Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (109)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lyssavirus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 773 KB  
Communication
Bat Species Identification and Alphacoronavirus, Beta- and Gammaherpesvirus Findings in Bat Colonies in Tuscany and Latium Regions During Lyssavirus Surveillance
by Silvia Tofani, Ida Ricci, Cersini Antonella, Giuseppe Manna, Raffaella Conti, Andrea Lombardo, Davide La Rocca, Marco Scalisi, Roberta Giordani, Massimiliano Simula, Gabriele Pietrella, Roberto Nardini, Erica Tilesi and Maria Teresa Scicluna
Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16(8), 170; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16080170 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 351
Abstract
Chiroptera includes over 1400 bat species, with at least 35 of these present in Italy. Due to their role as Lyssavirus reservoirs, bats found dead, with and without signs suggestive of this infection, are routinely submitted to the laboratory network of the Istituti [...] Read more.
Chiroptera includes over 1400 bat species, with at least 35 of these present in Italy. Due to their role as Lyssavirus reservoirs, bats found dead, with and without signs suggestive of this infection, are routinely submitted to the laboratory network of the Istituti Zooprofilattici Sperimentali in the framework of the rabies national passive and active surveillance program. Carcasses and biological samples collected from January to December 2021 in Latium and Tuscany, regions of our jurisdiction, were further screened for the presence of Coronaviruses (CoVs) and Herpesviruses using pan-family virus PCR tests, and relative PCR products were Sanger sequenced. Genetic characterization through sequencing detected AlphaCoVs in Miniopterus schreibersii and Beta- and Gammaherpesviruses in Tadarida teniotis. Samples were also submitted to bat genetic species identification. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1391 KB  
Article
Lyssavirus Antibody Detection in Cave-Dwelling Bats on Cat Ba Island, Vietnam: Implications for Zoonotic Surveillance
by Heliana Dundarova, Tsenka Chassovnikarova, Nadezhda Todorova, Michaela Beltcheva, Iliana Aleksieva, Nguyen Thanh Luong and Vu Dinh Thong
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(7), 654; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12070654 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1791
Abstract
Southeast Asia is a biodiversity hotspot for bats that can carry lyssaviruses, causing zoonotic diseases. This study detects and quantifies IgG antibodies against Lyssavirus glycoproteins in cave-dwelling bat populations on Cat Ba Island, northern Vietnam, to determine their past exposure history and the [...] Read more.
Southeast Asia is a biodiversity hotspot for bats that can carry lyssaviruses, causing zoonotic diseases. This study detects and quantifies IgG antibodies against Lyssavirus glycoproteins in cave-dwelling bat populations on Cat Ba Island, northern Vietnam, to determine their past exposure history and the prevalence of immune responses. Samples were collected from five caves, encompassing three families and five key species (Hipposideros armiger, H. alongensis, H. poutensis, Taphozous melanopogon, and Myotis pilosus). Using ELISA with the Platelia™ Rabies II kit,(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) 29.0% (18/62) of the bats tested positive, indicating prior exposure. The detection rate was slightly higher in females (35.7%) than in males (30.4%). Lyssavirus-specific antibodies were detected in four species, with the highest levels found in M. pilosus, followed by H. alongensis, H. armiger, and H. poutensis; no positives were found in T. melanopogon samples. One bat exhibited high seroconversion value (>4 EU/mL). The findings provide serological evidence of widespread lyssaviruses exposure in asymptomatic bats on Cat Ba Island, confirming their role as reservoirs that elicit an immune response without exhibiting rabies symptoms. This highlights the role of caves in facilitating close contact among bats, which may increase viral transmission, highlighting the need for continued surveillance in these unique roosting environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Microbiology, Parasitology and Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1687 KB  
Article
Detection and Prevalence of Rabies in Bats from Oaxaca
by María Isabel Medina Matías, Margarita García-Luis, Oscar Ezequiel Blanco Esquivel, Israel Nicolás Reyes, Miguel Ángel Domínguez Martínez and Gisela Fuentes-Mascorro
Microorganisms 2025, 13(6), 1417; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061417 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1453
Abstract
The rabies virus (genus Lyssavirus), is a deadly zoonotic agent affecting humans and animals. Although Mexico has been declared free of canine rabies (V1), sylvatic rabies persists. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the virus in Desmodus rotundus and other non-hematophagous [...] Read more.
The rabies virus (genus Lyssavirus), is a deadly zoonotic agent affecting humans and animals. Although Mexico has been declared free of canine rabies (V1), sylvatic rabies persists. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the virus in Desmodus rotundus and other non-hematophagous bat species in Oaxaca. The methodology comprised four stages: a literature review, data requests to the Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA), fieldwork using mist nets across 15 municipalities in Oaxaca, and diagnosis via direct immunofluorescence at the Centro Nacional de Servicios de Diagnóstico en Salud Animal (CENASA). SENASICA reported 89 positive rabies cases (2014–2023) across six laboratories, with the majority (67.02%) attributed to the Oaxaca State Public Health Laboratory. Among the 194 bats analyzed (129 D. rotundus), only three tested positive for the virus, yielding a prevalence of 1.54%. Positive cases were exclusively identified in D. rotundus from San Lucas Ojitlán and The Heroic City of Tlaxiaco. This prevalence aligns with that of national studies, which ranges from 0.05% to 3%. These findings underscore the need to maintain epidemiological surveillance in wild and domestic fauna, alongside public awareness campaigns highlighting bats’ ecological importance for ecosystem conservation and the risks associated with their decline. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rabies Virus: Infections, Reservoirs and Vectors)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

60 pages, 6483 KB  
Review
The Challenge of Lyssavirus Infections in Domestic and Other Animals: A Mix of Virological Confusion, Consternation, Chagrin, and Curiosity
by Charles E. Rupprecht, Aniruddha V. Belsare, Florence Cliquet, Philip P. Mshelbwala, Janine F. R. Seetahal and Vaughn V. Wicker
Pathogens 2025, 14(6), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14060586 - 13 Jun 2025
Viewed by 3219
Abstract
Lyssaviruses are RNA viruses in the Family Rhabdoviridae, Genus Lyssavirus. They represent the causative agents of acute, progressive encephalitis, known historically as rabies. Regardless of specific etiology, their collective viral morphology, biochemistry, pathobiology, associated clinical signs, diagnosis, epizootiology, and management are essentially [...] Read more.
Lyssaviruses are RNA viruses in the Family Rhabdoviridae, Genus Lyssavirus. They represent the causative agents of acute, progressive encephalitis, known historically as rabies. Regardless of specific etiology, their collective viral morphology, biochemistry, pathobiology, associated clinical signs, diagnosis, epizootiology, and management are essentially the same. Despite centuries of clinical recognition, these quintessential neurotropic agents remain significant pathogens today, with substantive consequences to agriculture, public health, and conservation biology. Notably, the singular morbidity caused by lyssaviruses is incurable and constitutes the highest case fatality of any viral disease. All warm-blooded vertebrates are believed to be susceptible. The dog is the only domestic animal that serves as a reservoir, vector, and victim. In contrast, felids are effective vectors, but not reservoirs. All other rabid domestic species, such as livestock, constitute spillover infections, as a bellwether to local lyssavirus activity. Frequently, professional confusion abounds among the veterinary community, because although the viral species Lyssavirus rabies is inarguably the best-known representative in the Genus, at least 20 other recognized or putative members of this monophyletic group are known. Frequently, this is simply overlooked. Moreover, often the ‘taxonomic etiology’ (i.e., ‘Lyssavirus x’) is mistakenly referenced in a biopolitcal context, instead of the obvious clinical illness (i.e., ‘rabies’). Global consternation persists, if localities believe they are ‘disease-free’, when documented lyssaviruses circulate or laboratory-based surveillance is inadequate to support such claims. Understandably, professional chagrin develops when individuals mistake the epidemiological terminology of control, prevention, elimination, etc. Management is not simple, given that the only licensed veterinary and human vaccines are against rabies virus, sensu lato. There are no adequate antiviral drugs for any lyssaviruses or cross-reactive biologics developed against more distantly related viral members. While representative taxa among the mammalian Orders Chiroptera, Carnivora, and Primates exemplify the major global reservoirs, which mammalian species are responsible for the perpetuation of other lyssaviruses remains a seemingly academic curiosity. This zoonosis is neglected. Clearly, with such underlying characteristics as a fundamental ‘disease of nature’, rabies, unlike smallpox and rinderpest, is not a candidate for eradication. With the worldwide zeal to drive human fatalities from canine rabies viruses to zero by the rapidly approaching year 2030, enhanced surveillance and greater introspection of the poorly appreciated burden posed by rabies virus and diverse other lyssaviruses may manifest as an epidemiological luxury to the overall global program of the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Challenges in Veterinary Virology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2679 KB  
Article
Genomic and Clinical Analysis of a Fatal Human Lyssavirus irkut Case: Evidence for a Natural Focus in the Russian Far East
by Ekaterina Klyuchnikova, Anna Gladkikh, Olga Iunikhina, Valeriya Sbarzaglia, Elena Drobot, Margarita Popova, Irina Lyapun, Tatiana Arbuzova, Irina Galkina, Alena Sharova, Svetlana Abramova, Nadezhda Tsyganova, Eva Pugacheva, Edward Ramsay, Elena Poleshchuk, Larisa Somova, Daria Tagakova, Dmitry Pankratov, Gennady Sidorov, Nikolay Rudakov, Vladimir Dedkov and Mikhail Shchelkanovadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Viruses 2025, 17(6), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17060769 - 28 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 737
Abstract
In this report, we document and analyze a case in which the Irkut virus (IRKV) (Mononegavirales: Rhabdoviridae) caused a fatal human case following a bat bite in June 2021. Unfortunately, the available data did not permit a detailed taxonomic classification of the carrier [...] Read more.
In this report, we document and analyze a case in which the Irkut virus (IRKV) (Mononegavirales: Rhabdoviridae) caused a fatal human case following a bat bite in June 2021. Unfortunately, the available data did not permit a detailed taxonomic classification of the carrier bat (Chiroptera). The event occurred in the southwestern part of the Sikhote-Alin mountain region (Russian Far East) covered by the Ussuri taiga forest. The symptoms of the illness began with the following: fever; pronounced psychomotor and motor agitation; tremor of the lower jaw and tongue; aphasia; dyslexia; and dysphagia. These rapidly developed, leading to a severe and fatal encephalitis. The patient was not vaccinated for rabies and did not receive rabies immunoglobulin. Using brain sections prepared from the deceased, molecular diagnostics were performed: immunofluorescence (polyclonal anti-rabies immunoglobulin) indicating the presence of the lyssavirus antigen; and RT-PCR indicating traces of viral RNA. Sectional material (brain) was used for whole-genome sequencing, resulting in a near-complete sequence of the lyssavirus genome. The obtained genomic sequence was identified as the Irkut virus. A comparative analysis of the new sequence and other currently available IRKV sequences (NCBI) revealed differences. Specifically, amino acid differences between antigenic sites in the isolate and those of the rabies vaccine strain used regionally were noted. The patient history and subsequent analysis confirm human IRKV infection following bat contact. Like other fatal cases of IRKV infection described earlier, this case occurred in the southern part of the Russian Far East. Two have occurred in the southwestern part of the Sikhote-Alin mountain region. This indicates the possible existence of an active, natural viral focus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Virology and Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 5798 KB  
Article
Molecular Surveillance for Potential Zoonotic Pathogens in Troglophilus Bats: Detection and Molecular Characterization of Bat Coronaviruses in Southern Italy
by Francesco Mira, Francesca Gucciardi, Giorgia Schiró, Rosario Grasso, Maria Teresa Spena, Gábor Kemenesi, Claudia Vaiana, Davide Anzá, Laura Di Paola, Santina Di Bella, Annalisa Guercio and Giuseppa Purpari
Pathogens 2025, 14(5), 457; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14050457 - 7 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1198
Abstract
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has renewed interest in bats, as they are natural hosts for numerous viruses, some of which have crossed species boundaries. Despite continued efforts in the past, the ecology of bat-related viruses in a significant part of national territories, such [...] Read more.
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has renewed interest in bats, as they are natural hosts for numerous viruses, some of which have crossed species boundaries. Despite continued efforts in the past, the ecology of bat-related viruses in a significant part of national territories, such as Italy, remains largely unexplored. Herein, we describe the detection and molecular characterization of bat coronaviruses, identified during a viral survey on selected potential zoonotic pathogens (lyssavirus and coronaviruses) carried out in Sicily, southern Italy. A total number of 330 samples were collected from 149 bats in a period (November 2020–April 2023) overlapping the COVID-19 pandemic. All samples tested negative for lyssavirus and SARS-CoV-2, while 12 bats (8.05%) tested positive to a pan-coronavirus assay. Both alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses were identified in samples from three species (Miniopterus schreibersii, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, and Rhinolophus hipposideros). Strain sequences were related to coronaviruses detected in the last decade in northern Italy as well as in other countries bordering the Mediterranean basin, suggesting a widespread diffusion of these strains. This study supports the need for further monitoring efforts and early detection of circulating coronavirus genotypes, particularly for those which have been repeatedly emerging as zoonotic spillovers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Pathogens)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1328 KB  
Article
Identification and Characterization of Viral and Bacterial Pathogens in Free-Living Bats of Kopaonik National Park, Serbia
by Dejan Vidanović, Nikola Vasković, Marko Dmitrić, Bojana Tešović, Mihailo Debeljak, Milovan Stojanović and Ivana Budinski
Vet. Sci. 2025, 12(5), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12050401 - 24 Apr 2025
Viewed by 738
Abstract
This pilot study investigated the presence of potentially zoonotic microorganisms in bat species from Kopaonik National Park, Serbia. A total of 40 individuals from 12 bat species were sampled and screened using microbiological and molecular methods. Salmonella spp., Chlamydia spp., Coxiella burnetii, [...] Read more.
This pilot study investigated the presence of potentially zoonotic microorganisms in bat species from Kopaonik National Park, Serbia. A total of 40 individuals from 12 bat species were sampled and screened using microbiological and molecular methods. Salmonella spp., Chlamydia spp., Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, Leptospira spp., Lyssavirus, Filoviridae, henipaviruses, and SARS-CoV-2 were not detected in any bats. Coronavirus genomes were confirmed in four bats—one Myotis brandtii, two Myotis daubentonii, and one Myotis cf. mystacinus. Sequence analysis identified the presence of alphacoronavirus genomes with high similarity to strains previously found in Europe. Mycoplasma spp. genomes were found in 18 bats (45%), and Rickettsia spp. were detected in five bats (12.5%), although species-level identification was not possible. The findings highlight the presence of certain bacteria and viruses in bats that could have implications for public health, especially in areas with close human–wildlife interaction. Although no direct evidence of high-risk pathogens was found, the results support the importance of continued surveillance and ecological studies on bats, given their role as potential reservoirs. Monitoring bat-associated microorganisms is essential to better understand possible transmission routes and improve the prevention of emerging zoonotic diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2080 KB  
Article
One Health Lens on Rabies: Human–Bat Interactions and Genomic Insights of Rabies Virus in Rural Lilongwe, Malawi
by Nathan Singano, Henson Kainga, Elisha Chatanga, Joseph Nkhoma, Gilson Njunga, Julius Chulu, Rabecca Tembo, Hirofumi Sawa and Walter Muleya
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2025, 10(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10040095 - 4 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1625 | Correction
Abstract
Rabies, a fatal zoonotic disease, affects humans, domestic animals, and wildlife predominantly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. In Malawi, rabies virus (RABV) is primarily transmitted by infected dogs, impacting humans and cattle. Lyssavirus has also been documented in insectivorous bats. A community [...] Read more.
Rabies, a fatal zoonotic disease, affects humans, domestic animals, and wildlife predominantly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. In Malawi, rabies virus (RABV) is primarily transmitted by infected dogs, impacting humans and cattle. Lyssavirus has also been documented in insectivorous bats. A community survey near bat roosts assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding bat-borne zoonoses. Bat samples were tested for lyssavirus using RT-PCR, and RABV genomes from humans and domestic animals were sequenced and analysed phylogenetically. The survey revealed that 50% of participants consumed bat meat, and 47% reported bats entering their homes. Reduced bat presence indoors significantly lowered contact risk (aOR: 0.075, p = 0.021). All 23 bat samples tested negative for lyssavirus. Malawian RABV genomes, 11,801 nucleotides long, belonged to the Africa 1b lineage, showing >95% similarity with GenBank sequences. Phylogenetic analysis indicated close clustering with strains from Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and South Africa. Human and cattle strains shared 99% and 92% amino acid similarity with dog strains, respectively, with conserved critical sites and unique substitutions across all five RABV genes. Frequent human–bat interactions pose zoonotic risks. While no lyssavirus was detected in bats, ongoing surveillance is crucial. This first comprehensive genome analysis of Malawian RABVs highlights their regional transmission and signifies the need for regional collaboration in rabies control, community education, and further study of genetic adaptations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rabies Epidemiology, Control and Prevention Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 6454 KB  
Article
Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Rabies Virus Lineages in South Africa
by Natalie Viljoen, Claude Sabeta, Wanda Markotter and Jacqueline Weyer
Viruses 2025, 17(3), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17030340 - 28 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1382
Abstract
Rabies virus (RABV; species Lyssavirus rabies) causes rabies, a disease of the central nervous system that invariably results in the death of the host. In South Africa, studies have indicated that RABV is maintained by animal species that include four wildlife carnivore [...] Read more.
Rabies virus (RABV; species Lyssavirus rabies) causes rabies, a disease of the central nervous system that invariably results in the death of the host. In South Africa, studies have indicated that RABV is maintained by animal species that include four wildlife carnivore species—the black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas), bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), yellow mongoose (Cynictis penicillata), and aardwolf (Proteles cristatus)—and domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). The complex natural ecology holds significant implications for the control and elimination of rabies. In this study, confirmed animal rabies case data, including geospatial features, were analyzed for 12,879 laboratory-confirmed animal cases reported on a database managed by the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD). Sequence data generated from animal rabies cases in South Africa were also analyzed, which included 1374 cytoplasmic domain of the glycoprotein and the G-L intergenic sequences using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference. The analysis provides insights into the transmission dynamics involving several wildlife species and domestic dogs in South Africa. This information is crucial for the strategic planning for rabies control and elimination programs, and particularly in understanding the interlinked nature of some lineages and the importance of the cross-border spread of rabies. This analysis provided an improved understanding of the distribution of the RABV lineages in South Africa and identified areas that can be targeted for rabies control strategies to limit future spread of RABV, which is important due to the limited available resources that must be carefully managed to allow optimal control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zoonotic and Vector-Borne Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4371 KB  
Article
AMPK Activation Downregulates TXNIP, Rab5, and Rab7 Within Minutes, Thereby Inhibiting the Endocytosis-Mediated Entry of Human Pathogenic Viruses
by Viktoria Diesendorf, Veronica La Rocca, Michelle Teutsch, Haisam Alattar, Helena Obernolte, Kornelia Kenst, Jens Seibel, Philipp Wörsdörfer, Katherina Sewald, Maria Steinke, Sibylle Schneider-Schaulies, Manfred B. Lutz and Jochen Bodem
Cells 2025, 14(5), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14050334 - 24 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1611
Abstract
Cellular metabolism must adapt rapidly to environmental alterations and adjust nutrient uptake. Low glucose availability activates the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK) pathway. We demonstrate that activation of AMPK or the downstream Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase (ULK1) inhibits receptor-mediated endocytosis. Beyond limiting dextran uptake, this activation [...] Read more.
Cellular metabolism must adapt rapidly to environmental alterations and adjust nutrient uptake. Low glucose availability activates the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK) pathway. We demonstrate that activation of AMPK or the downstream Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase (ULK1) inhibits receptor-mediated endocytosis. Beyond limiting dextran uptake, this activation prevents endocytic uptake of human pathogenic enveloped and non-enveloped, positive- and negative-stranded RNA viruses, such as yellow fever, dengue, tick-borne encephalitis, chikungunya, polio, rubella, rabies lyssavirus, and SARS-CoV-2, not only in mammalian and insect cells but also in precision-cut lung slices and neuronal organoids. ULK1 activation inhibited enveloped viruses but not EV71. However, receptor presentation at the cytoplasmic membrane remained unaffected, indicating that receptor binding was unchanged, while later stages of endocytosis were targeted via two distinct pathways. Drug-induced activation of the AMPK pathway reduced early endocytic factor TXNIP by suppressing translation. In contrast, the amounts of Rab5 and the late endosomal marker Rab7 decreased due to translation inactivation and ULK1-dependent proteasome activation within minutes. Furthermore, activation of AMPK hindered the late replication steps of SARS-CoV-2 by reducing viral RNAs and proteins and the endo-lysosomal markers LAMP1 and GRP78, suggesting a reduction in early and late endosomes and lysosomes. Inhibition of the PI3K and mTORC2 pathways, which sense amino acid and growth factor availability, promotes AMPK activity and blocks viral entry. Our results indicate that AMPK and ULK1 emerge as restriction factors of cellular endocytosis, impeding the receptor-mediated endocytic entry of enveloped and non-enveloped RNA viruses. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 655 KB  
Article
Risk Factors for Human Contact with Bats in Northern Tanzania
by Emmanuel Kulwa Bunuma, Julius Keyyu, Joseph Maziku, Stella Bitanyi, Robert Fyumagwa, Katendi Changula, Benjamin Mubemba, Edgar Simulundu, Simbarashe Chitanga, Daniel L. Horton, Abel Bulamu Ekiri and Walter Muleya
Zoonotic Dis. 2024, 4(4), 293-309; https://doi.org/10.3390/zoonoticdis4040025 - 12 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2269
Abstract
Background: Environmental changes impact bat–human interactions, heightening concerns of pathogen spillover and highlighting the need to understand human–bat interactions in the context of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with human contact with bats in communities living near [...] Read more.
Background: Environmental changes impact bat–human interactions, heightening concerns of pathogen spillover and highlighting the need to understand human–bat interactions in the context of ecosystems. The objective of this study was to assess factors associated with human contact with bats in communities living near bat roosts in Northern Tanzania. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used to investigate the factors associated with human contact with bats. Utilizing a standardized questionnaire administered through face-to-face interviews, relevant data were collected from respondents living in or near regions characterized by high bat density. Descriptive analyses followed by bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association between the investigated factors and the outcome variable of interest, contact with bats. Results: Data were collected from 325 respondents. Of the respondents, 57.5% (187/325) reported bat contact, and only 4% believed bats can transmit rabies. The following factors were significantly associated with human–bat contact: being unaware that bats can transmit diseases like rabies (AOR = 8.63, CI = 1.04, 71.43, p = 0.045), feeling safe to handle bats with bare hands (AOR = 3.47, CI = 1.71, 7.05, p < 0.001), not washing hands thoroughly after bat bite or scratch (AOR = 2.43, CI = 1.29, 4.59, p = 0.006), using water from ponds, rivers or wells (AOR = 5.58, CI = 3.17, 9.79, p <0.001), age > 45 years (AOR = 1.77, CI = 1.0, 3.14, p = 0.047) and a low level of education (AOR = 5.86, CI = 2.97, 11.57, p <0.001). Conclusion: The study findings highlight the key factors to be targeted when developing strategies aimed at improving the community’s knowledge of the potential risks of zoonotic infectious diseases associated with bats and reducing the likelihood of human–bat contact and the related public health risks in communities living near bat roosting sites in Tanzania. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 870 KB  
Review
Rabies in Cats—An Emerging Public Health Issue
by Christine Fehlner-Gardiner, Gyanendra Gongal, Tenzin Tenzin, Claude Sabeta, Paola De Benedictis, Silene Manrique Rocha, Alexander Vargas, Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Luis Carlos Gomez, Joanne Maki and Charles E. Rupprecht
Viruses 2024, 16(10), 1635; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101635 - 19 Oct 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7042
Abstract
Human rabies cases today are predominantly associated with infection from rabid domestic dogs. Unlike dogs, a common global reservoir species that perpetuates rabies viruses (RABV) within their populations, domestic cats are much less frequently reported or vaccinated. Epidemiologically, cats are important vectors of [...] Read more.
Human rabies cases today are predominantly associated with infection from rabid domestic dogs. Unlike dogs, a common global reservoir species that perpetuates rabies viruses (RABV) within their populations, domestic cats are much less frequently reported or vaccinated. Epidemiologically, cats are important vectors of lyssaviruses but are not viral reservoirs. Typically, cats are incidental hosts only, infected with the predominant lyssavirus in their geographic locale. Human cases associated with rabid cats have occurred in Africa, Asia, Europe and throughout the Americas. As adept, solitary hunters, wild and domestic felids are at risk of lyssavirus infection based upon interactions with infected prey, such as bats, or from transmission by other mesocarnivores, such as rabid dogs, foxes, jackals, raccoons, and skunks. Current veterinary vaccines provide safe and effective immunity in cats against phylogroup I lyssaviruses, such as RABV, but not against divergent lyssaviruses in phylogroups II-IV. With the focus upon the global elimination of canine rabies, the emergence of rabies in cats represents a concerning trend. Clearly, education about the occurrence of rabies in cats needs to be improved, as well as the routine vaccination of cats to reduce the associated risks to public health, agriculture, and conservation biology from a One Health perspective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Rabies Research 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3096 KB  
Article
Bat Rabies in the Americas: Is Myotis the Main Ancestral Spreader?
by Diego A. Caraballo, María Lorena Vico, María Guadalupe Piccirilli, Stella Maris Hirmas Riade, Susana Russo, Gustavo Martínez, Fernando J. Beltrán and Daniel M. Cisterna
Viruses 2024, 16(8), 1302; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081302 - 16 Aug 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1706
Abstract
The rabies virus (RABV) is the exclusive lyssavirus affecting both wild and domestic mammalian hosts in the Americas, including humans. Additionally, the Americas stand out as the sole region where bat rabies occurs. While carnivore rabies is being increasingly managed across the region, [...] Read more.
The rabies virus (RABV) is the exclusive lyssavirus affecting both wild and domestic mammalian hosts in the Americas, including humans. Additionally, the Americas stand out as the sole region where bat rabies occurs. While carnivore rabies is being increasingly managed across the region, bats are emerging as significant reservoirs of RABV infection for humans and domestic animals. Knowledge of the bat species maintaining rabies and comprehending cross-species transmission (CST) and host shift processes are pivotal for directing surveillance as well as ecological research involving wildlife reservoir hosts. Prior research indicates that bat RABV CST is influenced by host genetic similarity and geographic overlap, reflecting host adaptation. In this study, we compiled and analyzed a comprehensive nucleoprotein gene dataset representing bat-borne RABV diversity in Argentina and the broader Americas using Bayesian phylogenetics. We examined the association between host genus and geography, finding both factors shaping the global phylogenetic structure. Utilizing a phylogeographic approach, we inferred CST and identified key bat hosts driving transmission. Consistent with CST determinants, we observed monophyletic/paraphyletic clustering of most bat genera in the RABV phylogeny, with stronger CST evidence between host genera of the same family. We further discuss Myotis as a potential ancestral spreader of much of RABV diversity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 6191 KB  
Article
Toward the Development of a Pan-Lyssavirus Vaccine
by Sabrine Ben Hamed, Jacob F. Myers, Anisha Chandwani, Christoph Wirblich, Drishya Kurup, Nir Paran and Matthias J. Schnell
Viruses 2024, 16(7), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071107 - 10 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2555
Abstract
In addition to the rabies virus (RABV), 16 more lyssavirus species have been identified worldwide, causing a disease similar to RABV. Non-rabies-related human deaths have been described, but the number of cases is unknown, and the potential of such lyssaviruses causing human disease [...] Read more.
In addition to the rabies virus (RABV), 16 more lyssavirus species have been identified worldwide, causing a disease similar to RABV. Non-rabies-related human deaths have been described, but the number of cases is unknown, and the potential of such lyssaviruses causing human disease is unpredictable. The current rabies vaccine does not protect against divergent lyssaviruses such as Mokola virus (MOKV) or Lagos bat virus (LBV). Thus, a more broad pan-lyssavirus vaccine is needed. Here, we evaluate a novel lyssavirus vaccine with an attenuated RABV vector harboring a chimeric RABV glycoprotein (G) in which the antigenic site I of MOKV replaces the authentic site of rabies virus (RABVG-cAS1). The recombinant vaccine was utilized to immunize mice and analyze the immune response compared to homologous vaccines. Our findings indicate that the vaccine RABVG-cAS1 was immunogenic and induced high antibody titers against both RABVG and MOKVG. Challenge studies with different lyssaviruses showed that replacing a single antigenic site of RABV G with the corresponding site of MOKV G provides a significant improvement over the homologous RABV vaccine and protects against RABV, Irkut virus (IRKV), and MOKV. This strategy of epitope chimerization paves the way towards a pan-lyssavirus vaccine to safely combat the diseases caused by these viruses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Rabies Research 2023)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1428 KB  
Article
Detection and Serological Evidence of European Bat Lyssavirus 1 in Belgian Bats between 2016 and 2018
by Inne Nauwelaers, Claudia Van den Eynde, Sanne Terryn, Bob Vandendriessche, Wout Willems, Daan Dekeukeleire and Steven Van Gucht
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2024, 9(7), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9070151 - 5 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1739
Abstract
Lyssaviruses are neurotropic viruses capable of inducing fatal encephalitis. While rabies virus has been successfully eradicated in Belgium, the prevalence of other lyssaviruses remains uncertain. In this study, we conducted a survey on live animals and passive surveillance to investigate the presence of [...] Read more.
Lyssaviruses are neurotropic viruses capable of inducing fatal encephalitis. While rabies virus has been successfully eradicated in Belgium, the prevalence of other lyssaviruses remains uncertain. In this study, we conducted a survey on live animals and passive surveillance to investigate the presence of lyssaviruses in Belgium. In 2018, a total of 113 saliva samples and 87 blood samples were collected from bats. Saliva was subjected to RT-qPCR to identify lyssavirus infections. Additionally, an adapted lyssavirus neutralisation assay was set up for the detection of antibodies neutralising EBLV-1 in blood samples. Furthermore, we examined 124 brain tissue samples obtained from deceased bats during passive surveillance between 2016 and 2018. All saliva samples tested negative for lyssaviruses. Analysis of the blood samples uncovered the presence of lyssavirus-neutralising antibodies in five bat species and 32% of samples with a wide range depending on bat species, suggesting past exposure to a lyssavirus. Notably, EBLV-1 was detected in brain tissue samples from two Eptesicus serotinus specimens collected in 2016 near Bertrix and 2017 near Étalle, confirming for the first time the presence of EBLV-1 in Belgium and raising awareness of the potential risks associated with this species of bats as reservoirs of the virus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Treatment and Risk Assessment of Rabies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop