Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = movelet

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 749 KB  
Article
Smartphone-Based Activity Recognition Using Multistream Movelets Combining Accelerometer and Gyroscope Data
by Emily J. Huang, Kebin Yan and Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Sensors 2022, 22(7), 2618; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072618 - 29 Mar 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4062
Abstract
Physical activity patterns can reveal information about one’s health status. Built-in sensors in a smartphone, in comparison to a patient’s self-report, can collect activity recognition data more objectively, unobtrusively, and continuously. A variety of data analysis approaches have been proposed in the literature. [...] Read more.
Physical activity patterns can reveal information about one’s health status. Built-in sensors in a smartphone, in comparison to a patient’s self-report, can collect activity recognition data more objectively, unobtrusively, and continuously. A variety of data analysis approaches have been proposed in the literature. In this study, we applied the movelet method to classify the activities performed using smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope data, which measure a phone’s acceleration and angular velocity, respectively. The movelet method constructs a personalized dictionary for each participant using training data and classifies activities in new data with the dictionary. Our results show that this method has the advantages of being interpretable and transparent. A unique aspect of our movelet application involves extracting unique information, optimally, from multiple sensors. In comparison to single-sensor applications, our approach jointly incorporates the accelerometer and gyroscope sensors with the movelet method. Our findings show that combining data from the two sensors can result in more accurate activity recognition than using each sensor alone. In particular, the joint-sensor method reduces errors of the gyroscope-only method in differentiating between standing and sitting. It also reduces errors in the accelerometer-only method when classifying vigorous activities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wearables)
Show Figures

Figure 1

1 pages, 153 KB  
Correction
Correction: Huang, E.J., and Onnela, J.P. Augmented Movelet Method for Activity Classification Using Smartphone Gyroscope and Accelerometer Data. Sensors 2020, 20(13), 3706
by Emily J. Huang and Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Sensors 2020, 20(21), 6091; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216091 - 27 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1728
Abstract
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wearables)
18 pages, 438 KB  
Article
Augmented Movelet Method for Activity Classification Using Smartphone Gyroscope and Accelerometer Data
by Emily J. Huang and Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Sensors 2020, 20(13), 3706; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133706 - 2 Jul 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4726 | Correction
Abstract
Physical activity, such as walking and ascending stairs, is commonly used in biomedical settings as an outcome or covariate. Researchers have traditionally relied on surveys to quantify activity levels of subjects in both research and clinical settings, but surveys are subjective in nature [...] Read more.
Physical activity, such as walking and ascending stairs, is commonly used in biomedical settings as an outcome or covariate. Researchers have traditionally relied on surveys to quantify activity levels of subjects in both research and clinical settings, but surveys are subjective in nature and have known limitations, such as recall bias. Smartphones provide an opportunity for unobtrusive objective measurement of physical activity in naturalistic settings, but their data tends to be noisy and needs to be analyzed with care. We explored the potential of smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope data to distinguish between walking, sitting, standing, ascending stairs, and descending stairs. We conducted a study in which four participants followed a study protocol and performed a sequence of activities with one phone in their front pocket and another phone in their back pocket. The subjects were filmed throughout, and the obtained footage was annotated to establish moment-by-moment ground truth activity. We introduce a modified version of the so-called movelet method to classify activity type and to quantify the uncertainty present in that classification. Our results demonstrate the promise of smartphones for activity recognition in naturalistic settings, but they also highlight challenges in this field of research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Wearables)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 508 KB  
Article
Methods for Real-Time Prediction of the Mode of Travel Using Smartphone-Based GPS and Accelerometer Data
by Bryan D. Martin, Vittorio Addona, Julian Wolfson, Gediminas Adomavicius and Yingling Fan
Sensors 2017, 17(9), 2058; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092058 - 8 Sep 2017
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 5679
Abstract
We propose and compare combinations of several methods for classifying transportation activity data from smartphone GPS and accelerometer sensors. We have two main objectives. First, we aim to classify our data as accurately as possible. Second, we aim to reduce the dimensionality of [...] Read more.
We propose and compare combinations of several methods for classifying transportation activity data from smartphone GPS and accelerometer sensors. We have two main objectives. First, we aim to classify our data as accurately as possible. Second, we aim to reduce the dimensionality of the data as much as possible in order to reduce the computational burden of the classification. We combine dimension reduction and classification algorithms and compare them with a metric that balances accuracy and dimensionality. In doing so, we develop a classification algorithm that accurately classifies five different modes of transportation (i.e., walking, biking, car, bus and rail) while being computationally simple enough to run on a typical smartphone. Further, we use data that required no behavioral changes from the smartphone users to collect. Our best classification model uses the random forest algorithm to achieve 96.8% accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop