Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = multileaf collimator (MLC) width

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 1726 KB  
Article
Impact of Multileaf Collimator Width and Normal Tissue Objective on Radiation Dose Distribution in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using HyperArc for Single Brain Lesions
by Se An Oh, Jae Won Park, Ji Woon Yea, Jaehyeon Park and Yoon Young Jo
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050272 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 730
Abstract
This study retrospectively investigated the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) normal tissue objective (NTO) and multileaf collimator (MLC) width on radiation dose distribution in patients with brain metastasis treated using HyperArc. In total, 21 patients who underwent SRS using the HyperArc of the [...] Read more.
This study retrospectively investigated the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) normal tissue objective (NTO) and multileaf collimator (MLC) width on radiation dose distribution in patients with brain metastasis treated using HyperArc. In total, 21 patients who underwent SRS using the HyperArc of the TrueBeam linear accelerator from November 2022 to June 2024 were included. All patients received radiotherapy with HASH planned with SRS NTO and HD MLC. HyperArc(HAAH) combined with the auto NTO and HD MLC and HyperArc(HAAM) with auto NTO and millennium MLC were generated and compared. Monitor units (MU), conformity index (CI), radical dose homogeneity index (rDHI), moderate DHI (mDHI), and gradient index (GI) were evaluated as target factors, and V2(Gy), V10(Gy), V12(Gy), V18(Gy), V10(cc), and V12(cc) were evaluated as normal brain factors. Dosimetric comparisons were performed between HASH, HAAH, and HAAM and between target and normal brain tissues. Between HASH and HAAH, average MU was 7206 and 5798, respectively; the difference was significant (p < 0.001). The MU of HAAM was 5835. Among HASH, HAAH, and HAAM, CI and mDHI were not significantly different, but there were significant differences in rDHI, GI, and normal brain tissues. When treating a single lesion using HyperArc, SRS NTO influences MU and GI, and the MLC width influences rDHI and GI. In HyperArc for single metastatic brain lesions, SRS NTO and MLC width have a significant effect on the radiation dose delivered to the target and normal brain tissues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop