthquake were approximately 4–6 m. Further examination of multiple gullies and geomorphic unit displacements at the Shikatougou site, along with a detailed COPD analysis of dense displacement measurements within a specified range on both sides, demonstrated that the cumulative displacement within 30 m of this section of the Haiyuan fault exhibited at least five distinct displacement clusters. These dates may represent the results of five strong earthquake events in this fault segment over the past 10,000–13,000 years. The estimated magnitude, derived from the relationship between displacement and magnitude, ranged from Mw 7.4 to 7.6, with an uneven recurrence interval of approximately 2500–3200 years. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 17489 KB  
Article
Ground Displacements Estimation through GNSS and Geometric Leveling: A Geological Interpretation of the 2016–2017 Seismic Sequence in Central Italy
by Riccardo Salvini, Claudio Vanneschi, Chiara Lanciano and Renzo Maseroli
Geosciences 2022, 12(4), 167; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12040167 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3100 | Correction
Abstract
Between August 2016 and January 2017, a very energetic seismic sequence induced substantial horizontal and vertical ground displacements in the Central Italian Apennines. After this event, the Italian Military Geographical Institute (IGM), owner and manager of the Italian geodetic networks, executed several topographic [...] Read more.
Between August 2016 and January 2017, a very energetic seismic sequence induced substantial horizontal and vertical ground displacements in the Central Italian Apennines. After this event, the Italian Military Geographical Institute (IGM), owner and manager of the Italian geodetic networks, executed several topographic surveys in the earthquake area in order to update the coordinates of vertices belonging to the IGM95 geodetic network. The measurements began in the areas where the most significant deformation occurred: the localities of Amatrice and Accumoli, in the Rieti Province, and the area covering Norcia and Castelluccio, in the Province of Perugia, all the way to Visso (Province of Macerata). The activities described in this paper focused on the updated measurement of the IGM95 network points through GNSS and the restatement of extensive parts of the high precision geometric lines that were levelled until reaching stable zones. This unprecedented amount of data was used for a new geological interpretation of the seismic sequence, which confirms some of the previous hypotheses of the scientific community. In the analyzed territory, the latest estimate of the geodetic position points has allowed for an accurate determination of the east and the north and of the altitude components of the displacement induced by the earthquake through a comparison with the previous coordinates. The results confirm that the seismicity was induced by normal faults system activity. Still, they also indicate the possible influence of a significant regional thrust that conditioned the propagation of the seismicity in the area. The obtained maps of the displacement are coherent with other geodetic works and with a rupture propagation driven by the documented geotectonic structure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop