Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (155)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pancreatic fistula

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 797 KB  
Article
Perioperative Risk of Palliative Gastrectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Multicenter Analysis of Severe Complications and Mortality
by Sang-Ho Jeong, Miyeong Park, Kyung Won Seo, Inyoung Lee, Jeong Woo Kim, Jae-Seok Min, Sungsoo Park and Information Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
Cancers 2026, 18(11), 1753; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18111753 - 27 May 2026
Viewed by 80
Abstract
Background: Palliative surgery is often considered for advanced stages of gastric cancer to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; however, it is associated with considerable risks of postoperative complications and mortality. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in [...] Read more.
Background: Palliative surgery is often considered for advanced stages of gastric cancer to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; however, it is associated with considerable risks of postoperative complications and mortality. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in severe complication rates and mortality between palliative and curative gastric cancer surgeries using data from a nationwide survey conducted by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Materials and Methods: Data from 12,420 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery in 2019 were analyzed. Surgical procedures were categorized as total gastrectomies (TGs), distal gastrectomies (DGs), or bypass operations. Patients were divided into curative gastrectomy (CG, n = 12,114) and palliative surgery (PS, n = 306) groups. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien–Dindo (C-D) classification. Severe complications were defined as C-D grade IIIa or higher. Results: Compared with the CG group, the PS group had significantly higher rates of severe complications (10.2% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001) and mortality (1.6% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.001). Leakage (3.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.001) and pancreatic fistula (1% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.036) were significantly more common in the PS group. When compared by resection extent, the PS group had higher severe complication rates than the CG group for DGs (13% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) and a higher mortality rate for TGs (3.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Palliative gastric cancer surgeries are associated with significantly higher rates of severe complications and mortality than are curative surgeries. These findings emphasize the need for careful patient selection and thorough preoperative counseling when considering palliative gastric cancer surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastric Cancer Surgery: Gastrectomy, Risk, and Related Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 992 KB  
Article
Tailored Surgical Treatment and Outcomes in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Case Series of Five Consecutive Paradigmatic Cases
by Arianna Pontrelli, Giovanna Di Meo, Francesco Paolo Prete, Piercarmine Panzera, Giuseppe Massimiliano De Luca, Natale Calomino, Maria Teresa Mita, Belinda De Simone, Michele Bisceglie, Monica Maria Miccoli, Alfio Gianalberto Testini, Michele Covelli, Massimo G. Viola, Luigi Marano and Mario Testini
Diseases 2026, 14(5), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14050180 - 20 May 2026
Viewed by 166
Abstract
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN-P) are rare, low-grade malignancies primarily affecting young women. While surgical resection is definitive, the optimal balance between oncological radicality and functional preservation remains a clinical challenge. This study evaluates tailored surgical strategies utilizing minimally invasive [...] Read more.
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN-P) are rare, low-grade malignancies primarily affecting young women. While surgical resection is definitive, the optimal balance between oncological radicality and functional preservation remains a clinical challenge. This study evaluates tailored surgical strategies utilizing minimally invasive and parenchyma-preserving techniques. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of SPN-P cases treated between March 2020 and May 2023. Out of 167 pancreatic resections, five paradigmatic cases were identified. We analyzed the decision-making process for preoperative staging (CT/MRI/EUS-FNB), surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), and the implementation of parenchyma-preserving versus formal resections. Results: The cohort included four females and one male (mean age 40.6 years; range 13–73). Surgical approaches were tailored to tumor location and patient characteristics: two patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (one laparotomic, one laparoscopic), two underwent distal pancreatectomy (one robotic, one laparoscopic), and one pediatric patient underwent laparoscopic parenchyma-preserving central pancreatectomy. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. No Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) or complications Clavien-Dindo ≥III occurred. At a mean follow-up (FU) of 38.4 months (range 20–58), the disease-free survival rate was 100%. One patient developed new-onset diabetes mellitus following distal pancreatectomy. Conclusions: A tailored surgical approach—integrating robotic, laparoscopic, and parenchyma-preserving techniques—may enable excellent oncological outcomes while minimizing morbidity. For SPN-P, the choice of procedure should prioritize the preservation of pancreatic function, particularly in young patients, without compromising surgical margins. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1269 KB  
Review
Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Surgery: Current Indications, Results, and Future Prospects
by Silvio Caringi, Antonella Delvecchio, Annachiara Casella, Valentina Ferraro, Matteo Stasi, Nunzio Tralli, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Michele Tedeschi and Riccardo Memeo
Cancers 2026, 18(10), 1550; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101550 - 11 May 2026
Viewed by 463
Abstract
Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic surgery (PSPS) is a patient-centered alternative to traditional radical resections for benign and low-grade pancreatic lesions. Unlike pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, which tend to cause long-term exocrine and endocrine deficiency, PSPS aims to preserve functional tissue with a guarantee of oncologic [...] Read more.
Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic surgery (PSPS) is a patient-centered alternative to traditional radical resections for benign and low-grade pancreatic lesions. Unlike pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, which tend to cause long-term exocrine and endocrine deficiency, PSPS aims to preserve functional tissue with a guarantee of oncologic safety. Techniques such as enucleation, central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving head resection, and uncinectomy are illustrative of this equipoise, with less risk of new-onset diabetes and malabsorption but more short-term morbidity in the form of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Advances in imaging technology, minimally invasive procedures, and robotics technology have extended PSPS indications beyond conventional candidates to thoughtfully selected neuroendocrine tumors, cystic neoplasms, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Results are strongly dependent on patient selection, surgeon experience, and institutional volume, highlighting the importance of centralization and subspecialist training. While oncologic proficiency remains essential in aggressive tumors, evidence is in favor of PSPS being a curative and function-preserving option for properly screened patients with low-grade or benign conditions. Priorities for the future include multicenter prospective trials, optimization of perioperative techniques, and inclusion of patient-reported outcomes. PSPS represents a paradigm shift in pancreatic surgery, where technical innovation is balanced with quality of life in the long term and evolving principles of modern, individualized surgical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2616 KB  
Systematic Review
Safety and Efficiency of Various Pancreatic Enucleation Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Deqiang Zhou, Feng Tan, Zihe Wang, Ning Xia, Xing Huang, Li Wang, Shijie Cai, Bole Tian and Junjie Xiong
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3543; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093543 - 6 May 2026
Viewed by 330
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to systematically compare the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MI-pEn), including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches, and open pancreatic enucleation (O-pEn). Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to systematically compare the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation (MI-pEn), including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches, and open pancreatic enucleation (O-pEn). Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 1990 and December 2025 that compared various types of pancreatic enucleation. The literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment followed the PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and R 4.3.0. Results: Fifteen studies were included, with thirteen comparative studies (463 MI-pEn, 547 O-pEn) incorporated into the meta-analysis. Two studies comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted enucleation were also included. No significant difference in clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) was detected between MI-pEn and O-pEn (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.56–1.07; p = 0.12). However, MI-pEn was associated with significantly reduced operation time (MD = −21.24; p = 0.01), blood loss (MD = −75.88; p < 0.00001), hospital stay (MD = −2.07; p = 0.001), and wound infection (OR = 0.3; p = 0.03). Direct comparisons between robotic and laparoscopic enucleation revealed no significant differences in any outcomes. Conclusions: MI-pEn is safe and feasible and offers advantages in terms of operative time, blood loss, and recovery without increasing complications. Robotic and laparoscopic approaches yield comparable short-term outcomes in pancreatic enucleation, although the potential advantage of robotic surgery in reducing pancreatic fistula risk warrants further validation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

56 pages, 761 KB  
Review
Somatostatin and Its Analogues as Second-Line Treatments in Non-Neoplastic Conditions
by Argyrios Periferakis, Lamprini Troumpata, Ioannis Xefteris, Alexandros Kanellos Mavrokefalos, Aristodemos-Theodoros Periferakis, Konstantinos Periferakis, Ana Caruntu, Andreea-Elena Scheau, Christiana Diana Maria Dragosloveanu, Constantin Caruntu and Cristian Scheau
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(9), 3816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27093816 - 25 Apr 2026
Viewed by 418
Abstract
Somatostatin is a potent endocrine regulator and neurotransmitter, exerting predominantly inhibitory effects in different tissues of the body, via G-protein coupled receptors. Five such specific receptors have been identified, with different effects and tissue distribution. The multifaceted actions and effects of somatostatin make [...] Read more.
Somatostatin is a potent endocrine regulator and neurotransmitter, exerting predominantly inhibitory effects in different tissues of the body, via G-protein coupled receptors. Five such specific receptors have been identified, with different effects and tissue distribution. The multifaceted actions and effects of somatostatin make it useful as a potential therapeutical means in various pathologies; however, in clinical practice, somatostatin analogues, namely octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide, are commonly used instead, due to their increased half-life and increased receptor selectivity, with pasireotide showing a more extensive receptor binding profile and high affinity for somatotastin receptor (SSTR) 5, which may prove effective in cases of resistance to first-generation analogues. Apart from their many uses in neoplastic pathologies, somatostatin analogues represent viable treatment choices in some ocular pathologies, congenital hyperinsulinism, gastrointestinal bleedings and portal hypertension, acute pancreatitis, and dumping syndrome. They have also been used in some cases, with varying degrees of success, in patients with post-surgical gastrointestinal and lymphatic fistulas, refractory chronic diarrhoea and polycystic kidney disease; many applications in paediatric patients have also been documented. The aim of this review is to present the applications of somatostatin and its analogues as alternative or second-line therapies, along with insights into their effectiveness and future potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
12 pages, 2285 KB  
Case Report
Fistulating Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs): Case Series and Discussion of a Rare Complication
by Guanqi Hang, Logaswari M, Shuyi Guo, Emma Choon Hwee Lee, Yang Shan Edmond Lim and Zhuyi Rebekah Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(9), 3255; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093255 - 24 Apr 2026
Viewed by 296
Abstract
Background: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a mucin-producing pancreatic tumor with variable malignant potential. While most are asymptomatic and indolent, a subset progress to invasive carcinoma or cause local complications such as pancreatitis. Spontaneous fistulation into adjacent organs is an increasingly [...] Read more.
Background: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a mucin-producing pancreatic tumor with variable malignant potential. While most are asymptomatic and indolent, a subset progress to invasive carcinoma or cause local complications such as pancreatitis. Spontaneous fistulation into adjacent organs is an increasingly recognized phenomenon with impact on prognosis and management. The incidence of fistulation in IPMN in the reported literature is 1.9–6.6%. The most common sites are the stomach, duodenum and bile duct. Reported outcomes are poor, with a median survival of approximately 16 months. Methods: We describe four patients with IPMN complicated by fistula, confirmed by endoscopic or histopathological evaluation with CT and MRI images and discuss the available literature of fistulating IPMN. Results: Fistulation occurred at the common bile duct, stomach, duodenum and duodeno-jejunal junction. Two of four patients passed away at 4.8 and 24.8 months from detection of fistula. Histology revealed high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in most patients, highlighting the aggressive nature of IPMNs complicated by fistulae. Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the importance of recognizing fistula formation as a marker of aggressive disease in IPMN. Although surgical resection remains the treatment of choice in suitable candidates, the rarity of this entity means that standardized management guidelines are lacking. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 879 KB  
Systematic Review
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An Updated Disease-Specific Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Yi Li, Yulin Lei, Wenli Yang, Wen Zhong and Ran Cui
Cancers 2026, 18(9), 1328; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18091328 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 427
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Distal cholangiocarcinoma is a rare biliary tract cancer typically treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Comparative evidence specifically addressing minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for this disease remains scarce. Methods: We conducted an updated systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies limited to distal [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Distal cholangiocarcinoma is a rare biliary tract cancer typically treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Comparative evidence specifically addressing minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for this disease remains scarce. Methods: We conducted an updated systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies limited to distal cholangiocarcinoma. Binary outcomes were summarized as odds ratios, continuous outcomes as mean differences, and overall survival as hazard ratios. The primary survival analysis included only directly reported hazard ratios from prespecified matched or weighted cohorts; hazard ratios reconstructed from Kaplan–Meier curves were examined only in sensitivity analyses. Results: Six retrospective comparative studies involving 1623 patients met the inclusion criteria. Minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower blood loss (mean difference, −104.93 mL; 95% CI, −145.30 to −64.57; I2 = 16.3%). No clear differences were found in clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.25), major morbidity (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.43), or R0 resection (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.56). In the primary overall survival analysis based on directly reported hazard ratios, the pooled hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.52; I2 = 1.3%). In the sensitivity analysis incorporating eligible reconstructed hazard ratios, the pooled hazard ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.05). In an exploratory recurrence-related survival family analysis based on directly reported estimates, the pooled hazard ratio was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.07; I2 = 0.0%). Conclusions: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy may reduce blood loss without clear evidence of worse major postoperative or oncologic outcomes in distal cholangiocarcinoma. However, the available evidence is entirely observational and should be interpreted with caution. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1951 KB  
Article
Hepaticojejunostomy Insufficiency-Associated Arterial Hemorrhage in Patients After Pancreatic Surgery
by Torsten Herzog, Marcus-Thomas Skrobisch, Ahmed Abdelsamad, Waldemar Uhl, Orlin Belyaev, Ilgar Aghalarov and Jennifer Herzog-Niescery
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(8), 2900; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15082900 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 445
Abstract
Background: Postoperative hemorrhage is a severe complication after pancreatic surgery. While bleeding related to pancreatic fistula is well characterized, hemorrhage secondary to biliary leakage remains poorly understood. This study investigates the incidence, associated factors, clinical course, and outcomes of hepaticojejunostomy insufficiency-associated arterial [...] Read more.
Background: Postoperative hemorrhage is a severe complication after pancreatic surgery. While bleeding related to pancreatic fistula is well characterized, hemorrhage secondary to biliary leakage remains poorly understood. This study investigates the incidence, associated factors, clinical course, and outcomes of hepaticojejunostomy insufficiency-associated arterial hemorrhage (HIAA). Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 1413 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery with hepaticojejunostomy between 2004 and 2014. Demographics, underlying disease, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, management strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: HIAA occurred in 13 patients (0.9%), accounting for one third of all erosion-related hemorrhages. The median onset was 16 days postoperatively, and 77% were preceded by sentinel bleeding. Completion pancreatectomy and sepsis were significantly associated with HIAA. The right hepatic artery was the most frequent bleeding source. Primary interventional angiography achieved hemostasis in 62.5% of patients, while 61.5% required surgical revision. Thirty- and ninety-day mortality rates were 15.4% and 30.8%, respectively, compared with 2.1% and 3.7% in the overall cohort. Conclusions: HIAA is a rare but highly lethal complication after pancreatic surgery. It represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by delayed onset, frequent sentinel bleeding, an association with sepsis and completion pancreatectomy, and markedly increased mortality. Early recognition, prompt imaging, and an interventional-first strategy are essential to improve outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 989 KB  
Article
Has the Step-Up Approach Improved Prognosis in Severe Necrotizing Acute Pancreatitis?
by Ricardo Gadea-Mateo, Marina Garcés-Albir, Dimitri Dorcaratto, Georgy Kadzhaya-Khlystov, Vicente Sanchiz, Elena Muñoz-Forner, Rosana Villagrasa, Isabel Mora-Oliver, Elisabetta Casula, Mar Juan-Diaz, Pablo Navarro-Cortés, Jorge Guijarro-Rosaleny, Isabel Pascual-Moreno and Luis Sabater
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(8), 2881; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15082881 - 10 Apr 2026
Viewed by 497
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Acute pancreatitis is a prevalent pathology with increasing incidence. Despite advances in treatment, some patients still present a severe clinical course with high morbidity and mortality rates. We evaluated the association between implementation of a step-up-based management strategy and clinical outcomes [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Acute pancreatitis is a prevalent pathology with increasing incidence. Despite advances in treatment, some patients still present a severe clinical course with high morbidity and mortality rates. We evaluated the association between implementation of a step-up-based management strategy and clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) treated at a tertiary referral center. Method: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients treated for SAP at a tertiary care center. Clinical outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay, were compared between two periods: Period A (1998–2010, classical treatment) and Period B (2011–2021, step-up approach). A subanalysis on minimally invasive techniques was also performed for Period B. Results: In total, 116 patients were included (39 Period A; 77 Period B). Pancreatic fistulas were reduced in Period B (15.38% vs. 5.33%; p = 0.088), as was mortality (30.76% vs. 18.67%; p = 0.15). Open surgeries decreased significantly in Period B (71.9% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.043), as did the mean hospital stay (60.5 ± 28 vs. 33.08 ± 28 days; p < 0.001). When comparing endoscopy management versus Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement (VARD), the rate of pancreatic fistulas was higher in the VARD group (0% vs. 57.1%; p < 0.01). Patients requiring VARD presented with larger collections (710 cc vs. 1737.9 cc; p = 0.03) and fewer procedures (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5; p = 0.002). Conclusions: The step-up management in patients with SAP was associated with a decrease in open surgical approches and length of stay. VARD was performed in patients with higher volume collections and was associated with fewer interventions than patients treated by endoscopic necrosectomy; however, the incidence of pancreatic fistulas was higher. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 2572 KB  
Systematic Review
Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly vs. Younger Patients: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
by Dimosthenis Chrysikos, Nikolaos Taprantzis, Spiros Delis, Amir Shihada, Alexandros Samolis and Theodore Troupis
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2744; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072744 - 5 Apr 2026
Viewed by 376
Abstract
Background: As life expectancy increases, more elderly patients require a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). While minimally invasive approaches are preferred, data indicating the safety of robotic PD in elderly patients remains limited. This study compares operative outcomes of robotic PD in elderly versus younger [...] Read more.
Background: As life expectancy increases, more elderly patients require a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). While minimally invasive approaches are preferred, data indicating the safety of robotic PD in elderly patients remains limited. This study compares operative outcomes of robotic PD in elderly versus younger patients to define its oncological role. Material and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus identified studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly versus younger patients. Robotic-exclusive cohorts were analyzed for perioperative outcomes, complications, and mortality. A meta-analysis was performed using R to calculate pooled prevalences, Odds Ratios (ORs) and Weighted Mean Differences (WMDs). Results: Elderly patients experienced significantly longer operative times (MD = 11.4 min) and hospital stays (MD = 7.76 days). They demonstrated higher odds of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III: OR = 2.20), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR = 2.34), and mortality (OR = 3.42). There were no significant differences in blood loss, transfusions, overall complications, pancreatic fistulae, bile leakage, hemorrhage, infection, readmission, or reoperation. Notably, age-stratified subgroup analyses revealed a distinct risk divergence: studies using an 80-year cutoff reported significantly higher odds of mortality and DGE, whereas 70-year-threshold studies demonstrated more pronounced odds for severe and overall complications. Conclusions: While robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible in elderly patients with comparable intraoperative blood loss and overall complication rates to younger patients, it does not eliminate all age-related risks. Elderly patients remain at significantly higher risk for severe complications and mortality. Therefore, robotic application in this demographic requires rigorous preoperative assessment, utilizing age as an initial risk-stratifier while allowing physiological reserve to determine final surgical candidacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Concepts in Diagnostic and Surgical HPB Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 5643 KB  
Case Report
Bilateral Pancreaticopleural Fistula Masquerading as Thoracic Disease in Chronic Calculous Pancreatitis
by Helen Bolanaki, Francesk Mulita, Ioannis Tzimagiorgis, Ioannis Chrysafis, Hippocrates Moschouris, Nikolaos Courcoutsakis, Savas P. Deftereos and Anastasios J. Karayiannakis
Diagnostics 2026, 16(5), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050720 - 28 Feb 2026
Viewed by 481
Abstract
Background: Pancreaticopleural fistula is a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis resulting from pancreatic duct disruption, typically presenting with pleural effusion and predominant respiratory symptoms. Bilateral pleural involvement is exceptionally uncommon and poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreaticopleural fistula is a rare complication of chronic pancreatitis resulting from pancreatic duct disruption, typically presenting with pleural effusion and predominant respiratory symptoms. Bilateral pleural involvement is exceptionally uncommon and poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Case Presentation: A 56-year-old man with a history of chronic alcohol abuse presented with progressive dyspnea and mild epigastric pain. Imaging revealed bilateral pleural effusions, an atrophic pancreas with a markedly dilated main pancreatic duct containing calculi, and a fistulous tract extending from the pancreatic body through the esophageal hiatus into the mediastinum. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography confirmed the diagnosis of chronic calculous pancreatitis complicated by a pancreaticopleural fistula. After unsuccessful conservative management, the patient underwent distal pancreatectomy, resection of the fistulous tract, and Roux-en-Y pancreatojejunostomy. The postoperative course was uneventful, with complete resolution of pleural effusions and sustained clinical improvement. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of considering pancreaticopleural fistula in patients with unexplained pleural effusions and minimal abdominal symptoms, particularly in the context of chronic pancreatitis. Bilateral involvement, although rare, should not preclude timely diagnosis. Appropriate diagnostic studies by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are crucial for establishing the diagnosis. Surgical management offers definitive treatment in patients with ductal obstruction and calculous disease, resulting in excellent long- term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6637 KB  
Article
The Use of Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy During Endoscopic Drainage of Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis
by Mateusz Jagielski, Agata Chwarścianek, Jacek Piątkowski and Marek Jackowski
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1813; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051813 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 325
Abstract
Introduction: Endotherapy is an established minimally invasive treatment for pancreatic necrosis. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) performed during transmural drainage in patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Materials and Methods [...] Read more.
Introduction: Endotherapy is an established minimally invasive treatment for pancreatic necrosis. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) performed during transmural drainage in patients with symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 512 patients with symptomatic WOPN treated endoscopically between 2018 and 2025 at the Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. In patients qualified for endoscopic necrosectomy, an endoscope was introduced into the necrotic cavity through a previously created transmural (transgastric or transduodenal) fistula, and necrotic tissue was removed using various endoscopic tools. Results: All 512 patients underwent transmural endoscopic drainage. Of these, 226/512 (44.14%) patients (61 women, 165 men; mean age 51.8 [20–78] years) were qualified for endoscopic necrosectomy. The mean size of the necrotic collection was 22.9 (10.6–36.6) cm. A transgastric approach was used in 219/226 (96.9%) patients, and a transduodenal approach in 7/226 (3.1%). Active drainage was maintained for a mean of 16 (7–82) days. The mean number of endoscopic procedures was 4.84 (1–24). Complications occurred in 24/226 (10.61%) patients. Mortality was 5.75% (13/226). Clinical success was achieved in 203/226 (89.82%) patients and long-term success in 197/226 (87.17%). Conclusions: Direct endoscopic necrosectomy performed during transmural drainage achieved high clinical and long-term success with acceptable morbidity in patients with symptomatic WOPN. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreatic Surgery: Clinical Practices and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2824 KB  
Article
Analysis of Different Post-Operative Hyperamylasemia Criteria for Defining Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Distal Pancreatectomy—A Retrospective Single-Center Study
by Lukas Heinrich Poelsler, Ruben Bellotti, Daniel Pably, Dagmar Morell-Hofert, Eva Maier, Benno Cardini, Rupert Oberhuber, Thomas Resch, Florian Ponholzer, Felix J. Krendl, Christian Margreiter, Stefan Schneeberger, Dietmar Öfner and Manuel Maglione
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1803; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051803 - 27 Feb 2026
Viewed by 391
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery has recently defined post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP), stating that sustained postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) for at least 48 h is a pivotal criterion. However, the clinical relevance of POH and PPAP following distal pancreatectomy remains [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery has recently defined post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP), stating that sustained postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) for at least 48 h is a pivotal criterion. However, the clinical relevance of POH and PPAP following distal pancreatectomy remains uncertain. This study compares two PPAP definitions differing in POH criteria. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who consecutively underwent distal pancreatectomy at our institution (2010–2023). PPAP diagnosis required clinical symptoms, characteristic CT findings, and either sustained POH ≥ 48 h (standard group) or transient POH less than 48 h (modified group). Outcomes were compared between definitions. Results: Among 207 patients included, in the standard group, PPAP was diagnosed in 12 (5.8%), and in the modified group in 27 (13.0%) patients. Independent of the applied POH criteria, PPAP was associated with the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (standard: 66.7% vs. 23.7%; p < 0.001; modified: 44.4% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.027). Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III) were also significantly more frequent in patients with PPAP. This was mirrored by a significantly longer length of stay and higher costs. However, in the standard group, PPAP more often resulted in pancreas-specific and major complications compared to the modified group. Of note, in the standard group, only 50% of patients with POH progressed to PPAP, and one-third of patients suffering from PPAP did not develop harmful sequelae. Conclusions: PPAP is an uncommon, however clinically relevant complication following distal pancreatectomy that is better captured using the standard POH definition. Still, further stratification is needed to aid in the prediction of the clinical course. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1272 KB  
Article
Bile Bacterial Colonization Increases Risk of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula and Worsens Overall Survival Following Pancreatoduodenectomy
by Natalia Olszewska, Tomasz Guzel, Kaja Śmigielska, Piotr Paluszkiewicz, Agnieszka Milner, Edyta Podsiadły and Maciej Słodkowski
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(4), 1566; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041566 - 16 Feb 2026
Viewed by 605
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major source of morbidity following a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), often delaying or precluding adjuvant chemotherapy and potentially compromising long-term oncologic outcomes. While established risk models focus on anatomical and biochemical factors, the role of biliary microbiota remains [...] Read more.
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major source of morbidity following a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), often delaying or precluding adjuvant chemotherapy and potentially compromising long-term oncologic outcomes. While established risk models focus on anatomical and biochemical factors, the role of biliary microbiota remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess relationship between bacteriobilia and the incidence of POPF, as well as its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing a PD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: We analyzed the medical histories of 725 patients with a pancreatic tumor who were qualified for surgery between 2017 and 2022. This retrospective cohort study included 138 patients who underwent a PD for histologically confirmed PDAC. Intraoperative bile cultures were obtained and analyzed for microbial presence and resistance patterns. Results: Bacteriobilia was detected in 76.8% of patients, including bacteria with resistance mechanisms (BRM) present in 12.3% of bile samples. Bacterial bile colonization conferred an increased odds of POPF grade B (OR 5.11; p = 0.088), whereas BRM were strongly predisposed to POPF grade C (OR 4.97; p = 0.026). Upon a multivariate analysis, bacteriobilia independently drove clinically relevant POPF and POPF grade B (OR 5.50; p = 0.034 and OR 8.04; p = 0.048, respectively), while BRM remained a key determinant of POPF grade C (OR 6.17; p = 0.047). Beyond morbidity, bile colonization markedly impaired overall survival irrespective of tumor stage (26.7 vs. 54.7 months; log-rank p = 0.009). Conclusions: Bacterial bile colonization may contribute not only to higher rates of POPF but to a significantly reduced OS in patients undergoing a PD for PDAC. Bacteriobilia should be considered as a prognostic factor for worse survival after a PD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 917 KB  
Review
Reducing Complications in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
by Josh B. Karpes, Ken Liu, Michael D. Crawford, Carlo Pulitano, Charbel Sandroussi and Jerome M. Laurence
Cancers 2026, 18(4), 630; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18040630 - 14 Feb 2026
Viewed by 1052
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is a technically demanding field associated with frequent morbidity, with pancreatic fistula representing the dominant driver of major complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Although refinements in operative technique, perioperative management, and institutional systems have contributed to incremental improvements, the overall incidence of [...] Read more.
Pancreatic surgery is a technically demanding field associated with frequent morbidity, with pancreatic fistula representing the dominant driver of major complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Although refinements in operative technique, perioperative management, and institutional systems have contributed to incremental improvements, the overall incidence of clinically relevant complications has remained largely unchanged over recent decades. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy, focusing on modifiable technical, pharmacological, nutritional, and systems-based interventions, whilst acknowledging the underlying biological determinants that remain difficult to alter. This review synthesises contemporary evidence on fistula risk modelling, anastomotic reconstruction, and adjunctive operative techniques. The role of pharmacological interventions is examined alongside an evaluation of perioperative nutritional optimisation and enhanced recovery frameworks. Systems-based strategies such as centralisation, failure-to-rescue performance, protocolised pathways, and algorithm-driven postoperative surveillance are highlighted as emerging areas with substantial potential to impact survival independently of complication rates. Finally, this review explores future directions, including radiomics-based risk stratification, intraoperative imaging, and tailored postoperative care. Together, these domains provide a platform for reducing complication severity, standardising postoperative care, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. By integrating these perspectives, this review aims to present a comprehensive and in-depth narrative of how to reduce complications in pancreas surgery. Overall, this narrative review proposes that meaningful improvements in outcomes after PD likely do not arise from the elimination of complications altogether, but rather from improved prediction, prevention where possible, and critically, more effective systems of care that reduce the severity and consequences of complications when they occur. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop