Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non-union rib fracture

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 678 KB  
Article
Rib Healing and Heterotopic Ossification After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures
by Alexander Hoey, Daniel Akyeampong, Arjun Patel, Ronald Gross and Evert A. Eriksson
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5581; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155581 - 7 Aug 2025
Viewed by 331
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the rate of rib fracture healing after Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSRFs). We sought to evaluate the radiographic evidence of rib healing and hypertrophic ossification (HO) in patients after SSRFs. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study [...] Read more.
Background: Little is known about the rate of rib fracture healing after Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSRFs). We sought to evaluate the radiographic evidence of rib healing and hypertrophic ossification (HO) in patients after SSRFs. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients who had undergone SSRFs from 1 January 2010 to 31 March 2023 and had a computed tomography (CT) of the chest performed greater than 6 months after SSRFs. The rib fracture locations were mapped on the initial trauma CT scan and evaluated on the follow-up CT scan for healing and HO formation. Results: A total of 254 SSRF cases were evaluated, 21 patients met the inclusion criteria; out of 208 fractures, 109 underwent SSRFs. The median time to follow-up CT scan was 17(7–88) months. Overall, 95% of the fractures healed completely. Seventy percent of the non-union fractures were in posterior or paraspinal locations on ribs 8–10. HO was noted in nine patients and seen as early as 8 months post-operatively. A significant association was identified between the fixation method used to perform SSRFs (89% vs. 11%, p = 0.024) and operative day (6(0–9) vs. 2(2–5), p = 0.023). Conclusions: Non-union of rib fractures is uncommon after SSRFs. Many of these fractures involve the posterior or paraspinal lower rib cage. HO between fractures is common after SSRFs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 8252 KB  
Article
Epidemiology of Symptomatic Non-Union/Malunion Rib Fractures
by Daniel Akyeampong, Alexander Hoey, Ronald Gross and Evert A. Eriksson
Surgeries 2025, 6(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6020032 - 8 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1189
Abstract
Background: Some rib fractures do not heal appropriately and can cause significant pain and morbidity. Little is known about the locations likely to experience dysfunctional healing. We sought to determine the location of symptomatic non-union/malunion (NU/MU) rib fractures presenting to our Chest Wall [...] Read more.
Background: Some rib fractures do not heal appropriately and can cause significant pain and morbidity. Little is known about the locations likely to experience dysfunctional healing. We sought to determine the location of symptomatic non-union/malunion (NU/MU) rib fractures presenting to our Chest Wall Injury and Reconstruction Center. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients with NU/MU fractures presenting for evaluation at our CWIRC from 1 January 2019 to 30 July 2023. Their rib injury locations were mapped using computed tomography scans of the chest and a physical exam was used to characterize the location of their symptomatic NU/MU fractures. The location of the NU/MU injury was identified as either the anterior (A), anterior–lateral (AL), lateral (L), posterior–lateral (PL), or posterior (P) region of the chest wall. The results are presented as a mean +/− standard deviation for normally distributed data and median (minimum—maximum) for non-normally distributed data. Results: A total of 28 cases were evaluated. The average age at time of presentation was 48+/−14 years and 71% of patients were male. A total of 72 NU/MU fractures (median/pt 2(1–11)) were evaluated. Sixty-one percent of the injuries were on the right side. In most patients (25/28, 89%), the injuries were all in the same anatomic location in the rib cage. Three patients had NU/MU injuries in multiple anatomic locations. All multilevel injuries were sequential, without any normally healed ribs between NU/MU injuries. The most common locations were the L and PL regions (A–3, AL–8, L–19, PL–42, P–0). The most commonly symptomatic ribs were in ribs 6–10. Conclusions: Symptomatic NU/MU healing often occurs in the L and PL locations along the bony chest wall. Symptomatic NU/MU injuries also occur in the cartilaginous extensions of the bony ribs and along the costal margin. Symptomatic NU/MU healing is uncommon in the A and AL upper rib cage, as well as in P injuries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2542 KB  
Case Report
Mandibular Reconstruction with Lateral Tibial Bone Graft: An Excellent Option for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
by Ana Lucia Carpi Miceli, Livia Costa Pereira, Thiago da Silva Torres, Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia and Rafael Seabra Louro
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2017, 10(4), 292-298; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593475 - 1 Nov 2016
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 256
Abstract
Autogenous bone grafts are the gold standard for reconstruction of atrophic jaws, pseudoarthroses, alveolar clefts, orthognathic surgery, mandibular discontinuity, and augmentation of sinus maxillary. Bone graft can be harvested from iliac bone, calvarium, tibial bone, rib, and intraoral bone. Proximal tibia is a [...] Read more.
Autogenous bone grafts are the gold standard for reconstruction of atrophic jaws, pseudoarthroses, alveolar clefts, orthognathic surgery, mandibular discontinuity, and augmentation of sinus maxillary. Bone graft can be harvested from iliac bone, calvarium, tibial bone, rib, and intraoral bone. Proximal tibia is a common donor site with few reported problems compared with other sites. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of proximal tibia as a donor area for maxillofacial reconstructions, focusing on quantifying the volume of cancellous graft harvested by a lateral approach and to assess the complications of this technique. In a retrospective study, we collected data from 31 patients, 18 women and 13 men (mean age: 36 years, range: 19–64), who were referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Servidores do Estado Federal Hospital. Patients were treated for sequelae of orthognathic surgery, jaw fracture, nonunion, malunion, pathology, and augmentation of bone volume to oral implant. The technique of choice was lateral access of proximal tibia metaphysis for graft removal from Gerdy tubercle under general anesthesia. The mean volume of bone harvested was 13.0 ± 3.7 mL (ranged: 8–23 mL). Only five patients (16%) had minor complications, which included superficial infection, pain, suture dehiscence, and unwanted scar. However, none of these complications decreases the result and resolved completely. We conclude that proximal tibia metaphysis for harvesting cancellous bone graft provides sufficient volume for procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery with minimal postoperative morbidity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop